What can I say. I started watching Kai 10 years ago on Digital Rev. :))) So far I am, and I will be a loyal subscriber. Great job. Keep doing high-quality reviews. It is always fun and exciting to watch. P.S. this is my first comment since 2010.
Thank you for your opinion. It's a breath of fresh air. Most RUclipsrs say this camera is revolutionary, and it's very annoying when it's obviously not.
@@jaymills1720’s junk. Sony makes awful apsc lenses, the only good lenses for Sony apsc are full frame lenses which you aren’t getting the most out of if you use their apsc cameras. With full frame lenses you lose the potential of smaller size of apsc too. Also he made comparisons to the competition so idk what you’re talking about, he talks about its lack of dual card slots compared to similarly priced Fuji apsc cams, lower quality EVF, the image quality is a known quantity with the lens and processor. XT5 is the main comparison to this, for not much more money you get 40mp over 26, two card slots, better build quality, better 4K video with next to no rolling shutter, and actually good lenses for apsc unlike Sony.
Agree, its not a forward step, its just up to date, maybe Sony has followed its trend of updates through software, id be spewing if this is the best crop they can produce, by the way I’m a Nikon man (not anti Sony in any way) and in the same boat, no news on a d500 replacement. No wonder everyone is flowing to Fuji. I usually run a dx and fx body combo with 3 fx primes 300, 40 and 24, the dx opens all of these up. I was ready to shift camps, but for sport shooting this doesn’t touch the opposition (current Canon and Fuji) No real drama yet for me, just waiting who produces a pro crop first (Nikon or Sony) to move off of f-mount (3 new lenses and either a z8 or a7 are the easy bit)
Sony's tech trickle down approach makes sense, it's just really uninspiring. Really the Toyota Camry of cameras. Utilitarian, will get better after a couple years, but if you have a Camry already, why upgrade even after 4 years?
A lot of people will be looking at how much this reduces the price of the earlier models, the A6400 for around £800 and the A6500 around £900 and the A6600 around £1,000 with the kit lens will get a lot of people into this system. Legacy models have been due a price reduction for some time.
it's hard to tell the difference between the X-H2S(?) and A6700 in that soccer bit when using a wide angle at a small aperture, everything looks like it's in-focus so tracking seemed like an unimportant feature in that scenario.
I feel that this is not directly comparable to the X-T5. The most direct competitor is the X-S20 which aside from the less performing autofocus (most likely, but by how much, unknown) and lack of weather sealing, offers a highly compelling package for 100 dollars less.
Yeah, it's crazy RUclips reviews compare it to higher end apsc cameras. For its price its a decent camera. But it feels like a joke when compared to an xh2/2s. I honestly feel a6000 series cameras are made to be second cameras for people using sony full frame, since they have the same mount and I believe the a6700 uses the same battery as a7iv (not sure)
Some people say that Sony didn't hold back on this one. If 55 frame raw burst rate with 11 fps on a 10 year old resolution isn't holding back, I don't know what is. Plus, no RAW video HDMI output like the X-S20 that this competes with.
Too funny! Shagging a fence, wearing a Pentax hat, filming on Insta360 X3 on selfie stick, reviewing Sony a6700! I wonder what Sony think about this review!
Best review I’ve seen. All the other RUclipsrs are just hyping this. No open gate, no increased resolution for stills. Shit viewfinder and screen. Was waiting for this to complement my FX3 but god it sucks. Wanted 40mp
Both a6700, R7, and XS20 are great cameras. Although im not really into these type of content creation focused cameras. I am more on the photography side. I guess the most interesting thing about these releases are there are more grumnblings against the a6700, when we can consider how it has better rolling shutter and video dynamic range than the r7. It also has the best video autofocus and lens breathing compensation, compared to the low performance of fujis when it comes to autofocus. And lastly the lens options; you cant beat sony when it comes to 3rd party lenses. I believe all of these 3 cameras are great and theres no need to grumble too much against the a6700 which is in my opinion the better choice if your mainly a content creator and not just focused on photography. Sony could have done better but the a6700 can go against the r7 and xs20.
"Sony's autofocus just works" As an A7iv owner, I'd say "detection and tracking work. Focusing sometimes does". You have to look at the stills to check the autofocus. The A6700 is better than the A7iv in this department, but it delivers only 85% of sharp pictures of moving subjects (Damien Bernal, Northrups).
