Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
A Sex Trafficking Law is Fundamentally Changing the Internet
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2020
- The controversial law aims to hold Big Tech accountable for its role, but free speech advocates are fighting it.
Subscribe to VICE News here: bit.ly/Subscrib...
Check out VICE News for more: vicenews.com
Follow VICE News here:
Facebook: / vicenews
Twitter: / vicenews
Tumblr: / vicenews
Instagram: / vicenews
More videos from the VICE network: www. vic...
Absolutely protect children and teens of both sex. But two consenting adults should be left to do as they wish, in the light of day or the dark of night. There will always be a need for sex workers. Forcing them underground will only cause more problems for everyone.
That’s why every state needs to legalize and regulate it.
It needs to be completely banned including Pornhub and all porn companies
As for "sex workers" its just a class to be wiped out
@Alana Weaver - Key word is 'pimps'. If authorities weren't so bogged down with prosecuting consenting adults, imaging how many resources could be freed up for actual victimization cases...
@@josephstalin9357 what if i said sex for everyone? Hmm? Communism?? Happy chemicals???
Of course the State should protect children and teens. However, since when prohibiting something like drugs, pornography, alcohol or prostitution has ever worked? If an adult wants to be a sex worker, he should have the right for being it. Paternalistic laws are only favourable to mafias and criminals. We should have laws that protect sex workers, not laws that leave them on the streets at risk.
We need to makje it legal, safe and taxable we need to ruin the money angle for those who use others for profit!
@@toriladybird511 *decriminalize not legalize.
Protecting people from sex trafficking is important. No one should ever be forced into sex work. Personally, I am of the opinion that most sex work should be legal, taxed and regulated.
Do what Germany and Holland had done. legalizing adult prostitution and the police can have greater power to go after the criminals because the crooks would stick out like a sore thumb on the internet.
Exactly. Like they’re wasting resources on what’s really real! Child trafficking
What these "anti trafficking" advocates don't say, is that they are also and primarily against adult prostitution and would love to see adult sex workers in jail.
Sadly there's still not enough checks to make sure the working girls ARE genuinely working willingly or forced!
Tori Ladybird yup! Sadly
@@toriladybird511 removing criminalization of sex work is the prerequisite to putting those checks in place.
Sex work needs to be public and professionalized. Right now, sex traffickers and legitimate sex workers both have to operate in hiding whereas only one of them is actually doing something morally reprehensible.
This interviewer didn't ask any pressing questions. I don't care what the lawyer thinks her opponents are saying about her behind her back, I want to know what she thinks about the fact that sex workers are saying that their lives are put in danger from the legislation she puts forth.
Exactly
maybe I missed something but how would a change in the law stop an adult from talking to an underage girl on Facebook to lure them into sex work?
Facebook's Big Brother could literally send a message to the kid's parents. Like we just ignore the fact they know everything about us 😂
It doesn't.
For the most part, sex trafficking victims and sex workers were against this law. The people in favor of it are mostly lawyers and religious groups who wanted a new legal tool for taking down cultural opponents.
It doesn't halt adults from talking to underage girls on Facebook but it can put Facebook liable if they knew and didn't do anything to prevent it, by changing the complete immunity of section 230 there's an incentive for the company to monitor and prevent such things from happening, the incentive is not losing money by being fined or sued.
@@neeneko Sex trafficking victims were against this law? Yeah? Like all those children locked up in some f**king pedophiles dungeon are cool with the status quo? WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
@@bubblesman1998 Amazed to find someone talking sense in this comment section, hard to believe these comments are from Vice subscribers.
When was this filmed? Everyone’s shaking hands, not wearing masks, and hanging out around lots of people.
hmm
This was probably shot before March when the pandemic hit
That's what you got outta this??
Im thinking towards the end of last year. Everybody is wearing jackets and sweaters... its scorching hot here now
This occurred in Texas so maybe this morning? Lol but probably the first month or so of the year
I don't really understand the cross section with the adult sex work world here. Sex work and child trafficking are too vastly different things. The problem with this bill is that it is too broadly written and directly affects sex worker without hurting child traffickers very much.
