I'm not an engineer, but it seems that these connecting rods were designed to resist compression end to end, rather than being pulled apart. The failure points (top ring, cap bolts) would not be so stressed in a compression test. Still an interesting video. Love the channel!
Yeah i saw bend rods because of long term use and to much power. But not because of a pull =/ Its not existent in a Piston Engine. I hope he can redo this one.
@@Fincher123The piston stops and starts one hundred times per second at 6,000 rpm. In the third stroke, during the intake, a tensile force acts because the crankshaft pulls on it.
I'm a Mechanical Engineer, and my opinion is that this component was designed to work at high temperatures and in fatigue. Testing the failure point by pulling only tells us the material yield strength, which may not be important for this application. It is interesting, however, to see how different designs cause different failure points. Some failed due to bearing loads, while others failed at the screws.
Bear with me u and I both know that fatigue Is correlated to yield strength we need malleable high yield for fatigue So kinda we can speculate which was a good rod which wasn't, if we knew the steel and material grade
Yes but all of them are designed like evry bolt/nut connection is kind of fuse in mechanics. remember that. It is fuse before bigger, more expensive repair.
Źle przeprowadzone badanie wytrzymałości. Korbowody obciążane są siłą ściskającą a nie rozciągającą i tak zostały zaprojektowane. Wynik tego bezsensownego rozciągania nie mówi nic
Soy CRISTIANO evangélico y deseche las religiones incluido los pentecostales : Sus iglesias están divididas en llamados lugar santo y lugar santísimo en sus templos hay 2 pulpitos, para ellos no se partió el velo en dos. Sus iglesias son paredes y no humanas (Templo Viviente de Dios). Piden diezmos, se creen levitas, entonces debería de haber dos tipos de sacerdocio levita en general que recibían el diezmo (Num. 8:24-26) y deberían de dar el diezmo del diezmo a los sumos sacerdotes (Num. 18:26) y los levitas sumo sacerdote descendiente de Aarón. El diezmo era para el huertano la viuda el desamparado para el extranjero (Deut. 14:22-29). Ya no hay diezmo, pero ellos piden a diaria, semanal mensual, los diezmos eran cada año y otro cada tres años todo eso pertenecía a la ley dada a los judíos. Ellos declaran con su boca entonces ya no necesitan a Cristo, si todo ellos en su error todo pueden con su boca entonces están endiosándose, tremenda mentira, Cristo nos enseñó que dijéramos: si Dios lo permite are el uno u otra cosa. Idolatran a Israel terrenal (anticristos), lo llaman el pueblo de Dios y a los que creen en CRISTO los llaman gentiles (apartado de Dios olvidados de Dios) la escritura dice quien rechaza a CRISTO está condenado (Juan 3:18) y el que acepta a CRISTO JESÚS ya es salvo para vida eterna. Entonces a quien le creo a CRISTO JESÚS o a religiosos mentirosos llamados pentecostales. El pueblo de Dios son los Cristianos que recibieron título de ser llamados hijos de Dios.. Desconocen que los verdaderos judíos son los remanentes hijos de Dios es decir los Cristianos del mundo, el pueblo de Dios, somos los Cristianos. Los mentirosos dicen que para los Cristianos no hay tribulación, no saben cómo vivieron los primeros Cristianos, en roma en Israel, perseguidos, asesinados, quemados, acontecimientos en el coliseo romano, el incendio de roma, persecuciones, por judíos claro ejemplo Saulo perseguidor autorizado por gobierno judíos, inquisición etc etc, y que según esos mentirosos ellos serán raptados en secreto sin que nadie lo sepa y para ellos no hay sufrimiento engañan diciendo son hijo de dios rico y anhelan riquezas y poder terrenal. Dios nada hace en secreto ni se esconde de nadie, todo lo hace avisando miles de años antes y a ojo de todos. Ellos no predican a CRISTO JESÚS, ellos predican a la mentira que no existe (jeova, yave , buda, ala etc.etc. etc) todo el que rechaza a CRISTO JESÚS entonces el tal es bestia (anticristo) Obligan vacunarse. Hablan lenguas que nadie les entiende. Por sus obras los conocerás dice nuestro señor Dios y salvador CRISTO JESÚS. Soy Cristiano hijo de CRISTO JESÚS mi Dios y salvador regresara pronto en las nubes del cielo y todo ojo lo verá ahí mandara recogernos a sus Ángeles con voz de trompeta nos reuniremos su iglesia (todos los Cristianos verdaderos del mundo) CRISTO es la cabeza de la iglesia, ahí las bodas del cordero. Antes de destruir esta tierra y este cielo reinará mil años este planeta, pero antes encarcela por mil años a satanás. Al falso profeta (religiones) y a la bestia (espíritus inmundos seguidores de satanás, google, Facebook, QR, chip, ciencia usada para el mal) serán lanzados al infierno vivos. Después de los mil años satanás es soltado de su prisión no se arrepiente y es lanzado al infierno la candela que no se apaga ni su gusano muere, desaparece este mundo y este cielo inmundo por causa del pecado, nada inmundo prevalece, ahora Dios todo lo hace nuevo, nuevo cielo y nueva tierra, Dios Reyna para siempre. ( 1 Juan 5:7 Porque tres son los que dan testimonio en el cielo: el Padre, el Verbo y el Espíritu Santo; y estos tres son uno.) Dios resumió toda la Biblia en dos mandamientos. El verdadero amor ( CRISTO JESÚS )
I'm also an engineer (mech), and the largest stress is stopping the piston on its way up the exhaust stroke and starting the piston back down the intake stroke. If compression was the big issue, rod bolts/screws wouldn't be a big deal to worry about.
Must not be a very good one, the inertia of stopping the piston on the exhaust stroke is massive. Cylinder pressure and high RPM both break rods, just in opposite ways.
I agree I've been an engine mechanic building hard Rock engines 6 cylinders and V8 for about 55 years and definitely those rods could take a lot more being pushed down and pulled apart
The velocity of the pistons will exaggerate the strain that the connecting rods have to endure, meaning that it will have to reliably support upwards of 10,000kg in extreme instances
the M10 ones are really strong af, I seized a piston because a ring exploded and the rod just kept pushing the melted piston against the block without bending, still using the same rods and head on a different motor
I'm not an engineer but I know that connecting rods connects the piston to the crank where the crank accelerates the connecting rod and the piston upwards in a manner of compression, then the crank accelerates the connecting rod and piston down in retention and also the piston pushes downwards on the connecting rod against the crank in compression. I think this video was awesome to find out how strong the connecting rods are in retention. Gives one a perspective of the torturous work environment of a piston engine and how strong these connecting rods are. Thank you! Was so cool to see how strong the shackles was and when one broke, that was cool!
The largest stress on the rod is stopping the piston on its way up the exhaust stroke and starting the piston back down the intake stroke. If compression was the big issue, rod bolts/screws wouldn't be a big deal to worry about. Not saying compression from power stroke is nothing, but the exhaust crossover is the highest load on the rod. BTW, you can't stretch the bolts/screws without stretching the rod.