I like having a a6000 series form factor and functionality with the tech of the newest A7s. Will certainly keep an eye out for one would make a good concert bring along
Which concerts do you go to that allow any kind of interchangeable lens camera? A lot of venues don't want attendees who aren't officially covering the event to bring those in.
@@xWood4000 there are plenty of compact FE lens options for the equivalent aperature. Remember that FF is one stop brighter than APSC, so a Sigma 16mm f1.4 (400grams) is equivalent to 24mm f2.1 in Full frame terms. Samyangs 24mm f1.8 is almost half the weight (230 grams) while also being 1/3 of a stop faster
It's a cheaper FX30 with better grip and viewfinder. It's good enough package for me. Not sure they'll ever make an A7000 really as they'd be encroaching A7 price by then.
What Sony could do though, is an A7000 being an APS-C A9 or A1, and in the A7 price territory. Specifically for croppers (i.e. for wildlife or sports pros / enthusiasts). Back in the DSLR era, Nikon did just that with their D500. It was APS-C, it was as expensive as a regular fullframe (D750), but had the same high end traits of their D5. That was a success formula (the D500 was a success AFAIK). So, why not repeating the same tactics now in the mirrorless world. Unless Sony judges, that the niche is too small, or that an A7000 would become too popular (therefore cannibalizing full frame sales too much)?
6:50 Fuji is in trouble. If you say that you’ll still pick Sony over Fuji for stills because they have more compact lenses, then Fuji needs to rethink what they’re doing.
Isn't this the problem with all the different models so close together though? How do you fit an updated model in the range without it encroaching on or even surpassing on the more exotic models capabilities for less money...
love this review! been watching kai and lok since the digitial rev days. it looks like to be a pretty nice camera. I really like what sony did to the mirrorless industry as a canon fanboy that didn;t switch to sony and waited it out until the so so r camera but the later r cameras are much nicer keep up the great work!
I agree with your review. But keep in mind this camera has not gone up in price despite all the camera price inflation in the last 4 years, so I would say it’s a good deal. Plus, I think the main improvements are with video instead of photography, with reduced rolling shutter and better processing
I understand your point of view. I would argue that it's the same price because there is not much innovation. Sonys is basically saying you need to buy a full frame camera to get a good hybrid camera. They're not even trying to compete with Fujifilm or Panasonic. They need at least one more aps-c that at the very least has 2 card slots, 6 or 8k open gate, high bitrate external recording with good codecs, and around 40 megapixels. Fujifilm has had cameras like this for a while now and Panasonic can do this type of thing with the micro four-thirds. In my opinion Cannon even has better apsc cameras. I would love to pay more money to get these features. The only thing Sony has right now is good autofocus.
@@johnrpittenger I guess it depends on what you are shooting, but to me the a6700 looks very good. I have an A7Siii, an A7C, and an a6500/6400. I don't need more than 4k 120 fps, and I don't need an extra card slot. (A7Siii is usually overkill for me, but I use it in studio.) I'd be happy with the A7C if it had 4k 60 fps. Sony's AI autofocus is industry leading. I have other cameras (Fuji X100V, Ricoh GRiii x, etc.) and the other brands are not quite there in AF. I will probably get the a6700 as a lightweight "do it all" hybrid to take on travel adventures. (Unless the A7Cii comes along soon to steal its thunder.)
Hey Kai I remembered all those gear reviews you did years ago, the one in particular that stood out was the a6000 it was revolutionary for mirrorless cameras at that time, I bought it after looking at your review and I still have it and it's still working really well. the a6700 likely has much better tech than the OG a6000 but they never updated the look and made it even bulkier nearing the size of an old DSLR. This camera for an apsc body is big and looks like an old camcorder from the 2000s tbh.
I think this camera might be a lot better than a lot of the review channels are making out. especially that chip. It's so tempting at such an affordable price. Nice channel as always. 1 card slot is a mistake even if the US channels are saying its not, you know the ones in bed with Sony.
Hi! One of the best and most honest reviews I’ve seen! You make good points. I’ve also been thinking about how easily Sony releases “new” cameras nowadays… Oh well… All best!
As someone coming from the a6600 I definitely feel like the upgrades are pretty solid. The AI chip, the screen going to the side, the 4k 120, and the SD card finally being on the side are really helpful in my opinion. If I was committed to my a6600 or if it was my main camera, I'd probably definitely upgrade, but since I have another main character, and the a6600 is already great, there isn't a major reason to upgrade. Maybe in the bigger picture if you look at all Sony cameras this might not be the best camera, but if you strictly use the a6000 series then this is a great upgrade.
