Is he talking about two theoretical model species? Because he draws conclusions rather hastily. I thought evolutionary biologists were much more careful.
@@chriseronyI was thinking more of variations within one species. How about the spotted hyena? If your point is that this is the exception, I have a feeling you have a second point to make?
Love this guy!! I've watched some other presentations of his and he is one of the smartest people I've seen!!
Really loved the class professor!
Proves what I've been saying all along: the ideal male specimen is in fact, a femboy
They love it
Trivers 1972: Parental investment and sexual selection
Other good reads for the subject are Andersson 1994: Sexual Selection and Bateson 1983: Mate Choice.
For me this guy is Jordan Peterson 2.0
Nah Jordan Peterson sucks
Science ‼️💯🔥✊♥️
It's not actually female who choose dominant male. Those males are more likely to dominate female without their consent.
Is he talking about two theoretical model species?
Because he draws conclusions rather hastily. I thought evolutionary biologists were much more careful.
They must be a theoretical model, I think. What about aggressive smaller or passive large men?
@@coreycox2345 can you give an example of a species with males who are smaller than female and are highly aggressive/competitive?
@@chriseronyI was thinking more of variations within one species. How about the spotted hyena? If your point is that this is the exception, I have a feeling you have a second point to make?
So that's why there's so many lesbians