Still a good representation of the rods ultimate strength. Maybe you can rig up some shit and demonstrate your ideas and make a video and show everyone how it's done. I'll watch it.....
Depending on the revs the engine is doing the tensile stresses of a rod can be significantly higher than the compressive forces. On a Diesel the compressive forces are definitely stronger under compression than under tension due to the low revs, high compression ratios and high reciprocating mass, while it's usually the opposite for most petrol engines.
They absolutley ARE The rod is naturally MUCH stronger in compression - its the weakest in tension when its trying to throw the piston off the rod at the end of the exhaust / beginning intake stroke at maximum RPM. This is why the diesel rod is so badly - it never has to rev very high, yet it experiences a much higher compression ratio and combustion pressures than the petrol - this is why diesel engines are cast iron. Quote "The 5.2-liter V10 that debuted in the 2009 Audi R8 has the highest mean piston speed for any production car (26.9 m/s) " " high speed diesel ~14-17 m/s for automobile engines"
@@tomast9034 I am not sure what you mean, do you mind explaining? I don't see how there are any gasses helping to offset the inertial force when the piston goes past TDC during the exhaust / intake stroke transition?
just shows they went with "better to much material, than having an early failure" cuz they hadnt the right alloys, precise calculatings and numbers nor the know how and all back then, like they got today.
The old steel ones, practically indestructible, weigh much more than the aluminum ones used in competition, or with alloy, which are the ones used today in consumer cars. The advantages of reducing weight in the connecting rod are less vibration and energy efficiency.
Compression doesn't cause rods to fail Tension does as it rapidly accelerates the piston downward the rod bolts fail in most engine failures. Good video
THANK YOU!!!!! i was waiting for someone to say this before i had to, which i hate having to do because then i add the fact that i am a former materials testing engineer lol
I really liked this video. The connecting rods are subjected to compressive stress (due to the pressure peak after combustion) but also to bending and tensile stress (due to the piston's inertia at top dead center between exhaust and intake strokes). Therefore, the video makes sense and shows the tensile failure of the connecting rod, so well done. However, it's important to note that the strongest connecting rod isn't necessarily the best one. A connecting rod must withstand the loads while being as light as possible, meaning using less material (less material translates to less resistance). Engineers therefore don't seek a very strong but heavy connecting rod, but rather one that is just strong enough and as light as possible
I’ve been an engine rebuilder, among many other things, for 25 years now and I can tell you this is a good video of the wrong testing, connecting rods are under compression pressure most of the time, that is why this test is only checking the tensile strength of the metal in the wrong direction. Compress the connecting rod to see when it fails, that would be the video to make. If you notice in some of the tests the connecting rod doesn’t break, the bolts at the connecting rod bearing cap breaks first which is what they’re designed to do in case of a seized piston or crankshaft failure.
For those saying tension isn't relevant, you're wrong. Tension occurs when the piston is at top of the exhaust stroke. Compression is also interesting, especially for engines that are boosted.
The piston rods were all fine and survived fully intact: it was the big end clamp bolts that all broke so really this test is completely inconclusive in virtually every regard!
How so? There's one little end failure and rod bolts failing is a thing, especially on modified or higher rpm engines! Often a bearing failure is the cause or even a money shift! strong bolts save block's!
This shows exaclt why the main thing is piston rods is a bolt upgrade. Even when you upgrade to aftermarket rods, the bolts in the main caps are critical. The rod is made to be placed under tremendous load during the power stroke, the bolts hoding the cap on the rod are loaded when the piston/rod assy hits the top of the stroke and there is a near immediate change in direction. The forces are gigantic on the bolts because the piston/rods assy has kinetic energy in one direction then it pulled in the opposite direction.
Used to make forged connecting rods for GM, Dodge, Ford, Honda. We used to do crush and strength tests on them a few times daily. They would frequently fail, not by a lot, but they’d fall outside the minimum spec, they shipped them anyway. That’s pretty par for the course in the automotive industry
Excess weight reduces power and increases fuel consumption, OR it induces unnecessary cost. Manufacturing processes are much more consistent these days (unless you’re just making down to the lowest cost). The only problem here would be if the test limit was set inappropriately low. Is that what you’re getting at?
You can tell the more modern conrods from the older ones by the clam shell break. The old ones are ground but modern big ends are fractured as it’s better and no grinding or machining needed on the two half joint points.
This test is not valid. These parts, inside the engine, are just applied to traction during the air admission. The correct test would be the compression testing emulating when the expansion inside the cylinder happens.
Without the mixture being ignited, you have tensile forces and compressive forces in the same ratio. Tensile force at top dead center and compressive force at bottom dead center. When the mixture is ignited, the forces resulting from the speed alone are added to the compressive forces from the combustion of the mixture. So, logically, the compressive forces are always higher.
Schade das nicht die Gewichte der jeweiligen Pleuel angegeben wurden sind. Es geht ja bekannter Art und Weise um die Gewichtsoptimierung der beweglichen Komponenten. Desweiteren ist die Zusammensetzung des Werkstoffes ein Faktor. Ich sehe einen reinen (nicht sonderlich guten) Unterhaltungswert dieses Beitrages mit sehr eingeschränkten Erkenntnisgrad.
It seems that most engineers and nonengineers forget about the force of inertia. If it wasnt a factor one should be able to use any old bolt to clamp the bigend bearing. The piston has weight that needs to be held on to the conrod on the strokes when compresion doesnt take place. It is a fourstroke engine right?
I am an marine engineer and my studies included combustion engine design studies. The most important thing is the durability of the connecting rod in terms of buckling in the direction of rotation. Look at the profile of the connecting rod in which direction it is strongest.
As many have already pointed out the load-case (pulling) is not the most relevant for connecting rods. Also I don't know if these vehicles expected to provide similar loads. You do not use the same rod on a lawnmower and a big truck after all. Finally it may illustrate that more current designs can be made smaller and lighter, as now know to a larger extent what the actual loads are, and can reduce the safety-margins that had to be factored in due to uncertainties.
Отличный тест!!! Многие пишутчто шатун расчитан справляться с жатием , но при этом забывают что шатуну нужно бороться или выдерживать силу которая действует на его растяжение. Сила эта возникает когда точка вмт достигнута, шатун должен остановить поршень который также двигался в сторону вмт. В точке вмт происходит моментальная остановка поршня который в этот момент имеет определенную массу- которая упрощенно складывается из веса- поршень, поршневой палец, кольца +направление и скорость его движения. Если еще проще то шатун в точке вмт моментально останавливает поршень который уже имеет огромную массу , ещё в этот момент остановки поршня, шатун уже начинает обратное ускоряемое движение относительно движения поршня что ещё больше действует на растяжение шатуна. Это в кратце)
Ну да, ну да. И сравни с силой, которая будет через мнгновение давить на поршень и пихать его в НМТ. Там разница как слон и моська. По этому, проверять надо на сжатие. Что и говорят зрители. А так он тупо проверяет болты на разрыв, а не шатун.
