Thanks to G2A for sponsoring this video, check the spring sale out here: www.g2a.com/spring-sale ___Corrections___ 6:46: The Kar98K shown here does actually eject spent rounds, this inaccuracy seems to only applied to certain other bolt action rifles in the game. 45:55 The Mosin Nagant in game appears to be actually be modelled on the M38 Carbine version which were primarily given to guncrews and non frontline combatants, it should be the standard issue M91/30 Mosin Nagant that we originally mistook it for instead. If you have any questions, corrections, or extra inaccuracies then please let us know in the comments! This video was a massive collaborate effort and would not have been possible without the critical research aid from FeReinsm, K-nyne, Davidson, Munancho inc, pollock_madlad and the supportive community in my discord group, along with several other sources. Massive thanks to everyone involved and to you for watching!
I have to mention that the US mission where you rescue Price and Ingram happened 2 years after Kommandobefehl (Commando Order) was issued, where it states that any and all Allied commandos who are captured would be summarily executed, even if properly uniformed or attempting to surrender. And if caught in enemy uniforms, they would be handed over to SD and executed, if they weren't killed in battle beforehand. So by the time the 101 Airborne starts their missions, Price and Ingram would be long dead
This game represents "Less is More" to me. I love it more than the ones with ultrarealistic details, over the top skins, microtransactions and broken promises.
Also represents the times, as all of what you said weren't even a thing yet. I at least want to return to the time of finished, working products that need at most a few patches through it's life. I just remembered Tropico, which worked at launch, but it had/has a patch you can install with some fixes and adjustments as well as extra content.
Speaking of Medal of Honor, it would be nice for you to one day cover Airborne and Pacific Assault. It’s more fun knowing Pacific Assault likely got the Makin Atoll Raid more accurate than the one in World at War.
They'd have trouble finding many things wrong with Pacific Assault, it's the most accurate game of either Medal Of Honor Or Call Of Duty as franchises.
This is by far my favorite COD campaign. It's got good variety, healthpacks, the 3 nation setup, big battles, clandestine operations, a micheal giacchino score, and it's not too scripted to have bad replay value.
One more thing. U.S. Paratroopers in Normandy had camo canopy parachutes, not white, like depicted in media, even Brothers in Arms gets this detail wrong.
@@K-Nyne To be fair..Band of Brothers is still based on a book by someone who could not even really be bothered to do proper research himself..like checking casualty lists or service records
50:00 the ammo pouch in the upper left is a soviet Kirza pattern pouch, these were not made until the mid 1950s. and the moist on the table is actually a Finnish one, you can tell by its rear sight
Inaccuracies aside, it's the only WW2 game where you're fighting both the axis and "allied" Soldiers which makes it really interesting. The German thought you're a soviet, and the Soviets thought you're a German sniper.
45:32 it is worth noting that Repnikov's house was much further away from the square of the fallen fighters, a few dozens meters behind the train station, which itself was about 2 blocks away from the square.
The Jericho trumpets on the Stukas are either for gameplay purposes so you would notice them coming in for attack or a misconception in that they always make that sound by design and not via an add-on part
Would you consider doing a mini-video on inaccuracies in Beach Invasion 1944 & Beach Invasion 1945? They’re very small indie games so it would probably be like a 10 minute video at most. Would love to see them get attention though!
@@zolfilegend I have just minded a detail, in Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway, the US troops wore green uniforms, I was wondering are those accurated or not
Hey Frosty 1 I was hoping you would make an inaccuracies episode for this cod. As pretty usual a very entertaining video, always looking forward to see your content. Keep it up bro 😁😁😁
Have you considered doing this with the Brothers in Arms series? It’s one of my all time favorite WW2 game series, and think it would be interesting to take a look at?
Hey Frosty! Another thing to Note about the "Panzergrenadiers": They appear to be wearing to "Schlupfhemd" style Camo to be worn over the fieldblouse, but the Fieldblouse itself is missing. The shirt they are wearing is the Field Undershirt, which would not even hold the obviously missing collar tabs.
