Her family killed her. Who would sit in that house long enough to write a 2.5 page ransom note then leave the body behind? No one. 1. You wouldn't wait til you were in the house to write the note. 2. You would bring some kind of weapon and not rely on what the family already had, like the rope and paintbrush from Patsy's art supplies. 3. There would have been signs of an intruder. Footprints, hairs, fibers, etc. Whoever killed her was all over that house. JonBenét's bedroom where she was sleeping, the office where Patsy kept her stationary, the kitchen where the flashlight was found, and the basement where JonBenét's body was discovered. No way in hell the 3 other people didn't notice what was going on.
Actually who in the world would incriminate themselves by using John's bonus amount as ransom an movie quotes from posters in her basement. Makes absolute no sense. Never convince me Patsy was stupid enough to do that.
Everything you said is Rubbish & untrue. You too show yourself to be totally Ignorant about this crime, this case & about Life matters in general. You're just someone Else who doesn't have the brain cells for True crime & neither did the 7-8 investigators from the Boulder PD who had Never worked a murder case before either. Stick to your one hour made up simple plot TV crime shows, that tell ya the beginning, the middle & the end. And get this through your head lovey - No parent would torture then slaughter their child & then would find it Feasible to try to disguise their handwriting, by Handwriting a 365 words & numbers ransom note Plus use their Own notepad to do that & put that on the hall table For The Cops plus use their Own marker & put that in the pen cup For The Cops. Nor would Any parent then tell the cops, homicide detectives & everyone else that they found the 3 pages spread out on the rung of the back staircase! More than one useless money grubbing cop had Moron Syndrome & it's clear that it's still spreading like a fn Disease. Now listen up with both ears or get a responsible Adult to read this aloud for ya - this case has never been to Trial so something called Case Evidence has Never been presented in Any way, shape of form so You, the general public know Nothing about this case let alone anything True. I actually pity all those who believe the Fake writing ‘samples’, as If Patsy did those letters & as If the pages are from the police files. All types of A##holes set forth to Con the public so as to make Money from this crime. The Ramseys were Proven Innocent a long, Long time ago with a mountain of Actual evidence & by a whole bunch of Actual experts under the umbrella of Law Enforcement, who included expert Seasoned investigators who had to be brought into this case, expert Crime Scene techs & expert DNA & forensic Scientists. You & your like are Nobodies who get off on the never ending False information shitshows that keep coming for your Entertainment due to your Hate filled mindless Characters. The endless videos, new & old, are your tabloid magazines. Got it? Three so-called detectives put their mugs on TV trying to make Money from this high profile crime. All 3 had Never worked a murder case before & so, had never Solved one. Steve Thomas made up a story about Patsy with Zero evidence to back his mouth. Linda Arndt implied a story about John with Zero evidence to back her mouth. James Kolar made up a story about Burke with Zero evidence to back his mouth & that further demented crap was turned into a Bogus documentary put out by CBS in 2016 & you all lapped it up like panting puppies. That show started the never ending Garbage about the 9 year old Kid that continues unabated to this day yet CBS & each of the Con Artist Paid Pipers were mightily Sued for their 'gross misleading of the public'. Just another Fact that you cold hearted Neanderthals choose to Ignore. Thomas was sued Also. At least Arndt found some integrity & publicly Apologised for her Lies told trying to also fund her retirement. You TV consumptive morons believe All of the 'theories' because you're also, not very bright & all your hooha about Nothing burgers just makes you all Pathetic. FYI - all Ramseys were Proven INNOCENT & finally Officially exonerated in 2008 due to all the evidence known at that time, over 200 pieces of, that Showed someone Was in that house. And the investigation continued with grown up Actual homicide investigators who had full Integrity & who worked tirelessly Unpaid, because Their sole purpose was to find a highly sadistic child killer. None wrote a book trying to line their own pockets. Last December a cold case team were put together by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation & they’re on the job. The DNA being saliva, from one of the unknown male intruders was mixed in with one spot of JB's blood in the big underpants that he & his cohort put on her, has been in CODIS since 2003. That DNA did Match the DNA from under JB's pinkie fingernails & the DNA from 2 places on the waistband of the long-johns, inside & outside there, being pulled up/down. As of the results in 2016 with advanced forensics - the 2nd unknown male's DNA, also on the long-johns & he is hispanic. The cold case team also have the go-ahead to have both perps’ DNA reanalysed with the advanced technology & can have untested evidence items from the BPD’s dungeon, to be analysed with same. The FBI are involved with this investigation, finally. Got it Now?
Wasn't there another little girl from her dance class who lived a couple blocks down who also got assaulted? If I remember correctly, the guy jumped off of her balcony and got away, and the police threw away the sheets instead of keeping them as evidence 🤦♂
Yeah, that was the "Amy Attack" Glad you saw that it just came out that they Threw the Sheets Away when they couldn't find DNA on them years ago. Really Shows How Incompetent the Boulder Police Department Is.
Yes, you are correct. Was DNA samples taken from the other victim? How did the perpetrator break in? Does anyone who were at the pageant contest’s remember seeing a man that was peculiar? So many questions. But are the two crimes connected? This is one of many circumstances where boulder police have failed so poorly.
@@tonymichaelaquino When the BPD could Not find DNA on her sheets (many years ago), they simply Threw Away The Sheets 🤬. The Perp is said to have been Lying in Wait Waiting for the Family to come home, He Jumped Out a Window To Escape. There were Two Different Men Seen at JonBenet's Recent Performances That Raised Suspicion, One of them was cleared, the other is still a mystery. There were Camel Blue Cigarette Butts found outside of Both the "Amy" & JonBenet Crime Scenes. The one's at the Ramsey scene were tested, One came back positive for Amylase (Saliva DNA), But Nothing Else Was Ever Reported Regarding That. They Were 9 Months Apart From Each Other & I Personally Don't Think They Were Connected, But Since the BPD Failed on Both Investigations We Will Likely Never Know.
The Ramseys were Proven innocent a long time ago & finally officially Exonerated in 2008 but the never ending full of the same old False information shitshows keep coming for the Entertainment of the next generations of hate-filled also Highly ignorant Victim bashers. There is Nothing to say that Maddie is even deceased so all that you disgusting people spout about her poor parents also, is Moot.