@@megavolt6054 кстати ещё в видео шатун от 412ого москвича бмвшным обозвал)) В русской версии этого ролика всё правильно названо. Автор боится что удалят канал за упоминание чего то советского/русского что-ли?))
I think the two most impressive things about this video were the breaking strain of the old 1960s BMW conrod, and the very small dimension of the Nissan X-Trail rod portion of the assembly. Without having to be an engineer, common sense says the greatest force on the actual rod part of the conrod assembly comes sometime around TDC just before or as the plug fires for the power stroke. Most broken rods i've seen are twisted or bent over perpendicular to the crankshaft rotational direction. (Due to immense forces acting in compression causing a lateral deformation across the narrow dimension of the rod) Because in this test mostly the big end eye bolts broke, that proves tht the "rod" portion is immensely stronger than it needs to be in tension. However, in compression would be more important and clearly the Japanese have made an effort to understand this for acheap mass produced vehicle and the rod dimension is fit for purpose. Ie, less is more. (Less weight, more performance within the designed parameters!) If this were not true the old BMW 1960s example woud have broken first as it is undoubtedly the lowest performance engine of the lot. Certainly not criticising the German's but ultimately this test was only entertaining and proves very little. Compressing the rod would be much more telling. Yet again, using common sense says the weak point in tension is the least square area of metal, probably the two big end eye bolts, and presumably there's also a kind of torque force acting on these in tension. The fact that the shackle bolt gave up in one test also means a hollow wrist pin/gudgeon pin if you will, would also break or deform before the conrod! Ultimately compressing them and finding the yield force (when the conrod bends even slightly) would be the only relevant test for purpose in an engine as proven by the fact the 8000kg+ went through all of them in tension. There is no way that acceleration force exists in any of the engines the parts came from! Bloody entertaining though😅
Allora se vokete fare la prova per resisyenza alla forza angolare dei giri motore dovevate pesare le bielle indicare con che metallo fatte e comunque la prova vera sarebbe meglio in compressione
Many screws broke. Furthermore, cars back then had more metal, still didn't last longer. Look at the performance today, a VW TDI makes 600,000 km, back then a Golf Diesel was finished with 150,000 max.
weight of each would be interesting to know (although bore/stroke length plays its role). The old BMW fourcylinders are famous for a reason..How about a Volvo red-block fourcylinder test?
Cool experiment. Though rods are more stronger being pushed. Now to compare the old ones, the older rods are more thicker and heavier, but due to today's advancements in metallurgy, we can manufacture smaller and lighter rods that more or less exceeds the strength of the old thicker rods. Perhaps you can try to test it by pushing the rods next time?
I wonder if there's a benefit to having weaker bolts. Perhaps under unusual stress a weak bolt takes the deformation rather than the piston rod. So the bolts act as the sacrificial part. Cheaper to fix than replacing the rod. Idk, but in most machinery, if it's going to break, you'd prefer certain parts to break first rather than others.
Once the bolt goes the conrod is going to get jammed up somewhere and most proablly go through the side of the block. Replacing the con rod after that is the least of the owners worries
If one bolt fails, the rod will not ever survive it. Other likely collateral damage often includes block, head, piston, crankshaft, and valves. It all has to survive, or it can all be "sacrificial parts".
Honestly, the xtrail really impressed me. Everyone knows BMW engines are tough. But this nissan rod looks pretty weak, but it does the job. Good job, man.
For the people that thinks that the rods are designed to resist only to the compression phase, you are totally wrong, they also have to resist to the cross valve phase after exhaust when there's no compression, the piston pulls the rod upwards with it's inertia while the crankshaft pulls it down with it's cinetic power, this is the moment that they break at high rpm's also breaking the side of the engine block where the rod touches inside the cylinder. Obviously is not the same forces as this hydraulic machine puts on the rods, considering the engine from factory on normal conditions. It's just a simulation that can break the majority of the rods existent on the market. For instance, on the compression or combustion phases, the rods can bend in case of hydraulic lock on the piston, caused by water of the radiator that can mixture with the engine oil in case of head gasket failure and other reasons.
@@billbailey55 I guess it's dificult to this ocurring to the VW aircooled since it's an over squared engine, also the heads would overheat and crack in the high rpm's before any rods failure but it can happen to any engine, depends on many factors.
- To make test fair, it have to be connecting rods that never have been installed in an engine. (especially metal fatigue on bolts and Wrist pin end) * bolts holding crankshaft bearing have to be the same hardening (etc. 8.8) * connecting rods were stronger and heavier before (Cast iron), * now they are lighter, not common with cast iron. (usealy iron steel alloys like 42CrMo4, 43CrMo4, 44csr4, C-70, EN-8D, SAE1141, etc.)
It would be nice to see the rods strenght in compression as well. In a high Rpm NA enginge, the pulling forces will be the limitating factor of the rods, but in high hp(high torque) it will be the compressing force that limits the rods. Its not as black and white as you can read in all the "expert comments here". A big trapetzodial shape as the M3 rods have will be the strongest in compressing forces.
I don’t think the videos useless at all. I think it’s highly informational on what cars you definitely should not drive because whether it’s designed to push or pull It shows which ones are weaker and which ones are stronger. Some of these companies are using weaker metals which caused your rod Two break sooner I see a lot now in small engines. I’m replacing a lot of pistons and rods. It’s a great video thing about what you’re driving and give the man props.
Rods resist compression very well, and they resist extension much worse. Both of the forces act on the rods and accordingly during engine work, the forces are strong during in compression and weaker for tension. Reality is that rod is designed in optimal way for both of directions and if the design was good (no exaggerated or inadequate strength in any direction) then usually has equal chance to fail in both of them.
So impressive and interesting, thanks a million. However, what I noticed is that the rods fail mainly from bolt fracture. I am not sure but the tensile test seems to me that it is stressing the bolt/bolt heads.
Interesting that in most cases the bolts broke. There was one comment about the process of pulling apart but the comment was about compression on the rod. A connecting rod goes through multiple cycles of being under compression and lateral expansion and in between as it changes direction in a 4 cycle engine. Federal Mogul has graft charts showing the rotational stresses on their engine bearings . It’s quite amazing all the different stress put on rods , pistons, crankshafts during each degree on engine rotation. Sometimes I wonder how in the hell they actually stay together in the first place 🤔🤪😂👍
Primary load is gasoline exploding in cylinder. Compression is primary load. The follow though stoke motion has some loading. Testing in non primary load is your choice.
Thats an interesting test, but you should be testing for compressive force if you want to simulate the stress inside of an engine(torque), but those results give already some idea on how strong they are and if they can rev high.
Interessante saber que a biela que venceu o teste de resistência foi justamente do carro mais antigo. Apesar de que esses componentes não foram projetados para suportar pressão com vetores em sentidos contrarios da forma como aconteceu no vídeo, assim mesmo é muito interessante.
