From this video one could think that Russia conquered Crimea just to get access to the Black sea, however the author didn't mention that the south of Russia had suffered from raids of the Crimean Tatars for decades before the annexation of the Crimea. Thousands of people had been captured and sold to the Ottoman Empire and countless villages and towns had been burnt in those raids. So, defeating the Crimean Khanate was not only the matter of expansion but also the matter of securing the southern borders
I'm Russian and I confirm that! Absolutely true! Thank you, stranger :) Anyway, it doesn't have any influence on the current political events. That's just the history.
I had read it was over hundreds of years and millions of slavs had been sold as slaves through the Muslim world.. it was referred to as the culling of the steppes? I could be way off, I read about it probably 2 decades ago.
@@davidsaidov8308 The problem today, is that the US is uncapable to compete in an open world. Their greed to be the leaders of the world by force and sadly to have a precident that sufers from dementia.
@@migueluribe4249 Yes Biden is a complete JOKE .. The US Mainstream media covers for him He is a controlled puppet president very sad and disturbing situation here
@@Kyle-lx7xo That's where you get the word Slave from the Slavic people Slavs. They were also slaves for many other countries for hundreds of years not just Muslim ones but you are correct
@Dr. Doofenshmirtz the guys isnt joking. dont try to make an excuse for it. people actually believe youtube videos teach them more then years in school
this video has so much detail in only 22 minutes it feels like an hour, it's breathtaking.... the russian perspective really helps me understand europe more
The video is very superficial. The events are simply listed, and the author does not answer questions about the connection between these events and the needs of Russia. About Ivan the Terrible - nothing at all, except that he was paranoid. Is the author a psychiatrist to diagnose? And the nickname itself - Ivan the Terrible is wrong. His nickname is closer to Thunderstorm, not horror. It is not said why he fought with the feudal lords. It is not said about the military, judicial and other reforms that strengthened Russia. Even the version that Ivan killed his son is only a version that has no evidence, but some present it as a fact. So those who want to know the history should not take such videos as a textbook.
@@evelynantonio4462 Interesting these historical stories on the internet are so valuable. I study WW2, the Third Reich, the Nazis, the technology developed during that war is poorly covered in school. I was fascinated by WW2 during two days in history class where we saw two films (as in real films shown on a projector) about WW2. Reading books by Joseph P. Farrell, for example, and all the videos on WW2 and Hitler really bring reality to recent 19th and 20th century history.
Russia, the only country to have rivalries with Germany, Iran, Sweden, the Ottomans, China, Poland, France, and Japan. Normally, those countries would have nothing to do with each other, but they all had issues with Russia at some point.
Every country has had issues with another country at some point, its ridiculous to say that Russia is rival to all of these countries just because they were at conflict at some point in their thousand year existence
I did not mention the wars with the Khazar Khaganate, Byzantium, the Golden Horde, Lithuania, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Livonian Order, the Kazan and Crimean Khanate and the main enemy Great Britain.
“With the Russian Empire teetering on the brink of collapse, the tsarist regime responded to the crises with its usual incompetence and obstinacy. The basic problem was that Nicholas himself remained totally oblivious to the extremity of the situation. While the country sank deeper into chaos he continued to fill his diary with terse and trivial notes on the weather, the company at tea and the number of birds he had shot that day. When Bulygin suggested that political concessions might be needed to calm the country, Nicholas was taken aback and told the Minister: 'One would think you are afraid a revolution will break out.' 'Your majesty,' came the reply, 'the revolution has already begun.” ― Orlando Figes,
4:36 Peter the Great admiring and wanting to emulate the Dutch Republic provides one possible explanation why the Russian tricolor flag is (apparently) based on the Dutch
When France became a republic they also adapted the Dutch flag by turning it on its side... although the French never admitted they did that and pretended they came up with their tricolour on their own.
It's not really like this. Despite really unclear early history of Russian flag red, blue and white was a main colors of Russian flag at least since 1667-1668 when father of Peter The Great still was the ruler of Russia. The first documented moment of this three colors being in use refers to the first Russian navy ship called Oryol (Eagle) which was built in 1667 for protection of trading ships in Caspian sea. And it's unclear in which order or in which shape the colors were but according to receipt books cloth of red, blue and white was used. It's unknown why these colors was used but it's a theory that they was using the red, blue and white cloths because it was the only available colors in the town (Dedinovo) where they was building the ship cuz it was colors of city's flag. I failed to finding the flag of town because nowadays it's this ship (Oryol) portrayed on the flag of Dedinovo. Also it is theory that even before this The Dutch Republic gifted a ship to Russia and since Russia never had ships before sailors just switched colors of the Dutch flag (but this is one of the most obscure theories). Later in 1694 it was documented that it was stripes with gold two-headed eagle (coat of arms of tsar of Moscow, basically the coat of arms of Romanov dynasty). In 1710 Peter The Great presented new flag for Russian navy (white field with blue saltire) and tricolor (white, blue, red stripes) became a flag of trading fleet. So Russian started to use white, blue and red before Peter The Great came to power but Peter definitely finished the establishment of these colors as main ones.
In WW1 the Germans had a Pacific fleet and they had some initial success engaging the British off the coast of Chile. Then they rounded the Cape and engaged some more British ships off Argentina and got completely annihilated. Every last ship sunk, no survivors.
"When I was in Moscow in the 90s, a Russian general explained to UK officials that Russia had never in its history fought a war of aggresion. Its territory had grown as a result of Moscow defending itself."
A fine irony. I have read something similar about Napoleon: he sought complete security for revolutionary France, but each victory and expansion made the French less secure, so they continued expanding aggressively in (pre-emptive) self-defence.
@@DeDyson you’re right. Therefore in British schools you will never receive information that more than 500 Nazi divisions were annihilate on the East front by the Red Army compared to more than 100 destroyed by Britain and US. Now make your own conclusion, whose role was more decisive in crashing of the Third Reich.
That's because in western schools chose not to teach kids. I remember when i was in school, we had to skip the part with the Russian Revolution and jump to the French Revolution, cause we were "running out of time" and had to cover all "key points".
@@DeDyson Yes, the Soviet Union single-handedly destroyed 80% of the German army - 6 times more than the USA, Great Britain and France. But the Cold War is over, and they still don't teach it in your schools.
Russian forces were in Denmark in 1716, Rhine in 1735 and 1748. Russian forces in Netherlands 1799 and Naples in 1806. The Persian war of 1722 led by Peter the Great and 1796 were also missing.
There’s a certain strength to these kinds of videos that make them important. Even when you gloss over in a cliff notes style, the shifting of borders and broad strokes still paint a picture of the human condition that’s as accurate and important as a detailed look at each and every event. It still says that this is madness and impressive all at once lol.
The video is fine but it paints the steppe nomads and tribes as innocent victims of russian imperialism Even before russia was a thing, the early slavs were constantly raided by the nomads. The pechenegs, khazars, alans, bolghars, cumans, turks and many others raided nonstop the russian countryside and towns, even taking slavs as slaves. And that's only before the mongols... The russian expansion into the eurasian steppes was not imperialism, it was to secure their borders and their own people.
@@Vasyapupkin-ks8fq The Alans were in ancient and early medieval times nomads, they were part of scythia as well. Yes, they are the modern chechens, ossetians, and others, due to proximity to georgia, armenia and byzantium they eventually feudalized, but they were pastoralist nomads in their origins.
@@endaohalloran6649 eh, no, it isn't. It's retaliation and self defence. One could argue that they took it too far and that at some point the mentality shifted, sure. But the main reason for russian expansion was to protect themselves from a very real and active threat.
It’s important to learn about these wars from a global perspective because that’s how they happen. Instead of being taught about one isolated battle at a time. Nothing happens in a vacuum. When we see why things happen the way they did, it all makes more sense. Well, as much sense as war can make, that is.
