faraj moussa yikes. Imagine having to put all the settings on low to try to make the intel cpu look bad. Thats like doing graphics comparison against the 2080ti all on low settings lowest resolution just to try to show its better because of diminishing returns when in reality its not that case at all. Pathetic.
@@officialrealamogus That's a pity, because you can do a lot more with an Athlon 3000G. I have one, just for fun (like watching RUclips), and I love this "little" thing. :)
I turned every setting to high. With my 8700k/2080 I average somewhere in the 70s at 1440p. You're right. Game isn't optimized badly, it's just suffering from Crysis syndrome where the game engine just does too much for current GPUs to handle.
5 лет назад+3099
The I9 9900K is so bad it even loses to the Athlon 3000G! I'm kidding, please don't kill me...
@@IWoVex yes, when you think about it, it is. But hoppefully if you wan't to game the i9 is leagues above the athlon 3000g :) it would be sad otherwise xD
As a low budget gamer, I've always deeply appreciated AMD developing such solid integrated graphics compared to intel, even in their low end chips. This is a bit of a silly comparison, but nonetheless highlights AMD's different approach here.
Pretty impressive to see that you COULD play half way modern games without GPUs. No matter who makes it at whocares what pricepoint. Its been 17 years since we got the first proper dedicated GPUs and you can play games without them by just using what little you have inside your CPUs, even though they were never meant for that.
Too bad the iGPU can only play at 720p in order to get a good enough frame rate. I think you could set the resolution to 1080p in light games like CS:GO or games dating back to late 2000s. The latter can certainly be played in full hd, achieving pretty high frame rates. By the way, some AMD APUs (like the Athlon 200GE and the 3000G) were meant to be used for light gaming, while Intel HD Graphics are just there for standard video output: this way, if the programs you use don't require a powerful gpu, you could just use the integrated one.
@@ilSerlusca-iS4io Yea, but still ^^ (btw intel IGPU is the main reason why I dont buy Ryzen for now. I have had to use an igpu for multiple reasons many times and their G Series CPUs are way too slow)
@@Waldherz I'm not saying I hate them, they surely are a good option for people who can't afford a dedicated GPU. And as you said, it is impressive how we can play games without spending thousands of (insert currency here). Also, I would like a Ryzen 4600G / 4700G in the next generation, though I know that, in some ways, that wouldn't make sense and therefore I am not expecting them to become a thing.
@@ilSerlusca-iS4io i think it could be a very power full igpu... I dont remember if next AMD gen will be 5nm if its The case... They will be able tô add more than 11 vega unitys in that cpu with a bigger frrquency with a Good cooler in The box that would be Awesome in my country a ryzen 3 3200g is 600R$... And i3 9100f+ a graphics card like gt 1030 is 1200r$... Só if they could make a processor for 1000 that has an igpu better than gt 1030 and The cpu better than The i3 that would be a gooooooddddd thing in country like mine...
Mostly correct, i think there was a really old argument for hybrid gpu acceleration I am not really qualified to talk about and some weird programs like Fusion 360 that are almost entirely cpu locked that have no benefit beyond integrated graphics. Weird world.
AMD seems to be more...balanced. The GPU and CPU loads are more relative to what they ought to be in an ideal scenario (where both of them have something to do be doing so they're not holding the other one back), although it does nothing for actual performance.
@@legend9181 if by better you mean at lower resolutions and by 5-10% then no. AMD cpus are cheaper, cooler, more power efficient and a jack of all trades eg: good at everything.
@@SolidSonicTH 9900k is not meant for gaming without GPU. igpu, is just for faster rendering, basic things, like watching youtube if you are waiting for your gpu delivery, or just checking if cpu is working. Athlon 3000g is super budget cpu, so of course it will be more "balanced". They won't put super fast cores, and then add trash igpu, or add very good igpu, but like 1 cpu corr
@Saigonas Well, I wouldn’t generally game without a dGPU (although I have done it, depending on the scenario). But it’s what’s being tested here so might as well remark on it.
@@thewinner4x873 well this is a joke. but it still is wrong. Even jokes adhere to some kind of logic. except if the joke was about saying an wrong statement, but this wasnt the case here.
