Seriously, these videos are super well done are so helpful. I don't mind small errors or changes and editing the video is not worth it. Especially if you preview the video and take notes. It's not like 9:20 is a huge investment in time.
Honestly, I like that you show mistakes. Following tutorials sometimes gives a false impression of confidence that quickly fades when you try your own projects.
I know this was an old video. but I just checked it tonight and I really want to thank you, you dont know what this means to me, I've been trying to bake into normal maps for 3 weeks but never got good result till I finally learned from this video, thank you, wish you succeed more and more in this field
I was struggling with baking with the previous tutorials but with the Cage method, I got amazing results, and of course, it's all thankfulness for your efforts.
Funny thing, at this point in my life I have both a blender baking issue (I need to learn it) and a baking-baking issue (There's a yeast shortage where I live).
I'm just one month old but I can say this is the best baking tutorial ever in baking normal maps! I understood it right away. I've seen some but not explaining the reasons/purpose of the steps.
Baking with a cage in Blender is something I wanted to learn, especially to get rid of baking in Marmoset (at least for now), thank you very much for the ever helpful tutorials!
Thank you for this. I have always had difficulty getting truly good normal maps made; now I not only know the reason why, I have a ready solution. This is going to greatly improve my render times, and the overall quality of my art. Along with many of the other tutorial makers here on RUclips (CG Geek, Andrew Price, etc), your content has helped me grow; please keep up the amazing work!
I drop render samples from 128 down to 10. Then in “performance” (just below that) I change “tiles” from 64 up to 512. Now it bakes WAY faster and result looks incredible
I found out that for complex objects its better to use solidify modifier for low poly cage and after applying the modifier delete the inner portion of mesh. That way you dont need to adjust manually too many faces and the cage nicely covers the high poly.
Fyi, these types of cages have since been implemented in Blender under the "extrusion" setting in the bake options. :) you only need a cage if your geometry is complex. Maybe even concave.
Some days it feels like I'm really grasping Blender. Other days I feel like I have only scratched the surface! Wonder if I'll ever get good? Thanks again for your free resources. I'm a mature, self taught student who is not working, so they are very helpful.
your only scratching the surface if you keep looking on youtube. All the same easy kinda tutorials. But if you ask more difficult stuff, they can't do shit. The uploader don't even show the end result which i have on my screen right now. It's horrible. He probably made that normal map from a texture and not from a mesh. I knew this was not right. Glad i use adblocker.
I'm gonna try this method out I never really understood the cage option but since it can give me a perfect baked normal render like the one you've just made, I'm gonna give it a try and see how we'll it works on the model I'm making
This was super useful! As I haven't used baking much before, your baking series were super useful especially this one. Used it on one of the most complicated freelance projects I've ever had :D
extremely useful. I have those *valleyball seams or football ball seams* and I hope this wil help me get rid of it. I read a lot of edvices online and none mentioned baking with a cage. BTW, it finally worked very nicely :)
I have noticed if my low poly mesh is too low poly it will create weird jagged shadows. It took me a good hour to realise what went wrong with my bake. But on the end subdividing helped me out.
Blender was giving me some difficulties with this that I'll explain here, including how I fixed it, in case anyone else runs into the same issue. I was following the tutorial step-by-step with no issues until it got time to actually bake the map. For whatever reason, I kept getting the error that the Cage object had a different number of faces than the Active (low-poly) object, and so it wouldn't do the bake, even though I made doubly sure that I duplicated the low-poly mesh and just scaled it up. No modifiers, no editing other than that. I was still getting this error though. Restarting Blender didn't fix it and reduplicating the low-poly mesh to make a new cage didn't seem to fix it either. What did fix it, is whenever I tried to bake it backwards. Instead of selecting the high-poly mesh first and low-poly mesh second, I instead selected them backwards and attempted the bake. Ironically, it went through, though obviously with unwanted results. Seeing as it worked this time, I decided to reselect them in the correct order and re-attempt the bake. Lo and behold, it actually worked with no Blender errors. I hope this really odd issue doesn't bug anyone else, but if it does I hope that my fix works for you too. Happy Blending.
@@grabbitt I have the same problem. Blender gives a warning as low and hig poly mesh must be same numbers. Is there any way to fix it? I just followed the video and the result is as I mentioned. It just gives a warning and not finishes the nomal baking.
