Hope everyone enjoys the video! Any and all feedback is thoroughly appreciated, positive or negative. You can find links to my social media accounts in the description, as well as a link to my Spider-Man 2.1 video, in case anyone hasn’t seen that! Thanks a bunch, folks.
in the editor's cut of the pre Peter vs Harry scenes, peter is on the same sofa and ( I believe) on the same position he left Norman's body in, as if to mock Harry. Quite haunting
@@mikeexitsYes, but this was meant to connect to a deleted scene from the first movie where Peter puts Norman down on a bed in his residence. They brought it back for Spider-Man 3 when Harry remembers. Not sure why it was cut but I imagine it was because of time and would mean that Peter had to undress Goblin before swinging across the city holding his corpse. Yeah…
*Spider-Man 3:* Peter shows up to Harry's apartment upset and fights him. After taunting Harry, he throws his grenade back at him and leaves. Later, he dances after getting Eddie fired for slandering him. *Spider-Man 3 (Editor's Cut):* Peter shows up to Harry's apartment, mimicking the pose he left his dead father in, tells Harry that his father never loved him, throws a grenade at him, and then dances in the streets to James Brown after believing he might have killed his best friend both emotionally and literally. How did Raimi make Bully Maguire even more of a menace!?
@@TheAzulmagiaYeah, Peter in Editor's Cut is way more evil while wearing black suit, the fact he wanted to remind Harry his dead father and the way he celebrates after hurting him (the newspaper about Eddie isn't even there in Editor's Cut, it feels like he's happy because he hurt his friend)
When Peter opened the chest in the new scene it looked like it was breathing. Really creepy and definitely going for that horror vibe they where going for originally.
The editors cut comparison for Harry and peters fight is kinda funny. Going from a serious “What did you do to her?” To a laid back Peter complimenting Harry’s performance lol
29:30 I think Harry knew as soon as he found out that his father was the Green Goblin at the end of the second film that Peter did not kill his father, and that even if he did it was in self-defense. Arguably, he probably even started to believe that Spider-Man couldn't have killed his father when he discovered that Spidey was his friend Peter. I think that his struggle was actually his shock at discovering that his father was a supervillain, and he couldn't accept that fact. So he took it out on Peter as a way to cope. At the end of the movie, he realizes that all he's done is make things even worse and that not only has he lost his father but he's lost his friend as well. He didn't need closure on his father. He already had it. That wasn't the point of his arc. His arc was reconciling with Peter.
The butler did mention how harry was trying to protect his fathers honor. Also think about how Harry found out Peter was Spiderman. Now lets go back to “Spiderman 1” Where Harry got cucked by Spiderman… All this time he was getting cucked by his best friend. That’s another reason for his dislike with Peters lying in my opinion.
Here's a list of SM3 deleted scenes that were discovered throughout the years. #ReleaseTheRaimiCut -Peter sees a woman rescue her son from rope-swinging like Spidey on a tree -John Jameson accidentally makes the alien Symbiote crash land into Earth -Extended Peter vs New Goblin -Extended Flint Marko police chase and alternate Sandman transformation -Extended Sandman awakening -Extended scene of Spidey saving Gwen -Peter goes to Oscorp and asks receptionist if Harry's around -Before Key to City ceremony begins, a boy tells his mom he saw Spidey after Peter shoots web line on his shoe -Extended Key to City ceremony -Spidey saves baby from Sandman's sandstorm and investigates the disturbance by examining the truck Sandman used to attack cops (RUclipsr Daily Bugle Spidey makes cameo) -Extended Spidey vs Sandman armored car fight -Sandman visits Dr Phil Wallace (played by Adrian Lester) to help find a cure for his physically sick daughter -Extended Black Suit Spider-Man transformation -When Peter wakes up wearing the Black Suit upside down against a skyscraper window, he hallucinates himself in the reflection wearing his regular Spidey suit -Extended scene of Eddie taking pictures of Black Suit Spidey (with some slightly altered dialogue) -Extended Black Suit Spidey vs Sandman Subway train fight (with an alternate scene of Sandman being washed away into the sewers) -Peter hallucinates a monstrous figure (Venom) while looking at himself in his apartment mirror, and tries to get the suit off. -Alternate scene of Harry recovering from his amnesia and hearing his father's voice -Peter cautiously stares at the box where he locked the Black Suit, feeling uneasy, followed by an alternate scene of Peter apologizing to Ursula for being so aggressive in front of her and her dad while under the influence of the Symbiote. -Extended MJ breaks up with Peter scene -Extended scene of Peter ultimately deciding to wear the Black Suit again -After Eddie is fired, Hoffman uses the "chimes of serenity" on Jameson after he unintentionally makes him mad; only to break the chimes' effects by telling him the DB may be at risk of losing money from Eddie's fraudulent photos -Black Suit Spidey swings away from the Daily Bugle and goes on a violent vigilante spree, where he smashes a thug's head on a car windshield and pins down 2 thugs under their own motorcycles; It is after these set of events that Peter feels regret over his cruelty, and swings back home to lock the suit back in his box -Eddie visits Gwen to go on a date, only to be rejected after Gwen finds out he was fired from DB for framing Spidey -Extended Symbiote Peter vs Harry fight (with an alternate introduction) -Extended jazz club scene (with MJ's dialogue being slightly altered) -Extended church scene and alternate Venom transformation -Sandman turns into a sandcastle for his daughter, followed by an alternate scene of Venom asking for Sandman's help, threatening to kill his family if he doesn't comply -MJ visits Harry at his home and talks to Harry about forgiveness (replacing the scene where she sees Peter on the street outside her window), followed by the scene where she's kidnapped by Venom in the taxi -Alternate scene of Peter asking Harry to help him save MJ (but instead of wearing his costume, he's only wearing his civilian clothing), followed by a scene of Harry tearing up over a broken picture of him, Peter, and MJ -Dr. Wallace visits the Marko's to talk about Flint's whereabouts Gwen and her father head to the construction site after seeing Venom's real face in a news report. -Extended Spidey and New Goblin vs Venom and Sandman at construction site fight -Sandman's family and Dr Wallace stop Sandman from killing Peter -Alternate Eddie Brock death scene (the Symbiote feeds on Eddie's body after the process of being permanently bonded is complete and absorbs his soul to become one single entity. The Symbiote tries to bond with Peter again, only for him to yank down metal pipes that cause intense vibrations that kill Eddie and the Symbiote for good) -Alternate scene of Peter and MJ mourning Harry's death -Extended funeral scene -One final swing scene
Does anyone know the story about Sam Raimi's original plan for the climax? I read somewhere that after he was forced to add Venom and Eddie to the plot, he wanted Gwen to be the damsel-in-distress instead of MJ. Sam promised Kirsten Dunst that she wouldn't be the damsel for the third time straight, but, of course, Sony forced him to make MJ the helpless hostage again. Gwen being the hostage in the climax makes more sense in the long run. Looking at the few scenes of her and Eddie together, there's a sense of Eddie making up an imaginary relationship between them. The first thing he does after Spidey saves Gwen during the crane scene is ask him for a photo; his immediate concern for Gwen is almost like an afterthought. When Gwen later tells him they only "had a coffee," Eddie's facial expression darkens like someone hearing something they didn't want to hear, especially if they're a narcissist. It gives the hint that Eddie concocted his relationship with Gwen; he may have done it for status since she's the police captain's daughter. P.S. That scene seems cut short since it ends with Eddie's reaction and cuts to Mary Jane and Harry, so more Gwen and Eddie dialogue might've been there to flesh out their non-existent relationship. Then Gwen kisses Spider-Man in front of a crowd of people like it's nobody's business despite being in a "relationship"; someone with a huge ego like Eddie would have issues with that. There's even a deleted scene of Gwen dumping Eddie when he goes to her house after he gets fired. Venom kidnapping Mary Jane just because she's Peter's girlfriend is too contrived; him taking Gwen instead would be the more personal, egocentric move for Eddie. Gwen is Peter's classmate and Eddie's "girlfriend-in-title-only" before she breaks up with him and starts seeing Peter. Eddie has more reasons to go after Gwen than to take the easy route with Mary Jane. Then Peter would feel guilty for a classmate getting dragged into his Spider-Man business.
