I was born in Finland. My grandfather, born in 1895 (Finland was back then a Grandutchy of Russia), lived and served in the army quite near the Russian border, and for reasons I have never known, got some of the furniture of the Romanovs, including a piano, which my family then gave to a local museum. I remember for instance the chairs, all of them carrying the Romanov seal underneath. They have always fascinated me very much, and God knows where these items have ended up after my grandparents died. Major world history mixed up with little personal stories.
I'm just surprised there *are* international waters in the med. I assumed it was small enough for the bordering countries to have adjoining national waters...
@@iamdigory Yes. If you build a new Empire and Crown yourself, you're it. I'm sure that at least one Priest could be found to sanctify the ceremony. There always seems to be at least one historically, lol.
That's a very cool video ! Based on the information I have received I'm rooting for Maria. And based on the pictures she's the one with most royal aura.
What I find crazy is that there have been multiple impostors pretending to be Princess Anastasia, which were apparently so notable that they made an animated movie about the whole thing. Fun fact: Anastasia's name comes from the Greek word for "resurrection," which sort of makes the idea of her having impostors somewhat more justified.
Imposters claiming to be long lost "murdered" princes or princesses is a very common theme in history and the Russian example is far from being unique -even in Russian history in the time of troubles we have the "False Dmitri" claiming to be the son of Ivan the Terrible and justifying the Polish invasion of Russia - in English history as well we have numerous examples - individuals claiming to be the murdered "princes in the Tower" and trying to overthrow the rule of king Henry VII - it's happened so often that you could call it a historical "meme."
@@kaloarepo288 good point, I know the False Dmitry stories and never made the connection, but I just think it’s a bit uncanny that it happened to a little girl whose name means “born again” (putting Jesus aside)
I too have my own indirect link to the Tsar & his family. A great-aunt of mine (who was the same age as Anastasia), was from the gardener family for the family. I grew up hearing first-hand stories of what the girls were like, particularly Anastasia, whom my great-aunt played with as kids. My great-aunt use to light up when she talked about her time growing up with the Romanovs. Never once said a single thing to disparage them as people, even Nicholas, she always spoke well of him as a great family man.
The question itself is really easy to answer, it is Andrew though it gets much much harder when you start thinking about who would be after Andrew and this video is basically all about that. Well made!
Yup, exactly. And people play right into that by getting too hung up on the 'rules', which OBVIOUSLY can and have changed in history. Even having a dynasty is an arbitrary choice. The Byzantine Roman empire had no dynasty but instead had a system of appointing successors. The Romanovs are done, they will not be reinstated. One look at this Maria woman, and it is obvious :)
Royal families have demonstrated an ability to adapt when they are close to running out of royal heirs. When the rules don't work anymore, they simply change the rules.
To be fair, the rules are usually set so that brothers, uncles, and sons all didn't start murdering each other every time the king dies. Big army diplomacy could overwrite that but opening that can of worms is usually a bad idea. Succession laws aren't suicide pacts after all.
@@brianboru2762 Well the rules have to change now. If the non morganatic marriage is still apart of the rules then in like 50 years there will be zero remaining Romanov candidates.
Exactly imagine an Empire being abolished because there were no "male heirs" like how does that matter?? If you have a daughter let her be the Queen at least your empire will carry on 🤦♂️
Stupid video it would be one of the kids descendants of the last Tsar. Just like Many royals where not previously murder, laws ignored and monarch denied their crown! the current british royals would not be the ones scrounging off the public in such ways on on old aged pensions!
@@uriargaman7241 Yes, but if we get an 'Empire of Russia' as a microstate, Russia will be the ONLY nation in the world to claim the title 'Largest and Smallest Nation in the World At the Same Time'.
My grandpa submitted DNA for a Y-Chromosome Genealogy testing project. They were able to up his genetic marker count recently and were running both it and several other samples. My grandpa shares a distant male ancestor with the Romanov family. DNA testing is pretty cool like that.
This channel helped me to decide on studying History in Uni. I was like "If I am sitting here watching long history videos for fun, then why not get a degree in History?" so thanks! lol.
Emack, what a testament to someone who influenced you, through his channel, into a major life course! I am surprised you never received a reply to your comment.
Some body sprad Rong information about Romanov family. Roman family been separated bat not killed Bolsheviks propaganda Alexei having a dohgter and she lives in Los Angeles she is 62 eyes old.
I have had the privilege of seeing/visiting the palace where Grand Duchess Olga lived in St. Petersburg after she married Peter of Oldenberg, and the house where shed died in utter poverty in Toronto, very near to where I live. She bore her greatly reduced circumstances with grace and dignity.
Her final residence was certainly reduced circumstances from her start. How the mighty fall! Of course, I'm descended from the English Plantagenet line, the Stuart Scottish line, and I'm descended from Philip "The Bold" king of France, and all that ancestry won't even get me a cup of coffee. 😕
You have done some in depth study. I love the way you presented the family pedigree by highlighting the lines of succession. You made following the lineage easy to follow. Thank you!
Maria has a son in Spain, and Maria's husband is a Prince of the Hohenzollern family, therefore making their son, George Mikhailovich Romanov, the great great grandson of Kaiser Wilhelm II. I think Maria and George have very strong claims to the House of Romanov. However, I'm not sure if George has any heirs of his own. I don't even think he's married and he's 39, so there's a chance the line might die with him.
Mara & George are working with the Orthodox church toward changing the rules to allow non-royals to marry into the family and their descendants to be able to succeed. If they go this route, I suspect the entirely of the family will cry foul! But George has a girlfriend he wants to marry. She recently converted to Orthodoxy, and Maria is looking for a way to make that happen.
Exactly, at some point you have to think that these misponounciations are to smear dirt over our language and culture, like it's obviously not pronounced with an "a".
@@mrsauceman5721 considering the lack of anything anti-Russian in previous videos and the presenters mispronounciation of other names etc it's more likely an error rather than a deliberate smear of you and your fellow Russians.
I always had a hard time undersatnding these boards, But the way you teach us nice slow voice and lighting up the picture of who you are speaking of. You are great❤ thank you very much be proud of your work because eventually your charts will show that I am the Queen of England😊😊😎
In 1991 I think it was, Vladimir and his grandson visited his birthplace in Porvoo, Finland. His parents had fled Russia in a horse drawn sleigh over the frozen waters and sought refuge at a friend’s manor house just outside the town. This place is today a famous hotel, spa, and restaurant and Vladimir could stay in the actual house of this birth. At the time my husband and I owned and managed the local radio station. Vladimir granted us an interview! So we spent a very nice afternoon with them at the manor. Vladimir was a gentle and soft spoken man, who loved his people and his greatest wish was to visit mother Russia. And later he got to do that! He told us about being raised as a future tsar, and his grandson was being educated in the same manner. He had no interest to rule and dominate, he just wanted to be an inspiring father figure to his people ...
What a wonderful story Marina. Let's hope they can work it out by majority votes for the next person to take on the roll of Head of the House of Romanov. They have seen enough turmoil for more infighting. And in my opinion it does not necessarily need to be a male
Kirill lost all rights to the throne when he declared his loyalty to the provisional government right before the addiction of Nicholas II. He broke his sworn oath to the crown, therefore he and his entire line are disqualified. Further, Kirill married Victoria Melita without permission of the tsar, they were first cousins and they were not married in a Russian Orthodox Church. Pauline Law was breached on three different counts on this marriage. This resulted in Kirill being banished from Russia (temporarily) and removed from succession. His name was stricken off the list. Nicholas later forgave Kirill for this marriage and reinstated him, however Kirill was NOT reinstated in the church records as being back in the succession line. Therefore, Kirill was not a legitimate claimant for two very good reasons. Thus, his son Vladimir and granddaughter the current Maria would have lost their succession rights as well due to Krill's violations. This branch are not legitimate claimants.
The Romanovs illegally seized the throne. The end of the family was a natural payment for the murders and the seizure of power. A separate topic is that they actively mixed blood with the German Kaisers. As a result, the Romanovs were not Russians by blood or spirit. The overthrow of the Germans from the throne was a matter of time.
@@IrkinsEselsior o come on, so you think British royalty has British blood? They acted smart and hence were spared and continued to rule, but they are not stupid enough to allow traitors to become claimant to throne, look at Edward 3
I had the opportunity to talk to Prince Paul Ilyinsky in the late-90s and asked if he ever considered himself an heir to the throne. He said he never thought much about it and more often thought about his time as a Marine Lt Colonel, because that was what he was more proud of. He seemed like a cool guy and was super nice to this inquisitive teen.
Talking about Grand Duches Maria's claims to russian crown, there's one not too well known, but technically quite essential detail. When her grandfather, Grand Duke Kirill, proclaimed himself emperor in exile, he decided to forgot one quiete significant episode from 1917 - the fact that in February 1917 he recognized the Provisional Government and nd the February Revolution BEFORE the abdication of Nicholas and his brother Mikhail. By that according to the laws of Russian Empire Grand Duke Kirill committed high treason and lost all possible rights to the throne.
@@dawnfire82 Yes and no: yes, final word belongs to monarch (but only in absolute monarchy), no - some general things (like participating in an uprising against monarch) that will be considered terason by anyone sane are written in laws and determined by them. Basically a word of an absolute monarch is a law, but since making all laws anew with every new monarch is impractical, they write down words of his preceedors and the new monarch also recognises them as laws.
UPDATE: I passed my exam lmao and then I went and got a 511 on my MCAT thanks y’all 😂❤️ (also, I’m not a pharmacist. I’m in undergrad) Me, should be studying for my pharmacology exam: I wonder who would be the current Tsar of Russia? 🧐
I purchased two of your charts (both excellent) ERFT - NE & ERFT - W. It would be informative to have a chart showing who the present day heirs are for the Houses of Hohenzollern (Germany/Prussia, Romania) , House of Hapsburg (Austria Hungary) and for the House of Bourbon (France) .
For Austria & HaBsburg (not sure why Murricans always say Hapsburg) it's Karl. A loser and repeated failure businessman, who finally managed to turn a profit by renting accomodation to the government for the "refugee" wave of 2015 and afterwards. For Hohenzollern it is Georg Friedrich Prinz von Preussen
Your chart is actually missing Grand Duchess Olga, Czar Nicholas II youngest sister. She survived and had 2 sons, whether her next of kin wanted and could’ve ruled is another matter, but you should’ve included her and her own lineage too.
@@peppersghosttheater well, ya - but don't forget, we decided to get rid of the Pauline rule! So they're cool! And from another vid I watched on Olga, she raised those boys right. I'm voting for one of them! Oops - I guess my vote doesn't count...
@@lee.m.506 I think the Pauline rule was still in place then and it's not retroactive. I hear you though. Where were they when she died. Any information I saw was she died alone ?
@@peppersghosttheater I don’t know. I wish I knew. I’d like to read and find out about her sons and hopefully they had children of their own. To my knowledge, Grand Duchess Olga was under the care of friends of hers when she passed. Perhaps, her kids are in Canada or Denmark?
Idk if you already have a video of the House of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha, but I really want one. In some point of the history they were in almost every great marriage of their time. England, Russia, Brazil, etc It's quite interesting
@@vincenttt8289 sorry, I don't have as much time free as you seem to have. This kind of content is just the one I consume for relax, because I find it interesting. If I had time to make comments that would help no one, I would definitely use it tl find more contet I find interesting instead. Have a good day.
@vincenttt Uh... it will still be very interesting to see an in-depth visual representation of how such a minor German House grew to be so prolific in Europe, so no, a simple Google search isn't enough
@@ქართველიქართველი-ჩ4ბ This is very interesting to read. I know little about the Georgian history, and given that you are a neighbour, it is not something to be proud of. Is there any serious political movement for a future restoration of the Bagrationi monarchy?