@ i think you are trying to use a cage - your cage must have the same polycount as the low poly
4 года назад+2
@@grabbitt This time it is close to perfect 👍 There are some glitches but I know why are they and I can handle it easly. The big thing is I really understand the baking 😊👍 Thank you Grant Abbitt 🧡👍 After having a good baking as quaick as possible I tried texture painting but where I paint with brush it paints the other side. Is there a way to fix it?
I think I figured out a weird quirk with Blender. If you are clicking objects with the outliner, it seems that the object you click First is your Active Object, and it stays that way no matter what you click next. However, this is reversed when clicking the same objects in the same order from within the 3D Viewport---there, you will get the second object clicked becomes the active. (v 2.83a) I tried this until my eyes bled to make sure I wasn't going crazy, watching how the object names changed colors to indicate which was active vs selected
It's nice to know the basics of cage projection, but tbh, you really should be showing this on a character where you have to project into a mouth, in arm pits & between fingers.
PS with the new tricks in bl 2.80, you can make use of the normal direction checker. If you flip the normals of the cage and than go into that view. You would clearly see item popping true because the normals are Red and Blue. Its under Overlays > Face Orientation. Quite a handy feature to use for this.
I do hope they can some port items from baking from Blender Internal now to Cycles. Blender internal had some options which Cycles does not have. I dont see a method to bake just Vertex Colors?
@@grabbitt I think i read something about using an attribute node. Perhaps it can be done that way. Im not sure if they would take such a feature out. It is possible, see here blender.stackexchange.com/questions/45964/how-to-bake-to-vertex-colors-in-blender-cycles
God thank you so much for this! I was really searching for an understandable explanation and example about how ray distances work just like you did at 1:11... be blessed♥
Had huge difficulty with this until I realised that in 2.9 the last selected mesh from the list doesn't become active and I had to pic it from the 3d view - thanks for all your awesome videos
Thanks! Not easy, but it's doable. Just make sure your objects are smooth shaded (rightclick in Object mode -> Shade smooth), or you will get weird creases, at least that worked for me on my mesh (a damaged concrete wall). EDIT: If the normal map is going to be displayed on a smooth shaded mesh it should be baked on a smooth shaded mesh; and vice versa: bake on flat shaded if it will be displayed on a flat shaded object. This because the tangent space basis must be exactly the same.
This technology man ahaha. like go fgures we have to build a cage around light to set up a paremeter. - But i was thinking. In reverse, couldn't you bake in the negative direction? So your HPoly is larger than your LPoly retopo mesh and you direct the textures on the Hpoly faces down, (shrinking them a bit also ) unto the LPoly Retopo mesh? So in essence you build your retopo not around or above your HPoly mesh but within it, so it is slightly smaller. That way there are no curvatures that don't overlap strangely or not at all.
Why is he wrapping both, well i better do it too. *UNWRAP* continues video "Well i'm just back from a crash.." *BLENDER HAS STOPPED WORKING* ... Well shit biscuits!
Thanks for this useful tutorial. Keep making mistakes because I learn a lot from them... and if you don't make them... I'll do make them... but I'll do'nt know where they are coming from.
Unnfortunately, I have encountered an issue that makes the inflated cage approach as introduced in the video unusable. When I use alt+s (shrink/fatten) to scale the cage along the normals, some vertices and faces get deleted! My low poly has 66 307 faces, when I fatten the cage so that it covers the entire high poly model only 66 305 faces remain! As a result, when I want to bake it stops with an error that the poly count must be the same... Any ideas, Grant, how to go about this? Using "max ray distance" gives bad results, because the high poly sticks out from the low poly.
I just encountered the same problem. The thing was that my "Auto Merge Vertices" was ON and while scaling some of the vertices came too close and merged. Check if you did the same mistake and just turn it OFF. That should solve the problem :)
been on this for the whole day, after this tutorial things have been going slightly better but there's still a weird issue where some part of the mesh gets darker and I don't get it.
I've been trying to use this method to make normals for a big object (make out of multiples ones that i joined together) but for some reason, I don't get normals for like half the stuff in the scene. any suggestions?
I just spent 20 minutes trying to bake a normal map and it had a bunch of glitches and stuff even though i used a cage. Turns out I forgot to uv unwrap it.
Hi Grant. I have a high poly brick that I want to bake the displacement of. I have blender 2.82. Is this possible? And if so . . . Any chance of a tutorial?
thank you to share the video,I understand the useful of cage.I notice that the "ray distance",may I ask this para work outside and inside the lowpoly ?or just outside the low poly?
time passes but I still didn't get the correctly baked normal map, it's either all messy (better than without cage tho) or simply doesn't update. I just can't imagine how everyone around do this correctly, if there's something I missing?
