@@AjejeB It really doesn't. Pig faeces are too acidic and damages plants. Whilst cow and horse manure help crops, the pig faeces need to be kept away from cultures. Salad is pig shit as much as you are a Sun.
That's what I love about him and his podcast even on disagreements with guests he does not make them uncomfortable instead listens to what they have to say. Out of all the major podcasts on RUclips Joe Rogan might be the most mature out of all of them.
It's not just a professional thing in my opinion. Joe understands that disagreeing with someone doesn't necessarily mean you need to hate them. I have many friends with whom I disagree on many things, doesn't mean I can't have them as friends or treat them with disdain. Within reason...
Oh I think they're both great and no I'm not a conservative Republican. Ben Shapiro is a funny guy. I don't stand with him though. Joe's a riot too but I do believe he gets in over his head debating some of his guests.
Thats because his ego is seperated from his ideas. He can actually have a meaningful discussion disagree and then go get lunch with them. This is why joe is awesome. He lets them lead and plays off it.
I swear it's like ben shapiro can reverse the aging process on some people *he practically turns anyone from the left into children in a matter of minutes*
Matt seemed nervous. He always sort of does in interviews talking about his faith even on Catholic platforms. I do believe Ben is generally more intelligent and well read and certainly is more confident when he is challenged or even given a question in general. I take Walsh to be more of a Conservative Catholic whereas I’m probably the step further to the “right” on that spectrum as a Traditionalist and to be frank it is a position that requires a lot more reading and critical analysis of assessing what is the orthodox position of the Catholic Church as expressed in the Magisterium through history. I do find myself wishing that Matt would do more reading and become firmer in the specifics of his position as dictated by his religion. Ben comes of much more self-assured and frames the question from the outset as different in secular vs religious terms, and positions himself explicitly and early as an orthodox jew whose religious framework is the deterministic factor, and explains from there his own position as the position of his religion specifically. Matt fails to do this and is sort of rhetorically fumbling around with his response and, as far as i remember, failed to situate his own opinion as the Catholic position, the position of a higher authority, that being the body of the Church’s teachings through not just scripture but the Magisterium as well. He really seems to get unstable when discussing these points especially with a more adversarial conversational partner, and is far less confident in asserting his religious position explicitly vs Ben in this clip. For Matt I think educating himself further would help but he does just seem kind of nervous and shaky in his voice (just the same as when he’s appeared on Catholic podcasts and the like - that is to say a non adversarial interview on religion) but native intelligence and reading habits have a huge impact on clarity of speech and depth of understanding religious doctrine. It’s fair that Walsh may not want to be the representative for Christianity or Catholicism at large and that may explain some reticence on his part vs Ben’s confident (characteristic of a lawyer as well, lol) expressive abilities in a dialogue or debate in which he is the interviewee rather than just the interviewer or giving a monologue or the like.
That’s probably because he’s a public figure and wants to be crystal clear when it comes to explaining his stances on controversial topics. Trump doesn’t elaborate very well on his own stances which prompts him to be misunderstood very easily.
@@gibbonbasher8171 More like he obfuscate the issues to make him sound smart. He constantly engages in fallacies, two of his favorite are False Equivalency and Equivocation Fallacies. He throws in an example of Adultery to justify his opposition to gay rights (False Equivalency Fallacy). He also defines the terms he uses (In his own interpretation), than uses that term to justify his logical argument (Equivocation). And finally, Circular Reasoning, he's basically saying nothing throughout this video to either support or reject the legal claim to gay rights by bring up religious interpretations. He basically says "God is right so who are we to argue it" but humans are also fallible so its unlikely that God's word as written is correct....so where does that leave us???
@@josephschneider9 The only issue with your claim that humans misinterpreted God's word when they were writing the Bible is that homosexuality is explicitly condemned multiple times throughout the New Testament.
@@gibbonbasher8171 More like, the word of god cannot be voiced by man and our worldly desires are a gift from god (Why else would he design us to have them?). As long as it doesn't break the Golden Rule, why would God restrict activities that would makes us happy? Its a human interpretation of God's will, and thus is not god's will.
Fantastic conversation. So much respect between both of them even though they may disagree. I love how joe always asked questions to try and understand others people reasoning. So refreshing
This show literally shows us how to have these kinds of conversations. It’s called Conflict Hotline. This episode is called Political Differences. Brilliant. m.ruclips.net/video/lqPNfjpxol0/видео.html
It really blows my mind when I hear anyone try to spew that 'being gay is a choice' bullshit - which I'm really glad neither of them believe. But as a gay person, I've often found myself having this conversation: Them: Being gay is a choice Me: Oh it is? So basically you're saying you could wake up tomorrow, say I'm gay, and actually change whom you're attracted to? Them: Well no, because I'm straight. Me: You're not answering my question, lol
Now of days, it’s hard to distinguish who’s naturally gay or just “gay” to seek attention… Gay has been around since ancient times, it’s biblical. The point is to deny debauchery. Same goes for a straight man indulging in lust.
I don't think you understood Ben's point. He basically said being gay is a choice. While being attracted to men is not choice, living as a gay person is a choice. That is no different in practice from saying being gay is a choice. He just worded it in a way that avoids directly saying it.
@@nuknukisdead What a shame - even though politically we don't see eye to eye, I've always had respect for him. Didn't think he was THIS big of a moron
mainstream media is absolute garbage. CNN and Fox news and all others are only there to perpetuate the status quo and keep people mindlessly enraged at the wrong aspects of society while the 1% keep on funneling money to the top.
In a sense, they are in the same group-people who are willing to have a civil conversation even if they disagree. That's becoming increasingly rare these days...
@@sixsideddeath5529 His "feelings on the topic" differ from the person he's having a discussion with (Joe) so technically this is a debate you fool. A debate doesn't have to be a "fight", it's two people discussing something they disagree upon!
@@deepakbisht1327 No it isnt, this is just a discussion. Nobody is trying to come out on top, nobody is trying to change the mind of the audience. Joe asked why he disagreed with him on the concept of gay marriage, because in legislation Ben isnt against, and so he explained it to him. A debate isnt you just disagreeing with a friend on a topic. If it is for you, your friends must find you insufferable.
@@sixsideddeath5529 Ok then, agree to disagree. Because debating about whether something is a debate or not is probably not worth it. But I think that's how debates should be - A healthy discussion where two people are trying to find what's best for the betterment of all rather than trying to "win" or come out on top.
I love how Joe interviews. Respectful and intellectual conversation. I do understand BOTH views. I agree more with Ben. It's cool we can talk about it. Freely.
robert broadley Totally agree. He is so good at respectfully discussing divisive topics and standing his ground. He’s good at agreeing to disagree. Even when I don’t agree with Joe, I like him. I’d love to have a beer with him.
The point of a debate, or discussing different opinions and ideas is to learn from another perspective. Turning one into a shouting match becomes more like "no, I'm right, you're an idiot!" I've learned a great deal from sitting down and talking to people who have views that differ from my own.
