Prime Crime: Scott Peterson Wife Killer To Get A Second Chance?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
- Tonight on Prime Crime: The Scott Peterson case. The California man went on trial for the death of his wife, Laci Peterson and unborn son. We'll go over the new developments happening today.
#ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #PrimeCrime
Follow Jesse Weber on Twitter:
/ jessecordweber
Watch More Episodes of Prime Crime:
• Prime Crime with Jesse...
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on RUclipsTV!
tv.ruclips.net/user/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF Law&Crime Network RUclips Channels:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Stop trying to bully independent creators. It’s a bad look. And you keep digging deeper.
For real
Amen....these people are sad trolls with NO LIFE
Nick did nothing wrong.
Who is Nick?
Exactly law & crime just being cry baby haters and if they were smart they should of been thankful to get the exposure that Nick gave them.
@@JiveDadson A lawyer who got more views than Law and Crime, they seem to have the sads about it.
@@JiveDadson if you know, you know.
@@JiveDadson The YT lawyer with far superior content than Law&Crime
I think with jury misconduct alone he should be entitled to a new trial. What kind of country doesn't follow its own laws!? All of the spectators that showed up to the trial just to cheer to kill someone speaks volumes about the state of this country.
The alleged juror misconduct issue was tossed 8 months ago.
No new trial.
Can law and crime please cover a fair use copyright case? I think they need a refresher
No second chances! He is guilty! He is where he belongs.!!! Prison!
Yes guilty AF!
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
@@jwait1496 Yeah sure AOK.
Have a cool idea. Leave other RUclips channels alone. If you have law in the title of your channel you should know some.
Shut up
What do you mean?
@@LCx829 "shut up" very grown up! As pathetic as law n crime, its exactly what their saying as well! Perhaps it's law n crimes stealth profile!?
@@LCx829 brilliant response.
@@minkeuk549 Law&Crime is alleging copyright infringement to intimidate other content creators while offering no proof of copyright and apparently ignoring or being ignorant of the concept of fair use.
Stop being petty. Thumbs down.
He is a narcissist.He can only mimic emotion.
Such a tragedy for a young beautiful woman with so much promise
Completely heartbreaking. I’m a 73 year old widow and I don’t have much going anymore. I wish there was a way to trade places with Lacl. She was so beautiful and so loved by so many people. It breaks my heart that she wasn’t able to give birth to Connor and experience all the wonderful things that come to life when you have children. 💔
Dont go after RUclipsrs, it will backfire
“She” (Amber) was not having an affair with Scott. She thought he was single. Poor woman.
She knew
@@curious1053 tell me how they know Einstein
@@mikebryant8507 ??? What did she tell you?? What do you know we don’t?
"Affair" does not imply adultery.
Bollox she knew and they always know and have suspicions and furthermore he were married: it were an affair
Law and crime needs to get an attorney to explain copyright law to them as they are so wrong. Maybe they can hire Nick
Or maybe they aren’t breaking anything and already know about it hey 😂😂
@@louloubelle1330 Clueless about what he's referencing I see
How ironic that a RUclips channel called 'Law and Crime' understands neither. Gutless pussies I believe.
Just to think his son Connor would be 20 now if this monster hadn’t killed them. How dare he.
@Law&Crime you should stop copyright trolling Nick and research fair use.
Law and crime sucks
2nd chance???? Dude is guilty af. He had no remorse! His actions convicted him
Striking a small channel like Reikita law? Very lame of you
I didn't even know this channel existed until I saw Reikta Law
L&C leave other creators in peace!
Justice for Nick!!! Cathy is a beard
Guys are big mad at Nick because he does this better than you, and it shows by comparing your viewers. I can't wait to watch this play out. Please keep trying to suppress him. Please. I'll grab some popcorn!
If they make a movie about this case, they should get Ben Affleck to play Scott.
Watch „Gone Girl“ 😉
Yes!
No doubt!
@@acason4 Plenty of doubt.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it
@@aok4418
When the first sentence “does it sound logical that a guy would dump his wife’s body in broad daylight” of your response is a logical fallacy I lose any ability to take anything that follows from that even remotely serious… 🤦🏼♂️
You’re a fallacy machine drowning in bad reasoning & cognitive dissonance. Please don’t respond with 3 more paragraphs because I didn’t read anything after your first sentence. You think you’re applying logic when you’re actually engaged in fallacious reasoning… 🤣
To sum it up for you: People have murdered people & hidden bodies in broad daylight. It’s not only possible, but probable & has happened countless times throughout the halls of history… 😉
Don't bully.
If Scott had been innocent, he would've told them about Amber immediately. For, if innocent, how did he know Amber wasn't involved?
Excellent point Reneenay
Yes good one Rene
Good point.
I have a question that I haven’t heard anyone else ask Scott Peterson. He took a shower, watched Martha Stewart and left to golf, without his wife aware he had changed his plans to go fishing. When he came home, he put his clothes in the washer…did he ever help with laundry before? Then took another shower? Why did he need another shower? What I’m watching is old and I’m not sure if he’s had another trial but, these are questions I would ask Scott and others close to the couple.
His whiney voice makes me sick.
Chris's watts and scott Peterson plus Chandler shld go share one cell and cuddle each other every night
People react in different ways she says.. Yeah but he was phoning his girlfriend saying he was in Paris whilst at his wife's missing vigil... Weirdo
@GA and saying to Amber that he lost his wife, while Lacie was still alive....
Ambers voice is just cringe. I don't believe for one second she didn't know he was married.
I recommend reading her moms book it was so sad.
Interestingly Lacis mum mentioned that when Laci was pregnant and one day walked a dog she felt unwell and had to sit on the ground in the park , Sharon said it happened just once to laci , she said that she had a suspicion that Scott tried to poison Laci ! That was interesting, maybe Scott tried to kill laci earlier that didn't work and then he found another way ...
