Rabbi Tovia Singer Destroys Christian Attack Video on Virgin Birth!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
- Help us combat aggressive Jewish evangelism in Israel: outreachjudais...
Let’s Get Biblical Study Guide (Volume 1 & 2) outreachjudais...
outreachjudais...
www.videvo.net
/ tenaktalk
Music: www.purple-pla...
Use in accordance with Israel's Copyright Law 5768-2007 section 27a.
Music at the end: Adon Olam • ''Adon Olam'' (Eternal...
www.toviasinger...
#toviasinger #Judaism #Christianity #Messiah #joerogan
Thank you Rabbi.
❤ Rabbi. Continue to correct and teach a Christian like me who left Christianity few months ago .
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j you’re just making up nonsense the Hebrew sages always said the meaning of these words were as they are עלמה Maiden בתולה Virgin
Isaiah 7:11,14
Although, Isaiah does not say virgin it certainly implies a young unmarried girl which in this context would be a virgin.
A sign from Hashem would classify this sign as a miracle in the context of Isaiah 7:11,14.
Therefore, when Hashem says I will give you a SIGN this would imply that a young maiden (usually a unmarried woman) would have a child. The miraculous part is that she would be a virgin as the Jewish Prophet Matthew is revealing the Isaiah prophecy.
Let Hashem teach you and not a man.
Tovia will stand before G-d and give an account for every word he has spoken against Hashem.
@ it’s actually speaking of his wife, so no definitely not
@@elimahanhupa9596
First sign Yeshua gave of His return:
Let no man deceive you…
That includes Rabi’s.
Walk with Hashem and you will see Yeshua.
@@VictorRivers-hz2eb do you even listen to the rabbi's videos or talks? Do you ever research what he says to double check? Do you follow the arguments closely enough to make an argument against the rabbi's videos?
Dont sell self short. Story of Isaiah had me on the edge of my seat! Keep up the good work, you are changing people's minds ..Shalom Rabbi..
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j Show us the scripture that proves Singer wrong. The only thing you have are text taken out of context
Rabbi Singer in a way it is a compliment that they portray you as an ancient talmudic sage, what an honor!
Just to show we are the same people like the past, different times but same traditions...
I doubt they mean it as an honor. If they thought they could get away with it, they would portray him as “the happy merchant”, or something from “Der Stürmer”. These people are crypto-National Socialists.
I just wanted to say the same👍I like the hood😁
Thank You Rabbi Singer. You should start a ' Hebrew for Christians' boot camp. So many are simply scared to learn beyond what they've been taught, and it would be great if there were some way to ignite their confidence so they would at least try. There's simply not enough Jewish community and support where I live, but hanging in there. You're a major inspiration. Thanks again!🎉
Basically, that's what Rabbi Singer's and Rabbi Michael Skobac's videos are! They're outreach Rabbis, whose purpose is to bring back Jews to Judaism, who are currently trapped in Christianity, through ignorance of their own Hebrew scriptures. I've been learning from both of these extremely learned and beloved Rabbis, for the past 20+ years (not born Jewish - was a former, born-again, baptized, Evangelical Baptist Christian).
I think some of that fear comes from Christians being afraid to be ousted by other Christians for not believing anymore. Christians in general from my personal experience love to love each other but outsiders are treated almost as badly as scientologists treat outsiders. It's a scary time to denounce Christianity if you're in that deep.
@k.w9805Baruch HaShem! Welcome home.
@@AdaraBalabusta Thank you. ❣️
@@User-x5s3x
Welcome to the tribe!
That was FANTASTIC evidence! Thank you, Rabbi.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j
It’s right there in the Hebrew Bible.
You need to learn Hebrew and read the chapters and verses in its proper context.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j
Stands alone? It’s Judaism 101.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j No. In fact, I heard this same argument forty years ago and have read it since.
😂 he and his optimus 😢
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9jRabbi Tovia Singer certainly does not stand alone in his interpretation- all the classical commentators agree. Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Radak, and Rabbi Yosef Kara all explain that "alma" in Isaiah 7:14 means a young woman, not a virgin. The Torah itself proves this in Exodus 2:8 and Proverbs 30:18-19, where "alma" is used without any implication of virginity. If Isaiah had meant "virgin," it would have used "betulah," as seen in Genesis 24:16 and Leviticus 21:13. The Christian claim is based on a mistranslation from the Septuagint, not the original Hebrew.
Not a Christian nor a Jew but I'm interested in these topics, after having heard both sides and looking it up myself it's very obvious that most of the prophecies invoked by Christians aren't even prophecies to begin with or aren't about the Messiah, and their translations are very dubious to say the least. It's a religion based on dishonesty and corruption which are not very good foundations for anything.
You are a very honest person. Can you imagine if the Christian world were as honest as you?
@@kashrut18 Thank you for you kind words, I guess it's hard to face something like this if your whole life has been dependent on believing it, it's easier if you have no 'conflict of interest', you just need to look at what the original text is saying, and it's easier than ever with modern technology.
ALL religions are based on dishonesty. ALL OF THEM
I have good news for you! YOU too are a son of God! When God calls Israel His "Firstborn", by implication, that means that ALL of mankind are His children! As the teaching in the Chapters of Rabbi Elezar states, " I swear by heaven and earth, that ANY man or woman, Jew or Gentile, slave of maidservant, that serves the God of heaven, an achieve prophecy and everlasting life!"
You are ignorant like the "great" Rabbi. Do you consider yourself wiser than the prophets. Wiser than Simon and Anna in the temple I suppose?
Absolutely incredible breakdown. The question about the dual prophecy, "who is the first virgin?" just brilliant, fully enlightening! Love you Rabbi Singer, ❤ the light reached me all the way down in New Orleans! Baruch Hashem!
Hey, I grew up in Nawlins! Went to Newman (don't hold it against me, hated it!) 😅 You? Ended up in Israel becoming religious and studying in Yeshiva for 8 years!