Looking at the set photos, it looks like Gwen would’ve been present at the final battle in some way but I’m highly doubtful they ever shot her being kidnapped. You’re absolutely correct tho, it would make complete sense for her to be the one in danger. There’s a clip in the trailer of MJ in her waitress outfit talking to Harry about forgiveness, which was presumably intended to be during or right before the final battle. It’s interesting looking at the relationship between Eddie and Gwen. Like you say, he’s a complete narcissist who convinces himself they’re in a long term relationship after one date. I believe the novelisation expands upon this even more. I’d love to see more footage of Gwen, because as it is in the final film, she really has no business being there at all
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS Sam did shoot some scenes of her in Peril but they never finished it when they decided to change it to be Mary Jane and the original scene involves her looking at the news and seeing that Venom was Eddie and showing up at the final battle to see what happens so that's all they shot again like I said they shot some scenes for her in distress but they never finished everything so it wouldn't make sense to make a ultracut with her in it since there's not much footage of her and distress but everything else that she shot at the battle site was intended for her to be witnessing what happens to Eddie and Spider-Man
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS also the entire Venom versus Spider-Man fight was a lot longer and more graphic is Sam Raimi Spider-Man 3 remix Extended Cut Sony yes please and thanks
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS 8:28 I urge you to look at that scene again as they are in each other's arms dancing and they are dancing and they're happy of each other they are forgiving of each other they are loving of each other in this moment and it's absolutely beautiful and sweeping and the music perfectly surmises the sweeping and epic nature of them finally back together and so like I said I urge you to see and watch that scene again and see experience and feel the emotional brevity and epicness of the scene of Peter and Mary Jane
Gwen being the hostage doesn't make any sense for the story because Eddie's motivations don't matter, it's about Peter and harry. Ultimately MJ was the one they both loved so it's the only thing that could bring them together, but raises the emotional stakes to a personal level. Plus it works for Eddie too, it makes him more sadistic to go after a girl Peter loved that meant nothing to him. The only reason to make Gwen the hostage is to validate the one scene from earlier and I don't buy that.
One thing I think you might have forgotten regarding the Editor's Cut: even though Bernard doesn't outright spell out that Norman died by his own hand, Peter *did* tell Harry earlier in the film that Norman killed himself trying to kill him. At the time, Harry might not have believed him, but he most likely chose to believe those words in the final act when he goes to help Peter.
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS Just wondering why there was never a expended edition of Spiderman 1 , or a director's cut ? I would like to see that , if there is any footage they had filmed that was still around , and could be used maybe? as SPiderman 2 got like extended editions and so did spiderman 3
Nah, it just reinforces how infantilized the theatrical cut made the characters, constantly needing outside forces to push them into doing the right thing.
Them removing the Aunt May scene at the end ruined the flow of the third act. It felt like they rushed to the ending. The Sand Castle scene was supposed to happen after Peter got rid of the symbiote and was supposed to be the way Sandman meets Venom. They cut that part from the Editor's Cut for obvious reasons.
Exactly. Like the editor had no clue what made the movie work or why things were done, he just tried to fit it under the existing runtime for whatever reason and lopped an important scene. Even the butler scene, which I don't really miss and kind of like Harry going to help Peter without ever really knowing if he killed Norman or not, was put in by Raimi for a reason that made sense to him. He's doing a riff on Frank Capra movies where an unimportant side character holds the key to unlocking what the more central one knows deep inside. I trust the director more than a random editor.
@@brentandrew2419 That Editor has been collaborating with Raimi since Darkman, he even edited the new Doctor Strange movie for Raimi. If anybody knows Raimi, it's him.
@@ericdxfan511 Except he went against Raimi's (final) cut of the movie. I don't buy that Raimi told him to take the Aunt May scene out, I really don't. Raimi had a falling out with Elfman too at one time.
@@brentandrew2419 I don’t think it was a case of Raimi telling him to take the scene out, more that the scene wasn’t in there to begin with and was part of the reshoots, with the editor’s cut going back to a version of the film that existed before the reshoots…
If Sony were to do another new cut of Spider-Man 3, let this be the extended cut or a newer version of the movie. 1. Bring back all the deleted scenes that were in the editors cut 2. Use a mix of both Christopher Young and Danny Elfmans score that is best suited to the scene 3. Restore some of the missing scenes abandoned in the editors cut from the theatrical cut 4. Keep the arranged scenes from the editors cut as they flowed a bit better in terms of pacing compared to the theatrical cut 5. Even more scenes that didn’t make it to the final cut like the character Dr. Wallace talking to Sandman 6. More Venom Then, you got yourself the definitive version of Spider-Man 3 that Sam Raimi originally intended to show.
With this video, here's how I'm gonna rewatch Spider-Man 3: -Editor's cut as a base -restore Norman's lines -restore the Aunt may scene -use the theatrical ending score Hopefully we uncover more deleted scenes so we can get a proper extended/director's cut (even if it has to be fanmade)
I would also add the scene with Mr. Ditkovich here, but it would be after Peter gets rid of the black suit and after the dialogue between Peter and Aunt May.
@@The_Maxym Not Insulation, Isolation. That is Peter becoming alone due to the symbiote's influences causing him to push others away (it was mentioned in the video)
@@kieranprior3873 Sorry, my fault. And thanks for the explanation. By the way, I forgot to say that you can restore the scene where Bernard tells Harry the truth about his father's death. But this will happen before Mary Jane is captured and Peter comes to Harry for help.
What i love most about the editors cut is the rearrangement of Peter outting Eddie and his fight with Harry in the theatrical version he beats up Harry then outs Eddie and it feels like he went bad too fast then goes to petty office drama. With the editors cut it feels like a steady downwards progression from outting Eddie and almost killing Harry then ultimately hitting MJ which makes him see the errors of his way. Idk it just feels like a better progression into darkness for Pete to me
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS the Interscope is the better scene because there is still that animosity between them but it's a lot more playful with their anger instead of straight up tiers angry and Harry is just being better it's a lot better but I don't hate the theatrical cut either I love both scenes the editors cut is just getting to the point quicker and it's just better looking and it just the better scene
With No Way Home really bringing attention back to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man universe, and really hope we will get the footage from Spider-Man 3 that seems to have been lost to time. Also, it seems Raimi himself is very willing to return for Spider-Man 4 now with Tobey, as well as several of the other actors who were part of the original trilogy (Kirsten Dunst and Thomas Haden Church); so you've got most of the main players willing to do it, it's now just up to the studio. It would be very cool of Sony, if they actually decide to move forward with Spider-Man 4 with Tobey Maguire, to release a revised version of the third film OR - if that's too expensive - just dump all of the footage on a re-release of the film in maybe a deleted/alternate/extended scene format. It's always drove me crazy that many of the scenes in the trailers for Spider-Man 3 back in 2006 and 2007, were never featured in the actual film. The hype for the third film was unparalleled back in the day, and I spent countless hours on different forums and pre-RUclips video sharing sites rewatching the trailers countless times. To see some of what I was so hyped for not come to fruition in the final cut of the film was disappointing, and I hope I'll get to see it one day. But, even if not, a new Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire Spider-Man film in the 2020s would be pretty damn awesome!
I want to see the uncut final battle with Peter pulling out Eddie but all he's able to pull out is his skeleton (with a "venomized" skull) because Venom had already absorbed him and was just using his skeleton as a framework to move around. It's theorized because of that, that any prior scenes of "Eddie" Venom talking/fighting with Spiderman was actually just Venom using Eddie's body as a puppet and that Eddie had already been gone mentally until he assimilated him. Apparently that was cut because testing audiences found it too disturbing.
In the editors cut of when Peter and Harry are about to fight, i think a nice little detail I noticed is that when Harry asks "what took you so long?" and it pans over to Peter on that sofa, it looks like the exact sofa that Spider-man layed Normal down on at the end of the first movie.
One pattern I noticed is that the reshoots in the theatrical cut tend to have brighter lighting, like the Ursula scene and the Peter vs. Harry pre-fight talk. Also, Maguire and Franco seem less bulky in the theatrical version. I wonder if it was intentional or if the lighting crew had to make new setups without any available reference to how it was before.
Seems a lot of the reshoots were shoddily done in general. The best example is them seemingly losing the steel blade prop from the final fight, if you look close at the part where Peter breaks out of Venom’s web restraints and grabs the steel blade he was smacked with before, you will notice that after he swings it, it cuts to him slapping venom in the face with a bent metal pipe instead. This was originally meant to follow into venom being sliced through his side (?) and becoming what I can only describe as a monster straight from The Thing, or Sam Raimi’s visual representation of like revenge or rage or whatever lol.