It would've made more sense to have them fail in compression and use the buckling equation or the shape-effect relationship and the cross section of each rod to compare the actual material strength of each rod
Lot's of engineers.. Lot's of Comments. This is just another test - tension. These rods are under dynamic loading i.e tension and compression 2000, 5000 cycles per minute. Fatique could be more important than static loading. In addition the connecting rod connects to the piston, so the weight of the piston is really important (especially when high revs and high acceleration at TDC - Top Dead Centre). If combined with the explosion that pushes the piston down (DIFFERENT COMPRESSION RATIOS FOR DIESEL AND PETROL ENGINES) then you understand that there are are many other things to consider (CRANKSHAFT, LUBRIACATION, BEARINGS) as well as momentum (the heavier the rod creates more stress to the whole system) . Therefore this is just one of the tests but the there could be 100s of test to check regarding an engine - which a dynamic system , works at different revs, temperatures, lubrication , compression ratios etc
*EVERYONE IN THE COMMENTS SAYING IT NEEDS TO BE IN COMPRESSION* here are the facts: The rod is naturally MUCH stronger in compression - its the weakest in tension when its trying to throw the piston off the rod at the end of the exhaust / beginning intake stroke at maximum RPM. This is why the diesel rod does so badly - it never has to rev very high, yet it experiences a much higher compression ratio and combustion pressures than the petrol - this is why diesel engines are cast iron. Quote "The 5.2-liter V10 that debuted in the 2009 Audi R8 has the highest mean piston speed for any production car (26.9 m/s) " " high speed diesel ~14-17 m/s for automobile engines" CON RODS main failure is in TENSION, a compression failure usually occurs when hydraulic-ed or when the timing is advanced too much .
Two question why did you photoshoped a compression test photo and did pulling, and why did you do continuation for the rodnwhich didnt break .. it went way behind yung module. The number in not correct for this one.
Yeah this is more of a pulling effect there is a pulling effect and a compression effect on a rod up and down movements on both ends exchange at times... it's push and pull method pretty much... so now the same exact rods should be tested Under Pressure now
My understanding the rod assbly are to work in extension and compression Unlike the pin shackles only work in the extension only This maybe why engines grenade themselves in the exhaust cycle not so much in the compression cycle noted this on a Chrysler 225 slant sixes a very long stroker
I'm not an engineer, but it seems that these connecting rods were designed to resist compression end to end, rather than being pulled apart. The failure points (top ring, cap bolts) would not be so stressed in a compression test. Still an interesting video. Love the channel!
Yeah i saw bend rods because of long term use and to much power.
But not because of a pull =/
Its not existent in a Piston Engine.
I hope he can redo this one.
@@Fincher123The piston stops and starts one hundred times per second at 6,000 rpm. In the third stroke, during the intake, a tensile force acts because the crankshaft pulls on it.
Good thing you said
"I'm not an engineer"
@@gvertm3158 oh yeah thats right. Sorry i pull back =)
Most rods fail from being pulled apart. The piston being accelerated up the the crank pulling in down tears rods/rod bolts apart
I'm a Mechanical Engineer, and my opinion is that this component was designed to work at high temperatures and in fatigue. Testing the failure point by pulling only tells us the material yield strength, which may not be important for this application. It is interesting, however, to see how different designs cause different failure points. Some failed due to bearing loads, while others failed at the screws.
Cars run at 210 degrees so it's not extremely hot
The bolts or screws are the weakest point in a connecting rod and is in fact where most failures occur.
This 100%. That's the first thing I thought of was yield strength of the material.
Thank you... beat me to it!
Bear with me u and I both know that fatigue Is correlated to yield strength we need malleable high yield for fatigue
So kinda we can speculate which was a good rod which wasn't, if we knew the steel and material grade
No VPN, no mobile games ad, no links, no talking, just straight to business!
Every man's dream.... to watch a video of another man crushing stuff and the only thing better is the something just more accessible and less hussle😂
there was a tv commercial something like dont f around call ......:D
How do YOU know??
Rare thing nowdays
I've got mobile games ad 😂
Pulling only stresses the bolts a lot. We expected to see compression & rods bending.
Yes but all of them are designed like evry bolt/nut connection is kind of fuse in mechanics. remember that. It is fuse before bigger, more expensive repair.
Źle przeprowadzone badanie wytrzymałości. Korbowody obciążane są siłą ściskającą a nie rozciągającą i tak zostały zaprojektowane. Wynik tego bezsensownego rozciągania nie mówi nic
Soy CRISTIANO evangélico y deseche las religiones incluido los pentecostales : Sus iglesias están divididas en llamados lugar santo y lugar santísimo en sus templos hay 2 pulpitos, para ellos no se partió el velo en dos. Sus iglesias son paredes y no humanas (Templo Viviente de Dios). Piden diezmos, se creen levitas, entonces debería de haber dos tipos de sacerdocio levita en general que recibían el diezmo (Num. 8:24-26) y deberían de dar el diezmo del diezmo a los sumos sacerdotes (Num. 18:26) y los levitas sumo sacerdote descendiente de Aarón. El diezmo era para el huertano la viuda el desamparado para el extranjero (Deut. 14:22-29). Ya no hay diezmo, pero ellos piden a diaria, semanal mensual, los diezmos eran cada año y otro cada tres años todo eso pertenecía a la ley dada a los judíos. Ellos declaran con su boca entonces ya no necesitan a Cristo, si todo ellos en su error todo pueden con su boca entonces están endiosándose, tremenda mentira, Cristo nos enseñó que dijéramos: si Dios lo permite are el uno u otra cosa.
Idolatran a Israel terrenal (anticristos), lo llaman el pueblo de Dios y a los que creen en CRISTO los llaman gentiles (apartado de Dios olvidados de Dios) la escritura dice quien rechaza a CRISTO está condenado (Juan 3:18) y el que acepta a CRISTO JESÚS ya es salvo para vida eterna. Entonces a quien le creo a CRISTO JESÚS o a religiosos mentirosos llamados pentecostales. El pueblo de Dios son los Cristianos que recibieron título de ser llamados hijos de Dios.. Desconocen que los verdaderos judíos son los remanentes hijos de Dios es decir los Cristianos del mundo, el pueblo de Dios, somos los Cristianos. Los mentirosos dicen que para los Cristianos no hay tribulación, no saben cómo vivieron los primeros Cristianos, en roma en Israel, perseguidos, asesinados, quemados, acontecimientos en el coliseo romano, el incendio de roma, persecuciones, por judíos claro ejemplo Saulo perseguidor autorizado por gobierno judíos, inquisición etc etc, y que según esos mentirosos ellos serán raptados en secreto sin que nadie lo sepa y para ellos no hay sufrimiento engañan diciendo son hijo de dios rico y anhelan riquezas y poder terrenal. Dios nada hace en secreto ni se esconde de nadie, todo lo hace avisando miles de años antes y a ojo de todos.
