because he had to face federer and novak, who were better than him on all other surfaces other than clay. if we took federer and novak out of the competition, he will be winning quite a few of those hard fast court titles.
@@kcazzzzz Nadal is only career 50% win rate vs the Top 10 on fast Masters / ATP Finals surfaces. It's not just Djokovic and Federer who could beat him there. (source ulitmate tennis statistics). Vs Top 5 his win rate is only 33%.
@@huzcerhow many you won fool ..he has 22 slams and haters like u say he is slow surface merchant etc..He reached 1 final in paris and 2 finals in atp finals overall ..in Miami he reached 5 finals without winning
I think Nadal’s best chance at winning the ATP Finals was 2020. No Federer, Thiem took down Djokovic. All Nadal needed to do was beat Medvedev, a guy he was beating again and again and again. Nadal choked the SF to Medvedev, ending his best shot (I think he would have beaten Thiem). He got closer in 2010 and 2013, but he was never going to beat an in form Djokovic and Federer indoors. 2020 is the one that got away to me.
Nadal just doesnt win hard court indoors tournament, 2019 ATP Final RR win against medvedev was a fluke and greatest medvedev choke. He won only 1 indoor hard court tournament, that was in 2005. 18 years ago. Indoor hard courts are fast, the ball rebounds faster and lower and flat shots are better in hard courts than topspin.
The ATP finals are bordering on being officially classed as “fast courts” by the official court index, and this year in some of the days it officially was a fast court as it was rated 45+. Nadal is simply not good on fast courts, even Wimbledon when he won probably wasn’t as quick as many of these indoor hard courts. The funny thing is, when people pedal the myth that the supposed “systemic slowing of the courts” (which never ACTUALLY occurred according to CPI) benefits Djokovic the most. Djokovic is literally a beast on true fast courts, we all know how he obliterated his competition this year at the fast ATP finals. It’s actually Nadal who for the vast majority of his career needed a SLOW or medium-slow court to win. Djokovic had no problem winning on slow, Medium-slow, medium, medium-fast, or fast. Nadal’s game is built around slow courts, Djokovic’s works on any of them, but even better on fast.
@@masters.1000 why are you literally spreading misinformation? That’s like me going around saying “actually 2+2=5” The CPI stated that the ATP finals courts were 45+ for both the semifinals and finals this year. That is OFFICIALLY classed as a fast court. Over the past few years, ATP Finals have averaged 40+. In other words, you’re wrong as usual
What a level in 2006, a young Nadal vs Best Federer ever. Federer record that season was 92-5 (2nd best victory record ever after Rod Laver 1969 season and the best victory percentage ever), 4/5 defeats of Federer that year were against a 20-year-old Nadal. Nadal was the only one who could stop the best version of a player ever. What matches delivered those guys back in the day.
The most electrifying sports even you can ever witness is watching playing Rafael Nadal, be a fan or not. No one compares to the level of epicness he transforms the game into.
It’s not like Nadal wasn’t playing bad. Federer and Djokovic were just dominating the ATP finals at the same time. At least, Nadal dominated Roland Garros.
Nadal is simply not good on quick courts. The myth that Djokovic benefited most from the “slowing of the courts” (which by the way there is no proof of) is laughable because Djokovic is actually BETTER on quick courts than slow courts. Djokovic has dominated slow, medium-slow, medium, medium-fast, AND fast courts. 2023 ATP finals semifinals and finals both had a CPI rating of 45+, thus officially making it a fast court. We all know what Novak did in those matches. It’s actually Nadal, not Djokovic who can only win in slow conditions. Who is the player who has never won Shanghai, Paris or ATP finals? Nadal. And these are 3 of the quickest courts on tour. Conversely, Djokovic won all of those several times each.
@@mikemoggerson6651completely true bro, Nadals record of like 60 something of his titles coming on clay out of like 90 shows how much he is reliant on the slower surface
@@mikemoggerson6651djoker benefitted by hardcourts especially because most tournaments are played in hard courts like Australia open ,US Open,Atp finals but rafa has less clay tournaments and roger has less grass tournaments..That's the reason Djokovic still have 5+ titles
@@huzcerdid you watch this video and do you know anything about tennis? What broken backhand? You don’t hold the #1 position in the world for 300+ weeks or win a single slam with a flaw that huge in your game. It simply doesn’t happen. Federer never had any weakness in his game outside of playing Rafa who exploited his single handed backhand with his bazooka lefty forehand. Losing to another GOAT who also plays the game at the highest of levels doesn’t really qualify as a “weakness.” Federer literally destroyed 3+ generations of tennis players and Won 100+ titles. His backhand was nothing short of sublime.
@@prkrmc6457 Then pray tell how did Djokovic win more than a 2 to 1 ratio, 13 to 6 in finals and almost 2 to 1, 11 to 6 in slams vs Federer then? and by the way Federer last won any slam match anywhere against Djokovic when Federer was still only 30, over 10 years before he retired so it was over for Federer long before he was "OLD". Djokovic LOVED Federer's backhand. The 2003-2007 days when the opponents were unseeded Baghdatis or Philapoussis in slam finals or more often Roddick or Hewitt, when Nadal couldn't even make it past a US Open or AO 1/4 final.... they were then gone and under real pressure from a quality player the rally tolerance of Federer on the backhand would often end with 1. the weak backhand opening up space for Djokovic to own the rally, 2. the signature Federer backhand into the tramlines or 3. the Federer shank. Even small children know that Federer's backhand was his weakest and most unreliable shot and cost him as he could never fix it. he was not a complete player.
@@huzcer Stopped reading at Djokovic. My comment ins't about Djokovic. You're claiming Federer has a broken backhand. That's the stupidest nonsense I've heard in a long time given his extraordinary resume, and just shows a complete lack of tennis knowledge and how this game actually works. Anyone with any tennis IQ will reasonably say Federer has one of the most complete backhands in the history of the sport: best backhand slice ever, best block-return of serve of the backhand side ever, one of the best droppers off the backhand ever. He is nearly pulling off EVERY shot in existence in this video off his backhand side. Federer lost to djokovic because Djokovic is the third coming in the GOAT triad. He is the youngest, the best of the 3, and the most complete of the 3 as he should be given he learned from the 2 best ever prior to him. Stop saying nonsense and learn to recognize greatness when you see it. Federer is fucking great as well.