Why not also follow all the other things they say in the old testament. Not only the gay thing. But wearing two materials . Eating shellfish. Stoning people. Etc. Why just follow the gay thing if the book is the ultimate moral standing for you
True But it's sooo hard to stay calm when somebody is so wrong in such basics because of things like religion or tradition And it's even harder if the person is smart enough that he should have figured this out already
love how i got a more better understanding on Jewish views on homosexuality in a 20 min clip of a Joe Rogan podcast than 2 years of learning religion in school 🤣
Did u know his wife’s a doctor? Edit: To all the people who keep trying to correct me and calling me an “idiot”, this reply was supposed to be taken as a joke. Thank you.
@@dawndavenport9139 Cancel culture is at the forefront of liberal groups, it is normalized and even the expected behavior inside the circle. Conservative groups are flawed in many, many, many ways, but cancel culture doesn’t seem to me to be as prevalent compared to liberal groups. What is ultimately good from Joe is that he has a very varied point of view in many things, and that’s ok. Most people should try and do that, make their own opinions and think for themselves.
Sin is the answer. We live in a fallen world, so we have flawed attractions. I'm a gay man but I recognise my attraction is flawed, so I choose not to act on it. I was born with it so it is not a choice but it is a choice to act on it.
"Hey ben ,how have you been?" Ben Shapiro:well are you asking from my perspective or in the veiw of the world becuase if you mean from my perspective then right now i would have to say ive been doing alright throughout the past few days
+Novemdecillion Let’s say hypothetically that you put the sauce on the side. And let’s say that while I’m trying to eat my meal, I drop my fork in the sauce. Now at this point, I hypothetically am dealing with a fork that is covered in sauce and a meal on my plate that I have not finished. What is a rational and fair-minded person to do in this situation? Do you really want to put your customers in that kind of situation, Brenda? Then I think you know the answer to that question.
Canada 🇨🇦 Live He feels the same way on lots of other issues though. He doesn’t like weed but he’s pro it’s legalization. I don’t understand why the idea of not wanting to ban everything you don’t like is so hard to understand for some people.
The discussion here was excellent. Two guys, with opposing opinions, speaking calmly and intellectually w/o cursing, shouting and making disparaging comments about each other. THIS is how it should be done. Kudos to both of them....
Ben Shapiro is literally arguing that gay people are lesser and aren't worthy of having the same basic civil rights. You should also know Ben Shapiro ridiculed the Lawrence Vs Texas decision a decade after it banned states from making homosexuality illegal. The dude is a depraved lunatic.
@@tristanbarrilleaux5535 , no, he argues that government shouldn't be in the business of marriage, which means he opposes the actual decision that made gay marriage a constitutional right. He is being misleading about his position. Also people who have homophobic or racist or any other kind of prejudiced belief because of their religion should find better interpretations. That isn't a good excuse to have irrational prejudices against people.
im a gay man and when it comes to religion and marriage I myself have the belief that there were some inequalities that needed addressing but that fundimentally it was up to people of faith, who follow the faith and everything ben said about the faith systems to decide what is or isnt in the eyes of god sort of thing. but then im an athiest thats not in the least bit concerned about marriage either way
Jordan Peterson does the same thing, too. Expends a great deal of mental energy trying to square ideas with a religious perspective he'd do well to just step outside of.
Rogan: “Don’t you think that’s why religious text says not to eat pork?” Shapiro: “I’m not a big fan of naturalistic explanations for religion.” One Minute Later Shapiro: “The red sea split because of a strong eastern wind.”
I caught that too. Ben seems like a great guy but the cherry picking is the problem with any religion. Ben would still be a great guy without religion. He just can't understand why.
@Bad Cattitude Because cherry picking. Also, why is this never brought up: suppose a strong wind (tornado or whatever) parted any sea. How in the hell (that doesn't exist) are people going to walk through that?
@@gleep1905 bro, jesus apparently rose from the dead. Dont be getting all logical on the bible, torah qu'uran or any religious scripture from 1000s of years ago. Take then metaphorically not literally
@@cleshsesh6155 Yes well that is my point. Either everything in these books is metaphorical (thus open to interpretation) or it is not. They circumvent this by cherry picking. And worse still, nobody cherry picks the same things. This alone should be a red flag brighter than an active quasar. If a god exists, he is watching galaxies collide. I doubt it cares much about different coloured primates gathering in a building each week or which of them is sticking whatever into whoever.
GREAT DISCOURSE!!!!! One of the best ones I’ve seen on this topic. One thing that sounded a miss to me though is the pop culture/quasi-scientific belief that people (essentially babies) are “BORN with a set sexuality”. I do not find this to be true. If so, then the science should be utilized/showcased time and time again, rather than anecdotal tales of “sexual realization” and using quasi-scientific/pop culture phrases to validate it. We are ALL born INNOCENT (for the most part) with sexual organs that are designed to operate with each other. Are we allowed to use them whatever we want to/with whomever we choose to? ABSOLUTELY! But until the science is verified concerning the sexuality of babies, we must ALL do our part to disallow these phrases from our spaces (AND minds) until we otherwise see fit.
I noticed that too. Ben is so used to debates and people talking over him or dismissing him that he has adapted this state of tension even in lighthearted conversations.
@@glowrillaz and he is all for it. An argument from joe wont spark anything. Ben will just make points constantly. He debates. This isnt anything new for him to be disagreed with.
Matt Clark Even though Joe was arguing, Ben agreed with most of view, conceding that he has no reason to shun gay people/marriage besides religious covenants.
Joe is great at not pushing too hard when he starts to nail a guest down on a point - he eases up and allows the conversation to flow comfortably. Despite the occasional BS, I am always so impressed by Shapiro's intelligence and sharpness. Nice convo to witness
@@mulder938 Not sure if you're sarcastic or don't get the comment. Dunking on people only 5 years removed from growing there first pubic hair in a political argument is just as pathetic as if I would go up to a 10 Year Old, dunk on him in a Basketball Match and think I'm some sort of an NBA Superstar.
People really need to watch this, you can have person beliefs and disagreements without that meaning that people should have to conform to your will or restrict others
This sounds like it comes from someone who doesn't have any religious beliefs. If you watch a lot of Been Shapiro speeches, he rarely brings up religion, this conversation it seems unavoidable to bring up religion since he is a heavily religious person. Certain topics such as Abortion, I have never seen Ben use the Torah or the Bible in his arguments, unless someone asking him a question at the end of his talks that brings religion up.
@@theelephantintheroom69 I've watched approximately 10 of his full speech videos which are somewhere from 1.5 to 2 hours long and in any of those videos , i don't recall him citing Exodus, Deuteronomy, Psalms or any part of the Old Testament that would back up any of his political beliefs. Like I said in my past comment, when people have tried to use Scripture to justify their political views or they have heard someone else has and they bring that up to him at the end of his speeches is the only times I have heard him speak on religion. It seems like you know in enough that you should know this, so I don't see your point in the way you replied.
