@@googboog3317 He's the guy that when you tell a dry sarcastic joke he immediately gets into the most serious argument with you when your both on the same side. Real nasty like.
This actually reminds me of a game played between Kramnik and Kasparov where Kasparov came at Kramnik with all guns blazing and Kramnik just forming a phenomenal coccoon only to spring out of it and delivering a knock out blow. This was an amazing game from Carlsen though.
@@JokerScribe I've seen the game when Capablanca playing King's Gambit sacrificed his Queen for two bishops. Here is only trading - not sacrifice. My last game playing black color I also sold my Queen : 1.e4 e5 2.d4 ed 3.Q:d4 Nc6 4.Qa4 Bc5 5.Bb5 Nd4 6.c3 Qf6 7.cd B:d4 8.Nf3 B:b2 9.e5 B:e5 10.Bg5 B:a1 11.B:f6 N:f6 ..... And my opponent lost that game after a few mistakes.
Dear Magnus, you you are my idol, I followed your footsteps and sacrificed queen today too. But I didn’t get anything in return and lost immediately. No problem, I’ll try again tomorrow.
Craaaaaazy. I love this era of chess we're in nowadays. The Classical World Championship games might be nearly all draws, but every other tournament is incredibly dynamic, with lots of sacs and computer-inspired h-pawn pushes. Great time to be a chess fan.
This feels supenatural. Even if 3 pieces for a queen is understandable, it just seems that magnus pieces are going to be really slow in the opening, he lets his knight gets dragged around the board to somehow find a safe haven on h4, he leaves the king in the middle, he sacrifices his d pawn to hinder whites attack...Magnus somehow broke almost every principle in this game and managed to come out on top. He also took by surprise one of the best preparator in the game on move 8. This is something else. I wonder if Magnus had this prepared or if he just felt invincible to try this.
Personally didn't see how Nd2 would be good in that situation. Forcing the knight to go to a7 or c7 by playing Qd3 or c4 would be miles better. f4 was also unsound. The whole idea behind the Nd2 move was to go to e4 and then cement the knight on d6. That variation would block the development of the light squared bishop almost indefinitely. But he didnt do that and and it allowed magnus to block the idea by playing d5. Anything after that is just a mess to analyze ngl HAHA
@@fahimp3 Engine evaluations assume the opponent will evaluate a position the same as the engine does. Since no human evaluates positions the same way, engine evaluations aren't particularly informative, especially in rapid play. Magnus is quite often behind in engine evaluation terms because he is forcing his opponent to make difficult choices and take risks which Magnus can take advantage of. This would be a poor strategy against an engine but is effective against fallible humans.
@@jrd33 I was speaking objectively, obviously not the practicalities of human play. Engines are used by GMs because of their objectivity (although not perfect) .
Magnus in 2021 showing us what relative pins can be sometimes, well...relative! Being so daring in challenging assumptions is one of the things I admire at Magnus. The fact that he does that and still win shows the mastery he achieved
Indeed Magnus is (one of) the greatest chess players of all time but I think it's maybe more relevant to put Magnus along with da Vincvi, Michaelangelo, Picasso as he undoubtedly is one of the greatest artists as well. A Masterpiece today Magnus.
Huh? It's difficult to compare players of different eras due to the way Elo works. We can only compare players to their player base. We can look at what games are the most aesthetically pleasing but to say who was better Magnus or Fischer etc isn't possible. We can have a personal preference but that's as much as we can know.
Many modern players absolutely mog Fischer. Modern players memorize everything that players of the past did as well as new things. The newer generation is always gonna be better than the previous, especially in chess.
@@sarban1653 it doesn't make them better at chess, since most of them are so talented "thanks" to the computer. Of course they're naturally really good at chess, but in my opinion, to say someone is better at chess than another, would mean they had the same stuff to train it to start with. Having a 3'600 Elo computer to prepare your games and learn the best moves is kind of cheat considering older players didnt have that, and couldn't even believe computers would ever be smarter than humans
@@bxriflexvv The advantage of modern technology makes them better even if it's "unfair". Being better is only about skill, not how you achieve it. You could argue that people from the past like Fischer are the most "talented" of all time, but that's different.
Giri is legend! I hate the draws but it's part of the game. If it means you score the points to stay in x tournament then playing for a draw is what is do too. Why risk a big L when you can guarantee the draw?