Since the revolution was a shock of great magnitude, comparable to the The Time of Troubles (Smuta) in Russia from 1598 to 1612, I believe that the search for candidates for the throne among the members of the deposed House of Romanov should be stopped. In my opinion, a new Zemsky Sobor should be held - a procedure during which the Romanov dynasty was brought to the throne, and a new ruling dynasty should be elected on it. There is another option: technically, we can use the precedent that took place after the suppression of the line of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, when power passed to the next oldest branch of the Rurikovich - Shuisky. From this, for example, it follows that technically the next oldest clan, the Odoevskiye, should have become tsars, but it was cut short in 1869. There are quite a lot of princely families descending from Rurik, and if you wish, you can establish which of the currently existing branches is the first in seniority at the moment. By the way, this is a rather interesting topic, I suggest the author of the channel to make a video about it.
@@johanpeturdam I remember in that video he mentioned that Romania "chose" to abolish their monarchy in 1948, when in reality there was a violent military coup and it became a communist dictatorship.
I can actually tell you a thing about it! In September I was in St. Petersburg, at the Yusupovs' museum-palace, where her grandfather lived, who participated in the murder of Rasputin. EVERY literally EVERY visitor, is told how Xenia, just arriving at the museum, found out that she was involved in this family. I doubt if this is completely true, but the story is interesting.
@@robertoa.m.3984 True you have a point there you could call him a modern Czar if you will which he is he will rule till his death all that's missing is the crown and that can be arrainged yeah:))
Our family have a photo album of our fore-bearers enjoying a summer holiday with the Romanov’s at one of their palaces. It is so tragic what happened to this family,
@@BaldrickisDead They were not despots, they were careless and naive, made a lot of bad decisions, but the amount of hurt they caused is nothing compared to what Lenin and Stalin caused.
@@99EKjohn what? Are the rulers of the Empire, the largest country on the planet, naive? Do you really think so? Well, if they were really naive, given their status, then it's good that they were overthrown before they finally ruined the country and lost everything that their ancestors and people worked so hard to create. but in general, I think they were rather stubborn conservatives and did not want to change to a changing world. for which they paid the price
I actually met and had dinner with The Grand Duchess Maria in 1994 in Madrid! Her son was also there and at the time Boris Yeltsin had recognised her and her son as the rightful heirs as other family members also were claimants. This lady was very regal and her English, Spanish and French were flawless. She told me many stories about European royalty. One story was of the funeral of the King of Norway where she was relegated to a room for defunct royals and therefore was ignored by our own Prince Phillip which amused and annoyed her as they are related. It was a surreal evening but we had quite a few Johnny Walkers and soda and she was great fun but so interesting and she hoped that her son would eventually become Tsar again.
Philip's great aunts were Empress Alexandra and Grand Duchess Elizabeth (Sergei) who were both killed by the Bolsheviks. That probably colored his feelings about those who survived the massacres. Although Maria's paternal grandmother was Victoria Melita of Edinburgh and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and thus a British princess, the Kyril branch was never close to the BRF. Kyril's niece was Marina, Duchess of Kent who married a British prince in 1936. (Queen Mary bought the Vladimir tiara from the children of her grandmother Grand Duchess Vladimir who died 1920). I think the Bagrations (Georgian ruling house) and the Dadianis (Mingrelia) were not regarded as equal by the mostly German ruling houses reigning 1800-1918. Again, that might have influenced how Maria was viewed by the BRF. Unfair but the Romanovs (1800-1946) never treated these former ruling houses as equals even though Tatiana, a great-granddaughter of Nicholas I, was allowed to marry a Bagration prince just before the First World War. But no Rusdian grand duke or prince was alliwed to marry a Georgian or Rurikid or Gedyminid (Lithuanian origin) princess. Or a Tatar origin princess either. I don't think I have ever seen photos of British royals interacting in public with the Romanov descendants. Nicholas II's sister Xenia and her children and grandchildren were largely ignored as well. Xenia was George V's first cousin too. I remember reading about Xenia's grandson Andrew (the 97 year old) being told off by phone for playing in the Frogmore gardens while the York princesses were there. I suspect they were treated as poor relations which they now were. To summarize, the BRF distanced itself from the Romanovs since 1917. I doubt that Maria Vladimorovna has been invited to BRF events. But the former reigning dynasties of Romanians, Bulgarians, Yugoslavs/Serbs, and Greeks were all represented at Philip's memorial service on 29th March. Margarita of Romania (granddaughter of Helen of Greece, a first cousin of Philip), Alexander of Yugoslavia (son of a first cousin Alexandra of Greece), Kyril of Bulgaria (son of a distant cousin Simeon II), Anne-Marie of the Hellenes (her husband Constantine II, son of a first cousin Paul/Pavlos I of the Hellenes) with two sons and their wives. But the BRF doesn't invite the Prussian royals or Habsburgs either.
Wow I am impressed by your wifes relationship to the official Czar's Photographer. I learned that my grandfather was the official bagpiper to the Laird of Butte, his brother Angus was the official bagpiper to Andrew Carnegie, and their father was the official bagpiper to the Clan Chief Cluny MacPherson! All these men are direct decendants of the macPherson piper who led the Clan into the Culloden battle. 1745. Family trees make history come alive.
If I had to drop either morganatic rule or male-line rule, I would probably drop morganatic rule which seems to be a very late introduction to succession concepts. I doubt the original rulers of Russia, the Rurikids would care much about the nobility of the mother. Some of them were even born to concubines. But they were concerned about the male-line. Also, you can't maintain the morganatic rule forever in modern day situations but you can track male line descent easier. My personal pick would be Rostislav btw since I think being aligned with the country and having male-line descent fits more to the original concept of kingship.
the problem is that the Romanovs aren't male line descendents, and the existence of Empress Elizabeth and Empress Catherine. It makes no sense to restrict them to the male line like in France.
@@Benkenobi8118 Well they are the male line descendants of Paul and Nicholas I at least. Maria's son is a Hohenzollern so the male line decendants of a Tzar is preferable I guess.
@@arad4852 Maria's son is a Romanov, the marriage between Maria and Franz Wilhelm of Prussia was a matrilineal one. He had to leave his protestant faith, his prussian titles, etc, to become an orthodox Grand Duke of Russia. There are papers that says that the children born from the marriage would be part of the Romanov dynasty, all of this with the approval of the Patriarch. After their divorse, Franz Wilhelm took back his name and prussian titles, when he was married to her his name was "Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich".
@@arad4852 Paul the First made a semi-salic succession system, if there aren't any male left or allowed to inherit the throne, then a female can become Empress.
Vraisment, Merci d'avoir expliqué ces lignées aux personnes qui se soucient encore de l'histoire. Il est assez important de connaître les têtes couronnées d'Europe et d'ailleurs.
Yup, can't watch a video video of his without noticing how wonderful it is! The dude has a perfect educator diction! He mentioned in some of the previous videos, if I recall correctly, that he had the educator career somewhere outside the Anglosphere, Sri Lanka I think, so I guess this is where he mastered this impeccable diction, so he may be clearly understood not depending on the recipients' language level. It's just my theory why his manner of speech is so clear, I might be wrong. Nevertheless, much appreciated, it kinda optimizes the "brain RAM" used for understanding, and allows a listener to listen and think simultaneously.
I'm afraid I totally disagree with you on your choice of Princess Maria Vladimirovna as next Empress of Russia. As has been pointed out earlier, her grandparents, Kirill and Victoria were first cousins, which is against Orthodox law. In addition Victoria was a divorcee which didn't go well at the time. We must also remember Kirill's disloyalty to Nicholas II at the time of the revolution, and his mother's backstabbing and plotting against both Nicholas and Alexandra in the years leading up to the revolution. The Vladimirs always wanted the throne. At the time of the Borki train disaster in 1888 when Alexander III and his family were almost killed, Alexander III is reputed to have said "Won't Vladimir be disappointed" Maria's son, Prince George, who is in fact a Prince of Prussia, was married just over a week ago to an Italian lass named Rebecca Bettarini, the daughter of a diplomat. Her family is not of royal or even noble descent, although Maria Vladimirovna has seen fit to ennoble them which she has no right to do. They look a nice couple and I wish them well, but really, its all so pretentious! Other Romanov descendants don't carry on this way, Its a decision to be made by the Russian people, who at this stage at least, seem reluctant for the monarchy to return.
I think that there was a stipulation that women could not inherit the throne. If a woman is allowed to claim the crown, then retroactively the daughters of the czars would have caused the line of succession to vary.
Kirill marched with the revolutionaries in 1917, wearing a red band on his arm when Nicholas was overthrown, he was a coup, he hoped to be appointed by the provisional government as the new Czar. Nicholas's mother disapproved of Kirill, and claimed that he was expelled from the line of succession along with his descendants for high treason to Emperor Nicholas II. Maria has already given many statements where she despises Nicholas II and her children, when she hears the exhumation of the bodies recently, they called her to attend a ceremony, she did not want to go, saying that the last reigning Emperor was not of her family. She doesn't even care about the legacy of the last Emperor, just like her grandfather Kirill and great-grandfather Vladimir, she has her eye only on the crown. Vladimir always envied Alexander III and his descendants, Vladimir and Kirill considered themselves more worthy than Nicholas. There are several texts relating to this ambition of the Vladimir lineage
Thanks for a fascinating video. I fully agree with you on who is the best candidate - your argument of why was what I was thinking myself while listening to your video.
You seem to be confusing nobles (Maria's mother was Princess Bagration) and royals. A non-morganatic marriage in this case would mean it was between two royals, not nobles. Nobles were considered commoners by royalty. Both Princess Diana and Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, were commoners even though both were daughters of earls. Emperor Alexander II's 2nd marriage was morganatic even though his wife was a princess: she was from a noble family, not royal family. I never understood why if Paul I changed the rules of succession, a later Emperor couldn't change it back. Grand Duke Kirill's wife was not German. She was the ex-wife of Ernest of Hesse and by Rhine, but was the daughter of Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh (2nd son of Queen Victoria) and Grand Duchess Marie Alexandrovna of Russia (daughter of Alexander II and sister of Kirill's father).
that would be interesting. Seems the Bagrationi house split in three centuries ago, but recently a man from one line married a woman from another, thus effectively reuniting the two most senior lines. The head of the Orthodox Church in Georgia is even calling for their son to be crowned King.
Me who has not listened to Anastasia (Broadway) in a very very long time : "ah yes, the princess Anastasia Romanov who lived and ran away in Paris with derek klena"
Hello, You explain well matters which usually can get confusing. Here is still a suggestion to make your presentations even better: When somebody looks at your genealogical charts on a regular size smartphone the individual images of persons and their names are in fact close to indistinguishable. This is a pitty. You can please explore how to zoom into the larger picture to make the portrait photo of the person you just talk about much larger and many viewers very happy. I am sure there is a way to do the zoom effect with a bit of additional effort. One way can be that you simply include a cut out image of the genealogical tree each time you talk about a particular person long enough. I will now have a look at your other videos. P.S. in this video you could have mentioned just for general information, that with Peter the Great having children with a former communer and house maid the rule of morganatic or not was at the discretion of the Tsar. Therefore all claimants to the throne who followed are supposed to be the descendants of a woman who started as a maid and not much is known about her ancestry. Maybe you can also explore a bit the situation created by the designation of Michael by his older brother in 1917 in the abdication text. The ensuing decision of Michael to "let the people vote for a Tsar" is indeed still a valid legal act. 100% up to now. Because the Provisional Government of Russia was based on the free decision of Michael to sign that document in 1917 to let the People of Russia decide. Kerenski maybe tried to outsmart everybody, but this doesn't change the fact that Michael's decision was rightful and legal. (Not to forget that even Nikolas II and his family lived under the regime of the Provisional Government). Michael got his power from the Tsar who is supposed to have this position through God, and Michael who was more down to Earth in the approach gave his People a time to make choices about the future. The criminal Gang of Lenin overthrow the ailing legitimate Provisional Government and everything that followed is only founded on this illegal toppling in 1917 of the last 100 % legitimate Regime (Kerenski & Co) . Including the USSR and Russian Federation today which are fruits and descendants of the Lenin coup and not of the last Tsar's rightful decisions. To restaure full "rights" according to the former Monarchy, the Plebiscite wanted by Michael, sabotaged by the Bolchevics should take place. And in such a free voting for monarchy or not or whatever, the question who is going to be the next Tsar or Tsarina is also a choice to be made by the People.