@@huzcer ur djoker is just a psychopath robot waiting for opponents mistake.. his aggression after point is infinity .. aggression in points is 0 No matter how many gs he wins in weakest era against goats Medvedev berettini tsitsipas Ruud rune rublev sinner .. he will always be a robot .. nothing more than that And wtf u comparing h2h .. ur djoker gained upper hand after fed became grandpa who couldn't run .. check stats fed was leading their h2h until 2018😂😂.. and this grandpa who couldn't run beat your goats ass in nitto finals in 2019 and dominated most times in wimby 2019, paris 2018 .. credit to nole, he held nerves in tie breakers as usual.. but grandpa fed almost took down nole ..Don't be a dumb fuck seeing overall h2h 😂.. remember fed was 6 years older and his movements were too slow from 2015 to 16 and then from 2018 mid season to end of his career
Great highlights! It’s a shame Djokovic fans don’t know how to behave in the comments. Cheers to the Federer and Nadal fans that are here enjoying the tennis and not being toxic!
Bullshit, Novak fan here and I enjoyed every single moment. You are the ones that feels constantly bullying for no reason.Besides after Novak my favourite player are Federer and watching him play is mouthwatering experience! 😍
It's the true GOAT era. Nadal was as useful indoor as Anne Frank's drum kit and Federer couldn't win at the ATP finals past even 30. Lost to David "0 big titles" Goffin FFS in the semi in 2017 with the flake Dimitrov waiting in the final FFS 😂 talk about missing right in front of goal!
@@huzcerlmao Fed fans keep talking about this new “weak era” but are silent about Federer and Nadal losing over and over against this supposed “weak era.” They also say the reason why Fed lost to Seppi, Millman, Roanic, Anderson, Tsitsipas, Cilic, and more in grand slams was because he was “old.” Funny how when Djokovic demolishes such competitors at the same age, it becomes a weak era. All I know is, Djokovic at 36 destroyed the world no.2 phenom Alcaraz and peak form world no.4 in 2 consecutive days. Meanwhile, at the same age Fed was losing to David “no titles” Goffin 😭
@@mikemoggerson6651 Well the absolute hypocrisy of the Fed fans didn't fall far from the tree.... Federer spent his whole career chasing slams and milked the hell out of going past Sampras - having Sampras over in the crowd and poncing around in the ridiculously pretentious combo of white blazers and shorts. then when he got to 20 slams he pinned his top tweet about it for over 3 years. But wait, in June 2021, just as Federer was about to lose the slam record he ACTUALLY SAID the following - *"it seems it's all about grand slam titles nowadays and I don't like that"*. you couldn't make it up. I can't think of anything more hypocritical said in sports history. Do you think that if Tom Brady was getting passed by for number of superbowl wins that he will come out with "it seems to be all about superbowl wins nowadays and I don't like that"?! In fact the only people joining in on this gross hypocrisy are Fed "fans" themselves - when Fed was ahead in slams and other records it was all about that but like Fed himself, when he went behind they "didn't like that" and it should be a different measure somehow.... 😂
Just looking at the highlights you can visually see how these indoor courts even got slower and slower, their matches in late 2010s are played on such slow courts my god. Bravo to Roger to adjust his game to still match with this base line maniacs 😂😂
He had problems vs Djokovic and Federer at the year end championships throughout his career. Felt like he underachieved massively at that tournament probably his best chance was 2020 don't remember any other year where he was the outright favourite for the year end championships probably 2013 apart from 2020
The 2006 and 2010 contests were the highest combined levels they showed out of all their year-end championship meetings. Most of the points and highlights in both matches were insane.
Its crazy how slow the courts got, its almost watching a different sport, its shame because their matches in 2006 and 2007 were much better! Shame on the ATP
Nadal missed the end-of-season finals 7 or 8 times in his career. Even in his best times. This is the biggest deficiency in his career. It would be great if he could win just one.
AO2009, 2012, 2014, USO2010, 2013, Wimbledon 2007, 2008 would all like to have a word with you. Meanwhile Nadal is a combined 14-2 against them at RG lol. A more accurate statement would be: “Federer and Djokovic get annihilated by Nadal on clay, but are competitive with him off clay.”
In videos like these you can see that Djokovic’s fanbase is the most direspectful out of all. The hordes come insulting and undermining both Nadal and Federer. It’s pretty sad, honestly.
Resumen del video: El vídeo muestra los partidos históricos de Federer vs Nadal en las Finales de la ATP. Ambos jugadores muestran su habilidad en distintas canchas y situaciones, con puntos emocionantes y momentos claves que definen cada uno de los encuentros. Es un recopilatorio imprescindible para los aficionados del tenis. - 00:00 El jugador está haciendo algunos sonidos mientras practica sus tiros. - 03:35 Federer está tratando de hacer algo brillante en los primeros años. - 07:10 Federer muestra un juego brillante y logra una victoria impresionante contra su oponente. - 10:45 Este fragmento muestra algunos puntos destacados del partido entre Roger Federer y Rafael Nadal en las Finales de la ATP. - 14:20 Federer gana el partido con una excelente actuación y derrota a Nadal en el torneo de fin de temporada. - 17:55 Federer y Nadal se enfrentan en un partido intenso y equilibrado. - 21:30 Esta sección muestra una serie de números enumerados.
I guess you really can't win it all, even for Rafa. Novak's also missing an olympic gold medal in his resume, And for Roger, I guess monte carlo and Rome Masters. But the 3 of them never achieved calendar year grandslam (winning 4 consecutive slams from AO to US in the same year /season as Rod Laver did) With all that said, you can't discredit the other things they have achieved in their respective careers.
can we stop using Rod Laver as any standard? now tennis is on a whole new level, Djokovic is closer to doing it (had 3 gs multiple season) and finals in one, that is way more impressive than calendar slam in Laver's time and nobody cares about olympic gold, it just became standard when Djokovic overthrew nadal and federer in number of big titles. Djokovic is the best and most impressive tennis player of all time by any statistics, 40x masters, have every master, have all gs, 24gs and counting, most weeks at no1,...
Djokovic won the 4 GS in a row, though, on the 3 different surfaces (1st in the Open Era). And Rafa is also missing 3 Masters from the calendar year: Miami, Shanghai and Paris-Bercy (this last one ironically enough).
Djokovic has had a few chances to win the Olympics. Nadal has had 70+ chances to win ATP finals and the 3 masters he has yet to win. Huge difference. Also, Federer never won Olympics in singles.
Except Nadal had *70 plus chances* to win even once one of ATP Finals, Paris Bercy, Shanghai, Miami. Federer had *40 chances* to win Rome or Monte Carlo. Djokovic had *4 chances* to win the Olympics 😂 70, 40, 4
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
Combined? You're stretching a bit there. Y'all act like the head to head between him and them like 24-3 or something. They beat him on enough occasions that they're barely separate. He's been blessed with longevity and their bodies breaking down. Also, the competition he's able to pad his stats against now.
@@Chris-xc4rv Imagine all the efforts in maintaining and honing your body and skills only for someone to call it 'blessed'. Nadal and Federer are 'blessed' with their bodies compared to 99% of the tour, but I don't see any complaints from their fans. Nadal and Federer had his fair share of playing unseeded, wildcards and when Djokovic had his breathing problem.