13:26 this is a model panzerfaust 60. this pattern didn't enter use with the German Army unitl around September 1944. It should be either the Panzerfaust 30 K or G (klein or groß)
I'm kind of wondering when you're going to make a inaccuracy series on the Medal of Honor games. As I remember a lot from the old medal of Honor games, especially medal of Honor rising sun, you saw Marines using m1 rifles during the Battle of the philippines, and as well even not even wearing historical uniforms at that point. And that's not only to mention the other accounts of other things they got wrong in various other games. Plus as well if you take a look at Medal of Honor frontline, or as well Medal of honor European assault you do see a few variations of inaccuracies here and there as well.
Would be cool to see more of these "older" games like Brothers in Arms, Sniper Elite: Berlin and even the Delta Force series. Also, great game despite it's inaccuracies. Probably one of the best WW2 games out there, not THE best, but obviously up there. Fun fact, internally this was named "The Medal of Honor killer" Also yeah the fact that you don't secure Carentan or hill 30 is criminal.
I love these. People call this sort of stuff nitpicky but it’s educational and when you have as much impact in the world as cod does, every inaccuracy does pile up.
I recommend a mod for this game: Call of Duty United Fronts. Not only does it expand the game and combined COD and COD:UO, but it also fixes a lot of the historical problems you listed
I wouldn't say "a lot", it fixes like maybe 5 of the inaccuracies in this video. It doesn't go as far as the WaW mods. But this video will still be a helpful guide, to know what should be changed.
Gonna be honest I think WW2 offends me more than Vanguard Vanguard was obviously made as an expansion to Warzone, so all the wacky cosmetics and bullshit attachments make sense, and i honestly think it would be way better if they just went all B-movie rag tag team of soldiers like an 60s movie with Nazi conspiracies, they flirted with the idea but never committed WW2 has no excuses, is just an copy of Band of brothers and downplays the concentration camps so much, like, they downplay the holocaust to say it was used on American pows and like Yeah they were but I am sure concentration camps were famous for an whole other reason They simply don't mention the holocaust or it's victims despite having an concentration camp
@@jordandino417 I think when people say "historically accurate," they probably mean "historically authentic." As in, it feels like the setting its portraying.
You missed some. Correct me if I'm wrong. - During battle of the buldge, Martin didn't wear proper uniform. He still wore the same uniform from D-Day, despite multiplayer mode has the proper uniform. Same thing can be said for Sgt.Evans during V2 rocket mission. He still wore Airborne uniform despite already joined SAS. - The snipers section of Pavlov House mission have normal Kar98ks with no bolt animation and don't share ammo with regular ones. - Pvt. Elder was training with 101st despite being the 82nd. It would make more sense if he was 101st.
We mention our character still wears the M42 in Recogne. We also mention the snipers not sharing ammo as a whole. We also mention 82nd troops training with us
Would be interesting seeing a vid on CoD 3. It was very rushed and came out between 2 amazing CoD games (CoD 2 and CoD world at war) and made some pretty big fixes from CoD 2 but idk how easy it would be getting your hands on it
*Finally, Frosty the First delivering us with more Historical Accurate Content* The Moral of this video: When making a game themed around WW2, films like Enemy at the Gates are not historical sources.
50:50 I was always perplexed by the decision to arm the Soviets with P08's. Even considering technical limitations preventing the inclusion of another pistol, the 1911 from the other Allied campaigns would make more sense. The low poly world model for the 1911 could stand in for a TT33 in the hands of NPCs thanks to the pistols shared heritage. Not to mention the many 1911s supplied to the soviets by the US as lend lease justifying some being present. If they just really wanted to give the player a captured German pistol, I think that's fine. But, every Soviet officer having a Luger? Feels wrong
Playing this game feels really cathartic once you realize how large the franchise has become since then. Before No Russian, The Numbers, and WW3, it all started as a simple WW2 game made to honor the soldiers who fought for our country while also being a fun game as well.
You know i would like to see an Sniper Elite Historical Inaccuracy saga videos i think it would be intriguin to see how many inaccuracies can get that game saga.. anyhow another godly video from Frosty 1, learning more than what i actually know is always great.