@@lauragolub Saints whose misfortune it was to have really bad timing. Heartbreakingly bad timing. Nicholas II and his wife and children were paying for so much for which they were not responsible. A true tragedy.
But what if instead of restoring Romanovs on the throne, Russia (for some inexplicable reason) decided to restore Rurik's descendants (or Rurikids) to the throne of Russia? That would be an interesting video to watch.
Вообще, автор не учёл такую особенность российского престолонаседия как призыв на царствование. Земский Собор имеет полное право (и в русской историографии подобные случаи описаны не раз) по итогам голосования призвать кандидата на престол. Так было с Михаилом Романовым, несмотря на то, что имелось множество других предтендентов из дома Рюриковичей. И так может в любой момент случится с любым другим государственным мужем. Даже с Путиным.
@@tyvgot1367 да, но Путин не имеет никакой связи ни с Рюриковичами, ни с Романовыми. Того же Михаила назначили потому что его двоюродная бабка была женой Ивана Грозного. Так что косвенная связь есть. У Путина её нет.
@@grach_03 почитайте про избрание Михаила. Там кандидатов была уйма и самым главным конкурентом был английский король, которого хотели избрать просто потому, что он одной веры с ними. Англиканство долгое время считалось формой православия.
@@tyvgot1367 эм, англиканство - форма православия? Признаюсь, слышу впервые. Кандидатура Якова I только выдвигалась и то, была многими не поддержана, потому что все помнили Семибоярщину и иностранцев в Москве. К тому же, была она выдвигнута кем то из новгородцев, которые в случае чего получили бы большие преверенции от англичан. Тем более из иностранцев также выдвигалась кандидатуры польского и шведского принцев. Но их не поддержали из-за их интервенции в Смуту. Михаил был идеальной кандидатурой , потому что какие никакие связи с прошлой династией имел, его отец был сторонником Лжедмитрия, да и сам Михаил ничего плохого как и хорошего во время Смуты не делал. Идеальная нейтральная кандидатура. Тем более ему тогда было всего 16 лет. Его отец был в тюрьме в Польше и принял постиг. Так что Михаил был идеальной кандидатурой для бояр.
@@grach_03 тем не менее, Михаил был избран не потому, что имел какие-то связи с рюриковичами, отнюдь. Да, связь с рюриками позволила ему в принципе быть кандидатом, но если бы это было главным критерием, то выбрали бы каких-нибудь князей Боголюбских или Орловых, или Долгоруковых, которые были прямыми потомками Рюрика. Якову быть потенциальным царём не мешало отсутствие связей с Иваном Грозным. Здесь сыграли факторы именно политической конъюнктуры: Михаил был самым выгодным. И если выгодным окажется кто-нибудь из нынешних политиков, будьте уверены, что его изберут несмотря ни на что.
You forgot to mention Nicholas's sister Olga - her son's probably don't qualify since she married a commoner but she should have at least been mentioned if you bring up Xenia
I heard years ago that the Romanov fortune was secured in the Chase Manhattan Bank, which was apparently the habit of many royal families, namely to have the family fortune somewhere other than at "home" as it were. If this tidbit of history is true, I rather think the governors of Chase Manhattan would seriously contend anyone who came forth to claim the Romanov throne, as the Bank then would have to produce said fortune. If one believes in "follow the money" than one could well ask what role the Rockefeller family had in the Revolution of 1917.. history if allowed to be told accurately, is truly a curious thing....who knows? The supposed heir could end up being a majority stock holder in Chase if the fortune was never removed.....
Don't believe that rumor. It's not true. There is no Romanov money in any bank. During World War I Tsar Nicholas withdrew all of his money from banks all over the world and used it to build and staff military hospitals in Russia. When he died he was worth almost nothing. What little was left was seized by the Bolsheviks.
My family are actually the descendants of Adolphe Thiers, the guy who ruled during the third republic! Was kinda neat to see his face during the video!
I really find family trees interesting, especially royal family tree 😍 Might I suggest a video about the "Spencer" family tree, the late Princess Diana's family.
My maternal grandfather was a Fredericks/Freedericksz/Фредерикс (spelled several ways depending on how whichever branch of the family wanted to spell it and which country they lived in) who was the last Minister of the Imperial Court of Russia. Count Fredericks/Freedericksz/Фредерикс was his cousin. Buried in Finland. SUOMI
During the February Revolution of 1917, Kirill marched to the Tauride Palace at the head of the Garde Equipage (Marine Guard) to swear allegiance to the Russian Provisional Government, wearing a red band on his uniform. Kirill had authorised the flying of a red flag over his palace on Glinka Street in Petrograd and in correspondence with a Romanov relative claimed credit for "saving the situation by my recognition of the Provisional Government". It is probable that he had hoped that by ingratiating himself with the Provisional Government he would be declared regent after Nicholas II was made to abdicate. It was the Provisional Government that overthrew the Tzar, and my supporting that Government Kirill supported the action against the Tzar. This is treason against the Tzar, and that makes him and his descendents trown out. And Maria is NOT a Grand Duchess. The last Grand Duchess of Russia was Grand Duchess Olga.
But didn't Tzar Nicolas forgive him, therefore pardoning him? And you could argue that the church didn't forgive him, but Maria has the churches support. So that claim has no holding
"It all started with the Russian February Revolution of 1917, which resulted in the Provisional Government coming to power in Russia. Emperor Nicholas I abdicated and so did his brother Mikhail, and the full power of the emperor passed to the Provisional Government. On April 12 (according to the new calendar) 1917, the Provisional Government adopted the regulation "On the Provisional Order of the Administrative Government and Local Government of the Estonian Governorate", on the basis of which both the Estonian Governorate and the Estonian Region of the Livonian Governorate were merged into one Estonian Governorate." - Uno Trumm, historian A lot of things happened after that, but long story short - We can say that the Republic of Estonia is connected to the Russian Empire by the umbilical cord and is juridically its sole legal heir.
@@themightyeagle21no, Nicholas was outraged by Kirill's act and Nicholas was heard by quite a few people saying that Kirill had committed "treason". That automatically rules out Kirill and all his heirs.
Fuck DA Putin, we Russians are proud people with more than 1000 years of history. Enough of usurpers, we need freedom and prosperity like other European contries! Too bad that Putin destroyed all the democratic institues, made them his puppets :(
An excellent video as allways. Today I have a petition tho. Could you pleaaaaase make a video about the Mexican Imperial families? Both the Iturbide and Habsburg. I've tried for a bit to do it by myself but you're a professional so. I would love to watch a video about that. Thanks. Great content
Although I was a World History teacher for many years, I'm still confused about the rightful line of succession. I'm just saddened about those events of 1917.
The issue with a morganatic marriage is that everyone agrees any children will inherit their mother's status, not their father's. Likewise, the wife doesn't have the same status as her husband. Nothing else changes, the children are legitimate, they just don't inherit titles and rank from their father. This is why a morganatic marriage, a legal and not a social description, breaks the line of succession, when semi-agnatic does not. Love your channel. I can indulge almost all my obsessions here.
Which is also why Harry and Meghan’s marriage is not morganatic, as Meghan became a Duchess upon their marriage and their children were granted the title of Prince(ss) when Charles ascended the throne.
Je suis passionnée d’Histoire Russe. Ma Famille ayant eu des relations avec les Grands Exilés Russes en France et Celle-ci, ayant toujours aimé et soutenu les Exilés. Aussi cette Culture avec la mienne m’a toujours été proche et sensible. ❤️🇷🇺❤️
I recall a few years ago reading an obituay for a house painter in Melbourne, who was descended from the Romonovs. He was described as well respected and humble. I'll see if I can find it
There is a book in which Prince Michael of Kent becomes Tsar of Russia. He is related to them, knows a lot about Russia and speaks Russian. He also looks a lot like Nicholas II
@@ausbrum Can't you make your point without resorting to childish name calling? I'm unfamiliar with the woman, so just inform me what is so bad about her and leave off the slurs from the school yard. I guess if the former president can behave that way, he becomes the role model for all the unwarranted social incivility and outrage.
By the Russian crowning laws YOU HAVE TO BE crowned by the Patriarch (or rather in Russian times Metropolitan) of Moscow, thus only the one who has the support of the Church and patriarch can be Imperator and Tsar. All others who don't have the support of the Church, that meaning the patriarchy, are illegitimate. That is the rule that has often been forgotten when discussed this topic, since it was never actually officially writen down in state succession rules, although it is in Church ones and in crowning rules (although I might be wrong about the crowning rules, since those changed a lot overtime). That's why Useful Charts is right that only Maria can be the rightful Imperator. As for the Emperor/Tsar dispute over name of the title, it's actually very interesting. You see, Russian "Emperors" were both Tsars and Imperators! What does that mean? Well, let me explain. Since Russian rulers considered themselves to be the legitimate successors of the Byzantine/Roman emperors there arose one problem-about the title. You see, in the middle ages, up until the Charlemagne, it is considered that there can be only one true Emperor title ruler-the Roman one. It wasn't just the highest ruling title as we see it today, it meant that that person, the Basileus in Constantinople, is the literal God's representative on the Earth, thus ruling not only above the subjects of his Empire, but OVER ALL THE HUMANS, or at least all the Christians! Giving that he is proclaimed to be literally "equal to the apostles" he had one another important duty - taking care of the fate. You see in Byzantium/Eastern Rome it wasn't patriarch that was heading the Church, it was Emperors. They had the power to basically do whatever they wanted with the Church: they were appointing patriarchs, they were writing church laws, HECK they were so powerful that they could even decide how the Jesus looked like! In fact the reason that Jesus is today depicted with a beard is because since the beginning of the 7th century Byzantine Emperors started wearing beards themselves, as before that neither the Byzantine emperors had it nor was the Jesus represented on the icons with beard! The same thing was in the West, but there it caused the fight for the investiture between Popes and the HRE (Holly Roman Empire) emperors over the position who is actually the head of the entire Christian world. At the end in the 13th century, the Popes won and thus the Emperors were "theoretically" subservient to them (the best proof that it wasn't practically always the case was Charles V 1527 sacking of Rome). But, back to the Russian Emperors. As I said, they were both Imperators and Tsars. Tsar was basically the rank of Emperor. But what was then Imperator? Well it was a rank ABOVE the rank of Emperor! You see the Byzantines at the end had to agree to the sad reality that there cannot be only one Christian Emperor. Thus they acknowledged the existence of HRE emperors in 812, Bulgarian Emperors in 917 and Serbian Emperors in 1350. But there was a trick! They acknowledged them not as the Roman, which at that time meant universal, but as their NATIONAL (consider the term national vaguely, since nationalism wasn't yet a thing) emperors. So Charlemagne was only the Emperor of the Franks, Simeon only the Emperor of Bulgarians and Dušan the mighty as the Emperor of the Serbs, while only the Emperor in Constantinople was the ruler above them all and ruler of all Christians. Now, since Russian ruler took completely, to the last detail, the Byzantine imperial ideology, they too considered themselves as something above just the Emperors of the Russians (and also gained the "right" to decide the church laws and other religious stuff). That particularly came into the effect during the rule of Peter the Great when Russians started slowly mingling to the world stage as one of the most powerful countries in the world. He, as a boss that he was, added to his already existing title of Tsar the title of Imperator in 1721. Thus Tsar was a national title of the Russians, while Imperator, the title above the Emperor one, was considered as the on representing the ruler over all the Christians or at this phase over all Orthodox Christians! That was particularly important since Russians were for centuries aiming at liberation of the Orthodox Christians occupied by the Ottomans and other Empires. At the end they succeeded in liberating those Christians, but it did kinda cost them the whole Empire, soooo......yeah, it was only partially worth it.
well after Peter the Great all the Romanovs actually crowned THEMSELVES since there was no more Patriarchs to crown them. meaningful though, that they crushed, and never restored, patriarchs, and were crushed themselves in their due time,
@@decorde-taccard I know that Patriarchs crowned the emperors. It s only that after Peter the Great Russia did not have a Patriarch, as Church was part of state bureaucratic system, so Nicholas could not be crowned, and just crowned himself, and his spouse.
