ya olum adam da demiş ki "türklerin aslında gerçekten geri çekilmediğini farkettiğinde gelen pişmanlık hissi" lafı niye götünden anlıyosun bizi millete rezil ediyosun@@davutinat
Who in their right mind would chase a nomadic force on foot? Even chasing them with cavalry was a big mistake, they literally committed a medieval suicide lol..
Two excellent shots here: - javelin throw at 0:32; pay attention how heavy it was. - lance thrust at 0:45; excellent example of range advantage. We rarely see movies with such amount of weapon-realism.
they depicted vikings as civilised while nomads as some sort of cave man in this movie but Khazars were already established cosmopolit empire when Rus started their raids
@@TronUse999Bruh, houses were not something new, especially with all the influence from the persia and the byzantine. Tent cities were mostly present in conquest campaigns.
@@Ahmet-vl2ph Yeah pretty much. But I don't understand the later part "with themselves". Do you mean among themselves. Then it is the Ottomans. They had, only the best, forged by fire, survival of the fittest schtick. Do you mean against each other? Well that applies for EVERYONE.
That is not “wolf trap” there ia no trap in the video. This is basic encirclement. For “wolf trap” you have to fake retreat and lure enemy into your trap.
O dönem eski Türk uygarlığının zirvesi Uygur Kağanlığındaydı. Müzik, edebiyat, resim ve aristokrat yaşamın Türkçe kolundaki en yüksek örneklerini verdiler. Batıdaki Oğuz ve Peçenek grupları ise daha kabileci anlayışla yaşayan, görece daha cahil kalmış gruplardı. Zaten bu yüzden Peçenekler yok oldu, Oğuzlar da Rum ve Fars nüfusu içinde eridiler. Bir halkın aristokrat sınıfı yaratabilmesi o halkın kültürünün ve ulusal çıkarlarının çağlar boyu var olabilmesi için önemlidir. Yoksa tarih dalgalarının arasında yok olup gider. Bugünkü Türkiye'de de aristokrat sınıfı olmadığı için ülke yol geçen hanı oldu. Herkes kafasına göre takılıyor. Ulusal bir politika yok. Araplaşma ve bilinçsiz batılılaşma aynı anda fırtına gibi yeni nesilleri biçiyor.
These war tactics of the steppe geography have become the nightmare of the enemies. This culture of commanding larger armies is based on speed, ambush and damage infliction tactics on the battlefield. Geography is destiny.
Nope, Norsemen knew ZERO about Turkic hordes. They were seperated by some 2 Europe big land mass. Only when Vikings went as far east as Ukraine and Turkic hordes migrated as far west as Ukraine then they met. Same applies for Turkic hordes and Muslim Arabs.
@@otgunz They had an ongoing trade and diplomatic relations at least as early as first Gokturk Khanate if not older. Turks also had the same with Eastern Romans and many of them immigrated to Eastern Roman lands long before Islam came to them. Arabs knew of them due to Silk Road but didn’t have any official relations. Norse religion is almost identical to Turkic religion of that time. They even use the same Runes in writing. Those fairy tales talking about Turks coming out of nowhere to raid the world is just a myth to scare commoners in medieval Europe. Also a good excuse for defeats…
@@otgunz They knew who they were for sure but i would agree they had limited connection. Entire ancient world from Spain to China knew horselords, for example there are ancient Chinese, Hebrew, Greek and Roman records about Turkic people but ofc they are often ignored in the west even by historians not just some media productions sadly. Turks were an enemy of the west and westerners always like showing them as barbarians even if they actually had large complex empires..
From what i understand, these are suppose to be kievan rus. These are not norse/nordic people, they might be considered vikings, because is not a culture thing, it’s just like calling someone a pirate, anyone can be pirate. But what we associate as vikings, Kievan rus is not it.
@@TheRealRealMClovin If they are Kievan Rus, there is no chance they would be surprised by a Turk attack. It happens almost once a week over there back then…
there was never mongol army. They were Turkic Tatars (or Tartars as they were known for Europe), unrelated to Khalkhas pig herders, who relocated to Mongolia, previously populated by Turkic tribes (Qıyat, Börü Tegin, Nayman, Kereit united by Tatar name), from Syberian forests in the late 16th century. Khalkhas (C gaplogroup) have no relation to Cengiz Han (R1b gaplogroup) and didn't know neither about him, nor about horses until 20th century. The only "mongolian" tribe that was nomadic are Oirats, though they were tought horse riding by Turkic tribes in 16 century.
This is so dumb cuz there are large cosmopolit empires like Khazar and Cuman-Kipchak Khaganates So depicting Turkic tribes as like Indians is kinda inaccurate
to be fair though, europeans quickly ended up learning how to deal with the horsement of the steppes and during their second invasion into Hungary they were crushed so severely that they never even considdered trying it again, bela IVth had been criticised heavily for his inabillity to effectively counter them during the first invasion so he set to work fixing that but would not experience the second one himself he mostly just had castles built, reinforced and ordnances enforced for what to do in case of an enemy army, farmers would harvest all they could and would bring it all to the castle where the entire local population would take shelter. nomadic hordes were such fast and effective campaigners because they didn't need a large supply train, they would mostly live of the land , they couldn't that time around and ended up trying to besiege some castles, maybe taking one or two but at an unacceptable cost. meanwhile the king of hungary mustered his proffesionalised army and marched to crush the two mongol armies destroying one entirely and the other broke apart and fled. soon after the mongols would lose more and more influence in that region whilst also losing their edge in the middle east as the mamluks chose to fight fire with fire and use the horseback archers and lancers against them (the latter was also done by europeans, and effectively so in the end but horseback archery never really cought on in most of europe, instead heavily armored crossbowmen, bowmen and infantry tended to take the main stage allongside knights which were the most heavily armored warriors of their age, (so basically they just outranged the mongols with foot archers and crossbowmen and if they got to close they would face heavily armored infantry and be charged by the tanks of their age (the mongols were no doubt more skilled as general horsemen but they rode light hardy ponies, european knights were so heavy they rode massive warhorses that by themselves were worth more than most people would have earned in their lifetime perhaps even several, they were not even ridden on the journey, knights would ride a common sadle horse and would mount their warhorses only for battle or perhaps also for tourneys
Yes quickly....that is after numerous invasions over the course of nearly 2 centuries losing many battles with fair ease. I wouldn't say quickly I would simply say they adapted in fair time and even as they did they still faced many defeats at their hands, a large aspect for such victory however in the latter periods would be technology at later periods and the fact many Steppe Nomads weren't as organised nor developed as they were during the Mongol periods where they were more centralised.
@@tauempire1793lol europeans “learned” how to deal with steppe riders , not counting turkomans raiding and absolutely dominating the battlefield up until late 1300’s in Balkans. Even in the battle of mohacs steppe cavalry was able to use the ancient techniques to trick hungarian army into the carnage.
@@tauempire1793 I suggest you learn history better. There were only a handful of battles that the steppe horsemen won "with fair ease". And it didn't last 2 centuries for the mighty Europeans to learn how to adapt. It took them at most or less than a century. Compleo.
Uropians ??😂😂 hungars are turk we are same peaple under leader ship if Atilla the hun but no urope never learnt its just that turkic peaple fought in between each other more than enemy so that they kept destroying one another.
@@mongoliankhan6351konuşma. Sen sahtekarmısın? Moğol bizim küçük kuzenimiz. Çengiz Han Türkdür. Atila Han Türkdür. Metehanlar Teomanlar. Bize karşı gelme bizle takıl. Büyük Cengiz hanın ordusu 90% has Türkdür
The Decimal System was established for the first time in the Turkish Asian Hun Empire by Emperor Mete Han in 209 BC, according to the 10-member organizational system. It is accepted as the founding date of the Turkish Armies and Turkish Land Forces.