@@linda10989 Even the Victim Advocates, Jedamus & Morlock, are Said to Have Been Cleaning Up The Fingerprinting Dust Behind the Crime Scene Technicians 🤨😖
This is the same channel that has recently posted not one but two (2) videos suggesting Scott Peterson is innocent, and…oh yeah, OJ Simpson’s son might’ve actually committed the murders, 😂. Notice any pattern here? It’s called click-bait.
@@johndoh5479 What are you talking about? The Scott Peterson video was talking about how the innocence project recently took up his case, and went over the details showing how its extremely likely that he DID do it. You must just look at the thumbnails without actually watching.
Does this guy look like he could’ve written a two and a half page ransom note on the family stationary? Didn’t think so. It was Burke and the parents covered it up.
just because a prisoner says he or she did a crime , dosnt mean they are telling the truth, how many prisoners over the last 10 years have claimed they were the ones who did a crime, only to find out they lied...its a common thing for a prisoner to do.......i still think someone in that family had something to do with her death, this is just a distraction
Just because useless cops turn themselves into authors by making up absurd stories about this unsolved murder for no other reason than to line their own pockets, does Not mean that they're telling the Truth. And so, the never ending BS continues about this Proven Innocent family whilst Loads of others also out to make Money spout the same old False information as a distraction to get Your money too. LOL.
There’s no chance the parents weren’t involved. If you look deeper into this case, you’ll find all sorts of corruption. The DA and Police Chief were very close friends of the father. It’s theorized that she was sexually abused to death at a party the night she was killed, and the parents brought her home and staged her body. The killing really makes no sense at all. Someone broke in while they were home, took the time to sit in the kitchen and write a ransom, and then decide to not take her out of the house? How did the parents and police search the house but not find her? Then later, the father and his friend happen to find her after the police left? Yea ok. It’s nonsense. The parents were absolutely involved and you can’t convince me otherwise.
They weren’t involved but initially suspected their son had killed jonbenet and attempted to cover for him. But it turns out an intruder was actually responsible.
Was he also friends with the medical examiner? I ask because if she was abused to death, I’d expect to see many more violent injuries. IIRC, she primarily suffered a skull fracture and was then strangled. Wouldn’t all the abuse injuries also appear in the autopsy report? There is so much in this case that doesn’t make sense. Though, I think your suggestion that the person who did this was known to the Ramsay’s and perhaps the Ramsey’s allowed their child to be abused is one of the few scenarios I think does make sense. Perhaps she was accidentally killed mid abuse, and then the parents helped covered up the crime to protect their secret. The 2 biggest issues I have is that the DNA did not match the family (so someone had to put in there) and also that the ransom note being from inside the house (implying the parents or someone they knew were involved). It’s just so bizarre.
@@wulfsorenson8859 the letter being written from materials inside the home and the request, it’s wording and syntax, and for the specific amount requested all highly indicate family involvement. Go roll your eyes at someone else. My premise is that she may have been SA’d with her parent’s knowledge and permission (hardly the first time someone’s pimped out their kid) and the parents covered it up when something went bad.
@@ajstramaski6211 like I said…the parents initially panicked and thought the son had killed jonbenet. He had a history of violence towards her. They were heard screaming what have you done to the boy during a police call…They most likely wrote the letter to protect him not realising an intruder and killed her. She was SA’d but by some random intruder not by her parents. There’s no evidence or reason for the parents to ‘pimp out their kid’. That’s slander…The DNA clearly confirms someone unknown did this crime🙄
The ransom note was most likely written in a panic by the mother who incorrectly thought her son had killed jonbenet. The parents failed to realise at the time an intruder had killed her and attempted to protect their son by faking a ransom note…Hence all the confusion and suspicion around the case.
@@TheHurricaneEA the DNA proved it was an intruder that killed jonbenet. However their son’s past violent behaviour towards his sister led to them initially believing it was him who’d attacked and killed her. In a panic they freaked out and wrote that silly ransom note to protect him. Weren’t they heard screaming in the background ‘what did you do’ to Burt during a police call?!
@@shoogarplum4436a parent who just found one child brutally murdered and desperately dont want to loose ur other child who at the moment u believe did it
How does a random intruder know the exact amount of the fathers Christmas bonus in order to include it in a very in depth ransom note? Also, what intruder breaks into a home and nonchalantly takes their time to tie a person up, murder them, write a ransom note then leave? Also if that was my daughter I would have had the wherewithal to not let anyone contaminate that crime scene. No person would have been casually strolling around that home. There's also evidence that the marks on the body wasn't left by a stun gun but instead left by some metal model train track found in the brothers bedroom. But because the initial investigation was conducted so poorly, the truth will never be known
@dannyblanchflower1882 Danny, I have no idea what you mean in either comment. I haven't read anything about it. I watched a RUclips documentary, and those were my observations
@dannyblanchflower1882 Are you saying that a newspaper article randomly referenced the amount a person was paid as a Xmas bonus before the murder took place? Because the police believe that a stranger would only have known the amount if they'd have gone into the fathers desk drawer where there was believed to be a payslip stating the amount
@dannyblanchflower1882 I literally only watched one documentary quite recently. It was a 2024 documentary, so I'm shocked they left that out. That would be a really important thing to include. I'm actually shocked at that. Thanks for that update, Danny
Your Overall Video is Righteous 👍!!! However, You Have Numerous Inaccuracies 😖, Below are Clarification for those that I noticed: The 911 call on the 23rd would have been in the Evening, Not the Morning. She got the Bike that morning at her house, not that evening at the White's. John's "Christmas Bonus" of $118,117.50 was from 1995, Issued in Feb of 1996 and on each of his paystubs through-out '96. The Long-John DNA was Not discovered until a few years after the DNA under her fingernails &. on her panties. The Image you use at the 6:48 mark is Not the Window in the Ramsey Home that is Relevant to This Case. The Foliage under the Window Well Grate was Not Growing There, It Was Freshly Pressed Indicating Someone Had Likely Lifted & Lowered That Grate Recently. & While there Was a Faint Shoe Impression on Top of That Suitcase (along with a tiny piece of glass), the well-known Hi-Tec Shoe Print was found Next to JonBenet's Body in the "Wine Cellar" Room. Oliva was an Interesting Suspect but as you stated his DNA Was collected, compared, & Cleared in 2001. He himself has gone on television saying he did Not commit this crime. Vail's Story does Not Add Up, He says Oliva called him on the evening of the 26th, then he got up the next morning and saw it as a headline on his California Newspaper, Yet it was Not Headline News until at earliest the 28th, it was nothing but a small blurb in a Much Smaller Local Colorado Newspaper on the 27th. Glad You Touched On Helgoth, Now HE Was A Good Suspect!!! His DNA was Cleared, but He & His "Former Colleague" John Stephen Gigax Need Further Scrutiny IMO Amongst Quite A Few Other Highly Viable Overlooked Suspects that the BPD has Failed to Properly Clear or Even Investigate 😖🤬
This is John Andrew Ramsey, so take it with a grain of salt. Yes he knows some true facts, but he is exstremely bias due to the fact that he doesnt want his children living with this family murder over their heads. Js..
