The exception being if you know your rival is self-destructive. After Manzikert, the Seljuks released Emperor Romanos IV, and were likely pleasantly surprised to see the Romans spiral into a civil war which would forever open Anatolia to the Turks.
Hello. I'm from Argentina. As a teenager, I went to a school that had a very strong nationalist-catholic-hispanist ideology. As such, the reigns of the Reyes Catolicos, Charles V (or I ) and Philip II were a very important part of our histoy classes. Also, the "what would happened if only..." was a very usual position. Then i studied in a catholic university and these subjects were relatively relevant in the Modern History curriculum. But i dont remember ever hearing about this abandonment of the "burgundian" strategy by Charles as a posible reason for the failure of his proyect. I've been listening your streams for some weeks and i found them very informative. Congratulations for your work
Despite being an Anglican, I actually wish mainland Europe had been United on a Christian empire. Europe had always torn itself apart rather then being conquered. The US didn’t conquer Europe, it collected the scraps of what was left after the war.
I speak Italian 🇮🇹 with the ambassadors, French 🇨🇵 with the women, German 🇩🇪 with the soldiers, English 🏴 with the horses, and Spanish 🇪🇸 with God ✝️ CHARLES V.
It's definitely frustrating that the overwhelming majority of historical content on RUclips is just summaries of broad events, the niche of detailed longform content absolutely needs more attention
@@austin-9132honestly though, the condensing of history really serves a purpose too... think just how many young boys must become fascinated with history from something like "Kings and Generals". From there, there's all kinds of intermediate content to pretty advanced like "mlaser history"... come to think of it, RUclips history may be a good example about how a so-called "free market" innovates, discovers niches and provides utility. But overall, I agree... immense value from longform like AM. The real meaning of history is revealed in these details.
The historical fiction novel Ascanio by Alexander Dumas shows Francis I making a similar mistake when Charles traveled through French territory. Francis made Charles promise that Francis would receive Milan but didn't even ask Charles to put anything in writing because he believed his word was enough. In Ascanio, Francis is portrayed as the idealist obsessed with chivalry while Charles is the more machievelian one.
So he should have acted like the emperor Sigismund at the Council of Constance(early 1400's) that gave czech reformer Jan Hus safe conduct to the council but then reneged and had him burnt at the stake!? Church had to be reformed otherwise Europe would have gone into a steep decline.
Wouldn't Ferdinand still have been chosen as king of the romans instead of Charles' son? Even if Charles achieved his strategy, Ferdinand is still more popular with the princes of the empire.
First the hens, then the dogs went absolutely berserk, so I'll have to give this a couple more goes. I'm prone to the "just imagine if..." urge when reading, discussing, writing and listening to analysis of history. Braver for a few more minutes here, head screwed on better there and a bit luckier with this and that...
Also I thought the Netherlands provided much more income then Castile or Aragon and the new world gold only rolled in consistently by the time of Philip II
You say charlemagne made a mistake dividing his territory but in truth dividing Austria from Spain saved Austria from spains disastrous policies against England and France
If you enjoyed this video, please like and leave a comment. It helps the channel a lot. Many thanks.
I'll be honest, your solo and scripted episodes are by far the best to me.
The main lesson here is that if you capture your main rival in battle, don't let him go.
Put him in a cage and carry him into battle a la Timurlane
Wrong. If you kill your enemies, they win.
By that point french nobility could have continued the war without him.
The exception being if you know your rival is self-destructive. After Manzikert, the Seljuks released Emperor Romanos IV, and were likely pleasantly surprised to see the Romans spiral into a civil war which would forever open Anatolia to the Turks.
Hello. I'm from Argentina. As a teenager, I went to a school that had a very strong nationalist-catholic-hispanist ideology. As such, the reigns of the Reyes Catolicos, Charles V (or I ) and Philip II were a very important part of our histoy classes. Also, the "what would happened if only..." was a very usual position.
Then i studied in a catholic university and these subjects were relatively relevant in the Modern History curriculum.
But i dont remember ever hearing about this abandonment of the "burgundian" strategy by Charles as a posible reason for the failure of his proyect.
I've been listening your streams for some weeks and i found them very informative.
Congratulations for your work
Despite being an Anglican, I actually wish mainland Europe had been United on a Christian empire. Europe had always torn itself apart rather then being conquered. The US didn’t conquer Europe, it collected the scraps of what was left after the war.