I don't know if he's still alive but there was someone here in Canada, in Richmond Hill Ontario, who claimed he was a direct descendant to the last Tsar. I can't remember his name. I saw him interviewed on a local news broadcast. He didn't speak a word of Russian. Also, the Grand Duchess Olga, the last person to be born from a ruling monarch, Alexander II, died here in Toronto Ontario in 1960. Her older brother, of course, went on to become Nicholas II.
Royal genealogy is a bit complicated for some of us, so his talking pace give us time to understand titles, who’s he talking about, remember some historical facts, etc.
@@taketomo6520 Oh absolutely! I certainly wasn't complaining. It's great we can adjust the speed to suit our own listening style. Useful for videos in a language we are less confident in, detailed content etc. Very helpful.
Vladimir Vladimirovich would be Vladimir IV if he accepted the throne, as there were 3 Rurikid Grand Princes named Vladimir/Volodymir before the Tsardom of Muscovy.
@@Account-jn7xu And the tsars weren't? I mean, in paper Nicky 2nd had a Duma after the russo-japanese war, but of course it didn't really restrict his power. They were also cruel dictators, maybe they would still be on the throne if they had modernized.
@@MopaHa13булкой похрустеть. Ответ на вопрос видео - кто бы мог претендовать на Русский трон - н͇и͇к͇т͇о͇. "Les aristocrates a la lanterne! Les aristocrates on les pendra!"
Thank you for bringing up the DNA evidence that all of Nicholas' kids were dead. I still keep seeing people referring to someone as one of his kids, living today / dying recently.
Its a reference to the Hoi4 mod "The New Order" where a guy called Taboritsy can take over russia and believes that Alexei will return when he has Purified Russia, so he pulls a Gamer move and kills everyone.
The so-called DNA evidence that all of the children died in 1918 is based on approx 40 "shards of bone" half of which could not even be identified as being human. As one of the shards showed evidence of being from a female the others were simply assumed to be male thus accounting for the two missing skeletons from the mass grave. It was recorded that the death squad butchers actually chopped the bodies to bits and attempted to dissolve them with acid before they dumped the remains down the mineshaft, the shards of bone no doubt came from the location where they did their US Federal Reserve funded vile deed.
@@karenjane7762 never knew US Federal Reserve was doing its vile dids in a pitmine 10 kms north-west of Ekaterinburg, Russia. I guess, literally opposite side of the planet is a good place to hide.
The author of this video forgot that Nicholas II sisters survived the revolution and both had sons . They would be to me more eligible than any one else .
@@PtolemyXVII Wait, you're saying his children survived the revolution and had kids? Their bodies have been found tho thats a conspiracy theory, just like the Anastasia one. They all were murdered
I think the 3 strongest claims to the throne are Andrew (and his kids), Maria, and Dmitri. Personally if I had to choose I would pick Andrew as I feel like he would be most likley picked by the Romanovs pre 1918. Vladimir may have been the last undisputed head of house, but Andrew fallows all of the rules, so his children would be closest related to the legitimate heir.
Karl is the chosen because he does follows the male rule.. Then María because she follows the Orthodox rule and Rotislav who is man and Orthodox but not recognized by the church
I'm a Canadian who lives in Ontario. In the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto I saw a large crystal object on display that belonged to the Russian Royal Family and was smuggled out of the country during the Revolution. I can't remember what the object was as I saw it a decade ago, but I want to say that it was a vase.
You forgot Nicholas II sister Olga who had 2 sons. Also, Michael abdicated in favor of the Russian people. Kirill had given up his titles and sided with the red army, going so far as to fly the red flag outside his palace. Alexandra saw it from Tsarskoe Selo and was furious. So how can someone who gave up their titles to still have their family line inherit?
They were forced to give up their titles for they value more of their lives Murderers cud have killed their entire race,giving up their titles had saved them
Andrew Romanoff did marry the daughter of a nobleman. His first wife was Elena Konstantinovna Durnova, daughter of Konstantin Afanasievich Durnova. The family of Durnova is a noble family name from Russia so a claim could be made that she is nobility as well even if it goes back a few generations. Since Andrew Romanoff died in 2021. His position as head of the Romanoff family could go to his only son with Elena, Alexis Andreevich Romanov.
I was born in Finland. My grandfather, born in 1895 (Finland was back then a Grandutchy of Russia), lived and served in the army quite near the Russian border, and for reasons I have never known, got some of the furniture of the Romanovs, including a piano, which my family then gave to a local museum.
I remember for instance the chairs, all of them carrying the Romanov seal underneath. They have always fascinated me very much, and God knows where these items have ended up after my grandparents died.
Major world history mixed up with little personal stories.
How many chairs? 12? 😝
Your last phrase is great, man!
@Gladiator Max6 it's an inside joke only Russians (and ex soviet citizens) would understand, also it would be rather lame to explain it.
that kinda makes sense. A lot of descents from tsar family were escaping from soviets, that's how a bunch of stuff ended up in different countries.
you know, in Yekaterinburg the Romanovs had a piano in the house there where they were staying, which was confiscated before they were murdered..
I really want a tiny artificial island in the Mediterranean with some old guy on it yelling "I AM THE EMPEROR OF RUSSIA"
I'm just surprised there *are* international waters in the med. I assumed it was small enough for the bordering countries to have adjoining national waters...
that technically exists, a Russian businessman bought a small island off of Africa a few years ago, claiming it for the Russian Empire
That moment your grandpa is friends with the only claiment left that ticks all the boxes
I like this idea, but I think that other guy should be king
Me too! I'm really surprised a Caribbean Island doesn't offer the throne just for the tourism value.
“And she is recognized by the Russian Orthodox Church” that’s literally the only thing that matters
This
Karl Emich is the only one making an effort to be a head of state, that's gotta count for something
@@iamdigory Yes. If you build a new Empire and Crown yourself, you're it. I'm sure that at least one Priest could be found to sanctify the ceremony. There always seems to be at least one historically, lol.
@@_Abjuranax_ Actually, only a bishop would be able to perform the rite.
@@grigoriitorkel2485 Sorry, but you are probably correct. It has been awhile since I have Crowned myself Emperor, and I may have forgot, lol.
That's a very cool video ! Based on the information I have received I'm rooting for Maria. And based on the pictures she's the one with most royal aura.
"Most of the photos of the Russian imperial family you've seen were taken by my cousins-thrice-removed-in-law" is the best flex I've heard in a while
By the way, all of the family, especially the children, of N II had one common hobby - photography.
George V was not born to be king. His elder brother, the Duke of Clarence, died at the age of 28. The notorious Duke of Clarence.
@@tinadooley6135 I think maybe you replied to the wrong comment, lol. Great info though
@@zozzy4630
Sorry about that lol!!
This made me laugh! :)
What I find crazy is that there have been multiple impostors pretending to be Princess Anastasia, which were apparently so notable that they made an animated movie about the whole thing. Fun fact: Anastasia's name comes from the Greek word for "resurrection," which sort of makes the idea of her having impostors somewhat more justified.
I am King James, Am I a imposter? Being King and being recognized is two different things. You are what they want you to be, Equal.
Imposters claiming to be long lost "murdered" princes or princesses is a very common theme in history and the Russian example is far from being unique -even in Russian history in the time of troubles we have the "False Dmitri" claiming to be the son of Ivan the Terrible and justifying the Polish invasion of Russia - in English history as well we have numerous examples - individuals claiming to be the murdered "princes in the Tower" and trying to overthrow the rule of king Henry VII - it's happened so often that you could call it a historical "meme."
@@kaloarepo288 good point, I know the False Dmitry stories and never made the connection, but I just think it’s a bit uncanny that it happened to a little girl whose name means “born again” (putting Jesus aside)
@@kitcutting "Anastasia" in Greek actually means "resurrected." -male form is "Anastasius" -the resurrected one (Jesus.)
she would be 122 years old by now, so time for impostors was over a long time ago.
I too have my own indirect link to the Tsar & his family. A great-aunt of mine (who was the same age as Anastasia), was from the gardener family for the family. I grew up hearing first-hand stories of what the girls were like, particularly Anastasia, whom my great-aunt played with as kids. My great-aunt use to light up when she talked about her time growing up with the Romanovs. Never once said a single thing to disparage them as people, even Nicholas, she always spoke well of him as a great family man.
it's a shame they all had to be executed
@@bittersweet3469 They didn't 'have to be executed'.
They were murdered by political thugs.
@@ErenThorne They tried to run, but they didn't have anywhere to go
@@ladyjanegrey1671 he didn't try shit
@@ErenThorne Do some more research.
The question itself is really easy to answer, it is Andrew though it gets much much harder when you start thinking about who would be after Andrew and this video is basically all about that. Well made!
"this is not an easy question"
Bolsheviks: *THAT'S THE POINT*
LMFAOO
That's real. They killed them and their children so no one could claim the throne
Yup, exactly. And people play right into that by getting too hung up on the 'rules', which OBVIOUSLY can and have changed in history. Even having a dynasty is an arbitrary choice. The Byzantine Roman empire had no dynasty but instead had a system of appointing successors. The Romanovs are done, they will not be reinstated. One look at this Maria woman, and it is obvious :)
LOL 😅🤣 true tho
@peter smythe oh my days man😂😂😂😂😂
Royal families have demonstrated an ability to adapt when they are close to running out of royal heirs. When the rules don't work anymore, they simply change the rules.
To be fair, the rules are usually set so that brothers, uncles, and sons all didn't start murdering each other every time the king dies. Big army diplomacy could overwrite that but opening that can of worms is usually a bad idea. Succession laws aren't suicide pacts after all.
@@brianboru2762 Well the rules have to change now. If the non morganatic marriage is still apart of the rules then in like 50 years there will be zero remaining Romanov candidates.
Exactly imagine an Empire being abolished because there were no "male heirs" like how does that matter?? If you have a daughter let her be the Queen at least your empire will carry on 🤦♂️
Stupid video it would be one of the kids descendants of the last Tsar. Just like Many royals where not previously murder, laws ignored and monarch denied their crown! the current british royals would not be the ones scrounging off the public in such ways on on old aged pensions!
@@harryy7918 When that happens a new council decides on the new dynasty line
If the micronation island takes off then Russia will be the only nation in the world that is simultaneously the largest in the world AND the smallest.
It's already the only one that is the largest.
depends how big they make it.
@@uriargaman7241 Yes, but if we get an 'Empire of Russia' as a microstate, Russia will be the ONLY nation in the world to claim the title 'Largest and Smallest Nation in the World At the Same Time'.
@@jbshiva865 Except they plan to call it "Romanov Empire" not "Russia"
Would this be like Galt’s Gulch?