The whole investigation was botched from the start. People were allowed to come and go which contaminated a possible crime scene, the parents weren't separated to be questioned, the child's body was moved not once but twice, and the police never questioned the 911 dispatcher. I know the parents were ruled out as suspects but personally I'm still suspicious. Like why didn't they check the whole house before calling the police? Why didn't the police immediately conduct their own search upon arrival? Why did Patsy go calling all the family to tell them about the "kidnapping"? Why did the police let people come and go? And IF there was a kidnapper, why would he/she write a ransom note nearly three pages long? How did they know how much the Christmas bonus was and why demand that specific amount? And how did they break into the house, take the little girl from her bed, carry her all the way down to the basement, assault/beat/murder her and then exit the house without leaving something behind (ie. hairs, fibres) or making some kind of noise? Because unless the murderer used the stun gun before taking her downstairs I'm willing to bet that child would've been kicking and screaming the house down. And surely there'd have been signs of a struggle if that were the case? None of it makes any sense.
John discovered the body, in the coal cellar, in the basement and without turning on a light. When told to search the house by the cops (which was horrendously stupid) he went straight for the basement. Someone, or multiple someones in that family killed that poor kid. It's blatantly obvious and completely despicable that none of them were held accountable for it.
@onesolvedmystery2274 That is in no way what happened here. JonBenét never left her house that night and there is zero evidence of the supposed intruder. If you were going to kidnap a child for ransom and she died during the attempt, would you leave the body behind? Because that's pretty damn stupid if yes. Whoever killed her had time to sit in that house and write a rambling, 2.5 page ransom note. By hand. But didn't take the body. Come on.
@@LilyRose8959 "zero evidence of the supposed intruder" ?!?!?!? There is Plenty of Evidence This Was An Intruder !!! Most Notably the Consistent Unidentified Caucasian Male DNA that was found: Under her Fingernails, on Both Sides of her Long-Johns, & Co-mingled With Her Blood in her Panties (Co-Mingled, Not Layered, Co-Mingled!!!). For which there is No Innocent Explanation For !!!! Then There Is, the Unidentified Palm Print found on the "Wine Cellar" Door, the Unidentified Axillary Hair found on the White Blanket she was found wrapped in, & 2 Sets of Unidentified Shoe Impressions Found in the Basement (One Hi-Tec Brand, the other believed to be from a pair of SAS Shoes). They Found TWO Doors Ajar That Morning, the Butler Pantry Door on the North side of the home (Crime Scene Photo #70) & One of the French Doors on the West Wall of the Southern Dining Room (BPD Report #1-59). There is the Missing Air Tazer brand Stun Gun (which Dr Michael Doberson later states was the most likely instrument to have caused those marks), the Missing Tip of the Paintbrush, 9 Pages Missing from the center of the Notepad where the Ransom Note came from (& is known to have been used to write a "practice note" as it left bleed-through on the Ransom Note that was left). The Rope that was used for her ligatures & the Tape used on her mouth has also Never Been Sourced to Anything in that home. You may have read a few of the Bias B.S. Books written on this case (which most of them got their arses sued off for) and/or watched a few of the sensationalized "Crock-umentaries" that have been put out (which likewise, got their arses sued off). But the ACTUAL Evidence In This Case Indicates This Was Most Likely An Intruder That Committed This Heinous Crime. And While You Believe "It's blatantly obvious and completely despicable that none of them (the Ramseys) were held accountable for it.", I Find It Blatantly Obvious that an Intruder Did This & Completely Despicable that people that really know very little about this case Wrongfully Accuse this Innocent Family. 😖😖😖Shameful.
I have always thought it was burke it makes no sense to forge a ransom note if a stranger killed her it was to try getting police to look somewhere else
Great work but you got a few pieces of your info mixed up. When Oliva was arrested in 2016, (not 2000) they found photos on his phone. CPD got a tip he was uploading underage material. There was no phone on earth that could hold 300 photos in 2000. I was confused when I heard this and had to look it up.
It was obviously the little brother. The parents covered it up and the police helped. You left out that all the evidence was stuff that came from inside the house. The paper the note was written on along with the items used to make the garrote.
13:57 Regarding Oliva's handwriting not matching the ransom note, this is not correct. The way he formed letters when printing absolutely does match that on the ransom note. The examples can be found quite easily on the internet. It's quite strikingly similar and not easily faked.
Oliva Was Cleared by DNA in 2001 & has gone on television saying he did Not commit this crime. The supposed Handwriting Expert "Dr Mozelle Martin" who has put out all this information on Oliva is a Fraud & a Con, who is Easily Discredited
You've made a few mistakes here. 1. Handwriting experts have said they believe the note was written by Oliva. 2. Jon Benet's brother has said he owned a pair of Hi-Tech shoes. 3. I believe the amount specified in ransom note was published in a newspaper article on John prior to JonBenet's death.
1) "Dr Mozelle Martin" Is a Fraud, Her Degrees are Fake, & She Accused Patsy of Being the Author Just A Few Years Ago 2) Burke thought his Boots were "High Tech" Because They Had A Compass on Them (But There Were Not Hi-Tec Brand) 3) John's Bonus from 1995 of $118,117.50 was Not Public Knowledge Before The Crime
For the people who think the family wrote the ransom note, why would they choose the amount of his bonus? I’ve never understood this thinking. Like that number was just on their mind or something? Or it’s supposed to imply that the imaginary kidnappers knew about the bonus?
A neighbor heard a girl’s scream that might, the parents didn’t hear because they took sleeping pills and slept in different floors on opposite sides from jonbenets room ,also they have renovated the house and had sound proof walls . The police doesn’t want to release the DNA for testing 🤔family tree genealogy test
The neighbor later said it "could have been a psychic scream". She cast doubt on her own testimony. Unless I'm mistaken Lou Smit carried out tests in the basement to see if the scream would have travelled upstairs. It didn't.