Tape around Conner does not change or mean anything. He was underwater where there is so much debris and he is rolling in it...
Julia. What is wrong with people like you. You’re an apologist for a sociopathic murderer who told Amber he was in Paris while there was vigil for Lacy in his front yard.
@Julia agreed.
I know this guy probably did it but people don't know what beyond A reasonable doubt means. I've said it before and I'll say it again. men protect your wives and your family members because if someone murders them you will be going to prison for it if the police cannot solve the crime. they will go with the easiest closest explanation and that is you. you will have family members murdered and police will put you in prison for life with no evidence to make their jobs easier simply because they can't won't or are incapable of doing their job. or because the criminal was very good at his job.
there are cases where it has been physically impossible for the husband to commit the crime but he still convicted and sent to prison for life. protect those close to you men your life depends on it
I don't think YOU know what reasonable doubt means.
It's beyond a reasonable doubt, not beyond all doubt.
@@sophie8394 I very clearly do know the difference. If you had taken the time to read the first sentence of my comment you would understand that I was not specifically referring to this case. My comment was made more broadly about how police always go for the easy route to get the conviction. They will hone in on the easy target to keep the work load down.
There was even a case where a state police officer was convicted by his own Police department for murdering his family when he didn't do it and they ignored evidence and hid a confession after he was in prison for it.
You sir must be intellectually honest when having conversations with other people online. Don't ignore things just to try and make yourself sound better. Read everything someone says before commenting in order to avoid making yourself look so foolish
@@sophie8394 my comments is more about how juries don't understand what the burden of proof is or what beyond A reasonable doubt means. Even though they get the instructions they still simply don't understand these concepts.
Unfortunately juries are not made up of the most intelligent people.
Many Americans don't understand what logical fallacies are or how to reason properly with logic and evidence. This means that the majority of jurors are not the type of people any of us would want on that jury during our own trial especially if we're innocent.
I mean just look at Americans the majority of which are religious. Obviously they don't understand logical reasoning or evidence or the burden of proof.
@@Maintenance_Mark you're talking about this particular jury though right? Scott Peterson's jury? Do you really believe that 15 people weren't able to understand or reason properly?
@@sophie8394 no. The very first sentence says this guy probably did it. I was not speaking specifically about Scott Peterson's jury. I was speaking more broadly about jury's in general as my comment clearly states in the first line.
I appreciate the great content Nick is putting out roasting you fools. But it’s time to put on your big boy pants and move on.
Wait a min, the dog still had his leash on, no wife & not concerned? What!
That police interrogation video says everything. I honestly think they could have convinced a jury of his guilt with just that alone.
He seems so annoyed, uninterested, impatient, distracted, like he couldn't be any less interested in what was going on.
ya that’s what you convict on 🙄 no proof
What telling the truth in where he is and what he is doing he only lied about the affair
I hope you are never on a jury, if you believe that.
@@kennethwalls341 while Peterson was pretending to look for Laci on the night of Xmas Eve, he knocked on his neighbours door and told Amie K that he was "playing golf all day". Her flatmate overheard the conversation. See testimonials. Scott F'd UP his alibi from the get go.
@@mauraodonoghue4115 what proof is there of his innocence? Do tell.
*_Hacks_*
Beautiful Lacy is a shame. What happened to her and her unborn baby Conner
A 2nd chance at Sentencing 😳🤨 HE DEFINITELY DID ITTTT! Justice will be served when he meets his maker ‼️💯🤞🏽
God is fake
What evidence shows he did it? Murder weapon? Why, because he acted weird? Based on what behavior before that? If you didn't know him, how would you know he's acting weird? Unless you witness something or found the murder weapon... Please explain " Definitely did it"?
Then he will be guilty
@@tommyconnolly7749 Laci’s hair was in Scott’s tool. Plus a whole lot of circumstantial evidence. He did it and you know it.
@@D_Parks
Circumstantial evidence isn’t evidence
His actions speak loudly
What actions
@@mikebryant8507 Oh come on. Instead of listing the tons of circumstantial evidence that the whole world knows except you, how about you tell us how come you think he’s innocent.
@@D_Parks I don't think he's innocent. He's lied to many times
@@D_Parks the Scott lovers can't ever answer that question. They wet themselves and run away 🏃♂️
@@dannacamacho6569 Let's hope you are never in a jury.
He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
I saw a documentary that chronicled Scott and Lacy's courtship.
She really pursued him. Unfortunately the results weren't to good
@Godly Girlz
what's your point? are you blaming the victim ?
This jerk had ONLY 7 YEARS to get out of a marriage !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A lot of women do that, hence the phrase,
“He chased her until she caught him.”
The perfect alibi.... I'm going fishing hun! Lol
Hack frauds
I thought I knew this case inside and out. Today is the first time I realized the BABY had tape around his little face! WTF?
There was a piece of plastic tape or twine that was debris he got tangled in as he floated to shore.
Pretty hard to put tape around the baby's face when he was inside the womb !!!!
@@winner3924 or the twine that was wrapped around his neck and had knots
@@kennethwalls341 These people can't get past Amber long enough to see there is things about this case that needs to be looked at very closely. The cops, the judge , or the jury did a fair job on this case.
@@sophie8394 Testimony was given, from the criminologist and medical examiner, both State witnesses, to conclude that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. And NO, Kelp would not permanently fold and flatten his ear to the side of his head. Makes sense, since there was no evidence he ever washed ashore.
He ws found on land, above the high tide line and water break.
Testimony from Drs. March explains that Conner died between December 29 and January 3. Testimony from Dr. Galloway estimates Laci could have lived until January 14.
He only confessed to the mistress after he hit the news
Confessed to what?