Actually here Magnus didn't lost his queen, he exchanged it for 3 pieces. If you lose the queen without gaining anything in return, then its useless to try and defend the position (unless your opponent is really bad)
I also analysed it and saw he missed the top moves 12-13 times. The last being beautiful checkmates. However game length was 50+ AND It's blitz, and insane complications. Dont get me wrong the man is a legend just wanted to clear its 13 instead of 3.
@@svetlinradoev9336 you're kind of right. But I checked the cloud analysis of lichess (high depth) and was surprised to see that he only made two inaccuracies after the sac. And even those inaccuracies is after he got a winning position (bringing down he's advantage from like -4 to -3... basically insignificant overall). I actually thought he made a lot more mistakes seeing that it's a complicated blitz game
I get u. But considering the complete lack of developed pieces you would be left with. It should still be considered a sacrifice imo. Like 3 or 4 top moves by Giri may have changed the outcome drastically.
Minor pieces are worth 3 points while the queen is worth 9. At best, they ended with level material after the exchange. However, the computer analysis gave Giri a strong advantage after the queen sac. Based on those facts I'd say that the argument for a queen sac is stronger.
Damn, even that i didnt watch that thing live, i was excited about whats going to happen next and it was a beauty of a game. Cannot wait for Agadmator to analyse the hell out of that masterpiece!!
I always tell ppl who criticise modern chess players and hail e.g 'the creativity of Tal' that it wouldn't work that way. These days, a Tal move would just be seen as a blunder. If he wins, his opponents clearly blunders back. Players are (and ppl expect them to be) better at taking advantage of dubious moves given enough time. Even here in blitz, you can see some aren't so impressed that Giri couldn't win, especially when they could see all the engine lines
Queen C7 at 7:30 would have changed the game completely. Black would have lost either Bishop or Rook (bishop if any other move than Knight A7, and if black plays Knight A7 then white Rook to D8 and check to get black Rook.
I found it very odd that even though they are in the same room, they are still playing on computers instead of facing each other at a real board. Amazing game though! Bra gjort, Magnus!
This is one of those sacrifices that needs concrete objectives. As a player, everything that is in the board should have a definitive purpose, no matter how precious the pieces are. When a player release that tension of losing something valuable in exchange for beautiful ending, that is how everything becomes real. I believe that knowing the principles is not enough, you'll have to have a mind of less worry and more thoughts. Good work Magnus :)
Mammamia, che partita. Quella scatola intorno al Re era micidiale. Complimenti Magnus, se imparerai a essere più gentile durante le interviste sarai davvero il pacchetto completo. Forza Ancona.
Strange to see this exact game on ten other youtube channels and now I am able to get it from the source, Magnus. It's like people are scurrying for content.
I'M NEW TO BTC AND I'VE BEEN MAKING LOSSES TRYING TO MAKE PROFIT MYSELF IN TRADING ...I THOUGHT TRADING DEMO ACCOUNT IS JUST LIKE TRADING THE REAL MARKET...CAN ANYONE HELP ME OUT OR AT LEAST ADVISE ME ON WHAT TO DO...?
Venturing into trading world without the help of a professional trader and expecting profit is like turning water into wine lol...you would need a miracle, that’s why started my trade with exp mr Jack Jefferson
I'm so happy for taking the bold step in working and investing $2000 with Exprt Mr Jack Jefferson after a week I received $19,680 worth btc directly to my wallet.!
What an incredible game. Magnus Carlsen is perhaps the greatest chess player of all time. Maybe only Garry Kasparov could be considered greater than Carlsen. But it's becoming more difficult as time goes by to decide who is the best ever. Congrats Magnus for playing an amazing game. That game will be legendary.
To watch this Game likes watching real live Game again. This Game Will be one big Game from Magnus. Congratulation to Magnus, hopefully still a strongly Players for this year again.
What an amazing play to sac the queen there, really well played in the context of this game, especially since carlsen is probably less familiar with the position. Absolute expert of complication. Really enjoyed this game, it demonstrates just how creative chess can still be, Fisher wasn't entirely right after all. Computers probably wouldnt enjoy this game, but humans? this is gold, and thats where the beauty of chess lies for me, beyond calculation and into psychology and pressure. Its rare to find such a beautiful opportunity.
I'm trying to get into chess as a little hobby to keep my mind sharp but I got to say I suck....and it's very disheartening how this stuff flies over my head. I'm not as smart as I thought I was that's dam sure
When you listen to the commentary when the Queen sacrifice was made it make you laugh at the end and you realise that is why Magnus is Magnus and the commentators are commentators😁. Awesome game👍
You can subscribe to Magnus Carlsen RUclips Channel to see more Magnus content :)
Ratio
You know you’ve already lost when Magnus sacrifices his queen.