That ancient picture of you Rabbi looking like an apostle is hysterical
Even if isaiah 7:14 was a virgin birth it would only matter for Ahaz. Not in the future. I was a christian. I felt really stupid when i took my time and read the whole bible critically. Now, i am a Noahide. I believe that Israel is God's son and only son, the suffering servant, and the messiah is the next generation of Davidic kings forever. Thank you, Tovia. I love you very much. Now, i am trying to get my charismatic mother to leave the foolishness of church.
Indeed, Isaiah was conveying that the prophecy would be fulfilled extremely soon, in his generation. God wants to mend King Ahaz’s fear about impending war, he is surrounded by enemies, and it’s utterly superfluous to mention a virgin birth 700 years in the future, for Ahaz requires only a sign relevant to him.
@k.w9805Jesus taught that one could despise one’s parents. See Matthew 10 v 35-36.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9jAnd your book has that as the first commandment? Big statement from someone that cant count to three.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j why do you keep repeating the first commandment? It seems like you don’t understand what you’re reading or writing. You obviously don’t know the purpose of Passover, which Jews have been doing for the past 3300 + years
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j מה אתה אומר אז בא נמשיך בעברית אם לא הבנתי נכון מה אתה כותב
A major stumbling block for Islam as well.
We don’t base our beliefs on misinterpreted Biblical scriptures, we base our belief on what the Quran says. A fact that Rabbi knows very well.
The reason he addresses Christians on the topic and never Muslims is because Christians, intentionally or unintentionally, distort the Jewish scriptures to fit into their preconceived agenda.
Isaiah 7:11,14
Although, Isaiah does not say virgin it certainly implies a young unmarried girl which in this context would be a virgin.
A sign from Hashem would classify this sign as a miracle in the context of Isaiah 7:11,14.
Therefore, when Hashem says I will give you a SIGN this would imply that a young maiden (usually a unmarried woman) would have a child. The miraculous part is that she would be a virgin as the Jewish Prophet Matthew is revealing the Isaiah prophecy.
Let Hashem teach you and not a man.
Tovia will stand before G-d and give an account for every word he has spoken against Hashem.
@ "we base our belief on what the Quran says." Precisely. And the Quran is very clear that Jesus of Nazareth was born of a virgin mother. And as the Rabbi made very clear, it was Christian mythmaking. It becomes a stumbling block for all believing Muslims.
@@wisergreener7394 Not really, Rabbi says it’s an unlikely interpretation based on such and such Biblical evidences. We base our evidences on the truth of the Quran. When Allah swt says something in the Quran, we believe it because we have already found our proof that Islam is true. This can be based on testing the Quran itself or by reading the biography of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh, or by some subjective personal experience. What we don’t do is twist Jewish scripture to make the claim of Immaculate Conception.
@@viobull5548”unlikely interpretation”….? The interpretation was very clear. According to the Rabbi, it was completely made up by Matthew. You, as a believing muslim, have to make a decision; who is telling the truth, the Rabbi or the Quran.
I took your advice Rabbi Singer and checked for myself. That is why I know you speak the truth and the video is untrue. For me the mistranslation of
“ Is With Child and will bear a son” is worse than saying all young women are virgins. The exact same quote is actually translated properly in Gen 16:11 talking about Hagar and Ishmael:
יא וַיֹּ֤אמֶר לָהּ֙ מַלְאַ֣ךְ יְהוָ֔ה הִנָּ֥ךְ הָרָ֖ה וְיֹלַ֣דְתְּ בֵּ֑ן וְקָרָ֤את שְׁמוֹ֙ יִשְׁמָעֵ֔אל כִּֽי־שָׁמַ֥ע יְהוָ֖ה אֶל־עָנְיֵֽךְ׃ 11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her: 'Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son; and thou shalt call his name Ishmael,
I provide the Hebrew and the correct translation, as they do in every other case except Isaiah 7:14. You don’t even need to be able to read the Hebrew to see their lie.
If anyone wishes a more detailed explanation I can provide the intricate grammatical details. It will be long but I don’t mind
@@Theravadadann: We are told by God, Himself, to learn from the Orthodox Rabbis, who have been tasked with interpreting the Hebrew scriptures for us.
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j They call it the 10 statements. not the 10 commandments. do your research Eddie
I❤ listening and learning from you!
I am so blessed to have you in my life!
We're all so blessed to have you!
Todah Rabah Rabbi Tovia Singer for all you do!
The Trinity makes no sense
Which is hilarious, because not all Christians believe it, and none can explain it! 😂
You are the image of the Father as A father of your own kingdom... you are also a image of the divine one as a son of the divine. Your holiness is your wisdom truth understanding, your lights (candles)...... you are the holy spirit, the son (image) of the father, representing him, as yourself. Be yourself, let no man take that away from you.
@@achildofthelight4725nonsensical
@@jjkatz holy spirit.... be ye holy as I am holy: the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
All these thing came from the Father (GOD) to the son (you as an image) Your character based on the spirits reflect the Father in you... if these spirits are not reflected from you, then the father in you is not one with the Father most high.
@@theunknownatheist3815
Génesis 18, Daniel 7, psalm 110
The truth is that it is permissible, but not obligatory, for a Gentile to read the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Bible. Instead of misinterpreting the Jewish Bible, they should focus on their obligatory study of the 7 Noahide laws.
TU
@@EdwardSchwarz-n9j The Chabad translation agrees with Rabbi Singer: "Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel."
Thankyou for Your Reaction, Peace & Happy Always.
❤ Indonesia Love You ❤.
Rabbi Tovia Singer, you buried Christianity 👍
Thank you Kavod HaRav! May HaShem continue to bless you.
Thank you so very much!! I have always questioned what we have been told. I was raised in Carholicism and it never felt right. I thirst for the knowledge of truth. This makes complete sense to me. Avid watcher of your videos. God definitely sent me to view as I have been praying for the truth.🙏
It should also be understood that Matthew is deliberately writing his story to incorporate themes and quotes from the Jewish Bible so he can say his story fulfills prophecy. It's like shooting an arrow at a blank wall and painting the target around it. It's just additional irony that most of Matthew's citations are misquoted or taken out of context.