I'd argue to decriminalize and regulate sex work while holding tech companies liable for illegal content with financial incentives such as fines. We fine companies for polluting into a river, why not do the same for tech companies?
This really seems less of a concern for children and more of a concern for cultural targets and to silence free speech on the internet. There's nothing wrong with sex work between consenting adults and that has nothing to do with child trafficking.
It definitely sounds like they are using the child sexual abuse as a red herring for abolishing sex work. If someone opposes the bill they can just yell what about the children and it's a slippery slope.
So the first part is about kids, then we dive to adult issues. Such a broad topic. Obviously protect kids but, if an adult wants to be a legal sex worker go!
@Pixel Smile lmao and what are you? Trolls are a waste of space 😂 how does it feel to hate yourself sooo much that you TRY to hurt people over the internet? 🎤 dont worry. I'll wait 😂😁
@@blahblahbleh3178 I feel that. These children are groomed into it. Fake ID isnt difficult to come by. When they are in a hostel who is gonna check behind those doors for ID. There are much safer ways to provide sex and company for cash. First drug tests, sanitized areas, STD tests, but that would cost too much. And are the employers going to pay for health care? Birth control? How much will the worker be responsible for providing while needing to pay lot regulation fees and rental fees or pap smears and hygiene products... so I dont see it being legitimately safe for children when we wouldnt really keep the adults safe in this business
It's a medium for communicating. The users are committing the crime. Should phone companies be liable for crimes discussed over their network?
Exactly. This makes no sense. Any platform can be used to commit a crime. Should all platforms be liable?
lol these accusers are so stupid. Might as well sue pc and phone companies for making phones for traffickers
Listen clowns phone and tech companies operate on two different platforms.Tech Companies are mostly SM or Social Media.As such they have a social responsibility towards their community.
I believe they are that is why they hand over records. If they refused to hand over records they would be held responsible.
@carolina hernandez These edgelords aren't gonna listen to reason.
I love Antonia! Such a great reporter!
What these "anti trafficking" advocates don't say, is that they are also and primarily against adult prostitution and would love to see adult sex workers in jail.
@@user-ny7tt8my1r prostitution will never end bro. Enjoy pretending to live in Disneyland.
@Anonymous Panacea not always, when it is voluntarily and consensual it's not wrong, it's peoples judgement of it that makes it wrong. Sex is not a bad thing, neither is some forms of sex work. And criminalizing it makes it more dangerous for everyone involved.
What
@Jjjj Jjjj I usually see that's not true. Conservative women also want the prostitutes incarcerated, they just don't say it in public.
As much as I'm for mitigating and preventing sex trafficking, this is just the counter intuitive way to go, you can't expect large companies to actively police their own forums with countless moderators seeping through countless messages to detect possible sex trafficking.
That’s the point !!!! So now a days to be in any tech job or the industry period, you should be liable for all your content including paying guards to guard your tech enterprise. They make enough money time to hit there wallets and see what kinda company they become! It must be ok for companies to run nuclear waste into our rivers right? Also they shouldn’t be responsible for the river or the life that inhabited that river before the corporate enterprise ever was a spec of thought. Doesn’t make sense at all man.
I think if a company has enough money it will just find a loophole that will fail to protect anyone and cost them the least amount of money
Danielle Danielle what if we had A.I. Sit down and learn the whole library of Law? Think about it for a second. If we had it study we could use that Intelligence to crack down on data from corporate enterprise. It would know the laws in and out best attorney money can or could buy
The social media companies know everything about their users, and a lot about people who have never even signed up. Certainly if they can track on that scale, they can manage to keep an eye out for overt displays of illegal activity. I'm sure some very subtle or coded discussions may slip by, not because the companies can't figure it out but because they are too lazy to, but at least the adverts and agencies would be snuffed out.
Did you know that Mike Tyson once offered a zoo attendant 10,000 dollars to let him fight a gorilla. They turned it down for safety.