Joe Rogan is the kind of guy who can disagree with you on many things but still doesn't make you feel like a horrible person for having differing beliefs. This is the best way to have tough and important conversations.
I try to roll like Joe with all these challenging situation’s in the world today. It really works to be mellow when talking to people plus I smoke weed also.❤💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨👋😊
I would argue that you’re giving him too much credit. The reason he can be so chill is because he doesn’t ACTALLY care. It doesn’t affect him. But change the subject to weed and watch him fly off the handle.
I really respect how Joe can engage with a difficult topic and have some meaningful dialogue out of it. Even though he doesn't agree with a lot of the points raised, he still has a constructive conversation.
Agree 100%. This is how I have engaged in debate all my life. It's also how I imagined debate should be. Not to win but to learn and grow. Truth is, I'm gay but I find it fascinating how the religious think AND I find it even more interesting how they rationalize and are still accepting of gay people in the modern world. I have no hate for their beliefs. On the contrary, I enjoy learning reasonable, everyday people's reasoning for why they hold them. Most of them don't have any special hate for gays they just don't have a personal experience into that perspective. We all need to appreciate that point.
tookings I feel the same way but from the other perspective lol, honestly the only standpoint on it I have is that sex outside of marriage is a sin, so sure two men or women or whomever having sex is a sin, but so is a man and a woman having sex outside of marriage🤷🏻♂️ I donno I think people forget the fact that everyone sins so if ya wanna criticize someone for theirs become perfect first lol
They're not disagreeing here? as far as laws go at least. Ben is just saying that according to his morality to stick to his religious beliefs, he cannot condone the act. Doesn't mean he thinks it's to be shunned, made illegal, or the sort.
If it only for reperduction then how does he only have three kids in 15 years of being married, unless they have only had physical intimacy three times
I feel bad for his wife. At that point I couldn’t blame her for cheating. And when they did have sex there probably wasn’t any foreplay and he busted after 2 minutes of missionary. That’s an embarrassing sex life 😂. How can you choose religion over sex WHEN YOU‘RE IN A RELATIONSHIP??????? It’s fucked up that religion tells teens they’re wrong for masturbating and having sex. As a teen you’re horny 24/7. i‘m so glad that religion is basically non existent in Europe
Yeah it's his show. He manipulates it the way he wants. He asks questions in a way that corners shapiro like he's really saying " you really believe in god??? You really believe in miracles???" Because Shapiro's convictions are more towards rules than actually faith he stumbles when answering. I would be like " yup! I believe that moses parted the red sea! I believe in miracles! I believe it all!" And just let it be a discussion of belief and unbelief...which is essentially what it is
This conversation should be how all conversations go. Tons of questions. Lots of listening. Respect from both ends. Maybe not a lot of agreeing, but that is free will and inclusion. Everyone should be able to have different opinions and be able to express them without being cancelled. If someone expressing an extreme opinion they should be able to be heard why they think that way. Then they should listen to the counter argument so maybe we could come to mutual understanding and common ground for living in the same society.
I disagree this is a calm conversation. Shapiro is always under some pressure and sounds angry. You can also notice by his mimic and colour of his face.
Joe is a great interviewer. He can totally disagree with someone and still have a calm collective conversation. This is how it should be. Just two people sharing ideas learning different point of views from each other. This is why Joe is the number one podcast.
I think the problem here is that society has had a horrible understanding of a conversation. Now days you cant even say fat, without having 20 people coming at you mad and insulted.
@@chrism8311 Shapiro said so himself, he doesn’t care what other people do. It’s just a rule in respective religions that you can’t be gay if you follow that religion. He explicitly said “I’m not trying to convert anyone”
@@chrism8311 "How can you respect someone with views like that..." And his argument would hold the same weight if he said the same thing about you. "How could i respect someone that promotes sinful behaviour?"... this type of thinking is far more dangerous than what his actual beliefs are. And yeah, i totally disagree with everything he says... at least i was able to hear it without someone shouting bigot and other insults...
That’s what he is saying. He doesn’t care. But him going to the party of two gay men is supporting a sinful event in his eyes. It’s not that he cares if they bang eachother it’s that he would knowingly be sinning by going to the party.
Yeah, Joe did a great job. It's his job to ask the difficult questions. I think Ben also answered well, though obviously some people in the comments still misunderstood.
@@LukeNorther it's really not amazing, dialogue like this should be the standard. Instead we get discussions and when people disagree they throw hissy fits
i feel like more christians should have the approach that ben and most other jews have. "do whatever you like, the government shouldn't get involved. but if you want to be a part of *our* religion, there's rules"
As a gay man I agree with that. I don’t want to force other people to conform to my worldview but I also don’t want to be actively harassed or disrespected.
Joe Rogan beautifully asks the tough questions. And Ben answers honestly, he is strong in his faith. I love this debate because it’s two so contrasting views and they have a civil conversation. Great learning
Honestly I believe the way people feel and/or think--Their personality I guess--does affect how they look as they grow up. It kinda makes sense because you hold your body language which includes facial expressions by how you feel and what you think and your muscles must grow in to those suspensions as you grow. To me he looks as though he was always told he was correct - which I think he is alot of the time - and had a very sheltered childhood. That's why I think he always looks smug. Not hating here dudes... Just a theory of somebody who's studied biology at a university level but has never done any sort of research on this particular matter... In fact I think my education didn't even touch on any sort of matter like this. :)
I’m happy now and living as my authentic self. I also feel closer to God now, not trying to be someone I’m not. Being with a woman felt wrong. Like I was doing something i wasn’t supposed to be doing. But now I am happy.
3:58 - Religion fundamentally rejects the idea that you are driven to do something; therefore it is your identity. Therefore, you get to participate in a behavior. Well said, Ben.
Ben Shapiro always looks like hes about to duel someone in yugioh
😂😂 spot on
that reminds me.. the look the kid gave me when he beat me in yugioh, never played it again
Ahaha I can see it
Swam whats yugioh?
Some anime bullshit?
Joe Rogan tries to get Ben Shapiro to marry him for 20 mins
fuck you I was training abs yesterday and laughing hurts badly
😄😄
I giggled
@@decespugliatorenucleare3780 i feel you, same thing happens to me
😂
"It's pig shit"
"Yeah, that's not kosher either"
I laughed out loud at that
Me too. I was looking for your comment, as I knew someone else had caught it too 😂
Yeah, made me lol. I was a bit disappointed that Joe didn't laugh.
Pig shit goes in the ground and eventually becomes salad
@@AjejeB It really doesn't. Pig faeces are too acidic and damages plants. Whilst cow and horse manure help crops, the pig faeces need to be kept away from cultures. Salad is pig shit as much as you are a Sun.
@@jaysoniorg2950 75% of the jokes go over joes bald head
I love that they can still laugh even when debating a controversial topic.
i think they are being ironic, from my point of view i think they really don't like each other.
Trunp 2024 f*ck your feelings!!
