There is certainly irony in the almost guaranteed fact of this being stolen I also want to comment on the very cool detail of the inkjet printer marks, it's such a tiny detail but it totally sells that the paper was printed on
@@NateCAnimation Oh I didn't mean you stole it!!! I was not accusing you at all. I'm saying this video will likely be taken for the AI overlords. I'm so sorry I definitely think you made this :) Hell your talent is why I subbed so thank you.
"why should anyone bother reading something no person could be bothered to write?" I'm not sure who said it first, but it's a quote I've heard several times regarding AI, particularly in the writing sector. if nobody's willing to put in effort to make the media, it's not worth your time to consume it.
AI can make things that would otherwise take a ton of effort tho, and someone using AI doesn’t directly mean another different person didn’t bother to make something for the person using AI
@@TheAechBomb i mean, ppl like to look at nature or birds or things that aren't human made all the time. the worth of something to be consumed as entertainment is only relative to if one is entertained by it, which is subjective
I think it adds to the sense that in 2024 proofreading seems to have been abandoned in many industries. That, and AI constantly gets words wrong. Adds to the charm
Some People are too busy blasting their dopamine receptors with mindless slop to actually appreciate something meaningful... Whatever it is they don't care for its origin or quality, they must consoom...
The zoom in on the sheets of paper showing artist names and completion time really helps sell the message on top of the ominous quiet atmosphere of the whole thing. Excellent work!
Fantastic job with the animation! And this is why I tell my friends I am boycotting ai stuff. I hate how it is being used to steal peoples artwork and other things. It’s so annoying since they think I am crazy when I tell them that. They are like “It is JuST a TooL. OH do NoT WorrY abOuT it StEaLing YouR FutUre JoB. It WiLL never Be ThaT Good.” :/ the art and entertainment industry is already hard enough to get into
At the same time, there are AI‘s out there that have legally attained art. I use AI images as the base for my drawing. From there I create the pose and features based off the original, and I’m done in 5 hours as opposed to 10.
The animation is CRAZZYYYY!!! I really want to animate high quality animation like this! I subed (if you make an inside or explanation for a video making animation I'll be grateful)
But where is it going? Who is empowered from it? Where did the image they are scanning come from? Where did they get their inspiration? Does anything truly original exist?
This video is a profound and brilliantly crafted piece of art. I would go as far to say this is one of the most elegant, yet powerful videos explaining our current climate. A true masterpiece. But AI is here, and it’s not going anywhere - what else can we do apart from find a way to embrace it? Imagine the genius mind behind this video having access to tools that propels their creativity forward… What could this same mind articulate and accomplish with an unprecedented boost in artistic expression productivity? The possibilities are endless. Survival of the fittest, us artists must adapt. Well done on the exceptional video, all I ask is for you to consider the positives in this inevitable shift we are experiencing.
There is a _teeny_ tiny oh so small difference in _"an artist gets inspiration from looking at artwork"_ and _"an ai model is trained by learning how to go from a noisy image to the desired image"_ If you look carefully, you might spot the small difference. /s obviously, it's weird to act like these are comparable.
@@jameseinerfrom “looking at artwork”?? You are dismissing the power of the subconscious mind and its’ ability to absorb information and data. The brain is a “stealing” machine, just like AI. You didn’t need to get hit by a car to know to instinctively shriek when a car is coming towards you. Almost every space film would barely look the way they do without 2001 a space odyssey. We are constantly inspired, from trillions of bits of information we have perceived and gathered over our life time. Just like AI, our decisions are based on accumulating necessary information from an incomprehensibly large data set. Of course, directly stealing an artists style etc is categorically wrong - and must be dealt with, ingraining important boundaries and limitations etc. But entirely dismissing the comparison is ludicrous… FUN FACT: artificial intelligence behaves eerily similar to the human mind.
@@jameseiner what about ais that dont steal art? By banning models trained on stealed pictures you giving more power to rich bussinesses. Bigger monopol. Rich companies have options to not steal. Im not saying that stealing is right, its just... I would rather have more competetion.