@@dannyblanchflower1882 Yes the Current Acting Deputy Chief NOW, Who was Just a Detective Back Then, Barry Hartkopp, Changed His Police Report A Year Later to Add The "Negative Energy" Comment to Her Original Statement, Which According to Former Boulder "Duh-Fective" Steve Thomas (In His Book) Is A Big No-No 🤨😖🤬 But We Know Now (Thanks to Paula Woodward's Book) That A Second Neighbor Also Heard That Scream, So the Whole Negative Energy Thing Was Just A Bunch More of the BPD'S B.S. !!! 🤬🤬🤬
Weird thing you folks that decided to become armchair detectives & talk about & say things as if they're factual when they are anything but. It's an odd thing, really. 😊
Uhh no the police didn’t. The father was good friends with the DA and police chief. There was a lot of corruption going on in this case. I believe whole heartedly that the parents were involved. Never before in the history of crime has a case like this ever happened by a random intruder. Taking the time to write a random inside the home, taking the child down to the basement and then just deciding not to take her? The police and parents supposedly searched the home but never found her, then when the police leave the father and his friend find her in the basement? The same friend whose house they were partying at earlier that night? Lol. The father Ramsay was a creep and so was his wife. It’s likely that they were allowing their children to be sexually abused at elite parties, it went too far, she died, and they staged the home invasion/kidnapping/murder at their home. Hence why the friend whose party they were at was there every step of the way, to ensure it went the way they wanted it to.
I clearly believe this was a kidnap ransom that turned murder when they couldn't keep JB quiet. The ransom letter wreacs of hate an jealousy against John. 2 biggest suspects had keys to house bad financial debt which align with the kidnap ransom plot knew family well knew ramseys br was on top floor knew JB br was 2nd floor other end of house knew JB dog was at the neighbors barnhill house where 1 of huge suspects lived in basement.2 biggest suspects who easily knew everything to pull this off an get away with it was housekeeper an Meyer. Many believe Helgoth an Wolf was involved. None of these day 1 suspects left DNA or fingerprints. Last DNA test from 2008 from JB fingernails an underpants was linked to 2 unknown males 1 was a Hispanic these i clearly believe were accomplice to ringleader. Cant believe many think patsy was stupid enough to use John's bonus amount as ransom an movie quotes from posters in her basement. Never heard of someone incriminate themselves covering up a crime. Just an evil murder of a baby girl an a complete untrained police still clueless to solve it. ....So sorry JB you are with our Lord now....
I know this is very sad but this happened so long ago let her RIP there are so many children out there that are at this minute getting hurt ana abused we should be trying to get help for them this world is so evil
@siti1ca Why don't you head down to your local police department, have a look at their mugshots and clear up all 99% of their cold cases for them? You utter genius.
No he did Not & it's known for quite some time now that the print was from a Hi-Tec Shoe. There was also a partial shoe print from a different shoe also in the cellar.
I didn’t even watch more than two seconds of the video. I just came here to tell you you’re a Clickbait troll. They literally proved that he wasn’t even in the same city whenever she died. Do her parents have you on payroll or were you just hoping for Clickbait?
@@dannyblanchflower1882 your generations inability to do any research or try to educate themselves is downright disturbing. You’re on a video hosting platform. You are aware that you can search for things online and you are not holy at the whims of the algorithm??? You see the little round circle with the line at the top of the screen? So that is something called a search bar. If you click that and type in John Benet Ramsey on the thing called a keyboard, it will pull up videos about the Benet Ramsey case and then you can watch them and get information for yourself. Information that has been public knowledge since I was literally seven years old. You can actually do something for yourself! Instead of expecting the rest of the world to explain things to you like you’re the main characters and they’re just NPC’s who owe you their time.
I think we can all agree that with the way the police bungled the investigation, that poor little girl will never get justice.
I Hope You Are Not Right 😖
@@onesolvedmystery2274 I really hope so too, but we have to be honest--too much evidence was destroyed.
I don’t think so. I think the Ramseys got in the way of the investigation & as usual blamed police
Read Foreign Faction if you want to understand the full timeline. It's eye opening
Her family killed her. Who would sit in that house long enough to write a 2.5 page ransom note then leave the body behind? No one. 1. You wouldn't wait til you were in the house to write the note. 2. You would bring some kind of weapon and not rely on what the family already had, like the rope and paintbrush from Patsy's art supplies. 3. There would have been signs of an intruder. Footprints, hairs, fibers, etc. Whoever killed her was all over that house. JonBenét's bedroom where she was sleeping, the office where Patsy kept her stationary, the kitchen where the flashlight was found, and the basement where JonBenét's body was discovered. No way in hell the 3 other people didn't notice what was going on.
Actually who in the world would incriminate themselves by using John's bonus amount as ransom an movie quotes from posters in her basement. Makes absolute no sense. Never convince me Patsy was stupid enough to do that.
Everything you said is Rubbish & untrue. You too show yourself to be totally Ignorant about this crime, this case & about Life matters in general. You're just someone Else who doesn't have the brain cells for True crime & neither did the 7-8 investigators from the Boulder PD who had Never worked a murder case before either. Stick to your one hour made up simple plot TV crime shows, that tell ya the beginning, the middle & the end.
And get this through your head lovey - No parent would torture then slaughter their child & then would find it Feasible to try to disguise their handwriting, by Handwriting a 365 words & numbers ransom note Plus use their Own notepad to do that & put that on the hall table For The Cops plus use their Own marker & put that in the pen cup For The Cops. Nor would Any parent then tell the cops, homicide detectives & everyone else that they found the 3 pages spread out on the rung of the back staircase!
More than one useless money grubbing cop had Moron Syndrome & it's clear that it's still spreading like a fn Disease.
Now listen up with both ears or get a responsible Adult to read this aloud for ya - this case has never been to Trial so something called Case Evidence has Never been presented in Any way, shape of form so You, the general public know Nothing about this case let alone anything True.
I actually pity all those who believe the Fake writing ‘samples’, as If Patsy did those letters & as If the pages are from the police files. All types of A##holes set forth to Con the public so as to make Money from this crime.
The Ramseys were Proven Innocent a long, Long time ago with a mountain of Actual evidence & by a whole bunch of Actual experts under the umbrella of Law Enforcement, who included expert Seasoned investigators who had to be brought into this case, expert Crime Scene techs & expert DNA & forensic Scientists.
You & your like are Nobodies who get off on the never ending False information shitshows that keep coming for your Entertainment due to your Hate filled mindless Characters.