19 hours later and Magnus has just lost a game against Radjabov sacrificing his queen
@@JulianRL_ hahahaha
Parker Productions I bet that dudes a blast at parties
@@googboog3317 He's the guy that when you tell a dry sarcastic joke he immediately gets into the most serious argument with you when your both on the same side. Real nasty like.
3 light pieces versus queen is such an interesting material distribution!
The fort Magnus made to protect his king was amazing
Incredible chess, but also so visually pleasing with the fort around the king:)
three musketeers castle
@@antitrustanonyme6322 it's hidden in the name: MAGeNiUS
Incredible
knights on outposts, man
This is definitely a "don't try this at home" moment. Not many people can coordinate their pieces as well as Carlsen can.
Not in a blitz at least. So many steps you need to think of before each move
This actually reminds me of a game played between Kramnik and Kasparov where Kasparov came at Kramnik with all guns blazing and Kramnik just forming a phenomenal coccoon only to spring out of it and delivering a knock out blow. This was an amazing game from Carlsen though.
In friendly games you should do this if you get the opportunity...it is a good learning experience. No harm no foul, in friendlies .
@@JokerScribe I've seen the game when Capablanca playing King's Gambit sacrificed his Queen for two bishops. Here is only trading - not sacrifice. My last game playing black color I also sold my Queen : 1.e4 e5 2.d4 ed 3.Q:d4 Nc6 4.Qa4 Bc5 5.Bb5 Nd4 6.c3 Qf6 7.cd B:d4 8.Nf3 B:b2 9.e5 B:e5 10.Bg5 B:a1 11.B:f6 N:f6 ..... And my opponent lost that game after a few mistakes.
Hahahaha definitely
Dear Magnus, you you are my idol, I followed your footsteps and sacrificed queen today too. But I didn’t get anything in return and lost immediately. No problem, I’ll try again tomorrow.
Well It is not a sacrifice, that was totally blundered
😭😭😭😭😭😭
Im laughing. This killed me.😁
Hahahahaa
Huge as well as little difference between sacrifice and blunder!!!
Very impressive Magnus, really nice. This reminds me of my hometown championship final game where I sacrificed my queen for 3 months of depression.
I had to laugh, haha
Craaaaaazy. I love this era of chess we're in nowadays. The Classical World Championship games might be nearly all draws, but every other tournament is incredibly dynamic, with lots of sacs and computer-inspired h-pawn pushes. Great time to be a chess fan.
yep the key to solvinf=g thde boring drawathon was simply to reduce the time
This feels supenatural. Even if 3 pieces for a queen is understandable, it just seems that magnus pieces are going to be really slow in the opening, he lets his knight gets dragged around the board to somehow find a safe haven on h4, he leaves the king in the middle, he sacrifices his d pawn to hinder whites attack...Magnus somehow broke almost every principle in this game and managed to come out on top. He also took by surprise one of the best preparator in the game on move 8. This is something else. I wonder if Magnus had this prepared or if he just felt invincible to try this.
It was an unsound sacrifice if white would have played Qd3 instead of Nd2 on move 10 after Nd2 it's all good for black.
@@mhqa_ computer engines are handy aren't they? 😂
Personally didn't see how Nd2 would be good in that situation. Forcing the knight to go to a7 or c7 by playing Qd3 or c4 would be miles better.
f4 was also unsound. The whole idea behind the Nd2 move was to go to e4 and then cement the knight on d6. That variation would block the development of the light squared bishop almost indefinitely. But he didnt do that and and it allowed magnus to block the idea by playing d5.
Anything after that is just a mess to analyze ngl HAHA
@@onelove154 well Internet is handy isn't it ?
@@mhqa_ It's easy to criticize GM moves when you're using a chess engine. Without it you wouldn't have a clue what is going on.
The speed which he played this masterpiece is amazing……. Talk about free-styling ……wow !!!
Amazing play by Magnus. Just didn't put a foot wrong after the queen sacrifice.
The engines would disagree but I get your point. Very impressive play.
@@fahimp3 It's a good thing he's playing a human.
@@fahimp3 Engine evaluations assume the opponent will evaluate a position the same as the engine does. Since no human evaluates positions the same way, engine evaluations aren't particularly informative, especially in rapid play. Magnus is quite often behind in engine evaluation terms because he is forcing his opponent to make difficult choices and take risks which Magnus can take advantage of. This would be a poor strategy against an engine but is effective against fallible humans.