Nice comparison. Next add in the 200GE Vega 3 to compare the older Vega 3 with the newer Vega 3 performance. Nobody who buys a 9900k would be using the igpu unless their brain is damaged or got scammed by a seller. Plus if they can afford an i9 then they likely will buy a gpu to go along with it. The 3000G is clearly suited for low end desk work or HTPC setup, replacing the standard dell/lenovo/acer desktop popularly in use currently in most offices. Cheap, no need for a discrete gpu and low power usage.
The frame time is so much smoother on the athlon, despite the cpu itself being significantly weaker. Shows how bad intels graphics are even the newer ones.
To br fair the newer ones are worse than the older ones, the iris ones are the best ones and those are from 2014, they are comparable to a GT1030 power wise. (Or well the iris pro 6200 is)
@@yotoprules9361 it's fine by me had some issues but I've had much worse with nvidia, I haven't used AMD all that much and they are all old cards so never had issues with those.
Step 1 : sell ur i9 9900k Step 2 : buy 10 Atlons 3000G so u can get X10 performance Step 0 : find a motherboard with 10 cpu sockets and get ur self a job so you can afford an i9
I have a i5 9600k, but the iGPU is sometimes could be very handy, for example QuickSync, basically you can use your iGPU to encode your stream, or use it for Adobe Premiere Pro rendering, or if you sold your old videocard and waiting for the new one, you can still use your computer and game with Diablo 2. :D
I think for gaming you wont see the diference between i7 and i9 maybe even with some i5.... Using the same gpu... The cpu its not the main component for gaming
What's more interesting is the power draw, since these iGPUs are meant for multimedia tasks while using much less power then a dGPU (which also begs the question if dGPUs have become efficient enough to no longer require iGPUs in multimedia tasks to keep electricity bills low?).
Thanks for the video. I actually thought the 3000g would do better. I agree with you using the 9900k just to show that this is the best you can expect from uhd630. Just like when people use an rtx 2080ti to test an i5 CPU. Its done to eliminate bottlenecks. In this case you put the uhd630 in the best possible light compared to AMDs entry level budget apu.
This is like watching 2 drivers, the one is a professional race driver with 20+ years of experiece but with a shitty car and the other one is a rich boy with a lamborghini who can't even take turns.
It's a perfect example that system should be well balanced rather than having only few flagship parts. Just how one the flagship chip is getting outperformed by a low budget chip because of bad GPU. *Choose parts wisely*
1. It's intel 2. The athlon is a duo core and they're both probably running on the same cooler, so obviously the 8 core is going to run warmer than the duo core.
Been using intel CPUs for pretty much all of the last 15 years since they were objectively better. Last AMD I bought was the Athlon 64 in roughly 2003. I am happy to see that competition is once more flaring up and that my next purchase will have to be two competitors weighed against each other. But it will be some time still as my 8700k is very capable for a good few more years. All the more time for the two to knife at each other and improve.
@@playdog7804 тут ключевое 30 фпс. Это извращение. Тем более не будет 8к 30фпс стабильные, ты рофлишь? У тя походу нет кансоли. Red dead redemption на кансолях в full hd просадки до 18 фпс. Это еще с посредственной графикой. А на пк с графоном выкрученным 5700xt и рязань 2600 выдают 80-110 в фулке и 60-90 в 2к. (Про 8к ты конечно пошутил)
Uff gracias a Dios. Un señor vino a quererme cambiar mi Athlon 3000G por su i9 9900K, después de ver el vídeo hice lo correcto: quedarme con mi Athlon :)
But in the uneventful mishap your gpu died, and you still need work to do (like reply to emails or write big word documents) getting the display to boot is better than doing it on your phone.
Yes and No. If you want to be able to play games for cheap, the Athlon 300GE is a nice APU. The 9900K is a nice CPU, but it sucks without a dedicated Card.
50$ pour un CPU intéressant en jeu et en application :) mais à mon avis les performances peuvent être meilleurs avec un overclock (c'est possible dessus) de la ram 3200mhz et assigné de la mémoire au IGPU.
if nvidia goes bankrupt and the world runs out of gpus amd could makes their gpus only compatible with their cpus then you would be forced to play on the uhd
I wish people knew about the capabilities of a 9900k after it's paired with a 2080ti . But nice work amd , the athlon 3000g really gave people a ray of hope in getting a cost effective upgrade
You didn't get the point, do you?? It's an integrated graphics comparison, not a CPU. Everyone knows i9 is a superior CPU even i3 is better than 3000G but the point is intel integrated graphics sucks.
