Welch hervorragende Künstler ! Man kann sich fragen, ob zur Zeit von Mozart, die Musiker eigentlich so perfekt spielen konnten ... Vielen Dank für diese wunderbaren Momente !!👍👍👍
Einfach herrlich, perfekt!!! Die berühmte sangliche Stelle nach den drei Akkordschlägen des Orchesters etwa in der Mitte des dritten Satzes interpretiert der wunderbare Pianist mit solcher Wärme und Tiefe und Liebe. Er traut sich weich, im Goldenen Ton, und sogar mit Rubato zu spielen. Andere Pianisten machen da gar nichts. Piementesi spielt zum Dahinschmelzen!!!
Another delightful example of how joy and precision come together when you listen to hr sinfonic here and in union with the always clear an perfect sound this recording is great to hear. Congratulations to orchestra AND sound engineers
J'aime beaucoup la volubilité scandée et affirmée de Francesco Piemontese .On est tout à fait dans l'esprit mozartien autant dans la précision que dans la fantaisie qui se ressaisi sans cesse de toute échappée au delà d'un cadre strict , faussement échevelé et pourtant on sent chez lui comme un appel constant de s'échapper des limites imposées . Nous sommes avec Wolfgang Amadeus , en définitive dans un jeu subtil pour échapper aux règles , tout en faisant semblant de les affirmer et de les respecter . Ce sautillement si constant chez lui va pour une tentative d'envol de la mélodie encouragée par les vents , flute , cor , ou hautbois , comme pour nous dire sans cesse : "Je m'échappe de la partition et de ce monde vil et vulgaire ". Car lui même et son père Léopold avaient conscience dans leurs échanges épistolaires de la grande vulgarité de ce monde constamment en proie à la pesanteur ainsi que d'un style artistique pas forcément délicat et élevé .
What a remarkably beautiful orchestral sound. The soloist is excellent but the orchestra steals the show as far as I am concerned. Thank you. More videos, please!
No such thing as "the greatest" when it comes to art. No quantitative measure exists like in won-loss sports league standings. Can you really say it's greater than Mozart's C Minor or Beethoven's or the Rach 3? Certainly a great concerto though.
@@telephilia Yes, of course this is a far superior concerto than any of those you've mentioned. Do you think those are better concertos than K. 503? Can I ask why?
Et cet orchestre s'il vous plais ! Ils font des merveilles dans tous les domaines, Mahler, Wagner, Mozart avec eux est un must, une clarté autant dans les piano que dans les forte pratiquement autant explosifs que les instruments d'époques ; alors qu'ils font tout sur des modernes, leurs passions se ressentent dans leurs corps. Quel orchestre de génie !
KV 503 (Kennedy Center - Program notes by Richard Freed - Wikipedia) The early part of December 1786 was an especially busy time for Mozart, who was by then planning his visit to Prague the following month for performances of The Marriage of Figaro. He apparently performed this concerto in Vienna on December 5, 1786, the day after he completed the score, and on the day following that premiere he wrote the final double bar in the score of his Symphony No. 38 in D major (K. 504, the first symphony he had composed in more than three years), which he probably introduced a week or two later. He took the symphony to Prague, where he arrived as a hero and enjoyed the greatest success of his life. By the time he arrived there, on January 11, 1787, Figaro was already in production and its tunes had been taken up by the public and turned into dances. Mozart not only attended performances of his wildly popular opera, but conducted one of them himself, and on January 19 he gave a concert in which he conducted his new symphony, which became known as the "Prague" Symphony. While that symphony and has figured in the concert repertory ever since then, the concerto composed at the same time fell into an incredibly prolonged neglect following Mozart's death. There is no record of his performing any of his concertos during that famous visit to Prague; he played K. 503 again in Vienna on April 7, 1787, and again in Leipzig on May 12, but when Artur Schnabel performed the work with the Vienna Philharmonic under George Szell in 1934, the event was noted as the first performance of this work in that city since Mozart's own, some 147 years earlier. It was not until after the Second World War that this concerto took its place in the repertory, and was recognized as one of the very greatest works of its kind. The last three concertos Mozart composed before this one-No. 22 in E-flat (K. 482), No. 23 in A major (K. 488), No. 24 in C minor (K. 491)-are associated with Figaro. All three of them were written more or less concurrently with the opera, and there are reminders of this in Mozart's use of the orchestra, particularly the