@@jrd33 I was speaking objectively, obviously not the practicalities of human play. Engines are used by GMs because of their objectivity (although not perfect) .
@@fahimp3 from that position (after all pieces were coordinating) even with his not engine perfect play, I think he would beat any engine
Losing my queen in the first 10 moves is my pattern, but I always lose
Join the club!
😂 😂 😂
Magnus in 2021 showing us what relative pins can be sometimes, well...relative! Being so daring in challenging assumptions is one of the things I admire at Magnus. The fact that he does that and still win shows the mastery he achieved
Commentator: " If your pieces aren't coordinated, never sacrifice your queen "
Magnus : " Hold my bishop "
What a game from King Magnus 👑👑👑 !! A real medieval castle ...WOW !! So impressive !
Yeah, the position looked stunning especially when Magnus was protected by mostly pieces and the two white pawns! haha
9:16 Those knights defending the King are EPIC!
Magnus showed Anish that he does not need queen to play with him. Anish burned :D
Hats off!!! If there is ever a game that describes what a GOAT is this is it!!!
Indeed Magnus is (one of) the greatest chess players of all time but I think it's maybe more relevant to put Magnus along with da Vincvi, Michaelangelo, Picasso as he undoubtedly is one of the greatest artists as well. A Masterpiece today Magnus.
Only Garry is perhaps greater than Magnus and even that's becoming questionable. Magnus, is an incredible chess player.
Mike Tyson
@@onelove154 imho the best of all time. yes Kasparov was a beast in his days ...
6:47
"Magnus is in check, the King is highlited"
"Wow!"
ok bruuuv
“If your pieces are not coordinated, never sac your queen”
Carlsen: Hold my queen
This is the first time ive considered Magnus to be better than Fischer. Incredible game
Huh? It's difficult to compare players of different eras due to the way Elo works. We can only compare players to their player base. We can look at what games are the most aesthetically pleasing but to say who was better Magnus or Fischer etc isn't possible. We can have a personal preference but that's as much as we can know.
Many modern players absolutely mog Fischer. Modern players memorize everything that players of the past did as well as new things. The newer generation is always gonna be better than the previous, especially in chess.
@@sarban1653 I agree, it's progress. To put a number on exactly how much better is a different thing though.
@@sarban1653 it doesn't make them better at chess, since most of them are so talented "thanks" to the computer.
Of course they're naturally really good at chess, but in my opinion, to say someone is better at chess than another, would mean they had the same stuff to train it to start with. Having a 3'600 Elo computer to prepare your games and learn the best moves is kind of cheat considering older players didnt have that, and couldn't even believe computers would ever be smarter than humans
@@bxriflexvv The advantage of modern technology makes them better even if it's "unfair". Being better is only about skill, not how you achieve it. You could argue that people from the past like Fischer are the most "talented" of all time, but that's different.
Carlsen, you have defeated a draw master such as Giri. You are the goat.
Magnus is too clean, it's not even fair.
Giri is legend! I hate the draws but it's part of the game. If it means you score the points to stay in x tournament then playing for a draw is what is do too. Why risk a big L when you can guarantee the draw?
Next time I loose my Queen, I'll try defending and securing a win! This is a great inspiration!
Actually here Magnus didn't lost his queen, he exchanged it for 3 pieces. If you lose the queen without gaining anything in return, then its useless to try and defend the position (unless your opponent is really bad)
How much fancy transitions can you add to a chess game?
Developer: Yes
Just analysed this game.. Magnus made only 3-4 non engine best moves the whole game after the queen sac... Amazing game..
I also analysed it and saw he missed the top moves 12-13 times. The last being beautiful checkmates. However game length was 50+ AND It's blitz, and insane complications. Dont get me wrong the man is a legend just wanted to clear its 13 instead of 3.
@@svetlinradoev9336 you're kind of right. But I checked the cloud analysis of lichess (high depth) and was surprised to see that he only made two inaccuracies after the sac. And even those inaccuracies is after he got a winning position (bringing down he's advantage from like -4 to -3... basically insignificant overall). I actually thought he made a lot more mistakes seeing that it's a complicated blitz game
"There are two kind of chess players in the world... One Magnus, Two all the others..." :D
How to build safest castle for your king?
Learn from this game.😍
Anis be like: Why me?