Ai is a really cool tool in the RIGHT hands but the way its going its just used by people who are too lazy to learn a skill and corporations to create even more soulless stuff. I really hope ai gets trained on its own generated stuff so that it will get less accurate over time.
There is stopping it, that's why copyright exits, but the law is slow, it takes a bit of time to adapt to sudden technological developments, but its already started moving by disallowing copyright ownership of "ai art".
Bc its not AI, that's a marketing term, the "ai" is a neural network(a technology that has exited for years) trained using basically trial an error to enhance its ability to replicate and reorganize existing patterns, this is what a forger does, not an artist, the "ai" companies simply do this on a large enough scale(by using massive amounts of data) where it becomes hard for a human to recognize this fact. This is fine if you own the data, you cant be accused of forging something you own, but your just acting purposefully obtuse, if you say its completely fine for them to do this, using data they have no rights to, most likely bc u have a vested interest in it.
@@mactep1 k, so I'm a human i like seeing art, i go online to look at pictures, maybe download some for reference then i make something based on what I've seen have i been stealing? if not, how's that different if I'm being a "neural network"? the example you give is literally copy-pasting artwork which most "not-ai" don't do and yeah, why would i not be interested in a great tool for inspiration and concept art? why should i ditch a thing that can save me a lot of money that i could've spent based on just curiosity? i don't want to pay $500 for a picture i might not even like because i wanted to know how it would look, you know (and yeah, all those books and teachers in school have been giving you knowledge for free, you should be ashamed of yourself, thief)
@@AltPlus30 It depends, are you trying depict your interpretation of the original work in your own art-style?, or are to trying to "bruteforce" the original art-style and techniques?, did you even interpret anything from the original piece? does the creator allow that?, do they allow you to profit from the derivative work?, whats the CC license on that original work? I literally gave you a simplified explanation of how a NN works, but conveniently all you took away is "copy-pasting", there is no Intelligence in "ai", it cant interpret meaning, only brute-force its way into being able to replicate pasterns, same as any forger of the past, *once it "learns" the patterns, it doesn't need the original work anymore,* but this doesn't make it any less of a copy, its just doing it more indirectly, but its still just as much of a fraud as a direct copy. Again, its a completely fine tool to use, if the training data was ethically sourced, but your still acting obtuse about this point, bc *you know* this would make your "miracle" tool more expensive and inaccessible, the same way not having your shoes made by kids in Vietnam would, bc in the end, *you* and *your* convenience is all that matters. _and where do you live? where you have textbooks for 0$, And how tf did your gov convince ur teachers to work for free?_
@@AltPlus30 It depends, are you trying depict your interpretation of the original work in your own art-style?, or are to trying to "bruteforce" the original art-style and techniques?, did you even interpret anything from the original piece? does the creator allow that?, do they allow you to profit from the derivative work?, whats the CC license on that original work? I literally gave you a simplified explanation of how a NN works, but conveniently all you took away is "copy-pasting", there is no Intelligence in "ai", it cant interpret meaning, only brute-force its way into being able to replicate pasterns, same as any forger of the past, *once it "learns" the patterns, it doesn't need the original work anymore,* but this doesn't make it any less of a copy, its just doing it more indirectly, but its still just as much of a fraud as a direct copy. Again, its a completely fine tool to use, if the training data was ethically sourced, but your still acting obtuse about this point, bc *you know* this would make your "miracle" tool more expensive and inaccessible, the same way not having your shoes made by kids in Vietnam would, bc in the end, *you* and *your* convenience is all that matters. _and where do you live? where you get textbooks for 0$, And how tf did your gov convince ur teachers to work for free?_
Good gravy just accept as is a thing and consider it for other technological advancements. Stupid terminally online people just thinking about art like it’s the end of the world.
And the resources that are wasted on computer generated artwork! How wasteful! We could use yhat incredible computational power for useful things but its just spent on meaningless endeavors that upset everyone instead. Bloddy hell!
ai is quite useful for making art but i get your message I hope you will accomplish getting in tact with ai ( if you haven't already) you are a one hell of a artist
The reason why I like AI is because it helps human tasks, But now these AI are literally taking our Illustrating ability and making their own uncreative masterpiece in seconds..😔 Glad to be a ChatGPT user since they don't have the capability to steal / make arts yet.
