The Post Office Scandal: Investigation Gone Mad: Ian Ross

Ian Ross is a Listed Expert in financial crime investigations appointed to the International Court of Justice, The Hague. An Associate expert with the European Compliance Center in internal investigations, and Course Leader and Assessor in their Whistleblower Case Management diploma and other programmes.....An avid researcher and practitioner of investigative psychology. Published author of 3 books in fraud investigation and interviewing skills. A global trainer having delivered counter fraud training to law enforcement, regulators and corporate clients across 4 continents.

[@Pagespinner]

I could hardly believe that this only had 42 likes and 5 comments when I found it. Even now, after the ITV dramatization and its fallout, this deals with issues of the scandal still not touched on, ones that need broadcasting far and wide. A tremendous interview.

[@saigonpete]

This is brilliant input by Ian. I would volunteer that the behaviour by the lawyer acting for Post Office throwing a bundle of documents at Nichola Arch in his apparent frustration / attempts to intimidate strikes me as EXACTLY the same attitude of the cocky auditor who smirked and told me to get a lawyer - exactly the attitude was that she assumed I was a thief - whether or not she did remains to be heard, but she clearly thought that she had licence to treat me like this without any recourse. Post Office auditors are for the most part a bunch of unqualified clowns putting on a very poor act. They should ALL be investigated for corruption - there is no physical way possible that they cannot have been complicit in all of the crimes, if not by taking part, then at least by staying silent. The volume of automated prosecution was FAR TOO big to avoid.

[@hearthetruththeonrecordpod4430]

So pleased you liked it. We will have more interviews which we will publish over the next few weeks. Do look out for them. Jill

[@kpc5]

Stephen Bradshaw should spend the rest of his life in prison??

[@europhile2658]

very good and real "fireworks" towards the end! I also wonder how good the solicitors were in that first round. However even when they were good, e.g. for Seema Misra, that didn't help :-( Regarding referring the case to the CPS. Most solicitors don't know you can do that. So a concession to the Justice committee is that at some point in the future defendants have to be told they can do that.

[@hearthetruththeonrecordpod4430]

Pleased you enjoyed it. More interviews are in the offing so please do watch out for them!