Games:
PUBG
Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 01:06
Rainbow Six Siege - 02:11
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 03:08
Project Cars - 04:13
Testing Games lol your trying really hard to try to prove AMD CPUs are better. Gaming on low sub 1080p lmfao. How embarssing this channel has become
@@Tony-yn5rr Intel fanboy?
faraj moussa yikes. Imagine having to put all the settings on low to try to make the intel cpu look bad. Thats like doing graphics comparison against the 2080ti all on low settings lowest resolution just to try to show its better because of diminishing returns when in reality its not that case at all. Pathetic.
@@Tony-yn5rr low settings are to keep FPS higher, so it's easier to tell the difference.
Dear testing games, could you try athlon 3000g + rx 550 by using crossfire between rx 550 and vega3 gpus. Pls try
as a person with an i9 9900k i can confirm that we use integrated graphics instead of a gpu
@@officialrealamogus Can I report you as a no sense comment?
@@officialrealamogus nice comeback
@@officialrealamogus That's a pity, because you can do a lot more with an Athlon 3000G. I have one, just for fun (like watching RUclips), and I love this "little" thing. :)
Ur are absolutely right
@@officialrealamogus -My Athlon 3000G based machine is keeping my old(er) i5 and i7 and Ryzen machines company. :-)
1:35 how 3 fps can change lots of things
at these low fps yes, but in most other cases no.
because average fps is only half the story. Look at that frametime graph, Intel iGPU is stuttering like hell.
I think you can notice the diffrence if its below 25 fps.
Not really the fps, look at the frametime graph, basically the more it spikes up and down, the more stuttering you notice
Is this integrated graphics with no gpu?
This is like watching two 1 legged men in an ass kicking contest
Holy cow we can't describe this any better
No its like watching a 2 man shampooing their bald head
amd has prosthetic leg
Intel : am i a joke to you?
Amd : yes
Ok boomer
r/woooosh
xddddddddddddd
@@hirjimaulidy ahh yes we have an idiot that's stuck in 2019
@@kayinnaidoo7089 lol I agree, this meme needs to die already ffs
so, i can sell my i9 9900k to buy an Athlon 3000G! Thank you very much! I'll make a deal for sure! :)
You could buy like 10 athlons and run them in crossfire
Guys it’s sarcasm 🤦🏽
@@filetsteak5677 sarcasm just flew over Ur head
@@filetsteak5677 LOL idiot thinks it's real.
you will😉
A moment of silence for those who actually sold their i9 and switched to Athlon
@@thennoth2860 sarcasm dude sarcasm
@@VibezVideo who said anyone here was a fanboy
@@thennoth2860 chill your fucking beans dude, why do you care so much.
but wtf someone really did it
And for $450 dollars, they bought RTX 2060.
Assasin's Creed Odessey:We have worst graphic optimization
Red Dead Redemption 2:Hold my bear
😂
Turn the fucking clouds to high.
Cyberpunk 2077 = "having fun before me released"
Hold my horse
I turned every setting to high. With my 8700k/2080 I average somewhere in the 70s at 1440p. You're right. Game isn't optimized badly, it's just suffering from Crysis syndrome where the game engine just does too much for current GPUs to handle.
The I9 9900K is so bad it even loses to the Athlon 3000G!
I'm kidding, please don't kill me...
Well...you are kinda right lol
I like the second part of your comment a lot xDD
The best intel igpu lose the worst amd igpu its kinda funny 😂
@@IWoVex yes, when you think about it, it is. But hoppefully if you wan't to game the i9 is leagues above the athlon 3000g :) it would be sad otherwise xD
@@tobiasg.8532
Yeah sure 😂💔
INTEL: Catch up old man
AMD: 🏎 You thought you had me
dumb as a rock
@@cadillac6095 how am I Dumb Goofy ass nigga
@@ltnationradio8348 You were born that way goofy ass nigga.