I noticed it the first time I played through the game. I remember playing this game, and obsessing so much over keeping every friendly NPC alive. I tried to do that with Price, but as it turns out, he's just scripted to die there.
Same, Although there were limitations they did a brilliant job of portraying wars especially back in the golden age of gaming that being the 2000s-2010s
inaccruacies in first call of duty game: wrong unit takes out the guns at brecourt manor and the manor itself to show both events in one mission in order to save game space and calculating power. some weapons appear earlier than they should camos are wrong inaccruacies in modern call of duty: one woman alone inspires russians to fight harder for stalingrad, weapons that either never saw combat or were produced in quantity that didn't go above 100 units are scattered all over the place, weapons have idiotic never existing attachments, wrong units wearing wrong camos and japanese soldiers speaking english asking player if he speaks japanese... the difference? real COD games despite inanccruacies treated their setting with respect while modern cods just use it for complete bullshit that no matter how hard it tries can never pass as serious
I just realized that you talked a little bit about the multiplayer maps in this video. This has made me realize that it could be quite interesting to see you do a breakdown of each games multiplayers. You could do a section breaking down the maps based on real locations, then the realism of the maps that are historical fiction, before finally breaking down every other aspect of the multiplayer (Such as weapons and their attachments, kill-streaks, and historically inspired cosmetics). I think when it comes to blatantly incorrect cosmetics like Bozo The Clown and the like you should just add one point for each of them. Then when it comes to uniforms that are inaccurate, but based on real uniforms, you can break down each aspect that is wrong. Finally, historically inspired uniforms can be broken down fully. I wouldn't expect all of these videos to be the same length as the campaign videos but I still think they'd be interesting nonetheless. Especially once you get into games with wackier kill-streaks like Black Ops. Not all of them could be done this way, but I think that myself and others would still be interested in seeing the multiplayers broken down in the same way as the campaign.
Really nice. Do you think you'll ever look into Call of Duty 2: Big Red One? Apparently, it seems to have the most historical accuracy, especially since the devs got a lot of input from the actual veterans of BRO.
2003 Call of Duty. Honestly, more accurate than Vanguard, not like that is difficult. Even with the, understandable due to technical limitations, inaccuracies, this game is still pretty good on being accurate. I certainly liked this game. Of course then there's the Soviet campaign which starts off with Enemy at the Gates the playable movie. That can be excused as CoD loves doing this kind of stuff for dramatic and intense moments. (Edit to correct for wrong year listed)
I really like that you acknowledged that a lot of these decisions are so because of ease of development or hardware limitations, and I'm doubly glad you'll keep pointing them out nonetheless. Great video as usual!
@@spencersecrest6001 Besides,during the Cold War,both the Soviet Union and the West crack down on innocent protestors and supported authoritarian regimes throughout the world.Neither side were any better than the other.
Its nice to see TIK getting some recognition for his stalingrad series...by the way maybe you could take a look at earliest ww2 RTS games sudden strike series? And cod 1despite its flaws is really a very entertaining game that gets the setting correctly
After watching your series on historical inaccuracies, do you think there is a possibility of seeing this for the "Medal of Honor" series? I aware most, if not all (D-Day), missions are fictional, but I saw documentaries of the developers from the old games and the newest VR one, making in-depth research on the aesthetics, looks and locations rather than actual real operations done during WW2.
It's amazing that, despite being so inaccurate, the movie Enemy at the Gates inspired Call of duty so much. Might be inaccurate, but nowhere near Vanguard-level disrespectful.
Has anyone played this game when it was new back in 02' or 03' including expansion pack united offensive like me? Admit it when this was new back then alot was blown away by its concept of alot of allied soldiers fighting along the player which topples the medal of honor gameplay.
You know newer CODs and Battlefields are bad when their historical inaccuracies videos are 30 minutes longer despite not even having half as much campaign
I just finshed a playthoghe of this great game and was thinking about your channle as i was playing i knew it was a matter of time for you to get to cod 1
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks to G2A for sponsoring this video, check the spring sale out here: www.g2a.com/spring-sale
___Corrections___
6:46: The Kar98K shown here does actually eject spent rounds, this inaccuracy seems to only applied to certain other bolt action rifles in the game.