@@joeb3619 that's a fair point. Although eventually it would drop below 2K and that would still make me happy. Until that day my A7II stays on active duty 😂
With the multi port being removed, I'm wondering how you're supposed to attach remote shutter releases or intervelometers. Also, the buffer is still smaller than the a6500's, but that camera was ridiculous. Glad to see the SD slot is FINALLY faster and we FINALLY get USB-C, though. Tempted to grab one of these as an upgrade from my a6500.
Would you recommend this camera to a stills shooter? I do full time headshots and portraits and I want something light and fast, currently shooting FUJI XT5 but thinking of jumping. What lenses would you recommend to rival a 50mm and 85mm equivalent? Especially the 85.
Well, this sensor on the a6700 is a lot more than just a couple of megapixels. It's a backlit sensor that combined with the AI processor, creates highly detailed and virtually noiseless images, even in low light situations. The jump from the a6600 is huge. Add to that the improved autofocus and this camera is more than competitive.
For the price point if you are already a sony user this is an excellent option. If you are a wildlife or event photographer this fills a large gap. The A74 has a crop option but the resulting image size in pixels is too low. The 6700 as a second camera to my a74 is a near perfect fit. The combination of the crop factor and the fairly high pixel count is perfect for bird photography with big telephotos.
I have an A9 and an A&RIV but want to get more into bird video and want to upgrade but this mix from the Sony parts bin ain't it. Rangefinder design, low quality evf, crappy screen and unimproved stabilisation but with great focussing and good video. I'm still waiting for the D500 style semi-pro style body. I'm not confident Sony will deliver and am looking over the fence at Nikon Z8 where I can at least use my lenses with the Megadep adapter.
I think here in the US we look at this sort of camera very differently. I see an A6700 as a solid third, fourth or fifth camera in a multicam setup because it has 10 bit and oversampling. Or as a solid second shooter camera if they don’t have a Sony. It’ll be easy to use because of the same batteries and easy to match in post thanks to 10 bit. Or as a gimbal camera with the 17-70 2.8, thanks to the flip out screen. Vlogging is out of style in America. It’s all talking head now. Vlogging can be visually overwhelming anyway with all the wobble and wide shots. Your honest opinion of a camera matters more to me than what you guys did when playing around with it.
I went with the XH2s. I’ve went away from Fujifilm a handful of times and each time I’ve gravitated back to it, even though it does have its quirks there’s just something about it that makes me wanna pick up the camera
Hey Kai; why didn't you mention the Sony a6700 Doesn’t Ship to Customers With Any Way to Charge It?? Seriously man. No charger. No cable. nothing. How do you charge it???
Very cool video. Nothing serious. I continue to like this format. Concerning the camera itself: deceiving. FPS /buffer /displays / 1* SD card (in 2023 really?) / top shutter speed remains at 1/4000th . Is this thing accepting at least a grip for vertical shooting ?
This is the best a6700 video. Besides the information and thoughts, the fun side of the video was fantastic. I did not just laugh a lot, I also laughed so loud because I wasn't able to contain myself. I completely lost it at "Oh hello".
I bought my X-S20 a day before the A6700 was released - while I love it, I am getting IBIS wobbling in handheld video with wide lenses (13mm Viltrox F1.4). Are you getting IBIS wobbles on the A6700 at all with ultra wide lenses?
You are comparing it with a Fuji that costs $1000 more - I would expect a lot more for the $1000, in your words "Still isn't up there with the Sony". Think of the lenses you can have for $1000. It's not just 2mp more, it's a stacked sensor, the image quality has noticeably improved. Looks like you had fun getting your exercise for the day though! :)
that would cost closer to $2k and then people would say the canon r7 is a better deal then. since its got more resolution and dual card slot at a similar price to this.
I have the 6400 now, and I am looking to upgrade. For wildlife and bird photography it’s not the best camera. Fuji has released I believe two or three updates with the last one just in May for AF. In regards to AF, Fuji may not be as good as Sony or Canon, but I suspect it’s a big improvement coming from a 6400 or even a 6600, as they don’t even have wildlife tracking.
@@fantrollgamerlvmaxBesides AF and rolling shutter the X-S20 is simply superior. A6700 is a not a good buy unless you're helplessly invested in E-mount.