Ellos no predican a CRISTO JESÚS, ellos predican a la mentira que no existe (jeova, yave , buda, ala etc.etc. etc) todo el que rechaza a CRISTO JESÚS entonces el tal es bestia (anticristo)
Obligan vacunarse.
Hablan lenguas que nadie les entiende. Por sus obras los conocerás dice nuestro señor Dios y salvador CRISTO JESÚS.
Soy Cristiano hijo de CRISTO JESÚS mi Dios y salvador regresara pronto en las nubes del cielo y todo ojo lo verá ahí mandara recogernos a sus Ángeles con voz de trompeta nos reuniremos su iglesia (todos los Cristianos verdaderos del mundo) CRISTO es la cabeza de la iglesia, ahí las bodas del cordero.
Antes de destruir esta tierra y este cielo reinará mil años este planeta, pero antes encarcela por mil años a satanás. Al falso profeta (religiones) y a la bestia (espíritus inmundos seguidores de satanás, google, Facebook, QR, chip, ciencia usada para el mal) serán lanzados al infierno vivos. Después de los mil años satanás es soltado de su prisión no se arrepiente y es lanzado al infierno la candela que no se apaga ni su gusano muere, desaparece este mundo y este cielo inmundo por causa del pecado, nada inmundo prevalece, ahora Dios todo lo hace nuevo, nuevo cielo y nueva tierra, Dios Reyna para siempre.
( 1 Juan 5:7 Porque tres son los que dan testimonio en el cielo: el Padre, el Verbo y el Espíritu Santo; y estos tres son uno.)
Dios resumió toda la Biblia en dos mandamientos.
El verdadero amor ( CRISTO JESÚS )
@@AntekWyrwidomb but bolt/nut transfers negligible loads relative to the crankshaft itself
Was expecting compression benchmark too
I'm an engineer and I can sure tell you that this video is useless, these connecting rods were designed to compression, not to be pulled..
absolutely agree, movie just for movie))
I'm also an engineer (mech), and the largest stress is stopping the piston on its way up the exhaust stroke and starting the piston back down the intake stroke. If compression was the big issue, rod bolts/screws wouldn't be a big deal to worry about.
Wrong. Tension is generally the problem. I left a longer comment elsewhere.
actually its not useless. I am a blacksmith, fabricator, and machinist and BMW enthusiast but not an engineer. this is entertaining
Must not be a very good one, the inertia of stopping the piston on the exhaust stroke is massive. Cylinder pressure and high RPM both break rods, just in opposite ways.
This is more of a bolt strength test than rod breakage.
Spot on !
That's right.. Exactly as you wrote it..
Bingo
Two broke at the small loop, so not as you expected! Assumptions make an ass out of you
the bolts are the weakest part, thats why you upgrade to ARP on a big power engine. So the test ist correct
I agree I've been an engine mechanic building hard Rock engines 6 cylinders and V8 for about 55 years and definitely those rods could take a lot more being pushed down and pulled apart
10.000kg is 5 heavy sedan cars, It's 100% imposible for that level of weight to be pressed on that part of any engine whatsoever ever.
The velocity of the pistons will exaggerate the strain that the connecting rods have to endure, meaning that it will have to reliably support upwards of 10,000kg in extreme instances
the M10 ones are really strong af, I seized a piston because a ring exploded and the rod just kept pushing the melted piston against the block without bending, still using the same rods and head on a different motor
I'm not an engineer but I know that connecting rods connects the piston to the crank where the crank accelerates the connecting rod and the piston upwards in a manner of compression, then the crank accelerates the connecting rod and piston down in retention and also the piston pushes downwards on the connecting rod against the crank in compression. I think this video was awesome to find out how strong the connecting rods are in retention. Gives one a perspective of the torturous work environment of a piston engine and how strong these connecting rods are. Thank you! Was so cool to see how strong the shackles was and when one broke, that was cool!
Genuinely one of the most tense videos I've ever watched.
Ahh! You killed me🤣😂
The stress on a connecting rods is PUSHING from top to the bottom, this video is totaly useless. As said you stretch bolts, not connecting rods....
The largest stress on the rod is stopping the piston on its way up the exhaust stroke and starting the piston back down the intake stroke. If compression was the big issue, rod bolts/screws wouldn't be a big deal to worry about.
Not saying compression from power stroke is nothing, but the exhaust crossover is the highest load on the rod.
BTW, you can't stretch the bolts/screws without stretching the rod.
Are ya mad?
Still a good representation of the rods ultimate strength. Maybe you can rig up some shit and demonstrate your ideas and make a video and show everyone how it's done. I'll watch it.....
Why do you think engines have RPM redlines? The enertia of the piston at the end of the exhast stroke is trying to pull the rod apart.
I would have liked to see both
The stretch in the rods is actually visible. It would have been good to have some sort of grid or lines in the background to show that better.
That part. Eye love the comments in this video. Everybody actually got a interesting perspective
They wasn’t designed for pulling!
There is also tensile force in a four-stroke engine.
Depending on the revs the engine is doing the tensile stresses of a rod can be significantly higher than the compressive forces. On a Diesel the compressive forces are definitely stronger under compression than under tension due to the low revs, high compression ratios and high reciprocating mass, while it's usually the opposite for most petrol engines.
@@gvertm3158 not much. from slowing down the piston in tdc .... also the fresh mixture or the exhaust gases slow it down.
They absolutley ARE The rod is naturally MUCH stronger in compression - its the weakest in tension when its trying to throw the piston off the rod at the end of the exhaust / beginning intake stroke at maximum RPM.
This is why the diesel rod is so badly - it never has to rev very high, yet it experiences a much higher compression ratio and combustion pressures than the petrol - this is why diesel engines are cast iron.
Quote "The 5.2-liter V10 that debuted in the 2009 Audi R8 has the highest mean piston speed for any production car (26.9 m/s) "
" high speed diesel ~14-17 m/s for automobile engines"
@@tomast9034 I am not sure what you mean, do you mind explaining? I don't see how there are any gasses helping to offset the inertial force when the piston goes past TDC during the exhaust / intake stroke transition?
Una lastima que no lo hagas a compresión, ya que es la fuerza que soporta en su uso
anyway, newer engines, more and more relaxed engines 🤧, 😆😅 euro standard that destroys engines,,,,🤣
Ему бы тупо не хватило мощности пресса - сломать шатун на сжатие.
I was wondering about the 1960's engineers achieving such incredible massive force💪
RESPECT😂
It's steel that weighs twice as heavy as the others.
It’s just wasted weight. The older designs were more conservative with their load factors and were much heavier as a result.
just shows they went with "better to much material, than having an early failure" cuz they hadnt the right alloys, precise calculatings and numbers nor the know how and all back then, like they got today.
@@Hobby_trails_family_uneditedIt also lasts twice as long. That's why we get cheap crap nowadays so we buy a new car faster.
The old steel ones, practically indestructible, weigh much more than the aluminum ones used in competition, or with alloy, which are the ones used today in consumer cars. The advantages of reducing weight in the connecting rod are less vibration and energy efficiency.