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 500, don't make me laugh, 16 Turkish Empires were established, take a look at the years of establishment of these states: ) These empires are respectively the Great Hun, the Western Hun, the European Hun, the White Hun, the Göktürk, the Avar, the Hazar, the Uyghur, the Karahan, the Ghaznavids, the Great Seljuk, the Khwarezmshahs, the Golden Horde, Timur, Babur and the Ottoman.
@@Serkanizm_TR You can't tell apart Turkic and Turkish?😹 Living on the Far East they even look different; also Hazar kaganate of it's first stage had Russian majority which makes it one of Russian states; and apparently Hunnu people are considered as turkic only by turk people but they related with Uralic and slavic as well; btw Uyghur language was created on basis of Chagatai language which is not turkic As you see, if we just take a closer look most of your writing doesn't even related to turkic type😅
Turkmens and Mongols were raised as hunters since their child hood. They were naturally knights and archers and mastered ambushes although they were very brave. They weren't brave fools like Viking berserkers and used their battle rage only when they ran out of tricks
trust me I read a lot of times where the Turks used this tactic and it worked in the balkans and anatolia. My favorite was in 1071 battle of Malazkirt when the Turks first set foot in Anatolia.
Well when you have a culture that priorities dying in glory then winning well your troops are gonna make stupid decisions in the name of glory That's why we still have Turks in modern day but no one calls northern people Norse anymore
As we say in Turkiye, "they kiss you" (öperler), in a satirical way. :) Tengri biz menen, or, The Skygod is with us! :) And it is so sad today grandsons of Vikings are Christian, grandsons of Turkic Oghuz hordes are Muslim...
They can build that empire is simply by putting religious ideology together and melted into their way of life and politics. Unlike u pathetic atheist who blames anything to the religion because it doesn't suit ur pathetic ideology.
Vikings is the biggest lie in history The Vikings were only dangerous for the Europeans, but they broke and fled against the Persians, Turks, Mongols, and Arabs.
bad. If you are going to describe the Turkish warrior. They will have long braided hair. They He will have a Börk on his head and a fur or leather armor on his back. He will use a medium sized curved sword or mostly a war mace. When you say Turks, you are talking about a tribe that introduced tens, hundreds and thousands of troops into the army system before the Romans, and who gave order to China, Asia and Eurasia for centuries. If you're going to do a job, do it properly.
That battle taxtic still usen even roday by the Turkish army and Azerbayjan armu used it recently against to Armenians. it called as "Crescent Tactic" or "Trap of the Wolves". Ottoman Tueks named it is crescent and ancient Turks named it as Trao of the Wolves. Wolves to same exact thing when they are hunting or fighring against ro something. Tiday thw Tuekish army does the same thing with tanks, attack helicopters, special forces, artilary etc. in the ground and even with the fighting jets on the sky or nattle ahips etc. naval force in the sea.
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 Turks lost almost all wars against the Russians, largely because Russians only attacked Turks when Turks were already being attacked by European powers on at least two other fronts. Here is another interesting fact: Russia sent military aid to Turks during the Liberation War that was fought right after WWI ended. It had a significant impact as Mustafa Kemal Pasha's soldiers were largely ill-equipped.
Türkler savaşın tanrısıdır METE HAN, CENGİZ HAN,BİLGE KAĞAN,ATTİLA, KÜRŞAT,İSTEMİ YABGU,EMİR TİMUR, SELÇUK BEY,FATİH SULTAN MEHMET, YAVUZ SULTAN SELİM VEEE YÜCE LİDER MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK 🇭🇺🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇲🇳
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 Turkish history is more than 3000 years, only the Ottomans lasted 623 years and the Seljuks before them lasted 300 years, also the first state with the word Turk in its name was the Gokturk State, it was also founded in the 500s.
This technique belongs to the iranian, which is called Partizani, Turan is also a land of Iranian race and Iranian language Iranian culture, not Turkish.
@@TulparozkanThree thousand years ago, even the Mongols did not exist😂😂😂😂Three thousand years ago, Aryan tribes had migrated to the Iranian plateau, and Persians and Medes had just emerged.
The Comanches on the Texas plains fought in the same way, and it was only after 1842, when the new and revolutionary Colt's Pattern 1836 Belt Revolving Pistol became available and the Texas Rangers and other US militia units were able to fight their way out of encirclement using sheer volume of fire.
Vikings(Varegians on that case) build(conquered) their citys on the ruins of Turkic lands,. Kiev was Scythians(Iranic) and later passed to Gokturks, Hunic(Avars) Bulgarians(of Volga) to Vikings
Iranians are not nomads, this is a ridiculous fabrication. Scythians are of Turkic origin. Herodotus mentions Scythians in his narratives and describes the culture of the same nomadic Turks.
Take a look at the tomb of Kubrat, Khan of Bulgaria, and then look at the tamga of the Kayi tribe! You will see that it is the same! Bulgarians assimilated
The continuation of the Sakas is the Hun Empire. After the Huns comes the Turkish Khaganate.And every tribe that migrated to Europe comes from the Huns.
@@grkngrkn3177 Sulimirski 1985, pp. 149-153: "During the first half of the first millennium B.C., c. 3,000 to 2,500 years ago, the southern part of Eastern Europe was occupied mainly by peoples of Iranian stock .... The main Iranian-speaking peoples of the region at that period were the Scyths and the Sarmatians ...." Melyukova 1990, pp. 97-98: "From the end of the 7th century B.C. to the 4th century B.C. the Central- Eurasian steppes were inhabited by two large groups of kin Iranian-speaking tribes - the Scythians and Sarmatians ...." Melyukova 1990, p. 117: "All contemporary historians, archeologists and linguists are agreed that ... the Scythian and Sarmatian tribes were of the Iranian linguistic group ...." Davis-Kimball, Bashilov & Yablonsky 1995, p. 91: "Near the end of the 19th century V.F. Miller (1886, 1887) theorized that the Scythians and their kindred, the Sauromatians, were Iranian-speaking peoples. This has been a popular point of view and continues to be accepted in linguistics and historical science ...." Jacobson 1995, pp. 31-32: "Whatever their ultimate origins, by the time the Pontic Scythians settled in the region of the Black Sea, they almost certainly spoke an Iranian language ...." Batty 2007, p. 205: "The original Scythians, as far as we can tell, were Iranian-speaking nomadic pastoralists." Ivantchik 2018: "Scythians, a nomadic people of Iranian origin ...." Dandamayev 1994, p. 37: "In modern scholarship the name 'Sakas' is reserved for the ancient tribes of northern and eastern Central Asia and Eastern Turkestan to distinguish them from the related Massagetae of the Aral region and the Scythians of the Pontic steppes. These tribes spoke Iranian languages, and their chief occupation was nomadic pastoralism." Harmatta 1996, p. 181: "[B]oth Cimmerians and Scythians were Iranian peoples." Sulimirski 1985, pp. 149-153: "During the first half of the first millennium B.C., c. 3,000 to 2,500 years ago, the southern part of Eastern Europe was occupied mainly by peoples of Iranian stock ;.... [T]he population of ancient Scythia was far from being homogeneous, nor were the Scyths themselves a homogeneous people. The country called after them was ruled by their principal tribe, the 'Royal Scyths' (Her. iv. 20), who were of Iranian stock and called themselves 'Skolotoi' ...." West 2002, pp. 437-440: "[T]rue Scyths seems to be those whom [Herodotus] calls Royal Scyths, that is, the group who claimed hegemony ... apparently warrior-pastoralists. It is generally agreed, from what we know of their names, that these were people of Iranian stock ...." Rolle 1989, p. 56: "The physical characteristics of the Scythians correspond to their cultural affiliation: their origins place them within the group of Iranian peoples." Rostovtzeff 1922, p. 13: "The Scythian kingdom ... was succeeded in the Russian steppes by an ascendancy of various Sarmatian tribes - Iranians, like the Scythians themselves." Minns 1913, p. 36: "The general view is that both agricultural and nomad Scythians were Iranian."