Did you know once a dude turned into a pickle and killed alot of rats.So funny 😄
But I don’t know the name
Even growing up from a child to a teenager, my body was constantly changing doesn’t mean I understood what was going on.
Also that did not mean that some freak old weirdo have any rights to bother me. Adults need therapy to end this mentality that sex on children should be abolish just like slavery!
End sex trafficking and end child marriages!
Stop damaging children, they are human beings! Humanity needs to be restored!
This was probably filmed a while ago. I don't think VICE would show the NYPD in a positive light now and there are no COVID precautions. Otherwise, good on reporting. I liked seeing both sides of this complicated issue.
I feel like its a money grab for these lawyers...going after big tech for ITS USERS committing crimes....Lawyers are money hungry, and sex trafficking has to be one of the worst crimes, and i truly feel for them, but these people or LAWYERS DONT CARE..THE RICH TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE POOR'S MISFORTUNE...Way it is, and always will be.
of course it's a money grab. lawyers will sue anyone for any reason. how many of these "sex-trafficking victims" were ever actually trafficked? requiring the websites to verify identity and age is understandable because yes, some of them were underage, but the majority are over 18 and are doing it because they're ok with it. how many of these "victims" simply found out about this lawsuit and said what the lawyers wanted to hear so they can eventually get a check? this whole narrative that sex workers are all being forced into it is complete bullshit. i have a few friends that work as escorts. they don't have pimps, aren't drug addicts, and aren't being forced to do it in the slightest. they are comfortable providing their services, screen their clients carefully, and make a lot of money. nobody is running around saying that strippers are all being forced to dance nude, and yes, some strippers dance because they have issues like drug addiction, but most of them would rather stripping than being a waitress. bottom line here: these lawyers don't give a damn about the actual "issues" real or fabricated. if they really wanted to solve this issue they would be advocating for legalization so the real victims could get help without fear of being putting in jail. legalization would also weed out underage sex workers because there would be a verification system, STD testing, and maybe even licensing (like Nevada has in place).
I don't think the problem lies on the companies, but rather the parents who aren't teaching their kids how to stay safe online.
Unfortunately that is under the assumption that all parents care about their kids...in reality a lot of those sex trafficked victims were SOLD by their parents.
Most children that are trafficked come from broken homes and families. They are easy prey for the traffickers, usually from poor families. If they take a rich family's kiss, the news would be all over it. Poor kids, they're labeled as runaways.
I approve the idea of having companies being responsible for their user's content and how they use the platform.
But how can a tech company enforce this 100% without accidentally catching false positives? (RUclips's DMCA service does this automatically all of the time and it's anything but perfect)
This is why you see tech companies fighting back. Yes it can be done, but it won't be perfect, and if anything could cause serious issues (for both the company and the user) that'll lead to further litigation.
Too risky.
Yes there will be false positives.
But after a while the filters get better and better.
As a woman my filter for Ken who are "horny online" is simple.
They say hi
I say hi
They ask what are you upto?
First red flag if you know me you know my routine.
But I reply honestly. Probably watching a RUclips documentary cause of the plethora of information available.
I ask them... Knowing the answer 9/10 x
And Bingo!
"in bed bored"... (It's 3pm ffs)
. My answer oh you work nights?
Nah...
Oh OK well you have a nice nap!
I am 49 not that tech savy BUT I can figure out a horny guy from that.
"Prostitution or sex trafficking" Is the sentence that summarizes the issue. You will not help trafficking victims by forcing sex workers out of the light into dark corners where their customers will dare approach them, when prostitution is a crime, the people buying will become violent and dangerous.
A lot of people are saying we should let the adults do what they want. I would agree, except for the fact many or in some cases most of the adult prostitutes advertised online are trafficking victims. Being an adult doesn't mean you're doing this willingly. A lot of the women who appear in ads and are put for sale were trafficked from other countries, lured with promises of good jobs and opportunities. This is particularly true when it's Eastern European women and Asian women being prostituted in the West, though it can happen to women in their home countries as well. Even those who might enter prostitution willingly often end up controlled by a pimp or agency and have no autonomy or right to say no, and are given little of the money paid for them.