@@cadillac6095 you ain't even black tho..
@@cadillac6095 Says the dumb one that can't take a joke
That smooth cinematic 16fps...
It's because of the frame times
@@aadisahni r/
Ps3 dark souls and demon souls flash backs
Actually yes for some reason it does feel smooth
As a low budget gamer, I've always deeply appreciated AMD developing such solid integrated graphics compared to intel, even in their low end chips. This is a bit of a silly comparison, but nonetheless highlights AMD's different approach here.
Pretty impressive to see that you COULD play half way modern games without GPUs.
No matter who makes it at whocares what pricepoint. Its been 17 years since we got the first proper dedicated GPUs and you can play games without them by just using what little you have inside your CPUs, even though they were never meant for that.
Too bad the iGPU can only play at 720p in order to get a good enough frame rate.
I think you could set the resolution to 1080p in light games like CS:GO or games dating back to late 2000s. The latter can certainly be played in full hd, achieving pretty high frame rates.
By the way, some AMD APUs (like the Athlon 200GE and the 3000G) were meant to be used for light gaming, while Intel HD Graphics are just there for standard video output: this way, if the programs you use don't require a powerful gpu, you could just use the integrated one.
@@ilSerlusca-iS4io Yea, but still ^^
(btw intel IGPU is the main reason why I dont buy Ryzen for now. I have had to use an igpu for multiple reasons many times and their G Series CPUs are way too slow)
@@Waldherz I'm not saying I hate them, they surely are a good option for people who can't afford a dedicated GPU. And as you said, it is impressive how we can play games without spending thousands of (insert currency here).
Also, I would like a Ryzen 4600G / 4700G in the next generation, though I know that, in some ways, that wouldn't make sense and therefore I am not expecting them to become a thing.
@@ilSerlusca-iS4io Never thought you hated them. And yea, a 4700G with a very very small version of that igpu would be really nice :)
@@ilSerlusca-iS4io i think it could be a very power full igpu... I dont remember if next AMD gen will be 5nm if its The case... They will be able tô add more than 11 vega unitys in that cpu with a bigger frrquency with a Good cooler in The box that would be Awesome in my country a ryzen 3 3200g is 600R$... And i3 9100f+ a graphics card like gt 1030 is 1200r$... Só if they could make a processor for 1000 that has an igpu better than gt 1030 and The cpu better than The i3 that would be a gooooooddddd thing in country like mine...
Intel with the blue car and AMD with the red car as it should be
69 likes lmao
And you can extract more performance from athlon removing tassellation, adding 3200mhz ram instead and overclocking the igpu.
plus window tweaks and sqeeze a bit more.
@@LOOTLORD605 and you can't do that with intel
And you can extract more performance from i9 by adding GPU, overclocking cpu to 5GHz, removing hypeethreading
@@Saigonas if you have only 400$?
@@fabiotiburzi omfg, 9900k isnt for budget gamers. And athlon 3000g isnt mid range gamers. Even for 450$ you can get ryzen 1600 and rx 570 build
Intel integrated graphics card is a waste of die space.
Mostly correct, i think there was a really old argument for hybrid gpu acceleration I am not really qualified to talk about and some weird programs like Fusion 360 that are almost entirely cpu locked that have no benefit beyond integrated graphics. Weird world.
ikr
@@Bajicoy intel has a history of paying developers to not use feautures that other brands have.
@@urielalbertodiazreynoso6309 I don't doubt companies want to have biased marketing but it seems like a random thing to say here.
@@urielalbertodiazreynoso6309 so.. i must sell my intel system and buy AMD based system ?
3:25 5 more frames and it feels like playing RDR on the PS3.
Lmao
Ps4 you mean because is the same shit
Lol it won't even run 480p at more then 5 FPS the athlon is 15x more powerful then a PS3 and tests show it
@@Trollflen noooooooooooo
He meant PS3
PS4 is good it can run 1080p 60 fps
Idiots commenting first like its a life achievement. Pathetic.
Also, nice work AMD
AMD seems to be more...balanced. The GPU and CPU loads are more relative to what they ought to be in an ideal scenario (where both of them have something to do be doing so they're not holding the other one back), although it does nothing for actual performance.