@@rolandocedillo5685 damn that’s cringe 😂
@@rolandocedillo5685 ?
I love how joe rogan isn’t afraid of conflict but can still be so laid back and respectful
Unless it's Steven Crowder
That's what I love about him and his podcast even on disagreements with guests he does not make them uncomfortable instead listens to what they have to say. Out of all the major podcasts on RUclips Joe Rogan might be the most mature out of all of them.
@@ghostthred7002 lol yea he really lost his shit with crowder
It was over weed tho so he had to be angry
He has a million times said that's the whole point of the podcast.
Fighting gave him this edge
I like how joe is so nice, and not mean. He disagrees with Ben, but he doesn’t become nasty.
He's not nice he's a professional.
It's not just a professional thing in my opinion. Joe understands that disagreeing with someone doesn't necessarily mean you need to hate them. I have many friends with whom I disagree on many things, doesn't mean I can't have them as friends or treat them with disdain. Within reason...
Oh I think they're both great and no I'm not a conservative Republican. Ben Shapiro is a funny guy. I don't stand with him though. Joe's a riot too but I do believe he gets in over his head debating some of his guests.
Thats because his ego is seperated from his ideas. He can actually have a meaningful discussion disagree and then go get lunch with them. This is why joe is awesome. He lets them lead and plays off it.
I swear it's like ben shapiro can reverse the aging process on some people
*he practically turns anyone from the left into children in a matter of minutes*
He answered this a lot better than Matt Walsh. I don't know why Matt had a difficult time with Joe when they had this same discussion
Matt seemed nervous. He always sort of does in interviews talking about his faith even on Catholic platforms. I do believe Ben is generally more intelligent and well read and certainly is more confident when he is challenged or even given a question in general.
I take Walsh to be more of a Conservative Catholic whereas I’m probably the step further to the “right” on that spectrum as a Traditionalist and to be frank it is a position that requires a lot more reading and critical analysis of assessing what is the orthodox position of the Catholic Church as expressed in the Magisterium through history. I do find myself wishing that Matt would do more reading and become firmer in the specifics of his position as dictated by his religion. Ben comes of much more self-assured and frames the question from the outset as different in secular vs religious terms, and positions himself explicitly and early as an orthodox jew whose religious framework is the deterministic factor, and explains from there his own position as the position of his religion specifically. Matt fails to do this and is sort of rhetorically fumbling around with his response and, as far as i remember, failed to situate his own opinion as the Catholic position, the position of a higher authority, that being the body of the Church’s teachings through not just scripture but the Magisterium as well. He really seems to get unstable when discussing these points especially with a more adversarial conversational partner, and is far less confident in asserting his religious position explicitly vs Ben in this clip. For Matt I think educating himself further would help but he does just seem kind of nervous and shaky in his voice (just the same as when he’s appeared on Catholic podcasts and the like - that is to say a non adversarial interview on religion) but native intelligence and reading habits have a huge impact on clarity of speech and depth of understanding religious doctrine. It’s fair that Walsh may not want to be the representative for Christianity or Catholicism at large and that may explain some reticence on his part vs Ben’s confident (characteristic of a lawyer as well, lol) expressive abilities in a dialogue or debate in which he is the interviewee rather than just the interviewer or giving a monologue or the like.
@@marguerillasome people just feel they shouldnt be speaking on God's behalf with such questions presented to them.
"BBQ the next day?" was the hardest question Ben has ever had to answer in his career
Waitress: What can i get you?
Ben Shapiro: From a secular perspective or from a hunger perspective?
SDSUMIGUEL
Waitress: from a hunger perspective
Ben: Actually, no, from a secular perspective
@@stephen5601 LMAO
do u know the difference and it’s importance?
@@michael5147
@@vexboo4250 If you think what i said was anywhere near smart and not common knowledge then boy do i have news for you
Ben talks like he’s trying to max out the word count on his essays
So let's say
Hypothetically
That’s probably because he’s a public figure and wants to be crystal clear when it comes to explaining his stances on controversial topics. Trump doesn’t elaborate very well on his own stances which prompts him to be misunderstood very easily.
@@gibbonbasher8171 More like he obfuscate the issues to make him sound smart. He constantly engages in fallacies, two of his favorite are False Equivalency and Equivocation Fallacies. He throws in an example of Adultery to justify his opposition to gay rights (False Equivalency Fallacy). He also defines the terms he uses (In his own interpretation), than uses that term to justify his logical argument (Equivocation). And finally, Circular Reasoning, he's basically saying nothing throughout this video to either support or reject the legal claim to gay rights by bring up religious interpretations. He basically says "God is right so who are we to argue it" but humans are also fallible so its unlikely that God's word as written is correct....so where does that leave us???
@@josephschneider9 The only issue with your claim that humans misinterpreted God's word when they were writing the Bible is that homosexuality is explicitly condemned multiple times throughout the New Testament.
@@gibbonbasher8171 More like, the word of god cannot be voiced by man and our worldly desires are a gift from god (Why else would he design us to have them?). As long as it doesn't break the Golden Rule, why would God restrict activities that would makes us happy? Its a human interpretation of God's will, and thus is not god's will.
Fantastic conversation. So much respect between both of them even though they may disagree. I love how joe always asked questions to try and understand others people reasoning. So refreshing
"Jamie, pull up a picture of two gay men kissing a bear"
Joe Rogan: "So if a gay man was on DMT..."
😅
If a gay man was on DMT would you or would you not feed him elk meat?
@@sentientmlem727 and what if the elk has been cooked to 145° ... That's a.. that's a natural thing that they didn't know about so is that ok?
zarreff ... he’d become straight
So if a gay man was on DMT, what hairstyle would be the first to notice?
Imagine talking about different beliefs while still having a productive conversation. Things progress when you don't demonize people.
I AGREE.
100%
Big facts
This show literally shows us how to have these kinds of conversations. It’s called Conflict Hotline. This episode is called Political Differences. Brilliant.
m.ruclips.net/video/lqPNfjpxol0/видео.html
@@barbatvs8959 that was.... oddly specific
“Why would it be bad to eat pigs? Jesus love pigs? Is that it?” Made me laugh
*The level of professionalism of these gentlemen is so rare these days.*
Joe “it’s pretty clear that people are gay” Rogan
Pillow biters.
I read this the exact moment he said it.
@@TonkaGoldman-xd5iw all gay guys are bottoms?
Lmao i was like no-
Ben "there's no commandment not to take your head and shove it in a meat grinder" Shapiro
This is like watching one guy who smoked some great weed have a great discussion with a guy on adderal. Fascinating.
That couldn't be more accurate
Brilliant observation!
this literally IS that
An astute observation
lmfao you’re right i just realized ben shapiro always seems like he’s on adderall
A great example of how religion conflicts with common sense and reality!
It really blows my mind when I hear anyone try to spew that 'being gay is a choice' bullshit - which I'm really glad neither of them believe. But as a gay person, I've often found myself having this conversation:
Them: Being gay is a choice
Me: Oh it is? So basically you're saying you could wake up tomorrow, say I'm gay, and actually change whom you're attracted to?