In counties or regions where prostitution is not legal, social media companies should be deleting accounts that post ads for prostitution, just as they should police their platform for ads for drugs or calls for violence. If they knowingly allow crime to be advertised and committed, they are responsible. In countries with legal prostitution, the tech companies could require the licensing information or other data to ensure the company or individual selling was legal and everyone involved willing. These companies make billions largely through exploiting their user's privacy. They know where you are and what you're doing. They can easily police their own sites and purge or report accounts linked to illegal or suspicious activity.
Lawyers will sue anyone for any reason. How many of these "sex-trafficking victims" were ever actually trafficked? Requiring the websites to verify identity and age is understandable because yes, some of the girls are underage, but the majority are over 18 and are doing it because they're ok with it. How many of these "victims" simply found out about this lawsuit and said what the lawyers wanted to hear so they can eventually get a check? This narrative that sex workers are all being forced into it is complete bullshit. I have a few friends that work as escorts. They don't have pimps, aren't drug addicts, and aren't being forced to do it in the slightest. They are comfortable providing their services, screen their clients carefully, and make a lot of money. Nobody is running around saying that strippers are all being forced to dance nude even though some strippers dance because they have issues like drug addiction. Most of them don't have a monkey on their backs and would simply rather stripping than being a waitress. The bottom line here: these lawyers don't give a damn about the actual "issues" real or fabricated. If they really wanted to solve this issue they would be advocating for legalization so the real victims could get help without fear of being putting in jail. Legalization would also weed out underage sex workers because there would be a verification system, STD testing, and maybe even licensing (like Nevada has in place).
We need two internets
The amount of child sexual abuse material on all of Facebook's platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram is appalling. They need to be held accountable.
Annie McAdam's determination is admirable however the noble frame of mind in today's society quite possibly will pretend ignorance and deny responsibility to Big Tech companies because the internet is the promising enabler that can be used for both good and evil. The innocence of the victims is what has been and will continue to be the honor of her cause, I do not feel that changes made to the internet will hinder those of us who want good to win over evil.
"Wait a minute the nuisance can argue in court." lol!
No internet till you're 18.
Agreed
It's so refreshing to see an unbiased coverage of an important topic.
Giving away all your privacy to catch predators is a bit much...bad enough google knows when im pregnant or when im buying a house. No one wants to be sex trafficked but sex trafficking doesnt start on fb. Sex trafficking starts in communities, your local businesses, and cultural acceptance taboos of these practices.
She making it seem like the companies are at fault for not screening every single account including reading everyones privates messages, etc. That is not right. You cannot do that. These platforms were not meant for kids and the parents allow these kids on these platforms and they don't monitor them while on these platforms. They don't even use the tools provided to them to better assist children safety.
Since they are open to children 13 and up, their are certainly meant for kids and need to be protected in the same way.
Wherever prostitution is legalized, trafficking goes up. As long as men want to purchase women for sex there will be misogyny and trafficking.
Child sex trafficking is a massive, multi billion dollar business each year. This lawsuit will lead the way for law enforcement to track down these criminals.
The fear is law enforcement abusing and overreaching the allowed parameters.
keep fighting the good fight... no way iz Zuckerberg gonna be found guilty of anything tho
Responsibility is everyones' job, it is precisily the derelict of that duty which contributes to the lack of compassion which leads to complicit behavior on all parties that produces all kinds of evil.
Hey FB, maybe you should spend less time censuring people's speech that you don't like and prevent sickos from preying on children! God's speed to this law team.
The platform isn’t bad it’s the people using it.
7:22 mouse on the screen appearing for a couple of seconds on the right.
It's called a Pointer ; ))
Trafficking and child prostitution obviously have to be banned. That said, not all sex work is bad. When it is consensual and in good conditions there is not really anything wrong with it outside of peoples judgement. It would be better for everyone to decriminalize it. And I don't say legalization. Because legalization comes with a lot of rules and paperwork and workplaces which are all things that require money and the most vulnerable sex workers don't have money and sometimes not even citizenship. So this creates a black and a white market in which the most vulnerable people are the ones that are still worst off. We need to start listening to people whom are actually affected by the laws around this.