I've been playing with Displacement, but when I use them my PC really chugs and it rarely does. For static renders, and/or arch/viz walkthrough animations are Displacement maps more efficient or is it faster/better to just have a high-poly mesh? The latter seems to be the case to me but I could be doing something wrong. Thanks
DId you already have time to look at the addon "Bakemyscan"? I had some issues gettting dynamesh to work on osx, but that is solved now. The cool thing about Bakemyscan is that you got quit some opions to do the remeshes. But it can also super asily do you bakes etc etc.
Is it normal that the baked textures come out as 2D textures on your retopo? The cage worked succesfully in almost all ways but i realized it was 2D. When i did the baking without cage i got many glitches in the bake following ray distance, i tried a few, but it also seems to make it all 2D.
Hi Grant, thank you for another excellent tutorial, extremely helpful! My normal maps look much better when I use cages. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but does the size of the cage actually matter? Like, the tighter it fits around the other meshes, the better? Or will the results be the same, no matter how tight or loose the cage fits?
It's good when you make mistakes and correct them live as we can also learn how to correct them following your examples.
Yes I feel that's important too :)
very well pointing it out
Seriously, these videos are super well done are so helpful. I don't mind small errors or changes and editing the video is not worth it. Especially if you preview the video and take notes. It's not like 9:20 is a huge investment in time.
I say that exact same thing when I make videos lol... But the partial truth is I don't have patience to edit videos.
Honestly, I like that you show mistakes. Following tutorials sometimes gives a false impression of confidence that quickly fades when you try your own projects.
I know this was an old video. but I just checked it tonight and I really want to thank you, you dont know what this means to me, I've been trying to bake into normal maps for 3 weeks but never got good result till I finally learned from this video, thank you, wish you succeed more and more in this field
Side tip for finding overlaps: use object viewport coloring, that way the overlap area will stick out visibly.
Dude, I spent like two hours jumping from video to video looking to fix that exact issue, you've saved my psychological stability
I was struggling with baking with the previous tutorials but with the Cage method, I got amazing results, and of course, it's all thankfulness for your efforts.
I am really glad you had the same ray distance issue I had when baking because last video I was panicking but you solved it here. What a relief!
Funny thing, at this point in my life I have both a blender baking issue (I need to learn it) and a baking-baking issue (There's a yeast shortage where I live).
I'm just one month old but I can say this is the best baking tutorial ever in baking normal maps! I understood it right away. I've seen some but not explaining the reasons/purpose of the steps.
Baking with a cage in Blender is something I wanted to learn, especially to get rid of baking in Marmoset (at least for now), thank you very much for the ever helpful tutorials!
Thank you my Mr Abbitt, you're a great teacher and a lifesaver!
I must say best blender channel out there
Thank you for this. I have always had difficulty getting truly good normal maps made; now I not only know the reason why, I have a ready solution. This is going to greatly improve my render times, and the overall quality of my art. Along with many of the other tutorial makers here on RUclips (CG Geek, Andrew Price, etc), your content has helped me grow; please keep up the amazing work!
Fuck me dude this is amazing. This is basically deciding the ray distance for individual parts. Absolute legend for making this video.
Thanks :)
Thank you so much! This is just what I needed to bake a cave normal map with no bugs
"despite all my rage, I am still just a -rat- rock in a cage". Thanks for the tutorial grant, great stuff.
This video is a godsent, I have been trying to bake a normal map for 3 hours now and it finally worked with this
This video was so helpful Grant! Never quite understood how to use the Cage properly. This was very well explained. Thank you!
You saved my dragonslayer, and his normal texture (plus my nerves), thank you so much. sir
I drop render samples from 128 down to 10.
Then in “performance” (just below that) I change “tiles” from 64 up to 512.
Now it bakes WAY faster and result looks incredible
I found out that for complex objects its better to use solidify modifier for low poly cage and after applying the modifier delete the inner portion of mesh. That way you dont need to adjust manually too many faces and the cage nicely covers the high poly.
clever idea :)
Fyi, these types of cages have since been implemented in Blender under the "extrusion" setting in the bake options. :) you only need a cage if your geometry is complex. Maybe even concave.