The endless videos, new & old, are your tabloid magazines. Got it?
Three so-called detectives put their mugs on TV trying to make Money from this high profile crime. All 3 had Never worked a murder case before & so, had never Solved one. Steve Thomas made up a story about Patsy with Zero evidence to back his mouth. Linda Arndt implied a story about John with Zero evidence to back her mouth. James Kolar made up a story about Burke with Zero evidence to back his mouth & that further demented crap was turned into a Bogus documentary put out by CBS in 2016 & you all lapped it up like panting puppies. That show started the never ending Garbage about the 9 year old Kid that continues unabated to this day yet CBS & each of the Con Artist Paid Pipers were mightily Sued for their 'gross misleading of the public'. Just another Fact that you cold hearted Neanderthals choose to Ignore. Thomas was sued Also. At least Arndt found some integrity & publicly Apologised for her Lies told trying to also fund her retirement.
You TV consumptive morons believe All of the 'theories' because you're also, not very bright & all your hooha about Nothing burgers just makes you all Pathetic.
FYI - all Ramseys were Proven INNOCENT & finally Officially exonerated in 2008 due to all the evidence known at that time, over 200 pieces of, that Showed someone Was in that house. And the investigation continued with grown up Actual homicide investigators who had full Integrity & who worked tirelessly Unpaid, because Their sole purpose was to find a highly sadistic child killer. None wrote a book trying to line their own pockets.
Last December a cold case team were put together by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation & they’re on the job. The DNA being saliva, from one of the unknown male intruders was mixed in with one spot of JB's blood in the big underpants that he & his cohort put on her, has been in CODIS since 2003. That DNA did Match the DNA from under JB's pinkie fingernails & the DNA from 2 places on the waistband of the long-johns, inside & outside there, being pulled up/down. As of the results in 2016 with advanced forensics - the 2nd unknown male's DNA, also on the long-johns & he is hispanic.
The cold case team also have the go-ahead to have both perps’ DNA reanalysed with the advanced technology & can have untested evidence items from the BPD’s dungeon, to be analysed with same.
The FBI are involved with this investigation, finally. Got it Now?
@@davidwilliams4498 I believe she was that stupid.
@@davidwilliams4498it was done to bring suspicion on others not themselves. First thing they did was try to pin it on the house keeper
Burt did it, at the beginning of the 911 call patsy whispered What have you done
Wasn't there another little girl from her dance class who lived a couple blocks down who also got assaulted? If I remember correctly, the guy jumped off of her balcony and got away, and the police threw away the sheets instead of keeping them as evidence 🤦♂
Yeah, that was the "Amy Attack" Glad you saw that it just came out that they Threw the Sheets Away when they couldn't find DNA on them years ago. Really Shows How Incompetent the Boulder Police Department Is.
Yes, you are correct. Was DNA samples taken from the other victim? How did the perpetrator break in? Does anyone who were at the pageant contest’s remember seeing a man that was peculiar? So many questions. But are the two crimes connected? This is one of many circumstances where boulder police have failed so poorly.
@@tonymichaelaquino When the BPD could Not find DNA on her sheets (many years ago), they simply Threw Away The Sheets 🤬. The Perp is said to have been Lying in Wait Waiting for the Family to come home, He Jumped Out a Window To Escape. There were Two Different Men Seen at JonBenet's Recent Performances That Raised Suspicion, One of them was cleared, the other is still a mystery. There were Camel Blue Cigarette Butts found outside of Both the "Amy" & JonBenet Crime Scenes. The one's at the Ramsey scene were tested, One came back positive for Amylase (Saliva DNA), But Nothing Else Was Ever Reported Regarding That. They Were 9 Months Apart From Each Other & I Personally Don't Think They Were Connected, But Since the BPD Failed on Both Investigations We Will Likely Never Know.
The family knows more, the mom specifically
Burt did it, at the beginning of the 911 call patsy whispered What have you done
I still think the Ramsey's and McCanns are guilty
If there were CCTV of Oliva and Brueckner carrying out the crimes - You still wouldn't believe it. They're both solid suspects.
The Ramseys were Proven innocent a long time ago & finally officially Exonerated in 2008 but the never ending full of the same old False information shitshows keep coming for the Entertainment of the next generations of hate-filled also Highly ignorant Victim bashers. There is Nothing to say that Maddie is even deceased so all that you disgusting people spout about her poor parents also, is Moot.
Hopefully the way the detectives and boulder police handled this investigation from the beginning, is taught to all new detectives and what NOT to do.
Text-Book Example of What Not To Do !!! 👍
Not securing the crime scene was the worst and kicking out all those visitors. Some of whom were allowed to clean!
@@linda10989 Even the Victim Advocates, Jedamus & Morlock, are Said to Have Been Cleaning Up The Fingerprinting Dust Behind the Crime Scene Technicians 🤨😖
$118,000 Christmas bonus.
What a life..
@@Brianvanmoustache and this was nearly 30 y.o. too!
Have you actually done any research on this case???
This is the same channel that has recently posted not one but two (2) videos suggesting Scott Peterson is innocent, and…oh yeah, OJ Simpson’s son might’ve actually committed the murders, 😂. Notice any pattern here? It’s called click-bait.
@@johndoh5479 What are you talking about? The Scott Peterson video was talking about how the innocence project recently took up his case, and went over the details showing how its extremely likely that he DID do it. You must just look at the thumbnails without actually watching.
Oj’s son makes sense….
Does this guy look like he could’ve written a two and a half page ransom note on the family stationary? Didn’t think so. It was Burke and the parents covered it up.
Actually he has a ton of time being homeless.
The parents thought it was Burke and tried to cover for him. But it was actually an intruder. Creepy af!
@@maureenjacobs3697 ask him to spell attache
just because a prisoner says he or she did a crime , dosnt mean they are telling the truth, how many prisoners over the last 10 years have claimed they were the ones who did a crime, only to find out they lied...its a common thing for a prisoner to do.......i still think someone in that family had something to do with her death, this is just a distraction
Just because useless cops turn themselves into authors by making up absurd stories about this unsolved murder for no other reason than to line their own pockets, does Not mean that they're telling the Truth. And so, the never ending BS continues about this Proven Innocent family whilst Loads of others also out to make Money spout the same old False information as a distraction to get Your money too. LOL.