I cannot wait to see Levy's video on this. Truly amazing.
It's more an exchange (Magnus even ends up better materially speaking, even though the position is trash afterward) than a sacrifice though
I get u. But considering the complete lack of developed pieces you would be left with. It should still be considered a sacrifice imo. Like 3 or 4 top moves by Giri may have changed the outcome drastically.
Minor pieces are worth 3 points while the queen is worth 9. At best, they ended with level material after the exchange. However, the computer analysis gave Giri a strong advantage after the queen sac. Based on those facts I'd say that the argument for a queen sac is stronger.
Old Magnus: I don't believe in fortresses.
New Magnus: I don't believe in pins.
After COVID he was little bit suffering, but now he is fully rehabilitated and going as king again ♥️ peace of art!!! Well done champion!
This is insane, visual gold. Congrats
Damn, even that i didnt watch that thing live, i was excited about whats going to happen next and it was a beauty of a game. Cannot wait for Agadmator to analyse the hell out of that masterpiece!!
This is legendary
This is literally stunning endgame play
I always tell ppl who criticise modern chess players and hail e.g 'the creativity of Tal' that it wouldn't work that way. These days, a Tal move would just be seen as a blunder. If he wins, his opponents clearly blunders back. Players are (and ppl expect them to be) better at taking advantage of dubious moves given enough time. Even here in blitz, you can see some aren't so impressed that Giri couldn't win, especially when they could see all the engine lines
What a legendary way to brake every single opening principle and win! :D
the coordination of magnus' pieces are just incredible! every move is on spot
I am blown up by the fact that title has "I" instead of "Magnus Carlsen"
true I guess this was personally titled by him🙂
Queen C7 at 7:30 would have changed the game completely. Black would have lost either Bishop or Rook (bishop if any other move than Knight A7, and if black plays Knight A7 then white Rook to D8 and check to get black Rook.
This game belongs to the Hall of the Immortals.
This has to be the best blitz game in the history of chess (real tournament games, not just random online). Any games that can compete?!
Is this brilliance of the year? What a fantastic queen sacrifice by Magnus. 👍👍👍👍
TRADE, not sacrifice
The two of you are sitting behind what is basically one table and you are playing on a computer? Damn!
I found it very odd that even though they are in the same room, they are still playing on computers instead of facing each other at a real board.
Amazing game though! Bra gjort, Magnus!
Yeah, it looks weird. But I think it's so that the commentators and viewers can see what's going on more easily.
@@Eliseo_M_P it because covid as everyone acting crazy.. surprised they didnt have to wear gloves to touch the mouse
Magnus is such a brillaint player there's really no words for him
Moral of this video
Always sacrifice your queen and and built a house for yourself to win in life
I once stood in front of a van Gogh and stared. For me, watching this game feels similar to that.
The God in Blitz
Damn man that pawn sacrifice to activate and coordinate all his pieces that's just next level
Will this go down as Magnus’s Immortal ??
I think it should that too when playing so fast
There are no words that can describe how amazing this game is.
Carlsen plays an absurd chess. not human.
come to Brazil
Magnus was playing sliding tiles puzzle towards the end, insane
This is one of those sacrifices that needs concrete objectives. As a player, everything that is in the board should have a definitive purpose, no matter how precious the pieces are. When a player release that tension of losing something valuable in exchange for beautiful ending, that is how everything becomes real. I believe that knowing the principles is not enough, you'll have to have a mind of less worry and more thoughts. Good work Magnus :)
Mammamia, che partita. Quella scatola intorno al Re era micidiale. Complimenti Magnus, se imparerai a essere più gentile durante le interviste sarai davvero il pacchetto completo. Forza Ancona.
What a masterpiece
It looks like an instant classic. I hope it is remembered and revisited for many years to come.
After watching this game, i feel reloaded thor + hulk mood activated
That game was so majestic. It started off with a queen sacrifice and then ends with a pawn promotion to a queen, what a beautiful cyclical journey
Queen TRADE, not sacrifice
@@amjan "I SACRIFICED my queen in my game against Anish Giri"
what a pawn push! the beauty of the bishop checks to guarantee Queening... Superb!
The unstoppable pawn and the invincible king... Magnus is surely having the time of his life 🔥
OMG! Magnus is the best chess player of all time!
Wow, this game is one of the best I've ever seen. Thanks Magnus!
Strange to see this exact game on ten other youtube channels and now I am able to get it from the source, Magnus. It's like people are scurrying for content.
