Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
5 Reasons Why V-Ray is the best Render Engine for 3ds Max
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2021
- Get "V-Ray 5 Masterclass: Your Complete Guide to V-Ray for 3ds Max" From here:
gum.co/VRayMas...
Corona for 3ds Max Course: gum.co/FbKNsy
Arnold for 3ds Max Course: gum.co/Pbdyiq
Our Weebsite: mographplus.com/
Our Gumroad Store: gumroad.com/mo...
Our Newsletter: bit.ly/368mbxA
Our Facebook: / motiongraphicplus
Our Twitter: / mographplus
i bought the vray 3 course back then, can recommend the guide is really worth its money.
what about Nested Dielectrics in Vray? Its possible?
I have some doubt about SSS (foliage and snow) in Vray in compare to Corona but I respect your opinion, Thanks for your great tutorials (Vray user here)
I also used 3ds max
Good software
I most often use blender but teach 3dsmax at the uni and I have to say out of the box vray is hard to beat, especially with interior scenes. However cycles is also CPU and GPU capable with no difference in the render result between the two, in fact you can render using both CPU and GPU at the same time. Vray in blender would be a dream,
I have been using vray since vray 1.0.4 to date and found this engine always better than all alternative out there but recently I started using Octane and I was blown away by the speed and quality. Despite all the cons of GPU specific engines I found Octane better than vray interms of speed and quality it's more artist friendly and targeted for quick look dev.
Yes, both vray an arnold are better, but they are slower.well, I would rather choose speed vs quality... red,octane and even corona are much faster.II think that the quality argument is overrated.I mean it isnt night and day diffrence.
I prefer corona over vray
But
Sometime vray had advantages against corona
So I compare both with render engine
With interior and exterior
Models were ready so I had to just texture them from start and render
Interior (cpu render i7 10th gen 8core)
Vray worktime 1H 20m
Render time 43.14 minutes
Corona 8 interior
Corona worktime 56 minutes
Render time 31.08 minutes
Exterior
Vray 5
Work time 45 minutes at both render engine
But render time
Vray 5 - 34.05 minutes
Corona 8 - 52.01 minuts
@@chetanfanse9270 Interesting finds
For what i do, Indigo Render is the best render engine, it simply covers all my needs.👍
Arnold crashed on GPU with my assets.
Vray boots up much faster and does not crash. Also did not experience slowdowns yet like I did with Arnold.
Interior scenes with Arnold........................................ still waiting to finish, Vray really fast. I turned around and boom done.
Vray used to be a pain compared to Arnold but that is not the case anymore. It is just as easy to use as Arnold. I think.
I have 1 rtx 2070.
Fully agree with you
Ouch! Man, ACES was really a strong argument... Is it expected in next Corona version as well?
@Illia Havrylov same developer (or rather owner of both) so maybe it won't take that long. Although, the user database might demand it first before they implement ACES. And since Corona is used mostly in archviz, I don't see big profits of ACES there. Just my opinion ofc.
If you are using corona then tell me is it better than arnold?
Should I try it??
@@aryaman3083 sorry, can't say anything about Arnold - never worked with it, but in our studio we switched to V-Ray recently, due to Corona's problems with large scenes first of all.
@@antonvoloshin9833 totally agree with ya, the huge amount of rams requirement are corona problem.
WE NEED VRAY 5 FOR C4D COURSE PLEASEEE
Vray WAS the best engine.....till CORONA-R has been emerged😎
in which regard corona is better than v-ray ?
@@alligatoralligator in that regard that it is easy to use for noobs
No way corona is 2 times slower than vray
Corona still doesn't support ACES and lacks render elements for more complex compositing. So while it is easy to get into and it's at least for now great for archviz, Vray Arnold and Unreal all use ACES by default and have more flexibility in post for complicated live action and post processing in gamma 1.0.
If you are just doing archviz for low end then it won't make a difference, bit for high end and vfx it falls a bit flat, and I can always spot Corona for having that limited dynamic range when looking at interior visualizations with exteriors because of it.
@@kimmysander2447 In gen8 they added ACES(auto) in the PostPro window... but it is still in its preliminary stages and needs more development!
Corona render is the best
what about arnold ? which engine has the highest quality and the most photorealistic renders ?
They are all ferrari's. But are you Michael Schumacher? That's the point.
Render Engines doesnt matter but pc engine does
Arnold has the highest quality materials and shaders. It's slower because of this very reason (though definitely not slow, especially on GPU). We've compared it against V-ray and Redshift and Octane. It still comes out on top for usability and quality. And getting materials auto-assigned using Operators expressions (perfect for Houdini workflow) saves us many hours per week.
i don’t agree with guys who say render engines don’t matter and they are all the same, for example i can’t find a render comes out from blender cycles that looks so photorealistic, especially with materials that contain subsurface scattering , translucent .. etc. like human skin it looks more plasticy and not realistic, on the other hand i see incredible renders come out from arnold and vray in the artstation for example.
@@vitocorleone5080 I don't agree either. For my taste atm Renderman and Arnold produce very let's say photorealistic images. I can't say that about Redshift or Octane though.
tnx it was useful
I'm 3dsMax user and I still prefer Arnold over V-Ray easy.
Scanline is the best!
I used only the scanline, and sometimes the included advanced lighting plugins lightracer or lightscape radiosity, back in 2007 with max 8, when I stopped my activity, and I used sometimes hundreds standard lights for my scene haha
@@zdenekburian1366 :)
youre a hipster
It's good, but it's not Arnold good.
Depends on what you doing. Arnold is not the best for archviz, it's better suited for heavy VFX.
is the best for C4D too
Octane
You don´t talk about finalRender at all?
I'm a 3ds Max user & I will take Arnold over V-Ray anytime not even close!
Feel free to show us your shitty renders as well.
I'm interested to hear why. Can you elaborate?
@@bgtubber Well based on my years of experience with V-Ray I can finally say Arnold Renderer is the one for me don't get me wrong I still love V-Ray but Arnold is way more efficient and It makes way more sense when you start working with it It's very hard to explain everything here but you can try it and see for yourself, this is purely my own opinion.
@@fahadal-asmari6893 Interesting. Thanks for sharing!
Around is sure efficiency for material settings, but it takes too much times to render, and the gpu of Arnold is suck to render the sequence.
Interesting accent, I wonder where you’re from
Kansas
Bit ram hungry.
Tío, pareces un robot hablando, coge aire de vez en cuando, entona la frase, haz pausas, cambia algo hombre... llevo 1 minuto y medio escuchándote y tienes un no sé qué que cansa pero hasta a los árboles....