expressive writing for the winds. Don Giovanni, commissioned during that triumphal visit to Prague, was produced there in October 1787, and Così fan tute did not materialize until 1790, but it is with Così that this Concerto in C major shares its most striking features. The parallel here, as the distinguished Mozart and Haydn authority H.C. Robbins Landon has suggested, is one between "the stage work in which Mozart most brilliantly and perfectly solved the structural, dramatic and musical problems which had occupied so much of his best operatic efforts" and the concerto that "contains the essence of Mozart's approach to the sonata form: unity within diversity." In his discussion of the piano concertos, Mr. Landon did not hesitate to designate this one "the grandest, most difficult and most symphonic of them all," while noting also "the complete negation of any deliberate virtuoso elements." The opening of this concerto has been compared frequently with that of Mozart's final symphony, the "Jupiter" (No. 41, also in C major, K. 551): it is not merely festive, as so many big C-major concert works of its period are, but more specifically majestic (and, needless to add, Mozart knew how to achieve this quality on a very persuasive level, without any huffing-and-puffing or any sort of self-conscious gesture). This distinction was emphasized by Cuthbert Girdlestone in his book on the Mozart concertos; he cited the marking for the opening movement-Allegro maestoso, rather than brillante-and observed, "Few of Mozart's compositions show themselves to the world with so original a frontispiece and none opens in such bold tones. Its heroic nature is apparent in its first bars-not the sham heroism of an overture for which a few impersonal formulas suffice, but that which expresses greatness of spirit." Beyond that, however, and despite the work's symphonic character, for Girdlestone the parallel was not with the "Jupiter" Symphony, and not with any of the stage works, but with yet another towering work in C major from roughly the same period, the String Quintet, K. 515. In the concerto's opening tutti, elaborate as well as majestic, is a four-note motif whose rhythmic pattern is more or less the same as that of the famous opening theme of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony (21 years in the future when this concerto was composed). The other themes in this movement are related to this motif, and one of these, formed by joining a "second half" to it, comes close to being a far more striking anticipation of the Marseillaise (composed five months after Mozart's death). But once the piano enters, the entire question of resemblances or "pre-echoes" simply evaporates under the sheer breadth and variety in Mozart's exploration of his fairly modest basic materials. (This concerto is one of several by Mozart for which his own cadenzas have not survived). The middle movement, although marked Andante, has the character of a long-breathed adagio. Its relative simplicity and serenity make it both an effective foil for the preceding movement and an effective transition to what Girdlestone described as "one of Mozart's most serious-minded rondos." The very substantial finale exhibits a remarkable balance between animation and subtlety, and also a borrowing from one of Mozart's own earlier works: the theme is clearly recognizable as an adaptation of the gavotte that stands at the penultimate position in the sequence of ballet music for Idomeneo. (That opera seria, introduced in Munich in 1781, was in fact given its first Viennese performance at the beginning of the year in which this concerto was composed, but the premiere of Figaro and the composition of three other piano concertos came between these two events.) The gavotte tune no longer has its soft contours here, and there are also witty passages that do indeed seem to look ahead to Così fan tute, passing episodes of affecting tenderness, and overall an impression as aristocratic and majestic, in its way, as that created by the opening movement. The difference between the two outer movements, to quote Girdlestone once more, "is the absence of heroic accents" in the finale, but the same writer observed that an episode in the middle of the rondo "attains a degree of passion which has no counterpart in the [opening movement]."
I'm no Mozart authority, but Piemontesi's performance here seems to capture the essence of this music, and his (as I heard it) note-perfect pianism with warmth and charm was a joy to hear. His Mozart has been described as "cool" and "literal"; I can subscribe to the latter assessment perhaps, but I believe these two attributes are, in Piemontesi's case, mutually exclusive. I look forward to hearing more from him. (His orchestral support was, by the way, also great!)