@@romanromeo8527Ну да, ну да, так брали что даже не обстреливали и омон тащили за собой. Надеялись на переворот, но вы выбрали самый болезненный путь. Итог для вас будет грустным, но, черт подери, заслуженным.
@@Thuthispainfulони выбрали путь достойный восхищения. Противиться агрессору который больше и богаче очень не просто. Украинский народ волей доказал что все разведки мира были не правы. Что интересно, большинство украинской элиты не сбежало. Даже Порошенко с автоматом в руках патрулировал баррикады, а его ведь Зеленский намеревался посадить. Весь народ поднялся на защиту отечества, а Москва потеряла уже даже тех кто не был за Европу. Неизвестно кто победит, но мы все знаем противостояние Греков / Персов. Любой мужчина поддержит такую отвагу, ведь противится сильному это очень тяжело. Я надеюсь Украина выстоит и мы все сможем восхищаться их отвагой.
@@BrodyMarody Арестович тут давеча рассказывал что у них в подразделениях до 70% отказников, людей как мышей на улицах ловят что бы на фронт отправить, женщины скоро в штурмы пойдут, действительно путь достойный восхищения
Turks and vikings have encountered many times in history: Huns (Attila), Avars, Pechenegs, Cuman Kipchaks, and the last one is the Battle of Manzikert... In the Battle of Manzikert, the elite units of the Byzantine army were the Viking Berserkers, and in this war, the Byzantine army numbered two hundred thousand people, and the Seljuk army numbered fifty thousand people. In the Battle of Manzikert, the Seljuks literally passed through the Byzantine army. Vikings never had a chance against the Turks at any time in history. I'm not saying it, history is saying it...
@BenMarshall-g8i Not only for this reason. Steppe wolves cannot be taken into captivity. They travel in packs. They had a hierarchy and social order within the herd. It is known that they killed themselves when they came under slavery. Yes, in mythology, they believe that they are descendants of wolves, but there is no simple story as you explained.
Turks are the founder of the regular army,its way beforw established before the romans,The ranks which is using by modern armies today,created by Turks... And in this video showed tactic is wolf trap, used by all turkic empires and mongols
Bizim kadar ihanete uğrasaydınız çoktan yok olmuştunuz. Sömürge , Kültürleri yok etmek ve soykırım yapmadık. Tarihte okuduğunuz sizin için büyük olaylar Gökbörülerimizin merhametli davranışlarından ibaretti ...
Archers counter Calvary archers and spear men protect the archers from lancers thats how the romans and later late medieval and early modern armies dealt with steppe nomads
@@seyamrahman6722 horse archers are vulnerable to archers, skirmishers, crossbowmen and musketeers. if you have read my post I already said archer counter Calvary archers perhaps you should take your time reading my comment good.
Mate you have 0 knowledge that is clear. It’s not total war game so one army doesn’t consist only a single group of soldiers. Also these nomad horse archers were extremely skilled lancers and sword cavaliers as well. And considering they were basically light cavaliers in your logic it was the worst nightmare of the archers.
That was actually thing Called 'Castle'. Will you be kind enough to provide a instance where nomads in steppes or plain European lands lose against archers? For one, archery requires a lot of training, good luck hitting someone that is moving about 60-90 km/h, second nomad and European cavalry weren't same. Nomads prefer asymmetric battles over brainless head on charge against enemies.
In the heat of battle and with dreams of plunder, most regular armies lose control and the Turks know this, so after fighting for 1-2 hours they retreat and act like they are defeated, the scattered army becomes easy prey. That is why the biggest defeats of the Turks were against other Turks whose army consisted of cavalry.
this tactic is tradition for turk nomad tribes and it's knows as cross , we applied this tactic many wars against to europeans , it's always worked, romes in malazgirt , hungarians in mohac etc : D
@@Geoguy678it’s Pechenegs Turkics attacking Kiev. Vikings created Kievan Rus after annexing Kiev in 882. Pechenegs had continuous wars with Kievan Rus
@@Hey-hh7lk İnsanlar beğenmemiş demek oluyor. Ama mesela Atatürk filmi çıktığında çok büyük karşıt oy yiyecek Ermenilerden vs. o yüzden filmin iyi olup olmaması siyasi, film çıkışında yaşanan olaylar vs. 'den çok etkilenen İMDB'ye her zaman bağlanamaz.
Spoiler - >>>>>>> Dostum filmi izlersen göreceksin ki din özellikle Hristiyanlık öncesi paganizm çok fazla geçiyor. Daha fazlasını söylersem zaten izlemenin bir mantığı kalmıyor hikayeyi anlatmış olurum.@@Hey-hh7lk
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 ok but you are not an idiot to chase down a freaking running horse. Unless you try to portray them having mentally r*tarded dysfunction. Also there is still a leader there or someone to say something about it. But no.
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 also training in fighting was common even for peasant in our nordic countries here. It’s like americans having license in shooting and knows how to shot but don’t need to be soldier to do it. I also hate this idea modern people have of ”oh lower class are idiots and peasant are weak and slow in the head” The peasant/common person was probably the most hard working physical labour life and needed to know a lot of stuff to survive compared to luxuries city living. So no a peasant would be smart and i would fear to face a medieval peasang in combat with how strong they would be for working that kind of job 24/7.
Ah yes they always show us barbaric but they know our history better than us we were more civilized than them😂i mean turks mongols was ruthless brutal we offered the surender or die option mongols were on their villain arc😂
You would never chase horseman on foot, especially in armour after fighting; you would go back into your stockade and drink some water The show looks pretty cool though horse archers are deadly!
One few issues i have with this movie is that the turkic people are depicted as too barbaric Kinda like how in roman movies theh always depict Germanic tribe as crazy screaming barbarians with rags that run into a shieldwall when in reality they had a chain of command and even chainmail armor Or how the Alexandra the great movie dipicts persians as sussy femboys with eyeliners without realising that was just greek propaganda to make fun of Persians
Khergit Khaganate declared war on Kingdom of Nords.
actually they are slavic so that must be the khuzait vs sturgia
What the heck is Khuzait and Sturgia? I only know Khergits and Vaegirs@@An4kinskyw4lker
@@epheon1772 , Bro you are real Sigma dont worry. They didnt play warband or fire&sword
@@bahadrkoca384 I did and i still prefer nords
@@epheon1772 they are the og's
The feeling of regret when you learn that the Turks never retreated.
Turks most famous tactic is retreating haha
It's called a wolf trap; it simply surrounds the enemy by making a false retreat. Then the enemy is destroyed@@SmokeyMountain0
@@davutinat genius tactic,but i knew already
ya olum adam da demiş ki "türklerin aslında gerçekten geri çekilmediğini farkettiğinde gelen pişmanlık hissi" lafı niye götünden anlıyosun bizi millete rezil ediyosun@@davutinat
It's not "retreating" it is a tactic of false retreate to lure the enemy into a wolf trap@@SmokeyMountain0
If you are chasing down the Turks retreating it means you are running directly to the hell.