45:55 The Mosin Nagant in game appears to be actually be modelled on the M38 Carbine version which were primarily given to guncrews and non frontline combatants, it should be the standard issue M91/30 Mosin Nagant that we originally mistook it for instead.
If you have any questions, corrections, or extra inaccuracies then please let us know in the comments!
This video was a massive collaborate effort and would not have been possible without the critical research aid from FeReinsm, K-nyne, Davidson, Munancho inc, pollock_madlad and the supportive community in my discord group, along with several other sources. Massive thanks to everyone involved and to you for watching!
Love your vids frosty!
Will you make more videos of the OG CoDs?
Nice work @TheFrosty_1 good jobb
@@Zoomer_Boi me too
You forgot that the Soviet flag was placed in the Reichstag at night time. In your world at war video, you talked about it.
this is becoming my new favourite series
Same, I can’t wait for frosty to do COD 3 next.
Same as long as he doesn’t pad the numbers with guns or technical errors.
79th also yup
i hope he dose its interesting@@DarkPsychoMessiah
@@gew43no its not unless you’re autistic
Time to learn everything about World War 2 again.
I have a playlist about it, but…it has Call of Duty games.
Yuh
Yes
I have to mention that the US mission where you rescue Price and Ingram happened 2 years after Kommandobefehl (Commando Order) was issued, where it states that any and all Allied commandos who are captured would be summarily executed, even if properly uniformed or attempting to surrender. And if caught in enemy uniforms, they would be handed over to SD and executed, if they weren't killed in battle beforehand.
So by the time the 101 Airborne starts their missions, Price and Ingram would be long dead
Good point, thanks for the input
Very interesting
This game represents "Less is More" to me. I love it more than the ones with ultrarealistic details, over the top skins, microtransactions and broken promises.
Also represents the times, as all of what you said weren't even a thing yet. I at least want to return to the time of finished, working products that need at most a few patches through it's life. I just remembered Tropico, which worked at launch, but it had/has a patch you can install with some fixes and adjustments as well as extra content.
Hey fellow Thomas fan
Good evening.
@@tomyoldiron6715 You too man
“Less is more boys thats my advice more survival knife you survival wife.”
-John mcclane from ERB
Speaking of Medal of Honor, it would be nice for you to one day cover Airborne and Pacific Assault. It’s more fun knowing Pacific Assault likely got the Makin Atoll Raid more accurate than the one in World at War.
Pacific and Allied assault NEED console ports.
@@cadjebushey6524 different era
they got rising sun and frontlines
They'd have trouble finding many things wrong with Pacific Assault, it's the most accurate game of either Medal Of Honor Or Call Of Duty as franchises.
@@cadjebushey6524OORAH!!! Absolutely!!!! 👍👍👍
i cant wait for a MOH Airborne or MOH pacific assault video !!
i wonder if @TheFrosty_1 would ever do the modern takes on MOH games
Imagine fighting desperately in Warsaw to regroup with the 4th army only to realise that they're chilling in Iran
This is by far my favorite COD campaign. It's got good variety, healthpacks, the 3 nation setup, big battles, clandestine operations, a micheal giacchino score, and it's not too scripted to have bad replay value.
Never played this campaign (although I would love to at some point), but you can never go wrong with good ol' Michael Giacchino.
One more thing. U.S. Paratroopers in Normandy had camo canopy parachutes, not white, like depicted in media, even Brothers in Arms gets this detail wrong.
Band of Brothers gets alot wrong. Really isn't as accurate as people always think it is
@@K-Nyne The game Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 and Earned in Blood.
@@jerbs5346 oh I'm sorry I read it wrong. My answer still stands though :p
@@K-Nyne I agreed, too. I just didn't want to be lectured.
@@K-Nyne To be fair..Band of Brothers is still based on a book by someone who could not even really be bothered to do proper research himself..like checking casualty lists or service records
34:14 RIP Captain Price :(
I'l see you in hell captain Price
Don't worry he responded in MW
By shooting back?
@@gooseegg617 Goodbye Captain Price
@@gooseegg617 That's actually the great granchild of world war 2 Price.
