Reproductive Justice: Part 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024

Комментарии • 3

  • @jeronimocastro3282
    @jeronimocastro3282 Год назад +1

    Continuing with my notes from pt1:
    1. States can restrict abortion care if they count with the majorities. People within the minority can either construct a majority, or leave for another state… that’s democracy last time I checked.
    2. The case with fetal homicide laws is exactly the same.
    3. All convictions of miscarriages in the US until the day have involved the to-be mother with illicit drug use during their pregnancy. Irresponsible, and in these states, illegal. It is hence constitutional, legal, and to many, fair for them to be jailed.
    4. Mrs Marshae Jones was prosecuted because she had sparked an unnecessary fight that ended up in the baby being shot. Both the shooter and Mrs Jones were charged, arguing that the real victim of both of their reckless and criminal decisions was the baby. Again, it is hence constitucional, legal, and to many, fair for Ms Jones to be jailed.
    5. After checking all cases that appear in the headlines shown at 0:46, all involve reckless or criminal behavior by the pregnant woman as well as illicit drug use during pregnancy.
    6. There is no evidence at all to support such “reality” where a black, brown or low income American will be hit hardest by outlawing abortions.
    7. There is a huge cause and effect fallacy when it is stated that a woman can be “jailed for a pregnancy outcome”. The reality is, as mentioned, completely different factors lead to the jailing of these pregnant women.
    What a poor argumentative structure, as well as research capabilities. May I guess whoever created this is either incompetent, strongly ideological, or wishes to mislead…