Your the best Carlsen!
Like a very good movie, this game can be watched several time and we will still see new things at each watching session !
The whole time,
Magnus’s King: 😴
Anish’s King: 🥵
Anish was so close to win that. He did not capitalise on his queen and rook on the files.
So when Magnus loses his queen, it’s a “sacrifice” but when I lose my queen, it’s a “blunder”
Insane.... Incredible.... 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
average men enjoyer over here
Brilliant Queen Sacrificed captures 3 piece [2 Knights And 1 Bishop]
Anish wasn't ready for that Sac. He would attack magnus in the H file
I'M NEW TO BTC AND I'VE BEEN MAKING LOSSES TRYING TO MAKE PROFIT MYSELF IN TRADING ...I THOUGHT TRADING DEMO ACCOUNT IS JUST LIKE TRADING THE REAL MARKET...CAN ANYONE HELP ME OUT OR AT LEAST ADVISE ME ON WHAT TO DO...?
Venturing into trading world without the help of a professional trader and expecting profit is like turning water into wine lol...you would need a miracle, that’s why started my trade with exp mr Jack Jefferson
@@paulsirota2583 That’s true most people today have been having a lot of failures in fx and crypto sector because of bad orientation and bad exp😔
Wow I'm shock you all mentioned and recommended Expt Mr Jack Jefferson I thought I'm the only working with him
You don't need to be shock because I'm also a huge beneficiary of expert Mr Jack Jefferson
I'm so happy for taking the bold step in working and investing $2000 with Exprt Mr Jack Jefferson after a week I received $19,680 worth btc directly to my wallet.!
what an absolutely thrilling and instructive game. What an honor for chess enthusiasts to be able to watch these two absolute beasts go at it
The best game i have watched live
Unbelievable game. It's Magnus and then there's everyone else.
"If you give him an artistic choice he will definitely go for it"
This announcer explained what enpassant was.
Remember that Anish Giri is among the elite, and yet is beaten with a queen up almost the entire game ....
People think he sacrificed his queen but he had already calculated 50 moves down that he's gonna get it back
This is incredible stuff from Magnus. A masterpiece.
Magnus: sacrificed queen
Computer: 2.5 points advantage for Giri
Magnus: am i joke to you?
Games like these are just mindblowing 🔥
Dude move 8 was inspired against a mighty opponant!
After Magnus sacrificed his queen he literally moved his pieces with the precision of a machine
What an incredible game. Magnus Carlsen is perhaps the greatest chess player of all time. Maybe only Garry Kasparov could be considered greater than Carlsen. But it's becoming more difficult as time goes by to decide who is the best ever. Congrats Magnus for playing an amazing game. That game will be legendary.
Give him time if he prevails for few more years he will be the goat by far
Magnus is amazing, Garry was too let's see how Carlsen handles Alireza when he gets stronger.
10:42 the donut of doom has been formed
magnus thinking,"just as i thought"
MC gets the idea at 0:35 I think: "Hmmm now I can do _that_ ! Yummy! I just have to check the moves on beforehand to make sure".
Magnus Carlsen can promote his pawn to another king.
Magnus Carlsen sacrificed his king and won.
Magnus Carlsen played chess against himself and won.
My mom and brother met this incredible creature in Oslo! It is incredible to see him this good and presise!
To watch this Game likes watching real live Game again. This Game Will be one big Game from Magnus. Congratulation to Magnus, hopefully still a strongly Players for this year again.
What an amazing play to sac the queen there, really well played in the context of this game, especially since carlsen is probably less familiar with the position. Absolute expert of complication.
Really enjoyed this game, it demonstrates just how creative chess can still be, Fisher wasn't entirely right after all.
Computers probably wouldnt enjoy this game, but humans? this is gold, and thats where the beauty of chess lies for me, beyond calculation and into psychology and pressure.
Its rare to find such a beautiful opportunity.
Fischer would be proud of Magnus.
Only Magnus can sacrifice his queen against a super gm Anish.
"Success is not final. Failure is not fatal. It's the courage to continue that matters" - Magnus...Sorry, Winston Churchill.
I'm trying to get into chess as a little hobby to keep my mind sharp but I got to say I suck....and it's very disheartening how this stuff flies over my head. I'm not as smart as I thought I was that's dam sure
When you listen to the commentary when the Queen sacrifice was made it make you laugh at the end and you realise that is why Magnus is Magnus and the commentators are commentators😁. Awesome game👍