50:00 the ammo pouch in the upper left is a soviet Kirza pattern pouch, these were not made until the mid 1950s.
and the moist on the table is actually a Finnish one, you can tell by its rear sight
Would love to see historical inaccuracies in sniper elite games
He have to get throat surgery after that video 😂
Inaccuracies aside, it's the only WW2 game where you're fighting both the axis and "allied" Soldiers which makes it really interesting. The German thought you're a soviet, and the Soviets thought you're a German sniper.
I'm talking about V2
45:32 it is worth noting that Repnikov's house was much further away from the square of the fallen fighters, a few dozens meters behind the train station, which itself was about 2 blocks away from the square.
The Jericho trumpets on the Stukas are either for gameplay purposes so you would notice them coming in for attack or a misconception in that they always make that sound by design and not via an add-on part
Or just rule of cool.
Dont forget about expansion called united offensive and medal of honor allied assault
Ah good times.
Don't worry, they're on the list
I hope he does CoD2 Big Red One, forgotten but underrated game
And finest hour
He already did united offensive, I hope he does allied assault
29:49: I wasn't aware that Jason Statham had done voiceover for this game.
When celebrity appearances in CoD were not fucking stupid :)
@@K-Nyne To be fair, Jason wasn't the household name he is now when the first Call of Duty was made.
Please make a "Every historical Inaccuracy in Medal of Honor" series
Agreed
I really wanna see the Pacific Assault and Airborne inaccuracies so badly
Amazing video and I love your content
Thank you, for both the kind words and for supporting the channel!
@@TheFrosty_1Can you cover movies too or just games? If you do another game, can you do Delta Force Black Hawk Down. Both PC and PS2 versions?
DF BHD game? lmao that stuff has nearly nothing to point@@toby1439
thank you so, so much for removing the preview at the start of the video recently lol. Thats one of my biggest pet peeves with modern youtube
Still, to this day, my absolute favorite call of duty. No contest
Would you consider doing a mini-video on inaccuracies in Beach Invasion 1944 & Beach Invasion 1945? They’re very small indie games so it would probably be like a 10 minute video at most. Would love to see them get attention though!
Love these videos, i hope one of these days he goes to the brothers in arms series
The United Fronts mod sorta fixed some of these, in training for example, the 30 cal is used instead of the MG42 when crawling under the barb wire.
Its really good to make an inaccuracy video of brothers in arms.
I think it's gonna be a youtube short
@@TheGreenB1rdwhy?
@@zolfilegend It has very few inaccuracies I believe so
@@TheGreenB1rd yeah i believe too...
@@zolfilegend I have just minded a detail, in Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway, the US troops wore green uniforms, I was wondering are those accurated or not
*Sees the AA patch.* " Oh, the athletic alcoholics. "
Hey Frosty 1 I was hoping you would make an inaccuracies episode for this cod. As pretty usual a very entertaining video, always looking forward to see your content. Keep it up bro 😁😁😁
thank you, i was waiting for vid about legendary cod 1
Have you considered doing this with the Brothers in Arms series? It’s one of my all time favorite WW2 game series, and think it would be interesting to take a look at?
Yes we have
Hey Frosty!
Another thing to Note about the "Panzergrenadiers":
They appear to be wearing to "Schlupfhemd" style Camo to be worn over the fieldblouse, but the Fieldblouse itself is missing.
The shirt they are wearing is the Field Undershirt, which would not even hold the obviously missing collar tabs.
13:26 this is a model panzerfaust 60.
this pattern didn't enter use with the German Army unitl around September 1944.
It should be either the Panzerfaust 30 K or G (klein or groß)
YAY, the history defender is back!!!!
One historical inaccuracy is that kids say this game is bad.
I'm kind of wondering when you're going to make a inaccuracy series on the Medal of Honor games. As I remember a lot from the old medal of Honor games, especially medal of Honor rising sun, you saw Marines using m1 rifles during the Battle of the philippines, and as well even not even wearing historical uniforms at that point. And that's not only to mention the other accounts of other things they got wrong in various other games. Plus as well if you take a look at Medal of Honor frontline, or as well Medal of honor European assault you do see a few variations of inaccuracies here and there as well.
