When you went through 5 lectures and 3 discussions and still have no clue what the three laws are exactly, and a RUclips video can explain it clearly in less than 20 minutes. You really start questioning our country's education system...
I keep hearing different versions of this, the reason why you find RUclips videos simpler is most likely because you're simply paying more attention or because you have the ability to pause a video. If you have actually gone through 5 lectures and still didn't understand it, you might just be a dumbass.
i think my brain just melted out through my ears - I can't fathom how you guys' brains just work like this. I have a huge respect towards all scientists but especially the ones dealing with mathematics . It truly is a talent you have to be born with, to see numbers in such a complex way and understand immediately. It takes me a long time to GET IT. Thank you for this video, it did help a lot!!
Imagine those times no schools, libraries, printing presses etc.. All these discoveries were interdependent.. how they had access to each others discoveries..who documented it?
This is soo cool! I love the interactive way of learning. Thank you thank you! I have watched so many videos and only this one has really made sense to me.
@@untitiled1092 well, I needed it sooo i can say that it's fine since you don't know who'll be watching this video. Some might find history useful and for some might not.
Nice video and presentation. Page 6:37 depicts sun and a second planet acts as one focal points. What happens if the second planet is located outside Earth’s orbit? What kind of elliptic orbit the earth may have?
What's fascinating about Kepler is that his belief in a God that created a perfect and ordered universe is what spurred him on to create a more accurate model for revolutions. The math is quite something!
Thank you so much! I had to study Johannes Kepler for a school project and all other videos and websites were really confusing. You did such a good job explaining and simplifying Kepler's three laws. I would love to hear more from you!
Great explanations. You are much better than my classroom teacher. But I suppose Kepler's law of period r^3/t^2=GM/4^2 would only work when the object revolving around a central mass in a circular motion. However, from the video, the eccentricity of mercury is 0.206, which should be large enough for its motion to be considered as elliptical. So my question is can you actually derive a equation that describe such an elliptical motion.
To derive what R^3/T^2 equal to, you applied v= 2pi/r which is a formula for circle, and you applied the formula for uniform circular motion F= mv^2/r. Well, then the left hand side of Kepler's third law is for an ellipse, but the right hand side is derived using properties of circles. At least to me, it should not work with ellipse.
Thank you for your beautiful explanations. How is it that Kepler was correct in his calculations despite his belief 18:39 that the earth is the centre of the planetary system when the sun is. Ramzi
Fact: over a 15-year period (of 5495 days) Mars returns facing a given star in this curious sequence of time intervals: 707 + 707 + 707 +707 + 707 +707+ 707 + 546 days. As expounded and illustrated in Chapter 5 of my new TYCHOS book (2nd Edition / Dec 2023), this means that the geoheliocentric model devised by Tycho Brahe is the only possible configuration of our Solar System. This, because the 'odd behavior' of Mars - what with its "short Empiric Sidereal Interval" of only 546 days is - perfectly accounted for in Brahe's model. It is now high time to realize this undeniable fact - and to expose Kepler's fraudulent ways in his vain quest to validate heliocentrism (as already discovered and denounced by Prof. W.H. Donahue - the American translator of Kepler's "Astronomia Nova" - back in 1988).
This needs a longer response but in essence Ptolemaic model was geocentric the others heliocentric. Copernican model was circular where as Kepler demonstrated it was elliptical.
Actually Kleplers‘s law is derived on ellipses where “r” is the semi major axis. A circle is simply and an ellipse where the semimajor axis and the semi minor axis are the same size.
Not sure what you are asking. A object in an elliptical orbit will have a variable speed, faster when it’s closer. Kepler describes this but could explain it. It took Newton to explain with Gravitation
On Keplers third law with the radius, how do you measure radius of an ellipse since it's constantly changing? Do you take the average radius across a single revolution or does it not matter and can you just take the radius at any point in the ellipse?
Skipped over some of the explanation of the formulas in 3rd law proofing. If you are going to explain it, please do it completely, step by step, without holes. Thanks.
Good question The actual Keller’s law refers to the half the semi major axis. With a circle it’s the radius with an ellipse it’s half the greater diameter. Since most orbits of planets have an eccentricity of very close to 1, the radius is fine to use.
wait.. does F= m.V^2 / R comes from the centripetal acceleration multiplied by the mass. but the centripetal forces only imply for an object that is orbiting CIRCULARLY in which explained on the FIRST KEPPLER'S law, planets orbit in an oval shape. shouldnt the equation be un usable if this was the case. Thankyou
You are right in that the orbits are elliptical. But they are very close to circular. Thus means that the centripetal formula is s good approximation although in theory needs to take account of the elliptical path.