(Piano Concerto 25) 1st movement 0:23 begins | 2:47 build up | 6:43 build up | 12:14 build up | 14:32 build up to end 2nd movement 15:17 begins 3rd movement 22:49 begins | *24:28 playful | 28:25 ending preview | 28:58 playful | 30:22 ending preview | 31:15 build up to end
Loving this splendid work-they all are-by Mozart on the sad date December 5, and pondering along with us all on what other amazing works might have been.
Apesar dos solavancos provocados pelo contato dos sapatos de Piemontesi aos pedais do piano, perceptível aos ouvidos mais críticos, o concerto foi brilhante. Tal como já frisei, amo está orquestra, seus músicos, essa incrível sala de concerto e seu vibrante maestro. Quero novas postagens! Obrigado.
Equivoquei-me quando os solavancos! Eles existem sim, mas são provocados pelos sapatos de M. Honeck sobre o tablado. Como já ressaltei, só quem tem ouvido preciso observa isso. Mas isso não diminui a graça do concerto.Nem tudo é perfeito ... .
Des musiciens extraordinaires ! Mozart aurait sans doute apprécié cette interprétation . On peut se demander si du temps de cet immense compositeur , les orchestres jouaient aussi bien que ceux d'aujourd'hui . Un grand merci à tous ces artistes !
Mozart didn't usually write cadenzas, nor did he in this. Usually it's up to the soloist to do a little jazz-like improv. There are some written out ones by the likes of Hummel (a near-contemporary of Mozart) that are often performed.
Der klare und gut kontrollierte Anschlag des Soloklaviers ist echt eindrucksvoll. Die zurückgehaltene Begleitung des Orchesters ist auch bemerkenswert.
Wunderbar. Aber dieses grässliche dissonante "Schritsch" am Anfang und Ende macht es kaputt. Schade. Das war kein großer Wurf, @hr. Es verdirbt mir die Einstimmung und den Nachklang. Bitte herausschneiden.
oh wie erstaunlich, wieviel bach in diesem stück ist. und man erkennt sehr deutlich den fundamentalen unterschied zwischen mozart und beethoven. mozart ist reinste musik, harmonien, können, aber man kann nichts anderes erwarten als das, musik in vollendung und könnte glauben, dass dies schon alles ist und war es damals wohl auch. anders bei beethoven. hinter allem, als motiv, finale, hintergründiges steht immer noch der anspruch! der anspruch etwas mehr zu meinen, als das gespielte. gerade in den konzerten nr. 4 und 5 findet man viel von der musikalität mozarts. dennoch fehlt diesen der gewaltige charakter der omnipotenten umarmung alles um bedeutung zitternden, dem beethoven ausdruck verliehen hat. bedeutend auch finde ich die völlige abwesenheit mozarts in schindlers biografie. danke fürs hochladen.
Von meinem Gefühl her würde ich sagen die Streicherbesetzung ist zu groß für Mozart. Und ich sehe einige noch ziemlich exzessiv Vibrato benutzen. Gehört sich auch nicht für diese Musik.
I am not fond of the conductor's style: Mozart played as Schumann (the end was even Wagnerian). The first note in the triplet with assertion, please! More delicatezza, less salsa. I commend Benjamin Northey (Sydney International Piano Competition 2016)
Welch hervorragende Künstler ! Man kann sich fragen, ob zur Zeit von Mozart, die Musiker eigentlich so perfekt spielen konnten ... Vielen Dank für diese wunderbaren Momente !!👍👍👍
Ja,danke wunderbar für diese wunderbare Spiel, des Orchesters Miteinander und dem Pianisten dem Team und dem Dirigenten und dem Schöpfer. Dankeschön
Großartig. Nur wenige Pianisten spielen vor allem den 3. Satz so eindrucksvoll.
How wonderful !! I really rediscovered Mozart! Thank you very much to the pianist Francesco piemontesi , the orchestra members and the conductor !!!
Esecuzione perfetta Francesco Piemontesi straordinario.