WRONG! He didnt just receive that bonus, it was the bonus from the previous year (1995), and he got it in January 1996
There’s no chance the parents weren’t involved. If you look deeper into this case, you’ll find all sorts of corruption. The DA and Police Chief were very close friends of the father. It’s theorized that she was sexually abused to death at a party the night she was killed, and the parents brought her home and staged her body. The killing really makes no sense at all. Someone broke in while they were home, took the time to sit in the kitchen and write a ransom, and then decide to not take her out of the house? How did the parents and police search the house but not find her? Then later, the father and his friend happen to find her after the police left? Yea ok. It’s nonsense. The parents were absolutely involved and you can’t convince me otherwise.
They weren’t involved but initially suspected their son had killed jonbenet and attempted to cover for him. But it turns out an intruder was actually responsible.
Was he also friends with the medical examiner? I ask because if she was abused to death, I’d expect to see many more violent injuries. IIRC, she primarily suffered a skull fracture and was then strangled. Wouldn’t all the abuse injuries also appear in the autopsy report? There is so much in this case that doesn’t make sense. Though, I think your suggestion that the person who did this was known to the Ramsay’s and perhaps the Ramsey’s allowed their child to be abused is one of the few scenarios I think does make sense. Perhaps she was accidentally killed mid abuse, and then the parents helped covered up the crime to protect their secret. The 2 biggest issues I have is that the DNA did not match the family (so someone had to put in there) and also that the ransom note being from inside the house (implying the parents or someone they knew were involved). It’s just so bizarre.
@@ajstramaski6211 the DNA matching someone else clearly indicates this was an intruder 🙄
@@wulfsorenson8859 the letter being written from materials inside the home and the request, it’s wording and syntax, and for the specific amount requested all highly indicate family involvement. Go roll your eyes at someone else. My premise is that she may have been SA’d with her parent’s knowledge and permission (hardly the first time someone’s pimped out their kid) and the parents covered it up when something went bad.
@@ajstramaski6211 like I said…the parents initially panicked and thought the son had killed jonbenet. He had a history of violence towards her. They were heard screaming what have you done to the boy during a police call…They most likely wrote the letter to protect him not realising an intruder and killed her. She was SA’d but by some random intruder not by her parents. There’s no evidence or reason for the parents to ‘pimp out their kid’. That’s slander…The DNA clearly confirms someone unknown did this crime🙄
The ransom note was most likely written in a panic by the mother who incorrectly thought her son had killed jonbenet. The parents failed to realise at the time an intruder had killed her and attempted to protect their son by faking a ransom note…Hence all the confusion and suspicion around the case.
This is the only theory I've ever heard in the case that has made sense in all details.
@@TheHurricaneEA the DNA proved it was an intruder that killed jonbenet. However their son’s past violent behaviour towards his sister led to them initially believing it was him who’d attacked and killed her. In a panic they freaked out and wrote that silly ransom note to protect him. Weren’t they heard screaming in the background ‘what did you do’ to Burt during a police call?!
Genuinely curious, writing a ransom note out of panic makes no sense to me, who’s first instinct is to do that instead of call 911?
@@shoogarplum4436a parent who just found one child brutally murdered and desperately dont want to loose ur other child who at the moment u believe did it
@@shoogarplum4436 a mother trying to protect her only son will do anything it takes.
Two most famous fantastic characters in true crime: the ramsey case intruder and the maccann case abductor
How does a random intruder know the exact amount of the fathers Christmas bonus in order to include it in a very in depth ransom note? Also, what intruder breaks into a home and nonchalantly takes their time to tie a person up, murder them, write a ransom note then leave? Also if that was my daughter I would have had the wherewithal to not let anyone contaminate that crime scene. No person would have been casually strolling around that home. There's also evidence that the marks on the body wasn't left by a stun gun but instead left by some metal model train track found in the brothers bedroom. But because the initial investigation was conducted so poorly, the truth will never be known
@@dannyblanchflower1882 What reference?
@dannyblanchflower1882 Danny, I have no idea what you mean in either comment. I haven't read anything about it. I watched a RUclips documentary, and those were my observations
@dannyblanchflower1882 Are you saying that a newspaper article randomly referenced the amount a person was paid as a Xmas bonus before the murder took place? Because the police believe that a stranger would only have known the amount if they'd have gone into the fathers desk drawer where there was believed to be a payslip stating the amount
@dannyblanchflower1882 I literally only watched one documentary quite recently. It was a 2024 documentary, so I'm shocked they left that out. That would be a really important thing to include. I'm actually shocked at that. Thanks for that update, Danny
Read the easy to find online police report. It talks about 2 suspects who knew everything about family
Your Overall Video is Righteous 👍!!! However, You Have Numerous Inaccuracies 😖, Below are Clarification for those that I noticed:
The 911 call on the 23rd would have been in the Evening, Not the Morning.
She got the Bike that morning at her house, not that evening at the White's.
John's "Christmas Bonus" of $118,117.50 was from 1995, Issued in Feb of 1996 and on each of his paystubs through-out '96.
The Long-John DNA was Not discovered until a few years after the DNA under her fingernails &. on her panties.
The Image you use at the 6:48 mark is Not the Window in the Ramsey Home that is Relevant to This Case.
The Foliage under the Window Well Grate was Not Growing There, It Was Freshly Pressed Indicating Someone Had Likely Lifted & Lowered That Grate Recently.
& While there Was a Faint Shoe Impression on Top of That Suitcase (along with a tiny piece of glass), the well-known Hi-Tec Shoe Print was found Next to JonBenet's Body in the "Wine Cellar" Room.
Oliva was an Interesting Suspect but as you stated his DNA Was collected, compared, & Cleared in 2001. He himself has gone on television saying he did Not commit this crime. Vail's Story does Not Add Up, He says Oliva called him on the evening of the 26th, then he got up the next morning and saw it as a headline on his California Newspaper, Yet it was Not Headline News until at earliest the 28th, it was nothing but a small blurb in a Much Smaller Local Colorado Newspaper on the 27th.
Glad You Touched On Helgoth, Now HE Was A Good Suspect!!! His DNA was Cleared, but He & His "Former Colleague" John Stephen Gigax Need Further Scrutiny IMO
Amongst Quite A Few Other Highly Viable Overlooked Suspects that the BPD has Failed to Properly Clear or Even Investigate 😖🤬
Thanks for this
This is John Andrew Ramsey, so take it with a grain of salt. Yes he knows some true facts, but he is exstremely bias due to the fact that he doesnt want his children living with this family murder over their heads. Js..