I am watching the editors edition right now and I really do enjoy the way everything flows together and how dark it is. I decided to watch it after watching this video. With it being not as long, I thought it was going to be a lesser version of the movie. Thank you so much for this video.
The point of the editors cut version was also about Harry giving up vengeance to retain his friendship. Also to finally get out of the shadows of his father.
I very much appreciated both of your videos on the differences between the different cuts of these films. I’ve never been huge fan of the third film, but I really appreciated how in depth you went into the story beats of both versions. I might have to try the editor’s cut and see if that changes my experience.
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I just finished my rewatch of the whole trilogy: Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2.1, both of which I’ve always loved, and then Spider-Man 3: Editor’s Cut, for the first time. I’ve seen the theatrical cut of 3 many times and liked it less and less each rewatch. I was utterly shocked at how much I enjoyed watching the E.C. It’s amazing how much of a difference it makes when the proper music, structure, and storytelling is there. I felt like I was finally watching the proper part 3 to Sam Raimi’s previous two films. It’s definitely still the weakest of the three, as there are many flaws still present, but somehow this version took a movie I otherwise didn’t like, into a movie I actually enjoyed. I don’t think I’ll ever watch the theatrical cut again, it’s the Editor’s Cut for me. I thank you once again for your amazing commentary and analysis that contributed greatly to my newfound appreciation for this version of the film!
@@leiaarianabonny4999 Brilliant! Really happy to hear you've a newfound appreciation for the film now, thanks again for the kind words about the video!
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS you should take a look at a scene you forgot to talk about at the Harry in the hospital scene in the editors cut the music along with the tone of the scene makes it seem like Harry is lying about having amnesia that's why it's very suspenseful going into the scene in the cut!!
there needs to be a Director's cut of the film ... as then Sam Raimi would have been able to maybe add more scenes or reshoot scenes , still I guess it is ok that we got a editor's cut
One of the biggest strengths of the Raimi trilogy was the awesome cast of memorable side characters. Sacrificing them for agency hurts the picture in my opinion
I’d really love to see Young’s score released someday, it’s one of the last well thought out superhero scores in the last few years, in my opinion. It was great to hear some old material in NWH, but it never felt genuine, as if a higher up told Giacchino he could only use themes in specific places. (Elfman’s Peter Parker theme was used too much, would’ve preferred more uses of the Spidey theme) I’m fine with the leaked sessions here on RUclips, but I feel like there’s something more special about owning a physical copy of a score, especially this one.
Thank you SO MUCH for pointing out the weird black bars closing in on the new scenes. It is also briefly noticeable in Spider-Man 2.1 and The Amazing Spider-Man.
No worries! It’s very strange isn’t it? I’m not really sure how it even happened, especially because you’d think it’d be relatively easy to fix. Can’t say I noticed in 2.1 tho…
20:50 I much prefer the theatrical version of this scene. Ursula being excited for Peter that MJ called back even though she has a crush on him is such a sweet character moment for her. She just wants Pete to be happy. The editors cut is just a boring dialogue exchange.
I agree that's probably the only part I wish stayed the same as the original. Well maybe that and Aunt May talking to Pete after he tries to give back the ring
6:39 This proves that music can make a world of difference.. It's amazing and beautiful. The editors cut was better in my opinion because it added more depth as you watched and listened.
One of the changes I’m very conflicted with has to be the interaction between Harry and Peter before they fight. I think the one in the Editor’s Cut is really good because of the callback to Norman’s body on the sofa with Peter laying in that exact spot and the very casual nature of how the two talk before brawling. That said, one thing that has always bugged me is the segue into Harry’s line about how MJ used to kiss him. Something about it never jived with me, especially with Peter suddenly being visibly pissed. The theatrical cut, I also like because of how Harry actually calls out Peter on his lack of care for MJ while also rubbing the rekindling of his own relationship with her in his face. There’s also a neat juxtaposition of Peter’s “What did you do to her” because it can be interpreted as him either acting selfishly or selflessly since Harry did force Peter and MJ’s breakup but Peter already treated MJ poorly. But this version of the scene only works in the context of the theatrical cut since the order of scenes makes the fight the start of Peter’s downfall where he’s still got some good left in him while the editor’s cut places it later in it so it makes sense he’s less serious and more jokey, especially when the dance sequence comes after the fight.
19:00 Actually, you can remove the scene entirely. Just imply that Harry had been faking his amnesia the entire time so he could manipulate Peter and MJ.
I don't love SM3, but I've come around on it quite a bit. It's like this old joke: "I used to think you were a screw up, but so many screw ups have come along since that you've advanced in line without doing anything." That describes my feelings toward the film. It isn't great, but it's placement has risen because of what's come after, especially just in the last couple of years. It is frustrating movie, but it understands storytelling (a rarity now) and I can sense it trying very hard to make everyone happy, it just serves too many masters. I also think it gets more right than it gets credit for. Anyway, I think the newer cut is slighter better and I'll take it.
One thing I noticed about the Editor's Cut in the second act was that Peter's clothes had the proper continuity. In the theatrical cut, he wears a light blue collar when meeting MJ at the bridge. However, when he sees Harry, he's wearing a jacket with a navy blue shirt, which leads to the scene where he's silent in his room, but he's wearing the collar again. It goes back and forth in the theatrical cut but the Editor's cut has a clearer order
As clunky as the theatrical version is for Harry's turn, it's still the better version. Looking at a picture shouldn't be enough of a change for Harry. I don't think that's any sort of real emotional catalyst at all. Bernard telling Harry what I believe Harry knew all along finally breaks his denial, and his drive to uphold his idealistic image of his father. It also rhymes with Pete's version of this with Aunt May - an older parental figure's love being able to break Harry/Peter out of their emotionally-blind loneliness. For all this talk of agency, all the Editor's Cut did was make the world feel small and lonely. It feels colder, but that goes against the very themes of the movie. People were always there to help and love both Peter and Harry - they were just too blind to see or too proud to ask. The Editor's Cut makes it feel as if they truly didn't have help.
I swear there were soooo many different versions. I remember when I was young and watch it at the cinemas compared to DVD, was sooo different! Then watching it again as an adult it's still sooo different!
Release 'Spider-Man 3.1' (Extended Cut) This petition is about the 2007 blockbuster film, 'Spider-Man 3'. Although the film was a success, as time went on, many unused scenes and deleted footage have resurfaced on the Internet over the past 12 years. Leading many to speculate what could exist and what could be added into the original cut. Numerous sources online confirm the existence of many unused scenes that never made the original cut or editor's cut. Many unused scenes that we the fans would love to see used in an extended version of the film. (3.1) in 2007, Sony Pictures Entertainment released 'Spider-Man 2.1' an extension of the original film in an effort to reinstate unused scenes and drive hype towards the upcoming 'Spider-Man 3'. In 2017, Sony Pictures Entertainment released the Blu-Ray box set of all 5 of the previous 'Spider-Man' films with an added 'Spider-Man 3 Editor's Cut' in order to drive up interest for the upcoming film 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'. The Editors Cut was created to add back the original score from Christopher Young that was unused from the original version of 'Spider-Man 3' as well as a plot restructuring with different scenes that were shot, so as to make the Editor's Cut an alternate version of the original film. However, there are still many unused scenes that are yet to be reinstated in a version of the film. We the fans are eternally grateful that Sony continues to support the 'Spider-Man' franchise and community. The 'Spider-Man' franchise has generated millions of dollars in revenue and has created hours upon hours of happy content and entertainment. Even though the Sam Raimi Spider-Man Series has concluded, we as fans of the original trilogy are still as passionate about our favorite webhead than ever. We the fans would love to see the many unused/deleted scenes reinstated in an extended cut of 'Spider-Man 3'. (3.1). So as we can have closure to the deleted scenes that have floated around since 2007. Please consider our request. Thank you.
Yeahhhh I definitely had that at first, but as time’s gone on I think it’s really nice to have something different for this point in their relationship, which is also why I prefer the Theatrical music at the end, I quite like having that theme return for a happy (ish) ending
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I can’t say the new themes were bad. I saw the editors cut included with my Digibook Trilogy and I was looking for videos to gauge if it was worth watching. Yours was the first I saw and I’m sold. Thanks for the excellent work
Haven’t seen the editor’s cut, but I must say the decision to remove other characters’ impact on the leads’ ultimate decisions is baffling. For a movie in which every villain (including Spidey) becomes worse by venturing further into isolation, the redemption being triggered by others reaching out is one of the only truly emotional catharses of this film. Even more baffling is to do that WHILE LEANING FURTHER INTO the addiction metaphor. If you want to make a statement about addiction, removing a “recovery through human connection” theme seems like the last thing you would want to do.
