thats not the case for every plane. Take for example the A350. Airbus is putting too many fancy things on the seats, TVs, and cabin. This makes the advanced tech mess with the radar, making it very unsafe.@@Potatogoodyea
@@yingzhang301 no it’s not the manufacturer airbus doing that it is the airline as they decide what seats go into the plane. Also the tvs and fancy tech cannot effect the planes radar as they are not connected by a cells tower.
@@CreatorBrix no, absolutely not, wind has absolutely nothing to do with it. Reverse thrust is used every time a passenger plane lands (usually until the plane is slower than 60 or 80 kts), because otherwise the plane would have too long of a braking distance and the normal wheel brakes would completely overheat. There are exactly two scenarios where reverse thrust is not used: 1. in the event of an engine failure, so that the aircraft does not drift off the runway when the reverser is only active on one side. 2. If the jet is so extremely light and the runway is so long that it is not necessary (but this is incredibly unlikely and would then require an aircraft the size of a CRJ-700 and not a widebody)
Dont get me wrong this pkane is amazing but boeing has been lacking recently. Airbus is currently in the lead. By the time this goes out to airlines there will be way over 1000 A350s. Boeing is going to have to have a massive re think soon. Because whilst they try get this airworthy airbus is already getting their freighter airworthy
That was smooth!
Beautiful
Beautiful video 🤩 can’t wait for the 777x to enter commercial service
@WhitekidpowderNOE it will enter service in 2025
2050 ??????
2025 idiot@@dsboykung
You are such an underrated RUclipsr, your content's quality is Amazing 👌🏻
For takeoff those GE engines are the best
Fantastic ❤
Amazing video ✈️
Awesome!!!
Butter!
It’s huge!
Big ahhh airplane
A lot of flutter on those rear stabilizers
Why do they do that??
normal on spoiler deployment, watch every other aircraft landing
@@adriananzano2292 Turbulence of air moving them?
Can't wait to fly on this model! Looks comfy and smooth.
And unsafe
@@ChaklitTeawdym unsafe? It’s more likely to get into a car crash then it is a plane crash.
@@Potatogoodyeahe’s just someone who thinks Boeing is all about killing people
thats not the case for every plane. Take for example the A350. Airbus is putting too many fancy things on the seats, TVs, and cabin. This makes the advanced tech mess with the radar, making it very unsafe.@@Potatogoodyea
@@yingzhang301 no it’s not the manufacturer airbus doing that it is the airline as they decide what seats go into the plane. Also the tvs and fancy tech cannot effect the planes radar as they are not connected by a cells tower.
finally you said you are one of the people who said it right its 777 9x
amazing landing sir
Que lindooooo demais esse avião ❤❤❤
Monsterous engine
Do these a/c enter into commercial service or remain test units/part out?
Probably from Top Gun flying it.
Feather or plane?
وحش السماء
the flaps looks worse than before
Must be a windy day bc the reverse thrust was on
Oh there testing the reverse thrust
bro on every flight there is reverse thrust even on commercial
@@Aviation_Videos123 not true only if its very windy or brakes not work
@@CreatorBrix if there are perfect conditions then maybe no reverse thrust
@@CreatorBrix
no, absolutely not, wind has absolutely nothing to do with it. Reverse thrust is used every time a passenger plane lands (usually until the plane is slower than 60 or 80 kts), because otherwise the plane would have too long of a braking distance and the normal wheel brakes would completely overheat.
There are exactly two scenarios where reverse thrust is not used:
1. in the event of an engine failure, so that the aircraft does not drift off the runway when the reverser is only active on one side.
2. If the jet is so extremely light and the runway is so long that it is not necessary (but this is incredibly unlikely and would then require an aircraft the size of a CRJ-700 and not a widebody)
Without psx Boeing devices are ok, different scenarios are not an option until 2027, goodbye killers
Dont get me wrong this pkane is amazing but boeing has been lacking recently. Airbus is currently in the lead. By the time this goes out to airlines there will be way over 1000 A350s. Boeing is going to have to have a massive re think soon. Because whilst they try get this airworthy airbus is already getting their freighter airworthy
NOOOOO I WISH THIS PLANE DON'T REPLACE 747 SAYS IN GOOGLE :( 😢😢😢
Is 300-er
🤮
cry abt it 😇
cry about it 😀
Beautiful