Yes. Why would you ask? Keplers laws describe the motion of planets and the amount of data we have on planet positions is overwhelming that can easily verify keplers laws.
Isn’t it because of how the moon rotates as it revolves around the earth? Synchronous rotation? Where it takes just as long to rotate about its axis, as it does to make one revolution. I’m not sure why it’s like that though. I would assume it’s because of gravity. I’m sure billions of years ago it wasn’t like how it is now
@@PhysicsHigh but sir www.quora.com/Does-the-gravitational-constant-having-the-same-value-around-the-universe-mean-that-the-gravitational-fields-of-all-planets-etc-are-the-same#:~:text=No%2C%20the%20gravitational%20constant%20being,is%20not%20like%20the%20Earth.
They're saying what I am saying . You are mixing up up G , the gravitational constant, with 'g', the gravitational field strength. And Kepler's Law is about the G , the gravitational constant
Ok, but at 13:40, v = (2 • pi • r) / T would be the right formula for a circular orbit, but not for an elliptical one. It’s more or less correct for a planet (which have near-circular orbits), but not for a comet.
You are correct. I made the simplification of circular orbits as in high school that is what is required. But yes, this model then is not appropriate for comets
Very well explained, BUT it would have given me more knowlege with no sacrifice to you if you had moved the earth in ONLY the correct direction but not back and forth! every little bit from you adds to my knowledge.
When you went through 5 lectures and 3 discussions and still have no clue what the three laws are exactly, and a RUclips video can explain it clearly in less than 20 minutes. You really start questioning our country's education system...
Im glad I was able to hep you
I keep hearing different versions of this, the reason why you find RUclips videos simpler is most likely because you're simply paying more attention or because you have the ability to pause a video. If you have actually gone through 5 lectures and still didn't understand it, you might just be a dumbass.
The difference is people used to go and seek a great teacher, now children are provided one by the state that teachs a 3yo-3000yo curriculum.
same boat here this video saved so much time and was great to watch
@@PhysicsHigh help* why can't you spell
i think my brain just melted out through my ears - I can't fathom how you guys' brains just work like this. I have a huge respect towards all scientists but especially the ones dealing with mathematics . It truly is a talent you have to be born with, to see numbers in such a complex way and understand immediately. It takes me a long time to GET IT. Thank you for this video, it did help a lot!!
Imagine those times no schools, libraries, printing presses etc.. All these discoveries were interdependent.. how they had access to each others discoveries..who documented it?
@algotraderoptionnfutures4885 maybe they used WhatsApp back then
Trust me they are all extremely intelligent, more than me or you, but they work a lot too to become that good. There’s no miracle in science
@@algotraderoptionnfutures4885most sent letters to each other
It took me all night to understand the 3rd Law. Thanks for relating Newton and Kepler's Concepts
We will be reporting abt the 3rd law and now I'm starting to get scared just by seeing ur comment (knowing that I'm bad at physics) lmao
same @@cleyowki
5:37 is when he starts talking about the three laws.
You're welcome!
Thanks X
@@kedarhaldankar1316 You're welcome!
t.y.
Saved my life
My love
This is soo cool! I love the interactive way of learning. Thank you thank you! I have watched so many videos and only this one has really made sense to me.
time stamp for Laws Of Planetary Motion: 7:03
Thanks mate!
I know right? Why did he do such a long intro
@@untitiled1092 well, I needed it sooo i can say that it's fine since you don't know who'll be watching this video. Some might find history useful and for some might not.
Beautiful explanation but 7:44. Not exactly same nor 0
This was the video I was looking for.
So accessible this video content……. we should preserve this
very good explanation.
Thank you for helping me study how to play ksp
7:34 ah thats why slingshot maneuvers are in closest approach possible
very well done compliments
Love your profile pic 😂
Nice video and presentation.
Page 6:37 depicts sun and a second planet acts as one focal points. What happens if the second planet is located outside Earth’s orbit? What kind of elliptic orbit the earth may have?
What's fascinating about Kepler is that his belief in a God that created a perfect and ordered universe is what spurred him on to create a more accurate model for revolutions. The math is quite something!
start at 6:00
this helped me a lot with my science essay, it helped me more clearly understand the three laws
It really was short and brief.
Me too
Also subscribe to my channel
@@untitiled1092 No I will definitly not
thx for the video
Nice explanation
Beautiful presentation ! Thank you.
Wow, excellent video!