I don't know anything about "Talmud sages", but read any academic commentary on Isaiah and you'll see that they agree with Singer on this. The idea that Isaiah 7:14 is a prophecy about a virgin birth is confined to Christian apologetics.
The only reference to Isaiah 7:14 in the Talmud I can find after a quick look is Soferim 4:8, which says nothing about the woman being a virgin. Ibn Ezra concurs that Immanuel is the name of the prophet Isaiah's son. Metzudat David thinks the woman is the wife of King Ahaz and says nothing about her being a virgin. Malbim argues that the sign intended by the pregnancy is not a supernatural event. Minchat Shai says nothing about virginity and is mainly concerned about whether the name Emmanuel is one word or two. So even a very cursory look at the various rabbinical commentators shows no disagreement with Singer.
Who specifically is "they"? I've just shown you that none of the major rabbinical commentators thought Isaiah 7:14 was about a virgin birth or even a miracle of any kind, contrary to the claim you began this thread with.
you wrote: "they [the Talmudic sages] all agree that it is a virgin birth prophesy."
I have not found a single example confirming your claim, and several examples refuting it. Malbim says no miraculous sign was intended by Isaiah's declaration, and the other commentators say the text describes a contemporary pregnancy (the wife of either Isaiah or Ahaz). The idea of a virgin birth does not seem to have even been a possibility worth discussing.
Interestingly, in the first century, Philo of Alexandria argued in various writings that Rachel, Leah, Sarah, Zipporah, and Tamar were directly impregnated by God as miraculous conceptions, so that idea was in the air when Matthew wrote his nativity story. That doesn't affect the original meaning of Isaiah 7:14, but it *does* mean that Hellenistic Jewish thinking at the time Matthew was writing could have influenced his literary approach.
@@InquisitiveBibleֿYou are correct. I have never heard of any Orthodox Jewish scholar who thinks Isaiah 7 is in any way implying a virgin birth.
It is only christian “scholars” who try to twist this verse into meanings never contained in the original Hebrew.
Very interesting indeed. Todah rabah! Thank you for the explanation!
In the Life of Brian, Mary most certainly isn't a virgin.
😅
Now that's a nice thumbnail.
What a wonderful explanation of how many devious twists the christian missionaries have to employ, just to change the true meaning of a verse, which they cherry picked, and take completely out of the context of all the surrounding verses of Isaiah! That’s how desperate they are to make some verse, somewhere, anywhere, in our precious תנ״ך sound a little bit like it’s talking about jc. It’s really pathetic, except for the fact that most people are not well versed in reading the original Hebrew, and they buy such nonsense.
Anyway, כל הכבוד , רבי
This was beautifully explained!
😂 😢
Thank you Rabbi.
Bless you &
Your family. ❤
i understood rabbi tovia singer. thank you it so clear to me since you explained it few months ago. and i echoed it what i learned from you rabbi.
G👑D blessed you🙌🕊Rabbi Tovia Singer.🙏
💛🧡❤💟🕊
and i am happy to watch your program Rabbi Tovia Singer. i thank GOD i have "kakampi" for what i have found in my reading it is not convincing to my knowledge. i opened up to my sster in the Lord and she nothing to answer and because i striving to learn more and readeth the Holy Scriptures of GOD even it is KJV. and i read the full four gospel of the Lord YESHUAH HAMASIACH. i realized that there is something lack or not match to the teaching of the Lord Jesus Christ. maybe the Lord allow it to test my faith. But i trust in the LORD GOD Almighty for He is the Creator of all things in the whole earth and the whole universe. All that had breath is from GOD. Selah.🙏💟🧡❤🕊
Looking forward to listing… and y’all, that thumbnail 😂
I have seen a prominent Christain (nice guy actually) so arrogant as to say Aba is not the Hebrew word for father and the prefix Ab/Av is the word itself. Anything to do with Hebrew be it the language, culture, or beleifs is entirely secondary to most Christains. They will make insistences on passages they have never read. About a language they dont speak. Its gotta stop. I feel like at some point, it's not evangelism and we truly need to correct the record.
Its the height of "CHUTZPAH" to preach to people who have studied in the original language since youth and who inherited the written law and the oral explanation and studied in an unbroken chain from Moses, by people who can't read or speak the language . Moreover everything about Christianity goes against the most basic and fundamental teachings of Judaism. Revolting
I count my self fortunate to have an unbroken line of Truth from the mouth of the Very Grandchild of Aaron the High Priest... I don't need
" Eronius " of the second century or Paul the deciever .
Thank you Rabbi❤
so glad you answered this question differently today. u made a good case.
This is brilliant!!!
Christianity is a hybrid of Greco-Roman paganism and Judaism. Look up the story of Greco-Roman god Attis. The similarities are quite impressive.
Jesus is clearly in Deuteronomy 13...the false prophet
Deuteronomy 18:18 you mean
Correct. Deuteronomy 13 v 2-12 sounds familiar. 😮
@@AdaraBalabusta
Deuteronomy 18:18
Isaiah 9 6
Isaiah 53
Isaiah 53:11
Psalms 45:6
Isaiah 49:6
Is Jesus you’re right
@justinsimns9177No. Jesus taught contrary to the Torah. The part of Deuteronomy 18 that applies to Jesus is verse 20: “But the prophet who intentionally speaks a word in My name, which I did not command him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.”
@@AdaraBalabustaLet us be a little objective, all we know about Jesus and of his "teachings" we know from Paul and the gospel writers, and all of them put all those words into his mouth. In my opinion, from what I understood, Paul is the false prophet. All the knowledge we have about Jesus is second hand.
The word septuagint sounds like a body part nobody wants to talk about. 😂
"My Septuagint is flaring up again!"
"I sold one of my septuagints for train money"
Todah Rabba!
You need to listen to this MULTIPLE times, AND take notes, and fact check each statement!
