Bedrock VS Java RTX Minecraft, Which One is Better?

In this video I will be comparing Minecraft Java and Bedrock RTX to get a good side by side comparison of the two and help you decided which one looks better. Both versions of the game use a texture pack for PBR as you can't even turn on RTX on Bedrock without it and it also works way better on Java. If you couldn't tell, the map used in this video is the TU9 Tutorial World from console edition of the game. Leave a comment bellow which game version you think looked better. Sorry it was such a long wait since my last video, I was really busy and had a huge lack in motivation but I have become motivated again and plan to upload a lot more(hopefully).
SEUS Shaders:www.sonicether...
AVPBR(The Java Edition Texture Pack):www.curseforge...
Vanilla RTX Normals(The Bedrock Edition Texture Pack):www.planetmine...
Map Download(TU9 Tutorial World):www.planetmine...
System Specs:
GPU:NVIDIA RTX 3060
CPU:Intel i7 10750h(Yes this was on a laptop)
Ram:16 gb

[@PIurn]

Give this an update now that we have "betterRTX"

[@CraftieeMinecraftiee]

Java has better ambient occlusion compared to bedrock, but bedrock has better lighting and dynamic range. They're both good but I'll go with bedrock because of the performance.

[@PXKLE]

theres somthing ab bedrock that makes the blocks look a little weird and a little too shiny but it looks good, i think java looks better in a way but idk, they both have something thats better than the other

[@xinyvinny]

probably because the foliage in java has subsurface scattering while bedrock does not

[@duckdavid5688]

They might lok almost the same but when you take a look at the performance bedrock takes the win java doesnt actually use real rtx while bedrock does

[@mistercarr6946]

Awesome Sauce!

[@STUDYINGONLY-s6j]

bedrock player: java rtx looks so cool
java player: pc goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[@secundus6457]

Java player: complementary shaders - reimagined🤩
bedrock player: ..............😭

[@YeszioBoyyGOfficial]

Not working😢

[@aguyfromnorthkorea37]

My opinion bedrock is way better it has way better reflections pbr and its true Rtx java also has something in it i dont wanna offense anyone but bedrock is true rtx

[@raincloudi]

Love this content man

[@Daniel_Morrison23]

Java no tiene Ray Tracing por el simple hecho de que su motor gráfico ni siquiera es compatible con el.

[@AryaXGaming6003]

I like java

[@mistercarrcarr1747]

Epic

[@frivolousphilosophies6930]

Great video mate, also is it just me or is minecraft looking too realistic?

[@lupus206]

Just wait until you see the Ultimate Immersion texture pack

[@zainulrashidnizamhaizal9579]

Why the java is error on the torch

[@Axioma276]

Yeah!

[@katheryngutierrez5086]

cool beans :)

[@DKC-IND]

why not hrr 3??????

[@secundus6457]

Java 'complementary shaders reimagined' look way better.

[@nerx-cf5hz]

on which versi9n you are playing in this video

[@lupus206]

1.19.1 for Java edition and the latest version at the time for Bedrock, 1.19.3 I believe

[@AdolfHitler-f3z]

java rtx are good

[@pol449]

there's no RTX in Java Edition 💀

[@joegaming4077]

@@pol449 shaders use rtx for the lighting

[@ItzMikeplayz]

​@@joegaming4077Lol just look at the lighting in java 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@joegaming4077]

@@ItzMikeplayz i did, anyways even if shaders arent rtx there is a more variety of shaders in java and some of them(in my opinion) look better than the bedrock rtx

[@joegaming4077]

@@ItzMikeplayz disagree with me if you want i really dont care

[@zainulrashidnizamhaizal9579]

Woww bedrock soo cool and softt niceee but java is not soft its like you get a texture pack or a resouse pack
Try on bedrock no texture pack its so smooth

[@hillary7267]

:O

[@videosaintloadingbutiswearif]

bedrock looks better imho

[@lupus206]

Yeah, bedrock caught me off guard by how good it looked in a few areas, definitely better than I thought it would be

[@BaloonPikachu-jn8cl]

No way

[@SamiraBuhtz]

Bedrock looks 100% better

[@zainulrashidnizamhaizal9579]

There's soft resouse bedrock

[@What-519]

Nah I can play that without rtx🙂👍

[@bellepepper2764]

Chicken sandwich

[@pol449]

Shaders are not the same as ray tracing. This comparison is absurd. Furthermore, there is no way for a shader to surpass ray tracing.
Edit: Alright, I admit that I made a mistake in my comment. However, what I meant to say was that RTX (specifically RTX, not Ray Tracing) is not the same as Path Tracing. And I still find the official RTX to be better.

[@aivanosgg2269]

The shader right here uses ray tracing for the lighting, it's simply not optimized for rtx gpu

[@trocoplaytv1254]

When people don't know what they're talking about
Ps. Regardless better rtx is the best path traced minecraft available

[@pol449]

@@trocoplaytv1254 RTX != path tracing != ray tracing

[@CountlessPWNZ]

who said ray tracing?

[@trocoplaytv1254]

@CountlessPWNZ what the hell do you think this video is about? It's about official rtx (nvidia path tracing in this case, in other cases sometimes just ray tracing) vs non nvidia affiliated java ray tracing/path tracing shaders

[@nashmapa2703]

Java rtx is better than bedrock I guess

[@botchedgyal]

nice click bait thumbnail!

[@RUSSIA_STRONG_Z]

dislike

[@ItzMikeplayz]

​@@RUSSIA_STRONG_Zthis kids don't they need a rtx gpu to run rtx shaders lol😂