This is great. I am Russian and I love how detailed and simple to understand it is. I wish I had something like this during my history lessons when I was at school
Napoleon didn't attack Russia because he felt like he wasn't trustworthy, He attacked it because he ignored the blockade and begun trading with the british.
@@evgeniam685 Russia : Watch out, my peoples begin to starved in the winter i might be need some spices, potato's and more meat from Britain Napoleon : How about NO?
to this day i was looking for Russian history. no English channel had ever explained as you did. let alone be print media or any form of material. how did you get access to such a gold mine....thank you a zillion times
@@Legendaryium I mean, if you are forced to remember stuff you don't like and you will never use it, you will forget it. But if you learned something because you think it's interesting and or use it all the time, then you will 100% memorize it.
The Japanese didn't dominate in the Russo-Japanese war. The _Navy_ achieved its upset victory at Tsushima, but the Imperial Japanese Army paid dearly with heavy casualties for its victory
Just before this fact, you need to know one more thing. Before this war, Japan was considered among the countries of the third world, unable to repulse any European country. Japan has proven otherwise.
@@colombus4400 I am well aware of that. It was a huge deal at the time that an Asian power had defeated a European Empire in a straight-up fight. The point is simply that to describe it as "dominating" is inaccurate. It was a very hard-fought, costly victory for the Japanese land forces, and that's one of the main reasons why the Japanese Navy emerged from the war with a much better reputation than the army.
@@plumbirb8444 periodic uprisings throughout Russia throughout history will clearly disagree with you. The same USSR is the result of a revolution. And do not forget that in the Leningrad region, located 700 kilometers from the capital, 7 million people live, which is more than in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bulgaria and several other small European countries. The point is not the weakness of the regions, but their dependence on each other
@@plumbirb8444 а зачем восставать? Чтобы иметь лишние налоги, границы, языковой барьер, культурный барьер? Вам никогда не понять что мы стремимся к единому мирному существованию, пока вы воюете сотнями городов-государств.
That land is useless unless you need natural resources for the industry. The development of the industry was hindered by the fact that it is too cold to build and maintain factories. That is how Russia ended up having a weak industry despite having a lot of natural resources.
And even crazier that all of those lands are people who invaded Russia and we chased them bad home, Russia never invaded and stole and a land, we always turned the cards around
I can't imagine how Russian leaders back then up to now, manage the vast territories of Russia. Small countries even have a hard time managing theirs, but Russia is on a different level of micro and macro management.
they ruled by the same technology as the Tatars once ruled Ancient Russia: they concluded agreements with the princes of local tribes, supporting one against the other, They themselves collected tribute for Moscow. Plus small military garrisons for order, plus trading posts
Any Russian will testify that they don't manage it :P. More serious answer: at least until the USSR, it was the standard way, where every region has its own leader, who in turn report to the tsar. As long as the region likes its leader and that leader likes the tsar, all is well. It's how feudalism did it, and similar to how federalism solves it. Additionally it may be huge, but most is wasteland. Such regions can't really rebel effectively even if they wanted to, there's litlle there to invade for, and government tends to have limited influence in those far reaches anyway. Same way it's manageable for other huge wasteland countries like the US, China's inlands, Canadia and Denmark.
I would absolutely love to hear you explain USA’s & Canada’s colonization & all the resistances that happened during those times with the Indigenous People’s of both countries and the early European settlers
The European settler community would not have survived without the Iroquois who were long time allies of both the French and the English. The Iroquois had their own ambitions and fought other indigenous nations long before the arrival of the Europeans.
@@tanler7953 that's true of other Native American tribes too, not just the Iroqouis. The Iroquois League is another interesting story in itself, needs its own video here.
Very interesting. Note strikes that broke out in 1905 lead to the establishment of the Soviets (workers Councils). The czar was forced to set up the Dumas (Parliament) as a byproduct of this strike movement and the establishment of the soviets. The leader the worker Council was a guy named Leon Trotsky, he was sent to siberia after the defeat of the strike movement. He escape and fast forward he opposed the first world war and then organised the 1917 october revolution. 1905 and 1917 both very big historic events in Russian history.
I’ve learnt more from GeoHistory than a decade of apparently “professional” lessons in school EDIT: oml some of you have the driest sense of humour on the planet, and no I’m not American
Какой смысл и для кого было писать бред на английском из яндекс-переводчика, сделав аж полдюжины ошибок? Что Вы продемонстрировали, кроме своей малограмотности и глубокой периферийности?
@@jenechek4284 Товарищ патриот, мне Вам в слух подсчитать Ваши ошибки из очень средней пост.совковой школы для малограмотных, но при этом очень довольных собой?)) Тоже мне, закос под англоговорящего🤣🤣🤣 Если че, у Вас там даже не полдюжины, а целых 7 ошибок в коротенькой реплике - это, видимо, то самое непобедимое величие (малограмотности), входящее в комплект к патриотизму))
"WW1 started because some guy got assassinated" come on dude.., tyrannies and invasions always are done under some pretext. The real reasons are usually more complex, intricate, many times boil to either greed, some kind of self preservation or other ambitions.
Technically it started due to England putting economic sanctions on Germany. Germany used Arch Duke Ferdinand assassination as the excuse to go to war. Sanctions do have consequences. In the sacrifices of much blood on the battlefield.
@@blackwidowsm Basically it was a pointless war that was only started for money and power. Millions losing their life so the people in charge got rich, and the people that spoke out got put in prison too. And to think of weren't greedy WW2 would never have happened.
And Russia isnt? Depends on the point of history you think is the "right one". And of course every country chooses the time that was most favourable for them.
And England owned Australia and now it’s a sovereign country . Russia had to let go and accept history changes . If England invaded Australia because King Charles wants to restore historical. Borders, Australia would fight England
@@keithcojocari6425 i just think he want to win the election First he could use oil that did not work any more Invade krimea That does not work any more How do i win the next one? Just take all of Ukrain This guy want to rule Russia and would do any thing to get the support from the pepool I just watch this video "a different perspective of Ukraine" or is it some thing else
One edit. On Balkans first uprise was Serbian, and second also. Greek uprising is third. On both, first and second Serbian uprising, what we also use to call revolution, we have big support of Russia.
the first uprise was was made by the independent Albanian pashas from the Ali pasha of ionaninna and others there was no greece and serbia at that time...in reality the so-called Greek war of independence it was a religious civil war between Albanians...practically between Arvanites vs Albanians of egypt and Suliotes vs Ali pasha of ioannina ..
modern egypt was also created by the albanians.. and when the albanian Mehmet Ali of Egypt after the battle of nizip wanted to invade istanbul that empire was saved by the russians and other european powers except france
To the people in the comments pointing out smallest details and mistakes - this is a RUclips video not a university course. You can't expect them to put out a perfect video in such short amount of time. This is history and nobody knows 100% what happened centuries ago and which country did what. This is video is an overview of the dynamics of Russian history. But besides that, the quality, narration and graphics of this video are great and I can say that I gained more insight and interest in history from this channel than my school
For all those watching, the first romonov was not names Micheal, his name was Mikhail. The only reason I know this is because it's my father's name, and he is of Russian lineage
I am amazed and respect the Russians because the Russian spreading it's territories to the far east but without killing domestic people on it's way , while the western countries [England , Spain, Belgium ect ] were brutally killed a 100 of millions of Indians ,Aboriginal and African people .
Maybe it wasn’t necessary to kill, very empty territories, almost no resistance. Plus, it was indifferent for locals to whom they need to pay the taxes now - local khan or Russians
@@4637812648 I dont agree with both sides. Russian empire wasnt an angel empire or an evil empire. It was a usual empire,like British,French,German or other. There was some good thinks and some bad. P.s. Ok,agree about Circassian,but what about baltics? What are you talking about?