Thank you so much! I had to study Johannes Kepler for a school project and all other videos and websites were really confusing. You did such a good job explaining and simplifying Kepler's three laws. I would love to hear more from you!
Thanks. I have lots of videos on various topics and more to come.
🔥🔥this is amazingggg🥺🥺
Well done
really i am so grateful for you thanks !!!
Thank you so much, keep up the good work dude ❤
Thanks
When can I use R for radius and r for radius, or can it be used whenever I want?
We usually use a lowercase ‘r’.
Thank you
Well done!
Good video
Great explanations. You are much better than my classroom teacher.
But I suppose Kepler's law of period r^3/t^2=GM/4^2 would only work when the object revolving around a central mass in a circular motion. However, from the video, the eccentricity of mercury is 0.206, which should be large enough for its motion to be considered as elliptical. So my question is can you actually derive a equation that describe such an elliptical motion.
Kepler's third law is actually based on the semi major axis (aka r is the length of the semi major axis) so it applies to mercury was well
To derive what R^3/T^2 equal to, you applied v= 2pi/r which is a formula for circle, and you applied the formula for uniform circular motion F= mv^2/r. Well, then the left hand side of Kepler's third law is for an ellipse, but the right hand side is derived using properties of circles. At least to me, it should not work with ellipse.
Thank you ❤
awesome! I refer to this video often in my college astronomy class.
Thank you for your beautiful explanations.
How is it that Kepler was correct in his calculations despite his belief 18:39 that the earth is the centre of the planetary system when the sun is.
Ramzi
Man that was really cool!
Very well explained
Good day, Sir may I know what application did you use in this video? It would mean a lot if you respond. Thank you!
You’ll find all that info on my website.
The gemogratimore octavious of closer to 8 the prom is equatable
I have a different notion too
Great explanation
Glad you liked it
thank homie this helped with my assignment
Glad it helped
Nice video
Fact: over a 15-year period (of 5495 days) Mars returns facing a given star in this curious sequence of time intervals: 707 + 707 + 707 +707 + 707 +707+ 707 + 546 days. As expounded and illustrated in Chapter 5 of my new TYCHOS book (2nd Edition / Dec 2023), this means that the geoheliocentric model devised by Tycho Brahe is the only possible configuration of our Solar System. This, because the 'odd behavior' of Mars - what with its "short Empiric Sidereal Interval" of only 546 days is - perfectly accounted for in Brahe's model. It is now high time to realize this undeniable fact - and to expose Kepler's fraudulent ways in his vain quest to validate heliocentrism (as already discovered and denounced by Prof. W.H. Donahue - the American translator of Kepler's "Astronomia Nova" - back in 1988).
Great Job
Blow?
how did kepler's laws of planetary motion change some of the ideas in the ptolemaic and copernican theories?
This needs a longer response but in essence Ptolemaic model was geocentric the others heliocentric. Copernican model was circular where as Kepler demonstrated it was elliptical.
@@PhysicsHigh Thank you very much, now I got my answer for my homework💕
Good video. I am the first viewer, from India.
@@pedrovillalobos1995 WHAT??
Wow...I didn't know that Uranus has a period of 30,589 days...that is such a long time for it's neighbors to put up with I think.
How does Kepler’s third law apply to elliptical orbits if it was derived from equations of uniform circular motion?
Actually Kleplers‘s law is derived on
ellipses where “r” is the semi major axis. A circle is simply and an ellipse where the semimajor axis and the semi minor axis are the same size.
Dang, such an amazing video. Explained everything very well
how dose it go the same speed if it is far away didn't he just say it was slower when its far away by the way I am talking about the 1st law
Of course nobody answers...
Not sure what you are asking. A object in an elliptical orbit will have a variable speed, faster when it’s closer. Kepler describes this but could explain it. It took Newton to explain with Gravitation
Wonderfully explained, Sir.
good explanation skill
boonwalak pathomwongsakul love you dear
thank you this helped a lot
thanks sir,i really enjoyed the video
Glad to hear that
On Keplers third law with the radius, how do you measure radius of an ellipse since it's constantly changing? Do you take the average radius across a single revolution or does it not matter and can you just take the radius at any point in the ellipse?
I believe its indeed the average
It's the mean/average distance from the Sun i.e. radius.
Skipped over some of the explanation of the formulas in 3rd law proofing. If you are going to explain it, please do it completely, step by step, without holes. Thanks.
A gem of a channel !
Thanks for that.
I am so glad that I am enrolled in a college physics course that will only ever be of use to me in Kerbal Space Program
this helped me so much with school thank you so much
Yes it really helped .. thank you ...