🤡
😅😅😅👏👏👏👏🤘🤘
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@miralayartt no
Not Poland🗿
Who in their right mind would chase a nomadic force on foot? Even chasing them with cavalry was a big mistake, they literally committed a medieval suicide lol..
who? russians lmao
@@TheMcMiodziotoo much vodka like always
Ikr, it would have been much smarter to stay within the city walls
That's literally the battle of Kalka and how Mongols destroyed so many greater adversaries ....
@@ehudzechariahschmidt7036 I mean that wouldn't help, at least not against Mongols who had amazing siege machines.
Two excellent shots here:
- javelin throw at 0:32; pay attention how heavy it was.
- lance thrust at 0:45; excellent example of range advantage.
We rarely see movies with such amount of weapon-realism.
Exactly that movie was amazing
@@maxillwexo9594hold on, what is the name of the movie, looks amazing
which movie is this?
@@demiurgoplatonico7815
Weapon realism is okayish, but the plot was awful. It is a bad movie.
@@demiurgoplatonico7815Viking 2016
they depicted vikings as civilised while nomads as some sort of cave man in this movie but Khazars were already established cosmopolit empire when Rus started their raids
what is the movie name please
@@ISrWolfI vikings
kharzas capital was a tent city.
@@TronUse999Bruh, houses were not something new, especially with all the influence from the persia and the byzantine. Tent cities were mostly present in conquest campaigns.
the turks were gay
I'm Başkort say hello to all turks! 🐺𐰌𐰈𐰼𐰄🐺
Салам, якташ!
😍
Hello Brother Wolf
as kardeş
Салам брал есенликлер
Turkic people fought almost everyone ☠️
BİZİM SAVAŞMADIMIZ IRK MİLLET KAVİM YOK BİZİMLE SAVAŞAN KAYBETMEYE MAHKUMDUR LORD BİZ ÇILGIN TÜRKLERİ İ TANIYACAKSINIZI BİZKİ BİZANSI YERLE BİR EDİP KOSTANTİNİYEYİ ALDIK AŞILMAZ DENEN SURLARI AŞDIK GEÇİLMEZ YIKILMAZ DENEN ÇİN SETTİNİ YIKTIK GEÇTİK ÇİNE BOYUN EYDİRDİK AVRUPANIN KALBİNİ DELDİK VE AVRUPANIN YARISINI KENDİ TOPRAKLARIMIZA KATTIK VE DİYER AVRUPA DEVLETLERİNİ PAPALIKLARI VERGİYE BALADIK HUN İMPARATORLUNDA AVRUPAYA ROMAYA DİZ ÇÖKTÜRDÜK PAPALARA DİZ ÇÖKTÜRDÜK MİLLETLERİ BOYUNDURUMUZ ALTINA ALDIK KIRALLARA TAÇ TAKTIK BİZİM TARİHİMİZ ZAFERLERLE DOLU KARAMANLARLA DOLUDUR LORD BİZKİ CENGİZ HANA EMİR TİMURA KAFA TUTMUŞ BİR TÜRKLERİZ BİZKİ AMERİKAYI VERGİYE BALMIŞ TÜRKLERİZ BİZKİ 100 YIL ÖNCE YUANI İNGİLİZLERİ ERMENİLERİ İNGİLTEREYİ TOPRAKLARIMIZDAKİ 7 DÜVELİ DENİZE DÖKDÜK EN GÜÇ SÜZ ZAYIF DÖNEMİMİZDE BİLE 7 DÜVELİ GERİ PÜSGÜRTÜK HEZİMETE URATTIK İŞDE BİZ ÇILGIN TÜRKLERİZ BİZİ ASÇOK BİLİRSİNİZ SAYIN LORD GENGHİS KHAN
Hunnu ⚔️ Han(China)
North.Hunnu ⚔️ South.Hunnu
Huns ⚔️ Goths
Huns ⚔️ Barbarians
Huns ⚔️ Romans
Gokturks ⚔️ Tan(China)
West.Gokturks ⚔️ East.Gokturks
East.Gokturks ⚔️ Tan(China)
East.Gokturks ⚔️ Uygurs
Uygurs ⚔️ Tan(China)
Uygurs ⚔️ Kyrgyz
Kyrgyzs ⚔️ Tan(China)
Massagets ⚔️ Persians
Tatars ⚔️ Borjigins(Mongols)
Kereits ⚔️ Borjigins(Mongols)
Naimans ⚔️ Borjigins(Mongols)
Naimans ⚔️ Oyrats(Mongols)
Merkits ⚔️ Borjigins(Mongols)
Great.Mongols ⚔️ Cin(China)
Great.Mongols ⚔️ Goryeo(Korea)
Great.Mongols ⚔️ Japan
Great.Mongols ⚔️ Horezmians
Mongols ⚔️ Caucas
Mongols ⚔️ Rus
Mongols ⚔️ Cumans
Mongols ⚔️ Hungary
Mongols ⚔️ Polands
Mongols ⚔️ Indians
Yuan(Mongols) ⚔️ Vietnameses
Ulus Juchi ⚔️ Lithuanians
Golden Horde ⚔️ Timurids
Timurids ⚔️ Otromans
Crimean Khanate ⚔️ Kazan Khanate
Kazan Khanate ⚔️ Siberian Khanate
Crimean Khanate ⚔️ Rus
Kazan Khanate ⚔️ Rus
Siberian Khanate ⚔️ Rus
Crimean Khanate ⚔️ Ottoman
Nogai Khanate ⚔️ Jangars
Kazakh Khanate ⚔️ Jangars
Mamai Khanate ⚔️ Rus
Ottomans ⚔️ Safavids
Ottomans ⚔️ Greece
Ottomans ⚔️ Bulgaria
Ottomans ⚔️ other Slavic nations
Ottomans ⚔️ Americans
Ottoman ⚔️ Italy
Ottomans ⚔️ Russians
Ottomans ⚔️ Britains
USSR(part) ⚔️ Reich
USSR(part) ⚔️ Japan
+
Russia(part) ⚔️ Ukraine
even with their brothers even with themselves
Uzaylılar kaldı 😅😅😅
@@Ahmet-vl2ph Yeah pretty much. But I don't understand the later part "with themselves". Do you mean among themselves. Then it is the Ottomans. They had, only the best, forged by fire, survival of the fittest schtick. Do you mean against each other? Well that applies for EVERYONE.
Thats an accurate Mount&Blade gameplay depiction 👍
😂😂😂😂
True 😂
This why khuzait always won against sturgia.😂😂
wolf trap we call it and used by ottomans too actually.... ı serve my army 3 years ago at syrian borden and we still got nearly same tactics....
btw we call hunters ambush in modern day ^^
That is not “wolf trap” there ia no trap in the video. This is basic encirclement. For “wolf trap” you have to fake retreat and lure enemy into your trap.
Thank you for fighting for the honor of the Turks
@@mberik lol u corny cringe
O dönem eski Türk uygarlığının zirvesi Uygur Kağanlığındaydı. Müzik, edebiyat, resim ve aristokrat yaşamın Türkçe kolundaki en yüksek örneklerini verdiler. Batıdaki Oğuz ve Peçenek grupları ise daha kabileci anlayışla yaşayan, görece daha cahil kalmış gruplardı. Zaten bu yüzden Peçenekler yok oldu, Oğuzlar da Rum ve Fars nüfusu içinde eridiler. Bir halkın aristokrat sınıfı yaratabilmesi o halkın kültürünün ve ulusal çıkarlarının çağlar boyu var olabilmesi için önemlidir. Yoksa tarih dalgalarının arasında yok olup gider. Bugünkü Türkiye'de de aristokrat sınıfı olmadığı için ülke yol geçen hanı oldu. Herkes kafasına göre takılıyor. Ulusal bir politika yok. Araplaşma ve bilinçsiz batılılaşma aynı anda fırtına gibi yeni nesilleri biçiyor.