CON RODS ARE DESIGNED TO SURVIVE COMPRESSION,LOAD NOT TENSILE LOAD
wrong
Yes but Tensile Load is also applied.
What happens when a 2 pound piston traveling upward at 26.9 m/s makes a sudden stop at TDC and reverses direction? A massive tensile load.
I d say both
No no, the tensile force can be higher at high rev than the compression force!
Compression doesn't cause rods to fail Tension does as it rapidly accelerates the piston downward the rod bolts fail in most engine failures. Good video
THANK YOU!!!!! i was waiting for someone to say this before i had to, which i hate having to do because then i add the fact that i am a former materials testing engineer lol
I really liked this video. The connecting rods are subjected to compressive stress (due to the pressure peak after combustion) but also to bending and tensile stress (due to the piston's inertia at top dead center between exhaust and intake strokes). Therefore, the video makes sense and shows the tensile failure of the connecting rod, so well done. However, it's important to note that the strongest connecting rod isn't necessarily the best one. A connecting rod must withstand the loads while being as light as possible, meaning using less material (less material translates to less resistance). Engineers therefore don't seek a very strong but heavy connecting rod, but rather one that is just strong enough and as light as possible
Very good and clearing analisis!
@@joaoferreira6327 thanks
Oh, someone who actually understands a bit of engine engineering has entered the chat! You are correct.
I’ve been an engine rebuilder, among many other things, for 25 years now and I can tell you this is a good video of the wrong testing, connecting rods are under compression pressure most of the time, that is why this test is only checking the tensile strength of the metal in the wrong direction. Compress the connecting rod to see when it fails, that would be the video to make. If you notice in some of the tests the connecting rod doesn’t break, the bolts at the connecting rod bearing cap breaks first which is what they’re designed to do in case of a seized piston or crankshaft failure.
It’s not that this testing is useless, it’s that the cover pic is clickbait.
Nearly useless.
For those saying tension isn't relevant, you're wrong. Tension occurs when the piston is at top of the exhaust stroke. Compression is also interesting, especially for engines that are boosted.
The piston rods were all fine and survived fully intact: it was the big end clamp bolts that all broke so really this test is completely inconclusive in virtually every regard!
How so? There's one little end failure and rod bolts failing is a thing, especially on modified or higher rpm engines! Often a bearing failure is the cause or even a money shift! strong bolts save block's!
This shows exaclt why the main thing is piston rods is a bolt upgrade. Even when you upgrade to aftermarket rods, the bolts in the main caps are critical. The rod is made to be placed under tremendous load during the power stroke, the bolts hoding the cap on the rod are loaded when the piston/rod assy hits the top of the stroke and there is a near immediate change in direction. The forces are gigantic on the bolts because the piston/rods assy has kinetic energy in one direction then it pulled in the opposite direction.
0@@Lawrence-uw6cs
Did you actually watch the whole video?
@@Chef-Jamesseguramente no
This was fun. Thanks. Most engine engineers only usually get to see this situation in CAE or (occasionally) scattered across the dyno room.
Moral of the story is, " Do not put your piston rods in a hydraulic press"!
Lol
The highest tensile force is at TDC on the exhaust stroke. It is tensile force that usually causes breakage during high rpm.
Used to make forged connecting rods for GM, Dodge, Ford, Honda. We used to do crush and strength tests on them a few times daily. They would frequently fail, not by a lot, but they’d fall outside the minimum spec, they shipped them anyway. That’s pretty par for the course in the automotive industry
Excess weight reduces power and increases fuel consumption, OR it induces unnecessary cost. Manufacturing processes are much more consistent these days (unless you’re just making down to the lowest cost). The only problem here would be if the test limit was set inappropriately low. Is that what you’re getting at?
You can tell the more modern conrods from the older ones by the clam shell break. The old ones are ground but modern big ends are fractured as it’s better and no grinding or machining needed on the two half joint points.
This test is not valid. These parts, inside the engine, are just applied to traction during the air admission. The correct test would be the compression testing emulating when the expansion inside the cylinder happens.
You forgot that an engine has 3 or more pistons traveling at opposite directions
The x-trail rod is so skinny!
$$$$😂😂😂
It was not designed for high perfomance engines.
Light piston and Excellent Balancing.👍
Light engine designed for torque. Brilliantly to my eye.
@@gentle285 Well, it is a Nissan...
great your tests are really very useful for users especially those who are interested in cars and gadgets thank you
No wonder the the old BMW motor was able to take 1400HP in F1.
Completely forgot about any that!
those old BMW engines were astonishing
Not the Rods!!!
Remember hv its not The real forse its nytons/rpm. and......
Это не от bmw, а от русского автомобиля moskwitch 412( там есть на нем цифры "412" на 0:57). Автору просто стыдно.
I'm not an engineer and I can tell you these guys were probably drinking beer and thought this would be cool
I guess those old timers are right when they say “They don’t make’’em like they used to!”
Without the mixture being ignited, you have tensile forces and compressive forces in the same ratio. Tensile force at top dead center and compressive force at bottom dead center. When the mixture is ignited, the forces resulting from the speed alone are added to the compressive forces from the combustion of the mixture. So, logically, the compressive forces are always higher.
Schade das nicht die Gewichte der jeweiligen Pleuel angegeben wurden sind. Es geht ja bekannter Art und Weise um die Gewichtsoptimierung der beweglichen Komponenten. Desweiteren ist die Zusammensetzung des Werkstoffes ein Faktor. Ich sehe einen reinen (nicht sonderlich guten) Unterhaltungswert dieses Beitrages mit sehr eingeschränkten Erkenntnisgrad.
It seems that most engineers and nonengineers forget about the force of inertia. If it wasnt a factor one should be able to use any old bolt to clamp the bigend bearing. The piston has weight that needs to be held on to the conrod on the strokes when compresion doesnt take place. It is a fourstroke engine right?
M3, M5, 850 were not a surprised, those are performance models with forged internals bit 1500 is a typical family sedan, was a complete surprise… 😮
Это не шатун БМВ. Это шатун от moskwitch 412.
I am an marine engineer and my studies included combustion engine design studies. The most important thing is the durability of the connecting rod in terms of buckling in the direction of rotation. Look at the profile of the connecting rod in which direction it is strongest.
There is no doubt that the quality of metal in olden days is much better!
As many have already pointed out the load-case (pulling) is not the most relevant for connecting rods.
Also I don't know if these vehicles expected to provide similar loads. You do not use the same rod on a lawnmower and a big truck after all.
Finally it may illustrate that more current designs can be made smaller and lighter, as now know to a larger extent what the actual loads are, and can reduce the safety-margins that had to be factored in due to uncertainties.