Amazingggggggggg. Man, Blender really is a lot more user friendly than 3ds max once you take some time to learn it.
good to hear :)
Youre the best. Thank you for breaking this stuff down for those of us who have virtually no idea about why these things behave the way they do.
Thanks :)
Awesome. Looking forward to the cavity map vid.
Yep on its way :)
Some days it feels like I'm really grasping Blender. Other days I feel like I have only scratched the surface! Wonder if I'll ever get good?
Thanks again for your free resources. I'm a mature, self taught student who is not working, so they are very helpful.
Thanks :) keep going and keep having fun :)
Howd this tut go for u then
your only scratching the surface if you keep looking on youtube.
All the same easy kinda tutorials.
But if you ask more difficult stuff, they can't do shit. The uploader don't even show the end result which i have on my screen right now.
It's horrible.
He probably made that normal map from a texture and not from a mesh.
I knew this was not right. Glad i use adblocker.
haters gun hate.
Thanks for the excellence Mr. Abbitt
@@ProgNoizesB I did this for my shield and got a very good game object with 1k polygons and nice sculpted wood parts embedded into the normal map
Alt + S was the whole video for me.
Thank you!
You can also use Solidify modifier instead of manually scaling in edit mode. Should give good results most of the times
That's an interesting idea
Doesn't it create doubt the verts?
Great tutorial. My system isn't baking quickly, and messing with Ray distance was killing me. Cage worked and quickly.
I'm gonna try this method out I never really understood the cage option but since it can give me a perfect baked normal render like the one you've just made, I'm gonna give it a try and see how we'll it works on the model I'm making
Finally gotten round to trying High to Low Poly normals. Great video. Thanks Grant ;)
Thanks :)
I didn't understand nothing because my english is very bad, but it worked, and I don't know why, thank you for doing this tutorial :D
Very informative and clear, thank you!
Thanks :)
You're the hero we deserve and definitely need!
Thank you, easy to follow, covered everything I needed, and a good voice for tutorials!
This was super useful! As I haven't used baking much before, your baking series were super useful especially this one. Used it on one of the most complicated freelance projects I've ever had :D
Just found this and it saved me lots of headaches trying to figure out what was going wrong with my baked textures. Thank you!!!!
Thank you so much for this series Grant. I'm impressed by the power of baking maps!
Thanks :)
Tks again and again! using the cage I reached a huge diferent result for my AO texture.
Nice
extremely useful. I have those *valleyball seams or football ball seams* and I hope this wil help me get rid of it. I read a lot of edvices online and none mentioned baking with a cage. BTW, it finally worked very nicely :)
thank you so much for this video 🙏🙏🙏🙏I was about to throw my whole project away because my normals wouldn't bake right
Alt+S... I completely understood how cages work, but this shortcut is what was missing! Thank you! :D
good tutorial simpel and quick without any unnecessary explanations
Thanks that's one of my main aims :)
I have noticed if my low poly mesh is too low poly it will create weird jagged shadows. It took me a good hour to realise what went wrong with my bake. But on the end subdividing helped me out.
Yeah that's more s lighting issues than mesh issue
Blender was giving me some difficulties with this that I'll explain here, including how I fixed it, in case anyone else runs into the same issue.
I was following the tutorial step-by-step with no issues until it got time to actually bake the map. For whatever reason, I kept getting the error that the Cage object had a different number of faces than the Active (low-poly) object, and so it wouldn't do the bake, even though I made doubly sure that I duplicated the low-poly mesh and just scaled it up. No modifiers, no editing other than that. I was still getting this error though. Restarting Blender didn't fix it and reduplicating the low-poly mesh to make a new cage didn't seem to fix it either.
What did fix it, is whenever I tried to bake it backwards. Instead of selecting the high-poly mesh first and low-poly mesh second, I instead selected them backwards and attempted the bake. Ironically, it went through, though obviously with unwanted results. Seeing as it worked this time, I decided to reselect them in the correct order and re-attempt the bake. Lo and behold, it actually worked with no Blender errors.
I hope this really odd issue doesn't bug anyone else, but if it does I hope that my fix works for you too. Happy Blending.
very interesting.
@@grabbitt I have the same problem. Blender gives a warning as low and hig poly mesh must be same numbers. Is there any way to fix it? I just followed the video and the result is as I mentioned. It just gives a warning and not finishes the nomal baking.