No lie after being very curious about the Editors Cut for Spider Man 3 I recently saw a video on Facebook of today showing Theatrical Cut and Editor Cut was being compared to side by side,The editor cut was so dark that I had to literally replay the Facebook video and to see Eddie Brock being nothing but a walking skeleton and a corpse from the symbiote eating his entire life away definitely scared me. Seeing that ending made me shocked as Peter Parker seeing Eddie entire face and body was nothing left but a skeleton definitely gave me chills and spooked me out. So….I had to look into deeper and do my research which I came across this video. Thank you so for explaining and showing some things from both versions and different comparisons because some scenes in the editors cut I wish they kept it but I can see why they didn’t. Another thing I would like to mention is the structure scene in the editor cut got me lowkey laughing because who in the right mind will kill their best friend and then after that feeling good about it and dancing like nothing ever happened? 😂 it’s DARK but I’m glad they reorganized the structure scenes because if SPM3 would’ve came out in this generation especially with the editor cut….It would’ve been cancelled.
I get why the Ursula scene was changed for the editors cut but the other version of it feels so stilted and unnatural. I mean I guess it makes sense because they’re awkward with eachother because of him blowing up at them
I came here right after the Spider-Man 2 video. Also this video is valuable content and was worth watching for me. Thanks for making it. I like Spider-Man 3 but I never saw the editors cut, because it's relatively new and not available on german sites. So I will probably need to buy it on an US site. First of all the alternate score soundtrack is a nice addition to the 4k bluray version. Good to know! It seems like the Editors Cut is a great version of the movie, but hold down due to some removals for more independent character choices. This seems like an odd change at some points and I agree with you, that some of the removed scenes were important. The editor had the one time chance to give us some more deleted scenes. He kinda had the power and responsibility, but didn't used it. Or wasn't allowed to used it. Sad. Spider-Man 3 is in such a broken condition. Too many story lines at once because of Sony. And now we have two different cuts, but the second one seems like rushed. Because of Sony. :(
I stumbled upon your vid on a reddit post, didn't expect to finish the whole video. Great content! thank you and keep it up. Would love to see more of similar style of comparison analysis content. Subscribed.
i wish we could get an extended version with all removed content from eddie visiting gwen's house, dr wallace scenes.. that would be dope. And the alternate final where eddie is only bones
I did not like it when they removed the aunt may scene either since i feel like it still would work and its a key scene even for the editor's cut. I totally agree with keeping some of the theatrical soundtrack since that matched way better that new ones. But those new scenes were absolutely fantastic additions to the movie. I actually made an edit of the movie myself where it has some of the removed scenes and new elements of the editor's cut. And yh I've noticed the black side bars on the new scenes while editing 😂. I wish they would have taken more time and even get Raimi to improve it more, but either way its great to have another version that adds to the story significantly. Great video!!
Here is my arrangement of the scenes in the Editor's Cut (I returned 3 scenes that were in the Theatrical Cut but were deleted in the Editor's Cut): After the dance scene, Peter and Gwen go to a jazz club. After the shower scene, the dialogue between Peter and Aunt May begins. Then there is the scene where the butler tells Harry the truth about his father's death. Next, the Sandman gets out of the sewers and the scene with the castle. And the last scene is where Peter apologizes to Mr. Ditkovich. Well, then everything is as it was in the Editor's Cut.
Oh yeah, I hate that cover 🤣 They seem to do that a lot though funnily enough. Another one is putting the symbiote logo on the red & blue suit for boxsets and stuff, it’s annoying
Excellent discussion. 10:10 Another very cool somewhat hidden feature for Spider-Man 3 is the PSP disc being the only official release for the open matte version of the movie. The best version of the movie, to me, and it sucks it's not more known and available. I prefer more image over 4K anyday. It's maybe possible to use a computer to find the open matte in other releases disc files.
Really great video, i remember watching your video about the editor's cut of spiderman 2, im glad you made a sequel, also an editor's cut of spiderman 1 exists?
Dude the biggest crime of the raimi trilogy is not having the score for 3 released, 1 and 3s score made me cry, especially 3, sandmans theme and Harry's deaths theme is so sad man
I'm kind of disappointed that they still left out the symbiote jumpscare, when Peter is looking in the mirror. That was the scene that was only used for the teaser trailer.
Editor's Cut should have restored the scene where Peter hallucinates Venom in a mirror while wearing the black suit. The final film just hard cuts to him removing the suit looking kind of nervous/scared, but that reaction makes no sense without that context.
I don’t think Harry needed to find out how his father died… because he essentially knew and was in denial due to his daddy issues It’s not as if Peter didn’t try to tell him this in the movie already. But it just makes Harry angrier and go “shut upppppp!”
Hope everyone enjoys the video! Any and all feedback is thoroughly appreciated, positive or negative.
You can find links to my social media accounts in the description, as well as a link to my Spider-Man 2.1 video, in case anyone hasn’t seen that!
Thanks a bunch, folks.
Can you review the deleted scenes please?😅
in the editor's cut of the pre Peter vs Harry scenes, peter is on the same sofa and ( I believe) on the same position he left Norman's body in, as if to mock Harry. Quite haunting
Wasn't it also the same place Doc Ock left Peter after capturing him in 2?
@@mikeexitsYes, but this was meant to connect to a deleted scene from the first movie where Peter puts Norman down on a bed in his residence. They brought it back for Spider-Man 3 when Harry remembers. Not sure why it was cut but I imagine it was because of time and would mean that Peter had to undress Goblin before swinging across the city holding his corpse. Yeah…
*Spider-Man 3:* Peter shows up to Harry's apartment upset and fights him. After taunting Harry, he throws his grenade back at him and leaves. Later, he dances after getting Eddie fired for slandering him.
*Spider-Man 3 (Editor's Cut):* Peter shows up to Harry's apartment, mimicking the pose he left his dead father in, tells Harry that his father never loved him, throws a grenade at him, and then dances in the streets to James Brown after believing he might have killed his best friend both emotionally and literally.
How did Raimi make Bully Maguire even more of a menace!?
@@TheAzulmagiaYeah, Peter in Editor's Cut is way more evil while wearing black suit, the fact he wanted to remind Harry his dead father and the way he celebrates after hurting him (the newspaper about Eddie isn't even there in Editor's Cut, it feels like he's happy because he hurt his friend)
The editor's cut is the better version. I also hope one day Sony will release an extended cut of SM3/SM1 with all the useful deleted scenes in it.
We can but dream my friend!
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS now reality
@@SB992REBORN wait it is?
@@SB992REBORN is it?
How is it better tho? Not arguing just wondering as I've never seen it
When Peter opened the chest in the new scene it looked like it was breathing. Really creepy and definitely going for that horror vibe they where going for originally.
I still adore that to this day. It makes the black suit look more like it's alive and is a creature rather than a normal fabric suit.
The editors cut comparison for Harry and peters fight is kinda funny. Going from a serious “What did you do to her?” To a laid back Peter complimenting Harry’s performance lol
29:30 I think Harry knew as soon as he found out that his father was the Green Goblin at the end of the second film that Peter did not kill his father, and that even if he did it was in self-defense. Arguably, he probably even started to believe that Spider-Man couldn't have killed his father when he discovered that Spidey was his friend Peter. I think that his struggle was actually his shock at discovering that his father was a supervillain, and he couldn't accept that fact. So he took it out on Peter as a way to cope. At the end of the movie, he realizes that all he's done is make things even worse and that not only has he lost his father but he's lost his friend as well. He didn't need closure on his father. He already had it. That wasn't the point of his arc. His arc was reconciling with Peter.
The butler did mention how harry was trying to protect his fathers honor. Also think about how Harry found out Peter was Spiderman. Now lets go back to “Spiderman 1” Where Harry got cucked by Spiderman… All this time he was getting cucked by his best friend. That’s another reason for his dislike with Peters lying in my opinion.