@@kellyjacquin715 Don't Quit Your Day Job 🤣
@@onesolvedmystery2274 why would i???
I can't believe how badly this case was handles.
& Most People Don't Even Know Half of How Bad The Boulder PD Messed This Investigation Up, What They Have Done Borders Criminal !!!
I think the brother or mom did it and the dad covered it up
The whole investigation was botched from the start. People were allowed to come and go which contaminated a possible crime scene, the parents weren't separated to be questioned, the child's body was moved not once but twice, and the police never questioned the 911 dispatcher. I know the parents were ruled out as suspects but personally I'm still suspicious. Like why didn't they check the whole house before calling the police? Why didn't the police immediately conduct their own search upon arrival? Why did Patsy go calling all the family to tell them about the "kidnapping"? Why did the police let people come and go? And IF there was a kidnapper, why would he/she write a ransom note nearly three pages long? How did they know how much the Christmas bonus was and why demand that specific amount? And how did they break into the house, take the little girl from her bed, carry her all the way down to the basement, assault/beat/murder her and then exit the house without leaving something behind (ie. hairs, fibres) or making some kind of noise? Because unless the murderer used the stun gun before taking her downstairs I'm willing to bet that child would've been kicking and screaming the house down. And surely there'd have been signs of a struggle if that were the case? None of it makes any sense.
John discovered the body, in the coal cellar, in the basement and without turning on a light. When told to search the house by the cops (which was horrendously stupid) he went straight for the basement. Someone, or multiple someones in that family killed that poor kid. It's blatantly obvious and completely despicable that none of them were held accountable for it.
In 1991, 11 Year Old Jaycee Lee Duggard Was Stunned Unconscious For Her Abduction, So It Is Likely That Is What Happened To This Poor Little Girl.
@onesolvedmystery2274 That is in no way what happened here. JonBenét never left her house that night and there is zero evidence of the supposed intruder.
If you were going to kidnap a child for ransom and she died during the attempt, would you leave the body behind? Because that's pretty damn stupid if yes.
Whoever killed her had time to sit in that house and write a rambling, 2.5 page ransom note. By hand. But didn't take the body. Come on.
@@LilyRose8959 "zero evidence of the supposed intruder" ?!?!?!?
There is Plenty of Evidence This Was An Intruder !!! Most Notably the Consistent Unidentified Caucasian Male DNA that was found: Under her Fingernails, on Both Sides of her Long-Johns, & Co-mingled With Her Blood in her Panties (Co-Mingled, Not Layered, Co-Mingled!!!). For which there is No Innocent Explanation For !!!! Then There Is, the Unidentified Palm Print found on the "Wine Cellar" Door, the Unidentified Axillary Hair found on the White Blanket she was found wrapped in, & 2 Sets of Unidentified Shoe Impressions Found in the Basement (One Hi-Tec Brand, the other believed to be from a pair of SAS Shoes). They Found TWO Doors Ajar That Morning, the Butler Pantry Door on the North side of the home (Crime Scene Photo #70) & One of the French Doors on the West Wall of the Southern Dining Room (BPD Report #1-59). There is the Missing Air Tazer brand Stun Gun (which Dr Michael Doberson later states was the most likely instrument to have caused those marks), the Missing Tip of the Paintbrush, 9 Pages Missing from the center of the Notepad where the Ransom Note came from (& is known to have been used to write a "practice note" as it left bleed-through on the Ransom Note that was left). The Rope that was used for her ligatures & the Tape used on her mouth has also Never Been Sourced to Anything in that home.
You may have read a few of the Bias B.S. Books written on this case (which most of them got their arses sued off for) and/or watched a few of the sensationalized "Crock-umentaries" that have been put out (which likewise, got their arses sued off). But the ACTUAL Evidence In This Case Indicates This Was Most Likely An Intruder That Committed This Heinous Crime. And While You Believe "It's blatantly obvious and completely despicable that none of them (the Ramseys) were held accountable for it.", I Find It Blatantly Obvious that an Intruder Did This & Completely Despicable that people that really know very little about this case Wrongfully Accuse this Innocent Family. 😖😖😖Shameful.
Thats no ransom note, its a ransom book!!
The "Grill" had not been moved and was in place. Not sure why you didn't make that clear.
I have always thought it was burke it makes no sense to forge a ransom note if a stranger killed her it was to try getting police to look somewhere else
Lou Smit would have figured it out had he not passed away. RIP Lou the only
law man that really cared.
💯%👍
Zero dna. Not guilty
Yet another red herring.
Great work but you got a few pieces of your info mixed up. When Oliva was arrested in 2016, (not 2000) they found photos on his phone. CPD got a tip he was uploading underage material. There was no phone on earth that could hold 300 photos in 2000. I was confused when I heard this and had to look it up.
It was obviously the little brother. The parents covered it up and the police helped. You left out that all the evidence was stuff that came from inside the house. The paper the note was written on along with the items used to make the garrote.
Agree. That always made the most sense to me.
Either the brother did it or he KNOWS who did it.
13:57 Regarding Oliva's handwriting not matching the ransom note, this is not correct. The way he formed letters when printing absolutely does match that on the ransom note. The examples can be found quite easily on the internet. It's quite strikingly similar and not easily faked.
Oliva Was Cleared by DNA in 2001 & has gone on television saying he did Not commit this crime. The supposed Handwriting Expert "Dr Mozelle Martin" who has put out all this information on Oliva is a Fraud & a Con, who is Easily Discredited
You've made a few mistakes here. 1. Handwriting experts have said they believe the note was written by Oliva. 2. Jon Benet's brother has said he owned a pair of Hi-Tech shoes. 3. I believe the amount specified in ransom note was published in a newspaper article on John prior to JonBenet's death.
1) "Dr Mozelle Martin" Is a Fraud, Her Degrees are Fake, & She Accused Patsy of Being the Author Just A Few Years Ago
2) Burke thought his Boots were "High Tech" Because They Had A Compass on Them (But There Were Not Hi-Tec Brand)
3) John's Bonus from 1995 of $118,117.50 was Not Public Knowledge Before The Crime
Is John Ramsey a patron of this channel? Give it up already. Did this guy make Patsy write the ransom note too?
How about we start giving detectives IQ tests AND see if they're textbook narcissists, like so many, since they go for careers of power.
Power corrupts. Abosolute power corrupts absolutely!
I already solved this. It’s not this guy.