@@DungxxHen The complaint came from the original poster trying to downplay their accomplishments on a video specifically showcasing these two players. The video has nothing to do with Djokovic, but since the majority of people would rather watch videos about them I guess it makes sense to bring comments about Djokovic to their videos.
@@NLLeFa never winning the ATP Finals, or Miami, or Paris Bercy, or Shanghai. That's never winning more than half (4 of 7) the Big Title hardcourt events on the ATP Tour outside of the slams. 70 plus chances for Nadal to win one of those 4 even once. That's a huge gap of annual events never won.
Nadal never got a ATP finals run where he was in his prime and Fed + Djoker were injured/missing. Whereas Djoker and Fed both won RG in 2016 + 2009 without having to face the other 2 (especially Nadal).
I dont understand, if he was in prime why didnt he won atp final? Djokovic won FO in 2021 with nadal playing while nadal didnt win a single hard surface match against djokovic since 2013
See this is great tennis. Novak just sits in an egg chamber all day and waits for you to make an error. The difference between shot makers and a juiced blood flow.
@@huzcer of course. Secondal and thirderer wont break two tennis rackets in row with foot after loosing a game at age 36. The definition of "great" cannot be applied without cosidering the attitude on and off court.
@@slowdownmovies4474 lol Djokovic breaks a racket twice a year and yet Nadal is so great that he is the the guy picking his bumhole through his shorts with his fingers then putting those same fingers to his nose two seconds later to smell his ass aroma. And doing this on Every Single Point thousands of times a year 😂 what disgusting example is that doing the bumhole scratch and sniffer routine on EVERY POINT of the match 💩 ruclips.net/video/ZXuCngV2-wY/видео.html
@@slowdownmovies4474 as for - Federer spent his whole career chasing slams and milked the hell out of going past Sampras - having Sampras over in the crowd and poncing around in the ridiculously pretentious combo of white blazers and shorts. then when he got to 20 slams he pinned his top tweet about it for over 3 years. But wait, in June 2021, just as Federer was about to lose the slam record he ACTUALLY SAID the following - *"it seems it's all about grand slam titles nowadays and I don't like that"*. you couldn't make it up. I can't think of anything more hypocritical said in sports history. Do you think that if Tom Brady was getting passed by for number of superbowl wins that he will come out with "it seems to be all about superbowl wins nowadays and I don't like that"?! 😂
No. He is 3-1 against Federer at hard court majors and beat Federer at Wimbledon 2008. Federer went 0-6 vs Nadal on clay. Really what it was is Nadal crushes Federer on clay, and they’re about even outside of clay.
@@SJ-di5zu The h2h on grass and hard courts is in Fed's favour and Rafa hasn't beaten Fed away from clay since 2014, that's a long time, while Novak is clearly number one I'm not sure who is number 2, Novak has 7 ATP finals, Fed has 6 and Rafa has zero, it's a coin toss for number 2 behind Novak for me
@@NLLeFa Federer leads by 4 indoor, Nadal leads by one outdoor, Nadal has lost Everything Grass HC indoor HC outdoor since 2014, Roger was better in 2/3 surfaces, you know nothing
By far the biggest gap in Rafa's resume. It is simply impossible to call him the greatest ever with having never won this title even once but Djokovic has made all that talk pretty much redundant now.
Those were the days when novak was sitting in his cave waiting for these players to slow down...he came out of the cave only after weakest young next gen's emerged... roddick at his prime giving more chills to novak sums up his entire career
Retard. Nadal is of same age as djokovic. So wtf are you talking about. And roddick was smart enough to retire before he started getting demolished by prime djokovic.
dude Djokovic was beating 26 year *OLD* Federer at the Australian Open. Federer could never beat Djokovic at the Australian open again. Fed won 1 set TOTAL in 4 matches 😂 Djokovic beats just turned 29 year *OLD* Federer at the US open in 2010. Federer could never beat Djokovic at the US open again. Whenever Djokovic first beat Federer at a slam Federer could never beat Djokovic again.. Federer's last ever slam match win against Djokovic was when Federer was still only 30 😭 Federer was owned at the slams long before he was "OLD". Federer didn't retire for more than another 10 years. Poor Woger had to go through more than a decade of being beaten again and again. No wonder the guy is so completely butt hurt that he can't even find it in him to congratulate Djokovic on his achievements even after Djokovic being the bigger man and turning up to Federer's cry-baby retirement gig!
is this the same weak era where people say Alcaraz is new goat of tennis? Federer dominated young Nole and Nadal, federer didnt win anything important since 2017, Djokovic as 36yo is still beating younger guys while federer was old as soon as 2010 ended. lol
Well yeah better to watch in my opinion. But not better. Potentially as good? I think it's fair to say that peak versions of each one are pretty much neck and neck. I'd logically expect the best player in 2023 to be better than the best player in 2006, the same way Fed is better than Sampras, Sampras better than Connors, etc etc. but that's also partly just the progression of the sport. Like, the current world no. 300 would beat peak Rod Laver, but they obviously aren't as legendary.
thats the fact lol, Djokovic will never get the same love from the world compared to Rafa roger, Imagine being boo in most match show how bad are your attitude.
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
No need to be so disrespectful and pathetic. They’re all three great players. Novak and Rafa are about even. They both are much younger than Federer so they had more time to catch up
@@plush1993 Djokovic having more time to catch up is a very weak logic.Djokovic began his career 8 years later than fed.Yet he has 4 more slams than a retired federer.😂
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
Just a disrespectful statement from a jealous spiteful Novak fan. It’s too bad, he will never have the global appeal as these two and it just burns you up. You can at least be classy and show respect to other players!
@@plush1993hypocrite coming from you. First of all djokovic has alot of fans if you see out of your western bubble. And second, don't dish if you can't take back.
The GOAT RF forever. Alcaraz please come out of your slump and end the Dark Ages. Literally Alcaraz is the only hope. Sinner is nowhere close to versatile enough yet to match the big 3. Rune is gonna fade away when more talented players come. Tsitsipas seems to be depressed half of the year these days. Zverev so inconsistent. No great players like Wawrinka, Del Potro, Thiem left. Even Nadal is gone. Just Dark Ages with a Dark Lord Novak Djokovic.
why wouldn't you be happy to see legend like Nole playing? you ask Alcaraz to overthrow legend, even when it happens Djokovic will be undisputed GOD of tennis. What is your problem?
@@miloraddjurdjic1695 He's just taking advantage of these poor poor youngsters. They are just good players but they stand no chance against a GOAT. Only Alcaraz has reached GOAT level from the current young players. He needs to rise to the challenge or else tennis is in Dark Ages.