I speak Italian 🇮🇹 with the ambassadors, French 🇨🇵 with the women, German 🇩🇪 with the soldiers, English 🏴 with the horses, and Spanish 🇪🇸 with God ✝️
CHARLES V.
No, the quote is "German to the horses". He didn't speak English. I mean, why do you think Charles V would speak English?
@@felixheavier5478 His aunt was married to the English king (Katherine of Aragon) and his son Phillip married the English queen (Mary Tudor)
I appreciate how you dont dumb down the events for the masses and talk in detail for people interested and already familiar with the material
It's definitely frustrating that the overwhelming majority of historical content on RUclips is just summaries of broad events, the niche of detailed longform content absolutely needs more attention
@@austin-9132honestly though, the condensing of history really serves a purpose too... think just how many young boys must become fascinated with history from something like "Kings and Generals". From there, there's all kinds of intermediate content to pretty advanced like "mlaser history"... come to think of it, RUclips history may be a good example about how a so-called "free market" innovates, discovers niches and provides utility.
But overall, I agree... immense value from longform like AM. The real meaning of history is revealed in these details.
What a great channel. Gonna be a patrician member as soon as I get on my computer. Thank you for your contribution to this community of nerds
Enough to make a man weep for what could have been.
😔
The historical fiction novel Ascanio by Alexander Dumas shows Francis I making a similar mistake when Charles traveled through French territory. Francis made Charles promise that Francis would receive Milan but didn't even ask Charles to put anything in writing because he believed his word was enough. In Ascanio, Francis is portrayed as the idealist obsessed with chivalry while Charles is the more machievelian one.
More, more, more!
Cheers & God Bless
What a nice surprise, thanks AM. Quite detailed but enjoyable and interesting. So will re listen.
Ahhh wonderful, time to spend a few minutes enjoying some good history this evening.
What an incredible lecture 🔥
Second and only 36 minutes late, not executing luther and trusting Francis I.
With Spanish colonies in Mexico, it was first empire that the sun never sets
Tour de force!
Excellent lecture, cheers.
One thing I alway like avout AM is doesn't let time, but rather the subjectatter dictate the length of his shows
I am not crying
Warm Greetings, Everyone!
Really like the thematic Essays
His biggest mistake was that he didn't send Martin Luther to jail in Worms when he could
So he should have acted like the emperor Sigismund at the Council of Constance(early 1400's) that gave czech reformer Jan Hus safe conduct to the council but then reneged and had him burnt at the stake!? Church had to be reformed otherwise Europe would have gone into a steep decline.
Oit of the four cointries France, Castille, Austria and Burgundy in EU4. I would choose Burgundy.
Also, illustrates cannot trust the French.
@@ScareWest 'All bad ideas come from France!' Sir David Starkey
@@ScareWest unless you play as Portugal, then you should ally France to colonize everything and make the whole map blue.
@@admontblanc But I want the continent and new world.
Very good lectiure session as always
I love this channel
Thank you Apostolic majesty.
Great work. I wish he succeeded.
Godspeed AM
Too good for this world.
Wouldn't Ferdinand still have been chosen as king of the romans instead of Charles' son? Even if Charles achieved his strategy, Ferdinand is still more popular with the princes of the empire.
First the hens, then the dogs went absolutely berserk, so I'll have to give this a couple more goes. I'm prone to the "just imagine if..." urge when reading, discussing, writing and listening to analysis of history. Braver for a few more minutes here, head screwed on better there and a bit luckier with this and that...
I would be shocked if you had no interest in publishing this in a professional journal, if you havent already.
+1
Comment for the algorithm
I do appreciate your presentations but what of the impact of and by 'the tribe"?
He can't talk about them here very much or else he may loose his channel.
What? The jews convinced Charles to move to Madrid? Touch some grass
the right really needs to clear your lot out.
@@blah7956 absolute nutjobs
Also I thought the Netherlands provided much more income then Castile or Aragon and the new world gold only rolled in consistently by the time of Philip II
The port of Antwerp in Flanders provided seven times more money than the New World provided to Spain.
You say charlemagne made a mistake dividing his territory but in truth dividing Austria from Spain saved Austria from spains disastrous policies against England and France
i hate that this clickbait worked
Not sure what’s going on here, but I’ll pass.
He traded Burgundy for the New World. An excellent trade, because Burgundy devoured every dynasty who tried to reign it.