Would be cool to see more of these "older" games like Brothers in Arms, Sniper Elite: Berlin and even the Delta Force series.
Also, great game despite it's inaccuracies. Probably one of the best WW2 games out there, not THE best, but obviously up there. Fun fact, internally this was named "The Medal of Honor killer"
Also yeah the fact that you don't secure Carentan or hill 30 is criminal.
I love these. People call this sort of stuff nitpicky but it’s educational and when you have as much impact in the world as cod does, every inaccuracy does pile up.
Spoiler Alert Germany Loses 😂
No you ruined the ending for me lol
*Sad German noises*
Noooo! I was still on the season 1: 1939 😢
@@fortunateghost7438BLITZ-KRIEG Season 1
Oh, FLICKST DICH! I barely started the darn vid!
I recommend a mod for this game: Call of Duty United Fronts. Not only does it expand the game and combined COD and COD:UO, but it also fixes a lot of the historical problems you listed
I wouldn't say "a lot", it fixes like maybe 5 of the inaccuracies in this video. It doesn't go as far as the WaW mods. But this video will still be a helpful guide, to know what should be changed.
I think quality wise Back to Fronts for CoD2 is better. United Fronts had so many new rifle models with mismatched texture quality.
United Fronts maybe fixed some stuff, but added these boring recycled levels with terrible level design
Still more historically accurate than WWII and Vanguard
But it still shows that COD was never historically accurate to begin with.
No game is, that's the point of this video series. But at least this one shows respect for history
Gonna be honest I think WW2 offends me more than Vanguard
Vanguard was obviously made as an expansion to Warzone, so all the wacky cosmetics and bullshit attachments make sense, and i honestly think it would be way better if they just went all B-movie rag tag team of soldiers like an 60s movie with Nazi conspiracies, they flirted with the idea but never committed
WW2 has no excuses, is just an copy of Band of brothers and downplays the concentration camps so much, like, they downplay the holocaust to say it was used on American pows and like
Yeah they were but I am sure concentration camps were famous for an whole other reason
They simply don't mention the holocaust or it's victims despite having an concentration camp
@@jordandino417 I think when people say "historically accurate," they probably mean "historically authentic." As in, it feels like the setting its portraying.
@@K-NyneNot too much in the soviet campaign :b
Something I wanted and finally new video
i cant believe that i watched the whole ved tell the finish really well made u earn a new subscriber
You missed some. Correct me if I'm wrong.
- During battle of the buldge, Martin didn't wear proper uniform. He still wore the same uniform from D-Day, despite multiplayer mode has the proper uniform. Same thing can be said for Sgt.Evans during V2 rocket mission. He still wore Airborne uniform despite already joined SAS.
- The snipers section of Pavlov House mission have normal Kar98ks with no bolt animation and don't share ammo with regular ones.
- Pvt. Elder was training with 101st despite being the 82nd. It would make more sense if he was 101st.
We mention our character still wears the M42 in Recogne. We also mention the snipers not sharing ammo as a whole. We also mention 82nd troops training with us
@@K-Nyne Thanks for correcting me. But I just noticed another: In Brecourt Manor mission, Sgt.Moody commanded 2 LT. despite being a Sgt.
god bless i was just about to eat food LOL love these videos bro keep up the great work
you should do brothers in arms! one of the most accurate ww2 game franchise ever
Would be interesting seeing a vid on CoD 3. It was very rushed and came out between 2 amazing CoD games (CoD 2 and CoD world at war) and made some pretty big fixes from CoD 2 but idk how easy it would be getting your hands on it
Happy Easter Sunday Everyone ❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Happy Easter! 🐣 ❤
4:40 wow, CoD is so accurate it even has american disregard to local names. fantastic
Pls, we need a Brothers in Arms historical review
I guess that will be a short video lol
It's on the list, and spoiler: it won't be short
hell yeah, I was waiting for this
Hello, This was a pretty good video. Could you do one for the soviet campain of Company of Heroes 2?
*Finally, Frosty the First delivering us with more Historical Accurate Content*
The Moral of this video: When making a game themed around WW2, films like Enemy at the Gates are not historical sources.
