I like to think Alec helped install EDI into the SR2. The model was meant for Shepard and left in the SR2 Captain's quarters, but Alec wanted something to remember his time with EDI.
I played Andromeda once. It was OK enough that I technically finished the game, but not in a way that I would be satisfied if decisions in Andromeda were going to affect a 4th Milky way game. So the question is, do I need to schedule another Andromeda run before I play ME5, or are Andromeda and ME5 only going to be linked at a very superficial level, e.g. did you play as son or daughter of Ryder and not much else?
If I had to guess right now, I'd say MEA is going to play a bigger part in the next game than most think. Or at the very least, to understand *all* parts of the next Mass Effect, that'd it be better to play it than not.
I have played Andromeda and it felt bland, boring, repetitive, uncanny valley and it didn't feel Mass Effect game. I think it was like some mmorpg game and forced Mass Effect theme built in. Though the combat was fun and I would say those loyalty missions had some interesting level design and I had the most fun with. Main story is nothing new for Mass Effect fan but I kinda liked the ending. Some poor game design choices in game like slooooow tedious unskippable animations when you get off planet and go to planet and you will watch those animations many times because of the quest structure. some of the menus and shops are annoyingly slow and bad design for simple task like leveling up your gear etc. In the end I just wanted the game to end so I turned difficulty to easy so I can just push fire button and run so I get to play better game
I like to think Alec helped install EDI into the SR2. The model was meant for Shepard and left in the SR2 Captain's quarters, but Alec wanted something to remember his time with EDI.
It seems like they wanted to set up tann as the new udina. Another part of MEA that i think woild have been retroactively improved by a sequel/DLC
Agreed on the Tann / Udina vibes. So much of this game felt like set-up for a sequel.
I played Andromeda once. It was OK enough that I technically finished the game, but not in a way that I would be satisfied if decisions in Andromeda were going to affect a 4th Milky way game. So the question is, do I need to schedule another Andromeda run before I play ME5, or are Andromeda and ME5 only going to be linked at a very superficial level, e.g. did you play as son or daughter of Ryder and not much else?
If I had to guess right now, I'd say MEA is going to play a bigger part in the next game than most think. Or at the very least, to understand *all* parts of the next Mass Effect, that'd it be better to play it than not.
Tann just lied so hard about Garson death and then we find out that she was actually murdered.
I don't remember if Tann knew or not, but that's a pretty glaring lie if he knew.
your Ghost Ryder is cute
Tyty! The MEA character creation is difficult to wrangle but I think Ghost's final look is cute too. :3
@@paragonseven i was lucky enough to make a cute red headed Ryder
too many glitches and crashes i wanna continue but the crashing is annoying
I have played Andromeda and it felt bland, boring, repetitive, uncanny valley and it didn't feel Mass Effect game. I think it was like some mmorpg game and forced Mass Effect theme built in. Though the combat was fun and I would say those loyalty missions had some interesting level design and I had the most fun with. Main story is nothing new for Mass Effect fan but I kinda liked the ending. Some poor game design choices in game like slooooow tedious unskippable animations when you get off planet and go to planet and you will watch those animations many times because of the quest structure. some of the menus and shops are annoyingly slow and bad design for simple task like leveling up your gear etc.
In the end I just wanted the game to end so I turned difficulty to easy so I can just push fire button and run so I get to play better game