@@НиколайЮжаков-м7ф может по геополитике да,но по факту нет. Российская империя это империя,она покоряла народы так же как и британцы и погубила много людей. Это не плохо и не хорошо. Я люблю Российскую империю и не виню её ни в чём-это история
Just found this channel and am loving the smooth flowing map visuals. This video laid clear a common misconception people have about Russian history: sure, looking at the Russian Empire as a whole from its inception in the 18th century through its run into the early 20th, something like the October revolution was likely inevitable. But by focusing on the empire's latter history, you can see that after 1905 the country could've gone on a great number of other trajectories.
This video does an excellent job of summarizing the history of the Russian Empire and its impact on the world. It's a testament to the enduring legacy of the empire that it continues to shape modern-day Russia and its relationship with other nations. As we continue to navigate complex geopolitical relationships and global challenges, it's important to understand the historical context that shapes our world today. Let's learn from the past to build a better future for all.
@@М.Вахно я знаю. Просто удивляет, как некоторые украинцы старательно пытаются переписать историю, объявив Киев родиной русских земель, в обход Новгороду и Ладоге. При том, что даже в рассвет своего могущества Киев был лишь одним из княжеств, ничем особо не выделявшимся на фоне остальных.
@@Ekaterina_Samsonova Ахаах, розкажіть щось про Ладожское княжество)) "на Белоозере сидит весь, а на Ростове-озере - меря, на Клещине-озере также сидит меря, а по Оке-реке, де впадает в Волгу, сво1 язьік имеет мурома, і черемиси - свой язьік, і мордва свой язьік." А ето другие наробьі которьіе дают дань Руси: чудь, весь, меря, мурома, черемись, мордва, пермь, печера, ям, литва, зимигола, корсь, норома, либ, - ети свой язьік имеют, все они - из колена Афетового, живут в странах полуночньіх". Орда вас вьікормила и вьірастила, ордой вьі и стали
Hugely informative video which tends to educate ignorants like me! Its so incorrect and ignorant for most people to view European countries versus Russia through the brief lens period of WW1 & 2.
@@ЛЮСКУС тут скорее не "неверные", а иной взгляд со стороны запада. Например, в российской историографии южные регионы Центральной Азии упоминаются как "Узбекские ханства" и на месте будущего казахского Ханства "Узбекское Ханство"(название связано с ханом из узбекской династии Шайбанидов, хотя узбеков там не так уж и много). На западе используют для упрощения Transoxania, или Мавераннахр, а Ханство Абулхаира(Узбекское) употребляется так же, как и в России У нас, в Казахстане отмечают все государства региона. Ну, ещё от шайбанидов выделают Шибанидов как другую ветку, хотя на западе этого нет 🤔 В общем, какие источники, такая и подача.
@@FamouShinya скорее всего было всё проще.,если где то в той стороне жили узбеки.,то и землю некоторые кабинетные географы рисовали как получалось по направлению
Thank you for your magnificent videos about Russian history. I wish to watch your future videos which are about the episodes of USSR and then Russian Federation too.
Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg (Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!
Interesting this video stopped where it did, just before the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk …the most significant loss to the Russian Empire. Around 1/4 of its population was ceded or given independence.
Well it is On the other note, Bolsheviks already started supporting German working movement, a civil war started, and generally, this just resulted such a chaotic violence, that this treaty was just thrown away. By both sides, because "for the protection of independent Ukraine" German army marched far to East. Later, when a pressure on the Western front rose, they just left Ukraine, so as a result it was conquered by rsfr in no time. So basically, this treaty was just a useless shit not followed by anyone. Also it was funny, when former allies of Russia attacked it, because "it has a illegitimate government", or something like that. Well that's ended in failure, because it's not for anyone from another country to decide, what government is a legitimate one.
Think about it, how can a country that lives mostly only by selling raw materials be a military monster??? In military technologies, in some areas, even Turkey is already ahead of us (Russia), which massively created its strike drones back in 2014, and Russia has just now created single samples of strike drones.
I have heard a few mistakes concerning Poliand- Lituania's times. The nobilty there were not just Polish, most of them were local Rus. The Polish wanted to pull the Rus away from the Moscow ruled orthodox church which was and is 100% subordinate to the Moscow power.
Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg (Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!
@@APXuBAHgAJI ...and? The actions of individual Crimean Tatars in medieval times doesn't justify the ethnic cleansing and genocide under Stalin's regime centuries later. The only reason the peninsula is majority Russian today is because its native inhabitants were killed, imprisoned, or expelled. To this day, the Russian government has yet to compensate or repatriate any survivors or their descendants, and even goes so far as to ban Tatars from moving back to their homeland.
@@APXuBAHgAJI Russians had been trading Russian slaves for centuries too, treating them like animals, bartering them for dogs etc. Yet they did not "annihilate themselves to zero". Curious.
Fascinating to see the fluidity of borders over time condensed to 14 minutes, continuing seemingly in slo-mo even today. Humans are a rowdy bunch ! Thanks for the perspective.
@@CYbeRuKRaINiaN It is just unaccurately drawn but you know it's meant to represent the Austrian ownership of Southern Tyrol, while in Bulgaria's case a modern map was just copy-pasted and inserted into the video
@@Flankerski Yes but Bulgarian access to the Aegean sea really had a role in maritime trade and strategic interests, independent of tarrifs that could be placed by the Ottoman Empire and leaves the possibilities of Bulgaria being isolated navally by the Ottomans very unlikely.
Lol Russians, who are simultaneously fighting China in the Far East, winning European wars in the Baltic states and at the same time exploring North America, despite the fact that the population of the Russian Empire was smaller than that of France.
Serbian Gavrilo Princip was not a nationlist or assasin, but young man fighter for freedom and libaration from evil German occuapation of Serbian land!
Hannover. A Hannoverian was king of Britain in 1714, so I guess technically Hannover was part of Britain for a while. Or Britain was part of Hannover for a while.
17:35 Во наконец то появились Украинцы, долго же они отсиживались с момента как Киевская русь образованная ветвью рюриков перестала быть Киевской 😄. Хотя если учесть, что Киев основали поляне, которые являются родоначальниками современных Поляков, и тот факт что несколько сотен лет, это была территория Польши, Литвы, Золотой орды..... Московии.... Российской империи :-), все они там перемешались и вот эта гремучая смесь в какой момент стала Украинцами, которые считают что они там были всегда, в том числе и в Крыму. Удивительно. Это все равно что утверждать что американцы, которые бывшие Европейцы, не открывали континент, а всегда там жили и вообще основали там первые поселения людей.
А когда в Украине было много Литовцев или Турок из Золотой Орды, которые хоть и доминировали на территориях современной Южной Украины, но никогда не представляли собой демографически значимую группу населеня из-за никзой плотности населения.
The Previous Video about the Origin of the Russian people, and this one is Excelent. The history of those countries are so difficult to understand that we even know how to begining. Contrats for this Exelente Material.
3:35 actually, it was not Russia, who offered the protection. Khmelnytsky and his advisers gathered together and sent a proposal to Russia pleading to join it in exchange for fighting the Commonwealth.
You must be one hell of a lad, to disguise yourself as a peasant, while you're a Tzar and work for so long in a foreign shipyard. The guy was insane. Have you ever seen another royalty doing such a thing?
Russia has been an empire since 1576, when Ivan the 4th the Terrible was crowned as tsar. The word Tsar comes from the word Caesar and is synonymous with the word Emperor.