Ok stalaboo
50:50 I was always perplexed by the decision to arm the Soviets with P08's. Even considering technical limitations preventing the inclusion of another pistol, the 1911 from the other Allied campaigns would make more sense. The low poly world model for the 1911 could stand in for a TT33 in the hands of NPCs thanks to the pistols shared heritage. Not to mention the many 1911s supplied to the soviets by the US as lend lease justifying some being present. If they just really wanted to give the player a captured German pistol, I think that's fine. But, every Soviet officer having a Luger? Feels wrong
The funny thing is that in the united offensive expansion, they finally added a TT-33 yet all the soviet officers still somehow use the P08
The fact that an older game like Call of Duty still somehow got less inaccuracies than Battlefield V says a lot
Playing this game feels really cathartic once you realize how large the franchise has become since then. Before No Russian, The Numbers, and WW3, it all started as a simple WW2 game made to honor the soldiers who fought for our country while also being a fun game as well.
You know i would like to see an Sniper Elite Historical Inaccuracy saga videos i think it would be intriguin to see how many inaccuracies can get that game saga.. anyhow another godly video from Frosty 1, learning more than what i actually know is always great.
This is the first time I've seen Price's corpse in the game. Although,the last time I have played CoD1 was like in 2005...19 years ago...
I noticed it the first time I played through the game. I remember playing this game, and obsessing so much over keeping every friendly NPC alive. I tried to do that with Price, but as it turns out, he's just scripted to die there.
34:17 my reaction to all inaccuracy in this game
Still one of the best Call of Duty games.
Even with lots of innacuracies, this game made me fall in love with history of WW2 and WW1
Yep, considering later CODs still had over 100 innacuracies, these for 2003 is quite impressive tbh.
Same, Although there were limitations they did a brilliant job of portraying wars especially back in the golden age of gaming that being the 2000s-2010s
inaccruacies in first call of duty game:
wrong unit takes out the guns at brecourt manor and the manor itself to show both events in one mission in order to save game space and calculating power.
some weapons appear earlier than they should
camos are wrong
inaccruacies in modern call of duty:
one woman alone inspires russians to fight harder for stalingrad, weapons that either never saw combat or were produced in quantity that didn't go above 100 units are scattered all over the place, weapons have idiotic never existing attachments, wrong units wearing wrong camos and japanese soldiers speaking english asking player if he speaks japanese...
the difference? real COD games despite inanccruacies treated their setting with respect
while modern cods just use it for complete bullshit that no matter how hard it tries can never pass as serious
The Thompson is an open bolt smg, the bolt would slam shut, after firing the last round. Those mags didn't have a bolt hold open
I stand corrected, as per Forgotten Weapons, the M1A1 Thompsons had a bolt hold open
Love this video I hope we get more I'd love to see one of the expansion of this one and for big red one
It's 5 am and I'm eating breakfast, you posted just in time!
I just realized that you talked a little bit about the multiplayer maps in this video. This has made me realize that it could be quite interesting to see you do a breakdown of each games multiplayers. You could do a section breaking down the maps based on real locations, then the realism of the maps that are historical fiction, before finally breaking down every other aspect of the multiplayer (Such as weapons and their attachments, kill-streaks, and historically inspired cosmetics).
I think when it comes to blatantly incorrect cosmetics like Bozo The Clown and the like you should just add one point for each of them. Then when it comes to uniforms that are inaccurate, but based on real uniforms, you can break down each aspect that is wrong. Finally, historically inspired uniforms can be broken down fully.
I wouldn't expect all of these videos to be the same length as the campaign videos but I still think they'd be interesting nonetheless. Especially once you get into games with wackier kill-streaks like Black Ops. Not all of them could be done this way, but I think that myself and others would still be interested in seeing the multiplayers broken down in the same way as the campaign.
Will you do call of duty big red one?
Never thought I'd hear "impregnated" in my ww2 historical analysis
You guys should definitely continue the series with some of the ww2 medal of honor games!
Wait…was the narrator for the British troops Jason Statham?!
How did I miss that when I was younger?!