A beautifully integrated sound of orchestra and soloist. The soloist has a flowing and melodious technique. Wunderbar...Vielen Dank an ihnen!
So beautiful a music like this one is indeed a joy forever. To its brilliance Piemontesi, Honecker and this splendid orchestra add a great deal.
Einfach herrlich, perfekt!!!
Die berühmte sangliche Stelle nach den drei Akkordschlägen des Orchesters etwa in der Mitte des dritten Satzes interpretiert der wunderbare Pianist mit solcher Wärme und Tiefe und Liebe. Er traut sich weich, im Goldenen Ton, und sogar mit Rubato zu spielen. Andere Pianisten machen da gar nichts. Piementesi spielt zum Dahinschmelzen!!!
It is always a pleasure to see and listen to this very talented pianist, Francesco Piemontesi is fantastic. Many thanks for sharing.
Another delightful example of how joy and precision come together when you listen to hr sinfonic here and in union with the always clear an perfect sound this recording is great to hear. Congratulations to orchestra AND sound engineers
Thank you. First time I’ve heard and seen Mr Piemontesi. A simply delightful pianist and orchestra. Most enjoyable.
Oudtshoornify l love him@@
J'aime beaucoup la volubilité scandée et affirmée de Francesco Piemontese .On est tout à fait dans l'esprit mozartien autant dans la précision que dans la fantaisie qui se ressaisi sans cesse de toute échappée au delà d'un cadre strict , faussement échevelé et pourtant on sent chez lui comme un appel constant de s'échapper des limites imposées . Nous sommes avec Wolfgang Amadeus , en définitive dans un jeu subtil pour échapper aux règles , tout en faisant semblant de les affirmer et de les respecter . Ce sautillement si constant chez lui va pour une tentative d'envol de la mélodie encouragée par les vents , flute , cor , ou hautbois , comme pour nous dire sans cesse : "Je m'échappe de la partition et de ce monde vil et vulgaire ". Car lui même et son père Léopold avaient conscience dans leurs échanges épistolaires de la grande vulgarité de ce monde constamment en proie à la pesanteur ainsi que d'un style artistique pas forcément délicat et élevé .
You cannot really say: 'en proie de la pesanteur'. Life is both yin and yang. Mozart is aware of that!
A wonderful performance by all.... Beautiful to listen too...
Full of life and joy and life-enhancing. Perfect playing, a privilege to listen to. Loved the the tracking drums
I love Morzart!!! Thank you very much for this enjoyable concert. from Chicago 2020/9/17
What a remarkably beautiful orchestral sound. The soloist is excellent but the orchestra steals the show as far as I am concerned. Thank you. More videos, please!
Aleksandar Jankovski Note all the period instruments. This is how Mozart himself heard it.
Valveless natural horns aside, all the other instruments, including the piano, are modern.
This comfortable and graceful and wonderful and inspirational performance is off the charts
A superb performance!
I. Allegro maestoso (C major): 0:24
II. Andante (C major): 15:17
III. Allegretto(C major): 22:49
Greatest piano concerto ever written. Change my mind.
No such thing as "the greatest" when it comes to art. No quantitative measure exists like in won-loss sports league standings. Can you really say it's greater than Mozart's C Minor or Beethoven's or the Rach 3? Certainly a great concerto though.
@@telephilia Yes, of course this is a far superior concerto than any of those you've mentioned. Do you think those are better concertos than K. 503? Can I ask why?
@@telephilia There is such thing, only that it differs eyes to eyes
미안하지만 이 곡은 모차르트의 대표적 실패작. 굴렌 굴드가 말한대로 발전부를 못쓰는 작곡가라는 비판대로 딱 앞에 3분만 좋고 그 이후는 거의 똑같은 전개의 반복, 무의미한 시간 연장, 다른 협주곡에서 보이는 참신한 멜로디의 전개가 전혀 없다.
Les bras m'en tombent . Un des plus beaux concerts du siècle ! Le pianiste a tout compris à Mozart. Difficile de retomber sur terre après ça ...