The rabbi is right on the main point. One can truly add that the child was already on the way - but can be seen as Ahaz first son / Hezekiah, who’s wife was already pregnant at the time.
Then even Isaias newborn son / Maher-shamal-hash-baz (his second son), and this child is like a “double proof” of the exact same point...
Namely, the mane point of Isa. 7:14 is that it’s not a prophesy about a 700 years later NT Jesus, but it’s talking about what’s going on at the time.
As we like to say, "a son teaches his father how to make children." If the Jews have the original text, in Hebrew, which they have studied and lived for thousands of years, then it cannot be said that the Jews do not know what they are talking about. We, Christians, have come the furthest in the story of Mary that she was a virgin in the sense that Joseph was her first man, that she was chaste before marriage, that it was in the context of morality. That is the only thing that holds water. And the Rabbi is right, virgin and maiden do not mean the same. And translating Hebrew through Google Translate and Wikipedia is not a scientific work. We all know that we have a billion questions about our faith, and we do not have the original texts. And we have changes in the texts in our languages. We also know that we have so many versions of the same Church. One interesting thing, how many exorcisms have been performed in Judaism, how many in Christianity and other religions? A Jew is perhaps closer to God, there is no reason to be possessed? The fact is, Jews deal with God, not devils.
Shalom Rabbi singer, clearly in Torah Leviticus 21 : 3,13,14 identify ba tu lah for virgin as in Job 31: 1 virgin is rendered the same as in Leviticus. I agree with your interpretation and pray that you continue to be blessed. Looking forward to the day of the messiah and a eternal house of prayer and wisdom, may be then the Ben Noach may receive the blessing to keep the sabbath holy and learn how to from the source!
I am so amazed as to the level of intelligence of this rabbi. With his very creative observation combined with his very long years of experience he was able to share his deepest knowledge about a very simple message of Proverbs 30:18 to 20.
There is however 1 question that I would like to ask.
If the woman stated in verse 19 was a "maiden" and not a "virgin" could the very intelligent rabbi still claim that nothing indeed happened between the man and the "not anymore virgin maiden"?
Thanks🙏🏾💕
Just FYI, The first appearance of the word “עלמה” (Almah) in the Torah is in Genesis 24:43:
Hebrew:
“הִנֵּה אָנֹכִי נִצָּב עַל עֵין הַמַּיִם, וְהָיָה הָעַלְמָה הַיּוֹצֵאת לִשְׁאֹב”
English (Translation):
“Behold, I stand by the well of water, and it shall come to pass that when the young woman comes out to draw water…”
I have controlled this in my Hebrew Bible and it is just as the Rabbi Tovia says. The Alma in Is. 7: 14 is already expecting a child a Child was already given in chapter 9. This is also confirmed in the teaching about Isaiah in the bookseries Maggid.
Awesome video!
Nonsense! Thank you rabbi tovia..
בראשית: כד: מג:
הִנֵּה אָנֹכִי נִצָּב, עַל-עֵין הַמָּיִם; וְהָיָה הָעַלְמָה, הַיֹּצֵאת לִשְׁאֹב, וְאָמַרְתִּי אֵלֶיהָ, הַשְׁקִינִי-נָא מְעַט-מַיִם מִכַּדֵּך
The missionaries accuse you of lying because they are lying. I suppose it's a compliment that they feel threatened by you. Well done, rabbi.
There is another argument Rabbi Singer...why a prophet would use the word "Alma" if he wanted to refer to a virgin when he has a precise word in the Hebrew language which is "Betula"? Prophets use precise words that are revealed to them by G-d.
Jesus cried on the cross " eli eli lema sabaktani?"
Simply meaning God wasn't with him.
The Queen of Sheba was a young woman when she had a OUT OF WEDLOCK child with King Solomon. This was a DISGRACE. She had to find a way out of that predicament and she did.
Headline: "Man nearly injured in traffic 'running for his life' after hearing word 'Septuagint'"
At the 21:20 point, it says they shall call is name Immanuel in Matthew1:23. Every version of bible I checked says Jesus not Immanuel.
And in Isaiah 7:14 it doesn’t say “THEY” will call the child Immanuel
It says “The young woman is with child, and SHE will give birth to a son and SHE will call his name, Immanuel
No “they” as Matthew changes the verse in so many ways!
Keep changing all the words and it simply is not the same sentence!
The original verse in Isaiah doesn’t say “virgin”at all and it doesn’t say “THEY’ will call him Immanuel
His name shall be called emmanuel..... the man was named Yeshua, the name in which he came in was salvation through the works that he did in the name of the Father.... God is with us, no matter how lonely you may feel, always there to lift us up, even if it means someone else is there for you to guide you along the way.
@@achildofthelight4725 what bible says Immanuel? Everyone says Jesus or Yeshua
@jaredviolin14 Matthew 1:21-23 KJV
[21] And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. [22] Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, [23] Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, And they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
Your name is Jared as given by your parents to be distinguished apart from others of different names... the work you do in your life will make a name for yourself to be known my for example, an artist, musician, architect... your name shall live on because of the works you do.
GOD shall be known by his fruits, the prophets that became the conduit between GOD and man, for man to be the image of man they were chosen to be, in the image of GOD.
@@achildofthelight4725 thank you. I re read it and now I realise I only read the first bit but now I completely understand. This is mind blowing. I became a christian almost two years ago and almost read the whole bible twice and a lot doesn't add up. Now i am thinking Jesus is fake. However what about Yahweh. Is god fake as well? I can,t imagone God needing to kill animals and even the prophets sometimes say God doesn't want sacrifice. I am vegan and I think killing animals is evil and has made so many problems for humanity just like religions. I had a experience like a temporary schizophrenia and I saw ghosts and felt something invisible coke me so I assumed it was demons as explained in the bible. I'm just looking for the truth.
Todah Rabah Rabbi Tovia Singer!
So out of all the Christian bibles which one would be the most accurate? And what’s a good copy of the Torah for a beginner,Rabbi Singer?
