I start a (BSc Hons) in Forensic Psychology this October . As a X criminal and also a hard working Plasterer my self and with studying Psychology as a passion for over 10 years. I have lived the Physical Experience that most younger Students have not. I have been reborn. It is my Version of BREAKING GOOD.
The topic isn't boring but she presents like a 8th grader. As this is supposed to give the students a good first impression, she shouldn't have had this class. That's a University and everyone presenting should have a certain level of ability to present well.
No. No slack for a PhD who can't say, "field" instead of, "feud" or says, "...who wants to become a police", or who uses that childish, pretentious affect so common in Californians, and whose sole perspective on forensic psychology is from defending the accused and avoiding conflict with those who are guilty. She put it out there, and if she is not mature enough to own it, then she needs the ridicule and derision. A forensic psychologist has, by the nature of the work, to be secure, confident and competent because the attorneys on the other side of the issue are going to eat her alive in a courtroom or judge's chambers. As to your comment about if it's boring, then don't watch...how the actual fuck is someone to know that BEFORE watching? CalSouthern needs to know the common, popular opinions of the videos they publish in order to improve. You are a moronic snowflake. She is not being bullied in the comments and does not need your pity. Take a course in logic and rationality, there are lots of free resources!
@@pugilemoltobene3708 she strikes me as being the type possibly more apt for applied psychology as opposed to teaching. I had mandatory therapy sessions and the guy Dr was a lizard shaped robot like me and was sooo not reaching the other patients as well as the lady Dr who had a more intimate approach.
Honestly, this is very interesting. I've watched a lot of forensic psych docs. and those docs. felt like they were filled with fillers. This video is straight to the point with a great explainations and I like that. Thank you, for sharing.
This field is easier because your dealing more with court rooms, motives, assessing, etc.. you have to be a pretty dominant lady to deal with criminals though. It's a unique field, it's not like working at walmart. My main interest in this field is, "Why?" and the backround of the killer, i'd get paid for this lol.
39:05 - Uhh, there's some problems here. I mean, there are problems seemingly everywhere in forensic psych, but holy god: If the prevailing wisdom in Forensic Psych is that Group Therapy for sex offenders is good because it allows the offenders to shame other offenders and feel better because "at least I'm not as bad as that guy", then that seems like Forensic Psych applied to criminal recovery is ran by someone who is stuck in 1950's incompetency. Or someone who sees benefit in that system failing and creating more criminals...woof CBT seems chill and good though, but it still has an odd aspect of WHO gets to determine WHAT is normalized...
if police applicants are psychologically assesed during the hiring phase, how did those cops who's trigger happy and abusive towards citizens pass the psychological test??
I'm sure this occurs AFTER they've become officers and the power they feel makes some act that way. I'm pro- police but I'm sure the feeling of being a cop and the things they see and go through definitely contribute to somes downfalls.
Because there are literally hundreds of thousands of police officers and even if these psychological tests are 99.9% accurate that would still be enough of the "Bad" police candidates getting through, and to allow idiots to think the country is filled with "trigger happy" cops when in reality it is a small portion of the law enforcement community.
That's like asking if most people are educated, some even to doctoral levels, why are they still stupid? Why some sick people don't get better even after visiting doctors many times? Nothing is perfect, let alone psychological assessments. Also, as above comments said, some of these police may change AFTER they became police. Also, there are many factors involved when recruiting people. Office politics & nepotism may enter the scene.
Noticed that a lot of the critical comments were from women. Jealous much? It's just an intro lecture about forensic psych. Cut the teacher some slack. The level of critique everyone is doing is ridiculous.
It's certainly not! There are plenty of older people who back to school and go into the career they want. It's not too late, you just need to stay motivated and not give up :)
hmmm...so she doesn't explain advocacy vs expert roles. The roles are vastly different and very important - puts to rest a lot of misconceptions, too! This statement, 'My dissertation chair can tell you exactly the background of the killer...'. Sometime we can! Profiling is probability. Hopefully, she gains her pedagogic traction soon - no doubt she's a subject matter expert, but her ability to convey her deliverables needs to improve.
Worst speaker ever. I don't feel she's professional and she doesn't convey that she has an educated understanding of what she's talking about. I don't feel she gives the respect due to mental illness. She has very set ideas that she regurgitates and just feels very judgmental... something that doesn't bode well for stigma or treatment. This is an example of what angers me about the field.
I start a (BSc Hons) in Forensic Psychology this October . As a X criminal and also a hard working Plasterer my self and with studying Psychology as a passion for over 10 years. I have lived the Physical Experience that most younger Students have not. I have been reborn. It is my Version of BREAKING GOOD.
I think its her first time teaching. Guys cut her some slack, she probably just isn't used to it. And if you think its boring then don't watch it.
The topic isn't boring but she presents like a 8th grader. As this is supposed to give the students a good first impression, she shouldn't have had this class. That's a University and everyone presenting should have a certain level of ability to present well.
No. No slack for a PhD who can't say, "field" instead of, "feud" or says, "...who wants to become a police", or who uses that childish, pretentious affect so common in Californians, and whose sole perspective on forensic psychology is from defending the accused and avoiding conflict with those who are guilty. She put it out there, and if she is not mature enough to own it, then she needs the ridicule and derision. A forensic psychologist has, by the nature of the work, to be secure, confident and competent because the attorneys on the other side of the issue are going to eat her alive in a courtroom or judge's chambers.
As to your comment about if it's boring, then don't watch...how the actual fuck is someone to know that BEFORE watching? CalSouthern needs to know the common, popular opinions of the videos they publish in order to improve. You are a moronic snowflake. She is not being bullied in the comments and does not need your pity. Take a course in logic and rationality, there are lots of free resources!