My grandpa submitted DNA for a Y-Chromosome Genealogy testing project. They were able to up his genetic marker count recently and were running both it and several other samples. My grandpa shares a distant male ancestor with the Romanov family. DNA testing is pretty cool like that.
💖
how distant exactly?
@@marcusaurelius4941 I'm unsure. I'd have to ask my mom, since she's the one who keeps up with that.
From my maternal great Great grandmother I also have a very distant Romanov ancestry, ill have to do a DNA test tho to see who it is.
And then you woke up
This channel helped me to decide on studying History in Uni. I was like "If I am sitting here watching long history videos for fun, then why not get a degree in History?" so thanks! lol.
I did similar after falling in love with doing family genealogy!
I'm studying now for my teachers certification Social Studies 7-12.
Emack, what a testament to someone who influenced you, through his channel, into a major life course! I am surprised you never received a reply to your comment.
Some body sprad Rong information about Romanov family.
Roman family been separated bat not killed
Bolsheviks propaganda
Alexei having a dohgter and she lives in Los Angeles she is 62 eyes old.
If Alexis II had a daughter, she would be born in 30s or early 40s
I have had the privilege of seeing/visiting the palace where Grand Duchess Olga lived in St. Petersburg after she married Peter of Oldenberg, and the house where shed died in utter poverty in Toronto, very near to where I live. She bore her greatly reduced circumstances with grace and dignity.
The home where Grand Duchess died is 716 Gerrard Street East, Toronto. I have made a pilgrimage there on the anniversary of her death.
@@davidobrien8349 unfortunately now it's because chinese neighborhood.
Concept of Royal family is outdated
@@turuus5215 Never will be
Her final residence was certainly reduced circumstances from her start. How the mighty fall! Of course, I'm descended from the English Plantagenet line, the Stuart Scottish line, and I'm descended from Philip "The Bold" king of France, and all that ancestry won't even get me a cup of coffee. 😕
Note to self: Ask your next girlfriend about her great grandfather's cousins.
@Sim Nik No, girl-friend must be from a noble family of equal rank - preferably still ruling.
Dude I straight up clicked this video cause my girlfriends family descends from the Russian tsar!
There’s an adoption up the line so it wouldn’t count but a man can still dream
@@chrisanschau8169 So you support your girlfriend to become Russian tsar
@@patp3634 what are you the KGB?
You have done some in depth study. I love the way you presented the family pedigree by highlighting the lines of succession. You made following the lineage easy to follow. Thank you!
Last time I was this early, Nicholas ii was getting tattoos in Japan
Bruh
He was specifically getting his lips tattooed by Ainu women on the Kuril Islands
And his head was sliced off
And he wanted milk and snuggles before he went to bed
@@Belgisch_Monarchist1831 Now more than ever
Maria has a son in Spain, and Maria's husband is a Prince of the Hohenzollern family, therefore making their son, George Mikhailovich Romanov, the great great grandson of Kaiser Wilhelm II. I think Maria and George have very strong claims to the House of Romanov. However, I'm not sure if George has any heirs of his own. I don't even think he's married and he's 39, so there's a chance the line might die with him.
assuming he doesn't die anytime soon, being 39 and single does not mean that you can't/won't have children with a spouse at some point
@@woody4077 Prince Albert II of Monaco was 54 when he got married and had kids, ignoring his bastards, George could get a young wife like him.
@@yourfake915 YUPE
@@donijaya "easier said then done" to quote a cliche
Mara & George are working with the Orthodox church toward changing the rules to allow non-royals to marry into the family and their descendants to be able to succeed. If they go this route, I suspect the entirely of the family will cry foul! But George has a girlfriend he wants to marry. She recently converted to Orthodoxy, and Maria is looking for a way to make that happen.
Not sure how you came to the decision that 'Kirill' was pronounced 'Kayrill'.
*Keereel.
Exactly, at some point you have to think that these misponounciations are to smear dirt over our language and culture, like it's obviously not pronounced with an "a".
Cyril or Kirill. And you are right.
@@mrsauceman5721 considering the lack of anything anti-Russian in previous videos and the presenters mispronounciation of other names etc it's more likely an error rather than a deliberate smear of you and your fellow Russians.
Yeah, my ears are still bleeding from that.
I always had a hard time undersatnding these boards, But the way you teach us nice slow voice and lighting up the picture of who you are speaking of. You are great❤ thank you very much be proud of your work because eventually your charts will show that I am the Queen of England😊😊😎
In 1991 I think it was, Vladimir and his grandson visited his birthplace in Porvoo, Finland. His parents had fled Russia in a horse drawn sleigh over the frozen waters and sought refuge at a friend’s manor house just outside the town. This place is today a famous hotel, spa, and restaurant and Vladimir could stay in the actual house of this birth. At the time my husband and I owned and managed the local radio station. Vladimir granted us an interview! So we spent a very nice afternoon with them at the manor. Vladimir was a gentle and soft spoken man, who loved his people and his greatest wish was to visit mother Russia. And later he got to do that! He told us about being raised as a future tsar, and his grandson was being educated in the same manner. He had no interest to rule and dominate, he just wanted to be an inspiring father figure to his people ...
Nice little story there! Don't suppose you have any recording of this?
his daughter and his grandson do not speak Russian ((
What a wonderful story Marina. Let's hope they can work it out by majority votes for the next person to take on the roll of Head of the House of Romanov. They have seen enough turmoil for more infighting. And in my opinion it does not necessarily need to be a male
An interesting and touching story.
May I ask, are you talking about the haikko manor spa hotel in porvoo ?
Very lovely story! :)
I searched about the tsars before a week ago- now I'm extremely interested in russian history. It was helpful. Thanks a bunch!
GeoHistory Russia
Kirill lost all rights to the throne when he declared his loyalty to the provisional government right before the addiction of Nicholas II. He broke his sworn oath to the crown, therefore he and his entire line are disqualified.
Further, Kirill married Victoria Melita without permission of the tsar, they were first cousins and they were not married in a Russian Orthodox Church. Pauline Law was breached on three different counts on this marriage. This resulted in Kirill being banished from Russia (temporarily) and removed from succession. His name was stricken off the list. Nicholas later forgave Kirill for this marriage and reinstated him, however Kirill was NOT reinstated in the church records as being back in the succession line. Therefore, Kirill was not a legitimate claimant for two very good reasons. Thus, his son Vladimir and granddaughter the current Maria would have lost their succession rights as well due to Krill's violations. This branch are not legitimate claimants.
Glad you said that, absolutely hate kiril
The Romanovs illegally seized the throne. The end of the family was a natural payment for the murders and the seizure of power. A separate topic is that they actively mixed blood with the German Kaisers. As a result, the Romanovs were not Russians by blood or spirit. The overthrow of the Germans from the throne was a matter of time.
Lenin seized the throne by conquest, overruling and ending any Romanov claim to the succession.
@@IrkinsEselsior o come on, so you think British royalty has British blood? They acted smart and hence were spared and continued to rule, but they are not stupid enough to allow traitors to become claimant to throne, look at Edward 3
@@IrkinsEselsior the Romanovs INHERITED the throne their end was them being WRONGFULLY SLAUGHTERED and you’re clearly wishing you’re them
This was so entertaining and educational at the same time. Thank you!
I had the opportunity to talk to Prince Paul Ilyinsky in the late-90s and asked if he ever considered himself an heir to the throne. He said he never thought much about it and more often thought about his time as a Marine Lt Colonel, because that was what he was more proud of. He seemed like a cool guy and was super nice to this inquisitive teen.
His mother was a commoner already an American veteran with children. No one in the ROC called on him. He was Mayor of Palm Beach, FL
U.S. Marines?
Talking about Grand Duches Maria's claims to russian crown, there's one not too well known, but technically quite essential detail. When her grandfather, Grand Duke Kirill, proclaimed himself emperor in exile, he decided to forgot one quiete significant episode from 1917 - the fact that in February 1917 he recognized the Provisional Government and nd the February Revolution BEFORE the abdication of Nicholas and his brother Mikhail. By that according to the laws of Russian Empire Grand Duke Kirill committed high treason and lost all possible rights to the throne.
Agree, Grand Duke Kirill always hide his actions during 1917 and clearly goes against Nicholas. With that, he lose all his rights
Isn't it up to the monarch to decide what counts as treason?
@@dawnfire82 Yes and no: yes, final word belongs to monarch (but only in absolute monarchy), no - some general things (like participating in an uprising against monarch) that will be considered terason by anyone sane are written in laws and determined by them. Basically a word of an absolute monarch is a law, but since making all laws anew with every new monarch is impractical, they write down words of his preceedors and the new monarch also recognises them as laws.
maybe he tried to save what N did not manage - a good intetion
Didn’t his father Kirill pardon him and make him his heir?
UPDATE: I passed my exam lmao and then I went and got a 511 on my MCAT thanks y’all 😂❤️ (also, I’m not a pharmacist. I’m in undergrad)
Me, should be studying for my pharmacology exam: I wonder who would be the current Tsar of Russia? 🧐
You never know, it might come in handy 🤷♀️😉
This is me for law school
How was the exam finally? :)
that's the problem with youtube
@@SzilviNet i get an aproved, so yeah i was scared
I purchased two of your charts (both excellent) ERFT - NE & ERFT - W. It would be informative to have a chart showing who the present day heirs are for the Houses of Hohenzollern (Germany/Prussia, Romania) , House of Hapsburg (Austria Hungary) and for the House of Bourbon (France) .
For Austria & HaBsburg (not sure why Murricans always say Hapsburg) it's Karl. A loser and repeated failure businessman, who finally managed to turn a profit by renting accomodation to the government for the "refugee" wave of 2015 and afterwards.
For Hohenzollern it is Georg Friedrich Prinz von Preussen
I have done my DNA and I do not need to lie about who I am. Always remember King James loves all, not just a select few.
The French and Russian royal families are in dispute as to who the rightful ruler is.
Your chart is actually missing Grand Duchess Olga, Czar Nicholas II youngest sister. She survived and had 2 sons, whether her next of kin wanted and could’ve ruled is another matter, but you should’ve included her and her own lineage too.
I was tried to find her on the chart while I'm listening👍
Yes. And she had two sons. But she married a commoner. And the sons were from this marriage
@@peppersghosttheater well, ya - but don't forget, we decided to get rid of the Pauline rule! So they're cool! And from another vid I watched on Olga, she raised those boys right. I'm voting for one of them! Oops - I guess my vote doesn't count...
@@lee.m.506 I think the Pauline rule was still in place then and it's not retroactive. I hear you though. Where were they when she died. Any information I saw was she died alone ?
@@peppersghosttheater I don’t know. I wish I knew. I’d like to read and find out about her sons and hopefully they had children of their own. To my knowledge, Grand Duchess Olga was under the care of friends of hers when she passed. Perhaps, her kids are in Canada or Denmark?
my mother lost an original picture of the last Tsar family, which was brought by my great grandmother. cried a whole ass river
😢❤️
Omg that’s so sad and unfortunate. That would’ve been so expensive
thats really sad but B I S E X U A L F R O G
@@frederickthegreat4801 LMAOOO IT'S A CAT NOT A FROG BUT YES HAHSHD
@@froyodor LMAOO I THOUGHT IT WAS A FROG SORRY
Very interesting, educational and fun! Thank you so much for sharing it with everybody on the web.
Idk if you already have a video of the House of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha, but I really want one. In some point of the history they were in almost every great marriage of their time.
England, Russia, Brazil, etc
It's quite interesting
A simple search would've confirmed that 🙄
@@vincenttt8289 sorry, I don't have as much time free as you seem to have. This kind of content is just the one I consume for relax, because I find it interesting.