@ i think you are trying to use a cage - your cage must have the same polycount as the low poly
@@grabbitt This time it is close to perfect 👍 There are some glitches but I know why are they and I can handle it easly. The big thing is I really understand the baking 😊👍 Thank you Grant Abbitt 🧡👍 After having a good baking as quaick as possible I tried texture painting but where I paint with brush it paints the other side. Is there a way to fix it?
I think I figured out a weird quirk with Blender. If you are clicking objects with the outliner, it seems that the object you click First is your Active Object, and it stays that way no matter what you click next. However, this is reversed when clicking the same objects in the same order from within the 3D Viewport---there, you will get the second object clicked becomes the active. (v 2.83a) I tried this until my eyes bled to make sure I wasn't going crazy, watching how the object names changed colors to indicate which was active vs selected
This video helped me a lot! Thanks
Taking a personal note for reference: alt+s is for scaling via normals, then shift is for increasing mouse sensitivity on the scale operation.
Top of the Top!
It's nice to know the basics of cage projection, but tbh, you really should be showing this on a character where you have to project into a mouth, in arm pits & between fingers.
It would be tough for people to follow along
PS with the new tricks in bl 2.80, you can make use of the normal direction checker. If you flip the normals of the cage and than go into that view. You would clearly see item popping true because the normals are Red and Blue. Its under Overlays > Face Orientation. Quite a handy feature to use for this.
I do hope they can some port items from baking from Blender Internal now to Cycles. Blender internal had some options which Cycles does not have. I dont see a method to bake just Vertex Colors?
no you cant bake vertex colours any more it seems. I will try the normal's direction checker in future :)
@@grabbitt I think i read something about using an attribute node. Perhaps it can be done that way. Im not sure if they would take such a feature out. It is possible, see here blender.stackexchange.com/questions/45964/how-to-bake-to-vertex-colors-in-blender-cycles
@@RomboutVersluijs ah yes that makes sense I wonder how different this is from the pointiness node?
@@grabbitt i find it weird that its a bit hidden. While BI engine it was dedicated option.
God thank you so much for this! I was really searching for an understandable explanation and example about how ray distances work just like you did at 1:11... be blessed♥
Thanks 😃
Awesome tutorial, even better than blender guru!
Thanks
Thank yoU!,, this resolved the issue I was having with baking high res to low res map
*3:48 I recomend using a displace modifier. But other than that great video
yes makes sense
Had huge difficulty with this until I realised that in 2.9 the last selected mesh from the list doesn't become active and I had to pic it from the 3d view - thanks for all your awesome videos
yes the outliner has changed slightly i think
Absolutely beautiful tutorial! Thank you, thank you!
Thanks :)
baking hard surface textures for substance painter (NOT MESH just the painting normals):
deselect 32bit float and leave at sRGB
This tutorial was awesomeee, just what I was looking for, thanks!
Thanks :)
Thanks! Not easy, but it's doable. Just make sure your objects are smooth shaded (rightclick in Object mode -> Shade smooth), or you will get weird creases, at least that worked for me on my mesh (a damaged concrete wall). EDIT: If the normal map is going to be displayed on a smooth shaded mesh it should be baked on a smooth shaded mesh; and vice versa: bake on flat shaded if it will be displayed on a flat shaded object. This because the tangent space basis must be exactly the same.
Thank you very much Grant, I was waiting for that 😁👍🏻
:)
This technology man ahaha. like go fgures we have to build a cage around light to set up a paremeter.
- But i was thinking. In reverse, couldn't you bake in the negative direction? So your HPoly is larger than your LPoly retopo mesh and you direct the textures on the Hpoly faces down, (shrinking them a bit also ) unto the LPoly Retopo mesh? So in essence you build your retopo not around or above your HPoly mesh but within it, so it is slightly smaller.
That way there are no curvatures that don't overlap strangely or not at all.
i just want you to know I love you
Thank you man
Omg this is what I needed! xDDDD
Many thanks
Perfect thanks grant
Thanks :)
This is an awesome Blender tutorial I love it. :D
Thanks :)
Grant Abbitt You're very welcome. :)
nice tips. Thank you!
Thanks :)
thanks!!
The same principle of baking in 2.8 can be used for AO & height maps I guess?
yes
short and sweet :D super useful
Thanks :)
thnx mate
Why is he wrapping both, well i better do it too. *UNWRAP* continues video "Well i'm just back from a crash.." *BLENDER HAS STOPPED WORKING* ... Well shit biscuits!
yeah its got much better since then :)
😂😂👌!