Them: Well no, because I'm straight.
Me: You're not answering my question, lol
Now of days, it’s hard to distinguish who’s naturally gay or just “gay” to seek attention…
Gay has been around since ancient times, it’s biblical. The point is to deny debauchery. Same goes for a straight man indulging in lust.
I don't think you understood Ben's point. He basically said being gay is a choice. While being attracted to men is not choice, living as a gay person is a choice.
That is no different in practice from saying being gay is a choice. He just worded it in a way that avoids directly saying it.
@@nuknukisdead What a shame - even though politically we don't see eye to eye, I've always had respect for him. Didn't think he was THIS big of a moron
I love that the media puts Ben and Joe in the same group when they are fundamentally different
mainstream media is absolute garbage. CNN and Fox news and all others are only there to perpetuate the status quo and keep people mindlessly enraged at the wrong aspects of society while the 1% keep on funneling money to the top.
Joe tries to stay center which is why he’s such a great person to talk to
@@nicholasschweizer2997 it's sad how true that is.....
In a sense, they are in the same group-people who are willing to have a civil conversation even if they disagree. That's becoming increasingly rare these days...
I don't love that, but I appreciate that you pointed out these incongruous facts.
Ben Shapiro going from "Facts don't care about your feelings" to "according to the Bible" in 0.0001 seconds
He isnt arguing against gay marriage, he's just explaining his feelings on the topic. This isnt a debate dumbass, Joe is just asking questions
@@sixsideddeath5529 His "feelings on the topic" differ from the person he's having a discussion with (Joe) so technically this is a debate you fool. A debate doesn't have to be a "fight", it's two people discussing something they disagree upon!
@@deepakbisht1327 No it isnt, this is just a discussion. Nobody is trying to come out on top, nobody is trying to change the mind of the audience. Joe asked why he disagreed with him on the concept of gay marriage, because in legislation Ben isnt against, and so he explained it to him. A debate isnt you just disagreeing with a friend on a topic. If it is for you, your friends must find you insufferable.
He's right, because facts don't care about HIS feelings...
For some of us though, our feelings are actually based on facts.
@@sixsideddeath5529 Ok then, agree to disagree. Because debating about whether something is a debate or not is probably not worth it. But I think that's how debates should be - A healthy discussion where two people are trying to find what's best for the betterment of all rather than trying to "win" or come out on top.
This thumbnail goes hard.
That was a great conversation.
ben shapiro always sounds like he’s doing an impression of himself
I mean, isn't that technically how we all always sound? Haha
Not in his case 😂
LMAOOO
This is the best coment I've ever read oml
It's so true 😂
The thumbnail looks like Ben just told his plan for taking over the world to Joe and Joe’s terrified
holy fuck i spat on my monitor
Haha I fucking died 😂
Thank u very much for that. Made my day
😂😂😂🤣
CHAOSCANDIDATE Are you stupid?
The ending was wild😂
I love how Joe interviews. Respectful and intellectual conversation.
I do understand BOTH views. I agree more with Ben. It's cool we can talk about it. Freely.
Joes ability to keep a convo going with varied personalities and keep it civil and interesting is nice.
robert broadley Totally agree. He is so good at respectfully discussing divisive topics and standing his ground. He’s good at agreeing to disagree. Even when I don’t agree with Joe, I like him. I’d love to have a beer with him.
Yeah you're a twerp. Joe is lucky to be in the room with Ben.
I adore joe for that reason
The point of a debate, or discussing different opinions and ideas is to learn from another perspective. Turning one into a shouting match becomes more like "no, I'm right, you're an idiot!" I've learned a great deal from sitting down and talking to people who have views that differ from my own.
@@samuelmorse784 Ben was invited to be Joe's guest. I wouldn't call that "lucky".
Joe trying to convince Ben to have a threesom for 20 mins -straight-
perfect comment
ffs 😂 😂
Underrated comment lmao
Nohomo tho
Hope Lee That’s a pun
Why not also follow all the other things they say in the old testament. Not only the gay thing. But wearing two materials . Eating shellfish. Stoning people. Etc. Why just follow the gay thing if the book is the ultimate moral standing for you
Because those are Old Testament laws
@@aureum7479 so is the gay thing
Kudos to both for respecting to each other
You can totally disagree with someone and still treat them with respect and be on good terms. Some people are forgetting this.
You’re beautiful Laura!!
It's pretty easy to do when you're not discussing your own rights
Sadly people’s ego are on the way
Blame Fox 'News'
True
But it's sooo hard to stay calm when somebody is so wrong in such basics because of things like religion or tradition
And it's even harder if the person is smart enough that he should have figured this out already
Ben sounds like he only does the missionary position.
And has only had sex twice haha
And he talks the whole time
And he gives his opinions on same-sex relationships the whole time
Definitely has sex through a hole in a sheet
No he sounds like he tried missionary and decided to research a better way to do it
Ben always with the loo of The Fallen Angel painting by Alexandre Cabanel
Bro is dribbling this question like a mfing basketball
Joe “gay dudes are really good at interior design” Rogan.
😂 😂
It's not a stereotype if it's always true.
@@ohf3594 its raw rock hard facts
@@ohf3594 It's not 100 percent true so therefore it's a stereotype
Arnold Eli haha the DMT video is what took me here lol. Joe smokes frog spit lol
Interesting fact: Ben Shapiro is actually voiced by Justin Roiland
Facts don't care about your feelings, Morty!
😂😂
I can't unsee it
MrLolmaster101 stop
Ahh geeezzz.
These Two SHOULD Have a Show…. Beautiful Debate…🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
love how i got a more better understanding on Jewish views on homosexuality in a 20 min clip of a Joe Rogan podcast than 2 years of learning religion in school 🤣
Ben Shapiro sounds like he’d be in a gay marriage if he met the right guy.
Did u know his wife’s a doctor?
Edit: To all the people who keep trying to correct me and calling me an “idiot”, this reply was supposed to be taken as a joke. Thank you.
Fluffy Bunny nice! 😂
@@yasminaburger1957 he is beta ass shit
Fluffy Bunny bro so many dudes are gay and married to women with kids. I dont think hes gay but that excuse has no ground
Chavez Poindexter r/whooooosh
Conservative or liberal , the laid back energy that joe has is something all of us should strive for in all debates
Joe Rogan is a liberal, but also a Patriot and normal person. Woke left hate him tho
Fact: Joe and Ben are close friends irl
Its funny , im liberal and our side tends to not tolerate joe . But he has alot of liberal views, and conservatives dont seem tonhate him .. odd .
@@dawndavenport9139 Cancel culture is at the forefront of liberal groups, it is normalized and even the expected behavior inside the circle. Conservative groups are flawed in many, many, many ways, but cancel culture doesn’t seem to me to be as prevalent compared to liberal groups.