If I had time to make comments that would help no one, I would definitely use it tl find more contet I find interesting instead.
Have a good day.
@vincenttt Uh... it will still be very interesting to see an in-depth visual representation of how such a minor German House grew to be so prolific in Europe, so no, a simple Google search isn't enough
..aren't their claim that had a house in Sachen, only nothing else: no holdings?
What do I inherit if they keep changing my name? Nothing. Maybe I am not the only one. Help me find my money and you will be rewarded greatly. Hmm.
Yay! A new video, I kept wondering why you didn't update yesterday, then I realized wait, it's only Thursday.
Georgian House of Bagrationi looks pretty interesting. I hope there will be a video about it soon.
its not in the chart tho so im not sure
@@ქართველიქართველი-ჩ4ბ This is very interesting to read. I know little about the Georgian history, and given that you are a neighbour, it is not something to be proud of. Is there any serious political movement for a future restoration of the Bagrationi monarchy?
What a groovy connection to the official photographers! Wow! I agree with you. It’s Maria for me as well.
Since the revolution was a shock of great magnitude, comparable to the The Time of Troubles (Smuta) in Russia from 1598 to 1612, I believe that the search for candidates for the throne among the members of the deposed House of Romanov should be stopped. In my opinion, a new Zemsky Sobor should be held - a procedure during which the Romanov dynasty was brought to the throne, and a new ruling dynasty should be elected on it.
There is another option: technically, we can use the precedent that took place after the suppression of the line of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, when power passed to the next oldest branch of the Rurikovich - Shuisky. From this, for example, it follows that technically the next oldest clan, the Odoevskiye, should have become tsars, but it was cut short in 1869. There are quite a lot of princely families descending from Rurik, and if you wish, you can establish which of the currently existing branches is the first in seniority at the moment.
By the way, this is a rather interesting topic, I suggest the author of the channel to make a video about it.
Автор канала, скорее всего, так далеко не копал и не собирается 😅
Useful Charts can you do Who be King of Romania today if Romania decided to restore its monarchy
That's very easy actually, the last king of Romania died in 2017 and the leader of the house is his elder daughter Margaret
It’s explained in the “Who would be king of Canada?” video.
@@johanpeturdam I remember in that video he mentioned that Romania "chose" to abolish their monarchy in 1948, when in reality there was a violent military coup and it became a communist dictatorship.
@@arthurmiguel4983 Doesnt King Micheal have a son
@@arthurmiguel4983 a video will still be nice 🙂
Who would be Tsar of Russia today?
TNO Players: :)
Where is Alexei!!?
Rurik II of course
Vladimir I Putin
Hail our blessed regent
*Cursed clocks start playing*
Xenia would be poetic af given her father was involved in killing Rasputin lol
I can actually tell you a thing about it! In September I was in St. Petersburg, at the Yusupovs' museum-palace, where her grandfather lived, who participated in the murder of Rasputin. EVERY literally EVERY visitor, is told how Xenia, just arriving at the museum, found out that she was involved in this family. I doubt if this is completely true, but the story is interesting.
It wasn’t her Xenia husband that was involved in murdering Rasputin. Xenia‘s daughter’s husband that was involved
@@jenniferspencer1802 Ohh did I make a mistake there? I always thought of it wrong then, I will have to check. Thanks for pointing it out!
@богатырь Росси́я wasn't Rasputin manipulating a woman desperate to save her son?
The original Xenia's daughters husband, and the father of the current Xenia. Irina's husband.
Thanks for the upload! That's a very interesting question!
How utterly fascinating! Thanks for another great video! I enjoyed it very much.
This was so fun to watch and wonder "what if!?" Thank you for putting these together.
He: what if Russia wants to be a monarchy again...
Meanwhile Putin: Yes😏
He is going to abdicate prettty soon
In a way you could call Putin the unofficial Czar currently but he's not of royalty yeah;))
Royalty and kings rest on political strength and an army to back it. Putin has that and doesn't need decadent aristocracy to back him.
@@robertoa.m.3984 True you have a point there you could call him a modern Czar if you will which he is he will rule till his death all that's missing is the crown and that can be arrainged yeah:))
now their's a job for Rachael
Our family have a photo album of our fore-bearers enjoying a summer holiday with the Romanov’s at one of their palaces.
It is so tragic what happened to this family,
Ballz. The tragedy lay in how their people lived under their despotic rule. They reaped what they sowed.
cry bourgoise
maybe the children was a sad case, certainly not the tsar or his bitch wife
@@BaldrickisDead They were not despots, they were careless and naive, made a lot of bad decisions, but the amount of hurt they caused is nothing compared to what Lenin and Stalin caused.
@@99EKjohn what? Are the rulers of the Empire, the largest country on the planet, naive? Do you really think so? Well, if they were really naive, given their status, then it's good that they were overthrown before they finally ruined the country and lost everything that their ancestors and people worked so hard to create.
but in general, I think they were rather stubborn conservatives and did not want to change to a changing world. for which they paid the price
@@BaldrickisDead ballz. And Lenin and stalin???
I actually met and had dinner with The Grand Duchess Maria in 1994 in Madrid! Her son was also there and at the time Boris Yeltsin had recognised her and her son as the rightful heirs as other family members also were claimants. This lady was very regal and her English, Spanish and French were flawless. She told me many stories about European royalty. One story was of the funeral of the King of Norway where she was relegated to a room for defunct royals and therefore was ignored by our own Prince Phillip which amused and annoyed her as they are related. It was a surreal evening but we had quite a few Johnny Walkers and soda and she was great fun but so interesting and she hoped that her son would eventually become Tsar again.
Wow, you'd think Phillip would be more sympathetic since he was also from a defunct royal house
Most royals don’t consider her royal and look at her claim as weak. Prince Philip is the nephew of the last empress
Lucky you 😄
Philip's great aunts were Empress Alexandra and Grand Duchess Elizabeth (Sergei) who were both killed by the Bolsheviks. That probably colored his feelings about those who survived the massacres.
Although Maria's paternal grandmother was Victoria Melita of Edinburgh and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and thus a British princess, the Kyril branch was never close to the BRF. Kyril's niece was Marina, Duchess of Kent who married a British prince in 1936. (Queen Mary bought the Vladimir tiara from the children of her grandmother Grand Duchess Vladimir who died 1920).
I think the Bagrations (Georgian ruling house) and the Dadianis (Mingrelia) were not regarded as equal by the mostly German ruling houses reigning 1800-1918. Again, that might have influenced how Maria was viewed by the BRF. Unfair but the Romanovs (1800-1946) never treated these former ruling houses as equals even though Tatiana, a great-granddaughter of Nicholas I, was allowed to marry a Bagration prince just before the First World War. But no Rusdian grand duke or prince was alliwed to marry a Georgian or Rurikid or Gedyminid (Lithuanian origin) princess. Or a Tatar origin princess either.
I don't think I have ever seen photos of British royals interacting in public with the Romanov descendants. Nicholas II's sister Xenia and her children and grandchildren were largely ignored as well. Xenia was George V's first cousin too. I remember reading about Xenia's grandson Andrew (the 97 year old) being told off by phone for playing in the Frogmore gardens while the York princesses were there. I suspect they were treated as poor relations which they now were.
To summarize, the BRF distanced itself from the Romanovs since 1917. I doubt that Maria Vladimorovna has been invited to BRF events. But the former reigning dynasties of Romanians, Bulgarians, Yugoslavs/Serbs, and Greeks were all represented at Philip's memorial service on 29th March. Margarita of Romania (granddaughter of Helen of Greece, a first cousin of Philip), Alexander of Yugoslavia (son of a first cousin Alexandra of Greece), Kyril of Bulgaria (son of a distant cousin Simeon II), Anne-Marie of the Hellenes (her husband Constantine II, son of a first cousin Paul/Pavlos I of the Hellenes) with two sons and their wives. But the BRF doesn't invite the Prussian royals or Habsburgs either.
@@shinjineesen400 Well Dadianis were dukes- nobles, not royals. Bagrations were a royal dynasty though.
Wow I am impressed by your wifes relationship to the official Czar's Photographer. I learned that my grandfather was the official bagpiper to the Laird of Butte, his brother Angus was the official bagpiper to Andrew Carnegie, and their father was the official bagpiper to the Clan Chief Cluny MacPherson! All these men are direct decendants of the macPherson piper who led the Clan into the Culloden battle. 1745. Family trees make history come alive.
What's up with your family and bagpipes?
76ù
I don´t know who those Buttes, Carnegies and MacPhersons are lol
If I had to drop either morganatic rule or male-line rule, I would probably drop morganatic rule which seems to be a very late introduction to succession concepts. I doubt the original rulers of Russia, the Rurikids would care much about the nobility of the mother. Some of them were even born to concubines. But they were concerned about the male-line. Also, you can't maintain the morganatic rule forever in modern day situations but you can track male line descent easier. My personal pick would be Rostislav btw since I think being aligned with the country and having male-line descent fits more to the original concept of kingship.
the problem is that the Romanovs aren't male line descendents, and the existence of Empress Elizabeth and Empress Catherine. It makes no sense to restrict them to the male line like in France.
@@Benkenobi8118 Well they are the male line descendants of Paul and Nicholas I at least. Maria's son is a Hohenzollern so the male line decendants of a Tzar is preferable I guess.
@@arad4852 Maria's son is a Romanov, the marriage between Maria and Franz Wilhelm of Prussia was a matrilineal one. He had to leave his protestant faith, his prussian titles, etc, to become an orthodox Grand Duke of Russia. There are papers that says that the children born from the marriage would be part of the Romanov dynasty, all of this with the approval of the Patriarch. After their divorse, Franz Wilhelm took back his name and prussian titles, when he was married to her his name was "Grand Duke Mikhail Pavlovich".
@@nicks5636 All of that doesn't change the fact thay Y haplogroup of Paul the First, who created the male-line rule will be gone.
@@arad4852 Paul the First made a semi-salic succession system, if there aren't any male left or allowed to inherit the throne, then a female can become Empress.
Vraisment, Merci d'avoir expliqué ces lignées aux personnes qui se soucient encore de l'histoire. Il est assez important de connaître les têtes couronnées d'Europe et d'ailleurs.
This is the only channel I can play at 2x speed and still understand every word.
Yup, can't watch a video video of his without noticing how wonderful it is!
The dude has a perfect educator diction!
He mentioned in some of the previous videos, if I recall correctly, that he had the educator career somewhere outside the Anglosphere, Sri Lanka I think, so I guess this is where he mastered this impeccable diction, so he may be clearly understood not depending on the recipients' language level.
It's just my theory why his manner of speech is so clear, I might be wrong.
Nevertheless, much appreciated, it kinda optimizes the "brain RAM" used for understanding, and allows a listener to listen and think simultaneously.
I'm afraid I totally disagree with you on your choice of Princess Maria Vladimirovna as next Empress of Russia. As has been pointed out earlier, her grandparents, Kirill and Victoria were first cousins, which is against Orthodox law. In addition Victoria was a divorcee which didn't go well at the time. We must also remember Kirill's disloyalty to Nicholas II at the time of the revolution, and his mother's backstabbing and plotting against both Nicholas and Alexandra in the years leading up to the revolution. The Vladimirs always wanted the throne. At the time of the Borki train disaster in 1888 when Alexander III and his family were almost killed, Alexander III is reputed to have said "Won't Vladimir be disappointed"
Maria's son, Prince George, who is in fact a Prince of Prussia, was married just over a week ago to an Italian lass named Rebecca Bettarini, the daughter of a diplomat. Her family is not of royal or even noble descent, although Maria Vladimirovna has seen fit to ennoble them which she has no right to do. They look a nice couple and I wish them well, but really, its all so pretentious! Other Romanov descendants don't carry on this way,
Its a decision to be made by the Russian people, who at this stage at least, seem reluctant for the monarchy to return.