@@tatianamokienkoабсолютно является. И таковой она и была. Неважно что произошло в 1721г. Тем более , что никакого документа об официальном названии государства нет за этот период. А титул Императора российского признался различными странами не сразу и каждым государством отдельно и в разное время. А императором Государя Руси называли в договорах с Датским Королевство и Священной Римской Империей Германской Нации, ещё в конце 15 - начале 16 веков.
From this video one could think that Russia conquered Crimea just to get access to the Black sea, however the author didn't mention that the south of Russia had suffered from raids of the Crimean Tatars for decades before the annexation of the Crimea. Thousands of people had been captured and sold to the Ottoman Empire and countless villages and towns had been burnt in those raids. So, defeating the Crimean Khanate was not only the matter of expansion but also the matter of securing the southern borders
I'm Russian and I confirm that! Absolutely true! Thank you, stranger :)
Anyway, it doesn't have any influence on the current political events. That's just the history.
I had read it was over hundreds of years and millions of slavs had been sold as slaves through the Muslim world.. it was referred to as the culling of the steppes? I could be way off, I read about it probably 2 decades ago.
@@davidsaidov8308 The problem today, is that the US is uncapable to compete in an open world. Their greed to be the leaders of the world by force and sadly to have a precident that sufers from dementia.
@@migueluribe4249 Yes Biden is a complete JOKE .. The US Mainstream media covers for him He is a controlled puppet president very sad and disturbing situation here
@@Kyle-lx7xo That's where you get the word Slave from the Slavic people Slavs. They were also slaves for many other countries for hundreds of years not just Muslim ones but you are correct
The quality of these videos makes them more educational than 10 years in the school system.
School bad, youtube good
No not really
People who say this shit dont study or do homework and then complain that they dont learn anything 🤣
@@vve5174 Fun fact: Did you know that homework was actually first used as a punishment?
@Dr. Doofenshmirtz the guys isnt joking. dont try to make an excuse for it. people actually believe youtube videos teach them more then years in school
this video has so much detail in only 22 minutes it feels like an hour, it's breathtaking.... the russian perspective really helps me understand europe more
Omg this is fascinating,took World History in my high school days ,it would be better then if we had this kind of learning
you meant yay part of Eastern Europe w?Russia
it is not detail at all, this video more like introduction
The video is very superficial. The events are simply listed, and the author does not answer questions about the connection between these events and the needs of Russia. About Ivan the Terrible - nothing at all, except that he was paranoid. Is the author a psychiatrist to diagnose? And the nickname itself -
Ivan the Terrible is wrong. His nickname is closer to Thunderstorm, not horror. It is not said why he fought with the feudal lords. It is not said about the military, judicial and other reforms that strengthened Russia. Even the version that Ivan killed his son is only a version that has no evidence, but some present it as a fact. So those who want to know the history should not take such videos as a textbook.
@@evelynantonio4462 Interesting these historical stories on the internet are so valuable. I study WW2, the Third Reich, the Nazis, the technology developed during that war is poorly covered in school. I was fascinated by WW2 during two days in history class where we saw two films (as in real films shown on a projector) about WW2. Reading books by Joseph P. Farrell, for example, and all the videos on WW2 and Hitler really bring reality to recent 19th and 20th century history.
Russia, the only country to have rivalries with Germany, Iran, Sweden, the Ottomans, China, Poland, France, and Japan. Normally, those countries would have nothing to do with each other, but they all had issues with Russia at some point.
Every country has had issues with another country at some point, its ridiculous to say that Russia is rival to all of these countries just because they were at conflict at some point in their thousand year existence
I did not mention the wars with the Khazar Khaganate, Byzantium, the Golden Horde, Lithuania, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Livonian Order, the Kazan and Crimean Khanate and the main enemy Great Britain.
Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia Also
Basically everyone that are close to it
@@Mysterious_Person.87 не с вами проблем не было, Петр Швеции денежку заплатил, и вас купил, с вами ни каких проблем не было.
“With the Russian Empire teetering on the brink of collapse, the tsarist regime responded to the crises with its usual incompetence and obstinacy. The basic problem was that Nicholas himself remained totally oblivious to the extremity of the situation. While the country sank deeper into chaos he continued to fill his diary with terse and trivial notes on the weather, the company at tea and the number of birds he had shot that day. When Bulygin suggested that political concessions might be needed to calm the country, Nicholas was taken aback and told the Minister: 'One would think you are afraid a revolution will break out.' 'Your majesty,' came the reply, 'the revolution has already begun.”
― Orlando Figes,
Crazy
@ThyPeasantSlayer We don't do that here .__.
@ThyPeasantSlayer Youre legit celebrating Russia..
on a comment quoting a criticism about Nicholas II.
@@vimic9507 demonstration of the IQ index of Russian nationalist monarchists
@ThyPeasantSlayer SLAVE ROSSIA
日本人です。
英語リスニングテスト対策に使っています。
歴史教材としても英語教材としてもこの動画は非常に優れています
日本ファシスト？😂
LANGUAGE
I’m here for listening English as well! Konnichiwa!
i mean, since there is a whole list of these videos but in many languages, this comment inspired me
@@max_csdloradon6889katakana lol
4:36 Peter the Great admiring and wanting to emulate the Dutch Republic provides one possible explanation why the Russian tricolor flag is (apparently) based on the Dutch
When France became a republic they also adapted the Dutch flag by turning it on its side... although the French never admitted they did that and pretended they came up with their tricolour on their own.
It's not really like this. Despite really unclear early history of Russian flag red, blue and white was a main colors of Russian flag at least since 1667-1668 when father of Peter The Great still was the ruler of Russia. The first documented moment of this three colors being in use refers to the first Russian navy ship called Oryol (Eagle) which was built in 1667 for protection of trading ships in Caspian sea. And it's unclear in which order or in which shape the colors were but according to receipt books cloth of red, blue and white was used. It's unknown why these colors was used but it's a theory that they was using the red, blue and white cloths because it was the only available colors in the town (Dedinovo) where they was building the ship cuz it was colors of city's flag. I failed to finding the flag of town because nowadays it's this ship (Oryol) portrayed on the flag of Dedinovo. Also it is theory that even before this The Dutch Republic gifted a ship to Russia and since Russia never had ships before sailors just switched colors of the Dutch flag (but this is one of the most obscure theories). Later in 1694 it was documented that it was stripes with gold two-headed eagle (coat of arms of tsar of Moscow, basically the coat of arms of Romanov dynasty). In 1710 Peter The Great presented new flag for Russian navy (white field with blue saltire) and tricolor (white, blue, red stripes) became a flag of trading fleet.
So Russian started to use white, blue and red before Peter The Great came to power but Peter definitely finished the establishment of these colors as main ones.
Peter Griffin.
Эти цвета основополагающие для славян
@@Aridaybey Чехия, Словакия, Словения, Сербия, Польша, Югославия, Хорватия
Land: exist
Russia: and I took that personally
That applies to every country lol
@@Admin-gm3lc . He must be talking about the WASTE LAND.
@@Admin-gm3lc How does that apply to Chad?
Literally
More like Britain 😂
“The Baltic Fleet, after several months of navigation, is defeated by the Japanese Fleet.”
Oh boy, that’s a whole story in itself.
Yeah all for nothing. Hope they had a nice trip seeing half the world tho.
In WW1 the Germans had a Pacific fleet and they had some initial success engaging the British off the coast of Chile. Then they rounded the Cape and engaged some more British ships off Argentina and got completely annihilated. Every last ship sunk, no survivors.
the whole story is the baltic fleet was sabotaged by english spions
@@МишаМедведь-р6о при чем тут Крым, речь о русско-японской
@@flatl1ne я не в ту ветку отправил свой комментарий.
"When I was in Moscow in the 90s, a Russian general explained to UK officials that Russia had never in its history fought a war of aggresion. Its territory had grown as a result of Moscow defending itself."