Et cet orchestre s'il vous plais ! Ils font des merveilles dans tous les domaines, Mahler, Wagner, Mozart avec eux est un must, une clarté autant dans les piano que dans les forte pratiquement autant explosifs que les instruments d'époques ; alors qu'ils font tout sur des modernes, leurs passions se ressentent dans leurs corps. Quel orchestre de génie !
farbiges spiel bravissimo.¨!!!!!!!!
KV 503 (Kennedy Center - Program notes by Richard Freed - Wikipedia)
The early part of December 1786 was an especially busy time for Mozart, who was by then planning his visit to Prague the following month for performances of The Marriage of Figaro. He apparently performed this concerto in Vienna on December 5, 1786, the day after he completed the score, and on the day following that premiere he wrote the final double bar in the score of his Symphony No. 38 in D major (K. 504, the first symphony he had composed in more than three years), which he probably introduced a week or two later. He took the symphony to Prague, where he arrived as a hero and enjoyed the greatest success of his life. By the time he arrived there, on January 11, 1787, Figaro was already in production and its tunes had been taken up by the public and turned into dances. Mozart not only attended performances of his wildly popular opera, but conducted one of them himself, and on January 19 he gave a concert in which he conducted his new symphony, which became known as the "Prague" Symphony. While that symphony and has figured in the concert repertory ever since then, the concerto composed at the same time fell into an incredibly prolonged neglect following Mozart's death. There is no record of his performing any of his concertos during that famous visit to Prague; he played K. 503 again in Vienna on April 7, 1787, and again in Leipzig on May 12, but when Artur Schnabel performed the work with the Vienna Philharmonic under George Szell in 1934, the event was noted as the first performance of this work in that city since Mozart's own, some 147 years earlier. It was not until after the Second World War that this concerto took its place in the repertory, and was recognized as one of the very greatest works of its kind.
The last three concertos Mozart composed before this one-No. 22 in E-flat (K. 482), No. 23 in A major (K. 488), No. 24 in C minor (K. 491)-are associated with Figaro. All three of them were written more or less concurrently with the opera, and there are reminders of this in Mozart's use of the orchestra, particularly the expressive writing for the winds. Don Giovanni, commissioned during that triumphal visit to Prague, was produced there in October 1787, and Così fan tute did not materialize until 1790, but it is with Così that this Concerto in C major shares its most striking features. The parallel here, as the distinguished Mozart and Haydn authority H.C. Robbins Landon has suggested, is one between "the stage work in which Mozart most brilliantly and perfectly solved the structural, dramatic and musical problems which had occupied so much of his best operatic efforts" and the concerto that "contains the essence of Mozart's approach to the sonata form: unity within diversity." In his discussion of the piano concertos, Mr. Landon did not hesitate to designate this one "the grandest, most difficult and most symphonic of them all," while noting also "the complete negation of any deliberate virtuoso elements."
The opening of this concerto has been compared frequently with that of Mozart's final symphony, the "Jupiter" (No. 41, also in C major, K. 551): it is not merely festive, as so many big C-major concert works of its period are, but more specifically majestic (and, needless to add, Mozart knew how to achieve this quality on a very persuasive level, without any huffing-and-puffing or any sort of self-conscious gesture). This distinction was emphasized by Cuthbert Girdlestone in his book on the Mozart concertos; he cited the marking for the opening movement-Allegro maestoso, rather than brillante-and observed, "Few of Mozart's compositions show themselves to the world with so original a frontispiece and none opens in such bold tones. Its heroic nature is apparent in its first bars-not the sham heroism of an overture for which a few impersonal formulas suffice, but that which expresses greatness of spirit."
Beyond that, however, and despite the work's symphonic character, for Girdlestone the parallel was not with the "Jupiter" Symphony, and not with any of the stage works, but with yet another towering work in C major from roughly the same period, the String Quintet, K. 515. In the concerto's opening tutti, elaborate as well as majestic, is a four-note motif whose rhythmic pattern is more or less the same as that of the famous opening theme of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony (21 years in the future when this concerto was composed). The other themes in this movement are related to this motif, and one of these, formed by joining a "second half" to it, comes close to being a far more striking anticipation of the Marseillaise (composed five months after Mozart's death). But once the piano enters, the entire question of resemblances or "pre-echoes" simply evaporates under the sheer breadth and variety in Mozart's exploration of his fairly modest basic materials.