@@leelong7934 waking us up because you can't find us in the comments watching Djokovics boring matches? We have preferences, Djokovic not our preference, y'all gotta accept that, his style is so robotic and boring. It's impressive what he's done but it's not entertaining for some reason. This wakes us up, and Djokovic puts us to sleep. In fact, I watch his replays to help me sleep at night. Better than melatonin gummies or NyQuil, all natural.
@@Chris-xc4rv don’t be a sore loser like Nadal or Fed. In professional sports, we must be fair. We don’t play to make an interesting game, we play to win the game. So, we don’t care if our game is boring or not, what we care is winning. And when we lose, we have to accept the truth that we are not as good as the King. We have to bow to the King as he is ruling us. We have no choice, but serve the King!
@@leelong7934 Why can't you serve him in his videos? We minding our business, enjoying timeless matches, reminiscing about better times. And stop that bowing, he's a human, and record are made to be broken. Time will not stop when he retires. And you're right, federer back and knees are sore. And nadals whole body is sore because Djokovic was camping and waiting for them to fall off physically to make his move. Well played Djokovic, well played.
@@arunsekhar9288Novak is a medium defensive player. He is a wall, but he’s not explosive on offense. He thrives when the conditions are medium slow. Courts have slowed down (verifiable by rally length and other measures) so the game has favored his style for some time. Before then, there was more variety in court speed. Winning on multiple surfaces was a much more impressive feat back then. Now the surfaces are more or less homogenous.
@@plush1993 Novak can play with any surface speed indoor hard courts are always fast he has more titles in ATP finals which also played indoors.he can play both aggressive n defence style.
Nadal missed the end-of-season finals 7 or 8 times in his career. Even in his best times. This is the biggest deficiency in his career. It would be great if he could win just one.
![Yeat & Quavo - 5BRAZY [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4XxnTAwyxus/mqdefault.jpg)
2013 was one of Nadal's best seasons and one of Federer's worst seasons, so it makes sense that Nadal would finally beat him that year
@@Laland_1196Any Djokovic version vs Nadal after 2013 is a win😂
@@alanwalts 2017 ?
its semis match not round robin , It has nothing to do with best /worst season
@@Laland_1196 *Djokovic 2015-16 against everybody😂
@@alanwalts because they didn't met many times after that year
Even though I am not a fan of Nadal, very surprised he didn't win the title once.
Cos he is a slow surface merchant. Never won even once in Paris bercy, Shanghai or Miami either
Nadal couldn't win Miami, Paris or Shanghai so its really not surprising. His game is best suited for clay. The rest is a toss up.
because he had to face federer and novak, who were better than him on all other surfaces other than clay. if we took federer and novak out of the competition, he will be winning quite a few of those hard fast court titles.
@@kcazzzzz Nadal is only career 50% win rate vs the Top 10 on fast Masters / ATP Finals surfaces. It's not just Djokovic and Federer who could beat him there. (source ulitmate tennis statistics). Vs Top 5 his win rate is only 33%.
@@huzcerhow many you won fool ..he has 22 slams and haters like u say he is slow surface merchant etc..He reached 1 final in paris and 2 finals in atp finals overall ..in Miami he reached 5 finals without winning
I think Nadal’s best chance at winning the ATP Finals was 2020.
No Federer, Thiem took down Djokovic. All Nadal needed to do was beat Medvedev, a guy he was beating again and again and again.
Nadal choked the SF to Medvedev, ending his best shot (I think he would have beaten Thiem).
He got closer in 2010 and 2013, but he was never going to beat an in form Djokovic and Federer indoors. 2020 is the one that got away to me.
Nadal just doesnt win hard court indoors tournament, 2019 ATP Final RR win against medvedev was a fluke and greatest medvedev choke.
He won only 1 indoor hard court tournament, that was in 2005. 18 years ago.
Indoor hard courts are fast, the ball rebounds faster and lower and flat shots are better in hard courts than topspin.
The ATP finals are bordering on being officially classed as “fast courts” by the official court index, and this year in some of the days it officially was a fast court as it was rated 45+. Nadal is simply not good on fast courts, even Wimbledon when he won probably wasn’t as quick as many of these indoor hard courts. The funny thing is, when people pedal the myth that the supposed “systemic slowing of the courts” (which never ACTUALLY occurred according to CPI) benefits Djokovic the most. Djokovic is literally a beast on true fast courts, we all know how he obliterated his competition this year at the fast ATP finals. It’s actually Nadal who for the vast majority of his career needed a SLOW or medium-slow court to win. Djokovic had no problem winning on slow, Medium-slow, medium, medium-fast, or fast. Nadal’s game is built around slow courts, Djokovic’s works on any of them, but even better on fast.
No if if if
@@mikemoggerson6651 Djokovic never played on fast courts, and the ATP Finals usually were on the 35 speed order.
@@masters.1000 why are you literally spreading misinformation? That’s like me going around saying “actually 2+2=5”
The CPI stated that the ATP finals courts were 45+ for both the semifinals and finals this year. That is OFFICIALLY classed as a fast court.
Over the past few years, ATP Finals have averaged 40+. In other words, you’re wrong as usual
What a level in 2006, a young Nadal vs Best Federer ever. Federer record that season was 92-5 (2nd best victory record ever after Rod Laver 1969 season and the best victory percentage ever), 4/5 defeats of Federer that year were against a 20-year-old Nadal. Nadal was the only one who could stop the best version of a player ever. What matches delivered those guys back in the day.
Their matches were of high quality every time! While I am no fan of Nadal, I do respect his fighting spirit.
The most electrifying sports even you can ever witness is watching playing Rafael Nadal, be a fan or not. No one compares to the level of epicness he transforms the game into.
All I see is Federer dictating and actually successful in executing because of the condition. Don't really think Nadal was on the same level though.
Swiss maestro was absolute beast on hard court in his prime.
lol he is not, he got demolished by the GOAT Novak...
@@MobbieKeysLOL not even close. Peak Fed on hardcourt (and grass obviously) >>>>>> any version of Joke
in Roger's prime......
@@initialize212019? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@initialize21keep posting Ur copy pasta loser
It’s not like Nadal wasn’t playing bad. Federer and Djokovic were just dominating the ATP finals at the same time. At least, Nadal dominated Roland Garros.
1 indoor title total in 20 years on the tour?
Nadal was about as much use on indoor as Anne Frank's drum kit.
Nadal is simply not good on quick courts. The myth that Djokovic benefited most from the “slowing of the courts” (which by the way there is no proof of) is laughable because Djokovic is actually BETTER on quick courts than slow courts. Djokovic has dominated slow, medium-slow, medium, medium-fast, AND fast courts. 2023 ATP finals semifinals and finals both had a CPI rating of 45+, thus officially making it a fast court. We all know what Novak did in those matches. It’s actually Nadal, not Djokovic who can only win in slow conditions. Who is the player who has never won Shanghai, Paris or ATP finals? Nadal. And these are 3 of the quickest courts on tour. Conversely, Djokovic won all of those several times each.