Seeing as she is not a current ruler you are correct she had no right to ennoble them
The days of King's and Queens are over.
I think that there was a stipulation that women could not inherit the throne. If a woman is allowed to claim the crown, then retroactively the daughters of the czars would have caused the line of succession to vary.
Who cares about orthodox law. An emperor is above god
I keep reading the comments and missing the video
Kirill marched with the revolutionaries in 1917, wearing a red band on his arm when Nicholas was overthrown, he was a coup, he hoped to be appointed by the provisional government as the new Czar.
Nicholas's mother disapproved of Kirill, and claimed that he was expelled from the line of succession along with his descendants for high treason to Emperor Nicholas II.
Maria has already given many statements where she despises Nicholas II and her children, when she hears the exhumation of the bodies recently, they called her to attend a ceremony, she did not want to go, saying that the last reigning Emperor was not of her family.
She doesn't even care about the legacy of the last Emperor, just like her grandfather Kirill and great-grandfather Vladimir, she has her eye only on the crown.
Vladimir always envied Alexander III and his descendants, Vladimir and Kirill considered themselves more worthy than Nicholas.
There are several texts relating to this ambition of the Vladimir lineage
could you share the information
Thanks for a fascinating video. I fully agree with you on who is the best candidate - your argument of why was what I was thinking myself while listening to your video.
You seem to be confusing nobles (Maria's mother was Princess Bagration) and royals. A non-morganatic marriage in this case would mean it was between two royals, not nobles. Nobles were considered commoners by royalty. Both Princess Diana and Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, were commoners even though both were daughters of earls. Emperor Alexander II's 2nd marriage was morganatic even though his wife was a princess: she was from a noble family, not royal family.
I never understood why if Paul I changed the rules of succession, a later Emperor couldn't change it back.
Grand Duke Kirill's wife was not German. She was the ex-wife of Ernest of Hesse and by Rhine, but was the daughter of Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh (2nd son of Queen Victoria) and Grand Duchess Marie Alexandrovna of Russia (daughter of Alexander II and sister of Kirill's father).
You and Lindsey Holiday are my Royal core comfort youtuber
*Make a video of the Kingdom of Georgia and the Bagrationi dynasty until today*
that would be interesting. Seems the Bagrationi house split in three centuries ago, but recently a man from one line married a woman from another, thus effectively reuniting the two most senior lines. The head of the Orthodox Church in Georgia is even calling for their son to be crowned King.
@@keithharper32 it would be extraordinarily interesting to see Georgia restore its monarchy
Was a time the georgia was bighest than germany. When georgia was ruled by. king david 4 builder
It should be the oldest ruling dyasty/line in Europe, the Bagrationis have connections to some ancient Persian dynasties according to CK atleast
That would be interesting.
I love how people will argue about which one of them has a title that no longer exists.
Happy New Year Matt and family, can't think of a better way to start the year than watching your vids
I've been obsessed with the Romanovs since I was 9. This is amazing. And to hear a Romanov lives in the same state as me made my heart skip a beat.
Terrible to think they let themselves be killed because self-defense was below them
@@elasticharmony They deserved it for being complacent to the suffering of the people.
I am semi-obsessed to,I still am not convinced Ann Anderson was not Anastasia. even with the so-called DNA test,
@@MxCheefah The children deserved to be murdered in cold blood?
@@elasticharmony How are u going to defend yourself with guns and boyanetts?
Me who has not listened to Anastasia (Broadway) in a very very long time : "ah yes, the princess Anastasia Romanov who lived and ran away in Paris with derek klena"
😂☠️😂
Hello, You explain well matters which usually can get confusing. Here is still a suggestion to make your presentations even better: When somebody looks at your genealogical charts on a regular size smartphone the individual images of persons and their names are in fact close to indistinguishable. This is a pitty. You can please explore how to zoom into the larger picture to make the portrait photo of the person you just talk about much larger and many viewers very happy. I am sure there is a way to do the zoom effect with a bit of additional effort. One way can be that you simply include a cut out image of the genealogical tree each time you talk about a particular person long enough.
I will now have a look at your other videos.
P.S. in this video you could have mentioned just for general information, that with Peter the Great having children with a former communer and house maid the rule of morganatic or not was at the discretion of the Tsar. Therefore all claimants to the throne who followed are supposed to be the descendants of a woman who started as a maid and not much is known about her ancestry. Maybe you can also explore a bit the situation created by the designation of Michael by his older brother in 1917 in the abdication text. The ensuing decision of Michael to "let the people vote for a Tsar" is indeed still a valid legal act. 100% up to now. Because the Provisional Government of Russia was based on the free decision of Michael to sign that document in 1917 to let the People of Russia decide. Kerenski maybe tried to outsmart everybody, but this doesn't change the fact that Michael's decision was rightful and legal. (Not to forget that even Nikolas II and his family lived under the regime of the Provisional Government). Michael got his power from the Tsar who is supposed to have this position through God, and Michael who was more down to Earth in the approach gave his People a time to make choices about the future. The criminal Gang of Lenin overthrow the ailing legitimate Provisional Government and everything that followed is only founded on this illegal toppling in 1917 of the last 100 % legitimate Regime (Kerenski & Co) . Including the USSR and Russian Federation today which are fruits and descendants of the Lenin coup and not of the last Tsar's rightful decisions. To restaure full "rights" according to the former Monarchy, the Plebiscite wanted by Michael, sabotaged by the Bolchevics should take place. And in such a free voting for monarchy or not or whatever, the question who is going to be the next Tsar or Tsarina is also a choice to be made by the People.
Last time I was this early, the Russia still had a tsar
13 likes in 12 minutes
18 like in 18 minutes.
24 likes in 23 minutes
28 likes in 28 minutes
49 likes in 58 minutes
Last time I was this early the Nicholas the II and his family were still alive
May they Rest In Peace.
@@sonicvenom8292 They are saints, and have all the peace there is in heaven.
@@lauragolub Saints whose misfortune it was to have really bad timing. Heartbreakingly bad timing. Nicholas II and his wife and children were paying for so much for which they were not responsible. A true tragedy.
May the Romanov family rest in God's grace.
rip bozos
Remember the child from Lady Die ? The horsetrainer ? The federadion has the Double bird on the Flag Not Just for the fun of it.
Good riddance.
@@exaid0556you prefer Bolsheviks
I have enjoyed watching this, and your narration
But what if instead of restoring Romanovs on the throne, Russia (for some inexplicable reason) decided to restore Rurik's descendants (or Rurikids) to the throne of Russia? That would be an interesting video to watch.
Вообще, автор не учёл такую особенность российского престолонаседия как призыв на царствование. Земский Собор имеет полное право (и в русской историографии подобные случаи описаны не раз) по итогам голосования призвать кандидата на престол. Так было с Михаилом Романовым, несмотря на то, что имелось множество других предтендентов из дома Рюриковичей. И так может в любой момент случится с любым другим государственным мужем. Даже с Путиным.
@@tyvgot1367 да, но Путин не имеет никакой связи ни с Рюриковичами, ни с Романовыми. Того же Михаила назначили потому что его двоюродная бабка была женой Ивана Грозного. Так что косвенная связь есть. У Путина её нет.
@@grach_03 почитайте про избрание Михаила. Там кандидатов была уйма и самым главным конкурентом был английский король, которого хотели избрать просто потому, что он одной веры с ними. Англиканство долгое время считалось формой православия.
@@tyvgot1367 эм, англиканство - форма православия? Признаюсь, слышу впервые. Кандидатура Якова I только выдвигалась и то, была многими не поддержана, потому что все помнили Семибоярщину и иностранцев в Москве. К тому же, была она выдвигнута кем то из новгородцев, которые в случае чего получили бы большие преверенции от англичан. Тем более из иностранцев также выдвигалась кандидатуры польского и шведского принцев. Но их не поддержали из-за их интервенции в Смуту. Михаил был идеальной кандидатурой , потому что какие никакие связи с прошлой династией имел, его отец был сторонником Лжедмитрия, да и сам Михаил ничего плохого как и хорошего во время Смуты не делал. Идеальная нейтральная кандидатура. Тем более ему тогда было всего 16 лет. Его отец был в тюрьме в Польше и принял постиг. Так что Михаил был идеальной кандидатурой для бояр.
@@grach_03 тем не менее, Михаил был избран не потому, что имел какие-то связи с рюриковичами, отнюдь. Да, связь с рюриками позволила ему в принципе быть кандидатом, но если бы это было главным критерием, то выбрали бы каких-нибудь князей Боголюбских или Орловых, или Долгоруковых, которые были прямыми потомками Рюрика. Якову быть потенциальным царём не мешало отсутствие связей с Иваном Грозным. Здесь сыграли факторы именно политической конъюнктуры: Михаил был самым выгодным. И если выгодным окажется кто-нибудь из нынешних политиков, будьте уверены, что его изберут несмотря ни на что.
You forgot to mention Nicholas's sister Olga - her son's probably don't qualify since she married a commoner but she should have at least been mentioned if you bring up Xenia
She was divorced and her sons were from her second husband.
@@ralphl7643 Not divorced. That first marriage was annulled. The first husband was a homosexual and the marriage was never consummated.
Remain calm.
The Regent endures.
Alexei lives.
The Holy Russian Empire shall endure.
There is much to be done.
Hail the nightmare!
God save russia for no one else can
each clock needs to be verified, we need to work harder.
Verify your clock
Bah, there is only one true Tsar of Russia, the Tetris Tsar Vladimir the third
I thought it would take me longer to find such a comment
I’ve seen Mrs Maria attending a wedding last year, her son I think in Russia, on RUclips. Very powerful images to see the line continues.
I heard years ago that the Romanov fortune was secured in the Chase Manhattan Bank, which was apparently the habit of many royal families, namely to have the family fortune somewhere other than at "home" as it were. If this tidbit of history is true, I rather think the governors of Chase Manhattan would seriously contend anyone who came forth to claim the Romanov throne, as the Bank then would have to produce said fortune. If one believes in "follow the money" than one could well ask what role the Rockefeller family had in the Revolution of 1917.. history if allowed to be told accurately, is truly a curious thing....who knows? The supposed heir could end up being a majority stock holder in Chase if the fortune was never removed.....
👏 а ещё банки Японии, там очень много золота Российской Империи)))
Don't believe that rumor. It's not true. There is no Romanov money in any bank. During World War I Tsar Nicholas withdrew all of his money from banks all over the world and used it to build and staff military hospitals in Russia. When he died he was worth almost nothing. What little was left was seized by the Bolsheviks.
Who would be Tsar of Russia today?
Putin has just entered the conversation!
Looks like Putin, already been in power longer than a czar
@@lindadechiazza2924 lmao
Lol yeah probably
Putin half dictator half czar
@@richardque4952 i agree with this
My family are actually the descendants of Adolphe Thiers, the guy who ruled during the third republic! Was kinda neat to see his face during the video!
Wow! How did you find that out?
Great video and I love your personal connection :-)
I just love triple Rostislav
Also it was funny to hear you struggle with Bagrationi surname
@@Soripheal yeeaaaaah
What
Or better whatever
I really find family trees interesting, especially royal family tree 😍 Might I suggest a video about the "Spencer" family tree, the late Princess Diana's family.
the name Kirill is not pronounced "Kay-reel", but rather "ki" as in "key" and "rill" as in "thrill"
Its Russian for Cyril.
In English it is Cyril
he's not russian, shame, let him be😂
that's right.