What is ultimately good from Joe is that he has a very varied point of view in many things, and that’s ok. Most people should try and do that, make their own opinions and think for themselves.
@@Reibaku republicans have been using cancel culture since the 90s
Yeah, it's a shame people can't debate like this
"It's actually pig sh*t"
"Yeah that's not Kosher either"
great conversation
Ben Shapiro looks like that kid that reminds the teacher to give homework
LOL
He looks like every nieghbours kid
@Anirudh what????
So true lol
Sounds like him too
Joe “you’re gonna shtoop this guy and he’s going to shtoop you” Rogan
dead xD
LMAO
i like the way ben shapiro argues his point, he mentions the different view points that influence him; ending this off with his own personal opinion
Sin is the answer. We live in a fallen world, so we have flawed attractions. I'm a gay man but I recognise my attraction is flawed, so I choose not to act on it. I was born with it so it is not a choice but it is a choice to act on it.
Ben Shapiro is actually a lesbian woman
Hahahaha gold
Actually gis'd a genderless alien.
Have you heard his wife is a doctor?
Havanaday ok.........
@@havanaday9981 I've known some pretty fucking useless trash Doctors.
"Hey ben ,how have you been?"
Ben Shapiro:well are you asking from my perspective or in the veiw of the world becuase if you mean from my perspective then right now i would have to say ive been doing alright throughout the past few days
Ben Shapiro's the kind of guy to gish gallop a waitress when she asks him if he wants the sauce on the side.
+Novemdecillion Let’s say hypothetically that you put the sauce on the side. And let’s say that while I’m trying to eat my meal, I drop my fork in the sauce. Now at this point, I hypothetically am dealing with a fork that is covered in sauce and a meal on my plate that I have not finished. What is a rational and fair-minded person to do in this situation? Do you really want to put your customers in that kind of situation, Brenda? Then I think you know the answer to that question.
Exactly. It’s how people appear neutral when they are against gay marriage but don’t want anyone to know.
Canada 🇨🇦 Live He feels the same way on lots of other issues though. He doesn’t like weed but he’s pro it’s legalization. I don’t understand why the idea of not wanting to ban everything you don’t like is so hard to understand for some people.
And Joe took 7 seconds to say that while Ben took 4 second to say that.
The way a debate should be conducted ❤ controversial topic, two calm speakers ❤
8:54 this always gets me! 😂🤣😂👍
Letme just show you the paperwork
Ben "2.5 speed" Shapiro
Watch this on .75 speed, Ben seems so chill and talks at a typical speed LOL.
Haha I totally thought I was accidentally fasting forward! 🤣
@@terminalvelocity4858 Haha Joe sounds like he's either stupid drunk or stoned
Lol. This one was actually worth it
The discussion here was excellent. Two guys, with opposing opinions, speaking calmly and intellectually w/o cursing, shouting and making disparaging comments about each other. THIS is how it should be done. Kudos to both of them....
But the comment section is brain dead
Online comment sections are always the complete opposite
Ben Shapiro is literally arguing that gay people are lesser and aren't worthy of having the same basic civil rights. You should also know Ben Shapiro ridiculed the Lawrence Vs Texas decision a decade after it banned states from making homosexuality illegal. The dude is a depraved lunatic.
@@nevetsdsa1564 he’s Jewish? That’s his religion? He agrees they should have the same rights politically. Did you even watch the video?
@@tristanbarrilleaux5535 , no, he argues that government shouldn't be in the business of marriage, which means he opposes the actual decision that made gay marriage a constitutional right. He is being misleading about his position. Also people who have homophobic or racist or any other kind of prejudiced belief because of their religion should find better interpretations. That isn't a good excuse to have irrational prejudices against people.
I also like how he says he doesn’t care what people do, but then he votes and supports crazies who want to take others rights away…
im a gay man and when it comes to religion and marriage I myself have the belief that there were some inequalities that needed addressing but that fundimentally it was up to people of faith, who follow the faith and everything ben said about the faith systems to decide what is or isnt in the eyes of god sort of thing. but then im an athiest thats not in the least bit concerned about marriage either way
Two parts of Ben's brains are fighting his traditionalism and his rationality
@Jason Ullerich yeah, he's a smart guy, but I feel like he's stuck between religion and logic, I was there once
The perpetual clash of Fundamentalism and Contextualism
@@RandomDude4268 exactly
Ben Shapiro and logic? A strange concept
Jordan Peterson does the same thing, too. Expends a great deal of mental energy trying to square ideas with a religious perspective he'd do well to just step outside of.
Rogan: “Don’t you think that’s why religious text says not to eat pork?”
Shapiro: “I’m not a big fan of naturalistic explanations for religion.”
One Minute Later
Shapiro: “The red sea split because of a strong eastern wind.”
I caught that too. Ben seems like a great guy but the cherry picking is the problem with any religion. Ben would still be a great guy without religion. He just can't understand why.
@Bad Cattitude Because cherry picking. Also, why is this never brought up: suppose a strong wind (tornado or whatever) parted any sea. How in the hell (that doesn't exist) are people going to walk through that?
@@gleep1905 bro, jesus apparently rose from the dead. Dont be getting all logical on the bible, torah qu'uran or any religious scripture from 1000s of years ago. Take then metaphorically not literally
@@cleshsesh6155 Yes well that is my point. Either everything in these books is metaphorical (thus open to interpretation) or it is not. They circumvent this by cherry picking. And worse still, nobody cherry picks the same things. This alone should be a red flag brighter than an active quasar. If a god exists, he is watching galaxies collide. I doubt it cares much about different coloured primates gathering in a building each week or which of them is sticking whatever into whoever.
He said he had a secular point of view to hate gays but there Is no secular point of view lmao
Best collab ive ever seen
GREAT DISCOURSE!!!!!
One of the best ones I’ve seen on this topic. One thing that sounded a miss to me though is the pop culture/quasi-scientific belief that people (essentially babies) are “BORN with a set sexuality”.
I do not find this to be true. If so, then the science should be utilized/showcased time and time again, rather than anecdotal tales of “sexual realization” and using quasi-scientific/pop culture phrases to validate it.
We are ALL born INNOCENT (for the most part) with sexual organs that are designed to operate with each other. Are we allowed to use them whatever we want to/with whomever we choose to? ABSOLUTELY! But until the science is verified concerning the sexuality of babies, we must ALL do our part to disallow these phrases from our spaces (AND minds) until we otherwise see fit.
Joe is so good at keeping him laughing once in a while to ease the tension
Tension is neutral, if the conversation goes there so be it
I noticed that too. Ben is so used to debates and people talking over him or dismissing him that he has adapted this state of tension even in lighthearted conversations.
@@glowrillaz and he is all for it. An argument from joe wont spark anything. Ben will just make points constantly. He debates. This isnt anything new for him to be disagreed with.
There's hardly any tension.. they're just playing tennis with their thoughts
Matt Clark
Even though Joe was arguing, Ben agreed with most of view, conceding that he has no reason to shun gay people/marriage besides religious covenants.