Intel is still better at gaming for CPUs
@@legend9181 if by better you mean at lower resolutions and by 5-10% then no. AMD cpus are cheaper, cooler, more power efficient and a jack of all trades eg: good at everything.
@@SolidSonicTH 9900k is not meant for gaming without GPU. igpu, is just for faster rendering, basic things, like watching youtube if you are waiting for your gpu delivery, or just checking if cpu is working.
Athlon 3000g is super budget cpu, so of course it will be more "balanced". They won't put super fast cores, and then add trash igpu, or add very good igpu, but like 1 cpu corr
@Saigonas Well, I wouldn’t generally game without a dGPU (although I have done it, depending on the scenario). But it’s what’s being tested here so might as well remark on it.
Intel: Dude I almost had you.
AMD: You almost had me?
More appropriate heading:
UHD 630 vs Vega 3
@El Gamer Edgar nobody buys a 9900k for its integrated GPU lol they usually pair it up with a 2080ti
@@Ahtisham_Aziz true
@@Ahtisham_Aziz man just chill out We are having fun up here.
@@Ahtisham_Aziz That's true unless we are talking about pre-builts and OEMs
@@Ahtisham_Aziz 4 the views buddy
Intel: This is my best igpu..
AMD: 🙄😳😲.....🤔🤨😁🤭
actually iris is their best igpu lineup
@@Kaiserin_Amy yes but this is a joke and i don't want to use woosh anymore so i will let you go
@@thewinner4x873 well this is a joke. but it still is wrong. Even jokes adhere to some kind of logic. except if the joke was about saying an wrong statement, but this wasnt the case here.
@@Kaiserin_Amy
You have achieved comedy
@@SacapuntasDeMetal nice
Nice comparison. Next add in the 200GE Vega 3 to compare the older Vega 3 with the newer Vega 3 performance.
Nobody who buys a 9900k would be using the igpu unless their brain is damaged or got scammed by a seller. Plus if they can afford an i9 then they likely will buy a gpu to go along with it. The 3000G is clearly suited for low end desk work or HTPC setup, replacing the standard dell/lenovo/acer desktop popularly in use currently in most offices. Cheap, no need for a discrete gpu and low power usage.
Yeah
You got it the wrong way pal, this was just for entertainment and fun it is obvious nobody will use that igpu in games
you would be surprised with what people will use with a 9900K though when they realise they spent all there budget on CPU+cooler
yeah, but this was made only to compare igpu with igpu
instaed of that i9 I'll take the ryzen 9 3900x
When a 50$ IGPU beats a 500$ iGPU lmao
The igpu Is not meant to be the main feature, so writing it as a 500$, just for the igpu is incorrect
@@ybr8192 r/woooosh
@@carbonN R/wooosh
@@Hydrasito r/ihavereddit
@@ybr8192 xDD
The frame time is so much smoother on the athlon, despite the cpu itself being significantly weaker.
Shows how bad intels graphics are even the newer ones.
yotoprules yes, because everyone plays with no gpu. And the i9-9900k totally isn’t the best gaming cpu for pure frames.
@@themooingtree5163 totally missed the point here my friend
To br fair the newer ones are worse than the older ones, the iris ones are the best ones and those are from 2014, they are comparable to a GT1030 power wise.
(Or well the iris pro 6200 is)
@@tilburg8683
I also found intels drivers are horrible, and they barely work. Just many problems.
@@yotoprules9361 it's fine by me had some issues but I've had much worse with nvidia, I haven't used AMD all that much and they are all old cards so never had issues with those.
The Athlon in Project Cars did really well :O
Yay I can sell my 9900k and buy 5 athlons and run then on SLI, that will definitely give me more FPS
Jk plz dont kill me
U need to build a custom motherboard for it
That's crossfire not SLI
I know this is a joke but SLI is NVIDIA dumbo
Rift Electro are you stupid i said i know this a joke. and that is not even the right subreddit
lmfao u deleted ur commet
u really can buy 2-Socker mb on aliexpress, but i think u won't hide it on am3, just 1366, or 1150, maybe g34
That little graph thing goes crazy high and looks unsmooth on the Intel side
Great video, i was gonna buy a 500$ cpu to use with it's apu lol. Thanks you saved my buck.
