Best lenses for the Canon M50 and Canon APS-C cameras
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июл 2024
- In this video, it’s going to be all about APS-C cameras and Lenses you should buy for canon mirrorless camera, wether it’s EF-M or EF-S mount. I’ll give you some basic explanation on what an APS-C camera is, what difference it has with a Full Frame Camera, what is crop factor...
I started my journey in filmmaking and video with the #CanonM50 and bought lenses I knew I could also keep if I upgraded my camera body. That’s why I’ve build my kit with lenses that I would really use and give me the best value and quality.
So if you're looking for a wide-angle lens or the best lens for your Canon M50, make sure to watch till the end.
Canon EOS M50 : amzn.to/2K0sUxk
Canon EF-S 10-18mm : amzn.to/2VpwqXx
Canon EF-S 24mm f2.8 : amzn.to/2yTR1eY
Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 : amzn.to/2Rvyn3v
Canon EF 50mm f1.8 : amzn.to/3cauPeP
Viltrox EF/EF-S to EF-M adapter : amzn.to/3ceUumP
(apparently, the Meike adapter I use isn't sold in the US but this one is going to work exactly the same)
▶︎ Instagram : / tvennet
▶︎ My Kit profile : kit.co/Tvennet
**********************************
GEAR:
Canon EOS M50 : amzn.to/2K0sUxk
Canon EF-S 10-18mm : amzn.to/2VpwqXx
Canon EF-S 24mm f2.8 : amzn.to/2yTR1eY
Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 : amzn.to/2Rvyn3v
Canon EF 50mm f1.8 : amzn.to/3cauPeP
Sony A7iii : amzn.to/3beHtt2
Tamron 17-28 f2.8 : amzn.to/2RxLv8b
Tamron 28-75 f2.8 : amzn.to/2Rs7q0w
Zhiyun Weebill LAB : amzn.to/34uKD9z
InCase Pro DSLR Backpack : amzn.to/3c9EiDe
***********************************
▶︎ Instagram : / tvennet
▶︎ My Kit profile : kit.co/Tvennet
***********************************
#nosmallcreators #m50stories
MUSIC:
Epidemic sound : bit.ly/34uJjDB
Little correction: you don’t have cropped 4K and keep dual pixel AF on the M6 Mkii.
They updated the nifty fifty to use STM and it is as silent as the 24mm now! I love it again!
I know but man...I don’t know if it’s worth upgrading...and I already have like 5 vintage 50mm that...I don’t know...rahhhhh the struggle!!!!
such a good, clear informative video. I was confused with all the others i watched. I'm learning about cameras and lenses now, want to buy an m50 soon
Really want to try out that Sigma 18-35 on my M50 one day, looks sooo niceeeeee
Thanks for the info! I just bought a m50 for my vlogs. I was using my phone. Haha I'm really excited for buying some lenses. I have a 24mm already. I can't wait to try it. Thanks again!
Hope you’ll enjoy it as much as I do!!!
Thomas, you have the best logical advice for your audience. Thanks for sharing your expertise! I know it's a lot of work, but it would've been awesome to see samples of the photos/videos with the recommended lens too. Keep up the great videos!
Yep, I agree. I only thought about it after hitting the publish button 🤦🏻♂️ next time. Promise.
You have taught me more in 2 minutes of this video than 3 years of watching camera videos. 💯
Thanks bro
Thank you sooo much !! Amazing advices!! Keep up Dude
Amazing video mate. Keep it up!
M6 mk ii gets full sensor readout and dpaf in 4k. Great vid
Aye, you're back. Man, I really hope you're safe and healthy.
-
I too was thinking the same, buying EF-M lenses makes no sense to me. Someday, if I want to upgrade my system I'd have to buy most lenses again, whereas in the case of EF lenses they can easily be used in more advanced Canon or any other systems.
-
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, maybe try uploading more often. I really appreciate your content.
Thanks a lot Gaurav. I know I’ve been inconsistent with uploads...is there anything you’d like to see on my channel? Thanks a lot for watching anyway ;)
@@Tvennet just getting camera doesn't makes the user a filmmaker, so is the case with me... Maybe some tips related to scripting and editing videos would make sense. I know it sounds like the one of the older video but, more advanced video would help. Thank you.
Hi! If you had the chance one day, I would love to see a review of the canon m50, Tamron 15-30 f2.8 with speedbooster. I can't find this combination on youtube, no one has done that yet...✌
I really appreciate your honesty in your videos! Now I know that I'm gonna buy the adaptor with ef-s lense but do you recommend Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 for an all-in-one lens?
I never used it, but I took a bit of time to research about the lens. It looks like a good all around lens, to replace your kit lens, and it’s a bit sharper. The corners are a bit soft. But for the rest, it looks good for the price. The focal range is really versatile so... it might be a good choice.
@@Tvennet thanks a lot!
Very good advice. Makes sense to get lenses you can use later. I have the m50 and when I upgrade I’m sure it would be to the EOS R.
That was exactly my plan! When lenses are you using on the M50?
Tvennet Thanks for the response! I use the kit lens and the nifty fifty. Been looking at the Sigma 16mm and efm 22mm. Now I’m rethinking it.
Really want to get a little test of those sigma lenses. But again, it’s still EFM only...if the m50 Mkii ever comes out with everything people are asking, or at least fix a couple issues, then why not...
Anyway, thanks a lot for watching and dropping a comment 🙌🏻
Hi, thanks for this video, I'm planning to buy a wide lens to replace the m50 kit lens. Mostly I'm shooting 4k (fix camera), what do you recommend between the ef-m 11-22, and the ef-s 10-18 (sharpness is the most important).
Thanks
Instead of telling « you should buy this lens », I’m just going to point out a couple things and then give me reco. So you shoot in 4K...that means your crop is x2.56. That’s going to be difficult to be wide because at the widest focal lenght, 10mm is already 25.6mm which is wide but not super wide. Then there’s this question: are you going to upgrade your camera some day? If the answer is yes: then grab the 10-18mm. If the answer is no: 11-22mm. They’re practically the same lenses. I personally would go with the 10-18 because you can get one for really cheap and it isn’t a bad lens...but...if you’re really looking at getting a wide angle, drop the 4K and shoot 1080p. You’ll keep the dual pixel autofocus and with the je right export settings, you’ll get amazing results.
Love your videos! Keep going!
I would love to see some video footage of the lenses you recommended in this video using the m50! Follow up video idea?