שלום רבי
Rabbi modern English in America when both Great Vowel Shifts are accounted for basically started in 1835 with Horace Mann out of Massachusetts that means it less than 200 years old...
English was never designed for MEANING like ancient languages.
Please continue the fight to teach Proper Meaning & Understanding
“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace”.
6 (5) For unto us a yeled is born, unto us ben is given; and the misrah (dominion) shall be upon his shoulder; and Shmo shall be called Peleh (Wonderful), Yoetz (Counsellor), El Gibbor (Mighty G-d), Avi Ad (Possessor of Eternity), Sar Shalom (Prince of Peace).
7 (6) Of the increase of his misrah and shalom there shall be no ketz (end), upon the Kisse Dovid, and upon his kingdom, to strengthen it, and to support it with mishpat and with tzedakah from henceforth even ad olam (forever). The Kinat Hashem Tzva’os will fulfill this.
There is no way to say Yeshua (Jesus Christ of Nazareth ) is Lord except by the gift of the Holy Spirit.
My hearts desire and prayer is that all Israel will be saved. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.
The idea of the virgin birth has more than one root. The first one is the mistranslation in the Septuagint, which translates "alma" to "parthenos" in Isiah 7:14 and Genesis 24:43. Remember that for Gospel writers the Septuagint was the reference, not Tanakh, because the latter… didn't exist until the Masoretes put it together half a millennium later.
The second root is Greek mythology that originated the idea. Dionysus, Perseus, Jason… all products of virgin birth. Plato himself was rumoured to have been born by a virgin, Perictione. So, a virgin birth signalled the arrival of a special child, a demigod, a distinguished philosopher, a deity even.
Brilliant explanation. Well executed Rabbi
Rabbi Singer, I usually listen to something from you every day. Your programs always make me laugh - worlds best antidepressant. You also speak the truth, which is rare among the missionaries. A year ago I walked out of the Catholic Church. I caught my confessor in a lie while he tried to justify the child abuse of one of our Bishops. There is so much twisting of scripture and farfetched logic going on that they can easily justify lying to people and honestly can't see any problem with it. They actually think their Catholic Church is the last bastion of morality. Delusional! 😂❤
"Jesus, prove to us u r the SON of GOD or that u can do MIRACLES, we want to see, oh u can't because u r a FRAUD!!! GET THE CROSS!!!"
Where can I watch this live broadcast?
Tanak talk @tenaktalk
24:43 The name "Maher-shalal-hash-baz" is a symbolic name given to a son of the prophet Isaiah. It is derived from four Hebrew words: mahēr (quickly), shalal (spoil), ḥash (hurry), and baz (plunder). The name means "Speed-spoil-hasten-plunder" or "Swift is the booty, speedy is the prey" (Isaiah 8:1-4)134. It was used as a prophecy to signify the swift conquest of Damascus and Samaria by the Assyrians, indicating a shift in power and a warning of impending judgment.
Your claim about the septuagint is highly disingenuous. The Isaiah translation was still written BCE. The original Torah translation was written middle of 3rd century BCE with the rest of it, certainly the prophets in 2nd century BCE. And the point of referring to the septuagint for Is 7:14 isnt a distraction from the Hebrew text. It shows what the Jewish scholars before Yeshua's birth thought the passage meant. By writing in Parthenos, which doesnt always mean virgin but nominally does, they show this os what they thought it to mean.
What is your evidence that the Isaiah translation, which used the word parthenos, was written BCE?
@ToviaSinger1 scholars of the topic I found unanimously believe that the version we have now is faithful to the original to the point there's no question to it. So you would have to provide evidence that the word wasn't Parthenos.
I'll nontheless provide evidence since it can be reasonable to challenge things we think are obvious.
Emanuel Tov, a non-Christian Jewish scholar from 'Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible':
The translation of the books of the Prophets, Hagiographa, and apocryphal books came after that of the Torah, for most of these translations use its vocabulary, and quotations from the translation of the Torah appear in the Greek translations of the Latter Prophets, Psalms, Ben Sira, etc. Since the Prophets and several of the books of the Hagiographa were known in their Greek version to the grandson of Ben Sira at the end of the second century BCE, we may infer that most of the books of the Prophets and Hagiographa were translated in the beginning of [the second century BCE] or somewhat earlier...
[p.137]
Here he speaks to the timeline of the authorship of the 'Prophets' portion of the septuagint.
b. The Background of the Revisions
Various factors were instrumental in the creation of the revisions:
(1) Differences between [Septuagint] and the Hebrew text. The Greek-speaking
Jews required a Greek translation that would faithfully reflect the
Hebrew Bible, for their religious needs and, at a later stage, also for the
purpose of their polemics with the Christians. Since the Hebrew text
had changed in the course of the years, the need was felt to adapt to
the Hebrew text that was current in Judaism from the first century BCE
until the second century CE
(2) The abandonment of [Septuagint]. The first Christians- quite naturally chose [Septuagint]
as their Holy Writ and as the source for additional writings since Greek was their language. As a result,
[Septuagint] influenced them not only by the content of the translation in general, but also by its terminology. The
frequent use of [Septuagint] by the Christians caused the Jews to dissociate
themselves from it and to initiate new translations. In light of this, one
should view the criticisms against [Septuagint] in Sof. 1.7: "It happened once that
five elders wrote the Torah for King Ptolemy in Greek, and that day
was as ominous for Israel as the day on which the golden calf was
made, since the Torah could not be accurately translated.'
[p.143-144]
Here he speaks of the Revisions of the Septuagint that would later come. Namely Jewish translations that they believed were more faithful.
He would go on to cite examples. Such as Theodotion and Aquilas. Both of whom use 'neanis' as translation for 'alma'.
From Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Volume I: Books 1-5
Hear also, word for word, what he writes about the interpretation of the inspired Scriptures according to the Septuagint. “So God became man and the Lord himself saved us, giving us the sign of the virgin, but not as some say, who at the present time venture to translate the Scriptures,‘behold a young woman shall conceive and bear a son,’ as Theodotion the Ephesian translated it and Aquila from Pontus, both of them Jewish proselytes, whom the Ebionites follow and aver that he was begotten by Joseph.”