Yeah very meh update. I originally switched to Sony from Nikon because it seemed like Sony was the innovator and Nikon was stuck in the past but now it seems like Nikon (and all the other brands) are doing amazing things and Sony is now the one stuck behind. The A7RV was pretty good but a lot like this camera when you break it down the only actual updates were new menus, better AF and the admittedly awesome tilty/flippy screen but it still had the same old ridiculously slow sensor from the A7RIV. The last few cameras have all been pretty disappointing and that combined with their stance on on not releasing firmware updates is making me start considering switching to another brand. Really the only thing holding me back right now are my 9 E mount lenses.
Great video. My work camera is a fuji xh2. Great camera for stills and video. Recently I had the opportunity to use an a7iv for a gig and I kept comparing it to my xh2.. and really, xh2 far exceeds the capability of the a7iv in every way except, autofocus tracking and the obvious low light improvement of full frame. I purchased an a6700 as a travel camera, and im considering selling off my xh2 for a7iv... reasons: I love having a full frame camera for numerous reasons and a smaller less expensive travel camera. With sony, I can have that and only buy fe lenses. While always having similar results. Fuji xh2 8k pro res is absolutely incredible... but editing 4k is faster, meaning sony would give me enough and speed up my work flow, something I noticed after using the a7iv for a project. I hate to say it, but sony does make things simpler IMO. And these days, getting projects shot, edited and out quick is becoming more and more important.
Gear shouldn’t be taken too seriously, and I’m happy to always be entertained & in the know rather than bored & informed. Thanks Kai and Lok :)
What can I say. I started watching Kai 10 years ago on Digital Rev. :))) So far I am, and I will be a loyal subscriber. Great job. Keep doing high-quality reviews. It is always fun and exciting to watch.
P.S. this is my first comment since 2010.
Me too 😀 since 2010
Thank you for your opinion. It's a breath of fresh air. Most RUclipsrs say this camera is revolutionary, and it's very annoying when it's obviously not.
@@jaymills1720’s junk. Sony makes awful apsc lenses, the only good lenses for Sony apsc are full frame lenses which you aren’t getting the most out of if you use their apsc cameras. With full frame lenses you lose the potential of smaller size of apsc too. Also he made comparisons to the competition so idk what you’re talking about, he talks about its lack of dual card slots compared to similarly priced Fuji apsc cams, lower quality EVF, the image quality is a known quantity with the lens and processor.
XT5 is the main comparison to this, for not much more money you get 40mp over 26, two card slots, better build quality, better 4K video with next to no rolling shutter, and actually good lenses for apsc unlike Sony.
I'm just glad Sony is still making cameras for NEX people. Wish they'd make an APC LX100 dammit!
@jaymills1720 If you think this review was lazy, check out his A5100 review. Probably the best bang per buck camera ever made. Also from Sony.
Agree, its not a forward step, its just up to date, maybe Sony has followed its trend of updates through software, id be spewing if this is the best crop they can produce, by the way I’m a Nikon man (not anti Sony in any way) and in the same boat, no news on a d500 replacement. No wonder everyone is flowing to Fuji. I usually run a dx and fx body combo with 3 fx primes 300, 40 and 24, the dx opens all of these up. I was ready to shift camps, but for sport shooting this doesn’t touch the opposition (current Canon and Fuji) No real drama yet for me, just waiting who produces a pro crop first (Nikon or Sony) to move off of f-mount (3 new lenses and either a z8 or a7 are the easy bit)
Pretty much all of the RUclipsrs like Jason Vong saying how great the a6700 is are getting paid from Sony to do so.
Sony's tech trickle down approach makes sense, it's just really uninspiring. Really the Toyota Camry of cameras. Utilitarian, will get better after a couple years, but if you have a Camry already, why upgrade even after 4 years?
A lot of people will be looking at how much this reduces the price of the earlier models, the A6400 for around £800 and the A6500 around £900 and the A6600 around £1,000 with the kit lens will get a lot of people into this system.
Legacy models have been due a price reduction for some time.
a plain sony a6000 is still very expensive. Over £350. Insane.
A series prices have been fixed since a6000 lol. Theres hardly been any change.
definitely a different perspective from every other RUclipsr -- good take, Kai
That’s because all the other guys are Sony shills. Guys like Arthur’s whole channel are based off Sony cameras obviously he gonna be slobbering
it's hard to tell the difference between the X-H2S(?) and A6700 in that soccer bit when using a wide angle at a small aperture, everything looks like it's in-focus so tracking seemed like an unimportant feature in that scenario.
I feel that this is not directly comparable to the X-T5. The most direct competitor is the X-S20 which aside from the less performing autofocus (most likely, but by how much, unknown) and lack of weather sealing, offers a highly compelling package for 100 dollars less.