Chill pandit. aside from Rob and Craig she has a pretty good like to dislike ratio.
As a professional in the field, I can tell you she needs a mentor and serious help with delivery.
@@pugilemoltobene3708 she strikes me as being the type possibly more apt for applied psychology as opposed to teaching. I had mandatory therapy sessions and the guy Dr was a lizard shaped robot like me and was sooo not reaching the other patients as well as the lady Dr who had a more intimate approach.
Honestly, this is very interesting. I've watched a lot of forensic psych docs. and those docs. felt like they were filled with fillers. This video is straight to the point with a great explainations and I like that.
Thank you, for sharing.
mehhhh... maybe...???
This field is easier because your dealing more with court rooms, motives, assessing, etc.. you have to be a pretty dominant lady to deal with criminals though. It's a unique field, it's not like working at walmart. My main interest in this field is, "Why?" and the backround of the killer, i'd get paid for this lol.
I am the same way I want to understand the reason “why?” And the way the killer thinks.
An attractive forensic psychologist. I have now seen everything.
It is an INTRODUCTION. I think this would be great for any person thinking of this as a career.
This gave me a good idea about this field. I’m interested in going into this field
I am about to study Forensic Psychology this had a lot of helpful info thank you 🙏
Do you mind sharing how it's going? Interested in this field too.
Can someone recommend any intermediate/advanced videos for forensic/legal psychology? All I’m finding are introductionary videos.
I'm going into psychology studies as a transfer student, this course is going to be fun however it's a lot of work, I'm aware.
I’m including this in final for Forensic Evidence; Forensic Psychology was aspect not covered in course. Thank you.
39:05 - Uhh, there's some problems here. I mean, there are problems seemingly everywhere in forensic psych, but holy god:
If the prevailing wisdom in Forensic Psych is that Group Therapy for sex offenders is good because it allows the offenders to shame other offenders and feel better because "at least I'm not as bad as that guy", then that seems like Forensic Psych applied to criminal recovery is ran by someone who is stuck in 1950's incompetency. Or someone who sees benefit in that system failing and creating more criminals...woof
CBT seems chill and good though, but it still has an odd aspect of WHO gets to determine WHAT is normalized...
if police applicants are psychologically assesed during the hiring phase, how did those cops who's trigger happy and abusive towards citizens pass the psychological test??
I'm sure this occurs AFTER they've become officers and the power they feel makes some act that way. I'm pro- police but I'm sure the feeling of being a cop and the things they see and go through definitely contribute to somes downfalls.
Because there are literally hundreds of thousands of police officers and even if these psychological tests are 99.9% accurate that would still be enough of the "Bad" police candidates getting through, and to allow idiots to think the country is filled with "trigger happy" cops when in reality it is a small portion of the law enforcement community.
clarence trotter kind of makes you wonder.. exactly WHO and why are these kind of personalities selected for law enforcement...!
That's like asking if most people are educated, some even to doctoral levels, why are they still stupid?
Why some sick people don't get better even after visiting doctors many times?
Nothing is perfect, let alone psychological assessments. Also, as above comments said, some of these police may change AFTER they became police.
Also, there are many factors involved when recruiting people. Office politics & nepotism may enter the scene.
Very interesting 👏
Noticed that a lot of the critical comments were from women. Jealous much? It's just an intro lecture about forensic psych. Cut the teacher some slack. The level of critique everyone is doing is ridiculous.
why are u including gender jeez
Very informational...
52:45 why thank you, I was just thinking that I didn't need these ear drums anymore.
not even a minute in, i feel as if she's not interested, knowledgeable, or confident. NEXT >>
studders and stammers she seems new at lectureing
trying to keep my composure :)
Is 48 to old become a psychologist if you’ve never even taken a physiology class and you don’t know anything about law?
It's certainly not! There are plenty of older people who back to school and go into the career they want. It's not too late, you just need to stay motivated and not give up :)
"I can look at dead bodies if I want" "hood" "cholos" 🤣🤣🤣
sorry about spelling
Good Lord. Somebody give this woman a tissue.
Pretty basic. Very nice introduction, but she stutters too much... it's a little annoying... I give the video 1 of 2 thumbs up
hmmm...so she doesn't explain advocacy vs expert roles. The roles are vastly different and very important - puts to rest a lot of misconceptions, too! This statement, 'My dissertation chair can tell you exactly the background of the killer...'. Sometime we can! Profiling is probability. Hopefully, she gains her pedagogic traction soon - no doubt she's a subject matter expert, but her ability to convey her deliverables needs to improve.
Domestic abuse ????
I'm sorry. but I was really listing to what she was saying, she is so distracted oh my god.
Worst speaker ever. I don't feel she's professional and she doesn't convey that she has an educated understanding of what she's talking about. I don't feel she gives the respect due to mental illness. She has very set ideas that she regurgitates and just feels very judgmental... something that doesn't bode well for stigma or treatment. This is an example of what angers me about the field.
She's hot. Your argument is invalid.
Jk. Agreed. She sounds like she killed the real doctor and stole her identity.
Wow pretty
You need to take some teaching classes, lady.
"Um...um...um..."
I'm pretty sure if you're in a room full of people for the first time you'd be the same
Dores not know to do presentation, boring
it would be a lot more interesting if she had less clothing on. a lot less,
That was my only thought throughout this whole video.
You shouldn't sexualize her shes just doing her job
you’re disgusting
thats why it is reasonable to hate men. u should be kept in a cage if that's all you thought of to comment under this video