Cool story bro
It is like explaining how NATO is a defensive Alliance, while constantly invading other countries and growing in size
A fine irony. I have read something similar about Napoleon: he sought complete security for revolutionary France, but each victory and expansion made the French less secure, so they continued expanding aggressively in (pre-emptive) self-defence.
Yeah when u think about it's kinda true
@@fhffvgju6299 ye
It’s weird how little of Russian history I know compared to French or German history. Great video as always.
@@DeDyson The truth can't be hidden forever. Everything happend will be known sooner or later.
@@DeDyson you’re right. Therefore in British schools you will never receive information that more than 500 Nazi divisions were annihilate on the East front by the Red Army compared to more than 100 destroyed by Britain and US. Now make your own conclusion, whose role was more decisive in crashing of the Third Reich.
That's because in western schools chose not to teach kids. I remember when i was in school, we had to skip the part with the Russian Revolution and jump to the French Revolution, cause we were "running out of time" and had to cover all "key points".
@@DeDyson Yes, the Soviet Union single-handedly destroyed 80% of the German army - 6 times more than the USA, Great Britain and France. But the Cold War is over, and they still don't teach it in your schools.
For me it's the other way around. In America, or at least in Massachusetts, we learn so much about Russian history.
Fun fact, by the end of Romanov’s reign, most of Romanovs were ethnically more of German origin than Russian.
Same as the British Royals.
@@DS9TREK same as Indonesia royals
*in alt world*
Same as the Romanian royals. Even now we have a german president..........
@@afdalridwan3813 Same as the gogglebobblewit royals
*E*
Same as the whole world boy
Таких каналов настолько мало, что приходиться слушать историю России на английском
Они скоро переведут это видео на русский. Каналов таких не так уж и мало, нужно просто поискать - например "История Российской Империи".
Мы живем в обществе.
Мне нравится английский язык,, Я очень хорошо знаю английский. Мы должны сделать нашу страну более дружественной к английскому языку.
Что бы знать чью либо историю , внезапно, -нужно читать историческую литературу
Ура я здесь не один Русский
Russian forces were in Denmark in 1716, Rhine in 1735 and 1748. Russian forces in Netherlands 1799 and Naples in 1806. The Persian war of 1722 led by Peter the Great and 1796 were also missing.
Thanks!
There’s a certain strength to these kinds of videos that make them important. Even when you gloss over in a cliff notes style, the shifting of borders and broad strokes still paint a picture of the human condition that’s as accurate and important as a detailed look at each and every event. It still says that this is madness and impressive all at once lol.
Eareaeareaeareaeareaeareaeareacool.era
The video is fine but it paints the steppe nomads and tribes as innocent victims of russian imperialism
Even before russia was a thing, the early slavs were constantly raided by the nomads. The pechenegs, khazars, alans, bolghars, cumans, turks and many others raided nonstop the russian countryside and towns, even taking slavs as slaves. And that's only before the mongols... The russian expansion into the eurasian steppes was not imperialism, it was to secure their borders and their own people.
I'm Caucasian, and I'm ashamed to read it. The Alans are not nomads. These are modern Chechens, Ossetians, Ingush and Balkars.
@@Vasyapupkin-ks8fq The Alans were in ancient and early medieval times nomads, they were part of scythia as well. Yes, they are the modern chechens, ossetians, and others, due to proximity to georgia, armenia and byzantium they eventually feudalized, but they were pastoralist nomads in their origins.
That's still imperialism?
@@endaohalloran6649 eh, no, it isn't. It's retaliation and self defence. One could argue that they took it too far and that at some point the mentality shifted, sure. But the main reason for russian expansion was to protect themselves from a very real and active threat.
You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
It’s important to learn about these wars from a global perspective because that’s how they happen. Instead of being taught about one isolated battle at a time. Nothing happens in a vacuum. When we see why things happen the way they did, it all makes more sense. Well, as much sense as war can make, that is.
This is great. I am Russian and I love how detailed and simple to understand it is. I wish I had something like this during my history lessons when I was at school
you must be aware that your country is now at the height of it's receiving hate as your president and your army is committing war crimes in ukraine
Если б ты не спал на уроках, то знал бы всё это.
@@settaquilon если система образования было нормальное то все бы знал он)
@@КирюшаАккуратный-с5п плохому танцору вечно что-то мешает.
@@settaquilon 🤨📸 🏻🤔 🤣 🏻👉🤡
It would be really helpful in the future if you added the populations of the countries at the time
+
Cannot , all history war wich west and south
Populations of countries before the modern age are all speculations though.
@@Fankas2000 Even an approximate figure would be helpful.
Agreed.
Greatest country in the world. They had more wars than someone else in this world! Great morale and great people !
@qwerty qwerty? ты не русский.
Does anyone else miss the original narrator? His accent was captivating and he spoke English so well. The videos just aren't as gripping as before.
Yes
Yes, but he (Rahul Venkit) wrote that he decided to move on to other projects
@SmashRockCroc that's your opinion and it doesn't count.
@SmashRockCroc Yes kid, our prophet was illiterate.
@SmashRockCroc Lol I don't mention kids, i am mentioning you.
Napoleon didn't attack Russia because he felt like he wasn't trustworthy, He attacked it because he ignored the blockade and begun trading with the british.
all official history, soon people will learn actual history and will be surprised.
@@evgeniam685 Russia : Watch out, my peoples begin to starved in the winter i might be need some spices, potato's and more meat from Britain
Napoleon : How about NO?
It was a mistake. Russia had to make a deal with Napoleon to destroy Britain
to this day i was looking for Russian history. no English channel had ever explained as you did. let alone be print media or any form of material. how did you get access to such a gold mine....thank you a zillion times
11:58 Napoleon: “What could possibly go wrong?”
"Invade Russia they said, I'll be easy they said"
NAPOLEON after invading Russia ......."I think I go back in time :/"
Napoleon was winned by Kazakh warriors. 100 K kazakhs won him.
@@nur-alijanqojayev329 where did you got this information?
@@artemvektor1 by french historics. Of course russian historics won’t say the truth
These videos taught me more than I ever had in school.
so if i test you on the information of this video next week, you will remember everything? if you think so you are delusional.
@@LegendaryiumI would be able to recall things better than what the school system would have taught me.
True that
@@Legendaryium you are a teacher aren't you?
@@Legendaryium I mean, if you are forced to remember stuff you don't like and you will never use it, you will forget it. But if you learned something because you think it's interesting and or use it all the time, then you will 100% memorize it.
The fact that we get free documentaries on RUclips by Geo History is truly a gift 👍
Thank you so much for this material! Helped me tremendously to refresh and deepen my knowledge of the country's history.
The Japanese didn't dominate in the Russo-Japanese war. The _Navy_ achieved its upset victory at Tsushima, but the Imperial Japanese Army paid dearly with heavy casualties for its victory
Yes but they still pushed the Russians back in Manchuria and Sakhalin
Just before this fact, you need to know one more thing. Before this war, Japan was considered among the countries of the third world, unable to repulse any European country. Japan has proven otherwise.
@@colombus4400 I am well aware of that. It was a huge deal at the time that an Asian power had defeated a European Empire in a straight-up fight. The point is simply that to describe it as "dominating" is inaccurate. It was a very hard-fought, costly victory for the Japanese land forces, and that's one of the main reasons why the Japanese Navy emerged from the war with a much better reputation than the army.
The same argument could be made for the Soviets in WW2 who by far had the most casualties.
Pretty sure they won almost all the battles
it is crazy how much land Russia has it and kept almost all of it throughout the centuries.