Here's a list of SM3 deleted scenes that were discovered throughout the years. #ReleaseTheRaimiCut
-Peter sees a woman rescue her son from rope-swinging like Spidey on a tree
-John Jameson accidentally makes the alien Symbiote crash land into Earth
-Extended Peter vs New Goblin
-Extended Flint Marko police chase and alternate Sandman transformation
-Extended Sandman awakening
-Extended scene of Spidey saving Gwen
-Peter goes to Oscorp and asks receptionist if Harry's around
-Before Key to City ceremony begins, a boy tells his mom he saw Spidey after Peter shoots web line on his shoe
-Extended Key to City ceremony
-Spidey saves baby from Sandman's sandstorm and investigates the disturbance by examining the truck Sandman used to attack cops (RUclipsr Daily Bugle Spidey makes cameo)
-Extended Spidey vs Sandman armored car fight
-Sandman visits Dr Phil Wallace (played by Adrian Lester) to help find a cure for his physically sick daughter
-Extended Black Suit Spider-Man transformation
-When Peter wakes up wearing the Black Suit upside down against a skyscraper window, he hallucinates himself in the reflection wearing his regular Spidey suit
-Extended scene of Eddie taking pictures of Black Suit Spidey (with some slightly altered dialogue)
-Extended Black Suit Spidey vs Sandman Subway train fight (with an alternate scene of Sandman being washed away into the sewers)
-Peter hallucinates a monstrous figure (Venom) while looking at himself in his apartment mirror, and tries to get the suit off.
-Alternate scene of Harry recovering from his amnesia and hearing his father's voice
-Peter cautiously stares at the box where he locked the Black Suit, feeling uneasy, followed by an alternate scene of Peter apologizing to Ursula for being so aggressive in front of her and her dad while under the influence of the Symbiote.
-Extended MJ breaks up with Peter scene
-Extended scene of Peter ultimately deciding to wear the Black Suit again
-After Eddie is fired, Hoffman uses the "chimes of serenity" on Jameson after he unintentionally makes him mad; only to break the chimes' effects by telling him the DB may be at risk of losing money from Eddie's fraudulent photos
-Black Suit Spidey swings away from the Daily Bugle and goes on a violent vigilante spree, where he smashes a thug's head on a car windshield and pins down 2 thugs under their own motorcycles; It is after these set of events that Peter feels regret over his cruelty, and swings back home to lock the suit back in his box
-Eddie visits Gwen to go on a date, only to be rejected after Gwen finds out he was fired from DB for framing Spidey
-Extended Symbiote Peter vs Harry fight (with an alternate introduction)
-Extended jazz club scene (with MJ's dialogue being slightly altered)
-Extended church scene and alternate Venom transformation
-Sandman turns into a sandcastle for his daughter, followed by an alternate scene of Venom asking for Sandman's help, threatening to kill his family if he doesn't comply
-MJ visits Harry at his home and talks to Harry about forgiveness (replacing the scene where she sees Peter on the street outside her window), followed by the scene where she's kidnapped by Venom in the taxi
-Alternate scene of Peter asking Harry to help him save MJ (but instead of wearing his costume, he's only wearing his civilian clothing), followed by a scene of Harry tearing up over a broken picture of him, Peter, and MJ
-Dr. Wallace visits the Marko's to talk about Flint's whereabouts
Gwen and her father head to the construction site after seeing Venom's real face in a news report.
-Extended Spidey and New Goblin vs Venom and Sandman at construction site fight
-Sandman's family and Dr Wallace stop Sandman from killing Peter
-Alternate Eddie Brock death scene (the Symbiote feeds on Eddie's body after the process of being permanently bonded is complete and absorbs his soul to become one single entity. The Symbiote tries to bond with Peter again, only for him to yank down metal pipes that cause intense vibrations that kill Eddie and the Symbiote for good)
-Alternate scene of Peter and MJ mourning Harry's death
-Extended funeral scene
-One final swing scene
Oh wow
One final swing scene :0
One final swing?!?!?
HOLY YIKES!
John Jameson what!!!!
Does anyone know the story about Sam Raimi's original plan for the climax? I read somewhere that after he was forced to add Venom and Eddie to the plot, he wanted Gwen to be the damsel-in-distress instead of MJ. Sam promised Kirsten Dunst that she wouldn't be the damsel for the third time straight, but, of course, Sony forced him to make MJ the helpless hostage again.
Gwen being the hostage in the climax makes more sense in the long run. Looking at the few scenes of her and Eddie together, there's a sense of Eddie making up an imaginary relationship between them. The first thing he does after Spidey saves Gwen during the crane scene is ask him for a photo; his immediate concern for Gwen is almost like an afterthought. When Gwen later tells him they only "had a coffee," Eddie's facial expression darkens like someone hearing something they didn't want to hear, especially if they're a narcissist. It gives the hint that Eddie concocted his relationship with Gwen; he may have done it for status since she's the police captain's daughter. P.S. That scene seems cut short since it ends with Eddie's reaction and cuts to Mary Jane and Harry, so more Gwen and Eddie dialogue might've been there to flesh out their non-existent relationship. Then Gwen kisses Spider-Man in front of a crowd of people like it's nobody's business despite being in a "relationship"; someone with a huge ego like Eddie would have issues with that. There's even a deleted scene of Gwen dumping Eddie when he goes to her house after he gets fired.
Venom kidnapping Mary Jane just because she's Peter's girlfriend is too contrived; him taking Gwen instead would be the more personal, egocentric move for Eddie. Gwen is Peter's classmate and Eddie's "girlfriend-in-title-only" before she breaks up with him and starts seeing Peter. Eddie has more reasons to go after Gwen than to take the easy route with Mary Jane. Then Peter would feel guilty for a classmate getting dragged into his Spider-Man business.
Looking at the set photos, it looks like Gwen would’ve been present at the final battle in some way but I’m highly doubtful they ever shot her being kidnapped. You’re absolutely correct tho, it would make complete sense for her to be the one in danger. There’s a clip in the trailer of MJ in her waitress outfit talking to Harry about forgiveness, which was presumably intended to be during or right before the final battle.
It’s interesting looking at the relationship between Eddie and Gwen. Like you say, he’s a complete narcissist who convinces himself they’re in a long term relationship after one date. I believe the novelisation expands upon this even more. I’d love to see more footage of Gwen, because as it is in the final film, she really has no business being there at all
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS Sam did shoot some scenes of her in Peril but they never finished it when they decided to change it to be Mary Jane and the original scene involves her looking at the news and seeing that Venom was Eddie and showing up at the final battle to see what happens so that's all they shot again like I said they shot some scenes for her in distress but they never finished everything so it wouldn't make sense to make a ultracut with her in it since there's not much footage of her and distress but everything else that she shot at the battle site was intended for her to be witnessing what happens to Eddie and Spider-Man
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS also the entire Venom versus Spider-Man fight was a lot longer and more graphic is Sam Raimi Spider-Man 3 remix Extended Cut Sony yes please and thanks
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS 8:28 I urge you to look at that scene again as they are in each other's arms dancing and they are dancing and they're happy of each other they are forgiving of each other they are loving of each other in this moment and it's absolutely beautiful and sweeping and the music perfectly surmises the sweeping and epic nature of them finally back together and so like I said I urge you to see and watch that scene again and see experience and feel the emotional brevity and epicness of the scene of Peter and Mary Jane
Gwen being the hostage doesn't make any sense for the story because Eddie's motivations don't matter, it's about Peter and harry. Ultimately MJ was the one they both loved so it's the only thing that could bring them together, but raises the emotional stakes to a personal level. Plus it works for Eddie too, it makes him more sadistic to go after a girl Peter loved that meant nothing to him. The only reason to make Gwen the hostage is to validate the one scene from earlier and I don't buy that.
One thing I think you might have forgotten regarding the Editor's Cut: even though Bernard doesn't outright spell out that Norman died by his own hand, Peter *did* tell Harry earlier in the film that Norman killed himself trying to kill him. At the time, Harry might not have believed him, but he most likely chose to believe those words in the final act when he goes to help Peter.
I wish more films would get alternate cuts like this, recontextualizing the film with new footage and music.
Oh yes I completely agree! It’s amazing how even the most minor of adjustments can completely change the tone of certain things
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS Just wondering why there was never a expended edition of Spiderman 1 , or a director's cut ? I would like to see that , if there is any footage they had filmed that was still around , and could be used maybe? as SPiderman 2 got like extended editions and so did spiderman 3
Removing any Rosemary Harris Aunt May scene is a sin.
Nah, it just reinforces how infantilized the theatrical cut made the characters, constantly needing outside forces to push them into doing the right thing.