Well both cinematic videos I have on the channel we’re made with these lenses...but yeah why not make some new short videos just focusing on the lenses...
okay
the whole purpose of buying M series Cameras is to go compact and if you use the adapter + sigma lens, it defeats the purpose of it. So 22 MM F2 is a sensible choice in my opinion and it doesn't cost much (F1.8 V F2, is not such a big difference anyway)
Différent point of view. I bought the m50 not because it was compact but because I was on a budget and that it was one of the only cameras to offer everything I wanted. I consider being someone that « buys for the upgrade ». I knew I would at some point upgrade to something else than the M serie. A camera body can be changed, but lenses can be kept. And to be honest, canon doesn’t care about the M serie. The last rumors are from months ago without any roadmap, and besides Sigma that is doing an effort, third parties have a bit abandoned the M mount.
And the EOS-M lenses cream the old EF lenses for sharpness. I was getting ready to buy an adapter and some good EF lenses until I started watching back to back comparisons. The Nifty-50 has focus problems at wide aperture (it's OK at f 2.2), the Yongneo clone is even worse. If you put it behind the Viltrox speedbooster to get it back to 32mm and make it faster then it's almost unusable. A Viltrox Speebooster an the Canon 50mm costs about the same as the EF-M 32mm but the latter is much much nicer - cleaner, better bokeh. Even if you don't speedboost and add up your Canon 50mm STM with an adapter you're only $175 off of getting a good lens.
The Sigma stuff is really nice but they make the same size lenses for every camera and just modify the mount so they're larger around then the EF-M lenses and the focus motors are a bit noisier.
Great video keep it up
Hey Thomas, I'm using the canon m50 with a kit lens. I'm looking to step up my production quality. I'm looking to record talking head videos, just like this one. Would you recommend getting the speed booster + nifty fifty or going VILTROX 56mm F1.4 f/1.4 AF Autofocus Lens? What do you think? Thnkas!
I’ve got a specific opinion (and video) about the speedbooster…so I’ll never recommend it.
And for lens choice, I don’t know how far your camera is from you for talking heads, but lately I’ve been enjoying using more à 35mm equivalent (so a 24-28 focal lenght on the m50) for interviews…
Hello Thomas, thanks for the video! I just bought a brand new Canon M50, and it came with the 15-45mm Kit Lens. What other lenses would you suggest I get? Or do I need any other lenses while I learn? As I’m still quite new to photography.
Hey Blake, if you’re just a beginner and don’t really know a lot about cameras, I would recommend using the kit lens for a while. Learn the in’s and out’s, practice by shooting a lot of different things. There will be a moment where you’ll feel that you are limited, that’s the moment you’ll start looking into what will improve or help you progress. The kit lens can already do good things, and if you do it right, you’ll progress fast. Meanwhile, save every single penny or $ for the day you’ll want to buy something better.
Thomas Vennet Thanks for your reply. And what lenses would you suggest, when it comes time for upgrading later on down the track?
It really depends on the kind of photography you want to make. For architecture and landscapes it’s going to be wide angle lenses, for portrait it’s going to be prime lenses or some telephoto lenses...and still you can do everything with any lens in fact.. there are 2 kind of ways to do it : 1) buy specifically for the kind of look you want or 2) buy a setup for versatility and covering a wider range of focal length. With option 2) I would try to still keep it minimal. Commonly there is what people call the « trinity » composed with a 16-35, 24-70, 70-200 and that covers almost any kind of thing you want. But that’s possible in full-frame and unfortunately the M50 is an aps-c camera. You can get a 10-18 or 11-22 for your wide angle shots, then the 18-35 or 17-55, and a 50-150 (but that’s a lens I don’t know about so I can’t talk about it). If you really want something that gives you quality, sharpness and despite the 600$ price is still the best value for your money: sigma 18-35 f1.8. I could make an entire video about it just because it’s a beautiful lens, the build quality et the picture quality are insane, the sharpness is extremely good...and a lens that regroups 5 prime lenses for that price is just the Best Buy you could do.
Thomas Vennet Excellent. That’s great to know! Thanks again for taking the time to reply, really appreciate it 😊
I also recomended to first buy a nd variable nd filter for kit Lens, for better video outdoor when is sunny
great video bro, I am in a situation here, I bought the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Zoom Lens for my M50, just got it today and no fit, I know 0 about lenses, I bought it on a recommendation, what would be the best adapter so I can use this lens? Thanks
You can buy any regular adapter to mount the lens, but not the speedbooster. Meike, Commlite, vello...they’re all the same and work just the same as the official canon one for a third of the price.
I got this lens in stead of a kit lens when I bought the 800D. It is a great all purpose lens. However, they have stopped making it.
Just found your content. Great video. I'm on the market for an m50. Would you have ant advice for best lense or filter for product shots? I'm new in this area.
A lot of my product shots are actually shot with a Canon FD 50mm 1.4. It’s a vintage lens and fully manual, so I wouldn’t recommend it if you’re just starting.. even if I don’t really like it, the 50mm 1.8 is a good option for product shots. Maybe if you want something a bit sharper the Sigma 30 and Sigma 56 1.4 will be a better pick.
@@Tvennet Thank you for your insight, Mr. Vennet!
If you have more questions, head Over to Instagram ;)
I really enjoyed your cinematic videos with the M50. What you can produce with “inexpensive” equipment is really impressive. I have been using my iPhone with a gimbal but am ready to get more of a proper camera. The price of the M50 is attractive but I am also looking at the M6 Mark ii. I have also been thinking about a Sony a6600. It’s a tough decision because I feel like I’m committing to a system for a long time. Tough decision
Well...
The M6ii does fix a couple of flaws from the M50, that’s a fact but it has no viewfinder which can be a problem for photography... The M50 is still a good choice, especially with the slight price drop. But if I didn’t have a camera today...I think I would pick the Sony. The menus are maybe a bit more complicated, but the technology, the HLG picture profile, the video quality and the low light performances still give it a little advantage. Not to mention the AF in video is also better in 4K and there’s no extra crop... I know it’s a tough choice, I was also in the same situation when I bought the M50...
@@Tvennet I appreciate the input. I have heard Sony’s menu system will have a learning curve. I will be using it for mostly video and would also get a gimbal with it (I really like my Movi iPhone gimbal), so good autofocus will be important. I don’t render in 4K but it’s nice to have in FCPX for flexibility. I am hoping Sony drops a new aps-c soon. If there is an a6700/7000 in a few months that might be the one I go with. But I really like your style. I felt like I was watching Gotham. Dark Knight-esque. Well done!
I have the canon m50 with the ronin sc.. and my favorite lens is the sigma 16mm 1.4 😊 it’s one of my most used lens! I was going to buy the sigma 18-35 before but considering i won’t be able to use it with my ronin sc, i went with the 16mm instead. 😊🎥 i make videos primarily.. i really love this setup! 😁
Yeah I definetly need to get my hands on that 16 and 35 mm just to give it a go and maybe jump to native EFM mounts
Tvennet yup! I’m also thinking on the native lenses. Especially the 11-22 ef-m, it will be great and compact versus the 10-18. 😁 and i just wanna say that it’s great to see you uploading again! 😊👍🎥
Hey my friend i just saw your documentaries about the tatoos and the interview in Dubai, congrats nice job! one question how is working the ronin sc whit canon m50 and sigma 16mm 1.4? thank you!