“Little Ben did you bring your homework?”
-“Do you want my political answer or my religious answer?”
straight to the cognitive dissonance and schizophrenia
@ wtf
@@alexroy909 what?
@ where tf did you see cognitive dissonance and skizophrenia
@@alexroy909 "my political answer or my religious answer" hello?
What's on the table,wooden dolls(5:04)?
Joe is great at not pushing too hard when he starts to nail a guest down on a point - he eases up and allows the conversation to flow comfortably. Despite the occasional BS, I am always so impressed by Shapiro's intelligence and sharpness. Nice convo to witness
Someone find this guy a 19 year-old art major with green hair to debate.
It's more in his weight-class.
Stupid comment man, he does that all the time. Haven't you seen sjw owned compilations
@@mulder938 Not sure if you're sarcastic or don't get the comment. Dunking on people only 5 years removed from growing there first pubic hair in a political argument is just as pathetic as if I would go up to a 10 Year Old, dunk on him in a Basketball Match and think I'm some sort of an NBA Superstar.
@@ctesociety9552 lol I suppose it would. Grandad used to say this at the table "children should be seen, not heard"
😄😄😄
Ben Shapiro destroys Ben Shapiro
The real title is in the comments
How
Lights473, idk, but ben is just that good, only he knows how
It’s a joke. Lighten up
Ben Shapiro destroys Shen Bapiro
People really need to watch this, you can have person beliefs and disagreements without that meaning that people should have to conform to your will or restrict others
Wow! Fascinating interview, thank you
Bens the type of guy to say 'pause' in tag when your about to tag him
Underrated comment
Insults aren't arguments
100% the cries to the teacher when you tag him anyway
@@lolli2943 XD
@@epix4300 insults don't care about your opinions
Ben Shapiro: "Facts don't care about feelings."
Also Ben Shapiro: "From a religious point of view......"
Feelings are different from beliefs. Not hating just clarifying
This sounds like it comes from someone who doesn't have any religious beliefs. If you watch a lot of Been Shapiro speeches, he rarely brings up religion, this conversation it seems unavoidable to bring up religion since he is a heavily religious person. Certain topics such as Abortion, I have never seen Ben use the Torah or the Bible in his arguments, unless someone asking him a question at the end of his talks that brings religion up.
He said that he doesn't cite religion for his arguements. If you knew him a little better, you'd know this.
@@theelephantintheroom69 God Doesn't Make Mistakes....
@@theelephantintheroom69 I've watched approximately 10 of his full speech videos which are somewhere from 1.5 to 2 hours long and in any of those videos
, i don't recall him citing Exodus, Deuteronomy, Psalms or any part of the Old Testament that would back up any of his political beliefs.
Like I said in my past comment, when people have tried to use Scripture to justify their political views or they have heard someone else has and they bring that up to him at the end of his speeches is the only times I have heard him speak on religion.
It seems like you know in enough that you should know this, so I don't see your point in the way you replied.
Ben Shapiro always looks through his eyebrows and naturally makes him look like a villain.
fr
Ben handled this way better than Matt Walsh.
Joe Rogan is the kind of guy who can disagree with you on many things but still doesn't make you feel like a horrible person for having differing beliefs. This is the best way to have tough and important conversations.
He is a notoriously chill dude. Weed, tons of excercise, and he is also really into float tanks, which keep you really mellow.
I try to roll like Joe with all these challenging situation’s in the world today. It really works to be mellow when talking to people plus I smoke weed also.❤💨💨💨💨💨💨💨💨👋😊
Joe will let you broadcast yourself as a monster, it's no skin off his nose.
I would argue that you’re giving him too much credit. The reason he can be so chill is because he doesn’t ACTALLY care. It doesn’t affect him. But change the subject to weed and watch him fly off the handle.
Except if you diss MJ
I really respect how Joe can engage with a difficult topic and have some meaningful dialogue out of it. Even though he doesn't agree with a lot of the points raised, he still has a constructive conversation.
Agree 100%.
This is how I have engaged in debate all my life. It's also how I imagined debate should be. Not to win but to learn and grow.
Truth is, I'm gay but I find it fascinating how the religious think AND I find it even more interesting how they rationalize and are still accepting of gay people in the modern world.
I have no hate for their beliefs. On the contrary, I enjoy learning reasonable, everyday people's reasoning for why they hold them.
Most of them don't have any special hate for gays they just don't have a personal experience into that perspective. We all need to appreciate that point.
tookings I feel the same way but from the other perspective lol, honestly the only standpoint on it I have is that sex outside of marriage is a sin, so sure two men or women or whomever having sex is a sin, but so is a man and a woman having sex outside of marriage🤷🏻♂️ I donno I think people forget the fact that everyone sins so if ya wanna criticize someone for theirs become perfect first lol
This should be standard, not something to congratulate you, sad world
They're not disagreeing here? as far as laws go at least. Ben is just saying that according to his morality to stick to his religious beliefs, he cannot condone the act. Doesn't mean he thinks it's to be shunned, made illegal, or the sort.
I have just subscribed because of this.
The only time you'll ever see someone do a smolder face along with Joe in the thumbnail
If it only for reperduction then how does he only have three kids in 15 years of being married, unless they have only had physical intimacy three times
You can't be this silly. No way.
I feel bad for his wife. At that point I couldn’t blame her for cheating. And when they did have sex there probably wasn’t any foreplay and he busted after 2 minutes of missionary. That’s an embarrassing sex life 😂.
How can you choose religion over sex WHEN YOU‘RE IN A RELATIONSHIP??????? It’s fucked up that religion tells teens they’re wrong for masturbating and having sex. As a teen you’re horny 24/7. i‘m so glad that religion is basically non existent in Europe
Joe rogan is an absolutely master of communication
The Atheist hahahahaha okay dude
Ben isn’t
Yeah it's his show. He manipulates it the way he wants. He asks questions in a way that corners shapiro like he's really saying " you really believe in god??? You really believe in miracles???" Because Shapiro's convictions are more towards rules than actually faith he stumbles when answering. I would be like " yup! I believe that moses parted the red sea! I believe in miracles! I believe it all!" And just let it be a discussion of belief and unbelief...which is essentially what it is
Yea he's a greatly talker absolutely English language
@bro momento the incorrect grammar in the original comment is deliberate
I feel like Ben Shapiro is the guy who reminds the teacher we had homework
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Because that's that good Thu tho do XD
@ladywharton I actually just released my first song today so💕
Oh 100%
😂
This conversation should be how all conversations go. Tons of questions. Lots of listening. Respect from both ends. Maybe not a lot of agreeing, but that is free will and inclusion. Everyone should be able to have different opinions and be able to express them without being cancelled. If someone expressing an extreme opinion they should be able to be heard why they think that way. Then they should listen to the counter argument so maybe we could come to mutual understanding and common ground for living in the same society.
I disagree this is a calm conversation. Shapiro is always under some pressure and sounds angry. You can also notice by his mimic and colour of his face.