And Yeltsin in one month gave away almost everything that the Russians had collected for centuries
@@plumbirb8444 periodic uprisings throughout Russia throughout history will clearly disagree with you. The same USSR is the result of a revolution. And do not forget that in the Leningrad region, located 700 kilometers from the capital, 7 million people live, which is more than in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bulgaria and several other small European countries. The point is not the weakness of the regions, but their dependence on each other
@@plumbirb8444 а зачем восставать? Чтобы иметь лишние налоги, границы, языковой барьер, культурный барьер? Вам никогда не понять что мы стремимся к единому мирному существованию, пока вы воюете сотнями городов-государств.
That land is useless unless you need natural resources for the industry. The development of the industry was hindered by the fact that it is too cold to build and maintain factories. That is how Russia ended up having a weak industry despite having a lot of natural resources.
And even crazier that all of those lands are people who invaded Russia and we chased them bad home, Russia never invaded and stole and a land, we always turned the cards around
I can't imagine how Russian leaders back then up to now, manage the vast territories of Russia. Small countries even have a hard time managing theirs, but Russia is on a different level of micro and macro management.
U clearly have no idea of russia :d its all have been shithole except Petersburg and Msocow.
melting pots killed the US.
they ruled by the same technology as the Tatars once ruled Ancient Russia: they concluded agreements with the princes of local tribes, supporting one against the other, They themselves collected tribute for Moscow. Plus small military garrisons for order, plus trading posts
@@nika6184 you're kidding, Kazan and Ekaterinburg alone are much cooler than Moscow and St Petersburg
Any Russian will testify that they don't manage it :P.
More serious answer: at least until the USSR, it was the standard way, where every region has its own leader, who in turn report to the tsar. As long as the region likes its leader and that leader likes the tsar, all is well. It's how feudalism did it, and similar to how federalism solves it.
Additionally it may be huge, but most is wasteland. Such regions can't really rebel effectively even if they wanted to, there's litlle there to invade for, and government tends to have limited influence in those far reaches anyway. Same way it's manageable for other huge wasteland countries like the US, China's inlands, Canadia and Denmark.
I would absolutely love to hear you explain USA’s & Canada’s colonization & all the resistances that happened during those times with the Indigenous People’s of both countries and the early European settlers
The European settler community would not have survived without the Iroquois who were long time allies of both the French and the English. The Iroquois had their own ambitions and fought other indigenous nations long before the arrival of the Europeans.
@@tanler7953 that's true of other Native American tribes too, not just the Iroqouis. The Iroquois League is another interesting story in itself, needs its own video here.
He already did a video on it.
Very interesting. Note strikes that broke out in 1905 lead to the establishment of the Soviets (workers Councils). The czar was forced to set up the Dumas (Parliament) as a byproduct of this strike movement and the establishment of the soviets. The leader the worker Council was a guy named Leon Trotsky, he was sent to siberia after the defeat of the strike movement. He escape and fast forward he opposed the first world war and then organised the 1917 october revolution.
1905 and 1917 both very big historic events in Russian history.
There are big but one if the worst events in russian history
20:45 It is shown there that in 1914 western Thrace was part of the Ottoman Empire. This is false. In 1914 western Thrace was part of Bulgaria.
I’ve learnt more from GeoHistory than a decade of apparently “professional” lessons in school
EDIT: oml some of you have the driest sense of humour on the planet, and no I’m not American
Wow how bad can your American schools get?
Same here
@@ZeroEagle667 I’m not American.
@@Barsik-M I’m really not American. I’m from Europe….
@@Barsik-M I literally despise america so much 💀
In less then an hr, I was able to recapture my 8 yrs of History in school! Very brief, but accurate.
Despite the long waits, these videos are so high quality!
As a student of imperial Russia, I find this fascinating.
Looking back at the history of Russia. No one will be able to break her and she will remind everyone of her greatness
What greatness?
True
Какой смысл и для кого было писать бред на английском из яндекс-переводчика, сделав аж полдюжины ошибок? Что Вы продемонстрировали, кроме своей малограмотности и глубокой периферийности?
@@MrAtomicPig idk what you talking about, go wash your face
@@jenechek4284 Товарищ патриот, мне Вам в слух подсчитать Ваши ошибки из очень средней пост.совковой школы для малограмотных, но при этом очень довольных собой?)) Тоже мне, закос под англоговорящего🤣🤣🤣 Если че, у Вас там даже не полдюжины, а целых 7 ошибок в коротенькой реплике - это, видимо, то самое непобедимое величие (малограмотности), входящее в комплект к патриотизму))
"WW1 started because some guy got assassinated" come on dude.., tyrannies and invasions always are done under some pretext. The real reasons are usually more complex, intricate, many times boil to either greed, some kind of self preservation or other ambitions.
Technically it started due to England putting economic sanctions on Germany. Germany used Arch Duke Ferdinand assassination as the excuse to go to war. Sanctions do have consequences. In the sacrifices of much blood on the battlefield.
@@blackwidowsm Ye I've seen that side of things too. Apparently Germany was going to overtake UK, so they did everything to stop them.
@@blackwidowsm Basically it was a pointless war that was only started for money and power.
Millions losing their life so the people in charge got rich, and the people that spoke out got put in prison too.
And to think of weren't greedy WW2 would never have happened.
@@GCAbleism158 only if WW1 didnt happen. WW2 was more of a continuation after a truce
Show this video to Ukrainians, they are completely crazy about how their country is rewriting history
There is literally circus in comments under the previous part :)
In Russia we say in such cases "every pipette dreams to become an enema"
Empires always occupied people from many etnicities and religions people. What is your point?
And Russia isnt? Depends on the point of history you think is the "right one". And of course every country chooses the time that was most favourable for them.
And England owned Australia and now it’s a sovereign country . Russia had to let go and accept history changes . If England invaded Australia because King Charles wants to restore historical. Borders, Australia would fight England
I am also Russian, and I love the history of one of the greatest countries in the world. Great video.
What do you think about Ukraine
And yea Russia is a great country making the nazi Germany fall
@@thefirstkingdogo1126 I don't believe all the killing is proper. But I understand why Putin wants the land. Turning back the clock 300 years.
@@keithcojocari6425 i just think he want to win the election
First he could use oil that did not work any more
Invade krimea
That does not work any more
How do i win the next one?
Just take all of Ukrain
This guy want to rule Russia and would do any thing to get the support from the pepool
I just watch this video "a different perspective of Ukraine" or is it some thing else
@@thefirstkingdogo1126 Ukraine is a Nazi country ruled by the USA that's what I think about it
Glad to see the borders getting more improved. Nice work man.
980K
One edit. On Balkans first uprise was Serbian, and second also. Greek uprising is third.
On both, first and second Serbian uprising, what we also use to call revolution, we have big support of Russia.
the first uprise was was made by the independent Albanian pashas from the Ali pasha of ionaninna and others there was no greece and serbia at that time...in reality the so-called Greek war of independence it was a religious civil war between Albanians...practically between Arvanites vs Albanians of egypt and Suliotes vs Ali pasha of ioannina ..
modern egypt was also created by the albanians.. and when the albanian Mehmet Ali of Egypt after the battle of nizip wanted to invade istanbul that empire was saved by the russians and other european powers except france
There was also a Romanian uprising in 1821, in the same time with the Greek one.
@@Flankerski Yes, i know that. Wr had it in 1804-1815, then second uprise, or freedom revolution in 1815-1817.
Здравствуй, сестра! Русские и сербы братья навек!
A very good documentary video, very informative and educational, explaining alot about the current problems facing the Russo-Ukrainian war. Thank you.
First Real Slavic Empire in the Word!!!
To the people in the comments pointing out smallest details and mistakes - this is a RUclips video not a university course. You can't expect them to put out a perfect video in such short amount of time. This is history and nobody knows 100% what happened centuries ago and which country did what. This is video is an overview of the dynamics of Russian history.