Hi Thomas! Here's a couple questions (out of many): Is the Speed Booster also an Adapter? If so, since the Speed Booster can give you an extra f-stop for better light, wouldn't it be a good choice? Second, in terms of weight and bulk for traveling and hiking, does the adapter add significantly? What do you think of the EF-M 55-200mm. I love nature/wildlife shots, what would you suggest?
Hi Dan & Annie! So...the speedbooster is also an adapter BUT it only works with Canon EF lenses. To be totally honest, the extra stop of light isn’t really a big deal, it helps sometimes but there’s also something that isn’t told a lot: the speedbooster slightly soften the images...you’ll lose a tiny bit of sharpness, and some people report that it also drains the battery faster... in terms of weight, a regular adapter doesn’t weight a lot. Like 20g more which isn’t really a big difference in the bag. The speedbooster weights a bit more...around 100g if I remember. I don’t have the 55-200, but if you want to shoot wildlife/animals from a distance, it might be a good choice. For real nature/landscape I personally use something wide like the 10-18...hope it helps ;) and if you have more questions, I’m always here to help.
@@Tvennet Good to know! Thanks Thomas.
I just binge watch your content. You're so cool dude 👌 Great video!
I think you got a couple points wrong on this, as some of the native lenses are better (size and quality):
11-22mm > 10-18mm
22mm f2.0 > 24mm f2.8
Unless you already own the EF lenses the EF-m options are both better.
I disagree.
But each his opinion 🤷🏻♂️
Really good info and loved your channel, glad i found it. and joined 🔔 😀 .. this is Rivu, fellow filmmaker frm india
Great video, thanks
Can I attach sigma 18-35mm f1.8 on canon original adapter instead viltrox speed booster.
The answer is in the video…
The answer is yes.
That lens is actually meant to be used with a normal adapter.
Thanks for lens review. What lens you can recommend for m50 4k mode (1.6x crop), if mount camera on gimbal? I expecting 24mm ef-s become something around 61mm in 4k(M50), and can be useful with gimbal for portrait videos. I'm also looking for 30mm Sigma ef-m for 4k usage.
The first question is: why would you shoot in 4K?
In addition to the extra crop, you lose the dual pixel autofocus. On top of that, you get horrible rolling shutter.
Gimbals are great with wide angle lenses ( unless you’re looking for the Michael bay effect with a very compressed background).
Then, the question is: what gimbal?
The 2 lenses I can think of are the 10-18 or the sigma 16mm.
I like the 24mm in 1080p for the 30-35mm look. I think it’s a very cinematic kind of image you get from it that makes great portraits plus give a bit of the background for context.
That said, I still wouldn’t recommend shooting in 4K.
@@Tvennet I have zhiyun crane m2 and m50 with 50mm 1.8 stm II lens. I managed to get 360 Michael bay effect with this lens in Full-HD mode.When i switched to 4k i got a picture equivalent to 128mm and a terrible rolling shutter...So I want to try a wider lens for a 360 portrait b-roll in 4k and see if a rolling shutter can suit me with a wider lens.Do you have any experience with 24mm lenses in 4k? how visible is the rolling shutter?
Why 4k? Perhaps because the picture is more detailed.
About poor autofocus in 4k - this is not a big problem for me, because I plan to focus in manual mode under the control of focus picking feature.
Sigma 18-35 is game changer, but for me, for hiking is to heavy. I using efm 22mm f2.0, is ultra light. I buy on ebuy used part for 150$
Got my Canon 80D with the 18mm-135mm (29mm-216mm full frame) f/3.5-5.6 IS USM which I think makes a good 'jack of all trades' lens. I don't have a 28mm-70mm equivalent lens as this fits that slot. I did some research and bought the Canon 10mm-18mm and the Sigma 1.8 Art lens and agree both good to have in your kit. The Sigma lens is my 'go to' lens for a lot of my landscape photos - not really into video shooting. the f1.8 gives you about a f2.8 full frame equivalent so it's great for low light situations. Just saving up to move to a mirrorless full frame. Hoping one of the new Canon R series over the next 2 years will fit that slot (please don't get greedy with prices Canon) but if not may switch so don't want to invest in more glass at the moment.
I really want to try someday a lens like the 18-135. Don’t know how I would feel having so much zoom range... the only thing that kept me from upgrading to the R was all video specs when using APS-C lenses...but I think for photography you would be ok. There might be a low priced R, even if the RP is already quite « cheap ». Thanks a lot for taking time to comment and watch anyway, means a lot!
@@Tvennet Thanks, I want IBIS and not that touchpad so as I need to save more and be patient! Good luck with the Channel and stay safe.
That is a great lens , next on my wish list
Hey! Just got my M50 are ef-s lenses compatible with the M50 or do you need a speed booster/adapter?
Like I mentioned in the video, EF-S lenses don’t work with the speedbooster. They only work with a regular adapter. You can buy any brand, they’re all the same.
Hi Thomas, thanks for the video. I am also considering buying m50 for photography and the main reason is that you can find a lot of used Canon lenses at good prices. I know the Sony is better but Sony lenses cost a fortune. What do you think?
It’s a good question...
The M50 is a very capable camera for photography, and it’s true that you have a big selection of canon lenses.
Sony isn’t that much expensive if you stay away from their top lenses (GM) and if you look at Tamron or even viltrox lenses, they’re quite affordable. The benefit is that even if you buy an Apsc Sony (the a6xxx serie), the mount is the same as the full frame cameras (a7xx) so you can keep the lenses if you upgrade.
Reason why again I bought the adapter on the m50 because I wanted to upgrade in the future.
The 22mm M f2 would of been a better choice than the 24mm f2.8.
The STM version of the nifty fifty is a quieter and faster option over the Mk1 version.
Why would it have been a better choice when I knew for a fact that I would upgrade my camera sooner or later and wanted to keep my lenses? I don’t say it’s a bad lens, just that it’s not my way to buy gear.
@@Tvennet because the video is titled "Best Lenses for M50"! 😜
Because this channel is mine and it’s my opinion. It’s MY lens choice. MY recommendation. I accept yours, but then you should also accept mine.
@@Tvennet 💯 just joking brother
Your recommendation isn't wrong, it's just a personal recommendation. There are better recommendations such as the STM version of the 50mm f1.8 EF, the 40mm f2.8 EF STM, and lastly there's the 35mm f1.4 M If if you want to shoot on canon. Your view is based mainly on shooting video, so you're basing the recommendation on that, whereas I'm shooting stills only.
If you don't want anyone to comment, just turn off comments and have no interaction with your viewers.