@@mikemoggerson6651completely true bro, Nadals record of like 60 something of his titles coming on clay out of like 90 shows how much he is reliant on the slower surface
Nadal spin too much
@@mikemoggerson6651djoker benefitted by hardcourts especially because most tournaments are played in hard courts like Australia open ,US Open,Atp finals but rafa has less clay tournaments and roger has less grass tournaments..That's the reason Djokovic still have 5+ titles
Nadal and Djokovic are great players, but Federer had incredible footwork, he is like a tennis ballet dancer on the court.
Ballerina with the broken back(hand)
@@huzcerdid you watch this video and do you know anything about tennis? What broken backhand? You don’t hold the #1 position in the world for 300+ weeks or win a single slam with a flaw that huge in your game. It simply doesn’t happen. Federer never had any weakness in his game outside of playing Rafa who exploited his single handed backhand with his bazooka lefty forehand.
Losing to another GOAT who also plays the game at the highest of levels doesn’t really qualify as a “weakness.”
Federer literally destroyed 3+ generations of tennis players and Won 100+ titles. His backhand was nothing short of sublime.
@@prkrmc6457 Then pray tell how did Djokovic win more than a 2 to 1 ratio, 13 to 6 in finals and almost 2 to 1, 11 to 6 in slams vs Federer then? and by the way Federer last won any slam match anywhere against Djokovic when Federer was still only 30, over 10 years before he retired so it was over for Federer long before he was "OLD". Djokovic LOVED Federer's backhand. The 2003-2007 days when the opponents were unseeded Baghdatis or Philapoussis in slam finals or more often Roddick or Hewitt, when Nadal couldn't even make it past a US Open or AO 1/4 final.... they were then gone and under real pressure from a quality player the rally tolerance of Federer on the backhand would often end with 1. the weak backhand opening up space for Djokovic to own the rally, 2. the signature Federer backhand into the tramlines or 3. the Federer shank. Even small children know that Federer's backhand was his weakest and most unreliable shot and cost him as he could never fix it. he was not a complete player.
@@huzcer Stopped reading at Djokovic. My comment ins't about Djokovic.
You're claiming Federer has a broken backhand. That's the stupidest nonsense I've heard in a long time given his extraordinary resume, and just shows a complete lack of tennis knowledge and how this game actually works. Anyone with any tennis IQ will reasonably say Federer has one of the most complete backhands in the history of the sport: best backhand slice ever, best block-return of serve of the backhand side ever, one of the best droppers off the backhand ever. He is nearly pulling off EVERY shot in existence in this video off his backhand side. Federer lost to djokovic because Djokovic is the third coming in the GOAT triad. He is the youngest, the best of the 3, and the most complete of the 3 as he should be given he learned from the 2 best ever prior to him.
Stop saying nonsense and learn to recognize greatness when you see it. Federer is fucking great as well.
@@huzcer ur djoker is just a psychopath robot waiting for opponents mistake.. his aggression after point is infinity .. aggression in points is 0
No matter how many gs he wins in weakest era against goats Medvedev berettini tsitsipas Ruud rune rublev sinner .. he will always be a robot .. nothing more than that
And wtf u comparing h2h .. ur djoker gained upper hand after fed became grandpa who couldn't run .. check stats fed was leading their h2h until 2018😂😂.. and this grandpa who couldn't run beat your goats ass in nitto finals in 2019 and dominated most times in wimby 2019, paris 2018 .. credit to nole, he held nerves in tie breakers as usual.. but grandpa fed almost took down nole ..Don't be a dumb fuck seeing overall h2h 😂.. remember fed was 6 years older and his movements were too slow from 2015 to 16 and then from 2018 mid season to end of his career
Great highlights! It’s a shame Djokovic fans don’t know how to behave in the comments. Cheers to the Federer and Nadal fans that are here enjoying the tennis and not being toxic!
It's fine, this is a part of growing up to learn how to behave respectfully towards great players, they'll learn that eventually
Bullshit, Novak fan here and I enjoyed every single moment. You are the ones that feels constantly bullying for no reason.Besides after Novak my favourite player are Federer and watching him play is mouthwatering experience! 😍
It's the true GOAT era. Nadal was as useful indoor as Anne Frank's drum kit and Federer couldn't win at the ATP finals past even 30. Lost to David "0 big titles" Goffin FFS in the semi in 2017 with the flake Dimitrov waiting in the final FFS 😂 talk about missing right in front of goal!
@@huzcerlmao Fed fans keep talking about this new “weak era” but are silent about Federer and Nadal losing over and over against this supposed “weak era.” They also say the reason why Fed lost to Seppi, Millman, Roanic, Anderson, Tsitsipas, Cilic, and more in grand slams was because he was “old.” Funny how when Djokovic demolishes such competitors at the same age, it becomes a weak era. All I know is, Djokovic at 36 destroyed the world no.2 phenom Alcaraz and peak form world no.4 in 2 consecutive days. Meanwhile, at the same age Fed was losing to David “no titles” Goffin 😭
@@mikemoggerson6651 Well the absolute hypocrisy of the Fed fans didn't fall far from the tree.... Federer spent his whole career chasing slams and milked the hell out of going past Sampras - having Sampras over in the crowd and poncing around in the ridiculously pretentious combo of white blazers and shorts. then when he got to 20 slams he pinned his top tweet about it for over 3 years. But wait, in June 2021, just as Federer was about to lose the slam record he ACTUALLY SAID the following - *"it seems it's all about grand slam titles nowadays and I don't like that"*. you couldn't make it up. I can't think of anything more hypocritical said in sports history. Do you think that if Tom Brady was getting passed by for number of superbowl wins that he will come out with "it seems to be all about superbowl wins nowadays and I don't like that"?! In fact the only people joining in on this gross hypocrisy are Fed "fans" themselves - when Fed was ahead in slams and other records it was all about that but like Fed himself, when he went behind they "didn't like that" and it should be a different measure somehow.... 😂
Just looking at the highlights you can visually see how these indoor courts even got slower and slower, their matches in late 2010s are played on such slow courts my god.
Bravo to Roger to adjust his game to still match with this base line maniacs 😂😂
its actually crazy to watch these highlights its almost the 2006 and 2007 matches are not on the same surface as the one in 2013.
Federer is 5-0 against both Nadal and Djokovic in Shanghai 👌🔥
God of fast HC & indoors.