But besides that, the quality, narration and graphics of this video are great and I can say that I gained more insight and interest in history from this channel than my school
Yeah it's always funny that people nitpick so much from video. Like jeez
For all those watching, the first romonov was not names Micheal, his name was Mikhail. The only reason I know this is because it's my father's name, and he is of Russian lineage
Tomayto tomatto
@@aarongranda7825 ok Ay-Aron
Maybe that's the english version of that name? But I am not sure....
It's the same name bruh
I am amazed and respect the Russians because the Russian spreading it's territories to the far east but without killing domestic people on it's way , while the western countries [England , Spain, Belgium ect ] were brutally killed a 100 of millions of Indians ,Aboriginal and African people .
With,dude,with.
Maybe it wasn’t necessary to kill, very empty territories, almost no resistance. Plus, it was indifferent for locals to whom they need to pay the taxes now - local khan or Russians
@@4637812648 I dont agree with both sides. Russian empire wasnt an angel empire or an evil empire. It was a usual empire,like British,French,German or other. There was some good thinks and some bad.
P.s. Ok,agree about Circassian,but what about baltics? What are you talking about?
@@dowmont6209 Совершенно другого типа империя, нежели британская или европейская.
Не колониальная. Континентальная. Хартленд по Мак Киндеру.
@@НиколайЮжаков-м7ф может по геополитике да,но по факту нет. Российская империя это империя,она покоряла народы так же как и британцы и погубила много людей. Это не плохо и не хорошо. Я люблю Российскую империю и не виню её ни в чём-это история
Love that the quality of the videos keep becoming better and better
is it really?
Just found this channel and am loving the smooth flowing map visuals. This video laid clear a common misconception people have about Russian history: sure, looking at the Russian Empire as a whole from its inception in the 18th century through its run into the early 20th, something like the October revolution was likely inevitable.
But by focusing on the empire's latter history, you can see that after 1905 the country could've gone on a great number of other trajectories.
In 21:06 the map shows the Ottoman Empire owning east Thrace when Bulgaria owned it at the time.
Forget second balkan war?
@@gonoriq Greece owned it at the time. My mistake. But its still wrong
Looking forward for USSR and Russian Federation summary!
Your video was on the TV news today in Lebanon 🇱🇧 😁
Congratulations! You’re famous!
Do they realy get on tv there 😁
@@thefirstkingdogo1126 Yes they did 😁
Which video?
@@hehehehaw3521 this one actually. The one about the Russian Empire
This video does an excellent job of summarizing the history of the Russian Empire and its impact on the world. It's a testament to the enduring legacy of the empire that it continues to shape modern-day Russia and its relationship with other nations. As we continue to navigate complex geopolitical relationships and global challenges, it's important to understand the historical context that shapes our world today. Let's learn from the past to build a better future for all.
История России надо вести не от града Москвы, а от Старой Ладоги, Новгорода
Сегодня ее модно вести от Киева...)
@@Ekaterina_Samsonova брехня, Киев был хазарским кишлаком, в него Новгородцы Русь принесли
@@М.Вахно я знаю. Просто удивляет, как некоторые украинцы старательно пытаются переписать историю, объявив Киев родиной русских земель, в обход Новгороду и Ладоге. При том, что даже в рассвет своего могущества Киев был лишь одним из княжеств, ничем особо не выделявшимся на фоне остальных.
@@Ekaterina_Samsonova они упоротых безграмотные с ложной исключительностбю особи
@@Ekaterina_Samsonova Ахаах, розкажіть щось про Ладожское княжество))
"на Белоозере сидит весь, а на Ростове-озере - меря, на Клещине-озере также сидит меря, а по Оке-реке, де впадает в Волгу, сво1 язьік имеет мурома, і черемиси - свой язьік, і мордва свой язьік." А ето другие наробьі которьіе дают дань Руси: чудь, весь, меря, мурома, черемись, мордва, пермь, печера, ям, литва, зимигола, корсь, норома, либ, - ети свой язьік имеют, все они - из колена Афетового, живут в странах полуночньіх". Орда вас вьікормила и вьірастила, ордой вьі и стали
Hugely informative video which tends to educate ignorants like me! Its so incorrect and ignorant for most people to view European countries versus Russia through the brief lens period of WW1 & 2.
Lots of new learned about Russian Empire, thanks for your effort Sir! because I love World History especially about Wars.
но в основных вопросах в ролике придуманные и неверные причинно следственные трактовки событий
@@ЛЮСКУС тут скорее не "неверные", а иной взгляд со стороны запада.
Например, в российской историографии южные регионы Центральной Азии упоминаются как "Узбекские ханства" и на месте будущего казахского Ханства "Узбекское Ханство"(название связано с ханом из узбекской династии Шайбанидов, хотя узбеков там не так уж и много).
На западе используют для упрощения Transoxania, или Мавераннахр, а Ханство Абулхаира(Узбекское) употребляется так же, как и в России
У нас, в Казахстане отмечают все государства региона. Ну, ещё от шайбанидов выделают Шибанидов как другую ветку, хотя на западе этого нет 🤔
В общем, какие источники, такая и подача.
@@FamouShinya скорее всего было всё проще.,если где то в той стороне жили узбеки.,то и землю некоторые кабинетные географы рисовали как получалось по направлению
@@ЛЮСКУС где-то видел карту 1440 года, где все государства Шайбанидов объединили. От южной Сибири до Узбекистана одна большая территория :0
@@FamouShinya странно,,в старых картах эти области носят одно название-моголо-тартария
Thank you for your magnificent videos about Russian history. I wish to watch your future videos which are about the episodes of USSR and then Russian Federation too.
Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg
(Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!
this is full of inaccuracies or simplifications - but holy hell it would be 10 hrs long if you want the full story
I can't wait to find out what happens in the next episode!
Interesting this video stopped where it did, just before the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk …the most significant loss to the Russian Empire. Around 1/4 of its population was ceded or given independence.
Wasn't this after the Bolshevik Revolution? I suspect he's working on another video that has to due with the rise of the USSR.
Read the title of the video
@@Trome1200 Yeah, it was the peace treaty signed between the German Empire & the Bolsheviks.
Well it is
On the other note, Bolsheviks already started supporting German working movement, a civil war started, and generally, this just resulted such a chaotic violence, that this treaty was just thrown away. By both sides, because "for the protection of independent Ukraine" German army marched far to East.
Later, when a pressure on the Western front rose, they just left Ukraine, so as a result it was conquered by rsfr in no time.
So basically, this treaty was just a useless shit not followed by anyone.
Also it was funny, when former allies of Russia attacked it, because "it has a illegitimate government", or something like that.
Well that's ended in failure, because it's not for anyone from another country to decide, what government is a legitimate one.
The video’s name is history of Russian Empire. Brest-Litovsk was during Soviet Russia.
Russia is a beast. Not even US can rival it's growing power nowadays.
Могут, и активно враждуют с нами, вплотную к границам России приблизились...
Эта борьба уже не за наши интересы, а за наше собственное выживание
Yea, their economy has been compared to the size of New York State. The mouse that roared!
Think about it, how can a country that lives mostly only by selling raw materials be a military monster??? In military technologies, in some areas, even Turkey is already ahead of us (Russia), which massively created its strike drones back in 2014, and Russia has just now created single samples of strike drones.
It's not true. Our economy is weak and plagued by corruption. A lot of youngsters dream to move to US, Canada or Europe
I have heard a few mistakes concerning Poliand- Lituania's times. The nobilty there were not just Polish, most of them were local Rus. The Polish wanted to pull the Rus away from the Moscow ruled orthodox church which was and is 100% subordinate to the Moscow power.