And R7
So where the hell is Sony's flagship apsc?
Yeah, it's crazy RUclips reviews compare it to higher end apsc cameras. For its price its a decent camera. But it feels like a joke when compared to an xh2/2s. I honestly feel a6000 series cameras are made to be second cameras for people using sony full frame, since they have the same mount and I believe the a6700 uses the same battery as a7iv (not sure)
glad you brought up the 4 year void. this camera has what i wouldve expected in a 6400 replacement 3 years ago.
Some people say that Sony didn't hold back on this one. If 55 frame raw burst rate with 11 fps on a 10 year old resolution isn't holding back, I don't know what is. Plus, no RAW video HDMI output like the X-S20 that this competes with.
Too funny! Shagging a fence, wearing a Pentax hat, filming on Insta360 X3 on selfie stick, reviewing Sony a6700! I wonder what Sony think about this review!
Best review I’ve seen. All the other RUclipsrs are just hyping this. No open gate, no increased resolution for stills. Shit viewfinder and screen. Was waiting for this to complement my FX3 but god it sucks. Wanted 40mp
Both a6700, R7, and XS20 are great cameras. Although im not really into these type of content creation focused cameras. I am more on the photography side. I guess the most interesting thing about these releases are there are more grumnblings against the a6700, when we can consider how it has better rolling shutter and video dynamic range than the r7.
It also has the best video autofocus and lens breathing compensation, compared to the low performance of fujis when it comes to autofocus. And lastly the lens options; you cant beat sony when it comes to 3rd party lenses. I believe all of these 3 cameras are great and theres no need to grumble too much against the a6700 which is in my opinion the better choice if your mainly a content creator and not just focused on photography. Sony could have done better but the a6700 can go against the r7 and xs20.
Great job on the video folks! Thanks for making it. I think Sony does have another camera coming soon.
I bet a ZV-1f mkii which will have 14mm f8 fixed aperture lens, user can add fake depth of field effects in Catalyst.
You guys are the best, keep up the great work and thanks for everything. Always love a new video from this channel.
"Sony's autofocus just works" As an A7iv owner, I'd say "detection and tracking work. Focusing sometimes does". You have to look at the stills to check the autofocus. The A6700 is better than the A7iv in this department, but it delivers only 85% of sharp pictures of moving subjects (Damien Bernal, Northrups).
That single SD card slot is so genius wow good job Sony hadn't thought of that just perfect way to lose footage forever thank you.
I like having a a6000 series form factor and functionality with the tech of the newest A7s. Will certainly keep an eye out for one would make a good concert bring along
If they bring out an updated A7C that'll be what you'd need, compact version of an A7iv
@@Spaghettikidost FF lenses are larger than APS-C lenses so a6xxx is still smaller than the a7c
Which concerts do you go to that allow any kind of interchangeable lens camera? A lot of venues don't want attendees who aren't officially covering the event to bring those in.
@@xWood4000 there are plenty of compact FE lens options for the equivalent aperature. Remember that FF is one stop brighter than APSC, so a Sigma 16mm f1.4 (400grams) is equivalent to 24mm f2.1 in Full frame terms. Samyangs 24mm f1.8 is almost half the weight (230 grams) while also being 1/3 of a stop faster
It's a cheaper FX30 with better grip and viewfinder. It's good enough package for me.
Not sure they'll ever make an A7000 really as they'd be encroaching A7 price by then.
What Sony could do though, is an A7000 being an APS-C A9 or A1, and in the A7 price territory. Specifically for croppers (i.e. for wildlife or sports pros / enthusiasts). Back in the DSLR era, Nikon did just that with their D500. It was APS-C, it was as expensive as a regular fullframe (D750), but had the same high end traits of their D5. That was a success formula (the D500 was a success AFAIK).
So, why not repeating the same tactics now in the mirrorless world. Unless Sony judges, that the niche is too small, or that an A7000 would become too popular (therefore cannibalizing full frame sales too much)?
That thing looks pretty huge compared to an A6000. If you waited this long, might as well wait for an A7C2
Hoverboard 1: Kai 0
Love the honest and fun review as usual Kai and Lok!
I have a a 6300 and this looks like a worthy upgrade
Yes I am on 6300 and just bought this cam
I sold my A6300 and bought the A6700, it's a huge update, I'm happy with the AF and the video.