[p.459]
We see here in 3rd Century CE Eusebius makes the distinction that the septuagint\Isaiah translation was originally written with Parthenos\Virgin while Aquila and Theodotion translated it as Neanis\Young woman. Page 458 has the Greek.
So we have a pretty widespread attestation of the Isaiah portion of septuagint which was written 2nd century BCE to have used Parthenos in 7:14.
@ToviaSinger1 scholars of the topic I found unanimously believe that the version we have now is faithful to the original to the point there's no question to it. So you would have to provide evidence that the word wasn't Parthenos.
I'll nontheless provide evidence since it can be reasonable to challenge things we think are obvious.
Emanuel Tov, a non-Christian Jewish scholar from 'Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible':
The translation of the books of the Prophets, Hagiographa, and apocryphal books came after that of the Torah, for most of these translations use its vocabulary, and quotations from the translation of the Torah appear in the Greek translations of the Latter Prophets, Psalms, Ben Sira, etc. Since the Prophets and several of the books of the Hagiographa were known in their Greek version to the grandson of Ben Sira at the end of the second century BCE, we may infer that most of the books of the Prophets and Hagiographa were translated in the beginning of [the second century BCE] or somewhat earlier...
[p.137]
Here he speaks to the timeline of the authorship of the 'Prophets' portion of the septuagint.
b. The Background of the Revisions
Various factors were instrumental in the creation of the revisions:
(1) Differences between [Septuagint] and the Hebrew text. The Greek-speaking
Jews required a Greek translation that would faithfully reflect the
Hebrew Bible, for their religious needs and, at a later stage, also for the
purpose of their polemics with the Christians. Since the Hebrew text
had changed in the course of the years, the need was felt to adapt to
the Hebrew text that was current in Judaism from the first century BCE
until the second century CE
(2) The abandonment of [Septuagint]. The first Christians- quite naturally chose [Septuagint]
as their Holy Writ and as the source for additional writings since Greek was their language. As a result,
[Septuagint] influenced them not only by the content of the translation in general, but also by its terminology. The
frequent use of [Septuagint] by the Christians caused the Jews to dissociate
themselves from it and to initiate new translations. In light of this, one
should view the criticisms against [Septuagint] in Sof. 1.7: "It happened once that
five elders wrote the Torah for King Ptolemy in Greek, and that day
was as ominous for Israel as the day on which the golden calf was
made, since the Torah could not be accurately translated.'
[p.143-144]
Here he speaks of the Revisions of the Septuagint that would later come. Namely Jewish translations that they believed were more faithful.
He would go on to cite examples. Such as Theodotion and Aquilas. Both of whom use 'neanis' as translation for 'alma'.
From Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Volume I: Books 1-5
Hear also, word for word, what he writes about the interpretation of the inspired Scriptures according to the Septuagint. “So God became man and the Lord himself saved us, giving us the sign of the virgin, but not as some say, who at the present time venture to translate the Scriptures,‘behold a young woman shall conceive and bear a son,’ as Theodotion the Ephesian translated it and Aquila from Pontus, both of them Jewish proselytes, whom the Ebionites follow and aver that he was begotten by Joseph.”
[p.459]
We see here in 3rd Century CE Eusebius makes the distinction that the septuagint\Isaiah translation was originally written with Parthenos\Virgin while Aquila and Theodotion translated it as Neanis\Young woman. Page 458 has the Greek.
So we have a pretty widespread attestation of the Isaiah portion of septuagint which was written 2nd century BCE to have used Parthenos in 7:14.
The question then becomes, if Mary did not supernaturally conceive, who impregnated her?
The question doesn't become that. The claim is that the virgin birth of Mary is prophesized in the Hebrew bible. If that claim is proven to be false, it doesn't then beget the question "who impregnated Mary", because the claim was never "Mary didn't give birth as a virgin", the claim was that "the virgin birth is prophesized in the Hebrew Bible". The only conclusion is that the claim is false.
Please, exercise better logic.
Also, before this goes over your head. Where did you study and what did you study. If it isn't top 50 global, and isn't in math, science, engineering, or medicine, I will ignore your response.
@@SakibRahman-cj3dc I perceive that English is not your first (native) language. For I did not ask, “Mary did not supernaturally conceive. So, who impregnated her?” Rather, I asked, *”If* Mary did not supernaturally conceive, then *who* impregnated her?” The question does not imply by necessity that Mary did not supernaturally conceive, but poses a challenge to anyone who would assume (as you believe I had done) that Mary’s conception was natural rather than supernatural. This is an open challenge to you and to anyone pondering the reality of Mary’s conception of Jesus. If not God, then who? Name him, be it Joseph or Panthera or whoever. Otherwise, withhold your scolding.
Your combative response proves that you are impetuous and irrational in your reasoning.
Regarding the Butter and Honey it reminds me of the Song about Chaiim Rumkowski, is a mentsh A gitter, Men vet noch essen in die getto ZEMALACH MIT PITTER.
Imagine if Jay Smith meets Tovia Singer
this is type of truth that will make you drop your lies and surrender😂.
I like how the subtitles say septu agent! :)
In the middle east child bearing age is younger than in northern Europe. Furthermore, we have read about Ben Pandira and Ben Stada etc. The word BETULAH is virgin, even in Greek there is a separate word for Alma and Betulah.
Dear Rabbi, it is true the word used in Isaiah 7: 14 is "ha-almah", the damsel, the young woman, or the maid. My question is, was there any young woman in Israel in those days who was not a virgin? In the Gospel of Matthew Miriam asked the angel how it could be since she had not known a man (Luke 1:34). She was surely a virgin.
he will neglect your comment and go make an other one , blaming that he is being attacked 😂 😢
Did you not watch the video?
He explained the meaning of "Alma/Elem/Alumim" (all versions of the same word) as referring to youth and not sexual status.