Why almost nothing was told about the role of Ukraine? Firsly, after Kyivan Rus` fall, Sweden had admited the Indenpendance of Ukraine in 1711. The map of Ukraine (1720) BEFORE Russian Empire was proclamed (1721) is here: URL : uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukrania_quae_et_Terra_Cosaccorum_cum_vicinis_Walachiae,_Moldoviae,_Johann_Baptiste_Homann_(Nuremberg,_1720).jpg
(Seach: Ukrania quae et Terra Cosaccorum in Google) !!! Feel the difference!
Russia has such an interesting and rich history, thanks for the video.
Can you do the History of the Soviet Union next?
That's what part three is going to be
What a perfect way to start your weekend
It is mind-blowing how the Russians managed to end both the Napoleonic Wars and World War 2.
“A Russian army invades Crimea”
Hey I’ve seen this one
Edit: What a shit show in the replies
After hundreds of years of trading in Russian slaves, the Crimean Tatars were lucky that they were not annihilated to zero.
@@APXuBAHgAJI ...and? The actions of individual Crimean Tatars in medieval times doesn't justify the ethnic cleansing and genocide under Stalin's regime centuries later. The only reason the peninsula is majority Russian today is because its native inhabitants were killed, imprisoned, or expelled. To this day, the Russian government has yet to compensate or repatriate any survivors or their descendants, and even goes so far as to ban Tatars from moving back to their homeland.
@@APXuBAHgAJI what a nice genocidal maniac. Adolf, Mao and Jossif would have been your best friends. what a nice company.
@@p00bix Based russians
@@APXuBAHgAJI Russians had been trading Russian slaves for centuries too, treating them like animals, bartering them for dogs etc.
Yet they did not "annihilate themselves to zero". Curious.
19:57
I love how this was mentioned only now (some 10 years before a revolution)
Fascinating to see the fluidity of borders over time condensed to 14 minutes, continuing seemingly in slo-mo even today. Humans are a rowdy bunch ! Thanks for the perspective.
20:19 When the whole map is correct except for Bulgaria. It lost all of Dobrudja to Romania in the Second Balkan War but had access to the Aegean Sea
What about too big Montenegro?
What about southern Tyrol?
@@CYbeRuKRaINiaN It is just unaccurately drawn but you know it's meant to represent the Austrian ownership of Southern Tyrol, while in Bulgaria's case a modern map was just copy-pasted and inserted into the video
Yeah, but somehow that's not even relevant. Romania returned southern Dobrogea to Bulgaria after WWII anyway.
@@Flankerski Yes but Bulgarian access to the Aegean sea really had a role in maritime trade and strategic interests, independent of tarrifs that could be placed by the Ottoman Empire and leaves the possibilities of Bulgaria being isolated navally by the Ottomans very unlikely.
Finally, another awesome video 👌
As an American, I really liked your video! 🙏🥰
I'm kidding, from Russia, the city of Astrakhan, which is located 80 km
These videos always make me want to go travelling
If you want to see the real Russia, you should not go to big cities like Moscow or St. Petersburg)
Invaluable information, worth reading volumes of history books.
Great job jamming so much history into a short story.
Lol Russians, who are simultaneously fighting China in the Far East, winning European wars in the Baltic states and at the same time exploring North America, despite the fact that the population of the Russian Empire was smaller than that of France.
Serbian Gavrilo Princip was not a nationlist or assasin, but young man fighter for freedom and libaration from evil German occuapation of Serbian land!
nor was he serbian !
What is that orange bit below denmark, part of Great Britain?? 10:40
Hannover. A Hannoverian was king of Britain in 1714, so I guess technically Hannover was part of Britain for a while. Or Britain was part of Hannover for a while.
Nice one, thank you! 🤩
17:35 Во наконец то появились Украинцы, долго же они отсиживались с момента как Киевская русь образованная ветвью рюриков перестала быть Киевской 😄. Хотя если учесть, что Киев основали поляне, которые являются родоначальниками современных Поляков, и тот факт что несколько сотен лет, это была территория Польши, Литвы, Золотой орды..... Московии.... Российской империи :-), все они там перемешались и вот эта гремучая смесь в какой момент стала Украинцами, которые считают что они там были всегда, в том числе и в Крыму. Удивительно. Это все равно что утверждать что американцы, которые бывшие Европейцы, не открывали континент, а всегда там жили и вообще основали там первые поселения людей.
Что за ... это теория
Вообще то украинцы я считаю потомками казаков
@@chidenzzz Нет. Они потомки гречкосеев.
А когда в Украине было много Литовцев или Турок из Золотой Орды, которые хоть и доминировали на территориях современной Южной Украины, но никогда не представляли собой демографически значимую группу населеня из-за никзой плотности населения.
Can you imagine if Russia didn't sell Alaska to US.... Russia territories will cover 3 continents... Europe, Asia and Ametica
If they didnt sell it, US would probably attack them since they havent any army in alaska back then
Alaska will probably get taken by the British
Hard to controll + useless + didn't care. Also sold california to states
What was going on with the flags? Using modern equivalents is one thing, but being inconsistent and only doing it for some is an interesting desision.
Please do a video on the European History, perhaps starting with the formation of the Roman Empire and ending with modern day.
The Previous Video about the Origin of the Russian people, and this one is Excelent. The history of those countries are so difficult to understand that we even know how to begining. Contrats for this Exelente Material.
Wow I think one never really appreciates how often Europe was at war !
они не воевали..так мелкие недоразумения
It appears that Europe has had more wars than the rest of the world combined.
3:35 actually, it was not Russia, who offered the protection. Khmelnytsky and his advisers gathered together and sent a proposal to Russia pleading to join it in exchange for fighting the Commonwealth.
You saved me weeks of study ..... and, because of the graphic contents, he result is even better
many many thanks
Good video. The Crimean War was fight against Russia and England, France and Italy.
15:30
Thank you! I learned more than at school
You must be one hell of a lad, to disguise yourself as a peasant, while you're a Tzar and work for so long in a foreign shipyard. The guy was insane. Have you ever seen another royalty doing such a thing?
he was a nuclear powered man really. Some people are so energetic they literally bend everything around themselves to their will
@@okakokakiev787 that is called a human being....up to you what and how you want to live your life....you do things......guys wake up.....
Plz do History of india next. Much appreciate your efforts.
he did.
although a history of India before the 1900s would be appreciated.
India socks.
@@Code-002 that's why I asked him to do again
@@TheSuperBoyProject that might be your opinion but not mine
@@TheSuperBoyProject well saying that india sucks is the equivalent of us saying your country f*cks
Very well explained. Much appreciated.
Did anyone notice In 20:20 the Serbia borders are wrong sorry for wrong time
Russia the largest country on the planet, and naturally the most powerful country on earth 🌎. Greetings from LAS Vegas
That would make Canada the second most powerful ?
This logic is scuffed :/
Thanks sir please make your lectures on week basis sir it will be your kindness.
I have seen 3 videos on your channel so far, but i subscribed the moment i heard the 'Ridddle guy'! His voice makes you watch the videos on and on!
Russia has been an empire since 1576, when Ivan the 4th the Terrible was crowned as tsar. The word Tsar comes from the word Caesar and is synonymous with the word Emperor.
Russia officially became an empire in 1721, under Peter 1
Не является синонимом слова император
@@tatianamokienkoабсолютно является. И таковой она и была.
Неважно что произошло в 1721г.
Тем более , что никакого документа об официальном названии государства нет за этот период.
А титул Императора российского признался различными странами не сразу и каждым государством отдельно и в разное время.
А императором Государя Руси называли в договорах с Датским Королевство и Священной Римской Империей Германской Нации, ещё в конце 15 - начале 16 веков.
why no one in videos talks about how Russia helped Usa to get its freedom
Because my mainstream media narrative Russia meant to be evil 😅