DhanU: Ben :) Your lecture with Joe was awesome :)
Joe is a great interviewer. He can totally disagree with someone and still have a calm collective conversation. This is how it should be. Just two people sharing ideas learning different point of views from each other. This is why Joe is the number one podcast.
How can you respect someone with views like that...
what would this dude do to gay people/ gay marriage if he was in a position to do something about it?
I think the problem here is that society has had a horrible understanding of a conversation. Now days you cant even say fat, without having 20 people coming at you mad and insulted.
@@chrism8311 Shapiro said so himself, he doesn’t care what other people do. It’s just a rule in respective religions that you can’t be gay if you follow that religion. He explicitly said “I’m not trying to convert anyone”
@@chrism8311 "How can you respect someone with views like that..." And his argument would hold the same weight if he said the same thing about you. "How could i respect someone that promotes sinful behaviour?"... this type of thinking is far more dangerous than what his actual beliefs are. And yeah, i totally disagree with everything he says... at least i was able to hear it without someone shouting bigot and other insults...
Ben Shapiro the kinda guy who says vanilla ice cream is too spicy
Lmao 😂
Or mayo is
@there's no catchy slogan
r/facepalm
It is tho
If you bite it
Fantastic conversation
Why do sexual preferences even get pushed on society. Everyone should keep their sexual preferences behind closed doors.
Valid
Including straight couples. You won’t find PDA in Muslim nations.
Probably because it's harder to find a longer lasting relationship for gay people because many are too afraid of coming out
I like Joe Rogan. He is asking the kinds of questions I would of Ben Shapiro. Tough, but fair and polite.
Still disagree with Ben.
That’s what he is saying. He doesn’t care. But him going to the party of two gay men is supporting a sinful event in his eyes. It’s not that he cares if they bang eachother it’s that he would knowingly be sinning by going to the party.
Yeah, Joe did a great job. It's his job to ask the difficult questions. I think Ben also answered well, though obviously some people in the comments still misunderstood.
X X Yea, I don’t get how people are confused about Ben’s answers.
SHoomerT same. I don’t agree with his beliefs, but I understand what his point is as much as I can being someone who follows no religion.
You must be anti-Semitic. Read or reread "The Diary of Anne Frank" and then you can be brought back into the fold, black sheep.
This is what makes Joe Rogan's show so great. You couldn't have a discussion this free and this long anywhere else on TV.
Agreed!
Imagine, discussing to opposite point of views with the goal to understand one another.
I love “Joe Rogan”
The discussion on TV is already stupid and this is even more brain dead than that
Or this civil
Lol I’ve counted like ten top comments praising joes interviewing skills already. Lol
But you used to see tons of shows like that in the 1970s and 1980s with people of different points of views and being civil.
Foregoing the proper use of your sex drive hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahha says Poindexter 😂
20:46 "What if there was a barbecue the next day, would you consider it?" hahahahaha I'm not necessarily a big fan of Joe Rogan, but he's a funny guy
Joe's curiousity and hunger for knowledge helped him navigate that interview perfectly. bravo.
Jessie Chapman the way he asks Ben and counter arguments him without hard feelings is just amazing to me.
@@LukeNorther it's really not amazing, dialogue like this should be the standard. Instead we get discussions and when people disagree they throw hissy fits
@@blitzvgc2363 Yes, it should be the standard for sure. Too many snowflakes.
He handled himself a lot better than I would have in his situation. I have zero tolerance for bigotry and especially religious bigotry.
Both guys just sharing opinions without getting out of hand, this is how interviews are supposed to be
No one:
Ben Shapiro: >:|
Acraze He’s a goofy ass clean lil church boy.
@@bandit7447 synagogue*
Rustler V6 yeah, goofy ass clean little church boy is better.
underrated ocmment honestly
@@wren4077 u wot m8?
Sin is when your behavior hurts or harms another person, not whether they follow rituals, wear funny clothes or objects, etc.
Two things can be true.
i feel like more christians should have the approach that ben and most other jews have. "do whatever you like, the government shouldn't get involved. but if you want to be a part of *our* religion, there's rules"
As a gay man I agree with that. I don’t want to force other people to conform to my worldview but I also don’t want to be actively harassed or disrespected.
No one :
Absolutely no one :
Ben shapiro: I'm Jewish and my wife is a doctor
Haters going to hate
@@zks82mdu3b im jewish and my wife is a doctor
@@joeyvaldez835 I'm French Black and my wife is a doctor
Wow, this comment is hilarious! You know, it reminds me of a comment that I saw here a week ago. Oh wait, you stole that comment.
@@dueunicycle3699 the irony here
Joe Rogan beautifully asks the tough questions. And Ben answers honestly, he is strong in his faith. I love this debate because it’s two so contrasting views and they have a civil conversation. Great learning
I didn’t see it as a debate but ok
@Renn *Ur Dad **_Lesbian_*
Davey Boucher what Ben Shapiro doesn’t understand is that you shouldn’t impose your religious view on other people regarding making laws
@@EmpireTextbooks He literally says numerous times that he doesn't take his religious beliefs into account when looking at politics.
Eon Gaming he might say that but his political beliefs on things such as gay marriage come from his religious beliefs
I play the Joe parts at 1.25x, and the Ben parts at 0.75x
Notice how the talk on gay is always on man-to-man sex only
Why Ben Shapiro always looking mad asf even when he laughs he looks like he has some crazy shit going through his head. Boy need to chill.
It’s just his eyebrows. You need to chill.
he is reactionary bigoted racist and religious zealot, that is why
Honestly I believe the way people feel and/or think--Their personality I guess--does affect how they look as they grow up. It kinda makes sense because you hold your body language which includes facial expressions by how you feel and what you think and your muscles must grow in to those suspensions as you grow. To me he looks as though he was always told he was correct - which I think he is alot of the time - and had a very sheltered childhood. That's why I think he always looks smug. Not hating here dudes... Just a theory of somebody who's studied biology at a university level but has never done any sort of research on this particular matter... In fact I think my education didn't even touch on any sort of matter like this. :)
He’s a Republican controlled Android. Sent from the past to spew out propaganda under the guise of pseudo intelligence.
@@jacktenrec8929 you got any more buzzwords?
I’m gay. I married a woman to try to fix myself. And guess what? It didn’t work lol.
Olivia Rogers my pastor told me if i married a woman God would reward my faith by fixing me lol
I’m happy now and living as my authentic self. I also feel closer to God now, not trying to be someone I’m not. Being with a woman felt wrong. Like I was doing something i wasn’t supposed to be doing. But now I am happy.
Olivia Rogers thanks. And FYI, just bought the book 🙃
Olivia Rogers i give you my word. I will.
Because you are week
3:58 - Religion fundamentally rejects the idea that you are driven to do something; therefore it is your identity. Therefore, you get to participate in a behavior.
Well said, Ben.
Joe Rogan saw neurocysticercosis on an X-ray ?? 😂😂