Confessed that he said his wife had passed away before she went missing
Confessed that he was married
@@christinafan4476 He said he lost his wife. He made it up because he was confronted with Amber's friend and she knew he was married. She told him he has to tell Amber or she would. So he made that up. He used the excuse that his wife had passed, and he could then use his traveling work as an alibi as to why he'd be gone most of the time.
It's not uncommon for someone cheating to lie. Telling the truth to Amber wouldn't be a priority. The same women we know for a fact he lied to over and over again. He cheated and lied, but there is no evidence he killed anyone.
@@jwait1496 Scott also said it would be the first holidays without his wife. Then his wife magically vanishes and turns up where he was fake fishing.
Peterson did imply his wife was dead when he told Amber she was lost because in recorded phone calls with his GF - he suddenly announced "she's ALIVE".
Laci was alive when Scott said she was LOST and dead by the time he pretended she was ALIVE! Lying, manipulative, untrustworthy, cowardly SOB MURDERER!!!!
See...THIS is content that you can trademark. Even then it is subject to fair use by other entities.
Nicks nose says you guys are attacking your own.
Why does everyone make such a big deal about him being away from her cause she is pregnant? So what if she was expecting a baby. Its not like she was over her due date. The robbery being on the 24 changes everything in my opinion. I believe those guys knew Scot wasn't going to be home. I wonder if he told Amber he was going fishing or not going to be home?
So true. The police were all to happy to keep the truth from the public to pursue the husband who clearly had nothing to do with it.
You're both trippin 🤪
😆 🤣 😂
@@laneybobs8157 Both accounts are yours, Sophie. Get a life!
Because if he's not an avid fisherman, doesn't know anything about sturgeon fishing, has to pick up a gift basket, due to go to a Christmas Eve family gathering, he's not going to go 90 miles away and back just to go "fishing" at the drop of a hat.
Ffs still I am sick to death of this case he did it he should rot in prison....that's it ..omg again so sorry again to laci family.....diabolical...
Amen
Take your meds and go to bed.
@@kathyb9390 STFU! Why don't tell us all the evidence that proves his innocence? Do tell 😆
@@kathyb9390 crickets...
@@laneybobs8157 Janey is such a troll.
By the way I would never play golf in the freezing cold the ball doesn’t travel a long ways but I would go ice fishing And of course the body was found there because the people who murdered the other seven women within an hour radius and within a year they’re the ones and put it there everyone knew where she went in supposedly
Riiiiiight 👌🥴🤣
Bless moms n children 👶 victims😩😢
No second chance for you Scott 🤣🤣🤣
Wait, I thought the neighbor found the dog - I just watched the interview where she described finding him in the front yard, the gate was open, and she puts him in the back yard and closes the gate.
Don’t forget the mailman who blew her out of the water…
A half hour later, the mailman came by the house and found the gate open and the dog gone. Laci took the dog for a walk, while Scott was at work.
@@Milkman4279 sure 👌🥴🤣
@@calebvalesko36 "blew her out of the water"???
His lack of emotions n the mistress’s confession nailed him
-Scott emotional
: Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right?
GRANTSKI: Yes, I had.
GERAGOS: On more than one occasion?
GRANTSKI: Yes.
GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that?
GRANTSKI: That's true.
.
.GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer?
GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing?
GRANTSKI: Yeah.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said,
GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing.
Officer Spurlock:
Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern.
…
Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you?
Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so.
Officer Evers:
Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct?
Officer Evers: Yes, I do.
Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct?
Officer Evers: Yes.
Detective Grogan:
Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before?
Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes.
Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct?
Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says.
Amie Krigbaum (neighbor):
Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay.
Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know?
Greg Reed (Scott’s friend):
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message?
Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic.
Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend):
Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time?
Stacey Boyers: 5:26.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records?
Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes.
Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just,
Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset?
Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes.
Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend):
Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes.
Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he?
Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
His excitement while speaking to his girlfriend whilst at the park for Laci's vigil nailed him IMO. He couldn't have cared less!! Murdering SOB.
@@laneybobs8157 Still stalking me, Renee Pigeon.
@@jwait1496 Hi Mr P! 👋 I'm correcting your mistakes. You're welcome!
@@laneybobs8157 Hi Renee Pigeon.
Good luck with that. You are are obviously immune to failure
Peterson's defence lawyer makes a strong argument we all handle traumatising situations in different ways - there's no one way to react. Peterson's manages to be fairly emotional when he is charged though, weightloss and nerve racked. My, what a change from the stoic reaction to his wife's disappearance. All the evidence was circumstantial, but that doesn't mean it was any weaker than direct evidence. The jury, as odd as they were, made the right verdict.
The mistress betrayed him to save her own skin she could be his future victim
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Christina Fan, I completely agree. Amber dodged a bullet.
@@jwait1496hi janey.
I didn't know about the Baby condition with duct tape..wow my heart 💔 broke
There was no duct tape on the baby 🙄 It was determined by the forensic pathologist who performed the autopsies to be kelp bc of the iodine stain left behind on the skin.
It wasn’t determined by the pathologist to be kelp. He testified that he “thought” it was kelp. At the preliminary hearing he didn’t even remember taking anything off of Conner’s ear…
Too bad that item was thrown in the garbage. 😮
also, remember scott predict Laci death on Dec 9th to Amber.
GUILTY!
Scott should have been put to sleep by now! Why do death row inmates get such a long time living on?
The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it.
@@aok4418 go back to bed and keep dreaming.
Lack of remorse at the time ,is 100% acknowledgement of the crime.
Remorse inolves regret or guilt for a wrong committed. I'm sure he has guilt for the affair and cheating, but I foubt he's going go face remorse for killer her since the first point to him, having don't it.
What are the odds Conner was alive no less than 6 days after her disappearance, and Scott did it.