There is a perfectly good word in Hebrew for "virgin" ("betula" - used every time throughout the Bible when referring to a virgin).
Not all young women are virgins and not all virgins are young women - they're just not the same thing.
And yet Christians insist on tying themselves in knots in an attempt to find Jesus somewhere we he simply doesn't exist.
Numbers 31:40(NLT)
and 16,000 virgin girls, of whom 32 were the Lord's share.
Mary was just one of the 32 virgins..
@@JeremyKu No, the Word of God is clear. I read the Bible in Hebrew. Miriam was a virgin.
This is blasphemy. May God save you
מה שלומך רבי?
Rav amar sh who kol bseder
Isaiah 8:8
[8]And he shall pass through Judah; he shall overflow and go over, he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel.
BTW ask ChatGPT please quote specific verses in Torah that go against Christianity (eg false prophets even if does miracles saying commandments no longer apply)
It would have been better for my ex-religion (chistianity) to totally and solemnly forbid TANAKH to have any chance of fooling humanity with their scam forcibly. The only little issue they would have had and that no human could ever succeed is how to destroy Adonai, because even rocks would bring light to their attempt deicide. Thank you Rabbi Tovia.
Tovia is now saying that the SIGN from Hashem is not the young maiden (alma) shall be with child and you shall call His name Immanuel. This is false teaching : Hashem clearly says to Ahaz to ask for a MIRACULOUS SIGN.
THE SIGN OF THE CHILD OF THE YOUNG MAIDEN WOULD BE THE MIRACLE - G-d with us. Hallelujah.
RUclips unsubscribed me from your channel
That has happened to me at times. I have no idea as to why.
Maybe to show you that one can become unsubscribed without ever pressing a button, just like someone giving birth to someone without ever... you know 😅
Chainsaw kid here.
Can someone explain why Isaiah wrote 2 different prophesies 7:14 ,8:3.
The first to highlight that God is with the Southern Kingdom (God is with us), the second is to underscore the destruction of the Northern Kingdom and Syria (quicken the loot, hasten the booty)
@@Jock-kp4kg aside from what Rabbi Singer akready wrote above, there seems to be a difference of opinions about whether this is the same son, or a second son. Either way, the two passagess comprise two messages, like the good Rabbi said...
@@ToviaSinger1 no disrespect, but you can see why Christians don't agree with you.
Absurd?its way much absurd that zeus impregnated danae by way of a “golden shower”….greek thinking as always..as jezeus was impregnated by a spirit..thats way much absurd, missionaries are using “puberty” to describe “alma” what a non sense demonstration😂😂😂😂moreover this missionary claims that it ranges from 12-16..imagine mary gatting pregnant at 12🤣🤣🤣🤣.
My question, Rabbi Tovia, is there anywhere that can indicate, how long was Mary married before she conceived Jesus. I thought back in thoses times, a married couple had to be acromated to become one?
Did Isaiah forget to mention in 7:14 it was his wife.
At 16:00, I'm not sure if it is Satan or the Church that is more responsible for the deception! Might be a tie! God bless!
""THE GREATEST MAN in HISTORY"
had no servants, yet they called Him Master.
Had no degree, yet they called Him Teacher. Had
no medicines, yet they called Him Healer. He
had no army, yet kings feared Him. He won no
military battles, yet He conquered the world. He
did not live in a castle, yet they called Him Lord,
He ruled no nations, yet they called Him King, He
committed no crime, yet they crucified Him. He
was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today!
Brainwashing😂😂😂😂
Idolatry
@@loyisoceza4959
No facts
Jesus is king 👑
And when he comes back he will not be happy with the ones who rejected him
@@DivineJustice-xl1jw Why does he need to "come back"? Did he strike out at his first attempt? There is no idea anywhere in the Hebrew Bible (the only Bible Jewish Jesus ever knew or read) of a second coming - a Christian invention made necessary after Jesus was executed without fulfilling any of the Biblical prophecies about the Messiah.
@@DivineJustice-xl1jw according to the christian story... jesus has come a "second time" when he rose from his grave and walked around jerusalem for 40 days.....
When the Jewish Messiah appears, will he be born of a chaste woman (faithful to her husband) or will he be born of an adultress woman?
She won’t be a virgin!
@@finishstrongdoc what kind of question is that?? He will be born of, and to, a mother and father! The father will be from the House of David!
That looks remarkably similar to our favorite Rabbi!!!😂💦😂💦😂💦
I was born to a christian family , maybe i should of paid more attention to the pre birth checklist ?
The Revised Standard Version & New Revised Standard Version…both of them Christian translations…say young woman in Isaiah 7.14 & not virgin.
You didn't mention this time how useless a sign would be that would only be fulfilled hundreds of years later - and also how pointless to use as a sign something that is unverifiable e.g. conception without a man
There are only two people that were simply created and that was in Genesis. Thereafter God said go forth and repopulate the Earth. Why he said repopulate, probably because there were other types of neanderthal beings that were eliminated when earth became void and desolate, who knows. But going forward, God wanted people to get knocked up, there is no shame. But they say you are dirt because you were not miraculously conceived and hence you need Jesus, when in fact you are created in the image of God. To say otherwise is idolitory and open the door to worship gunigoogoo. God gave the Torah for one reason: if people try to deceive you, just double check what He said.
I'd say bethulah, but I think the missionaries may accuse me of sneezing.
Article 88 - Tanakh (Hebrew Bible)
Canon 6067
The “Tanakh”, also known as the Hebrew Bible is the 16th Century Ancient Greek to Hebrew
translation of the sacred scripture of the 1st Century CE Iudaeism “Lucifer” Cult known as the
Septuaginta and the “G” under the direction of the Venetian Magyar as part of their attempts to unify
and control what is now known as the religion of “Judaism”.
Canon 6068
The claim that the 16th Century translation of the Septuaginta from Ancient Greek into Hebrew is
somehow the “authentic” scriptures of the Sephardi, also known as the Samaritans, also known as
the Manes is a direct curse and absurd insult against the Persian founders of the religion who along
with all other ancient cultures of the world from the 1st Century CE onwards considered the
Septuaginta authored by Flavius Josephus to be the most “unholy” and “blasphemous” work ever
conceived.