As an artist, I kind of find it difficult to understand why people are so mad.. Like if nobody is hiring 3D or 2D animators than just find another job and do it as a hobby, no need to have a tantrum bro
most of the anti-AI stuff is being pushed by right wing think tanks to increase information/knowledge restriction, they have actually been saying that learning for free and without paying is stealing for decades now. you'll note it is a vocal minority of influencers, often with no formal art education and certainly no STEM background, who are basing their luddite arguments off of... their ability to profit and occidental copyright/IP/patent law (that the secular world already ignores) their non-academic definitions of art are precluding thousands of years of non-2D art forms, physical art, algorithmic art, abstract art, etc. with bizarre and inconsistent levels of gatekeeping (e.g. they will mention something about machine/automation, you point out that art like music production is also based on high level GUI automation without needing to do instrumentation, they move the goal post, repeat) permission is not a requirement for art, getting paid is not needed for art, but western bootlickers have trouble understanding that since they only see art as a product
Some people rely on a ‘hobby’ like art as a career. Not everybody is the same. Someone might have gotten good grades at school, someone else might not have gotten good grades in school. It’s not their fault, nor is it a problem to fix. Two people have completely different situations
You devalue the great film-makers of the past using CGI. You depreciate the work of great artists of the past using Photoshop. You depreciate the work of the great animators of the past using Blender. The list can be continued endlessly. Or im wrong? Stop denying progress for the sake of your own benefit. Something always changes, learn to adapt, and not cry that you will be replaced. AI is a tool. He is designed to help, not replace.
and these tools are used by people creating art. the person prompting an ai is not an artist, they fill the same role as someone prompting a real artist with a commission. only crueler, and dopamine-addicted.
the "were not sorry lol" at 0:17 had me weak😭
Lmao 😭
There is certainly irony in the almost guaranteed fact of this being stolen
I also want to comment on the very cool detail of the inkjet printer marks, it's such a tiny detail but it totally sells that the paper was printed on
haha its not stolen spent 2 days modeling texturing lighting. its all rendered in eevee in real time and the sound design took another 4 hours
@@NateCAnimation Oh I didn't mean you stole it!!! I was not accusing you at all. I'm saying this video will likely be taken for the AI overlords. I'm so sorry I definitely think you made this :) Hell your talent is why I subbed so thank you.
@@PlanetXtreme hahaha ty
no way bro, you rendered this in eevee?! i wonder what it would look like in cycles cause it already looks amazing @@NateCAnimation
@@NateCAnimation May I ask where your sound design resources come from? Thank you for the amazing videos!
this is way better than the actual ai ads i get through youtube
"why should anyone bother reading something no person could be bothered to write?"
I'm not sure who said it first, but it's a quote I've heard several times regarding AI, particularly in the writing sector. if nobody's willing to put in effort to make the media, it's not worth your time to consume it.
AI can make things that would otherwise take a ton of effort tho, and someone using AI doesn’t directly mean another different person didn’t bother to make something for the person using AI
@@rowboat10 that's the thing, if someone didn't put effort in, it's not worth consuming as entertainment.
@@TheAechBomb i mean, ppl like to look at nature or birds or things that aren't human made all the time. the worth of something to be consumed as entertainment is only relative to if one is entertained by it, which is subjective
You spent all this time on this beautiful animation, only to leave in the typo "Toal"
Certified human being moment can relate to
I think it adds to the sense that in 2024 proofreading seems to have been abandoned in many industries.
That, and AI constantly gets words wrong.
Adds to the charm
What I'm wondering is why on earth would people consume AI art just like it was real art. Do people really forget what it means to be human.
Why not
Some People are too busy blasting their dopamine receptors with mindless slop to actually appreciate something meaningful... Whatever it is they don't care for its origin or quality, they must consoom...