What are the odds he managed to kill her, get her body from the home to the warehouse, to the boat to the marina while he left his boat unattended in the marina, and nobody heard, or seen a thing.
What are the odds he did this without leaving a shred of physical or forensic evidence in the home, truck, boat, or warehouse? Where is the evidence?
What are the odds 32 lbs would submerge a 153 lb woman wrapped in a tarp?
What are the odds, 52 searches of the bay using every possible police agency, coast guard, navy, sonar, FBI divers, etc see either a her floating in the bay or one of 4 alleged anchors in roughly 4 feet of water?
During Peterson's first interview with the cop on the night of Xmas Eve, Scott spoke of Laci in he PAST TENSE and I quote " she WAS pretty fastidious". WAS! He knew she was dead already because he killed her. Then while waiting at the park at Laci's vigil, Scott called his GF and spoke to her in an excitable tone. LAUGHING. HAPPY. There was no regret or guilt shown because Peterson is a psychopath!
@@laneybobs8157 Yet, even detective Grogan testifies that nearly everyone including her own family spoke about her in past tense.
Try reading testimony. It's really informative.
@@jwait1496 NOT WITHIN HOURS OF LACI BEING REPORTED MISSING! ONLY PETERSON DID! HE KNEW SHE WAS DEAD BECAUSE HE KILLING HER!!!
@@laneybobs8157 Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend):
Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time?
Stacey Boyers: 5:26.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records?
Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes.
Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just,
Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset?
Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes.
Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend):
Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes.
Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he?
Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
You want more examples. . .
Ask about the watch, Deanna Renfro connection, what about...the Chino connection...all the witnesses that saw her prior to returning home...seeing the burglary and becoming a victim of kidnapping.
The watch that was pawned was not Laci's. This has already been proven. Try to keep up. No witnesses saw her and no one witnessed a burglary 🙄
They were on to him within seconds
Seriously the guy is guilty. He lied to Laci, to Amber, to the cops, to his parents, to her parents was running to Mx, on a boat exactly where she was found, I mean please!
HE DID WATCH THE MARTHA STEWART SHOW THAT MORNING BUT LACI DIDNT AS SHE WAS ALREADY DEAD BY THAT MORNING NOT A TEAR FROM SCOTT NOT ONE SCOTT NEVER REALLY LOVED LACI HE WANTED OUT OF THIS MARRIAGE BUT THEN LACI BECAME PREGNANT THEN HE FELT EVEN MORE TRAPPED IM SURE ANYONE WOULD CHOOSE BREAKING UP WITH SOMEONE OVER BÈING STRANGLED TO DEAD THANK YOU LINDA
RIP LACI AND BABY CONNOR❤
He’s a coldblooded narcissist only loves himself n treats women as objects
No new trial only sentence.
I remember when he tried to flee. He died his hair and tried to leave for Mexico with a bunch of money. Yes, he was convicted with circumstantial evidence but their was a mountain of it. I didn't agree with him getting the death penalty.
The jurors said location location location...the very same place he was fishing was the same place the bodies washed up on shore ...telling factor for me though, and there were many, the baby's room was turned into a junk room. Why would you do that if you were expecting wife and baby to come home?
@@soniadowney7427 Of course it's the location of where the bodies were that he was convicted, and the idea someone framed him is preposterous.
@@soniadowney7427 Except he didn't try to flee. He was driving North on his way to meet his two brothers and father art Torrey Pines. The defense played the wire tapped recording from police where Scott specifically told John his brother that it's best he didn't play golf because the media were following him, and he didn't want another picture of him in the papers.
He dyed his hair to avoid the media. Police already seen him with his dyed hair and goatee.
@@heatherbarter1385 There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
@@soniadowney7427 The baby's room had a couple of office chairs and some bedding. It wasn't a junk room. He stored some items from his warehouse that he no longer had and didn't fit into the storage unit. Those things were stored in their home.
A futon sofa and three office chairs. The futon sofa ended up in their second bedroom and the office chairs ended up in the nursery. The mattresses from the second bedroom have been propped up in front of the window, blocking the view of on-lookers into the house.
Flat affect like watts
He should just have gotten a divorce
Είχε κρύο και δεν πήγε για Γκολφ αλλά πήγε για Ψάρεμα. 🤪😱🤣🤣🤣
I think he maybe guilty of more… I kinda think they caught a serial killer because wasn’t there another woman found the same way his wife was just before his wife went missing? Has there been any other victims found in similar way since his suspected involvement with the disappearance and murder of wife and unborn son?
either way, there were no forensics.....on his wifes case....to tie him, to the murder...
There was another pregnant woman found on the bay but was never connected to SP. I think you are reaching a little bit.
@@kathyb9390 Maybe but I still think he did a trial run before his wife … maybe not quite a serial killer.
@@kathyb9390 you funny funny lady 🤣… calling me bitter and vicious and then assuming I’m married and to a cheater no less. Calm down ! There’s no reason to get angry and vicious towards me 🙄. It’s okay for me to think differently than you and to form different opinions . That doesn’t mean I’m bitter or vicious but you calling me those thing and then further assuming I’m married to a cheater is a form of bullying so please stop 🛑
@@kathyb9390 stop 🛑 bullying me please
I am not saying he's innocent but he does deserve a second trial. It would be great if it was trial by a judge. Back then it was a circus with ppl judging on emotions and not evidence. I hate it when ppl assume how a person SHOULD act & react. If I'm ever pulled in for something in surely going down if I'm going to be judged on my emotional reactions. Plenty of reasonable doubt was evident IMO
He doesn't deserve another trial. The SCOC upheld his guilty conviction and affirmed the fairness of his trial in 2020.
Oh brother, you're lost for sure. He's not getting another trial. Wake up from your coma. Who gives a rats behind what you would do? There was not a shred of reasonable doubt in this case@! Embarrassing as you obviously missed the case.