Mükemmel anlatım🤌
Ülkeye senin gibi adamlar lazım.sakıncası yoksa mesleğini öğrenebilir miyim?
Filmin ismini biliyor musunuz acaba?
Oguzlar eridimi :))
Senin beynine ben
@kadirkadir-ot5mmoduncu gene iyi odun keser bu sallamaci bosa salliyor
These war tactics of the steppe geography have become the nightmare of the enemies. This culture of commanding larger armies is based on speed, ambush and damage infliction tactics on the battlefield. Geography is destiny.
Was this comment AI generated?
@@mairuzo No, I am a historian, if there are things you want to learn, I can give you information.
historian my as*@@keremcite9726
@@keremcite9726geography shapes your culture and economy
song name?
Turks never regret
you mean never "retreat"?
God bless Türkiye. God bless Albania. Love Türkiye from Albania 🇦🇱 🇹🇷
🐺🇹🇷♥️
❤🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🐺
not us todays karakalpaks must be the sons and doughters of peçeneks
I don't want to offend you, but Turks from Turkey have nothing to do with Turks from the great steppe.
😍
lan biz türküs at üstunde pingpong bile oynarız
ben çocukken kangala biniyodum :D
@@MasterOfWarLordOfPeace benim dedem file biniyordu💀🔥
ALGA TURAN ALGA ALTAY Azerbaycandan sevgiler
🤡
@@NYM27 you coward dogggy.
alga ne demek kardeş
@@tugayelik2137 ileri demek
@@NYM27 ew pathetic eu insect
Nordic people and Turkic people were not strangers to each other. They knew each other very well. Well enough to stay away…
Nope, Norsemen knew ZERO about Turkic hordes. They were seperated by some 2 Europe big land mass. Only when Vikings went as far east as Ukraine and Turkic hordes migrated as far west as Ukraine then they met. Same applies for Turkic hordes and Muslim Arabs.
@@otgunz They had an ongoing trade and diplomatic relations at least as early as first Gokturk Khanate if not older. Turks also had the same with Eastern Romans and many of them immigrated to Eastern Roman lands long before Islam came to them. Arabs knew of them due to Silk Road but didn’t have any official relations. Norse religion is almost identical to Turkic religion of that time. They even use the same Runes in writing. Those fairy tales talking about Turks coming out of nowhere to raid the world is just a myth to scare commoners in medieval Europe. Also a good excuse for defeats…
@@otgunz They knew who they were for sure but i would agree they had limited connection. Entire ancient world from Spain to China knew horselords, for example there are ancient Chinese, Hebrew, Greek and Roman records about Turkic people but ofc they are often ignored in the west even by historians not just some media productions sadly. Turks were an enemy of the west and westerners always like showing them as barbarians even if they actually had large complex empires..
From what i understand, these are suppose to be kievan rus.
These are not norse/nordic people, they might be considered vikings, because is not a culture thing, it’s just like calling someone a pirate, anyone can be pirate.
But what we associate as vikings, Kievan rus is not it.
@@TheRealRealMClovin If they are Kievan Rus, there is no chance they would be surprised by a Turk attack. It happens almost once a week over there back then…
Only Mongols could beat Turkic tribes.
Because they are cousins of turks
Mongol's army was full of Turkic soldiers
there was never mongol army. They were Turkic Tatars (or Tartars as they were known for Europe), unrelated to Khalkhas pig herders, who relocated to Mongolia, previously populated by Turkic tribes (Qıyat, Börü Tegin, Nayman, Kereit united by Tatar name), from Syberian forests in the late 16th century. Khalkhas (C gaplogroup) have no relation to Cengiz Han (R1b gaplogroup) and didn't know neither about him, nor about horses until 20th century. The only "mongolian" tribe that was nomadic are Oirats, though they were tought horse riding by Turkic tribes in 16 century.
We are the strongest warriors in history. I am proud to be Turkish.
"we"?
we are turks
No you are not
kuzait vs strurgia
bak bu iyiydi
Khuzaits are indeed Turkic af only some Troops are kinda Mongols
Eski bir türk savaş taktiği, turan taktiği ve ya kurt kapanı.
Being a Türk is hard because you fight with the world. Not being a Türk is harder because you fight with the Türks.
Turks and Mongols were always better warriors. always.
You're right
TURKS good at war 🇹🇷🇦🇿🤘💪💪
Acaba o yüzden mi 8 savaşta Ruslara yenildiler
@@pavel3659 kürd müsün
This is so dumb cuz there are large cosmopolit empires like Khazar and Cuman-Kipchak Khaganates
So depicting Turkic tribes as like Indians is kinda inaccurate
Cuman , kipchaks and kazakhs are turk to
@@clgnturk7810 değil her boka türk demeyi kesin tatarlar onlar tatarlar-türkler-moğollar ayrı bir ırktır
@@Melmordmoğol hariç Kıpçak, Tatar,Oğuz hepsi türk.
@@clgnturk7810 Cahil olma hepsi Turkic bir kavim.
Hazarlar oğuzdur
to be fair though, europeans quickly ended up learning how to deal with the horsement of the steppes and during their second invasion into Hungary they were crushed so severely that they never even considdered trying it again, bela IVth had been criticised heavily for his inabillity to effectively counter them during the first invasion so he set to work fixing that but would not experience the second one himself
he mostly just had castles built, reinforced and ordnances enforced for what to do in case of an enemy army, farmers would harvest all they could and would bring it all to the castle where the entire local population would take shelter. nomadic hordes were such fast and effective campaigners because they didn't need a large supply train, they would mostly live of the land , they couldn't that time around and ended up trying to besiege some castles, maybe taking one or two but at an unacceptable cost.
meanwhile the king of hungary mustered his proffesionalised army and marched to crush the two mongol armies destroying one entirely and the other broke apart and fled. soon after the mongols would lose more and more influence in that region whilst also losing their edge in the middle east as the mamluks chose to fight fire with fire and use the horseback archers and lancers against them (the latter was also done by europeans, and effectively so in the end but horseback archery never really cought on in most of europe, instead heavily armored crossbowmen, bowmen and infantry tended to take the main stage allongside knights which were the most heavily armored warriors of their age, (so basically they just outranged the mongols with foot archers and crossbowmen and if they got to close they would face heavily armored infantry and be charged by the tanks of their age (the mongols were no doubt more skilled as general horsemen but they rode light hardy ponies, european knights were so heavy they rode massive warhorses that by themselves were worth more than most people would have earned in their lifetime perhaps even several, they were not even ridden on the journey, knights would ride a common sadle horse and would mount their warhorses only for battle or perhaps also for tourneys
Yes quickly....that is after numerous invasions over the course of nearly 2 centuries losing many battles with fair ease. I wouldn't say quickly I would simply say they adapted in fair time and even as they did they still faced many defeats at their hands, a large aspect for such victory however in the latter periods would be technology at later periods and the fact many Steppe Nomads weren't as organised nor developed as they were during the Mongol periods where they were more centralised.
@@tauempire1793lol europeans “learned” how to deal with steppe riders , not counting turkomans raiding and absolutely dominating the battlefield up until late 1300’s in Balkans. Even in the battle of mohacs steppe cavalry was able to use the ancient techniques to trick hungarian army into the carnage.
