1:09:52 I know it’s a locals and all but I think he cheated you here. I was watching it and he shows the judge a Twin Dragon which he can indeed shuffle the materials for it but Twin Dragon only requires 2 materials while Creation King requires 3.
I should’ve looked into it more but I trusted the judge as he’s familiar with the deck. It’s possible it was an illegal play (I wouldn’t call it cheating as that requires intent.) I’ll ask about it and read all the relevant cards next locals so that my opponent can learn for the future.
good call. Yeah he did likely cheat there. The judge asked for a "legal" target, and since he shuffled back 3 from grave, the only legal target he would be able to feasibly show the judge, would have to be a 3rd copy of creation king(because you obviously cannot shuffle back your creation king to then summon out that same creation king lol) . He did indeed show the judge twin dragon, which requires exactly 2 materials, which would not be a legal target since he shuffled back 3. IDK if the memento player has a 3rd creation king in extra though. If he DID, then he's fine. If he DIDNT, then he absolutely 100% cheated .
@@GutsmanLoL He was also new to the deck as is first day using it to prepare himself for the YCS and I know he wouldn’t intentionally cheat so was probably poor communication on all our parts. I do find being able to look part at games and review the plays we make is such a good tool. I made quite a few misplays in this gameplay which shows I still have a lot to learn.
How was the droplet negated in game 1? The guy chose to negate 3 cards, the effect can not be responded to by monster effects, and none left the field, so how was droplet negated?
Since I couldn't respond with monster effects i chained a trap to the droplet, i then chained my Fiendsmith Desirae to my trap card to negate the droplet.
In game 1 was it not an illegal activation of white binder to banish the 3 phantom knight cards in grave? Nothing was linked to white binder and its effect wouldn't of been able to activate because of gryphon unless I'm missing something.
I did at first, decided to swap it out 2 mins before round 1 so had to make up combos on the fly hence why it looks so messy. Chaos angel hadn’t come up until another locals when it was massive against a fiendsmith ryzeal player, it won both games by just being unoutable. They have to make desirae equipped woth agnumday just to push damage through but that still gives you enough turns to grind through all of their resources.
TOP DOWN POV 🔥🔥🔥🔥
1:09:52 I know it’s a locals and all but I think he cheated you here. I was watching it and he shows the judge a Twin Dragon which he can indeed shuffle the materials for it but Twin Dragon only requires 2 materials while Creation King requires 3.
I should’ve looked into it more but I trusted the judge as he’s familiar with the deck.
It’s possible it was an illegal play (I wouldn’t call it cheating as that requires intent.)
I’ll ask about it and read all the relevant cards next locals so that my opponent can learn for the future.
good call. Yeah he did likely cheat there. The judge asked for a "legal" target, and since he shuffled back 3 from grave, the only legal target he would be able to feasibly show the judge, would have to be a 3rd copy of creation king(because you obviously cannot shuffle back your creation king to then summon out that same creation king lol) . He did indeed show the judge twin dragon, which requires exactly 2 materials, which would not be a legal target since he shuffled back 3. IDK if the memento player has a 3rd creation king in extra though. If he DID, then he's fine. If he DIDNT, then he absolutely 100% cheated .
@@GutsmanLoL He was also new to the deck as is first day using it to prepare himself for the YCS and I know he wouldn’t intentionally cheat so was probably poor communication on all our parts.
I do find being able to look part at games and review the plays we make is such a good tool. I made quite a few misplays in this gameplay which shows I still have a lot to learn.
How was the droplet negated in game 1? The guy chose to negate 3 cards, the effect can not be responded to by monster effects, and none left the field, so how was droplet negated?
Since I couldn't respond with monster effects i chained a trap to the droplet, i then chained my Fiendsmith Desirae to my trap card to negate the droplet.
@@pulsargames4166 Smart AF!!!! Damnnnn, I'ma have to do that at the next locals.
In game 1 was it not an illegal activation of white binder to banish the 3 phantom knight cards in grave? Nothing was linked to white binder and its effect wouldn't of been able to activate because of gryphon unless I'm missing something.
Linked means its being pointed to, or its pointing to something.
@@nickyingling6438I thought it had to have an arrow pointed to the monster but I stand corrected
in your previous video, would you use dotscaper and a chessy cat to make the I:P before you switched it out with chaos
Yeah you can do it there or you can do it later, you can use gwc to bring back a non link which also helps get to IP.
Did you miss IP at all? I saw you looked like you wanted it in R1G1
I did at first, decided to swap it out 2 mins before round 1 so had to make up combos on the fly hence why it looks so messy.
Chaos angel hadn’t come up until another locals when it was massive against a fiendsmith ryzeal player, it won both games by just being unoutable.
They have to make desirae equipped woth agnumday just to push damage through but that still gives you enough turns to grind through all of their resources.