Step 1 : sell ur i9 9900k
Step 2 : buy 10 Atlons 3000G so u can get X10 performance
Step 0 : find a motherboard with 10 cpu sockets and get ur self a job so you can afford an i9
Step 3: You got no money left for an GPU
step -1: buy a ryzen
Idk why but this video had me laughing the whole time....great video 👍
good job, you've proven that buying $500 cpu for gaming makes no sense without dedicated gpu
ty captain obvious
You are talking as if people debate in favor of it and tell that it makes sense. Literally everyone knows this.
@@sarthaksaswatdas2846 you never know tho :)
I have a i5 9600k, but the iGPU is sometimes could be very handy, for example QuickSync, basically you can use your iGPU to encode your stream, or use it for Adobe Premiere Pro rendering, or if you sold your old videocard and waiting for the new one, you can still use your computer and game with Diablo 2. :D
I think for gaming you wont see the diference between i7 and i9 maybe even with some i5.... Using the same gpu... The cpu its not the main component for gaming
A $500 CPU shouldn't be beaten by a $50 one in any type of usage scenario.
are you serious
the 3950x would also be beaten in the igpu area, nobody going to buy a 500€ cpu and not have a gpu
Well the high end cpu of AMD don't even have igpu so if you compare it with anything it will lose lmao
Btw you are idiot
@ً except if you are doing some kind of cpu heavy workload that doesn't benefit from gpu acceleration
@@giathuanleviet4138 that was the whole point of the comment. Btw Grow Up Kid.
I just woke up and I thought I misread the title. Lol
What's more interesting is the power draw, since these iGPUs are meant for multimedia tasks while using much less power then a dGPU (which also begs the question if dGPUs have become efficient enough to no longer require iGPUs in multimedia tasks to keep electricity bills low?).
When you spent all your money on Intel CPUs you end up like this
It's like driving a Porsche 911 and Prius in a bumper to bumper traffic
sees this video
dad: *see son we don't need to spend hundreds of dollars on a brand-new cpu for your computer*
Intel- How much fun do you want to make of me ?
AMD- *Yes..*
Imagine thinking that the expense cpu must have really good integrated graphics and then realizing the 3000 G has way better integrated graphics
noone buying an i9 9900k is gonna use it with no gpu unless its a work pc.
capo, como grabaste el mismo gameplay del pubg con diferentes procesadores y siendo iguales los videos?
the fact that athlon 3000G temp is less than i9 suprised me ( even though the cpu usage is higher ) AMD you rock 🔥
80% of 35 watts is still less than 30% of 200 watts, also they both report temps differently, so you should know that.
The thumbnail was so subtle. Was I only the one to notice it ?
That's why Intel bribe entire AMD Vega division
Thanks for the video. I actually thought the 3000g would do better. I agree with you using the 9900k just to show that this is the best you can expect from uhd630. Just like when people use an rtx 2080ti to test an i5 CPU. Its done to eliminate bottlenecks. In this case you put the uhd630 in the best possible light compared to AMDs entry level budget apu.
Just sold my 9900k for the athlon 3000g. Can't wait!
Should've realize that you could've just gotten a dedicated GPU...
@Jose Garcia
I think this guy was joking
This is like watching 2 drivers, the one is a professional race driver with 20+ years of experiece but with a shitty car and the other one is a rich boy with a lamborghini who can't even take turns.
great idea of this video, keep going :)
It's a perfect example that system should be well balanced rather than having only few flagship parts.
Just how one the flagship chip is getting outperformed by a low budget chip because of bad GPU.
*Choose parts wisely*
This is how Intel play with peoples emotion..!
Amd:why r u gei
Intel:who says im gei
Amd:u r gei.
Please the same video, but with the highest settings.
Ac Odyssey will run at 0 fps... And most of the other games will run in 5-10 fps...
@@bloodcaster1862 no jajaja i think they will crash
@@intivm Yeah most probably!😂😂I mean who the hell will use the integrated graphics of these CPU's to play games at highest settings?! 😂😂
It won't even run haha
What cooler did you use on this 9900k?
1:18 Athlon 3000g: i am more than enough for gaming in 2020. I'm better than i9, buy me!