@@tauempire1793 I suggest you learn history better. There were only a handful of battles that the steppe horsemen won "with fair ease". And it didn't last 2 centuries for the mighty Europeans to learn how to adapt. It took them at most or less than a century.
Compleo.
Uropians ??😂😂 hungars are turk we are same peaple under leader ship if Atilla the hun but no urope never learnt its just that turkic peaple fought in between each other more than enemy so that they kept destroying one another.
@@mongoliankhan6351konuşma. Sen sahtekarmısın? Moğol bizim küçük kuzenimiz. Çengiz Han Türkdür. Atila Han Türkdür. Metehanlar Teomanlar. Bize karşı gelme bizle takıl. Büyük Cengiz hanın ordusu 90% has Türkdür
The Decimal System was established for the first time in the Turkish Asian Hun Empire by Emperor Mete Han in 209 BC, according to the 10-member organizational system.
It is accepted as the founding date of the Turkish Armies and Turkish Land Forces.
Turkish are barely 500 years old man😅
@@bogdanvoznyi1103that mean you’re history ignorant
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 500, don't make me laugh, 16 Turkish Empires were established, take a look at the years of establishment of these states: )
These empires are respectively the Great Hun, the Western Hun, the European Hun, the White Hun, the Göktürk, the Avar, the Hazar, the Uyghur, the Karahan, the Ghaznavids, the Great Seljuk, the Khwarezmshahs, the Golden Horde, Timur, Babur and the Ottoman.
@@Serkanizm_TR You can't tell apart Turkic and Turkish?😹 Living on the Far East they even look different; also Hazar kaganate of it's first stage had Russian majority which makes it one of Russian states; and apparently Hunnu people are considered as turkic only by turk people but they related with Uralic and slavic as well; btw Uyghur language was created on basis of Chagatai language which is not turkic
As you see, if we just take a closer look most of your writing doesn't even related to turkic type😅
Turkmens and Mongols were raised as hunters since their child hood. They were naturally knights and archers and mastered ambushes although they were very brave. They weren't brave fools like Viking berserkers and used their battle rage only when they ran out of tricks
Seriously? A bunch of guys on foot trying to chase a bunch of guys on horseback; yeah there's no way that was going to end well.
Too many mushrooms were eaten for the glory of Odin
trust me I read a lot of times where the Turks used this tactic and it worked in the balkans and anatolia. My favorite was in 1071 battle of Malazkirt when the Turks first set foot in Anatolia.
Well when you have a culture that priorities dying in glory then winning well your troops are gonna make stupid decisions in the name of glory
That's why we still have Turks in modern day but no one calls northern people Norse anymore
@@angryvaultguybecause norse age ended.... This guy clearly Hard R
As we say in Turkiye, "they kiss you" (öperler), in a satirical way. :) Tengri biz menen, or, The Skygod is with us! :) And it is so sad today grandsons of Vikings are Christian, grandsons of Turkic Oghuz hordes are Muslim...
🤡
@@NYM27 nope
*C O P E*
Their descendants build the most well known empire through human history.
They can build that empire is simply by putting religious ideology together and melted into their way of life and politics. Unlike u pathetic atheist who blames anything to the religion because it doesn't suit ur pathetic ideology.
When it comes ro the war, neither vikings nor Sapartan. Therw os only one and true god of war The Mighty Turks...
Even the majority of Genghis Mongol army was Turkish😏🤣
tes of course far better than spanish tercios no way
@@Turanid.209Turkic
Respect Turkics from England. Vikings were a thorn in everyone's foot.
🐺♥️
Vikings is the biggest lie in history The Vikings were only dangerous for the Europeans, but they broke and fled against the Persians, Turks, Mongols, and Arabs.
Moral of story
Never chase retreating nomads
The only thing I don't understand, how the hell did the Romans, Europeans, Arabs and Vikings fall for the the really same trap for centuries???!!!
they don't have gamefaqs back then
Their withdrawal must be very realistic🤔
No war with Turks..
bad. If you are going to describe the Turkish warrior. They will have long braided hair. They He will have a Börk on his head and a fur or leather armor on his back. He will use a medium sized curved sword or mostly a war mace. When you say Turks, you are talking about a tribe that introduced tens, hundreds and thousands of troops into the army system before the Romans, and who gave order to China, Asia and Eurasia for centuries. If you're going to do a job, do it properly.
It is not turkish warrior lol
As a Turk I am grateful
As a turk u must to remember how many wars u lose
@@Redbeastik8 from 12 Russian-Turkic wars
Did you start from golden horde?@@arsenicos576
🤣@@Redbeastik
@@Redbeastik Ottoman empire was just one of the empires established by turkic tribes. Golden Horde was also on of them and Turan (by Amir Temur) also.
That battle taxtic still usen even roday by the Turkish army and Azerbayjan armu used it recently against to Armenians.
it called as "Crescent Tactic" or "Trap of the Wolves".
Ottoman Tueks named it is crescent and ancient Turks named it as Trao of the Wolves.
Wolves to same exact thing when they are hunting or fighring against ro something.
Tiday thw Tuekish army does the same thing with tanks, attack helicopters, special forces, artilary etc. in the ground and even with the fighting jets on the sky or nattle ahips etc. naval force in the sea.
turan tactic
they once pulled it off against the crusaders in the first crusade but the crusaders just kinda flanked the turks cavalry so that didnt go as espected
Turks>>>rus
History had proven vice versa
@@bogdanvoznyi1103Yeah, if you believe russian fairy tales.
@@bogdanvoznyi1103IT took the entirety of Europe to stop Turkish invasion. Not the other way around.
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 Turks lost almost all wars against the Russians, largely because Russians only attacked Turks when Turks were already being attacked by European powers on at least two other fronts. Here is another interesting fact: Russia sent military aid to Turks during the Liberation War that was fought right after WWI ended. It had a significant impact as Mustafa Kemal Pasha's soldiers were largely ill-equipped.
@@GreverManner4512 Russia was beating Turkish armies being in minority most of times, so it's about quality
Türkler savaşın tanrısıdır METE HAN, CENGİZ HAN,BİLGE KAĞAN,ATTİLA, KÜRŞAT,İSTEMİ YABGU,EMİR TİMUR, SELÇUK BEY,FATİH SULTAN MEHMET, YAVUZ SULTAN SELİM VEEE YÜCE LİDER MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK 🇭🇺🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇲🇳
Welcome to Turkish “Turan” tactic 😂
But Turkish are barely 500 years old, what's the correlation with Turan?
@@bogdanvoznyi1103 Turkish history is more than 3000 years, only the Ottomans lasted 623 years and the Seljuks before them lasted 300 years, also the first state with the word Turk in its name was the Gokturk State, it was also founded in the 500s.
Turkish? They are persians. They has no releations with turks.
This technique belongs to the iranian, which is called Partizani, Turan is also a land of Iranian race and Iranian language Iranian culture, not Turkish.
@@TulparozkanThree thousand years ago, even the Mongols did not exist😂😂😂😂Three thousand years ago, Aryan tribes had migrated to the Iranian plateau, and Persians and Medes had just emerged.
The Comanches on the Texas plains fought in the same way, and it was only after 1842, when the new and revolutionary Colt's Pattern 1836 Belt Revolving Pistol became available and the Texas Rangers and other US militia units were able to fight their way out of encirclement using sheer volume of fire.
Vikings(Varegians on that case) build(conquered) their citys on the ruins of Turkic lands,. Kiev was Scythians(Iranic) and later passed to Gokturks, Hunic(Avars) Bulgarians(of Volga) to Vikings
Iranians are not nomads, this is a ridiculous fabrication.