How can you measure the radius in elipses? wouldn't the radius change in different positions of the planet.
Good question
The actual Keller’s law refers to the half the semi major axis. With a circle it’s the radius with an ellipse it’s half the greater diameter. Since most orbits of planets have an eccentricity of very close to 1, the radius is fine to use.
@@PhysicsHigh alright I get it, thanks a lot dude,
Thank you so much sir.
Great video. I really enjoyed learning it. Thanks
wait.. does F= m.V^2 / R comes from the centripetal acceleration multiplied by the mass. but the centripetal forces only imply for an object that is orbiting CIRCULARLY in which explained on the FIRST KEPPLER'S law, planets orbit in an oval shape. shouldnt the equation be un usable if this was the case. Thankyou
You are right in that the orbits are elliptical. But they are very close to circular. Thus means that the centripetal formula is s good approximation although in theory needs to take account of the elliptical path.
Thankyou very much
If Apoapsis-Periapsis = 0, then Eccentricity = 0.
Excellent
Hi it nice video
I have question for you What is ellipse ? in first law of Keplers
Thankksss
What software and hardware do you use to make your videos?
See my website under FAQ where I go through the equipment I use.
Does the elliptic orbit nature here corroborates the fact that the earth is not exactly spherical as it appears ??
Would you allow me to mirror this on my channel? I'm looking for some solid basic science instruction for my viewers.
13:45 Why is the velocity taken for a circular motion while it isn't circular but elliptical ?
True, but the case of high school circle a good approximation.
very good explanation skill
Is Kepler’s first, second, and third law of planetary motion is true? EXPLAIN.
Yes. Why would you ask?
Keplers laws describe the motion of planets and the amount of data we have on planet positions is overwhelming that can easily verify keplers laws.
Very nicely explained
Please explain/illustrate how/why the moon is tidally locked showing Earth only about 59% of its surface.
Spoiler: The moon is flat too.
Isn’t it because of how the moon rotates as it revolves around the earth?
Synchronous rotation? Where it takes just as long to rotate about its axis, as it does to make one revolution.
I’m not sure why it’s like that though. I would assume it’s because of gravity. I’m sure billions of years ago it wasn’t like how it is now
Thanks a lot, it's very helpful.
Beautifully & delightfully explained. Thanks so much!!
thanks sir.
Thank you for this, it helped allot with multiple research papers. Keep it up!
How this r for every planet came from bcz the path is eliptical so r is not constant. So how it came from?
Can someone explain why is R^3/T^2 the same for all the planets even though each planet has a different G?
G is a constant value independent of the mass of any planet
@@PhysicsHigh but sir
www.quora.com/Does-the-gravitational-constant-having-the-same-value-around-the-universe-mean-that-the-gravitational-fields-of-all-planets-etc-are-the-same#:~:text=No%2C%20the%20gravitational%20constant%20being,is%20not%20like%20the%20Earth.
They're saying what I am saying . You are mixing up up G , the gravitational constant, with 'g', the gravitational field strength. And Kepler's Law is about the G , the gravitational constant
@@PhysicsHigh Thank you sir my doubt is cleared
Awesome!!!
Thank you. Very interesting.
very impressive method of instruction
Is "Planetary Law of Motion" same as "Law of Planetary Motion"?
Just asking.
Very helpful. Thanks.
Ok, but at 13:40, v = (2 • pi • r) / T would be the right formula for a circular orbit, but not for an elliptical one. It’s more or less correct for a planet (which have near-circular orbits), but not for a comet.
You are correct. I made the simplification of circular orbits as in high school that is what is required. But yes, this model then is not appropriate for comets
Most clear explanation!
I am unable to understand keplers 3rd law
Dont know why???
Its very tuffffffff😥
how do you do powerpoint presenataions like that? the one that allows the earth move
I love your video.
This is highly helpful. Such an explantion in 20 min. Thank you very much sir for such an outstanding explantion
Question: What software do you use to produce these videos?
I use Inspire from Promethian
Thank you so much....
Very well explained, BUT it would have given me more knowlege with no sacrifice to you if you had moved the earth in ONLY the correct direction but not back and forth! every little bit from you adds to my knowledge.
buddy thank you for this amazing video but you are wrong. K=T^2/R^3 and not the reciprocal
This is just misdirection to prevent you from discovering the simulation sequence.Hint: Look for the subtle glitches.
absolute legend. thanks a bunch mate
Thanks 😊
excellent
Thanks
Thank you sir it was really helpful
When and how did the idea of "squaring" become so important in math?
Look up Emilie Du Châtelet