Really nice. Do you think you'll ever look into Call of Duty 2: Big Red One? Apparently, it seems to have the most historical accuracy, especially since the devs got a lot of input from the actual veterans of BRO.
Oh boy he’s done COD2 and now COD1 I can’t wait for the COD3 video
2003 Call of Duty. Honestly, more accurate than Vanguard, not like that is difficult. Even with the, understandable due to technical limitations, inaccuracies, this game is still pretty good on being accurate. I certainly liked this game.
Of course then there's the Soviet campaign which starts off with Enemy at the Gates the playable movie. That can be excused as CoD loves doing this kind of stuff for dramatic and intense moments.
(Edit to correct for wrong year listed)
Yeah and if cod 1 2 3 united offensive finest hour big red one final fronts and roads to victory are being remastered that would fix those problems
Uhh this is from 2003, not 1999.
4:25
""for gameplay reasons this exist the way it does but i will mark it anyway""
really my dude lol
Kinda curious how many inaccuracy will be in medal of honor: Pacific assault
Next: Historical Inaccuracies in Call of Duty Black Ops 6
I really like that you acknowledged that a lot of these decisions are so because of ease of development or hardware limitations, and I'm doubly glad you'll keep pointing them out nonetheless. Great video as usual!
Appreciate the video. This was in my opinion, one of the best COD games. Even with the inaccuracies, much better than most.
what about a video of Brothers in Arms accuracies/inaccuries? i think it would be fun
Ah man, no dramatic intro? I loved those…
This game is based on real events from movies. The fact that in the end you are not Captain America taking Berlin is just amazing.
Awesome! SO EXCITED!
Company Of Heroes 2 is also guilty of using Enemy At The Gates for it's scenes set in Stalingrad.
As do most western propaganda pieces against the soviets in ww2.
@@mobiusraptor7i love the stalinist cope comment's
@@spencersecrest6001 This has nothing to do with being Pro-Soviet.It's getting history in games right.
@@spencersecrest6001 Besides,during the Cold War,both the Soviet Union and the West crack down on innocent protestors and supported authoritarian regimes throughout the world.Neither side were any better than the other.
@@ahmadhadi177 at least you acknowledge there both bad
Its nice to see TIK getting some recognition for his stalingrad series...by the way maybe you could take a look at earliest ww2 RTS games sudden strike series? And cod 1despite its flaws is really a very entertaining game that gets the setting correctly
Would you consider someday checking out Brothers in Arms?
After watching your series on historical inaccuracies, do you think there is a possibility of seeing this for the "Medal of Honor" series? I aware most, if not all (D-Day), missions are fictional, but I saw documentaries of the developers from the old games and the newest VR one, making in-depth research on the aesthetics, looks and locations rather than actual real operations done during WW2.
Yes it's about time we see this.
It's amazing that, despite being so inaccurate, the movie Enemy at the Gates inspired Call of duty so much. Might be inaccurate, but nowhere near Vanguard-level disrespectful.
If possible could you do, a comparison between WaW and WWII? Good vid, keep up the good work.
YAYA FROSTY UPLOADED AGAIN! LESSS GOOOO!$! Will you be doing Battlefield 1 next?
Has anyone played this game when it was new back in 02' or 03' including expansion pack united offensive like me? Admit it when this was new back then alot was blown away by its concept of alot of allied soldiers fighting along the player which topples the medal of honor gameplay.
This is dope id love to see you do the medal of honor games at some point
Great video
He returns!
You know newer CODs and Battlefields are bad when their historical inaccuracies videos are 30 minutes longer despite not even having half as much campaign
The man's finally getting around to it. Well done!
You should do some old MOH games. Vanguard, European Assualt, Rising Sun…
not to mention all the heer and kreigsmarine shore security units and base defence personal.
When cod 3 (2006) historical inaccuracies
can't wait for call of duty 3
I hope to see big red one, finest hour and cod3 soon on here since they were my introduction to the franchise.
0:44 I am noticed that when playing the game 😂
Asking Frosty to list historical inaccuracies in the Sniper Elite game series (day 1)
I just finshed a playthoghe of this great game and was thinking about your channle as i was playing i knew it was a matter of time for you to get to cod 1