Scythians are of Turkic origin. Herodotus mentions Scythians in his narratives and describes the culture of the same nomadic Turks.
Look at the tamga of the Bulgarian khan! It's the same as the mark of the Kayi tribe in Turkey! All nomads are Turks, Mongols are cousins with Turks
Take a look at the tomb of Kubrat, Khan of Bulgaria, and then look at the tamga of the Kayi tribe! You will see that it is the same! Bulgarians assimilated
The continuation of the Sakas is the Hun Empire. After the Huns comes the Turkish Khaganate.And every tribe that migrated to Europe comes from the Huns.
@@grkngrkn3177 Sulimirski 1985, pp. 149-153: "During the first half of the first millennium B.C., c. 3,000 to 2,500 years ago, the southern part of Eastern Europe was occupied mainly by peoples of Iranian stock .... The main Iranian-speaking peoples of the region at that period were the Scyths and the Sarmatians ...."
Melyukova 1990, pp. 97-98: "From the end of the 7th century B.C. to the 4th century B.C. the Central- Eurasian steppes were inhabited by two large groups of kin Iranian-speaking tribes - the Scythians and Sarmatians ...."
Melyukova 1990, p. 117: "All contemporary historians, archeologists and linguists are agreed that ... the Scythian and Sarmatian tribes were of the Iranian linguistic group ...."
Davis-Kimball, Bashilov & Yablonsky 1995, p. 91: "Near the end of the 19th century V.F. Miller (1886, 1887) theorized that the Scythians and their kindred, the Sauromatians, were Iranian-speaking peoples. This has been a popular point of view and continues to be accepted in linguistics and historical science ...."
Jacobson 1995, pp. 31-32: "Whatever their ultimate origins, by the time the Pontic Scythians settled in the region of the Black Sea, they almost certainly spoke an Iranian language ...."
Batty 2007, p. 205: "The original Scythians, as far as we can tell, were Iranian-speaking nomadic pastoralists."
Ivantchik 2018: "Scythians, a nomadic people of Iranian origin ...."
Dandamayev 1994, p. 37: "In modern scholarship the name 'Sakas' is reserved for the ancient tribes of northern and eastern Central Asia and Eastern Turkestan to distinguish them from the related Massagetae of the Aral region and the Scythians of the Pontic steppes. These tribes spoke Iranian languages, and their chief occupation was nomadic pastoralism."
Harmatta 1996, p. 181: "[B]oth Cimmerians and Scythians were Iranian peoples."
Sulimirski 1985, pp. 149-153: "During the first half of the first millennium B.C., c. 3,000 to 2,500 years ago, the southern part of Eastern Europe was occupied mainly by peoples of Iranian stock ;.... [T]he population of ancient Scythia was far from being homogeneous, nor were the Scyths themselves a homogeneous people. The country called after them was ruled by their principal tribe, the 'Royal Scyths' (Her. iv. 20), who were of Iranian stock and called themselves 'Skolotoi' ...."
West 2002, pp. 437-440: "[T]rue Scyths seems to be those whom [Herodotus] calls Royal Scyths, that is, the group who claimed hegemony ... apparently warrior-pastoralists. It is generally agreed, from what we know of their names, that these were people of Iranian stock ...."
Rolle 1989, p. 56: "The physical characteristics of the Scythians correspond to their cultural affiliation: their origins place them within the group of Iranian peoples."
Rostovtzeff 1922, p. 13: "The Scythian kingdom ... was succeeded in the Russian steppes by an ascendancy of various Sarmatian tribes - Iranians, like the Scythians themselves."
Minns 1913, p. 36: "The general view is that both agricultural and nomad Scythians were Iranian."
As a Turk, I was afraid, now I understand them better.
One of the most warlike tribes among the Turks is the Pechenegs.
Khuzait Horsemen vs Sea Raiders
That’s a nice head you have on your shoulders.
Щас бы пешком ринутся в степную кавалерию😅
ну год назад кто то тоже Киев пытался взять)
@@romanromeo8527Ну да, ну да, так брали что даже не обстреливали и омон тащили за собой. Надеялись на переворот, но вы выбрали самый болезненный путь. Итог для вас будет грустным, но, черт подери, заслуженным.
@@Thuthispainfulони выбрали путь достойный восхищения. Противиться агрессору который больше и богаче очень не просто. Украинский народ волей доказал что все разведки мира были не правы. Что интересно, большинство украинской элиты не сбежало. Даже Порошенко с автоматом в руках патрулировал баррикады, а его ведь Зеленский намеревался посадить. Весь народ поднялся на защиту отечества, а Москва потеряла уже даже тех кто не был за Европу.
Неизвестно кто победит, но мы все знаем противостояние Греков / Персов. Любой мужчина поддержит такую отвагу, ведь противится сильному это очень тяжело. Я надеюсь Украина выстоит и мы все сможем восхищаться их отвагой.
@@BrodyMarody Арестович тут давеча рассказывал что у них в подразделениях до 70% отказников, людей как мышей на улицах ловят что бы на фронт отправить, женщины скоро в штурмы пойдут, действительно путь достойный восхищения
@@user-cy4nb1wk3i Арестович для Украины никто.
Viking❤Türk
Is it just me or is this weird, 3,1 million likes and only 60k views?? That's just crazy
that's youtube lag
Lmao i bugged youtube 😎
TÜRKS 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲
Turks and vikings have encountered many times in history: Huns (Attila), Avars, Pechenegs, Cuman Kipchaks, and the last one is the Battle of Manzikert... In the Battle of Manzikert, the elite units of the Byzantine army were the Viking Berserkers, and in this war, the Byzantine army numbered two hundred thousand people, and the Seljuk army numbered fifty thousand people. In the Battle of Manzikert, the Seljuks literally passed through the Byzantine army. Vikings never had a chance against the Turks at any time in history. I'm not saying it, history is saying it...
The Turan or Wolf Tactic 💀☠️🐺
Never fight a land war in Asia
Since when has the neighborhood of Kiev become Asia?
you are missing the message of that saying@@arsenicos576
Dont mess with the turkics
🐺🐺
Wolf trap is the name of the tactic. This is how wolf packs are hunted in the steppes 😂
@BenMarshall-g8i Not only for this reason. Steppe wolves cannot be taken into captivity. They travel in packs. They had a hierarchy and social order within the herd. It is known that they killed themselves when they came under slavery. Yes, in mythology, they believe that they are descendants of wolves, but there is no simple story as you explained.
awesome video
This shows how strategy outclass brute strength.
I love when uploader post the name of movie he took 60 seconds from.
Turks are the founder of the regular army,its way beforw established before the romans,The ranks which is using by modern armies today,created by Turks...
And in this video showed tactic is wolf trap, used by all turkic empires and mongols
turks in the early middle and late middle ages strong chads but modern history well we all know how that went
History continues to flow, my friend....we'll see. 😉 Every nation has a talent, but God created the Turks for war.
Bizim kadar ihanete uğrasaydınız çoktan yok olmuştunuz. Sömürge , Kültürleri yok etmek ve soykırım yapmadık. Tarihte okuduğunuz sizin için büyük olaylar Gökbörülerimizin merhametli davranışlarından ibaretti ...
Asian power!❤
Türkler savaş alanından kaçıyorsa asla onları takip etmeyin. (Sun Tzu Çinli Savaş Stratejisyeni)
Öyle bir sözü yok
sun tzu devrinde Türk adı bile yok
Aynen yok
Hatta onun yaşadığı devirde (savaşan beylikler dönemi mö 400-220) ortada daha Türk diye bir ad yok.