Отличный тест!!! Многие пишутчто шатун расчитан справляться с жатием , но при этом забывают что шатуну нужно бороться или выдерживать силу которая действует на его растяжение. Сила эта возникает когда точка вмт достигнута, шатун должен остановить поршень который также двигался в сторону вмт. В точке вмт происходит моментальная остановка поршня который в этот момент имеет определенную массу- которая упрощенно складывается из веса- поршень, поршневой палец, кольца +направление и скорость его движения. Если еще проще то шатун в точке вмт моментально останавливает поршень который уже имеет огромную массу , ещё в этот момент остановки поршня, шатун уже начинает обратное ускоряемое движение относительно движения поршня что ещё больше действует на растяжение шатуна. Это в кратце)
Это называется импульс;))
@@efimkrivov Пусть сперва это переварят и осознают)) А так у них перелом мозга может случиться)))
Ну да, ну да. И сравни с силой, которая будет через мнгновение давить на поршень и пихать его в НМТ. Там разница как слон и моська. По этому, проверять надо на сжатие. Что и говорят зрители. А так он тупо проверяет болты на разрыв, а не шатун.
@@paulfox7401 а ты попробуй раскрутить предмет массой 400 г до таких оборотов и представь какая будет нагрузка на Отрыв.
@@megavolt6054 кстати ещё в видео шатун от 412ого москвича бмвшным обозвал)) В русской версии этого ролика всё правильно названо. Автор боится что удалят канал за упоминание чего то советского/русского что-ли?))
you deserve BIG LIKE for that job, BIG Thanks
This test makes no sense: connecting rods are not sized for traction but are designed for compression and buckling.
Traction?
I think the two most impressive things about this video were the breaking strain of the old 1960s BMW conrod, and the very small dimension of the Nissan X-Trail rod portion of the assembly.
Without having to be an engineer, common sense says the greatest force on the actual rod part of the conrod assembly comes sometime around TDC just before or as the plug fires for the power stroke.
Most broken rods i've seen are twisted or bent over perpendicular to the crankshaft rotational direction. (Due to immense forces acting in compression causing a lateral deformation across the narrow dimension of the rod)
Because in this test mostly the big end eye bolts broke, that proves tht the "rod" portion is immensely stronger than it needs to be in tension.
However, in compression would be more important and clearly the Japanese have made an effort to understand this for acheap mass produced vehicle and the rod dimension is fit for purpose. Ie, less is more. (Less weight, more performance within the designed parameters!) If this were not true the old BMW 1960s example woud have broken first as it is undoubtedly the lowest performance engine of the lot.
Certainly not criticising the German's but ultimately this test was only entertaining and proves very little.
Compressing the rod would be much more telling.
Yet again, using common sense says the weak point in tension is the least square area of metal, probably the two big end eye bolts, and presumably there's also a kind of torque force acting on these in tension.
The fact that the shackle bolt gave up in one test also means a hollow wrist pin/gudgeon pin if you will, would also break or deform before the conrod!
Ultimately compressing them and finding the yield force (when the conrod bends even slightly) would be the only relevant test for purpose in an engine as proven by the fact the 8000kg+ went through all of them in tension. There is no way that acceleration force exists in any of the engines the parts came from!
Bloody entertaining though😅
Yes Conrods are made for compression. This test means NOTHING 🤬
Calm down Partner
Yes, it does; high rpm sustainability
Allora se vokete fare la prova per resisyenza alla forza angolare dei giri motore dovevate pesare le bielle indicare con che metallo fatte e comunque la prova vera sarebbe meglio in compressione
@@robertoarezzo4809 please in English?
But you still watching 😂
It's amazing to see the quality of the metals compared to an era it was built. This was cool.
Many screws broke. Furthermore, cars back then had more metal, still didn't last longer. Look at the performance today, a VW TDI makes 600,000 km, back then a Golf Diesel was finished with 150,000 max.
It stays consumer grade crap...
the concept of making business more profitable is not to make parts indestructible, but rather make them fit for purpose, reduce waste of material
weight of each would be interesting to know (although bore/stroke length plays its role). The old BMW fourcylinders are famous for a reason..How about a Volvo red-block fourcylinder test?
Cool experiment. Though rods are more stronger being pushed. Now to compare the old ones, the older rods are more thicker and heavier, but due to today's advancements in metallurgy, we can manufacture smaller and lighter rods that more or less exceeds the strength of the old thicker rods. Perhaps you can try to test it by pushing the rods next time?
they don't make them like they used to
Retro cars were made to last long.
@@Jamirio indeed because no Planned Obsolescence
I wonder if there's a benefit to having weaker bolts. Perhaps under unusual stress a weak bolt takes the deformation rather than the piston rod. So the bolts act as the sacrificial part. Cheaper to fix than replacing the rod. Idk, but in most machinery, if it's going to break, you'd prefer certain parts to break first rather than others.
Once the bolt goes the conrod is going to get jammed up somewhere and most proablly go through the side of the block. Replacing the con rod after that is the least of the owners worries
If one bolt fails, the rod will not ever survive it. Other likely collateral damage often includes block, head, piston, crankshaft, and valves.
It all has to survive, or it can all be "sacrificial parts".
bicycle crank arms - Shimano, SRAM, Raceface
Bike Stems - 31.8 and 35mm
Qual a utilidade de testar tração em uma peça que trabalha com compressão?
WTF 1968 bolt strong like ARP hahaah amazing , and rod well we dont have nothing to say its just 50x overkill for this engine hehehe. Great Video.
What is thist? A bolt strength test?
Honestly, the xtrail really impressed me. Everyone knows BMW engines are tough. But this nissan rod looks pretty weak, but it does the job. Good job, man.
For the people that thinks that the rods are designed to resist only to the compression phase, you are totally wrong, they also have to resist to the cross valve phase after exhaust when there's no compression, the piston pulls the rod upwards with it's inertia while the crankshaft pulls it down with it's cinetic power, this is the moment that they break at high rpm's also breaking the side of the engine block where the rod touches inside the cylinder. Obviously is not the same forces as this hydraulic machine puts on the rods, considering the engine from factory on normal conditions. It's just a simulation that can break the majority of the rods existent on the market.
For instance, on the compression or combustion phases, the rods can bend in case of hydraulic lock on the piston, caused by water of the radiator that can mixture with the engine oil in case of head gasket failure and other reasons.
I knew someone that used to drag race a VW Beetle years ago and he turned so many RPM the rods would stretch till the pistons hit the heads
@@billbailey55 I guess it's dificult to this ocurring to the VW aircooled since it's an over squared engine, also the heads would overheat and crack in the high rpm's before any rods failure but it can happen to any engine, depends on many factors.
Yep. The piston literally stops at dwell
@@billbailey55 Ive seen that spinning a SBC to 10k rpm. Clean spots on the piston tops and heads from the rod stretch.
Гап йук лекн Зур сифатли Темир немис немисда барибир техникалари Зур барибир БМВ матор Зур 👍🇺🇿🇩🇪
Впервые вижу чтобы шатуны работали на растяжение 🤣🤣🤣
🤡
That Nissan rod is amazing. Such a light, low inertia slim design, but yet so strong. Comes to show the level of quality of japanese cars.
- To make test fair, it have to be connecting rods that never have been installed in an engine.