@@nope5657 You don't agree with what The Gargantuan Apple has to say about the scene?
@@nope5657I agree.
Them removing the Aunt May scene at the end ruined the flow of the third act. It felt like they rushed to the ending. The Sand Castle scene was supposed to happen after Peter got rid of the symbiote and was supposed to be the way Sandman meets Venom. They cut that part from the Editor's Cut for obvious reasons.
I thought the same, there’s another jarring cut from the shower scene right to Venom meeting Sandman in the Editor’s Cut and it really doesn’t work.
Exactly. Like the editor had no clue what made the movie work or why things were done, he just tried to fit it under the existing runtime for whatever reason and lopped an important scene. Even the butler scene, which I don't really miss and kind of like Harry going to help Peter without ever really knowing if he killed Norman or not, was put in by Raimi for a reason that made sense to him. He's doing a riff on Frank Capra movies where an unimportant side character holds the key to unlocking what the more central one knows deep inside. I trust the director more than a random editor.
@@brentandrew2419 That Editor has been collaborating with Raimi since Darkman, he even edited the new Doctor Strange movie for Raimi. If anybody knows Raimi, it's him.
@@ericdxfan511 Except he went against Raimi's (final) cut of the movie. I don't buy that Raimi told him to take the Aunt May scene out, I really don't. Raimi had a falling out with Elfman too at one time.
@@brentandrew2419 I don’t think it was a case of Raimi telling him to take the scene out, more that the scene wasn’t in there to begin with and was part of the reshoots, with the editor’s cut going back to a version of the film that existed before the reshoots…
I personally feel you need the scene of Peter trying to reach out to MJ because it shows that deep down he does care and has just lost his way.
As far as the suit moving it’s so subtle. I thought my mind was playing tricks on me the first time I watched it.
I saw this movie in theaters when I was 6. So I guess that’s why I loved the movie to this day, convoluted plot and goofiness included.
I was about 10 or 11. This was the most intense theater experience I'd ever had at the time, haha.
If Sony were to do another new cut of Spider-Man 3, let this be the extended cut or a newer version of the movie.
1. Bring back all the deleted scenes that were in the editors cut
2. Use a mix of both Christopher Young and Danny Elfmans score that is best suited to the scene
3. Restore some of the missing scenes abandoned in the editors cut from the theatrical cut
4. Keep the arranged scenes from the editors cut as they flowed a bit better in terms of pacing compared to the theatrical cut
5. Even more scenes that didn’t make it to the final cut like the character Dr. Wallace talking to Sandman
6. More Venom
Then, you got yourself the definitive version of Spider-Man 3 that Sam Raimi originally intended to show.
Won't happen sadly, and raimi hated venom so that last point is kinda wrong
And also bring back Animatronic Venom and unused Black suit
Sam Raimi's original vision won't return back anymore. That was lost in the moment his producer asked him to bring Venom in the movie
@@alessiospurio Yeah i agree
And also add Venom’s original death.
I saw Spiderman 2 and 3 in theaters and to this day those are still two of my top ten favorite Theater Experiences.
With this video, here's how I'm gonna rewatch Spider-Man 3:
-Editor's cut as a base
-restore Norman's lines
-restore the Aunt may scene
-use the theatrical ending score
Hopefully we uncover more deleted scenes so we can get a proper extended/director's cut (even if it has to be fanmade)
I would also add the scene with Mr. Ditkovich here, but it would be after Peter gets rid of the black suit and after the dialogue between Peter and Aunt May.
@@The_Maxym Oh, that be an interesting way to put that scene back in while keeping the isolation feeling for Peter earlier in the movie.
@@kieranprior3873 What insulation do you mean?
@@The_Maxym Not Insulation, Isolation. That is Peter becoming alone due to the symbiote's influences causing him to push others away (it was mentioned in the video)
@@kieranprior3873 Sorry, my fault. And thanks for the explanation. By the way, I forgot to say that you can restore the scene where Bernard tells Harry the truth about his father's death. But this will happen before Mary Jane is captured and Peter comes to Harry for help.
What i love most about the editors cut is the rearrangement of Peter outting Eddie and his fight with Harry in the theatrical version he beats up Harry then outs Eddie and it feels like he went bad too fast then goes to petty office drama. With the editors cut it feels like a steady downwards progression from outting Eddie and almost killing Harry then ultimately hitting MJ which makes him see the errors of his way. Idk it just feels like a better progression into darkness for Pete to me
The reshoot for the Peter and Harry scene was the Theatrical Version. The Editor’s Cut version was the one used in the Novelization.
Ah yep, I thought so!
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS the Interscope is the better scene because there is still that animosity between them but it's a lot more playful with their anger instead of straight up tiers angry and Harry is just being better it's a lot better but I don't hate the theatrical cut either I love both scenes the editors cut is just getting to the point quicker and it's just better looking and it just the better scene
With No Way Home really bringing attention back to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man universe, and really hope we will get the footage from Spider-Man 3 that seems to have been lost to time. Also, it seems Raimi himself is very willing to return for Spider-Man 4 now with Tobey, as well as several of the other actors who were part of the original trilogy (Kirsten Dunst and Thomas Haden Church); so you've got most of the main players willing to do it, it's now just up to the studio. It would be very cool of Sony, if they actually decide to move forward with Spider-Man 4 with Tobey Maguire, to release a revised version of the third film OR - if that's too expensive - just dump all of the footage on a re-release of the film in maybe a deleted/alternate/extended scene format. It's always drove me crazy that many of the scenes in the trailers for Spider-Man 3 back in 2006 and 2007, were never featured in the actual film. The hype for the third film was unparalleled back in the day, and I spent countless hours on different forums and pre-RUclips video sharing sites rewatching the trailers countless times. To see some of what I was so hyped for not come to fruition in the final cut of the film was disappointing, and I hope I'll get to see it one day. But, even if not, a new Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire Spider-Man film in the 2020s would be pretty damn awesome!
Okay but why is Ursula saying “you’re a good boy” awakening some feelings tho 😂
Ahaaa, I get it 😂
He is a....good boy. He must be in some kind of trouble
I want to see the uncut final battle with Peter pulling out Eddie but all he's able to pull out is his skeleton (with a "venomized" skull) because Venom had already absorbed him and was just using his skeleton as a framework to move around. It's theorized because of that, that any prior scenes of "Eddie" Venom talking/fighting with Spiderman was actually just Venom using Eddie's body as a puppet and that Eddie had already been gone mentally until he assimilated him. Apparently that was cut because testing audiences found it too disturbing.
In the editors cut of when Peter and Harry are about to fight, i think a nice little detail I noticed is that when Harry asks "what took you so long?" and it pans over to Peter on that sofa, it looks like the exact sofa that Spider-man layed Normal down on at the end of the first movie.
One pattern I noticed is that the reshoots in the theatrical cut tend to have brighter lighting, like the Ursula scene and the Peter vs. Harry pre-fight talk. Also, Maguire and Franco seem less bulky in the theatrical version.
I wonder if it was intentional or if the lighting crew had to make new setups without any available reference to how it was before.
Seems a lot of the reshoots were shoddily done in general. The best example is them seemingly losing the steel blade prop from the final fight, if you look close at the part where Peter breaks out of Venom’s web restraints and grabs the steel blade he was smacked with before, you will notice that after he swings it, it cuts to him slapping venom in the face with a bent metal pipe instead. This was originally meant to follow into venom being sliced through his side (?) and becoming what I can only describe as a monster straight from The Thing, or Sam Raimi’s visual representation of like revenge or rage or whatever lol.
20:29 listening to Ursala say “you’re good boy” does things to me 💀
I am watching the editors edition right now and I really do enjoy the way everything flows together and how dark it is. I decided to watch it after watching this video. With it being not as long, I thought it was going to be a lesser version of the movie. Thank you so much for this video.
Need a 1 hour loop of Ursula saying “you’re a good boy”
(19:44) At least in both versions, Peter still apologises to Ursula. 👍🏻
Also, as Peter opens the trunk and looks at the suit, there's a barely-audible voice whispering " *come back to us* "
Hard to disagree with anything you said here. Wish we could have a best of all world's edit.
The point of the editors cut version was also about Harry giving up vengeance to retain his friendship. Also to finally get out of the shadows of his father.
I very much appreciated both of your videos on the differences between the different cuts of these films. I’ve never been huge fan of the third film, but I really appreciated how in depth you went into the story beats of both versions. I might have to try the editor’s cut and see if that changes my experience.