Great video ! Just bought M50 ! Trying to find which lenses would be best for food or product photography?? Thanks 🙏
For food or product photography, it’s very popular to shoot with a 50mm or a 90mm Macro (talking full frame focal lenghts). So for the m50, a 35mm and maybe a 50 or 85mm with a regular adapter would be good. If you don’t have an adapter, I would also recommend looking at the Sigma 30mm and 56mm 1.4 they’re really good and sharp. I was planning on actually make a video on product photography at home, don’t know if that would be something that helps...
Thomas Vennet sure !! I would be soooo interested in it !!! Waiting ☺️🙌
Product photography at home is 100 % what I'm interested in 👍
Great video man!! I too have an M50 for which I bought a Sigma 18-35 and a 50mm f1.8. But I notice you didn't mention the canon lens ( which I got as a package deal along with the standard kit 15-45mm lens ) and that is the 22mm f2 lens which I absolutely love!! I would like to hear your comments on this lens! Thank you Thomas
I don’t talk about EFM lenses because simply I don’t put money in that system. And I would even push people to do the same right now, because the latest rumors are not very bright for the EFM system..
@@Tvennet I hear you, but I had a deal for the M50 with 2 lenses. The 22mm is a 'prime' lens and quite fast at f2, it is known as the 'pancake' lens, it's really very good!! All my other lenses are EF or EF-S and I use them with the Canon adapter, cheers
@@Tvennet the EF-M system will live on as long as ppl own EF-M bodies. I wouldn't steer folks away from it if it can fulfill their needs. It's an affordable alternative entry point into the Canon EF system.
@@brucemarshall1439 the 22mil pancake is prob the best pancake lens ever made. "Hidden" macro capabilities, tack sharpness, awesome color rendering and a great focal length make it a real marvel in a tiny package. Paired with an M10/100/200 it is such a light and powerful kit. This lens will be a hot item in the used market in a few years time.
Sorry but…with canon releasing the R50 recently, which is basically the M50 with an RF mount…it’s clearly the sign that the M mount is going to be discontinued in the next year or two.
I have a m50 and bought the 50 mm Ef and for some reason the sigma 30 mm 1.4 but now im looking for a all in one lenses at least with 200 mm in the end
Im sorry is that sigma 18-35 full frame? if it is so i suposed im gonna need adapter right? im new in this cameras stuff, is just i have M50 and i want a good aperture lens..
Thé sigma 18-35 is an APS-C lens with an EF mount. You’ll need a regular adapter for it, like those linked in the description. The sigma 18-35 is probably the best lens in terms of quality and price...it’s a really really good investment. You can’t go wrong.
Hey. How are you?
tell me, is it true that ef-s lenses with canon m50 give a little better picture quality?
Mhhhh that’s new...I never heard anything about that. It’s worth investigating a bit. EF and EFS lenses might have a slightly better glass quality...Also, each lens has it’s own quality.
@@Tvennet why did not choose canon 80d like casey neustat? the matrix is about the same, but the canon 80d has an all-i 90 mb mode, helps with color correction
I wanted something more compact, smaller. I had experience with my 20D in the past. It was too big for me too carry around, it’s directly getting attention. I wanted something I could just throw in the bag, pick up when needed and giving me good quality.
I have a question. I’ve been having a my M50 for about a year now and am looking to get some better glass on my camera that isn’t too expensive. Im looking for either an M mount or EF mount lens for canon that’s somewhere in the focal range of 24-70mm or 18-55mm and an aperture of F 2.8 or higher. My price range is anything under like $600 or $700. What do you think a good lens for me is?
I think the 17-55mm 2.8 EF-S lens might be your only options for those specs. Granted it is widely considered Canon's best EF-S lens, so you can't go wrong there. The original EF-M kit lens is nice and sharp, better than the 15-45, but it's a variable aperture so it won't stay at 3.5 for long. Def look into the 17-55mm. It is also stabilized!
@@Linteria Yeah I ended up going with the 24-105 F4
@@YTBrickBuilds great choice!
This is so helpful, I really want the Sigma 18-35mm now. Also your videos are so great... more more more! 🤗❤️
Go get it💪🏻 you will never regret it! What kind of videos would you like to see more on the channel?
Tvennet I’ll be sure to use your affiliate link when I do. It may not be for a couple months tho. I really enjoy videos about the Canon M50 because that’s what I own and I always wanna see videos from people who are exceptionally knowledgeable so you’re the best I have ever seen with it. I like that you show what kind of video is possible with a more budget friendly camera if you put in the work and time (and a different lens). It’s absolutely inspiring and motivating! I’m interested in Canon M6 Mark II but also the Fuji XT4 and also Sony cameras. I’m interested in everything, really! I can already tell that you will be just as popular as people like Matti Haapoja, Peter McKinnon, and Daniel Schiffer to name a few. This is YOUR year! 🤗
P.S. when you said “15 years ago,” that was pretty funny. 😆
Awwww thank you that’s really supportive and kind. I still have a long road ahead, but I won’t let it stop me!
I am Canon EOS M50 mirrorless camera user and my lens is use before is 50mm 1.8, now i switch to Canon EF-M 32mm F/1.4. Is this good to use for video beauty content inside the studio?
I like my 32mm efm lens I just find it to-restrictive on the focal lengh . Trying to find some solution in the 85mm range
I also use the Sigma 30mm,f/1.4 ART lens on my 80D & M50
I have just bought the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 Art. Great lens but not cheap.
I would recomended rather 22mm f2.0 efm, than canon EFS 24mm f2.8.
Canon 22mm efm ( better light) and used one cost only about 150$ and is only about 100gram heavy, best choice for trips, shooting landspace, and vlogs like talking head.
But like I said, you can’t evolve or upgrade with EFM lenses. I don’t say they’re bad, just that it’s not my kind of mindset.
Thomas you should have even more subs man you are truly a gem out here! Excellent reasoning straight shooter - haha pun intended. LOL kudos!
Have you considered the Sigma 30mm f1.4 for ef-m? Roughly 50mm equivelent. Tac shar focus and wide aperature for around £220
I did at one point. But not anymore, since I already have the sigma 18-35 1.8 that is as sharp than the 30mm 1.4 and the difference between 1.8 and 1.4 is barely noticeable.
And...I honestly won’t put a penny into EF-M lenses. With what is going on at canon, the recent statements and patent released, I think we’re very close to an end for the EFM system. But again, I don’t say that the sigma trio is bad, they’re fantastic from what I’ve seen and tested but it’s not my cup of tea.
Hi Thomas, I was curious if You ever tried out the Sigma art 24-70 mm and F/2.8 as well as the Tamron 24-70 MM F/2.8 . What are You thoughts about those?
Nope haven’t tried these lenses unfortunately. But if you had the two lenses in front of me right now, I’ll go Sigma. They always have something special in quality of image. Something you can’t explain.