(especially metal fatigue on bolts and Wrist pin end)
* bolts holding crankshaft bearing have to be the same hardening (etc. 8.8)
* connecting rods were stronger and heavier before (Cast iron),
* now they are lighter, not common with cast iron.
(usealy iron steel alloys like 42CrMo4, 43CrMo4, 44csr4, C-70, EN-8D, SAE1141, etc.)
until 1998 it was German steel from Tyssenkrupp from 2000 onwards a lot of steel came from China
The 67' 1500 engine used as was in f1 cars and produced well over 1000bhp with no problems...
Not with these rods.
It would be nice to see the rods strenght in compression as well. In a high Rpm NA enginge, the pulling forces will be the limitating factor of the rods, but in high hp(high torque) it will be the compressing force that limits the rods. Its not as black and white as you can read in all the "expert comments here".
A big trapetzodial shape as the M3 rods have will be the strongest in compressing forces.
M5 ROD is from E60 M5 V10 5.0 not from F90 M5 V8 4.4
I like how the video was done but the thumbnail is misleading. a pressing test would be much more appreciated
That M5 rod says S85 on it. Thats the E60's 5.0L V10. The F90 has the S63TU4, 4.4L Twin Turbo V8.
It's the wrong shape for a start.....
Fake video
I don’t think the videos useless at all. I think it’s highly informational on what cars you definitely should not drive because whether it’s designed to push or pull It shows which ones are weaker and which ones are stronger. Some of these companies are using weaker metals which caused your rod Two break sooner I see a lot now in small engines. I’m replacing a lot of pistons and rods. It’s a great video thing about what you’re driving and give the man props.
Bei dem Auto von 1968 ist die Qualität des Materials eindeutig besser wie bei allen anderen Fahrzeugen!
Rods resist compression very well, and they resist extension much worse. Both of the forces act on the rods and accordingly during engine work, the forces are strong during in compression and weaker for tension.
Reality is that rod is designed in optimal way for both of directions and if the design was good (no exaggerated or inadequate strength in any direction) then usually has equal chance to fail in both of them.
Backwards test. What is the point?
My cat says
Point--> They dont makes cars as tough as they used to anymore!
So impressive and interesting, thanks a million. However, what I noticed is that the rods fail mainly from bolt fracture. I am not sure but the tensile test seems to me that it is stressing the bolt/bolt heads.
Interesting that in most cases the bolts broke. There was one comment about the process of pulling apart but the comment was about compression on the rod. A connecting rod goes through multiple cycles of being under compression and lateral expansion and in between as it changes direction in a 4 cycle engine. Federal Mogul has graft charts showing the rotational stresses on their engine bearings . It’s quite amazing all the different stress put on rods , pistons, crankshafts during each degree on engine rotation. Sometimes I wonder how in the hell they actually stay together in the first place 🤔🤪😂👍
Primary load is gasoline exploding in cylinder. Compression is primary load. The follow though stoke motion has some loading. Testing in non primary load is your choice.
Don't do this at home ? Yes, sure, I have 100 ton press at home :) LMAO
thought everyone has one lol
Thats an interesting test, but you should be testing for compressive force if you want to simulate the stress inside of an engine(torque), but those results give already some idea on how strong they are and if they can rev high.
100ml of water in engine and it's done😋🔥
Interessante saber que a biela que venceu o teste de resistência foi justamente do carro mais antigo.
Apesar de que esses componentes não foram projetados para suportar pressão com vetores em sentidos contrarios da forma como aconteceu no vídeo, assim mesmo é muito interessante.
Okay thumbnail shows compression, but you pulled and the bolts broke. 👎
It would've made more sense to have them fail in compression and use the buckling equation or the shape-effect relationship and the cross section of each rod to compare the actual material strength of each rod
1960's BMW the best material ..very solid string metal 🎉👍👍💪
The BMW M5 connecting rod is from an older (2005-ish) E6x with the S85 V10 engine (written on the con-rod) and not from a 2020 M5.
Car 1963. - 7:30
Lot's of engineers.. Lot's of Comments. This is just another test - tension. These rods are under dynamic loading i.e tension and compression 2000, 5000 cycles per minute. Fatique could be more important than static loading. In addition the connecting rod connects to the piston, so the weight of the piston is really important (especially when high revs and high acceleration at TDC - Top Dead Centre). If combined with the explosion that pushes the piston down (DIFFERENT COMPRESSION RATIOS FOR DIESEL AND PETROL ENGINES) then you understand that there are are many other things to consider (CRANKSHAFT, LUBRIACATION, BEARINGS) as well as momentum (the heavier the rod creates more stress to the whole system) . Therefore this is just one of the tests but the there could be 100s of test to check regarding an engine - which a dynamic system , works at different revs, temperatures, lubrication , compression ratios etc
Need push test 😂
Same test but where those rods are in 45 degree angle against push/pull would be nice!
why not compress them to show the real difference
Seit wann sind Pleuel Zugkräften ausgesetzt?
A mecânica dos carros antigos, sem dúvidas são as melhores, hoje em dia só fabricam lixo
Take a gasoline Hilux with a regular gearbox
The connecting rods didn't fail most of the time, the fasteners holding them together did.
*EVERYONE IN THE COMMENTS SAYING IT NEEDS TO BE IN COMPRESSION* here are the facts:
The rod is naturally MUCH stronger in compression - its the weakest in tension when its trying to throw the piston off the rod at the end of the exhaust / beginning intake stroke at maximum RPM. This is why the diesel rod does so badly - it never has to rev very high, yet it experiences a much higher compression ratio and combustion pressures than the petrol - this is why diesel engines are cast iron.
Quote "The 5.2-liter V10 that debuted in the 2009 Audi R8 has the highest mean piston speed for any production car (26.9 m/s) "
" high speed diesel ~14-17 m/s for automobile engines"
CON RODS main failure is in TENSION, a compression failure usually occurs when hydraulic-ed or when the timing is advanced too much .
Thumbnail: *Compression*
Video: *Depression*
This was a stupid test. The largest loads on a connecting rod are in compression. The rest are much lower inertial loads.
El mayor esfuerzo de la biela es a la compresión, por eso en este ensayo de tracción muchas roturas fueron de los bulones de la tapa de biela.
Were the bolts checked for strength?
Where do the connecting rods work in tension?
Two question why did you photoshoped a compression test photo and did pulling, and why did you do continuation for the rodnwhich didnt break .. it went way behind yung module. The number in not correct for this one.
Yeah this is more of a pulling effect there is a pulling effect and a compression effect on a rod up and down movements on both ends exchange at times... it's push and pull method pretty much... so now the same exact rods should be tested Under Pressure now
My understanding the rod assbly are to work in extension and compression Unlike the pin shackles only work in the extension only This maybe why engines grenade themselves in the exhaust cycle not so much in the compression cycle noted this on a Chrysler 225 slant sixes a very long stroker
im an engineer im eating popcorn right now watching the video and all i can say Bravo !
is it really a conclusive result in the instances where the bolt breaks not the conrod.