@Jessie Scanlon Wow, is that sentence drop out? Scott won't you like no man would. Even the killer has standards you don't stand up to. No wonder you can't get on a Friday night. I win.
@Jessie Scanlon What is wrong with me is emotional people like you sitting on juries. My opinion of him needing a new trial was not at all based on any proclamation of innocence. Justice can only truly be served if it's granted uniformly...everyone has a right to a fair trial. What's the worst that can happen with a new trial? So if all the actual evidence proved he's so obviously guilty, what are you so worried about?
@@Chauna30 I agree.
I know it wasn't many cases back then to even trigger the idea of it. But there have now been plenty if cases of ppl abducting pregnant women to seize the infant and the entire thing go wrong with death of baby as well. It also doesn't help that it so publicized where Scott was when she went missing. Idk if hes innocent or not but I do not think he was fairly sentenced by a fair jury using any scent of real evidence.
I Live 5 mins away from the old petersons house it’s currently for sale right now super nice house
I want one of you people that think he's innocent, to explain how Lacys hair ended up on one of his tools.
I really think that some people needs consperisieteories.......
Well they where married. Obviously there will be hairs from both all over the place.
They loved in the same house...so there you go
The brand new boat had cement residue...the blue tarp had the same cement residue...he was making anchors for sure, rolled her up in the tarp and dumped her overboard
@@MrDIAMONDCOR clamped in a pair of pliers in the bottom of a boat she knew nothing about? Sure 👌🥴
Peterson is guilty. No doubt.
The 911 operator sounds so bored and even rude.
Sounds like same thing that happened in Maxwell case. Hmm how many other high profile cases has this happened? Plants??
Chris watts..Dave tronnes...idk how these young ladies even get with these guys..these evens don't happen overnight.there always signs
Back in 2007, i read this book about this case,( Totally by accident) It was written by Geragos, Scotts famous defense attorney, so i proceeded to read it, i was struck by how much it made sense.. The idea of the " other" killers is absolutely plausible...you have to read it too understand....
What was the name of the book?
@@sophie8394 PRESUMED GUILTY: WHAT THE JURY NEVER KNEW ABOUT LACI PETERSONS MURDER...thats the name if it!!!
@@letsexchangecansandbadadvi4245 ya. That wasn't Mark Geragos. It was Matt Dalton. He got fired by Geragos bc he's a lunatic.
@@sophie8394 written with Geragos...look again
Have you been dropped on your head? Garagos did not write a book. NO there are no other kills. What case did you follow? Not this one. Sit down.
Scott didn't fish. He want out for 35 mins, had no pole, no lures nor any bait. He had no idea what he was fake fishing for.
That's a lie.
Brocchini: Did you buy bait?
Scott: Nope, I'm not a bait fisherman.
Brocchini: Did you troll?
Scott: Little bit. I mean a lot of, lot of the reason I went was just to get that boat in the water to see, you know ---
A lot of the reason I went was just to get that boat in the water . . . this says it all. Did the public hear this explanation? No, not until the National Enquirer published Brocchini's transcript. And, even then, it was surrounded with claims, citing LE sources, that Scott murdered Laci and Conner.
Did Scott have fishing gear with him on that fishing trip?
Yes, he did. But, we didn't find that out until the Preliminary Hearing. All the months before, we were encouraged, by the LE, to believe that Scott didn't. Even in the Prelim, LE attempted to diminish the real evidence by repeatedly emphasizing the unopened pack of lures.
Brocchini testified that Scott had, in the boat, 2 fishing rods and a small tackle box which contained old fishing jigs and lures. The boat came equipped with a fish finder and a small trolling motor. So, Scott had everything with him necessary to troll fish, which is what he said he was doing.
2 fishing rods and a small tackle box which contained old fishing jigs and lures. The boat came equipped with a fish finder and a small trolling motor.
Yes he had 2 poles , lures and other artificial bait. Stop throwing 💩 around when you obviously don't know what you are talking about
Cops found two unopened packages of lures in Peterson's pickup. When the cop asked him what type of fish, he was fishing for, Peterson didn't know! See testimonials.
The swells of SF Bay are not suitable for an aluminium boat. Yet Peterson drove past approx 7 waterways much closer to home. Claimed it was a "spur of the moment" decision because it was "too cold to play golf". LMAO...only idiots believe his BS.
@@laneybobs8157 McALLISTER: And so -- and did you take -- you looked inside that, obviously; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes. I opened it.
McALLISTER: And that's how you were able to make the description I just read of the fishing jigs and lures; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
By the way I would never play golf in the freezing cold the ball doesn’t travel a long ways but I would go ice fishing
Exactly right
There’s definitely some lingering questions regarding the prosecutions case & specifically the “how”, but with that said there are a few things that just cannot be explained away:
1. The body being found in the exact same body of water he was fishing in that morning. The odds of this??? 🤷🏼♂️
2. The dogs tracking Lacy’s scent to the marina where Scott docked his boat. Again, applying Occam’s Razor… 🤷🏼♂️
3. Him claiming (to his mistress mind you) that he’d “lost his wife” prior to her actual disappearance.
4. His lack of remorse & general demeanor prior to arrest & during the trial when they showed explicit photos of his deceased wife & child.
These are 4 incredibly damning points that just don’t seem to have reasonable refutation.
Actually, they are not.
1.the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. And 52 searches of the bay revealed nothing.
2. The dogs didn't track Laci's scent, if they tracked anything it was Scott's scent.
-TRIMBLE was selected using Scott's sunglasses that Scott handled. Trimble was never CARDA certified.
-Seitz, whose dog was Ron Seitz, whose dog was certified by CARDA didn't pick up Laci's scent at the Marina. And they scented her with Laci's slipper that wasn't handled by Scott.