6:50 Fuji is in trouble. If you say that you’ll still pick Sony over Fuji for stills because they have more compact lenses, then Fuji needs to rethink what they’re doing.
it is actually a Sony FX30 on a diferent body. oriented more to video than photograhy.
Isn't this the problem with all the different models so close together though? How do you fit an updated model in the range without it encroaching on or even surpassing on the more exotic models capabilities for less money...
I still have my a6100 from my first ever paycheck when I was 17 years old. Hmm do I upgrade or buy a new lens?
love this review! been watching kai and lok since the digitial rev days. it looks like to be a pretty nice camera. I really like what sony did to the mirrorless industry as a canon fanboy that didn;t switch to sony and waited it out until the so so r camera but the later r cameras are much nicer
keep up the great work!
I haven’t seen a single one of your videos in my feed in MONTHS… I didn’t know you were still making videos, I had to look you up 😅
Just bought my a6400 today from Adorama
Love the pentax hat
I agree with your review. But keep in mind this camera has not gone up in price despite all the camera price inflation in the last 4 years, so I would say it’s a good deal. Plus, I think the main improvements are with video instead of photography, with reduced rolling shutter and better processing
I understand your point of view. I would argue that it's the same price because there is not much innovation. Sonys is basically saying you need to buy a full frame camera to get a good hybrid camera. They're not even trying to compete with Fujifilm or Panasonic. They need at least one more aps-c that at the very least has 2 card slots, 6 or 8k open gate, high bitrate external recording with good codecs, and around 40 megapixels. Fujifilm has had cameras like this for a while now and Panasonic can do this type of thing with the micro four-thirds. In my opinion Cannon even has better apsc cameras. I would love to pay more money to get these features. The only thing Sony has right now is good autofocus.
@@johnrpittenger I guess it depends on what you are shooting, but to me the a6700 looks very good. I have an A7Siii, an A7C, and an a6500/6400. I don't need more than 4k 120 fps, and I don't need an extra card slot. (A7Siii is usually overkill for me, but I use it in studio.) I'd be happy with the A7C if it had 4k 60 fps. Sony's AI autofocus is industry leading. I have other cameras (Fuji X100V, Ricoh GRiii x, etc.) and the other brands are not quite there in AF. I will probably get the a6700 as a lightweight "do it all" hybrid to take on travel adventures. (Unless the A7Cii comes along soon to steal its thunder.)
Hey Kai I remembered all those gear reviews you did years ago, the one in particular that stood out was the a6000 it was revolutionary for mirrorless cameras at that time, I bought it after looking at your review and I still have it and it's still working really well. the a6700 likely has much better tech than the OG a6000 but they never updated the look and made it even bulkier nearing the size of an old DSLR. This camera for an apsc body is big and looks like an old camcorder from the 2000s tbh.
I think this camera might be a lot better than a lot of the review channels are making out. especially that chip. It's so tempting at such an affordable price. Nice channel as always. 1 card slot is a mistake even if the US channels are saying its not, you know the ones in bed with Sony.
Hi!
One of the best and most honest reviews I’ve seen!
You make good points. I’ve also been thinking about how easily Sony releases “new” cameras nowadays…
Oh well…
All best!
I liked the flip up screen .. a6400 for the win
You are hilarious! You're so gracefully informative while simultaneously being comically awkward! ❤
As someone coming from the a6600 I definitely feel like the upgrades are pretty solid. The AI chip, the screen going to the side, the 4k 120, and the SD card finally being on the side are really helpful in my opinion. If I was committed to my a6600 or if it was my main camera, I'd probably definitely upgrade, but since I have another main character, and the a6600 is already great, there isn't a major reason to upgrade. Maybe in the bigger picture if you look at all Sony cameras this might not be the best camera, but if you strictly use the a6000 series then this is a great upgrade.
And 10bit 4:2:2 recording.. Amazing for color correction
How does it compare to the Fuji S20 in terms of performance vs (same) price for the stated audience - hybrid shooters
Good point. A better comparison for sure.
I get your technical impression but did you LIKE the a6700 compared to the previous models...
...or are you on the fence?
This camera at this price but full frame.. That would have blown me away.
Sony will never release a full frame under 2K
@@joeb3619 that's a fair point. Although eventually it would drop below 2K and that would still make me happy. Until that day my A7II stays on active duty 😂
I was waiting for this video. ❤
Thanks Kai, refreshing views on it. So frustrating to see even Gerald Undone doing the typical RUclipsr bottom-licky thing over this model. 🙈
The XS-20 is very similar to the a6700 in terms of features and price
4:43 - Kai's Liam Gallagher impression with the walk and olive green jacket. lol
Next, RX100 VIII, with flippy screen.