Thank you very much! Really glad you enjoyed both of the videos
Definitely give it a go and see if it makes the experience a bit different!
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I just finished my rewatch of the whole trilogy: Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2.1, both of which I’ve always loved, and then Spider-Man 3: Editor’s Cut, for the first time. I’ve seen the theatrical cut of 3 many times and liked it less and less each rewatch. I was utterly shocked at how much I enjoyed watching the E.C. It’s amazing how much of a difference it makes when the proper music, structure, and storytelling is there. I felt like I was finally watching the proper part 3 to Sam Raimi’s previous two films. It’s definitely still the weakest of the three, as there are many flaws still present, but somehow this version took a movie I otherwise didn’t like, into a movie I actually enjoyed. I don’t think I’ll ever watch the theatrical cut again, it’s the Editor’s Cut for me. I thank you once again for your amazing commentary and analysis that contributed greatly to my newfound appreciation for this version of the film!
@@leiaarianabonny4999 Brilliant! Really happy to hear you've a newfound appreciation for the film now, thanks again for the kind words about the video!
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS you should take a look at a scene you forgot to talk about at the Harry in the hospital scene in the editors cut the music along with the tone of the scene makes it seem like Harry is lying about having amnesia that's why it's very suspenseful going into the scene in the cut!!
Today's the 15th anniversary of Spider-Man 3. Hopefully Sony will #ReleaseTheRaimiCut and give fans the 3 hour R-Rated cut of the film.
Why would it be r rated 😂😂😂 nothing shown here warrants a r rating
there needs to be a Director's cut of the film ... as then Sam Raimi would have been able to maybe add more scenes or reshoot scenes , still I guess it is ok that we got a editor's cut
One of the biggest strengths of the Raimi trilogy was the awesome cast of memorable side characters. Sacrificing them for agency hurts the picture in my opinion
TASM 2 needs a Directors cut. Restore all the Harry and Goblin scenes. It would be sooo good.
I’d really love to see Young’s score released someday, it’s one of the last well thought out superhero scores in the last few years, in my opinion. It was great to hear some old material in NWH, but it never felt genuine, as if a higher up told Giacchino he could only use themes in specific places. (Elfman’s Peter Parker theme was used too much, would’ve preferred more uses of the Spidey theme) I’m fine with the leaked sessions here on RUclips, but I feel like there’s something more special about owning a physical copy of a score, especially this one.
Thank you SO MUCH for pointing out the weird black bars closing in on the new scenes. It is also briefly noticeable in Spider-Man 2.1 and The Amazing Spider-Man.
No worries! It’s very strange isn’t it? I’m not really sure how it even happened, especially because you’d think it’d be relatively easy to fix. Can’t say I noticed in 2.1 tho…
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I think during the train fight in 2.1, the bars on the side close in.
20:50
I much prefer the theatrical version of this scene. Ursula being excited for Peter that MJ called back even though she has a crush on him is such a sweet character moment for her. She just wants Pete to be happy. The editors cut is just a boring dialogue exchange.
I agree that's probably the only part I wish stayed the same as the original. Well maybe that and Aunt May talking to Pete after he tries to give back the ring
6:39 This proves that music can make a world of difference.. It's amazing and beautiful. The editors cut was better in my opinion because it added more depth as you watched and listened.
The black suit scene in the daylight needed to be extended. And had more cgi work
One of the changes I’m very conflicted with has to be the interaction between Harry and Peter before they fight.
I think the one in the Editor’s Cut is really good because of the callback to Norman’s body on the sofa with Peter laying in that exact spot and the very casual nature of how the two talk before brawling. That said, one thing that has always bugged me is the segue into Harry’s line about how MJ used to kiss him. Something about it never jived with me, especially with Peter suddenly being visibly pissed.
The theatrical cut, I also like because of how Harry actually calls out Peter on his lack of care for MJ while also rubbing the rekindling of his own relationship with her in his face. There’s also a neat juxtaposition of Peter’s “What did you do to her” because it can be interpreted as him either acting selfishly or selflessly since Harry did force Peter and MJ’s breakup but Peter already treated MJ poorly. But this version of the scene only works in the context of the theatrical cut since the order of scenes makes the fight the start of Peter’s downfall where he’s still got some good left in him while the editor’s cut places it later in it so it makes sense he’s less serious and more jokey, especially when the dance sequence comes after the fight.
This is a great job what you have done here. I want more spiderman 3 content and scenes that never got released
19:00 Actually, you can remove the scene entirely. Just imply that Harry had been faking his amnesia the entire time so he could manipulate Peter and MJ.
Can’t believe it took so long for this to get recommended to me. Fantastic coverage!
I don't love SM3, but I've come around on it quite a bit. It's like this old joke: "I used to think you were a screw up, but so many screw ups have come along since that you've advanced in line without doing anything." That describes my feelings toward the film. It isn't great, but it's placement has risen because of what's come after, especially just in the last couple of years. It is frustrating movie, but it understands storytelling (a rarity now) and I can sense it trying very hard to make everyone happy, it just serves too many masters. I also think it gets more right than it gets credit for. Anyway, I think the newer cut is slighter better and I'll take it.
One thing I noticed about the Editor's Cut in the second act was that Peter's clothes had the proper continuity. In the theatrical cut, he wears a light blue collar when meeting MJ at the bridge. However, when he sees Harry, he's wearing a jacket with a navy blue shirt, which leads to the scene where he's silent in his room, but he's wearing the collar again.
It goes back and forth in the theatrical cut but the Editor's cut has a clearer order
I always wondered about the black suit during the daylight that we never saw in action except for commercials.
Wow, your commentary on the comparison is astounding. Plus the accent, wow
So basically the only time the Peter and MJ Theme is in the Theatrical Cut is when Harry Dies
Wow, not gonna lie before your comment I hadn’t even clocked that the music when Harry Dies is a variation of the Peter/MJ theme, good catch!
As clunky as the theatrical version is for Harry's turn, it's still the better version.
Looking at a picture shouldn't be enough of a change for Harry. I don't think that's any sort of real emotional catalyst at all.
Bernard telling Harry what I believe Harry knew all along finally breaks his denial, and his drive to uphold his idealistic image of his father. It also rhymes with Pete's version of this with Aunt May - an older parental figure's love being able to break Harry/Peter out of their emotionally-blind loneliness.
For all this talk of agency, all the Editor's Cut did was make the world feel small and lonely. It feels colder, but that goes against the very themes of the movie. People were always there to help and love both Peter and Harry - they were just too blind to see or too proud to ask.
The Editor's Cut makes it feel as if they truly didn't have help.
Im sorry but that shot of Peter's face as he's smiling looking at the suit in the trunk is so cursed 😂
Now we just need a fan re-edit to get the best of both worlds
I didn't know about this version and this video was both fascinating and very well made!
I swear there were soooo many different versions. I remember when I was young and watch it at the cinemas compared to DVD, was sooo different! Then watching it again as an adult it's still sooo different!
Release 'Spider-Man 3.1' (Extended Cut)
This petition is about the 2007 blockbuster film, 'Spider-Man 3'. Although the film was a success, as time went on, many unused scenes and deleted footage have resurfaced on the Internet over the past 12 years. Leading many to speculate what could exist and what could be added into the original cut.
Numerous sources online confirm the existence of many unused scenes that never made the original cut or editor's cut. Many unused scenes that we the fans would love to see used in an extended version of the film. (3.1) in 2007, Sony Pictures Entertainment released 'Spider-Man 2.1' an extension of the original film in an effort to reinstate unused scenes and drive hype towards the upcoming 'Spider-Man 3'.
In 2017, Sony Pictures Entertainment released the Blu-Ray box set of all 5 of the previous 'Spider-Man' films with an added 'Spider-Man 3 Editor's Cut' in order to drive up interest for the upcoming film 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'. The Editors Cut was created to add back the original score from Christopher Young that was unused from the original version of 'Spider-Man 3' as well as a plot restructuring with different scenes that were shot, so as to make the Editor's Cut an alternate version of the original film. However, there are still many unused scenes that are yet to be reinstated in a version of the film.
We the fans are eternally grateful that Sony continues to support the 'Spider-Man' franchise and community. The 'Spider-Man' franchise has generated millions of dollars in revenue and has created hours upon hours of happy content and entertainment. Even though the Sam Raimi Spider-Man Series has concluded, we as fans of the original trilogy are still as passionate about our favorite webhead than ever.