@@Tvennet Thanks men! Great too know.
Good video! How aboutthe the lenses sigma 24-105…?
Never used it..but I’ve always been intrigued by this kind of zoom lens. Might try to get my hands on one and try it out...
can you tell me the correct viltrox speed booster for the sigma 18-35 lens to the m50
You don’t use the sigma 18-35 with a speedbooster. You use it with a regular adapter.
I got a m50 with the kit lense but what would you suggest for low light video shooting. . Early morning just before the sun comes up.. Tks
You'll need something fast, so at least an f2.8 aperture. Not going to talk about the Sigma 18-35 again, because I think I'm going to be annoying (but hey, it's the best lens for video/photo on app-c cameras). But you can take a look at the:
Sigma 16 f1.4 efm
Sigma 30 f1.4 efm
Canon 32 f1.4 efm
Canon 22 f2 efm
Canon 24 f2.8 efs
Depending what you'll actually are going to shoot. Is it landscape? is it portrait?
Thomas Vennet is going to be video of fishing early in the morning. Real early. On a fixed mount in the background and I’ll use the camera for b roll. I was thinking about the speed booster with the nifty fifty but I’m new to all the camera and video stuff so I figured I better ask ppl with exp
Hold on a minute. Before buying the speedbooster, you need to think about something: are you going to invest money in EF glass or upgrade your camera to full frame? Because if you’re not planning on one of these, then don’t buy the speedbooster just for the 50mm you have plenty of alternatives that are even better like the sigma 30mm 1.4
Man i looked for this video for 2weeks now since i buy my m50 and didint know what lens to buy, i purchased my viltrox m2 0.71 with the nifty fifty and the next will be the 18-135
Hi there i just got Canon EoS M50 Mirroless camera and i want to upgrade the lens with low light benefits with stabilisation. And also one lens for zooming distance objects with stabilisation. Please help me with finding a agood lens for that.
You’ll need to make compromises. A good zoom, with IS and low light capabilities? That’s going to cost you a kidney. Like the 70-200 2.8 which cost 2000$. And when you say “from distance” how much distance we talk?
I have the m50 with a Sigma 17-50 f2.8 ... it’s an amazing lens. Sharp. But it does suffer from the same noise when auto-focusing
Interesting! Never considered this lens in fact but it might be one I’d like to try! How’s the AF?
@@Tvennet Lens is amazing and is my go-to workhorse 🤩 Autofocus is pretty good but does have some focus breathing challenges to manage.
Here's my latest video shot with this lens and the M50: m.ruclips.net/video/fLjFw62y-Fw/видео.html&t
Would love your thoughts 🙌
Looks pretty solid and professional.👌🏻got just one or two moments where you can see either the digital ibis or warp stabilizer wobbling around, but for the rest, it’s super clean. Well done!
@@Tvennet Thank you so much 🙏 Yes! Definitely noticed that too and I agree! All shot hand held so I got to improve my camera movements 😅
David Rodriguez wow first pass you’d never tell that it was hand held, well done! Yeah i love this lens and for the price it’s pretty incredible
what your must bring lens if you go holiday with m50?
That’s a tough one...but I would still take the Sigma 18-35. Even if there’s a bit of weight, it gives me wide shots and portraits in one lens...
I have 50mm with the adapter, 16mm sigma and the kit lens for the m50. I want something to shoot street photography with at a distance so I'm still social distancing. Any recommendations?
I’d say 85mm (with the apsc crop you should be around 135mm) or go wild and go for a 70-200. That’s what I’m leaning to as soon as I can for the same reasons. I know a lot of Street photographers use it and the result is amazing especially for candid photos without no one knowing you took a picture.
Thomas Vennet thank you! I really appreciate the fast response
I have the Canon M50 with the 10-18mm lens. BEST COMBO for an everyday vlogger! haha.
Yep! That’s a pretty solid combo for vlogging, even if the lens isn’t that sharp and isn’t the best in low light, it’s still super wide and not heavy at all to hold it on the gorilla pod! Super setup!
@@Tvennet What would you suggest that would be a better lens with the same purpose? I'm looking for a vlogging/landscape lens but with better image, faster speed, better in low-light--but not a fixed lens.
Fast low light lenses aren’t really common especially if they’re zoom lenses. The one I can think of is a 16-35 but it’s pricey. Tokina & sigma have faster zoom lenses but they come with a cost. The only affordable option would be the 16mm 1.4 from sigma.
Hi!
I am looking for a lens especially for sport events (indoor and outdoor). Because I want made photos just for my pleasure, I don’t want pay much for lens. So I can’t decide between Canon EF 70-300 IS USM II and Tamron 70-300 Di VC USD. What did you recommend?
After read that Canon EF 70-300 IS USM is not recommended on APS-C sensor I am looking at Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, too.
So, what did you recommend for sport between these 3 lens?
I have a Canon m50 + viltrox speedbooster adaptor for low light and canon adoptor for good light - so, I can use the both adaptor. Also, the Canon 70-300 IS USM IIlens is around 480 euro, Tamron around 330 euro and Canon EF-S 55-250mm is around 230-250 euso.
But...
Since you have the speedbooster, why not go for your first idea, canon 70-300 w/ speedbooster? You’ll get that extra stop of light on a long range lens for indoor shoots...
I don’t really have much experience with those lenses. The only 70-300 I have is an old sigma one which is horrible, and all the other times I’ve used telephoto lenses, it was a 70-200L (which, btw, would be what I personally would invest in, but it’s expensive unless you buy second hand)
@@Tvennet Thank you!
💯💯💯
I mean the EF-M 22mm is pretty good for low light. Probably the best M series lens though am I right?
Never used the 22mm but heard good things. But the 3 sigma lenses are better. Just to clarify things, I never said ef-m lenses are bad, but investing money in it is a bad decision if you plan to upgrade to a camera using EF or EFS or even RF lenses.
@@Tvennet Yeah, I definitely don't plan on buying the M lenses new since you can get them in great condition used for a much better price. I am considering the sigma EF-M 16mm f/1.4 though for low light shots and video and for astrophotography.
for a suggestion: I need a cheap lens for a good picture for Instagram, eBay posting, etc(selling small items or wallets). Also need for a youtube video for making something and recording on a table. I have the kit lens. Thanks
The kit lens. What you actually need is not a lens, but light. If you absolutely want a cheap lens, buy a vintage lens. You can get a Canon FD 50mm 1.4 for around 50-90$ and the adapter is 10$.it’s fully manual, but I do almost 99% of my product photography with it.
But honestly: buy a light. Godox SL60 and a soft box.
@@Tvennet Thanks for advice
Thomas can i use EF lens on APSC Cameras ?
Depends what kind of Apsc camera.