Canon 6069
The claim that the Tanakh and Torah must have been worshipped by Sephardi and Samaritans earlier
than the 16th Century as evidenced by the alleged “authentic” books called “targum” meaning
“interpretations” such as the Targum Onkelos and Targum Jonathan ben Uzziel are nothing more than
16th Century frauds as part of the original corruption to create the 16th Century Jerusalem Talmud
and then the Babylonian Talmud corrupted to be virtually unrecognizable from the original in the 17th
Century to deliberately promote Sabbateanism and other cults.
Canon 6070
The claim that the largest, oldest and most expensive program of language fraud in history known as
the “Dead Sea Scrolls” project somehow justifies the existence of the Torah, the Tanakh and Hebrew
is one of the greatest lies in history, whereby hundreds of manuscripts were deliberately torn into tiny
pieces, some were totally destroyed and many tens of thousands of fragments carefully altered to
enable their “reconstruction” to “fit” a fraudulent template.
Canon 6071
The Talmud was completely altered to introduce a new fraudulent section known as the “Halakha”
meaning “pronunciation”, first printed in the 16th Century in Venice and London in order to integrate
the Septuaginta via the 613 public laws, 50 private laws and 3 secret oaths that make up the claimed
“Mosaic Law”.
Canon 6072
Given the Septuaginta are scriptures traditionally dedicated to worshipping the Roman Emperor as
Lucifer Augustus or “Lord God”, while the Talmud was dedicated to worshipping Seytan (Satan) as
Sabaoth, many Rabbi have remained confused since the 17th Century whether they worship Lucifer or
Satan.
Canon 6073
As resistance to the corruptions to traditional Sephardi, Samaritan Talmudic texts continued and the
Tanakh was still not given sufficient standing, the Venetian-Magyars through the Jesuits introduced yet
another sect in the 18th Century known as Hasidic Judaism or “Hasidism”.
Canon 6074
All who worship the Tanakh as true therefore worship the Superior General as Lord God, also known
as Lucifer since the 16th Century.
Canon 6075
Given all versions of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) were designed from the 16th Century onwards for the
purpose of fraud and control by tricking good people into worshipping the Superior General of the
Jesuits as Lord God (Lucifer) and “King of the Jews”, any and all versions of the Tanakh are hereby null
and void from the beginning, having no force or effect spiritually, legally or lawfully.
Canon 6076
All claims of property, position, office, power, ownership based on the legitimacy of “Mosaic Law”
derived from the Hebrew Bible are hereby null and void, having no force or effect of law spiritually,
legally or lawfully
THE GREAT PYRAMID IS TESTAMENT TO THE TRINITY.
No it's not.
@ IN THOSE DAYS SHALL BE AN ALTER TO THE LORD IN THE CENTER OF EARTH THE GREAT PYRAMID OF WHICH THERE ARE 3 CHRISTS ASCENSION AND STORY MAPPED OUT.THE KINGS CHAMBER HAS A GRANITE BOX FITS PERFECTLY THE ARK OF THE COVENANT THAT HAS 3 ITEMS INSIDE.144,000 CASING STONES SAME AS IN REVELATION OUTSIDE THE ALTER A LION GUARDING THE WAY LION OF JUDAH SAME AS IN REVELATION..ANY MATHEMATICS EXPERT WILL TELL YOU IT REPRESENTS THE TRINITY.
Wasn't king David a descendant of Adam? Is the soul of Adam reborn in YesHuah, the father or the son?
Another big L for JCpenny! 😂
If I were a virgin and I became artificially inseminated, does that count since I would’ve never had intercourse?
You make a good argument against the Christian use of Isaiah 7, but how can the sign that the two kings will not prevail against Judah be that the two kings will be desolate? What sort of sign is that! The whole point of the sign is to reassure Ahaz that the two kings WILL not conquer Judah, The sign has to occur BEFORE the two kings are defeated. The sign cannot be the defeat itself.
The sign is the maturity of the child, not the child's birth.
חֶמְאָ֥ה וּדְבַ֖שׁ יֹאכֵ֑ל לְדַעְתּ֛וֹ מָא֥וֹס בָּרָ֖ע וּבָח֥וֹר בַּטּֽוֹב׃
(By the time he learns to reject the bad and choose the good, people will be feeding on curds and honey.)
כִּ֠י בְּטֶ֨רֶם יֵדַ֥ע הַנַּ֛עַר מָאֹ֥ס בָּרָ֖ע וּבָחֹ֣ר בַּטּ֑וֹב תֵּעָזֵ֤ב הָאֲדָמָה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר אַתָּ֣ה קָ֔ץ מִפְּנֵ֖י שְׁנֵ֥י מְלָכֶֽיהָ׃
For before the lad knows to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground whose two kings you dread shall be abandoned.
7:15-16
@@alekssalkinrkc No. The sign is supposed to be that "before the lad knows to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground whose two kings you dread shall be abandoned"
Isaiah 7:11,14
Although, Isaiah does not say virgin it certainly implies a young unmarried girl which in this context would be a virgin.
A sign from Hashem would classify this sign as a miracle in the context of Isaiah 7:11,14.
Therefore, when Hashem says I will give you a SIGN this would imply that a young maiden (usually a unmarried woman) would have a child. The miraculous part is that she would be a virgin as the Jewish Prophet Matthew is revealing the Isaiah prophecy.
Let Hashem teach you and not a man.
Tovia will stand before G-d and give an account for every word he has spoken against Hashem.
Next up… Isaiah 9:6?
Rabbi Singer has many isaiah 9 videos available on this channel.
The sign isn’t the conception? Horrible interpretation. You must say this because a “woman” or “young woman” giving birth wouldn’t be a sign. A virgin giving birth would be a definite sign. This clearly wasn’t fulfilled in Isaiah and his sons.