11 fps is the same as the a6000 too not just the a6600. Seems like this should have got an update in 10 years.
Wow I stumbled upon This channel after a long time. It's been a decade since I used to watch Kai at digital rev.
With the multi port being removed, I'm wondering how you're supposed to attach remote shutter releases or intervelometers. Also, the buffer is still smaller than the a6500's, but that camera was ridiculous. Glad to see the SD slot is FINALLY faster and we FINALLY get USB-C, though. Tempted to grab one of these as an upgrade from my a6500.
The app, or one of the many other apps.
Best review on RUclips. The only honest one.
if you had to choose one : a7iv or a6700?
I love the Pentax hat!
Would you recommend this camera to a stills shooter? I do full time headshots and portraits and I want something light and fast, currently shooting FUJI XT5 but thinking of jumping. What lenses would you recommend to rival a 50mm and 85mm equivalent? Especially the 85.
Good to see you're not breaking/burning cameras anymore. Please don't get tempted. Nice video.
Well, this sensor on the a6700 is a lot more than just a couple of megapixels. It's a backlit sensor that combined with the AI processor, creates highly detailed and virtually noiseless images, even in low light situations. The jump from the a6600 is huge. Add to that the improved autofocus and this camera is more than competitive.
For the price point if you are already a sony user this is an excellent option. If you are a wildlife or event photographer this fills a large gap. The A74 has a crop option but the resulting image size in pixels is too low. The 6700 as a second camera to my a74 is a near perfect fit. The combination of the crop factor and the fairly high pixel count is perfect for bird photography with big telephotos.
I have an A9 and an A&RIV but want to get more into bird video and want to upgrade but this mix from the Sony parts bin ain't it. Rangefinder design, low quality evf, crappy screen and unimproved stabilisation but with great focussing and good video. I'm still waiting for the D500 style semi-pro style body. I'm not confident Sony will deliver and am looking over the fence at Nikon Z8 where I can at least use my lenses with the Megadep adapter.
sorry, why is it so thick? My NEX-7 is like 60% thinner lol
I think here in the US we look at this sort of camera very differently.
I see an A6700 as a solid third, fourth or fifth camera in a multicam setup because it has 10 bit and oversampling.
Or as a solid second shooter camera if they don’t have a Sony.
It’ll be easy to use because of the same batteries and easy to match in post thanks to 10 bit.
Or as a gimbal camera with the 17-70 2.8, thanks to the flip out screen.
Vlogging is out of style in America. It’s all talking head now. Vlogging can be visually overwhelming anyway with all the wobble and wide shots. Your honest opinion of a camera matters more to me than what you guys did when playing around with it.
Like your Pentax hat in Sony review!
Thanks for speaking out what I've been thinking about this "stills-centric" camera!
That was fun watching, thanks!
I went with the XH2s. I’ve went away from Fujifilm a handful of times and each time I’ve gravitated back to it, even though it does have its quirks there’s just something about it that makes me wanna pick up the camera
Hey Kai; why didn't you mention the Sony a6700 Doesn’t Ship to Customers With Any Way to Charge It?? Seriously man. No charger. No cable. nothing. How do you charge it???
I’m still waiting for my Fuji X-S20 to get some love…….
The trash camera that wobbles and can’t focus ? Lol
@@henrystravelcorner it’s past your bedtime, kid. If you haven’t used it then your opinion is trash.
I don't think this is a competitor for the X-T5 tbf, it's more Sony's answer to the XS-20. The X-T5 would compete with the A7 line.
the competition for the a6700 isnt the XT-5 it's the XS20.
Very cool video. Nothing serious. I continue to like this format. Concerning the camera itself: deceiving. FPS /buffer /displays / 1* SD card (in 2023 really?) / top shutter speed remains at 1/4000th . Is this thing accepting at least a grip for vertical shooting ?
At this point, manufacturers don’t even care. They just want money…
This is the best a6700 video. Besides the information and thoughts, the fun side of the video was fantastic.
I did not just laugh a lot, I also laughed so loud because I wasn't able to contain myself. I completely lost it at "Oh hello".
A great camera
A Meh of an upgrade
I bought my X-S20 a day before the A6700 was released - while I love it, I am getting IBIS wobbling in handheld video with wide lenses (13mm Viltrox F1.4). Are you getting IBIS wobbles on the A6700 at all with ultra wide lenses?