Do Tell, Do Tell............
For the people who think the family wrote the ransom note, why would they choose the amount of his bonus? I’ve never understood this thinking. Like that number was just on their mind or something? Or it’s supposed to imply that the imaginary kidnappers knew about the bonus?
Dude is clearly insane, he letters shouldnt be given any credit
If you had dirty deadly secrets which could eventually end you up in jail, would you rely your future and life on some old distant highschool friend?
All they have on this dude is circumstantial evidence. The parents have way more circumstantial evidence around them.
Poor kid😢😢rip angel
No idea how patsey won ms. West Virginia. There must have been zero competitors that year.
Look at who she cited in the talent portion, Muriel Spark who inspired pineapples as a snack in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
It was also in the 70s
Burt did it, at the beginning of the 911 call patsy whispered What have you done
Are Gary Oliva and Jon Oliva of the band Savatage relatives?
Ya I admitted to it too…. So what?
"The winner is the lion" Wait wrong channel.
This is a case where I really want to know who killed Jon
15:46 “That man.”? That’s a child
A neighbor heard a girl’s scream that might, the parents didn’t hear because they took sleeping pills and slept in different floors on opposite sides from jonbenets room ,also they have renovated the house and had sound proof walls . The police doesn’t want to release the DNA for testing 🤔family tree genealogy test
Odd Isn't It !?!?! 🤔
The neighbor later said it "could have been a psychic scream". She cast doubt on her own testimony. Unless I'm mistaken Lou Smit carried out tests in the basement to see if the scream would have travelled upstairs. It didn't.
@@dannyblanchflower1882 Yes the Current Acting Deputy Chief NOW, Who was Just a Detective Back Then, Barry Hartkopp, Changed His Police Report A Year Later to Add The "Negative Energy" Comment to Her Original Statement, Which According to Former Boulder "Duh-Fective" Steve Thomas (In His Book) Is A Big No-No 🤨😖🤬 But We Know Now (Thanks to Paula Woodward's Book) That A Second Neighbor Also Heard That Scream, So the Whole Negative Energy Thing Was Just A Bunch More of the BPD'S B.S. !!! 🤬🤬🤬
Stun gun or not, it was obviously an intruder. The cops just got tunnel vision on the parents.
Weird thing you folks that decided to become armchair detectives & talk about & say things as if they're factual when they are anything but. It's an odd thing, really. 😊
I’d blame the brother long before an intruder
@@SpinningCracKFisTfull time water carriers for Patsy
Uhh no the police didn’t. The father was good friends with the DA and police chief. There was a lot of corruption going on in this case. I believe whole heartedly that the parents were involved. Never before in the history of crime has a case like this ever happened by a random intruder. Taking the time to write a random inside the home, taking the child down to the basement and then just deciding not to take her? The police and parents supposedly searched the home but never found her, then when the police leave the father and his friend find her in the basement? The same friend whose house they were partying at earlier that night? Lol. The father Ramsay was a creep and so was his wife. It’s likely that they were allowing their children to be sexually abused at elite parties, it went too far, she died, and they staged the home invasion/kidnapping/murder at their home. Hence why the friend whose party they were at was there every step of the way, to ensure it went the way they wanted it to.
@@onemaddad3823 thaaaank yyyou
Jealous pageant mother did away with the competition........IMO
But a homeless could go through garbage and fi d account info
I clearly believe this was a kidnap ransom that turned murder when they couldn't keep JB quiet. The ransom letter wreacs of hate an jealousy against John. 2 biggest suspects had keys to house bad financial debt which align with the kidnap ransom plot knew family well knew ramseys br was on top floor knew JB br was 2nd floor other end of house knew JB dog was at the neighbors barnhill house where 1 of huge suspects lived in basement.2 biggest suspects who easily knew everything to pull this off an get away with it was housekeeper an Meyer. Many believe Helgoth an Wolf was involved. None of these day 1 suspects left DNA or fingerprints. Last DNA test from 2008 from JB fingernails an underpants was linked to 2 unknown males 1 was a Hispanic these i clearly believe were accomplice to ringleader. Cant believe many think patsy was stupid enough to use John's bonus amount as ransom an movie quotes from posters in her basement. Never heard of someone incriminate themselves covering up a crime. Just an evil murder of a baby girl an a complete untrained police still clueless to solve it. ....So sorry JB you are with our Lord now....
Oliver was just obsessed with her and maybe had a fantasy that he did it. Or maybe had a plan to do it but someone else beat him to it.
Dad😢😢
I still think the dad did it
I know this is very sad but this happened so long ago let her RIP there are so many children out there that are at this minute getting hurt ana abused we should be trying to get help for them this world is so evil
I never trusted the mom she's got that Hillary Clinton Vibe she even kind of looks like her
Poor girl 😢
just by looking at the mug shot......he did it
He actually didn't. What an ignorant thing to say regardless of origin or true meaning.
@siti1ca Why don't you head down to your local police department, have a look at their mugshots and clear up all 99% of their cold cases for them? You utter genius.
@@VI-rt7sh HAA 😆 🤣
(I LOVE IT)
haha, he wrote a legible and coherent 3 page ransom letter?
@@RJ-jc4zb exactly
👍
Not believable
Click bait troll. Unsubscribed. The misinformation you put out into the world does actually have an effect
Burke owned hi-tec boots
No he did Not & it's known for quite some time now that the print was from a Hi-Tec Shoe. There was also a partial shoe print from a different shoe also in the cellar.
I didn’t even watch more than two seconds of the video. I just came here to tell you you’re a Clickbait troll. They literally proved that he wasn’t even in the same city whenever she died. Do her parents have you on payroll or were you just hoping for Clickbait?
Thank You MILF Finder 4000
Too bad. They do cover the evidence that sheds doubt on him as a suspect. And they noted the oddity within the note.
How did they prove he wasn't in the same city?
@@dannyblanchflower1882 your generations inability to do any research or try to educate themselves is downright disturbing. You’re on a video hosting platform. You are aware that you can search for things online and you are not holy at the whims of the algorithm??? You see the little round circle with the line at the top of the screen? So that is something called a search bar. If you click that and type in John Benet Ramsey on the thing called a keyboard, it will pull up videos about the Benet Ramsey case and then you can watch them and get information for yourself. Information that has been public knowledge since I was literally seven years old. You can actually do something for yourself! Instead of expecting the rest of the world to explain things to you like you’re the main characters and they’re just NPC’s who owe you their time.