-Expert
Trimble was not following Mr.
Peterson’s scent, rather than Laci’s scent, as he drove the boat out of the
marina. (Id. at HCP-000040-41.)
C. Third,Mr.Rebmann noted that there was a four-day delay
between December 24, when Laci’s body was supposedly at the marina.
3. He used the excuse that so he could then use his traveling work as an alibi as to why he'd be gone most of the time. Why do you think he told Amber he wouldn't be around over the holidays? He knew he would be spending it with his family.
4. Demeanor
: Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right?
GRANTSKI: Yes, I had.
GERAGOS: On more than one occasion?
GRANTSKI: Yes.
GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that?
GRANTSKI: That's true.
.
.GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer?
GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing?
GRANTSKI: Yeah.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said,
GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing.
Officer Spurlock:
Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern.
…
Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you?
Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so.
Officer Evers:
Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct?
Officer Evers: Yes, I do.
Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct?
Officer Evers: Yes.
Detective Grogan:
Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before?
Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes.
Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct?
Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says.
Amie Krigbaum (neighbor):
Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay.
Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know?
Greg Reed (Scott’s friend):
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message?
Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic.
Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend):
Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time?
Stacey Boyers: 5:26.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records?
Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes.
Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just,
Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset?
Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes.
Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend):
Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes.
Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he?
Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
Peterson knew it would be the first Xmas without his wife eventhough Laci was still ALIVE at that time.
Peterson went fishing because it was too cold to play golf.
Claimed fishing was a spur of the moment decision. Yet have already purchased a two day fishing license on Dec 20th.
Told his neighbour he was playing golf all day when he knocked on her door pretending to look for his wife.
Spoke of Laci in PAST TENSE during first recorded interview on night of Xmas Eve.
Couldn't recall type of fish he was fishing for when asked by cop.
Cops found two unopened packages of lures in his truck.
Called his GF while waiting for Laci's vigil to start. Laughing. Happy. Excitable.
Continued to call Amber, post Laci's disappearance.
Lied to Police.
Lied to the Media.
Showed no emotion when told bodies were that of his wife and son.
The list goes on and on... GUILTY!
@@laneybobs8157 Do you honestly think the guy is going tell intentionally lie to one person when cell phone records for multiple calls made from points near the Berkeley Marina,
Three eye-witnesses, A timed receipt from the Berkeley etc. A recorded message etc says otherwise. 🤦♂️.
So one minute he's a genius and commits the perfect murder without leaving a shred of physical evidence anywhere, nobody sees or hears him committing this crime, but you believe he was leading people to think he was golfing.
You have to be one of the most unintelligent people I've ever encountered.
@@laneybobs8157
GERAGOS: Mr. Browne, the, if I understand correctly, you didn't have one-year licenses in December of 2002?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: So it doesn't matter how much it cost, you couldn't buy one? From Big 5, at least?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: You had to buy the two-day license?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: And the two-day license is, this item that we have here, and even though it says 2003, it really was for 2002, correct?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you're saying that whoever this Christmas help was, Kristin or Kate or whatever her name was, she would be the one who would fill this information in?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. Do you know, do you recognize the handwriting?
BROWNE: No, I don't.
GERAGOS: So you don't know who filled this in, correct?
BROWNE: No, I don't.
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, on the back there is a 2003 Ocean Enhancement Sport Fishing stamp; is that correct?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. And is the 2003 sport, Ocean e 25 Enhancement Sport Fishing stamp, which is invalid after December 31st, 2003, was that also purchased at Big 5 that day?
BROWNE: Yes. It looks like it was, yes.
GERAGOS: Ah-hah. That would be right there?
BROWNE: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. Two-day fishing license right there?
BROWNE: Correct.
@@laneybobs8157 Evers heard Spurlock ask Scott, "What were you fishing for in the Bay Area?" When pressed by McAllister, Evers admits that Scott did answer Spurlock, but he, Evers, "didn't hear exactly what response was."
I agree Nick did nothing wrong
He has no emotions grief or worry over his pregnant wife’s disappearance
Wrong
: Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right?
GRANTSKI: Yes, I had.
GERAGOS: On more than one occasion?
GRANTSKI: Yes.
GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that?
GRANTSKI: That's true.
.
.GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer?
GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing?
GRANTSKI: Yeah.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said,
GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing.
Officer Spurlock:
Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern.
…
Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you?
Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so.
Officer Evers:
Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct?
Officer Evers: Yes, I do.
Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct?
Officer Evers: That's correct.
Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct?
Officer Evers: Yes.
Detective Grogan:
Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"?
Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before.
Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before?
Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes.
Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct?
Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says.
Amie Krigbaum (neighbor):
Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay.
Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know?
Greg Reed (Scott’s friend):
Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message?
Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic.
Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend):
Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time?
Stacey Boyers: 5:26.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records?
Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes.
Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just,
Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no.
Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset?
Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes.
Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend):
Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes.
Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he?
Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe
In the philippines adultery is a crime punishable by serving jail time
How did tape get around parts of the baby’s body
I thought the baby came out while laci was in the water because of decomp so the baby was unborn yet the tape interesting
Trash in bay
Duct tape on laci and when expelled - transferred to baby.
@@janine5540 yes who knows when floating in a bay with fishing boats snd trash
It wasn't tape. It was determined by the forensic pathologist who performed the autopsies to be kelp bc of the iodine stain left behind on the skin.
@@sophie8394 that makes even more sense
A question for all of the Peterson supporters...
Explain the boat cover, soaked with gasoline, in Scott's shed. Why would the boat cover that he used on the 24th be at his house when the boat was never at the house? Why was it under a leaf blower that hadn't been used for days with the gas cap off? Haven't come across anyone who can explain that.
Nothing huh? That's what I thought 🦗
@@sophie8394 They are idiots who have no answers.