Exactly. Decriminalize not legalize!!
I wonder how the trial went! Any updates? Great video, informative and shocking!
It just means that someone has to go in and construct the law more carefully. they chopped the block, now sculpt the figure.
ay but marble is difficult to work with.
Sex work should just be legalized.
This feels like the topic itself could easily be used as an excuse to further sensor the internet...
So Facebook needs to put up videos, and overlays. Warning you could be sex traffic. As well parents need to be competent attentive communicative not every parent will be. Facebook sucks but this sounds like the same Boogeyman bs like when I was young. Don't meet people online you're going to die. Parents which would be my age grew up with that and should be communicating about the dangerous of things that can happen not only online but in life. If a platform knows it is happening then they should be held accountable but the blame doesn't start at a social media platform. It starts with the parents
Parents don't take responsibility anymore, and I say this as a parent. I see it with plenty of people. Saw a kid spray antifreeze into his sisters face while the parents stood there and did nothing. Afterwards the mother blamed the manager for leaving the spray at the checkout instead of admonishing the kid, or ya know, keeping an eye on him.
I bought new devices this year due to a group of people stealing from me in San Dimas California and the new devices keep showing some type of interruption going thru the internet connection . I was child sex trafficked thru the phone line men calling asking for a Kathy's or Yvonne which were names of elder cousins I had residing in Baldwin Park California but these cousins didn't reside with us.
140 pediofiles still on the loose at this time.
At the end of the day, parents need to parent. Be aware of what your children are doing. Foster a good enough relationship so that there's trust between you and they share with you. I really hate to see that this affects harm reduction in circles that really need it, and that's honestly bullshit. I feel SO strongly abour harm reduction and could go on for ages about it's importance and the ripple effect across communities, but for what? 😒 Stay well & Stay safe, everyone. Thank you to the ladies shown here, and all other's who have participated in running harm reduction programs. You guy's are the best, and literal life saver's. 😊💖 *If ur someone seeking harm reduction services, or curious about the services, google ur city + "harm reduction", or the biggest city near you*.
Austin has the AHRC (Austin Harm Reduction Coalition). They have a website with their schedule. Not sure how the pandemic has affected them, but perhaps the website holds an update. If ur not one seeking services, you can also make donations to HR programs. There's usually info on their site, or u can directly ask. AHRC takes monetary donations, but also has an Amazon wishlist for goods they typically keep in rotation. Donate your time, even! (maybe when thing's are safer??) Save a Life. 🙂 (And wear a mask) XO💖
There is a hotel in Dallas to look at! Days Inn 3645 Leon Rd, Garland, TX 75041. They are trafficking there and the police department at the very least looks the other way!! I stayed there and woke up to a screaming in a room below mine, I forced the front desk to call the police and nothing came of it. I later heard from a local that the area has underground gambling, sex trafficking, and the police are in on the action!
she is fine as hell
lol which one? there's multiple "she's" 😅
@@mackenzieonyx7586 the interviewer
May God protect that lawyer🙏🏽
Thank you Trump Administration and congress for addressing child trafficking.
3:13 I hate when people make inferences about what a law "was" made for even if that isnt repesented in the law...
"If she's old enough to cross the street, she's old enough to get hit" - Jared Fogle 😂
ÔG Chris Watts #TheUltimateKarenSlayer #MVP#s #FOTY damn Chris, I thought you were in the clink. Or did you get out due to Covid like everyone else?
Wtf 🤣🤣
Jared is my daddy
First!
But seriously, where is everybody's masks?
Maybe it’s a pre covid 19 documentary that was cut but since they lack non covid content they released it now.
Any videos that show no one without masks, was recorded pre-COVID
You must have missed the fact that everybody was in a coat or a jacket
They don't work
The internet is out of control and clearly so is humanity smdh
"Facebook know that you're pregnant a week before you go to the doctor. Google know that you want a new house two weeks before you go to the realtor".