God of ATP 250 he got 25 titles
Djokovic 28 wins, Federer 23 😂😂😂😂
@@fg92626who cares a title is a tile. 99% of all professional tennis players never win anything
@@prkrmc6457 how can one be the god of indoor HC if he has a 0:3 record against Djokovic in WTF finals?
@@PaulAtreidees most of those wins came against federer when he was in his 30s
it was so long ago and i am still rooting for federer like i was back then.
They always are the best!!
I like the pat on the back they gave each other
That's what makes the games more lovely and how are you doing over there
He had problems vs Djokovic and Federer at the year end championships throughout his career. Felt like he underachieved massively at that tournament probably his best chance was 2020 don't remember any other year where he was the outright favourite for the year end championships probably 2013 apart from 2020
The 2006 match was so, so good. Federer was at his very best that year and he played super well to beat Nadal
2007 and 2011 looked so easy for Roger. I love how Roger remains quiet even when he wins the first set.
The 2006 and 2010 contests were the highest combined levels they showed out of all their year-end championship meetings. Most of the points and highlights in both matches were insane.
That 06 match was outrageous level
Nadal not winning the atp finals, is the most nadal thing ever.
Best comment
Djokovic not winning the olympic gold medal is the most Djokovic thing ever
@@NLLeFa Djokovic had 4 tries winning it. Nadal had over 15 tries winning the atp finals. Massive difference
@@NLLeFags>>>>>>> 100x oylimpic go home dopdal fan
@NLLeFa my idol drugdal is finished sadly
GODS.
Glad nadal lost
was shanghai outdor or indoor?
Outdoor I guess
Yess just what I wanted !
Its crazy how slow the courts got, its almost watching a different sport, its shame because their matches in 2006 and 2007 were much better! Shame on the ATP
5:25 remember this shot till then! 😍
No one could beat Federer in 2006 except Djokovic.... Outside clay of course
Le point à 2:47 est juste imaginaire
2006 match.. wow
Nadal has Lost 7 finals in 2011: Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, Roma, Wimbledon, US Open and Tokio
Nadal missed the end-of-season finals 7 or 8 times in his career. Even in his best times. This is the biggest deficiency in his career. It would be great if he could win just one.
Try next time without tears😢
and why did he miss it? is it funny that he missed everything except for RG? he miss what he cant win
He missed because he is not good on indoor hard courts.
Nadal gets crushed by both Federer and Djokovic off clay.
At least he still beat them multiple times on grass and hardcourt in his prime.
AO2009, 2012, 2014, USO2010, 2013, Wimbledon 2007, 2008 would all like to have a word with you.
Meanwhile Nadal is a combined 14-2 against them at RG lol. A more accurate statement would be: “Federer and Djokovic get annihilated by Nadal on clay, but are competitive with him off clay.”
@@SJ-di5zu Nadal posed zero (0) risk outside clay in the last decade.
@@SJ-di5zu You forgot the parts where he was losing to journeymen, let alone Fed or Djo.
In videos like these you can see that Djokovic’s fanbase is the most direspectful out of all. The hordes come insulting and undermining both Nadal and Federer. It’s pretty sad, honestly.
Resumen del video:
El vídeo muestra los partidos históricos de Federer vs Nadal en las Finales de la ATP. Ambos jugadores muestran su habilidad en distintas canchas y situaciones, con puntos emocionantes y momentos claves que definen cada uno de los encuentros. Es un recopilatorio imprescindible para los aficionados del tenis.
- 00:00 El jugador está haciendo algunos sonidos mientras practica sus tiros.
- 03:35 Federer está tratando de hacer algo brillante en los primeros años.
- 07:10 Federer muestra un juego brillante y logra una victoria impresionante contra su oponente.
- 10:45 Este fragmento muestra algunos puntos destacados del partido entre Roger Federer y Rafael Nadal en las Finales de la ATP.
- 14:20 Federer gana el partido con una excelente actuación y derrota a Nadal en el torneo de fin de temporada.
- 17:55 Federer y Nadal se enfrentan en un partido intenso y equilibrado.
- 21:30 Esta sección muestra una serie de números enumerados.
WE Want to see the matchs From Goat Djokovic Not 2 retired players
You're spitting some facts here
The thumbnail said it all, why you here? He made a video for Djokovic 2 days ago, go watch it again.
I guess you really can't win it all, even for Rafa.
Novak's also missing an olympic gold medal in his resume,
And for Roger, I guess monte carlo and Rome Masters.
But the 3 of them never achieved calendar year grandslam (winning 4 consecutive slams from AO to US in the same year /season as Rod Laver did)
With all that said, you can't discredit the other things they have achieved in their respective careers.
can we stop using Rod Laver as any standard? now tennis is on a whole new level, Djokovic is closer to doing it (had 3 gs multiple season) and finals in one, that is way more impressive than calendar slam in Laver's time and nobody cares about olympic gold, it just became standard when Djokovic overthrew nadal and federer in number of big titles. Djokovic is the best and most impressive tennis player of all time by any statistics, 40x masters, have every master, have all gs, 24gs and counting, most weeks at no1,...
Djokovic won the 4 GS in a row, though, on the 3 different surfaces (1st in the Open Era). And Rafa is also missing 3 Masters from the calendar year: Miami, Shanghai and Paris-Bercy (this last one ironically enough).
Djokovic has had a few chances to win the Olympics. Nadal has had 70+ chances to win ATP finals and the 3 masters he has yet to win. Huge difference. Also, Federer never won Olympics in singles.
He didnt won them in a row , he held them at the same time. There is a difference. But still an incredible achievement.@@SuperSENSO.
Except Nadal had *70 plus chances* to win even once one of ATP Finals, Paris Bercy, Shanghai, Miami. Federer had *40 chances* to win Rome or Monte Carlo. Djokovic had *4 chances* to win the Olympics 😂 70, 40, 4
Not sure what's the relevance of posting this just after a few days Nole won. 🤔
Forehand: Federer
Backhand: Joke
Serve: Federer
Overhead: Federer x 1000
Slice: Federer
Volley: Federer
Dropshot: Federer
Genius shots: Federer
all that just to lose to Novak Djokovic.@@initialize21
In case anyone wanted to watch some entertaining players play
Yes, Nole is king, these two are finished.
That final sucked bro, that's why.
PEAK Federer backhand at 10:57
This level Federer is better than any level Djokovic
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
Where did he ever say this lol
@@plush1993 source: trust me bro
@@plush1993he pulled out of his ass.
Where did he Say that? I'm the biggest Davydenko fan , haven't hear that from him ? I doubt a person like Nikolay would use the word cringy
Source: Frauderer's 24th Grand Slam 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
DJOKO is better than these two combined! He is the GOAT, the best ever athlete!
yes Djokovic is the player in TITLE but he will be never get the love with the same level compare to Rafa, Federer, simple as that
@@hungngo96 Đoković always was a "third wheel" when compared to Rafa and Roger. We can say for Novak- patience pays!