If you use an EOS-M camera, you need an adapter.
If you have like a Rebel or [xxx]D, the yes without adapter.
Have all 3 the 16 f1.4 and the 30 f1.4 such Sharp lenes
Between the EF-M 22mm and EF 50mm, which one is better for thr Canon M50?
Which on is better...that depends actually on the look you want. They’re different focal lenghts and aperture. The 22mm is closer to a 35mm look and the 50mm is more like a 85mm. Total different look. I personally don’t like the autofocus noise on the 50mm...so...I would pick the 22 but only based on my personal preference.
Thomas Vennet Thank you sharing
22 mm is a good general purpose lens. Note this does not mean it can do everything. It is nice and compact. 50 mm is more a portrait lens, much more limited. However it brings more extra when compared to the lens.
What is the best lens adapter for canon m50?
Adapters are all acting the same... the Meike or the Viltrox adapters are cheap and work great... don’t need to buy the expensive Canon adapter, just make sure they keep autofocus enabled...
I got a Commlite adapter on Amazon that works great.
ISAAC FEINBERG does it not affect the autofocus
Nope. Never had any issue with autofocus with any adapter
Would a sigma 30mm ART lens also work with the adaptor?
Thé sigma 30mm f1.4 Art comes in 2 mounts for canon: the EF-S version which needs an adapter, and they released an EFM version that doesn’t. The EFS version is an ART DC, the EFM is an ART DN. Check the side of the lens ton see which one you have or consider buying (there’s also like a 100$ difference between both lenses)
Thomas Vennet thanks for the response! I’m wondering if there is a difference between the two lenses, and if the dn one for the m50 is also an “art” lens?
For some reason I couldn’t find the 30mm art version for the Ef-m mount anywhere online
My bad, the EFM version is a Contemporary Lens, not an Art Lens. There's not much a big difference in terms of image quality, it's mostly in build and type of lenses you get.
www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1510007-REG/sigma_302971_30mm_f_1_4_dc_dn.html
Sir... I teach by writing on the White board with enough lighting but words are not sharp, crispy & visible enough. I want to make my words look sharp & crispy, I have to decrese ISO to 100 but When I do it I myself don't look good even after having sufficient lighting.
If I want me & my words look clear & crispy with good light, then which lens should I purchase for white board teaching for best quality ? Sir plz help me....
You don’t need a specific lens. You need to push you aperture to at least f8 and above. The lower your aperture, the more depth of field it will make. You’ll need more light because it’s going to be darker, or push your iso to 800 (not above)...
@@Tvennet
Thank you so much Sir for giving me a such a nice advice.!
But Sir If I increase ISO, I look good but words written on the whiteboard begins to lose sharpness & visiblity.
Like I said... push your aperture to f8 and above, and both will be sharp.
What’s the main lens you use
I don’t have one main lens. I switch lenses depending on what I want to shoot and the image I want.
But if you tell me that I can go to the moon with one lens only: sigma 18-35.
Great video Thomas, through speaking to one of the Canon reps on their Live Chat service - bit.ly/2Y6IbTY I was please to find that I could actually use a 2x Extender III and the EF-100-400mm - still focuses very well, seems the Dual Pixel AF seems to work down to f/11!
How about sigma 17-50mm f2.8?
Don’t have it, can’t say but seems pretty solid.
Efm mounts or anyother mounts get damage easily after someday rough uses or regular uses. So please try to use orginal mount lenses. Thats my suggestions.. cheap comes with cheap quality.. if you need good quality you have to invest more.
NB: Autofocus won't workout accurate on other-mounted lenses, all the time as compared to orginal one. All makes the cam heavier Body+mount+lens
Never had any issues.
Depends on how you treat your gear.
It’s been what? 3-4 years now i use this adapter and these lenses on a regular basis, if not daily, and nothing has been damaged.
@@Tvennet i had lots and lots of friends in photography field they're landscapes photogrpahers, timelapse shooters, wildlife, wedding, potrait, modelling, product shoot, and also especially vloggers who had reviewed this additional mounts as bad and even i can say it. After a week use these mount adapter's connecter portion get wear and tear simply. And it is burden to carry these monts every time. Also, can't clean up shutter side without removing mounts. Also, its heavier than usual, and finally inconsistent while daily use. This is my experience. Thanks anyway for the video.
I can only share my experience and the feedback I got from multiple other people that are using an adapter....and on my side it has never had any issue whether it’s in video or photo, even in rough situations like shooting in a sandy environnement or rain...and it doesn’t really put more weight it’s 10-20gr, that doesn’t make a big difference when shooting handheld but is still to keep in mind when balancing the gimbal...you said « invest in quality » well that’s exactly the point, I invest in lenses I can grow with instead of investing in M lenses that are coming to an end in the next 2 or 3 years. We both have different opinions, I accept yours, but it’s really not my way of thinking when it comes to gear.
Hello, Dani Pedrosa!
Tamron 18-400mm F/3.5-6.3 is worth the money.
In the M6 MKII you don't have a crop and you don't lose the dual pixel auto focus
But you do in the m50.
@@Tvennet yes, but you said in the M6 you did too. Just correcting the miss-information.
I’m human. That happens. I’ll pin a comment on top just to correct this little mistake.
I don't know if you owned any of the Canon M lenses but I think you're 100% incorrect they're very sharp. I own 7 L series lenses from from Canon and I've tried them on my Canon m5 and the m Glass is almost as sharp. I think you need to go back to the drawing board and try the m Glass again before not recommending it. Most people that have m50s and Canon M5 have at least two m-series pieces of glass because they're such good quality and the size is incredibly small so it is great for hiking trips and to carry around for street photography. Just to let you know where I'm coming from I've been shooting professionally for over 30. Ashley use an adapter on my to the viltrox speed booster and just a regular to fit the EF lenses on my M5. I do like to use my EF lenses with my M5 but please try the M glass again.
The issue here is that everyone has his own approach and expectations.
My recommendations are based on my experience and what I'm expecting for what I do after actually going to the drawing board and spending hours watching, reading and testing in store.
Like I said in the video, I don't buy EF-M lenses (but tried them) because I don't want to invest in lenses I can't grow with. And in addition, it's very difficult to sell EF-M lenses (at least on my side of the planet) because it's not a very popular camera system. You'll wonder why I bought the M50 then. The answer is budget. It was the only camera in my budget at that time.
I never said that EF-M lenses are Bad or Horrible, I just said that if you look at the EF-M Range, they're not very fast (except the 3 sigma lenses, a couple of Samyang lenses and the canon 32mm which is 1.4 and the 22mm f2), and most of the zoom lenses have variable aperture.
For photography, well yeah maybe it's good for a majority of people, but for what I am doing, it's not. Not a single lens in the EF-M range for example can compete with the 18-35. None.
