100 kph is 62 mph. So this would do 4.9 0-60 stock, how is that slow for a 477lbs 900 twin? You do know this bike is heavily restricted because of emissions too right? With a filter, exhaust, and fuel controller, they're making 69-70 rwhp on premium. That's as much as a stock MT-07 and SV-650. Stock is around 58-60 rwhp. You want a faster one, pay $3000 more for a Speed Twin, it's that simple.
![Triumph SPEED 400 vs 900 vs 1200 [QuickTest#36]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QZQmoGnAriI/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautiful bike, good performance
Where are your other videos? Have you sold your street twin?
I can’t believe how fast it looks to me in my view
it feels so much faster than 5.12s when you're the one on the bike
Street twin model 2019+ has increase 10 ps from this video
Kindly make a video on top speed
Hi gokul, top speed is approximately 170kmh = 105mph, its not so much because of the 55HP but torque offsets on HP :)
What is the top speed
About 100 mph/160 kph. May be able to go faster tho.
That seems slow, how are you timing this?
Is this a 900cc?
@@jonnythekid8167 It is a 900(probably 865) and I wouldn't say it's slow, but it's definitely not optimal.
It's not a sports bike. It can keep up with an r3 though.
100 kph is 62 mph. So this would do 4.9 0-60 stock, how is that slow for a 477lbs 900 twin? You do know this bike is heavily restricted because of emissions too right? With a filter, exhaust, and fuel controller, they're making 69-70 rwhp on premium. That's as much as a stock MT-07 and SV-650. Stock is around 58-60 rwhp. You want a faster one, pay $3000 more for a Speed Twin, it's that simple.
On ne te voit plus sur le forum :)
Belle moto même si je préfère une Guzzi v7lll
my Dream
triumph street scrambler 0 a 100
ruclips.net/video/1Oqu5tCK-8w/видео.html this royal enfield interceptor is actually faster than this street twin then
That RE was modified, & still need 30s to achieve 180. Sorry but for me, i rather choose this stock street twin