Thanks for compiling and sharing, John. Comments: First time I can remember a 64 Topps Giant card making the list. The 70 Topps Clyde Wright made the list because of very few PSA 10s. The Schmidt sticker from Puerto Rico is a beautiful photo of him and in my opinion, much better than his 73 Topps rookie card.
I think you are correct about a Topps Giant card. The Clyde Wright was definitely a PSA registry purchase. And that is a cool pre-rookie card of Schmidt.
Yes, Reggie was definitely well-represented this month. Nice to see. The Clyde Wright had to be a PSA registry purchase. And that Schmidt card is really cool.
Some fun card. It still seems really surreal that two identically looking cards could have such vast difference in value just based on the number in the upper right corner.
I totally agree, especially when it's often hard to tell the difference between a 5 and 6 or an 8 from a 9, etc. Yet you sometimes have to pay a lot more for that jump of one number grade. That's why I seek out the best-looking card in a number grade I can afford. To me, it doesn't make sense to spend more money on a card just to have a number grade that is higher, especially if I can find one in a lower grade that looks just as good.
Thanks for compiling and sharing, John. Comments: First time I can remember a 64 Topps Giant card making the list. The 70 Topps Clyde Wright made the list because of very few PSA 10s. The Schmidt sticker from Puerto Rico is a beautiful photo of him and in my opinion, much better than his 73 Topps rookie card.
I think you are correct about a Topps Giant card. The Clyde Wright was definitely a PSA registry purchase. And that is a cool pre-rookie card of Schmidt.
I love all your videos, that 1954 Hank Aaron rookie was a stunner!!! Thank you for sharing
Thank you Kevin! It's a gorgeous copy!
Another great one Jon 🎉🎉
Thanks Ken!
Enjoyed as usual John this episode. Nice to see a Clemente 64 Giant. Clyde Wright?? Wow! Never seen B4 Schmidt card. Finally, Reggie Reggie!!😊
Yes, Reggie was definitely well-represented this month. Nice to see. The Clyde Wright had to be a PSA registry purchase. And that Schmidt card is really cool.
Some fun card. It still seems really surreal that two identically looking cards could have such vast difference in value just based on the number in the upper right corner.
I totally agree, especially when it's often hard to tell the difference between a 5 and 6 or an 8 from a 9, etc. Yet you sometimes have to pay a lot more for that jump of one number grade. That's why I seek out the best-looking card in a number grade I can afford. To me, it doesn't make sense to spend more money on a card just to have a number grade that is higher, especially if I can find one in a lower grade that looks just as good.
Awesome video, thanks for sharing
Thanks Orlando!
Crazy prices but great cards
I'm always fascinated by how much some people with much deeper pockets than I have pay for some of these cards.