And with the recent rumours that are around, the EF-M range is most certainly going to disappear and be replaced by the Crop Censor R camera (regarding the fact that Canon already has a speedbooster that is going to be announced this year).
Everyone has it's own taste, his own preferences, and I don't disagree with you, but it's just not my kind of lenses. And I'm pretty sure, you won't like my next video either...because I actually don't recommend the speedbooster.
In my view anyone buying a M50 or M6 just to use big EF or fast Sigma glass is missing the point. The object of these small mirror less bodies with smaller than FF sensors is portability. With a great majority of photography moving to social media you do not need the added resolution of FF. Instead in many cases a M50 can go where a 5DMkIV can’t. Try hiking the Scottish highlands or the Alps for 7 days with a 5D system on your back.
The best camera is the one you have with you at all times. For many of us it is our mobile phones. The sub 400 gram bodies (M50, XT-30, A6400, etc) with their plastic lenses are a step up from that. Anyone who need more is a professional or wants to be one or can hire a Sherpa to carry their equipment.
In short think of the camera as a SYSTEM. Think that the M in Canon’s M50 or M6 stands for MOBILITY. Mating a 24-70/2.8 or a 300/4 to a M50 defeats THAT object of the M6/M50.
The 11-22, 32/1.4, 22/2, 55-200, and 15-45 kit lens are not the fastest nor are they rugged or weather proof but you can fit a whole 5 lens M series system in the space and weight of a 5D with a 24-70/2,8. And 95% of the time the M system will prove to be more versatile than the 5D with its 24-70/2.8.
In all but the most tricky lighting a M6 with a 22/2 can make for the best street camera. Its unobtrusive, pocketable, and fast enough even for dusk and low light situations. Besides I can use the Canon app to wireless grab the images from my M6/M50 and post to Instagram or Facebook without much trouble. In good light the 11-22 works equally well.
So please think before mating expensive, big, heavy fast glass to a MOBILE ILC camera.
Each his own point of view 🤷🏻♂️ I always followed the « invest in glass » rather than in the camera. I bought the m50 because of it’s price. When it came out, non of the Rebels did have to specs or the budget I was looking after. And like I said, I already owned EFS Lenses. I knew that at some point I would upgrade the camera, and didn’t want to try selling all my gear to start over. And like I mentioned in a previous comment, the after market for M cameras or lenses is very very niche. I get that it is against your point of view and I accept it, but accept that there are also people like me who don’t want to invest exclusively into one system. And in the end, it’s what you do with the gear that matters...
Thomas Vennet fair point. When mirrorless started gaining traction, it was obvious that the EF/EFS mount would have to be discarded for a newer mount primarily because of the lens to sensor distance is much shallower.
Looking down the road, Canon will not be able to support 4 lens systems. EF, EFS, EFM and RF. There just aren’t enough cameras being sold to support so many systems. While there is some excellent EF glass out there, I suspect Canon will replace most of these with RF equivalents. EFM is going to fill a small niche of those who want something more than a mobile phone but don’t want the size, weight and cost of the RF system. EF L glass will always have a market albeit a shrinking one as more RF and EFM glass becomes available. The same will be true of the EFS glass but to a lesser extent.
FYI, I have owned several EFS cameras: including the 20D, 40D, 60D and the 77D. I also still have about 11 EF and EFS lenses. Both zooms like the 24-105/4 and primes like the 50/1.4. There is nothing wrong with these lenses but when I am travelling and weight is a factor, it is the M50 and EFM lenses that I take with me. If I am shooting at home the 5D and 16-35 make more sense but for casual home shooting I find greater use of mobile phones than camera systems.
Currently there is no way to use RF glass on anything but the RF bodies, so collecting RF glass makes little sense, hence I get your desire to collect EF glass. I would not collect EFS glass as I don’t see Canon supporting the EF/EFS systems much longer and EFS glass won’t be able to be used on RF bodies.
Happy shooting.
What about the rf???
RF lenses don’t work with M cameras. And there is no adapter. So no reason to talk about it 🤷🏻♂️
@@Tvennet ohh ok that makes sense.😁
I love my contenporary 56 1.4
\
EF-M 22mm F2 and 32mm F1.4 are solid lenses.
Never said they weren’t. Just, I don’t like EF-M lenses.
@@Tvennet without using them?
Yes, without using them. I’m not investing in lenses I can’t grow in the future with. Reselling efm lenses is not easy. It’s a personal choice. When I bought the Canon M50, I already had EFS and EF lenses, why should I invest in a third lens mount? I never said EFM lenses were bad or horrible, I tested the sigma lenses and they are awesome. The 22mm and 32 are top tier lenses for the M mount...but again...I don’t invest my money in something I can’t grow with. A camera body isn’t forever, lenses are. Imagine buying a canon EOS R but all the lenses you have can’t be used on it, and are hard to sell...but if you like efm lenses, fine, good for you...does that mean that my choice in lenses is bad? No. We just don’t have the same opinion on the gear we prefer to use. This isn’t a video to force anyone to buy this or that lens. It’s a video to express my personal preferences.
@@Tvennet If you have EF and EF-S lenses it of course makes sense to use them. However, when you make recommendations to others you are at a different position.
@@okaro6595 listen. I get your point. You don’t like my opinion and my way of buying gear, fine. But this is my channel, my opinion and my way to recommend gear. You Donny like it, fine, go to another channel.
You want to invest your money in lenses you can’t use one the future? Fine, it’s your money. Now, I invite you to click on the thumbs down right below the video.
I explained 3 times why I personally, me myself don’t want to invest in M lenses and why my recommendation is to not put money in that system, if you don’t like it, fine. Make your own channel and share your recommendations then.
I do not agree with you on many of the EF-M lenses. I have both the M100 and the M6 Mk2. The EF-M 32mm f/1.4, the 22mm f/2.0 amd the 11-22mm f4-5.6 have very good optical quslity. The Sigma 56mm f/1.4 is excellent folliwed by the 16mm f/1.4. One do not need a lot of choices to shoot well. However, some of the L lenses works well too and also the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8.
I think most of the people who comment that they don’t agree didn’t listen what I said, or maybe I said it the wrong way. I never said they are all trash...I say that it’s not a smart move if you consider upgrading in the future. There are some great lenses like you mentioned, but from my point of view, I don’t want to invest in something I can’t grow with. That’s what I call “smart buying”...
And on top of that, I don’t force anyone to agree or to buy anything...I express my opinion and my taste in lenses...everyone has is own perspective or path he wants to follow...mine was buying the m50 because of budget but investing in lenses I can keep...if people want to buy EFM lenses, fair enough, I don’t judge... it’s not my taste, just like preferring Coke over Pepsi...