Combined? You're stretching a bit there. Y'all act like the head to head between him and them like 24-3 or something. They beat him on enough occasions that they're barely separate. He's been blessed with longevity and their bodies breaking down. Also, the competition he's able to pad his stats against now.
@@Chris-xc4rv Imagine all the efforts in maintaining and honing your body and skills only for someone to call it 'blessed'. Nadal and Federer are 'blessed' with their bodies compared to 99% of the tour, but I don't see any complaints from their fans. Nadal and Federer had his fair share of playing unseeded, wildcards and when Djokovic had his breathing problem.
@@DungxxHen The complaint came from the original poster trying to downplay their accomplishments on a video specifically showcasing these two players. The video has nothing to do with Djokovic, but since the majority of people would rather watch videos about them I guess it makes sense to bring comments about Djokovic to their videos.
How can one be one in the GOAT conversation if not good enough to win WTF?
The same way when one can be in the goat conversation when winning RG vs Soderling or not winning the olympic gold medal. It's relative.
@@NLLeFa never winning the ATP Finals, or Miami, or Paris Bercy, or Shanghai. That's never winning more than half (4 of 7) the Big Title hardcourt events on the ATP Tour outside of the slams. 70 plus chances for Nadal to win one of those 4 even once. That's a huge gap of annual events never won.
@@NLLeFa how can be ATP500 titles (like olympic gold) in the GOAT conversation?
@@huzcer I think that Nadal won Shanghai and that Paris and Miami are the only Masters he's missing.
@@FearsomeVoid he never won in Shanghai. Shanghai is outdoors. Nadal had 1 win in Madrid indoor in 2005. So no Shanghai
Nadal never got a ATP finals run where he was in his prime and Fed + Djoker were injured/missing. Whereas Djoker and Fed both won RG in 2016 + 2009 without having to face the other 2 (especially Nadal).
1 indoor title total in 20 years on the tour?
Nadal was about as much use on indoor as Anne Frank's drum kit.
I dont understand, if he was in prime why didnt he won atp final? Djokovic won FO in 2021 with nadal playing while nadal didnt win a single hard surface match against djokovic since 2013
Nadal had the opportunity to win the ATP finals without facing Djokovic and Federer in 2019 and 2020, but he bottled it.
@@miloraddjurdjic1695 i dont understand " since 2013 " is this tennis begin this time ?
It is good to see No.2 and No.3 fighting it hard. Undisputed GOAT Djokovic watching the Big 2 on his throne
Forehand: Federer
Backhand: Joke
Serve: Federer
Overhead: Federer x 1000
Slice: Federer
Volley: Federer
Dropshot: Federer
Genius shots: Federer
@@initialize21 and game, set, match, grandslam - Mr. Djokovic 😂😂
@@JosephDTin the weakest era of all time, if that makes you feel better 😅😂
Djokovic fans are everywhere, especially talking shit when it's not the point.
Bunch of idiots
And somehow I can't see you guys in any stadium lmao, love the warrior support on RUclips where it doesn't matter 😂
This was a one-sided affair
See this is great tennis. Novak just sits in an egg chamber all day and waits for you to make an error. The difference between shot makers and a juiced blood flow.
Djokovic won more WTF titles than these two together.
These two?
@@slowdownmovies4474 than Secondal and Thirderer
@@huzcer of course. Secondal and thirderer wont break two tennis rackets in row with foot after loosing a game at age 36. The definition of "great" cannot be applied without cosidering the attitude on and off court.
@@slowdownmovies4474 lol Djokovic breaks a racket twice a year and yet Nadal is so great that he is the the guy picking his bumhole through his shorts with his fingers then putting those same fingers to his nose two seconds later to smell his ass aroma. And doing this on Every Single Point thousands of times a year 😂 what disgusting example is that doing the bumhole scratch and sniffer routine on EVERY POINT of the match 💩 ruclips.net/video/ZXuCngV2-wY/видео.html
@@slowdownmovies4474 as for - Federer spent his whole career chasing slams and milked the hell out of going past Sampras - having Sampras over in the crowd and poncing around in the ridiculously pretentious combo of white blazers and shorts. then when he got to 20 slams he pinned his top tweet about it for over 3 years. But wait, in June 2021, just as Federer was about to lose the slam record he ACTUALLY SAID the following - *"it seems it's all about grand slam titles nowadays and I don't like that"*. you couldn't make it up. I can't think of anything more hypocritical said in sports history. Do you think that if Tom Brady was getting passed by for number of superbowl wins that he will come out with "it seems to be all about superbowl wins nowadays and I don't like that"?! 😂
You(Rafa fans, Roger fans and others) may not love Djokovic, but don't downgrade his(GOAT) results by low iq reasons.
Prime Nadal only beats Prime Fed on clay
No. He is 3-1 against Federer at hard court majors and beat Federer at Wimbledon 2008. Federer went 0-6 vs Nadal on clay. Really what it was is Nadal crushes Federer on clay, and they’re about even outside of clay.
@@SJ-di5zu The h2h on grass and hard courts is in Fed's favour and Rafa hasn't beaten Fed away from clay since 2014, that's a long time, while Novak is clearly number one I'm not sure who is number 2, Novak has 7 ATP finals, Fed has 6 and Rafa has zero, it's a coin toss for number 2 behind Novak for me
Nadal leads the outdoor hard court h2h vs Federer so you know nothing. Federer is better on indoor hard and grass.
@@NLLeFa Federer leads by 4 indoor, Nadal leads by one outdoor, Nadal has lost Everything Grass HC indoor HC outdoor since 2014, Roger was better in 2/3 surfaces, you know nothing
By far the biggest gap in Rafa's resume. It is simply impossible to call him the greatest ever with having never won this title even once but Djokovic has made all that talk pretty much redundant now.
Those were the days when novak was sitting in his cave waiting for these players to slow down...he came out of the cave only after weakest young next gen's emerged... roddick at his prime giving more chills to novak sums up his entire career
Retard.
Nadal is of same age as djokovic. So wtf are you talking about. And roddick was smart enough to retire before he started getting demolished by prime djokovic.
Cope
dude Djokovic was beating 26 year *OLD* Federer at the Australian Open. Federer could never beat Djokovic at the Australian open again. Fed won 1 set TOTAL in 4 matches 😂 Djokovic beats just turned 29 year *OLD* Federer at the US open in 2010. Federer could never beat Djokovic at the US open again. Whenever Djokovic first beat Federer at a slam Federer could never beat Djokovic again.. Federer's last ever slam match win against Djokovic was when Federer was still only 30 😭 Federer was owned at the slams long before he was "OLD". Federer didn't retire for more than another 10 years. Poor Woger had to go through more than a decade of being beaten again and again. No wonder the guy is so completely butt hurt that he can't even find it in him to congratulate Djokovic on his achievements even after Djokovic being the bigger man and turning up to Federer's cry-baby retirement gig!
is this the same weak era where people say Alcaraz is new goat of tennis? Federer dominated young Nole and Nadal, federer didnt win anything important since 2017, Djokovic as 36yo is still beating younger guys while federer was old as soon as 2010 ended. lol
@@miloraddjurdjic1695 Fed actually didn't dominate young Rafa at all. Rafa won 7 of their first 10 meetings for example.