Thanks man.
Thanks :)
Thanks i completely misunderstood cage and had selected my low poly
Thanks for this useful tutorial. Keep making mistakes because I learn a lot from them... and if you don't make them... I'll do make them... but I'll do'nt know where they are coming from.
Thanks :)
Superb cheers mate
thanks :)
great stuff... thumbs up
AMazing Tutorial Thanks, it is too bad I didn't know about it sooner
Thanks 😃
Unnfortunately, I have encountered an issue that makes the inflated cage approach as introduced in the video unusable. When I use alt+s (shrink/fatten) to scale the cage along the normals, some vertices and faces get deleted! My low poly has 66 307 faces, when I fatten the cage so that it covers the entire high poly model only 66 305 faces remain! As a result, when I want to bake it stops with an error that the poly count must be the same... Any ideas, Grant, how to go about this? Using "max ray distance" gives bad results, because the high poly sticks out from the low poly.
i've no idea why that would be sorry
I just encountered the same problem. The thing was that my "Auto Merge Vertices" was ON and while scaling some of the vertices came too close and merged. Check if you did the same mistake and just turn it OFF. That should solve the problem :)
Очень хорошие уроки!
Раньше смотрел ваши уроки, но на русском языке. Очень нравится!
been on this for the whole day, after this tutorial things have been going slightly better but there's still a weird issue where some part of the mesh gets darker and I don't get it.
Amy part of your high poly that goes through you cage will not work
@@grabbitt I'll try again today with a closed mesh, previous ones had holes in the back, might be why it was failing.
Not sure why but my cage still isnt baking my normal maps properly. I've made sure everything was ok too...
Check normals
I keep getting a circular dependency error using this method. I have used it on other objects successfully but now I don't know what the issue is.
it should still work. if not unplug the texture
Круто, спасибо :)
Thanks :)
I've been trying to use this method to make normals for a big object (make out of multiples ones that i joined together) but for some reason, I don't get normals for like half the stuff in the scene. any suggestions?
could be a number of issues but mainly check face direction
I just spent 20 minutes trying to bake a normal map and it had a bunch of glitches and stuff even though i used a cage. Turns out I forgot to uv unwrap it.
Hi Grant.
I have a high poly brick that I want to bake the displacement of.
I have blender 2.82.
Is this possible? And if so . . . Any chance of a tutorial?
haven't done that for a while so would have to look into it
thank you to share the video,I understand the useful of cage.I notice that the "ray distance",may I ask this para work outside and inside the lowpoly ?or just outside the low poly?
outside the high poly
For some reason, the "cage" thing isn't working for me...
omg it's working I am crying ;___;
There's no uv unwraping needed for Hp or LP?
Edit: sorry, I jumped the gun😅
Can we use a shrinkwrap modifier first or it's better to don't do it for a cage ?
Yes that works as well
time passes but I still didn't get the correctly baked normal map, it's either all messy (better than without cage tho) or simply doesn't update. I just can't imagine how everyone around do this correctly, if there's something I missing?
Check the have direction and doubles
When baking, you dont need to unwrap the high poly one correct?
indeed
I've been playing with Displacement, but when I use them my PC really chugs and it rarely does. For static renders, and/or arch/viz walkthrough animations are Displacement maps more efficient or is it faster/better to just have a high-poly mesh? The latter seems to be the case to me but I could be doing something wrong. Thanks
Displacement maps are better in some way but it still requires high poly
DId you already have time to look at the addon "Bakemyscan"? I had some issues gettting dynamesh to work on osx, but that is solved now. The cool thing about Bakemyscan is that you got quit some opions to do the remeshes. But it can also super asily do you bakes etc etc.
interesting i will have to look that up :)
Do you know when 2.8 will be put fully?
And great video too.
for some reason i have June/ July in my head cant remember where i heard that though
Is it normal that the baked textures come out as 2D textures on your retopo? The cage worked succesfully in almost all ways but i realized it was 2D.
When i did the baking without cage i got many glitches in the bake following ray distance, i tried a few, but it also seems to make it all 2D.
Baked textures are all 2d
Hi Grant, thank you for another excellent tutorial, extremely helpful! My normal maps look much better when I use cages. Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but does the size of the cage actually matter? Like, the tighter it fits around the other meshes, the better? Or will the results be the same, no matter how tight or loose the cage fits?
Tighter fit is more accurate
@@grabbitt Thanks for replying, much appreciated!