Some think of the EOS-M system as a "dead end" and thus, should not invest too much on EF-M mount lenses. Well, it need not be the case. I see a future in the EOS-M system beside their full ftame cameras like the R5/6. All one need is a good body or two and a few good lenses. The EOS-M system has survived all these years despite its skeptics. Not many people can afford the new Canon Mirrorless FF cameras. They are still quite big eventhough it is slightly smaller than the DSLRs. Oh, the RF lenses are even larger than many of the DSLR lenses besides having a steep price. No doubt their optical quality is record breaking. From the user point of view, the EOS-M cameras especially the current M6 Mk2 is more than adequate. Its great for travel and street photography due to its smaller size. I have even use the M6 Mk2 with the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 and the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 for studio photography. They are very compact and capable. To use EF-S lenses with an adaptor on the M cameras is possible but will make it much bigger. By the way, i have also bought an EF to EF-M adaptor but have not use it since I own it. Earlier, I was also thinking of using some of my L lenses on my M6 Mk2.
Well, it’s not about being a dead end or not...it’s looking at what plans are at Canon. I mean, even if the M6ii is not that old and the rumored M50ii still coming this year, Canon hasn’t any real plans to release new lenses, third party lenses except sigma and sirui aren’t interested in releasing new lenses, and Canon is going to release an APS-C RF mount camera... is it really still worth investing in the M line? They’re awesome cameras for the budget and size...but I mean, if you’re really knowing you’re going to evolve, that you are planning sooner or later to go with a full frame camera...better invest in glass you can keep. The M system is quite niche (at least, in Europe) and even if I bought the M50 because it was the camera in my budget, I know that it would be almost impossible to sell it for a decent price and glass is also very hard to sell because there aren’t much people using these cameras, or already have the exact same lenses... I personally didn’t care about the size with the lenses, I wanted lenses that would help me shoot what I want, and grow with them...I never said that all EFM lenses are crap. You mention the sigma lenses, the 22 and 32...and I agree, they are great lenses. But not the lenses I personally wanted. Does that mean that my opinion is wrong? No, it’s just my taste...
It makes absolutely no sense to get the 24 mm f/2.8 for EOS M as Canon has faster and better 22 mm f/2.0 natively for EF-M. It is also much more compact.
It makes sense the moment you want to invest in lenses you can keep the day you upgrade your camera out of the M system. I said it in the video. I said it in the comments. And I’ll keep saying it.
And now that the m50 Mkii is out and it is a clear sign of a future end of the EOS M system, I’ll keep saying it even more.
Thanks for watching and sharing your opinion.
nobody shoots in 4K on M50 :D the rolling shutter is just atrocious
You would be very much surprised how many people actually shoot in 4K and how many times I’ve been in an argument telling them it was a bad idea...
Dude u told 50mm is best at the 1st..bt in last u told is not so good ...
Never said it was the best. Where did I say the 50mm is the best...I said it was the most affordable.
And in the end, it’s not a bad lens per se. It’s not my favorite, it’s only my opinion, my recommendations...
not true, the 32mm efm canon lens is amazing... actually better than the 30mm sigma lens.
I never said it wasn’t. I just that I personally don’t like EFM lenses. And except one or two lenses like the 32mm, they’re all zoom lenses with a slow aperture. There’s nothing false in what I said, I just express my preference. If you disagree and you’re happy with the 32mm from canon, good for you, I’m sure you’re doing fantastic work with it. But I, myself, won’t ever invest in EFM lenses.
@@Tvennet What exactly do you dislike about a Sigma 16,30 or 56mm M mount lens? The reviews look good on the 22mm f2 lens by Canon. The kits are good mid-range lenses, and the 15-45mm is only $20 more than buying the body. They also make a super zoom if a person wanted a lens to cover all ranges. If a person owns a lot of Canon glass of the past, then an adapter would be great, no doubt. Do you think the M mount gets abandoned ? The Nikon Z50 adapter for use with APS-C for AFS lenses makes sense too. They have but two native lenses. -Loren lorenschwiderski.smugmug.com/
Hey guys, I think you should listen what I say in the video, I’ve never said that the sigma lenses were bad, neither did I say that this or that lens was bad... All I say is that if you look the list of lenses available (and I can give you the link of all EF-m lenses available) à majority of these lenses are slow zoom lenses with variable aperture. And that is not what I like. And with the exception of the 16-30-56 and like maybe 2 or 3 canon primes, there’s nothing I would buy. But again, this video is MY OPINION if you have a different one and you are happy with your lenses, fair enough. But sorry, for the price of 2 sigma EF-m prime, I can have the sigma 18-35 which is 5 primes, with a Ciné-look, sharper, and where I don’t have to switch between lenses. And why I don’t invest in EF-M lenses? Because I already owned canon glass, that I prefer to buy something I can grow with if I buy a new camera body. But again, you do whatever you want. I know I might have a different approach, but what I need/want isn’t maybe what you need/want, so...
The best lens for EF M is the Canon 32mm. The EF M 6 Mark II has full frame 4K and it has the same autofocus. Please do your homework.
Please do your own homework: there’s a pinned comment where I corrected myself. And no, the 32mm isn’t THE best lens, this is only MY opinion. If you don’t agree, make your own channel and do your own recommendations.
Fairly ignorant video. You know nothing about the good Canon efm lenses - the 32mm for instance, the 11-22 and the 22mm f2 - all excellent lenses. What about the Laowa 9 mm and 65 mm efm lenses? Also, you know nothing about the M6 mk ii - 4k is fine and includes dpaf.
I never said there weren’t good efm lenses, I said I personally wouldn’t invest money in that kind of lenses, because the day you’ll update for another camera, you’ll be stuck with all your efm lenses... and I apologies for the m6ii, you’re right you have dpaf in 4K. Mistakes happen, I’m human. At least you watched it, commented it, and I got the engagement. Thanks for watching ;)
I want to just add one little thing : all these EF-m lenses are also more expensive... the 11-22 is around 399$ (b&h) while the 10-18 is 279. Same goes for the 22mm... so in addition to having lenses you can’t upgrade with, you also pay more... another reason why investing in EF-M isn’t a smart move. But it’s only my personal opinion...
You may well be right about the cost of the Canon efm lenses, but the third party lenses are about the same price as for a Sony mount. As you know, several manufacturers have filled the void. I have the three sigma lenses and a few Laowa lenses, all of which are excellent. I also have the M6 mark ii and don't see Canon abandoning the efm mount anytime soon. By the way, sorry about my attitude!
No worries about the attitude, I understand your point of view. It was only my opinion, and each his own. How’s that M6ii by the way?
The M6/ii is a great camera, except it doesn't have the flippy screen of the M50. I currently use the M50 for vlogging, but am waiting on a Smallrig plate for the M6/ii so I can mount the microphone on the side. With the covid 19 lock down in Australia, haven't been out much to use either camera - only got the M6/ii last week.