What does it means? Any proof to back that up?
They store most information on your searches on Google etc
@@senoow4215 yes, and then they know a gal is pregnant before she does because they "store most information etc"? I meant proof
They can track what communities you join, the vibes of the posts you make, and the searches for what educational materials you look for.
@@tylerphuoc2653 vibes are like pregnancy tests?
Every organization they catch there 5 more to.open . Too much money to organized. It will be with us for a long while !
The big thing is the process is iteratively shady. The goal of the change was to make things more dangerous for people on the other side of their culture war. So worse places openning isn't a bug, it is a feature, it makes the lives of people the backers do not like that much worse.
IF THE DEMAND WAS TARGETED, THE SUPPLY WOULDNT ALWAYS BE PROSECUTED
Wayfair
vortex ?
i'm conflicted. sex work is work, but child solicitation should be cracked down upon without any mercy.
How about America legalizes sex work, so this isn't an issue?
I believe in legalizing and regulating sex work for adults. And yes, child sex trafficking is wrong and we should stop it. However it seems that people are forgetting that children are not the only people being trafficked. It's not just child sex trafficking vs adult consensual sex work. It's all sex trafficking that's a problem.
"How do you all know each other?.. What's the connection between all of you at this table?"
Money.
Living through it all I can tell you Facebook is the reason to all of our downfalls
We should def make it ok to sue towns with prostitutes hanging out on their street corners. I mean, if drug dealers deal drugs in a town then the town is culpable too!
*Blooody hell. What a state. I'm sorry. Genuinely*
If you want to help the victims, legalize and regulate prostitution.
Yep. If these people really cared they would realize the problem is bigger than facebook.
The only reason it isn't legal is because of misplaced moral principles and religious institutions.
VejyMonsta yup the same religious institutions that are guilty of sexual abuse
I hope they look into wayfair
I'm really looking forward to the point where everyone finds out.. they just rip rich billionaires off 😂. I wouldn't be surprised if it is a money laundering op but the "they sell kids" has as much to it as Pizzagate did.
10:22 is selfish. Sex workers don't need condoms, but an education in managing their finances. On soft white underbelly they talk about how much they make. The make as much as top paid professionals and its tax free. Come on. Give them counselling too.
Where are these children's parents?
The lady fighting Fosta is Great 👏👏👏 if we legalize prostitution. The Black market kind that uses children will be easier to end
We NEED go protect children but this is tough because I’m not denying Facebook or Instagram isnt aware of who’s a predator or even providing ads for the sickos but where’s the parenting? Or safe internet coaching? Or increase in AI to act as defense?
Finally I can see Mark Fuckerburg hopefully in an orange jumpsuit
"technically providing harm-reduction services like providing food, and a condoms, and safety information to people who are trading sex at the street level could be construed as soliciting prostitution online."
there is absolutely no way that would ever be construed as soliciting prostitution (either online or in person). you're giving people food, condoms, and safety information not paying them for sex.. there's something else happening that she isn't talking about, because there's literally no reason why promoting a non-profit online would be a problem. furthermore, there is no way any law enforcement agency or district attorney would ever try to prosecute a group providing help to an at-risk community. why does vice just allow people to say whatever they want without challenging them to explain it?
The thing is the law changes from state to state a lot goes like " two people exchanging goods (not only money) for sexual services" so when you give some food to a sexworker it could still be interpreted as you trying to get with him/her + in some states there will absolutley be people who'll think you're doing the devils work by helping these people also scince it's illegal but no you're right they're prob just spewing bs and lying about how hard it is to help at risk people (only 'at risk because it's illegal) so they can feel better abt themselves right?
It's happened before and it'll happen again. It's supporting something illegal so that makes it illegal.
Going after anything and anyone. I hope they lose. Blame Facebook or social media for someone else that misused it. Thanks to these assholes like this more people will get more sent to fb jail
I don't and will not buy minor children a cell phone how my children got cell phones is a mystery🕵
4:00 that person, who really wants to get into "Jane Doe's Living Room" will find other ways to get there than facebook. I'm not saying that facebook should turn a blind eye, but to say it's facebooks fault isn't really improving the problem... even if you get it off facebook, it will just happen somewhere else. Maybe the best attempt at a solution would be to educate? So people know what to look out for?