@@VideoFanatic02 I guess the burglars must have put it there. Part of their diabolical plan to frame Scott. They must have also had a key bc the shed was locked.
🙄
🤣🤣🤣
I also have a list of questions for Scott 😅✌️that the detectives haven’t yet questioned it.
Still didn't show any evidence on it lol and it wouldn't get rid of evidence
Dislike
Massage therapist, what a joke.
I was never fully convinced he was guilty
Lol
Why?
Because you lack education or forethought?
His interview alone proves him guilty. A real sociopath not giving a hoot. Notice he never mentions Conner's name ever.
Why are you saying Scott "had no pole, no lures nor bait,"
Brocchini testified that Scott had, in the boat, 2 fishing rods and a small tackle box which contained old fishing jigs and lures. The boat came equipped with a fish finder and a small trolling motor. So, Scott had everything with him necessary to troll fish, which is what he said he was doing.
"Miss the case much"
Here ya go.
McALLISTER: Okay. Now, in your report then, you did detail what was in the boat as you saw it on 12/24; is that correct?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: And you reported in your report -- I'm talking about 7 of 12 of that same date of 12/24 -- that you inspected the inside of the boat?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: And saw that there were two fishing poles. One was an ultralight-type stream fishing pole, and second was a heavier type fishing pole; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: Now, what is an "ultralight-type stream fishing pole"?
BROCCHINI: It's short, very lightweight, doesn't come apart, and it's -- that's what I call it. That's the type of fishing pole I would use, so --
McALLISTER: Okay. My next question. Do you know something about fishing?
BROCCHINI: A little bit. Not about ocean fishing, but I fly fish and stream fish.
McALLISTER: So to give us that description, were you close enough to be able to see like a brand name on that fishing pole?
BROCCHINI: No. I didn't look for one.
McALLISTER: Okay. Is this a generic type description just from your knowledge of fishing?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: But you were close enough to see it in that detail from where you were standing; right?
BROCCHINI: Yeah.
McALLISTER: Then there was a small plastic tackle box which contained old fishing jigs and lures. Now, is that shown on the photographs?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: Could you show us -- could you show me where that is? Would that be that?
BROCCHINI: On photo 92, that would be it.
McALLISTER: Okay. And that is a -- looks like at some earlier part of its life might have been an orange hinged box?
BROCCHINI: That's right.
McALLISTER: And that would be next to what we described as the anchor?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: And so -- and did you take -- you looked inside that, obviously; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes. I opened it.
McALLISTER: And that's how you were able to make the description I just read of the fishing jigs and lures; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: Now, then you also described a six-foot red rope, possibly used to tie the boat to a dock and a pair of yellowish rubber gloves. I think the gloves show in those pictures, too, don't they?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: Okay. Those are near the fishing poles, kind of under them almost?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
McALLISTER: Right?
BROCCHINI: Uh-huh.
McALLISTER: And what was this other thing under the fishing poles?
BROCCHINI: That is something to -- if you get a flat tire on your trailer, you pull your trailer up onto that, and then you can take your tire off and change it.
McALLISTER: Oh, okay. And then reading on, you said that the ropes and gloves were wet; is that --
BROCCHINI: That's correct.
@@jwait1496 two unopened packages of lures found in Peterson's truck on Xmas Eve.
@@laneybobs8157What's your point? He said he forgot them in his truck, so he used an older lure from his tackle box.
Don't waste my time.
@@laneybobs8157 McALLISTER: And so -- and did you take -- you looked inside that, obviously; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes. I opened it.
McALLISTER: And that's how you were able to make the description I just read of the fishing jigs and lures; right?
BROCCHINI: Yes.
Try harder!
Frey story is a bit suspect she liked the stage and the jurors were also suspicious… such a shame Laci was taken and justice I hope gets served
Justice was served 19 yrs ago.
@@sophie8394 I’m sure it was but some sketchy stuff with some of those ppl
@@NH-7 like what?
Jurors were very bias from the start and no actual physical evidence… I’m not saying he’s innocent I’m just saying from a legal standpoint … plus that redhead lied to get on the jury .. it could open doors all I’m saying
@@NH-7how do you know the jurors were biased?
Laci's hair clamped in a pair of pliers in the bottom of a boat she knew nothing about, evidence that multiple concrete anchors were made in the warehouse but only one was found in Peterson's boat with no rope attached, the gas soaked boat cover found stuffed in Peterson's shed with chunks of concrete rolled up in it, researching the currents in the SFB on the home computer - all examples of physical evidence.
The "red head" you mentioned, Richelle Nice didn't lie to get on the jury. That feeble attempt was shot down a year ago and that door is closed.
Reminds me of the case Daniel Holtzclaw wrongly convicted no evidence
WOW, what a mess due to a dishonest juror. Now here we go again. Well, if he is not Guilty good for him. If he is found Guilty !!!
Watch his facial expression 🤪😥😫
you touched or what? He as found guilty and no there was no dishonest juror.
@@kmremseysmith4771 Oh yes there was. Her name is Richele Nice and she has invoked the 5th. I wonder why.
@@kathyb9390 SHE DID NOT. Are you deaf? She at no point pleaded the 5th. Listen to the testimony.
@@kmremseysmith4771 It came out in the news a couple days ago. She IS pleading the 5th. She knows she lied and now she is trying to cover her a$$. If you watch her after the verdict......It is obvious she is a very spiteful vindictive person. No I'm not deaf. I know what I heard. You must be a liberal that wants to silence me. I am a KAREN and I will not be silenced. I would love for the entire jury to be investigated. I did not like this woman's actions while the trial was going on. You could tell she had her own agenda here. SHE DID PLEAD THE 5th. LMFAO
@@kmremseysmith4771 Excuse me... She only threatened to invoke the 5th until she was granted immunity from self incrimination. Says a lot about her character. That trial was riddled with lies and SP was not the only person lying.