(This concerto is one of several by Mozart for which his own cadenzas have not survived).
The middle movement, although marked Andante, has the character of a long-breathed adagio. Its relative simplicity and serenity make it both an effective foil for the preceding movement and an effective transition to what Girdlestone described as "one of Mozart's most serious-minded rondos."
The very substantial finale exhibits a remarkable balance between animation and subtlety, and also a borrowing from one of Mozart's own earlier works: the theme is clearly recognizable as an adaptation of the gavotte that stands at the penultimate position in the sequence of ballet music for Idomeneo. (That opera seria, introduced in Munich in 1781, was in fact given its first Viennese performance at the beginning of the year in which this concerto was composed, but the premiere of Figaro and the composition of three other piano concertos came between these two events.) The gavotte tune no longer has its soft contours here, and there are also witty passages that do indeed seem to look ahead to Così fan tute, passing episodes of affecting tenderness, and overall an impression as aristocratic and majestic, in its way, as that created by the opening movement. The difference between the two outer movements, to quote Girdlestone once more, "is the absence of heroic accents" in the finale, but the same writer observed that an episode in the middle of the rondo "attains a degree of passion which has no counterpart in the [opening movement]."
Thanks for the enlightment with your fine introduction of the work!
이 곡은 모차르트의 대표적 실패작. 굴렌 굴드가 말한대로 발전부를 못쓰는 작곡가라는 비판대로 딱 앞에 3분만 좋고 그 이후는 거의 똑같은 전개의 반복 별다른 효용없이 시간만 늘인 느낌, 다른 협주곡에서 보이는 참신한 멜로디의 전개가 전혀 없다.
I'm no Mozart authority, but Piemontesi's performance here seems to capture the essence of this music, and his (as I heard it) note-perfect pianism with warmth and charm was a joy to hear. His Mozart has been described as "cool" and "literal"; I can subscribe to the latter assessment perhaps, but I believe these two attributes are, in Piemontesi's case, mutually exclusive. I look forward to hearing more from him. (His orchestral support was, by the way, also great!)
Genial. Excelente ejecución de este magnífico y bellísimo concierto.
(Piano Concerto 25)
1st movement
0:23 begins | 2:47 build up | 6:43 build up | 12:14 build up | 14:32 build up to end
2nd movement
15:17 begins
3rd movement
22:49 begins | *24:28 playful | 28:25 ending preview | 28:58 playful | 30:22 ending preview | 31:15 build up to end
Thank you for these wonderful uploads! And the best for 2021! Way to go!!
Hermosa Clara Andrada...saludos desde Barranquilla Colombia
Loving this splendid work-they all are-by Mozart on the sad date December 5, and pondering along with us all on what other amazing works might have been.
Чудесный концерт, и большое спасибо оркестру!
A truly magnificent performance of a seminal work of a great genius. Bravi tutti!
Parabéns pela impecável apresentação!
marvellous piece of music
Apesar dos solavancos provocados pelo contato dos sapatos de Piemontesi aos pedais do piano, perceptível aos ouvidos mais críticos, o concerto foi brilhante. Tal como já frisei, amo está orquestra, seus músicos, essa incrível sala de concerto e seu vibrante maestro. Quero novas postagens! Obrigado.
Equivoquei-me quando os solavancos! Eles existem sim, mas são provocados pelos sapatos de M. Honeck sobre o tablado. Como já ressaltei, só quem tem ouvido preciso observa isso. Mas isso não diminui a graça do concerto.Nem tudo é perfeito ... .
Majestuoso !!!
Thank you. Tolle Musik.
Des musiciens extraordinaires ! Mozart aurait sans doute apprécié cette interprétation . On peut se demander si du temps de cet immense compositeur , les orchestres jouaient aussi bien que ceux d'aujourd'hui .