"but if you have a 9900k then you definitely have a graphics card as well!"
Yes, thank you so much for pointing out the obvious. Have a nice day
Athlon 3000G at 80%-100% reaches 40°C
i9 9900K at 25% reaches 50°C
What
yeah its because of the power consumption
1. It's intel
2. The athlon is a duo core and they're both probably running on the same cooler, so obviously the 8 core is going to run warmer than the duo core.
what were the memory speeds used on the rigs?
i wanna see what 5900 XT gonna bring to the table
Athlon is a beast. I'm tempted to buy one to make a mini PC for the living room.
15 FPS
And athlon is beast
Lol you people so pooooor
I am not rich but at least i am not poor like you
Thinking 15 FPS is beast
Is this recorded with a capture card
Even if it wasn't, still proves a much broader point!
Doge br
It's not a joke video, it is a valid comparison of the iGPUs.
@@Nuxi10. lol this guy so funny
@@Nuxi10. kakaakakakakaka
Can wait for 9900k or i7 1065G7 vs Ryzen 4800u. Great videos. Yes the CPU usage is not bad for 3000G only two cores 4 Threads vs Intel 8 cores.
Intel's igpu sucks. So I recommend buying an intel cpu with letter 'f' in it and buy a discrete gpu or just buy chad AMD.
Intel sucks at everything lol
Not anymore. Their newest igpu that showed up a few days ago is on par with AMD
@@kriskraken9747 vyes. On par with AMD vega 3 graphics.
@L1veSteel ah yes comparing the cpu of athlon and an i9
F stands for Forget (the gpu)
When you order a i9 9900k computer but you forget the gpu
What a way to start 2020.
This aged well
GPU: Need backup!
AMD igpu: On your left!
Meanwhile
GPU: Need backup!
Intel igpu: Need backup!
Best comment lol
Ahahaha so true
just imagin the 3400g😂😂 oh intel y bad boyy
Yeah because of the igpu thd igpu makes it better
What cooler are you using??
This is why i don't have big hopes for Intel's upcoming gpu...
R3 2200G : "Ya'll Suck"
people using i9 integrated gpu be like :
*my goals are beyond your understanding*
This hella good stuff!
How to cool your pc:
Stock cooler: X
Vodka: X
Watercool: X
Athlon with decidated gpu: ✅
Intel: are u free?i am expeensive(500$)
Amd: 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣really? Yeh i am free.
The human eye can only hear 12gb of ram.
You are using your eye to hear?what a stupid ass
@@OmPrakash-pc1ec don't you understand that is a joke, well I do and I like it.
@@OmPrakash-pc1ec r/woooooooooosh
@@OmPrakash-pc1ec r/woooosh
Been using intel CPUs for pretty much all of the last 15 years since they were objectively better. Last AMD I bought was the Athlon 64 in roughly 2003.
I am happy to see that competition is once more flaring up and that my next purchase will have to be two competitors weighed against each other. But it will be some time still as my 8700k is very capable for a good few more years. All the more time for the two to knife at each other and improve.
Catonzo sell your 8700k right now and get a ryzen 7 3700x or ryzen 9 3900x/3950x because in the next few years the 8700k will drop in the price a lot
@@renko8065 I don't sell hardware. I keep it after upgrading and either give it away to family/friends or use it myself for spare parts.
Кансольщики говорят что 30фпс норм. Вот пусть пк за 3 копейки собирают и на встройке играют.
@@playdog7804 тут ключевое 30 фпс. Это извращение. Тем более не будет 8к 30фпс стабильные, ты рофлишь? У тя походу нет кансоли. Red dead redemption на кансолях в full hd просадки до 18 фпс. Это еще с посредственной графикой. А на пк с графоном выкрученным 5700xt и рязань 2600 выдают 80-110 в фулке и 60-90 в 2к. (Про 8к ты конечно пошутил)
@@playdog7804 ага))) а чего 8к всего-лишь?))) я обычно в 128к играю))) ахахах
@@playdog7804 на консолях фейковые эти к. Сталкаша на тебя не хватает...