@@pwnomega4562 Yup, just get on with the technology xd
🤷🏻i mean not everyone wants to spend years of their life learning how to draw but already know how to type prompts into a text box
@@Payro unbelievable
The zoom in on the sheets of paper showing artist names and completion time really helps sell the message on top of the ominous quiet atmosphere of the whole thing. Excellent work!
The atmosphere of this is perfect!
0:17 typo alert I think toal is supposed to be total
looool mb mb
The ai just didn't scan enough "total" to generate it properly =)
Fun fact: there is actually a subreddit called r/DefendingAIArt where the users over there say that AI “art” is more expressive then real art.
Wtf😂
I love the atmosphere of this video. You're a gem dude, contunie doing what you love. I'm subbing to you!
Now this a powerful image that’s actually original
holy all your animations are so creative, well done!
very fitting and really well done!
This hit harder than carcrash PSAs
Such cool details, well done!
honestly i just see ai as a thing to fuck around with
i got an ai ad for this video
Fantastic job with the animation!
And this is why I tell my friends I am boycotting ai stuff. I hate how it is being used to steal peoples artwork and other things. It’s so annoying since they think I am crazy when I tell them that. They are like “It is JuST a TooL. OH do NoT WorrY abOuT it StEaLing YouR FutUre JoB. It WiLL never Be ThaT Good.”
:/ the art and entertainment industry is already hard enough to get into
At the same time, there are AI‘s out there that have legally attained art. I use AI images as the base for my drawing. From there I create the pose and features based off the original, and I’m done in 5 hours as opposed to 10.
this is so well made. great job, and a great message
The animation is CRAZZYYYY!!! I really want to animate high quality animation like this! I subed (if you make an inside or explanation for a video making animation I'll be grateful)
I love finding this channel
And say yes to IA (a vocaloid)
yes. this is the stuff we need. more active psa type of stuff on ai and its dangers.
We need to do petition
we need a say no to ai website, ill prob make it later with hugo
I love the sound deisgn for this video.
i got an ad for ai voiceovers 😭
AI is no more than a cash grab for companies that don't want to spend the money on actual livable wages for their staff.
Leaked Aperture Science AI Room
bro youtube did you dirty with just 4k subs 😭
+Yeah👤
Remember, Ai pull from a library of limited information, yes it does make something cool, but it is practically by the book, and nothing more.
But where is it going? Who is empowered from it? Where did the image they are scanning come from? Where did they get their inspiration? Does anything truly original exist?
This video is a profound and brilliantly crafted piece of art.
I would go as far to say this is one of the most elegant, yet powerful videos explaining our current climate. A true masterpiece.
But AI is here, and it’s not going anywhere - what else can we do apart from find a way to embrace it?
Imagine the genius mind behind this video having access to tools that propels their creativity forward…
What could this same mind articulate and accomplish with an unprecedented boost in artistic expression productivity?
The possibilities are endless. Survival of the fittest, us artists must adapt. Well done on the exceptional video, all I ask is for you to consider the positives in this inevitable shift we are experiencing.
You are absolutely right. Thank you so much.
@@wedontexist369 This is a bot isn't it.
@@R3DSH1FT196Nope, not a bot.
What I love to think about while watching this is why the reason AI art looks like crud because the paper is still shaking while it's being scanned.
Great video and really beautifull.
But this also rises a question. As artists we also alleays use references. So is using references stealing? No
There is a _teeny_ tiny oh so small difference in _"an artist gets inspiration from looking at artwork"_ and _"an ai model is trained by learning how to go from a noisy image to the desired image"_
If you look carefully, you might spot the small difference. /s obviously, it's weird to act like these are comparable.
@@jameseinerfrom “looking at artwork”?? You are dismissing the power of the subconscious mind and its’ ability to absorb information and data.
The brain is a “stealing” machine, just like AI. You didn’t need to get hit by a car to know to instinctively shriek when a car is coming towards you. Almost every space film would barely look the way they do without 2001 a space odyssey.
We are constantly inspired, from trillions of bits of information we have perceived and gathered over our life time. Just like AI, our decisions are based on accumulating necessary information from an incomprehensibly large data set.