We the fans would love to see the many unused/deleted scenes reinstated in an extended cut of 'Spider-Man 3'. (3.1). So as we can have closure to the deleted scenes that have floated around since 2007. Please consider our request. Thank you.
I didn't knew for the score ! That was very interessant ! Great job ! 😄
Thank you very much!
Elfman’s Peter and MJ theme is my favorite piece of music ever written so it’s definitely weird hearing a different one.
Yeahhhh I definitely had that at first, but as time’s gone on I think it’s really nice to have something different for this point in their relationship, which is also why I prefer the Theatrical music at the end, I quite like having that theme return for a happy (ish) ending
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I can’t say the new themes were bad. I saw the editors cut included with my Digibook Trilogy and I was looking for videos to gauge if it was worth watching. Yours was the first I saw and I’m sold. Thanks for the excellent work
Excellent video, man. The editing is magnificent and your script is very in-depth and easy to follow. Well thought out. Sending love!
I actually own the 4K set, and never knew that this editors version was included
I love the nod to the Spider-Man 3 bloopers at the end there
Haha, glad someone noticed!
I seen Spider-Man 3 in theaters 17 years ago, and watched again on Disney+, but never watched the Editor’s cut on Blu-ray, or digital.
Haven’t seen the editor’s cut, but I must say the decision to remove other characters’ impact on the leads’ ultimate decisions is baffling. For a movie in which every villain (including Spidey) becomes worse by venturing further into isolation, the redemption being triggered by others reaching out is one of the only truly emotional catharses of this film. Even more baffling is to do that WHILE LEANING FURTHER INTO the addiction metaphor. If you want to make a statement about addiction, removing a “recovery through human connection” theme seems like the last thing you would want to do.
Best scene imo is Aunt May explaining Uncle Ben’s proposal at the beach. It’s one of the best scenes with great dialogue
13:40 actually, it does still fit because if you look closely when Peter lifts up the suit, you can see the spider symbol before the transition
such a great video 10/10 would love to see more of these
24:44 I love Tobey's hairstyle in this movie when the black suit takes over. "he looks emo" ok but he looks cool tho can't lie
This was beltin’ - thanks for wracking it all up so nicely!
Thanks a lot Chris!
No lie after being very curious about the Editors Cut for Spider Man 3 I recently saw a video on Facebook of today showing Theatrical Cut and Editor Cut was being compared to side by side,The editor cut was so dark that I had to literally replay the Facebook video and to see Eddie Brock being nothing but a walking skeleton and a corpse from the symbiote eating his entire life away definitely scared me.
Seeing that ending made me shocked as Peter Parker seeing Eddie entire face and body was nothing left but a skeleton definitely gave me chills and spooked me out. So….I had to look into deeper and do my research which I came across this video.
Thank you so for explaining and showing some things from both versions and different comparisons because some scenes in the editors cut I wish they kept it but I can see why they didn’t.
Another thing I would like to mention is the structure scene in the editor cut got me lowkey laughing because who in the right mind will kill their best friend and then after that feeling good about it and dancing like nothing ever happened? 😂 it’s DARK but I’m glad they reorganized the structure scenes because if SPM3 would’ve came out in this generation especially with the editor cut….It would’ve been cancelled.
I get why the Ursula scene was changed for the editors cut but the other version of it feels so stilted and unnatural. I mean I guess it makes sense because they’re awkward with eachother because of him blowing up at them
I came here right after the Spider-Man 2 video. Also this video is valuable content and was worth watching for me. Thanks for making it.
I like Spider-Man 3 but I never saw the editors cut, because it's relatively new and not available on german sites. So I will probably need to buy it on an US site.
First of all the alternate score soundtrack is a nice addition to the 4k bluray version. Good to know!
It seems like the Editors Cut is a great version of the movie, but hold down due to some removals for more independent character choices. This seems like an odd change at some points and I agree with you, that some of the removed scenes were important.
The editor had the one time chance to give us some more deleted scenes. He kinda had the power and responsibility, but didn't used it. Or wasn't allowed to used it. Sad.
Spider-Man 3 is in such a broken condition. Too many story lines at once because of Sony. And now we have two different cuts, but the second one seems like rushed. Because of Sony. :(
I stumbled upon your vid on a reddit post, didn't expect to finish the whole video. Great content! thank you and keep it up. Would love to see more of similar style of comparison analysis content. Subscribed.
Ahhh thank you so much, that’s very kind! I’m hoping to do more stuff like this in the future so stay tuned!
Out of interest actually, do you have a link to the Reddit post that you found this on? Would be interested to see!
i wish we could get an extended version with all removed content from eddie visiting gwen's house, dr wallace scenes.. that would be dope. And the alternate final where eddie is only bones
This is something else!
17:28 I remember seeing this from the trailer and it was one of the deleted scenes
I love the Buttler scene Harry needs to learn the truth of his father another way instead of peter
I did not like it when they removed the aunt may scene either since i feel like it still would work and its a key scene even for the editor's cut. I totally agree with keeping some of the theatrical soundtrack since that matched way better that new ones. But those new scenes were absolutely fantastic additions to the movie. I actually made an edit of the movie myself where it has some of the removed scenes and new elements of the editor's cut. And yh I've noticed the black side bars on the new scenes while editing 😂.
I wish they would have taken more time and even get Raimi to improve it more, but either way its great to have another version that adds to the story significantly.
Great video!!
Great Video!!! Really love the in depth review
theatrical cut: yeah we stopped a cheat in the newspapers
editors cut: yeah i killed my best friend
Here is my arrangement of the scenes in the Editor's Cut (I returned 3 scenes that were in the Theatrical Cut but were deleted in the Editor's Cut): After the dance scene, Peter and Gwen go to a jazz club. After the shower scene, the dialogue between Peter and Aunt May begins. Then there is the scene where the butler tells Harry the truth about his father's death. Next, the Sandman gets out of the sewers and the scene with the castle. And the last scene is where Peter apologizes to Mr. Ditkovich. Well, then everything is as it was in the Editor's Cut.
Editor's cut feels darker
29:27 same
At least he’s like “as long as it’s not peter”
I feel like we need a new cut that combines the best aspects of both
0:59 edited Spider-Man‘s body with venom’s head from shot from the movie
Oh yeah, I hate that cover 🤣 They seem to do that a lot though funnily enough. Another one is putting the symbiote logo on the red & blue suit for boxsets and stuff, it’s annoying
@@TheGargantuanAppleHMPBTS I do like the covers with both the normal suit in the black suit though
Excellent discussion.
10:10 Another very cool somewhat hidden feature for Spider-Man 3 is the PSP disc being the only official release for the open matte version of the movie. The best version of the movie, to me, and it sucks it's not more known and available. I prefer more image over 4K anyday. It's maybe possible to use a computer to find the open matte in other releases disc files.
Really great video, i remember watching your video about the editor's cut of spiderman 2, im glad you made a sequel, also an editor's cut of spiderman 1 exists?
Thanks, glad you enjoyed!
As far as I’m aware, just the one version of Spidey ‘02 exists…
They made an editor's cut of Spider-Man 3? Well, this is news to me.
would be interesting to see a 4th cut that is basically editors cut but with a couple things added back such Aunt may.
A fan made such a cut.
Amazing video! Great way of breaking it down.
Thanks so much!!
Never realized the change in music with the editors cut till now
Dude the biggest crime of the raimi trilogy is not having the score for 3 released, 1 and 3s score made me cry, especially 3, sandmans theme and Harry's deaths theme is so sad man
I'm kind of disappointed that they still left out the symbiote jumpscare, when Peter is looking in the mirror. That was the scene that was only used for the teaser trailer.
Editors cut is legendary & we will never get it💔
Editor's Cut should have restored the scene where Peter hallucinates Venom in a mirror while wearing the black suit. The final film just hard cuts to him removing the suit looking kind of nervous/scared, but that reaction makes no sense without that context.
I don’t think Harry needed to find out how his father died… because he essentially knew and was in denial due to his daddy issues
It’s not as if Peter didn’t try to tell him this in the movie already. But it just makes Harry angrier and go “shut upppppp!”
If this movie got released the way it was intended we might have gotten one of the most dark superhero movies ever
Still the best in the trilogy cuz its actually good and it realizes its a spider-man film
Super underrated, as usual :)
Thank you!
A lot of the editing decisions in the editor’s cut remind me of the movie’s novelization, especially the order of the scenes.