@@dakine1048 I'm talking about this: ruclips.net/video/YX7uYpV-rMc/видео.html - it doesn't happen on Sony.
This dude is the coolest!!!
You are comparing it with a Fuji that costs $1000 more - I would expect a lot more for the $1000, in your words "Still isn't up there with the Sony". Think of the lenses you can have for $1000.
It's not just 2mp more, it's a stacked sensor, the image quality has noticeably improved.
Looks like you had fun getting your exercise for the day though! :)
Where did you get that Pentax hat? 😀
love the foreboding Pentax hat!
Hey Kai, where can I get a Pentax cap like yours?
good to see the football stuff, great review, would have hoped for 6k
Kai always dresses so tastefully modern
Kai W is the Jeremy Clarkson of Photography, change my mind.
Kai has more self-awareness and isn't an overly arrogant self-absorbed cunt
It's intentional. He talked many years ago about how he got the DigitalRev job by selling a Top Gear style.
Since I don't have one and the last camera had no viewfinder, I'm in it for the viewfinder. Besides I have all those E-mount lenses.
A6700 obiously is the MID level APS-C, not the hi-end. That will be something with more resolution, two cards and other stuff.
that would cost closer to $2k and then people would say the canon r7 is a better deal then. since its got more resolution and dual card slot at a similar price to this.
Curious hat choice... I love Pentax so I noticed that.
Kai writing off his son’s toys as a business expense!
Only Kai could get away wearing a comical Pentax ball cap on a Sony review. Major street cred.
I stick with a6400 and that will work for me for years
I have the 6400 now, and I am looking to upgrade. For wildlife and bird photography it’s not the best camera. Fuji has released I believe two or three updates with the last one just in May for AF. In regards to AF, Fuji may not be as good as Sony or Canon, but I suspect it’s a big improvement coming from a 6400 or even a 6600, as they don’t even have wildlife tracking.
What is the area you are filming?)
Too bad Fuji hasn’t had a camera in stock for the past 3 years….
Why still no review of X-S20 ??
Do you think it's better than the Fujifilm X-S20?
nope
stills? pretty much the same, but for video i still think sony edge on auto focus
@@fantrollgamerlvmaxBesides AF and rolling shutter the X-S20 is simply superior. A6700 is a not a good buy unless you're helplessly invested in E-mount.
@@AndreasRavnestad thanks!
Same BSI sensor my Fuji had 3 years ago?
Did you take the wrong cap?!
6:22 we should talk about that difference in dynamic range 😮
Yeah very meh update. I originally switched to Sony from Nikon because it seemed like Sony was the innovator and Nikon was stuck in the past but now it seems like Nikon (and all the other brands) are doing amazing things and Sony is now the one stuck behind. The A7RV was pretty good but a lot like this camera when you break it down the only actual updates were new menus, better AF and the admittedly awesome tilty/flippy screen but it still had the same old ridiculously slow sensor from the A7RIV. The last few cameras have all been pretty disappointing and that combined with their stance on on not releasing firmware updates is making me start considering switching to another brand. Really the only thing holding me back right now are my 9 E mount lenses.
Sony went full Canon on us these last 2 years!
Is a6400 BSI? Would this thing have better sensitivity?
This or the Fuji X-S20? 🤔
It's been forever since the a6600!
Quick question:
1.Canon R7?
2.Sony A6700?
Depends from your actual equipment 💁♀💁♀ No need to reinvest money.
Great video. My work camera is a fuji xh2. Great camera for stills and video. Recently I had the opportunity to use an a7iv for a gig and I kept comparing it to my xh2.. and really, xh2 far exceeds the capability of the a7iv in every way except, autofocus tracking and the obvious low light improvement of full frame. I purchased an a6700 as a travel camera, and im considering selling off my xh2 for a7iv... reasons:
I love having a full frame camera for numerous reasons and a smaller less expensive travel camera. With sony, I can have that and only buy fe lenses. While always having similar results.
Fuji xh2 8k pro res is absolutely incredible... but editing 4k is faster, meaning sony would give me enough and speed up my work flow, something I noticed after using the a7iv for a project.
I hate to say it, but sony does make things simpler IMO. And these days, getting projects shot, edited and out quick is becoming more and more important.
Had an xt5 and the single point autofocus was so bad that I switched to the a6700.
I ordered the kit and a couple lenses in hopes they will replace my 2 A1’s 😎
I call it the Sony A66Chungus because of how thick it is.