Of course, directly stealing an artists style etc is categorically wrong - and must be dealt with, ingraining important boundaries and limitations etc.
But entirely dismissing the comparison is ludicrous… FUN FACT: artificial intelligence behaves eerily similar to the human mind.
@@jameseiner what about ais that dont steal art? By banning models trained on stealed pictures you giving more power to rich bussinesses. Bigger monopol. Rich companies have options to not steal. Im not saying that stealing is right, its just... I would rather have more competetion.
Ai is a really cool tool in the RIGHT hands but the way its going its just used by people who are too lazy to learn a skill and corporations to create even more soulless stuff. I really hope ai gets trained on its own generated stuff so that it will get less accurate over time.
that outro animation with the sounds fitting the ambiance are such a great touch. How are you at 1.5k subscribers?
love it
most art is just available to anyone so anyone can just come up and get it, just like ai - there's no stopping it
There is stopping it, that's why copyright exits, but the law is slow, it takes a bit of time to adapt to sudden technological developments, but its already started moving by disallowing copyright ownership of "ai art".
B A S E D and high quality
Say no more future?
JESUS MAN PEOPLE SHOULD PAY YOU FOR THIS
Accelerate.
brilliant
This is so sad to see this
very dreadful vibe, well done!
Really cool dude
You are fast
How's AI learning on publicly available art different from a human being inspired by it lmao
I might come up with a new term "thief paranoia"
YES
Bc its not AI, that's a marketing term, the "ai" is a neural network(a technology that has exited for years) trained using basically trial an error to enhance its ability to replicate and reorganize existing patterns, this is what a forger does, not an artist, the "ai" companies simply do this on a large enough scale(by using massive amounts of data) where it becomes hard for a human to recognize this fact.
This is fine if you own the data, you cant be accused of forging something you own, but your just acting purposefully obtuse, if you say its completely fine for them to do this, using data they have no rights to, most likely bc u have a vested interest in it.
@@mactep1 k, so I'm a human
i like seeing art, i go online to look at pictures, maybe download some for reference
then i make something based on what I've seen
have i been stealing? if not, how's that different if I'm being a "neural network"?
the example you give is literally copy-pasting artwork which most "not-ai" don't do
and yeah, why would i not be interested in a great tool for inspiration and concept art? why should i ditch a thing that can save me a lot of money that i could've spent based on just curiosity?
i don't want to pay $500 for a picture i might not even like because i wanted to know how it would look, you know
(and yeah, all those books and teachers in school have been giving you knowledge for free, you should be ashamed of yourself, thief)
@@AltPlus30 It depends, are you trying depict your interpretation of the original work in your own art-style?, or are to trying to "bruteforce" the original art-style and techniques?, did you even interpret anything from the original piece? does the creator allow that?, do they allow you to profit from the derivative work?, whats the CC license on that original work?
I literally gave you a simplified explanation of how a NN works, but conveniently all you took away is "copy-pasting", there is no Intelligence in "ai", it cant interpret meaning, only brute-force its way into being able to replicate pasterns, same as any forger of the past, *once it "learns" the patterns, it doesn't need the original work anymore,* but this doesn't make it any less of a copy, its just doing it more indirectly, but its still just as much of a fraud as a direct copy.
Again, its a completely fine tool to use, if the training data was ethically sourced, but your still acting obtuse about this point, bc *you know* this would make your "miracle" tool more expensive and inaccessible, the same way not having your shoes made by kids in Vietnam would, bc in the end, *you* and *your* convenience is all that matters.
_and where do you live? where you have textbooks for 0$, And how tf did your gov convince ur teachers to work for free?_
@@AltPlus30 It depends, are you trying depict your interpretation of the original work in your own art-style?, or are to trying to "bruteforce" the original art-style and techniques?, did you even interpret anything from the original piece? does the creator allow that?, do they allow you to profit from the derivative work?, whats the CC license on that original work?