I am happy someone is making a top down argument, which focuses less on punishing the victim and more on the facilitators. Going further, there needs to be a much greater target on the consumer. Many are surprised to know that the penalties for what is considered mild sexual offenses to a child (whatever tf that would be, as ALL sexual anything with a child is a major assault), carry relatively low sentences if any. The child or trafficked individual has a lifetime of scarring, while the offender may be a dot on a map for a few years. If the penalty for sex offenses against a child or trafficked person equated murder sentences (as they do kill a portion of their victims), the demand would go down greatly and lessen the supply. Anyone willing to give up their life to harm a child would deserve life in prison anyhow.
I wanted to work at the porn and/or prostitution industry. The only thing that prevents me is the law but in reality its my face.
Sue the telephone Co because of communication about illegal sex trafficking took place "on the platform" Censorship is coming SOON for better or worse ?? People have will and do perform sex acts for money married unmarried legal illegal People should have Freedom unless their is a "Compelling Reason to Legislate" FREEDOM
It's sad FOSTA SESTA still alive and kicking and section 230 is obsolete, throwing the baby out with the bathwater
This sure seems like a frivolous lawsuit. Wouldn't the next logical step be to attack phone companies or the usps for handling communication from child predators and victims? I have a really hard time believing she isn't in this for the money, but stranger things have happened.
Ohhhh the good ol' days of Craigslist & Backpage... How I miss them!
10:30 a wild L I C C has appeared
Omg hahahaha
good trump did what nobobdy would sing
Just gonna ignore everything Zach Sweers has done about this?
I want that lady as my lawyer!
She's the type of person I aim to be like. Fearless, professional
It would probably not end well for you. This woman is a leach, and I doubt her clients get much out of any wins she has. Fearless and professional perhaps, but a core of self serving opportunism.
May God bless this woman
Also you're internet CEO expert dude is wrong, glue is harmful but only when ingested, refrigerates are toxic and displace air but only in high concentrations and exposure. Electricity can be deadly but with safety standards created by industry that risk can be negated. Literally gas can be harmful but gas companies have created safety courses. Vice get better objective "experts" not a clear biased CEO who has profits from selling the exact progams that eliminated online privacy. Also him saying Tech has no financial incentive for policing there product shows clear bias when he has a incentive to sell programs to do that job for them. Really Vice you should feel ashamed and no you're standards are writing bias stories.
First person I thought of was Sauce Walka
I believe anyone under 18 years old should not have a personal social media account. While setting up an account you agree to Terms and Conditions ( Your data for access into a plat form) .Agreeing to terms is simply signing a contract, I don't think there a country in the world where conntracts signed by "children" are valid by Law.
1:55 Who knows if there is no traitor among those in the room, feeding the opponents with "fresh news"?
Yes, I know I sound like a freak. But if you want to deter criminals, you gotta think like them.
Get 👏🏼them 👏🏼 girl 👏🏼
You have to take a second, and realize that this is the oldest profession in the world, and wonder if it's a futile effort, you money hungry lawyers might scratch the surface, while making your wallets fatter off the victims and internet-based sites, but ultimately, I think it's literally banging your heads off the proverbial wall. 😧😳
RIP Tumblr.
Yo that round chick at the beginning is a tear!
This is all leading up to legalizing sex work.
10:00 Adults can handle their own selves. Kids can't. Oh fuckin well.
Plan and simple a online interface for sending messages of any kind can never convey the complexities of human language and criminalize parts of language removes due process. No employee or program can police social media well because of to many users, the way forward is kicking the DOJ, and law enforcement in the ads to pursue the people behind those accounts. How about for larger trained cyber crimes units and teaching the public internet safety through a national compagin.
1st amendment must be protected!
Yeah, maybe you need to adjust.
Who is the interviewer
Go Annie!