@@ilikan99 bu bir meme dostum
Archers counter Calvary archers and spear men protect the archers from lancers thats how the romans and later late medieval and early modern armies dealt with steppe nomads
and what of the horse archers?
@@seyamrahman6722 horse archers are vulnerable to archers, skirmishers, crossbowmen and musketeers. if you have read my post I already said archer counter Calvary archers perhaps you should take your time reading my comment good.
Mate you have 0 knowledge that is clear. It’s not total war game so one army doesn’t consist only a single group of soldiers. Also these nomad horse archers were extremely skilled lancers and sword cavaliers as well. And considering they were basically light cavaliers in your logic it was the worst nightmare of the archers.
@@mustafaturk9180 there's plenty of battles showcasing a European, east Asians or middle Eastern army defeated a steppe nomadic army
That was actually thing Called 'Castle'.
Will you be kind enough to provide a instance where nomads in steppes or plain European lands lose against archers?
For one, archery requires a lot of training, good luck hitting someone that is moving about 60-90 km/h, second nomad and European cavalry weren't same.
Nomads prefer asymmetric battles over brainless head on charge against enemies.
Chasing cavalry on foot in open ground... so clever
In the heat of battle and with dreams of plunder, most regular armies lose control and the Turks know this, so after fighting for 1-2 hours they retreat and act like they are defeated, the scattered army becomes easy prey. That is why the biggest defeats of the Turks were against other Turks whose army consisted of cavalry.
pechenegs vs vikings
What is the background music?
wolves outwit a herd of bison
this tactic is tradition for turk nomad tribes and it's knows as cross , we applied this tactic many wars against to europeans , it's always worked, romes in malazgirt , hungarians in mohac etc : D
OGHUZ TURKS 🏇🏹
Nords vs Khergits
nords vs turks :D
what is the name of the movie?
Viking (2016)
@@cyrender THANK YOU
Did the Vikings ever meet turks?
Yes, but the eastern vikings
@@ricardobarreto7624 which battle/war or campaign?
@@Geoguy678it’s Pechenegs Turkics attacking Kiev. Vikings created Kievan Rus after annexing Kiev in 882. Pechenegs had continuous wars with Kievan Rus
@@NoName-sz7fj okay, thank you!
What's the movie name? Please
Viking (2016)
İmdb'sine bakmayın, çok iyi film (Viking 2016).
İMBD'si düşük olması kötü demek olmuyormu?
@@Hey-hh7lk İnsanlar beğenmemiş demek oluyor. Ama mesela Atatürk filmi çıktığında çok büyük karşıt oy yiyecek Ermenilerden vs. o yüzden filmin iyi olup olmaması siyasi, film çıkışında yaşanan olaylar vs. 'den çok etkilenen İMDB'ye her zaman bağlanamaz.
@@azizabdullahbalci Tamamda vikingslerle kimin sorunu olabilirki?
Spoiler - >>>>>>>
Dostum filmi izlersen göreceksin ki din özellikle Hristiyanlık öncesi paganizm çok fazla geçiyor. Daha fazlasını söylersem zaten izlemenin bir mantığı kalmıyor hikayeyi anlatmış olurum.@@Hey-hh7lk
ingilizlerin belki 🤣@@Hey-hh7lk
What movie was this from?
Vikings are not idiots, they would never try to chase down cavalry on foot, they know horses and horses are faster than a human.
Most vikings weren't professional soilders. They were just ordinary men who volunteered for pillaging expeditions
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 ok but you are not an idiot to chase down a freaking running horse.
Unless you try to portray them having mentally r*tarded dysfunction.
Also there is still a leader there or someone to say something about it. But no.
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 also training in fighting was common even for peasant in our nordic countries here.
It’s like americans having license in shooting and knows how to shot but don’t need to be soldier to do it.
I also hate this idea modern people have of ”oh lower class are idiots and peasant are weak and slow in the head”
The peasant/common person was probably the most hard working physical labour life and needed to know a lot of stuff to survive compared to luxuries city living.
So no a peasant would be smart and i would fear to face a medieval peasang in combat with how strong they would be for working that kind of job 24/7.
Turks were winning most of their battles with these tactics mate not only Vikings, many smart civilization got this bait
@@maxillwexo9594 well guess those civilization are idiots too then.
Running towards the hungry wolf. Hahaha. 😂
Ah yes they always show us barbaric but they know our history better than us we were more civilized than them😂i mean turks mongols was ruthless brutal we offered the surender or die option mongols were on their villain arc😂
mongols were way much more barbaric. Also mongols are not turks.
turks and mongols they both altaic and people of steppe same culture@@Niko-vh8pj
@@Ryan-gw2gi anatolian turks like me had seperated from them both in culture and genetics widely.
is it a good thing or bad thing? so u mixed with arabs and arab culture?@@Niko-vh8pj
@@Niko-vh8pj nope
You would never chase horseman on foot, especially in armour after fighting; you would go back into your stockade and drink some water The show looks pretty cool though horse archers are deadly!
at ile kacanlara koşarak yetişmeye calısmak nedir :D
One few issues i have with this movie is that the turkic people are depicted as too barbaric
Kinda like how in roman movies theh always depict Germanic tribe as crazy screaming barbarians with rags that run into a shieldwall when in reality they had a chain of command and even chainmail armor
Or how the Alexandra the great movie dipicts persians as sussy femboys with eyeliners without realising that was just greek propaganda to make fun of Persians
true.
Turkiylar dunyo hukumdori boʻlgan yashasin Turkiylar
Yes you may dream.
@@jackstod was before
Turkic tribes was very lovely in the time :)
TURAN tactics )
What is this film?
Viking (2016)
Movie name
Viking 2016
Ah, yes, the so called "feinted retreat" - a common tactic of the steppe people.... 🤔
The soldiers of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth were not afraid of the Turks, but they respected them because they fought as equals.
🤣🤣🤣😂😂
@@fo3357 - ruclips.net/video/1JKKjWvS-jo/видео.htmlsi=rWvuBnRYK0ejAJNh
Which means, their grand father's literally was Türk.
Polish-lithuanian was shit for Turks you lose so many times to Golden-Horde
dont forget how Huns save slavic people from Germannic people
Not cry Ottoman vassal 😂😂😂😂
Infantry charging cavalry! That entire sequence was possibly the most stupid representation of medieval era warfare I have ever seen.
Crescent tactic
Wolf Trap
music name?
Devil eyes phonk
Thanks
Turkic 💪🏻🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿
Turks are always won no diff
You lost to a british man wearing an arab cloth hat. i dont know what else to say lmfao
löl british :):)::):) british russian armania greece italy france vsvsvs and vs ottoman empire and ATATÜRK@@LucasTheGreat.
@@LucasTheGreat. where are u from pleb
@@LucasTheGreat.And they came back with dreams of afternoon tea too, what else?
@@LucasTheGreat. Do you know diffarance with Turks (turkic people) and Turkish?
you were lose by Huns (also our ancestors)
Who won? Turkish or the Scandinavians?
Turks never took kiev, not even close, but places like Crimea are a different story
@@HorrorTacticocuamans and vlach allies plundered Kiev...
@@HorrorTacticoThey had to pay tribute for many years.
From which movie/series/documentary? Anyone knows?
its a film, Viking 2016
from a shitty movie. don't waste your time
Kyiv is 300 years older than crappy moscow. and moscow was Kyivs colony
🐺🤘😎TURKS
Patzinaks
@@arsenicos576 O DA NE LAN
2 ileri bir geri bunu mehteran takımında bile görmek mümkündür. 😉
WOLF TACTIC 🐺🤘😎🇹🇷