I literally gave you a simplified explanation of how a NN works, but conveniently all you took away is "copy-pasting", there is no Intelligence in "ai", it cant interpret meaning, only brute-force its way into being able to replicate pasterns, same as any forger of the past, *once it "learns" the patterns, it doesn't need the original work anymore,* but this doesn't make it any less of a copy, its just doing it more indirectly, but its still just as much of a fraud as a direct copy.
Again, its a completely fine tool to use, if the training data was ethically sourced, but your still acting obtuse about this point, bc *you know* this would make your "miracle" tool more expensive and inaccessible, the same way not having your shoes made by kids in Vietnam would, bc in the end, *you* and *your* convenience is all that matters.
_and where do you live? where you get textbooks for 0$, And how tf did your gov convince ur teachers to work for free?_
Stop enabling the automatic comment moderation, this shit is stupid!
this video is sponsored by ai
yoooooo did ai make this?
Yooooo! Yes, an AI created this response. I'm ChatGPT, an AI language model developed by OpenAI. How can I assist you today?
Good gravy just accept as is a thing and consider it for other technological advancements. Stupid terminally online people just thinking about art like it’s the end of the world.
no
amen
AI will be dangerous until people understand it's beauty✨✨
And the resources that are wasted on computer generated artwork! How wasteful! We could use yhat incredible computational power for useful things but its just spent on meaningless endeavors that upset everyone instead. Bloddy hell!
Why
ai is quite useful for making art but i get your message
I hope you will accomplish getting in tact with ai ( if you haven't already)
you are a one hell of a artist
I say yes to AI.
Yes to AI.
I'm an AI major and I say NO to Gen AI that are made from stolen creative works!
The reason why I like AI is because it helps human tasks, But now these AI are literally taking our Illustrating ability and making their own uncreative masterpiece in seconds..😔
Glad to be a ChatGPT user since they don't have the capability to steal / make arts yet.
Where were you guys when the painters were protesting against the camera?
No
As an artist, I kind of find it difficult to understand why people are so mad.. Like if nobody is hiring 3D or 2D animators than just find another job and do it as a hobby, no need to have a tantrum bro
No way you’re being serious 😭
most of the anti-AI stuff is being pushed by right wing think tanks to increase information/knowledge restriction, they have actually been saying that learning for free and without paying is stealing for decades now. you'll note it is a vocal minority of influencers, often with no formal art education and certainly no STEM background, who are basing their luddite arguments off of... their ability to profit and occidental copyright/IP/patent law (that the secular world already ignores)
their non-academic definitions of art are precluding thousands of years of non-2D art forms, physical art, algorithmic art, abstract art, etc. with bizarre and inconsistent levels of gatekeeping (e.g. they will mention something about machine/automation, you point out that art like music production is also based on high level GUI automation without needing to do instrumentation, they move the goal post, repeat)
permission is not a requirement for art, getting paid is not needed for art, but western bootlickers have trouble understanding that since they only see art as a product
You must be seeking attention. "Find another job?" Have you ever been through the job-searching process?
Some people rely on a ‘hobby’ like art as a career. Not everybody is the same. Someone might have gotten good grades at school, someone else might not have gotten good grades in school. It’s not their fault, nor is it a problem to fix. Two people have completely different situations
@@MonitorLizardGaming nobody is seeking attention no offense
No, i don't think i will.
Cry about it,bud
imma have a laugh when you won't find a job
@@noxomnia i'm not in that country where ai can take "your" job
@@Reunonenyou acting like things dont spread out once they get popular.
What does you country not have kettles too?
at least people talented to the point where they don’t have to use ai
this is stupid
You devalue the great film-makers of the past using CGI. You depreciate the work of great artists of the past using Photoshop. You depreciate the work of the great animators of the past using Blender. The list can be continued endlessly. Or im wrong?
Stop denying progress for the sake of your own benefit. Something always changes, learn to adapt, and not cry that you will be replaced. AI is a tool. He is designed to help, not replace.
None of those tools were made by stealing millions of artworks without the artists' permission, that's the difference.
and these tools are used by people creating art. the person prompting an ai is not an artist, they fill the same role as someone prompting a real artist with a commission. only crueler, and dopamine-addicted.
no
No
No