If he gets a new trial he will be convicted again, it wasn't the affair that led me to believe his guilty but his actions, dying his hair which led me to believe he was trying to escape. If your wife is still 'missing' why change your look from the last time she saw you.
And the 10 grand and brother's license
15k, credit cards that didn't belong to him, his brother's drivers license, 4 cell phones, knives, rope, duct tape, shovel, a map to American Bodyworks (Amber's workplace) camping equipment, a water purifier, weeks worth of clothing and shoes and viagra. But ya, he was going to meet his family to play golf...with no clubs or shoes 🙄
@@sophie8394 You need to get a life. OR better yet , another husband. The one you have seems to have made you very bitter.🤣
He dyed his hair to avoid the media. No he was not fleeing.
Scott's appearance changed between December 24, 2002 and April 18, 2003. He'd lost over 20 pounds, grown a goatee and his hair was lighter. None of these changes took place overnight, or made him unrecognizable. Scott's picture had been plastered all over the media, and slow motion video of him was being shown on TV with creepy music in the back ground. Scott had become a recognizable figure. The goatee and hair color may have helped Scott avoid being recognized by media or someone on the street, but he was not trying to use these changes to hide from the police.
There was constant traffic driving by their home, media was camped out there, their home had been stripped of many items during the search warrants (none of which had any evidentiary value), radio DJs called out to him with bullhorns while airing their show live from in front of his house, his house had been broken into, and the volunteer center had shut down. So he was living essentially out his car and with family and friends in Southern California.
The defense played the wire tapped recording from police where Scott specifically told John his brother that it's best he didn't play golf because the media were follieing him, and he didn't want another picture of him in the papers.
@@sophie8394 Sitting on the passenger seat of the car, was the address (not directions) to Amber’s office. And with it, the book, The Purpose Driven Life , that Amber had sent Scott. As Amber had requested, he was going to mail back her book.
Law and Crime just mad cuz Nick provides worthwhile content while you hardly scrape together any viewers. Unsubbed from this garbage page.
Mistress coming forward provided a motive for the murder
I hope he gets a new trial
@Jessie Scanlon You mean informed and rational.
Never gonna happen.
@@sophie8394 Are you still stalking me Renee Pigeon?
I can't even imagine how sad your life must be to continue resorting to this childish behavior. Trolling RUclips under dozens of names pretending to be one person, while maliciously spreading misinformation and twisting facts is about all you are any good for.
Maliciously spreading misinformation and twisting facts. If the evidence is so solid, then why are you so set on being so misleading?
"Megan Volpe"
"VideoFanatic02"
"Reneenay FabNayNay"
"Mia Gardner"
"Laney Bobs"
"Jay Taylor"
"Ginger Clove"
"Rustys crib"
"Hockey lover"
"Pan Rules all"
"Billy"
"Evelyne"
"Norma Stone"
"Shadow babe"
"Sophie"
"Twills"
"Ginger Harris"
"Chee chalker"
"Tippy Canoe"
"Trailrunner925"
@@sophie8394 and now, a year later, he lost his appeal! No new trial! Yayyy!
This is a case where no one got justice except Lacy's mother who became bent when she found out Scott had cheated on her perfect daughter and took the fact that Scott had done that as a personal affront. The minute she found out Scott had been cheated she was in overdrive to make sure he was convicted because he had cheated whether or not he was innocent or guilty. The Lord could have appeared in court and testified as to Scott not being the one who murdered Lacy and her mother would have still demanded, cajoled, and threatened the jury into a dearth sentence. It's not that she tampered with the jury once it was picked but she had been tampering with the people in Redwood City before a jury was even chosen and had most convinced that if he cheated he must have done worse but even if not he deserved to be convicted due to this woman's grief and embarrassment that her daughter was cheated on.
Scott probably is guilty but let's hear that evidence that proves that. Not have his conviction based mainly on the salacious details of his relationship with another woman who was not her fault either. There has never been a death penalty handed down for a husband caught cheating. It took long enough for them to investigate one tampered jurer, not that evidence or knowledge of it is hard to learn but the prosecution and the state realizes they got a conviction based on infidelity and a furious mother riding a high horse, as they never had any evidence of where she was killed or that Scott had body in his vehicle or boat, or even her live body willingly going fishing. The main connection is that he said he went fishing in the bay and later the bodies turned up in the bay but it's a really big bay and not hard for anyone to find. I am afraid a new trial without her mother bearing the pavement and knocking on doors might get them a fair jury a second time around and they would not have the proof to show a jury that he was in fact guilty by law.
There was a mountain of evidence that put this wife and baby killer away. How dare you talk about Sharon Rocha that way. Despicable.
@@sophie8394 Idk about jury tampering that sounds.
Like a stretch to me. But the family was defending him to the core when police suspected him until they found out about Amber. Then it became tunnel vision. Idk if he’s guilty or not. He probably is. But Amber was a huge reason he got convicted
@@JEM471025 Laci's family suspected Scott's involvement within the first week. Long before they found out about Amber. Amber's testimony and those recorded phone calls were very damaging but he would have been convicted without that evidence.
@@sophie8394 I guess I'm despicable to because there is just something about Sharon Rocha that rubs me the wrong way. She should have been more concerned with who killed her daughter and less angry about the fact that SP cheated on her daughter. I don't believe there has been any justice for Laci and Conner. I could care less about SP. There are many men like him all over the world. He cheated and got caught. I also believe Amber knew he was married. A mutual friend set them up. I find it hard to believe that friend didn't tell Amber that he was married. There is a lot of sketchy stuff with this case. All of the facts in this case have not come to light yet.
@@kathyb9390 yep. You are.
The facts are out. You just seem to have missed them.