Stimul 67 то чувство когда игры создаются компьютером для консоли 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Stimul 67 на консолях даже 1440p нету у про шки 1080p
Uff gracias a Dios. Un señor vino a quererme cambiar mi Athlon 3000G por su i9 9900K, después de ver el vídeo hice lo correcto: quedarme con mi Athlon :)
So what was the point of this video ?
"iGPUs Sucks"
Yep, definitely need a dedicated gpu for higher performance
But in the uneventful mishap your gpu died, and you still need work to do (like reply to emails or write big word documents) getting the display to boot is better than doing it on your phone.
Yes and No. If you want to be able to play games for cheap, the Athlon 300GE is a nice APU. The 9900K is a nice CPU, but it sucks without a dedicated Card.
Gameplayers: we need quality
Gamers: we need fps
My eyes melted when they ran Assassins Creed Odyssey
A moment of silence for people who actually bought I9 9900k...
Athlon 3000g: calle an ambulance!!
...but not for me
Imagine Having 9900K and playing Games on its IGPU
Rainbow is so good optimized and Looks so good
Rdr 2 on dx12? why not on vulkan?
Athlon 3000G better than i9 9900K
Confirmed
3:13 включена высокая тесселяция, эта функция очень жрёт ресурсы, если хочется её включит, то максимум на низкие настройки
Amd was going through a hard time back then, being ridiculed for being worse than intel,
well look who's laughing now
2:39
I9900K Uses 28% of the CPU 3000G %100 He's using it, but you only pay $50 a day.
CPU Usage:
am I a joke to you?
Yeah
Yes you are a fucking joke LoL
Go to ryzen cpu usage better
@@codox0074 nobody asked for this
@@raqtty oh k
Stuck with the igpu on my i9 until my 2080 super goes through the postal office.
Seems decent enough for an igpu.
That's because you haven't seen the vega 11
Mateo José Guerra
Yeah but that’s an apu not a cpu .... igpu is not the same as an apu
This is decent enough for igpu.
cpu I9: 10-20%
cpu athlon: 95%
Check the temperature bro, intel got fever when fight with athlon😂
@@JeffriRanger and what lol u think a 35 watt CPU is gonna get as hot a 125 watt CPU(don't quote me that's an estimate
But wait, if you have money for a i9-9900k, you have money for a gpu too?😂
Great job Intel
Now I'm AMD's fan
uh what
INTEL:Am I fucked by my self?
AMD:Of course.
If someone buys a i9 has the money to buy a gpu 😂😂
Lol I can buy a new pc that cost likely an i9
Pre-builds (and parents buying a computer for their kid don’t even know what a GPU is), it happens a lot sadly...
There are a ton of prebuilts with i9s without any gpu
Cyberspino Link us an OEM selling an i9 without a GPU then I’ll believe you
Not neccesarily
Welcome to this video! Enjoy watching the wonderful sight of a $50 CPU integrated graphics kick the shit out of a i9 $500 CPU!
50$ pour un CPU intéressant en jeu et en application :) mais à mon avis les performances peuvent être meilleurs avec un overclock (c'est possible dessus) de la ram 3200mhz et assigné de la mémoire au IGPU.
Athlon: Yeah, I am winning.
9900k: It's just my %10 power.
Ну а зачем тогда нужна встроенная графика?
Её берут те, кто не хотят покупать видеокарту.
@@Nurnberg-wu7uq Remember, no Russian
What you don't think of is that the I9 isn't made to run alone... Who buys a 500$ CPU without a beefy GPU ? (except morons)
if nvidia goes bankrupt and the world runs out of gpus amd could makes their gpus only compatible with their cpus then you would be forced to play on the uhd
except people who use it for work?
@@WinterSnowism yeah but then they dont GAME on it (and if u want to work get a threadripper)
@@humanwall8266 lmao good point
Well the purpose was to prove the uhd suck so go buy a gpu
I wish people knew about the capabilities of a 9900k after it's paired with a 2080ti . But nice work amd , the athlon 3000g really gave people a ray of hope in getting a cost effective upgrade
🤦🏻♂️
You didn't get the point, do you?? It's an integrated graphics comparison, not a CPU.
Everyone knows i9 is a superior CPU even i3 is better than 3000G but the point is intel integrated graphics sucks.