Un grand merci à tous ces artistes !
Obrigado amigos e amigas musicistas! Saudações a todos!
SUPERB!
Most impressive!
קונצרט נפלא!!!
Buenisima interpretacion sin rutinas
Amazing ❤
Wonderful. Didn’t recognise the cadenza: is it the soloist’s own?
Mozart didn't usually write cadenzas, nor did he in this. Usually it's up to the soloist to do a little jazz-like improv. There are some written out ones by the likes of Hummel (a near-contemporary of Mozart) that are often performed.
Turkiyeden merhaba, teşekkürler
I like how the orchestra plays the three initial chords - not sustaining the last one.
Siempre te quiero Clara.
Der klare und gut kontrollierte Anschlag des Soloklaviers ist echt eindrucksvoll. Die zurückgehaltene Begleitung des Orchesters ist auch bemerkenswert.
Llega al alma,sentir este precioso trabajo de Mozart.
@@hectormoreno1449 Gracias.
Ah, Der Mister Dummschwätzer wieder
@@Schnittger891 Ach. Der Mister Dummenverachter wieder.
@@Schnittger891 Immerhin hier mal kurz und subjektiv, nicht in Pseudo-Kritiker-Manier!
#25 an old favorite
toll auch das die hessen immerwieder wenns passt das alte blech rausholen, wie auch beim beethoven konzert mit patkop :-)
Wanderful
Why didn't they mention it's number 25 in Mozart's piano concertos?
Bravo!!!! Vorrei sapere le cadenze di chi sono!
참 아름다운 음악들 넘 멋지다용
Schön und erfrischend, und dennoch auch ,wenn man Kaija Saarriahos 6 Japanesen Gardens vorher angehört hat, auch modern.. Etwas für immer.
Who wrote this cadenza?
Wunderbar. Aber dieses grässliche dissonante "Schritsch" am Anfang und Ende macht es kaputt. Schade. Das war kein großer Wurf, @hr. Es verdirbt mir die Einstimmung und den Nachklang. Bitte herausschneiden.
Fazıl Say nerede
Grosartig
13:48 sounds like marseillaise
モーツァルトといえばあの世でマリーアントワネットと仲良くしているのだろうか❓
毎日モーツァルトの名演奏を 聴いているのだろうか❓
⚘⚘⚘⚘⚘
oh wie erstaunlich, wieviel bach in diesem stück ist. und man erkennt sehr deutlich den fundamentalen unterschied zwischen mozart und beethoven. mozart ist reinste musik, harmonien, können, aber man kann nichts anderes erwarten als das, musik in vollendung und könnte glauben, dass dies schon alles ist und war es damals wohl auch. anders bei beethoven. hinter allem, als motiv, finale, hintergründiges steht immer noch der anspruch! der anspruch etwas mehr zu meinen, als das gespielte. gerade in den konzerten nr. 4 und 5 findet man viel von der musikalität mozarts. dennoch fehlt diesen der gewaltige charakter der omnipotenten umarmung alles um bedeutung zitternden, dem beethoven ausdruck verliehen hat. bedeutend auch finde ich die völlige abwesenheit mozarts in schindlers biografie. danke fürs hochladen.
1:10
Von meinem Gefühl her würde ich sagen die Streicherbesetzung ist zu groß für Mozart. Und ich sehe einige noch ziemlich exzessiv Vibrato benutzen. Gehört sich auch nicht für diese Musik.
I am not fond of the conductor's style: Mozart played as Schumann (the end was even Wagnerian). The first note in the triplet with assertion, please! More delicatezza, less salsa. I commend Benjamin Northey (Sydney International Piano Competition 2016)
이 곡은 모차르트의 대표적 실패작. 굴렌 굴드가 말한대로 발전부를 못쓰는 작곡가라는 비판대로 딱 앞에 3분만 좋고 그 이후는 거의 똑같은 전개의 반복, 다른 협주곡에서 보이는 참신한 멜로디의 전개가 전혀 없다.
Kleiberabklatsch
Blödsinniger Kommentar