I love how TennisTV rubs NADAL and FEDERER dodging very carefully the DJOKER lol. I quite like it
What ?
Sorry, but these two are better than Djokovic, no matter how many titles he wins.
u have no argument left lmao
how so?
Well yeah better to watch in my opinion. But not better. Potentially as good? I think it's fair to say that peak versions of each one are pretty much neck and neck. I'd logically expect the best player in 2023 to be better than the best player in 2006, the same way Fed is better than Sampras, Sampras better than Connors, etc etc. but that's also partly just the progression of the sport. Like, the current world no. 300 would beat peak Rod Laver, but they obviously aren't as legendary.
True, at least they don’t have shit fanbases like Djokovic does lol
thats the fact lol, Djokovic will never get the same love from the world compared to Rafa roger, Imagine being boo in most match show how bad are your attitude.
La leggenda narrata degli uomini straordinari
È finita fra le mandibole di Novak Djokovic
Tutti a cuccia e muti!
Federer 4 - 1 Nadal
Novak's children xd
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
No need to be so disrespectful and pathetic. They’re all three great players. Novak and Rafa are about even. They both are much younger than Federer so they had more time to catch up
@@plush1993how are they even😂😂😂
@@initialize21cry😢
@@plush1993 Djokovic having more time to catch up is a very weak logic.Djokovic began his career 8 years later than fed.Yet he has 4 more slams than a retired federer.😂
Показать больше нечего похоже!!!??🤣🥎🤣
He paid the organizers 300 million to slow down the courts but it still wasnt enough😢
Tennis TV Rafa Nadal lap dog 😂.....you forgot to show how they beat djokovic and won all Grand Slams 😂
You know Djokovic has broken another Fedal record if a video like this pops up 😜
Federer and Nadal looking at each other like: Who the GOAT? You the GOAT
Now they are Secondal and Thirderer 😁
@@huzcer sorry but they are not in the top 3
👍👍👍😉👏👏👏👍
Weak era player vs claydal
"Not only do these players today lack a spine, but they're error-prone machines, which is why I'm not entirely impressed with Novak's records. That's why these people who only look at "stats" I find cringy. For the juniors I train, none of them want to play like Djokovic. They all want to play like Federer." -Nikolay Davydenko
Just a disrespectful statement from a jealous spiteful Novak fan. It’s too bad, he will never have the global appeal as these two and it just burns you up. You can at least be classy and show respect to other players!
Don't be insecure.
@@plush1993hypocrite coming from you. First of all djokovic has alot of fans if you see out of your western bubble. And second, don't dish if you can't take back.
@@plush1993 Jealous of what? Djokovic has left these two has-beens in the weeds 😁
Ya fue...
Basta!!!
The GOAT RF forever. Alcaraz please come out of your slump and end the Dark Ages. Literally Alcaraz is the only hope. Sinner is nowhere close to versatile enough yet to match the big 3. Rune is gonna fade away when more talented players come. Tsitsipas seems to be depressed half of the year these days. Zverev so inconsistent. No great players like Wawrinka, Del Potro, Thiem left. Even Nadal is gone. Just Dark Ages with a Dark Lord Novak Djokovic.
Don't fear the GOAT. Savour him.
why wouldn't you be happy to see legend like Nole playing? you ask Alcaraz to overthrow legend, even when it happens Djokovic will be undisputed GOD of tennis. What is your problem?
@@huzcer I do not fear the GOAT. Unfortunately he retired.
@@miloraddjurdjic1695 He's just taking advantage of these poor poor youngsters. They are just good players but they stand no chance against a GOAT. Only Alcaraz has reached GOAT level from the current young players. He needs to rise to the challenge or else tennis is in Dark Ages.
@@spiritlance364 Thirderer retired. The GOAT is number 1 in the world 😂
So boring with these two mediocre players
Yet you're here watching.
@@Chris-xc4rv wrong, I was here to wake the people up. Stop watching nonsense things, people! Bow to the King!
@@leelong7934 waking us up because you can't find us in the comments watching Djokovics boring matches? We have preferences, Djokovic not our preference, y'all gotta accept that, his style is so robotic and boring. It's impressive what he's done but it's not entertaining for some reason. This wakes us up, and Djokovic puts us to sleep. In fact, I watch his replays to help me sleep at night. Better than melatonin gummies or NyQuil, all natural.
@@Chris-xc4rv don’t be a sore loser like Nadal or Fed. In professional sports, we must be fair. We don’t play to make an interesting game, we play to win the game. So, we don’t care if our game is boring or not, what we care is winning. And when we lose, we have to accept the truth that we are not as good as the King. We have to bow to the King as he is ruling us. We have no choice, but serve the King!
@@leelong7934 Why can't you serve him in his videos? We minding our business, enjoying timeless matches, reminiscing about better times. And stop that bowing, he's a human, and record are made to be broken. Time will not stop when he retires. And you're right, federer back and knees are sore. And nadals whole body is sore because Djokovic was camping and waiting for them to fall off physically to make his move. Well played Djokovic, well played.
Novak Djokovic doesn't have this quality level of tennis inside or outside of the courts! he's below average compare to RF & RN
He is after all a WTA GOAT...
Novak's quality is much better than this 👍.
@@arunsekhar9288Novak is a medium defensive player. He is a wall, but he’s not explosive on offense. He thrives when the conditions are medium slow. Courts have slowed down (verifiable by rally length and other measures) so the game has favored his style for some time. Before then, there was more variety in court speed. Winning on multiple surfaces was a much more impressive feat back then. Now the surfaces are more or less homogenous.
@@plush1993 Novak can play with any surface speed indoor hard courts are always fast he has more titles in ATP finals which also played indoors.he can play both aggressive n defence style.
@@plush1993lmao you just described nadal. Dude has so much success on clay because it's a slow surface.
Just look at Federer in 2006...
"Djokovic is the Goat" people are just GEEKS
Djokovis vs Federer in WTF finals 3:0 what is your point?
Real GOATs
Nadal missed the end-of-season finals 7 or 8 times in his career. Even in his best times. This is the biggest deficiency in his career. It would be great if he could win just one.
He still has the record for most appearances without ever winning once. That's a record that he will keep forever