If you make a doco commentary, at least get the pronunciation right..it's not a difficult name
My maternal grandfather was a Fredericks/Freedericksz/Фредерикс (spelled several ways depending on how whichever branch of the family wanted to spell it and which country they lived in) who was the last Minister of the Imperial Court of Russia. Count Fredericks/Freedericksz/Фредерикс was his cousin. Buried in Finland. SUOMI
wut
During the February Revolution of 1917, Kirill marched to the Tauride Palace at the head of the Garde Equipage (Marine Guard) to swear allegiance to the Russian Provisional Government, wearing a red band on his uniform. Kirill had authorised the flying of a red flag over his palace on Glinka Street in Petrograd and in correspondence with a Romanov relative claimed credit for "saving the situation by my recognition of the Provisional Government". It is probable that he had hoped that by ingratiating himself with the Provisional Government he would be declared regent after Nicholas II was made to abdicate.
It was the Provisional Government that overthrew the Tzar, and my supporting that Government Kirill supported the action against the Tzar.
This is treason against the Tzar, and that makes him and his descendents trown out. And Maria is NOT a Grand Duchess. The last Grand Duchess of Russia was Grand Duchess Olga.
Maria not Olga….
But didn't Tzar Nicolas forgive him, therefore pardoning him? And you could argue that the church didn't forgive him, but Maria has the churches support. So that claim has no holding
Did he do that of his own accord? Or was he forced to do so?
"It all started with the Russian February Revolution of 1917, which resulted in the Provisional Government coming to power in Russia. Emperor Nicholas I abdicated and so did his brother Mikhail, and the full power of the emperor passed to the Provisional Government. On April 12 (according to the new calendar) 1917, the Provisional Government adopted the regulation "On the Provisional Order of the Administrative Government and Local Government of the Estonian Governorate", on the basis of which both the Estonian Governorate and the Estonian Region of the Livonian Governorate were merged into one Estonian Governorate." - Uno Trumm, historian
A lot of things happened after that, but long story short - We can say that the Republic of Estonia is connected to the Russian Empire by the umbilical cord and is juridically its sole legal heir.
@@themightyeagle21no, Nicholas was outraged by Kirill's act and Nicholas was heard by quite a few people saying that Kirill had committed "treason". That automatically rules out Kirill and all his heirs.
That would be Vladimir, of House Putin.
Doubt it. Pretty sure he is going to quit before 2025
@@therac197 no, I don't think he will
Fuck DA Putin, we Russians are proud people with more than 1000 years of history. Enough of usurpers, we need freedom and prosperity like other European contries! Too bad that Putin destroyed all the democratic institues, made them his puppets :(
@@igroteka90 а то что без Путина запад сделал Россию своей марионеткой, тебя походу не волнует, "патриотичный" либераст
@@alenka15alma ух, зачем же оскорбительные слова использовать
An excellent video as allways.
Today I have a petition tho.
Could you pleaaaaase make a video about the Mexican Imperial families? Both the Iturbide and Habsburg.
I've tried for a bit to do it by myself but you're a professional so. I would love to watch a video about that.
Thanks. Great content
He mentions them briefly in the Aztec one or the Mayan one but it would be cool to see who they were related to before they were appointed.
*ALWAYS
Wow that's really interesting - thanks for the video!
Romanovs...they live! Almost like history is repeating itself.
GREAT VIDEOS! INCREDIBLE! THANK YOU!
Although I was a World History teacher for many years, I'm still confused about the rightful line of succession. I'm just saddened about those events of 1917.
The issue with a morganatic marriage is that everyone agrees any children will inherit their mother's status, not their father's. Likewise, the wife doesn't have the same status as her husband. Nothing else changes, the children are legitimate, they just don't inherit titles and rank from their father. This is why a morganatic marriage, a legal and not a social description, breaks the line of succession, when semi-agnatic does not. Love your channel. I can indulge almost all my obsessions here.
Which is also why Harry and Meghan’s marriage is not morganatic, as Meghan became a Duchess upon their marriage and their children were granted the title of Prince(ss) when Charles ascended the throne.
Je suis passionnée d’Histoire Russe. Ma Famille ayant eu des relations avec les Grands Exilés Russes en France et Celle-ci, ayant toujours aimé et soutenu les Exilés. Aussi cette Culture avec la mienne m’a toujours été proche et sensible.
❤️🇷🇺❤️
I recall a few years ago reading an obituay for a house painter in Melbourne, who was descended from the Romonovs. He was described as well respected and humble. I'll see if I can find it
There is a book in which Prince Michael of Kent becomes Tsar of Russia. He is related to them, knows a lot about Russia and speaks Russian. He also looks a lot like Nicholas II
He does look strikingly similar. Also to Nicholas cousin, King George. Nicholas and George were cousins but could’ve passed for twins.
and is married to a complete dead shit
@@ausbrum Can't you make your point without resorting to childish name calling? I'm unfamiliar with the woman, so just inform me what is so bad about her and leave off the slurs from the school yard. I guess if the former president can behave that way, he becomes the role model for all the unwarranted social incivility and outrage.
I read that he had to give up any claims when he married his wife. I don’t know if it is true or not.
He looks like his grandfather King George who could have been twins with his cousin Nicholas
By the Russian crowning laws YOU HAVE TO BE crowned by the Patriarch (or rather in Russian times Metropolitan) of Moscow, thus only the one who has the support of the Church and patriarch can be Imperator and Tsar. All others who don't have the support of the Church, that meaning the patriarchy, are illegitimate. That is the rule that has often been forgotten when discussed this topic, since it was never actually officially writen down in state succession rules, although it is in Church ones and in crowning rules (although I might be wrong about the crowning rules, since those changed a lot overtime). That's why Useful Charts is right that only Maria can be the rightful Imperator.
As for the Emperor/Tsar dispute over name of the title, it's actually very interesting. You see, Russian "Emperors" were both Tsars and Imperators! What does that mean? Well, let me explain. Since Russian rulers considered themselves to be the legitimate successors of the Byzantine/Roman emperors there arose one problem-about the title. You see, in the middle ages, up until the Charlemagne, it is considered that there can be only one true Emperor title ruler-the Roman one. It wasn't just the highest ruling title as we see it today, it meant that that person, the Basileus in Constantinople, is the literal God's representative on the Earth, thus ruling not only above the subjects of his Empire, but OVER ALL THE HUMANS, or at least all the Christians! Giving that he is proclaimed to be literally "equal to the apostles" he had one another important duty - taking care of the fate. You see in Byzantium/Eastern Rome it wasn't patriarch that was heading the Church, it was Emperors. They had the power to basically do whatever they wanted with the Church: they were appointing patriarchs, they were writing church laws, HECK they were so powerful that they could even decide how the Jesus looked like! In fact the reason that Jesus is today depicted with a beard is because since the beginning of the 7th century Byzantine Emperors started wearing beards themselves, as before that neither the Byzantine emperors had it nor was the Jesus represented on the icons with beard!
The same thing was in the West, but there it caused the fight for the investiture between Popes and the HRE (Holly Roman Empire) emperors over the position who is actually the head of the entire Christian world. At the end in the 13th century, the Popes won and thus the Emperors were "theoretically" subservient to them (the best proof that it wasn't practically always the case was Charles V 1527 sacking of Rome).
But, back to the Russian Emperors. As I said, they were both Imperators and Tsars. Tsar was basically the rank of Emperor. But what was then Imperator? Well it was a rank ABOVE the rank of Emperor! You see the Byzantines at the end had to agree to the sad reality that there cannot be only one Christian Emperor. Thus they acknowledged the existence of HRE emperors in 812, Bulgarian Emperors in 917 and Serbian Emperors in 1350. But there was a trick! They acknowledged them not as the Roman, which at that time meant universal, but as their NATIONAL (consider the term national vaguely, since nationalism wasn't yet a thing) emperors. So Charlemagne was only the Emperor of the Franks, Simeon only the Emperor of Bulgarians and Dušan the mighty as the Emperor of the Serbs, while only the Emperor in Constantinople was the ruler above them all and ruler of all Christians. Now, since Russian ruler took completely, to the last detail, the Byzantine imperial ideology, they too considered themselves as something above just the Emperors of the Russians (and also gained the "right" to decide the church laws and other religious stuff). That particularly came into the effect during the rule of Peter the Great when Russians started slowly mingling to the world stage as one of the most powerful countries in the world. He, as a boss that he was, added to his already existing title of Tsar the title of Imperator in 1721. Thus Tsar was a national title of the Russians, while Imperator, the title above the Emperor one, was considered as the on representing the ruler over all the Christians or at this phase over all Orthodox Christians! That was particularly important since Russians were for centuries aiming at liberation of the Orthodox Christians occupied by the Ottomans and other Empires. At the end they succeeded in liberating those Christians, but it did kinda cost them the whole Empire, soooo......yeah, it was only partially worth it.
Underrated comment. It's a pity many wouldn't read it just because of the lenght. Thank you for the knowledge
Im waaaaay too lazy to read this. Sorry bud.
🤔интересно
well after Peter the Great all the Romanovs actually crowned THEMSELVES since there was no more Patriarchs to crown them. meaningful though, that they crushed, and never restored, patriarchs, and were crushed themselves in their due time,
@@decorde-taccard I know that Patriarchs crowned the emperors. It s only that after Peter the Great Russia did not have a Patriarch, as Church was part of state bureaucratic system, so Nicholas could not be crowned, and just crowned himself, and his spouse.
I don't know if he's still alive but there was someone here in Canada, in Richmond Hill Ontario, who claimed he was a direct descendant to the last Tsar. I can't remember his name. I saw him interviewed on a local news broadcast. He didn't speak a word of Russian. Also, the Grand Duchess Olga, the last person to be born from a ruling monarch, Alexander II, died here in Toronto Ontario in 1960. Her older brother, of course, went on to become Nicholas II.
Alexander lll
Anyone else think he’s talking absurdly slowly in the first 15 seconds?
All 15 minutes! I'm a huge fan of Useful Charts, and I watch them all on 1.5 speed - sounds much more natural.
I like it, it's very relaxing!
Royal genealogy is a bit complicated for some of us, so his talking pace give us time to understand titles, who’s he talking about, remember some historical facts, etc.
@@taketomo6520 Oh absolutely! I certainly wasn't complaining. It's great we can adjust the speed to suit our own listening style. Useful for videos in a language we are less confident in, detailed content etc. Very helpful.
When explaining things like this that can get confusing slow is better then just adjust to taste. 90% of RUclipsrs I watch on 1.25 speed.
They kind of sort of have a CZAR today: Vladimir I of the House of Putin
Lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Exactly
Lol very good!
As a russian i can confirm
Putin, that's the answer.
Vladimir Vladimirovich would be Vladimir IV if he accepted the throne, as there were 3 Rurikid Grand Princes named Vladimir/Volodymir before the Tsardom of Muscovy.
Putin and Maria Vladimirovna should marry so they both can rule
You're goddamn right! =)
@@Account-jn7xu And the tsars weren't? I mean, in paper Nicky 2nd had a Duma after the russo-japanese war, but of course it didn't really restrict his power. They were also cruel dictators, maybe they would still be on the throne if they had modernized.
@@Account-jn7xu a fascist dictator that open the gate for immigrants?
Спасибо за объяснение этих родословных людям, которые все еще заботятся об истории. Довольно важно знать о коронованных особах Европы и не только.
важно почему?
@@MopaHa13булкой похрустеть.
Ответ на вопрос видео - кто бы мог претендовать на Русский трон - н͇и͇к͇т͇о͇. "Les aristocrates a la lanterne! Les aristocrates on les pendra!"
Thank you for bringing up the DNA evidence that all of Nicholas' kids were dead. I still keep seeing people referring to someone as one of his kids, living today / dying recently.
It's a reference to something.
but he is alive, we all just need to work harder so that he will return to us. We need to add more hours into the day and verify the clocks.
Its a reference to the Hoi4 mod "The New Order" where a guy called Taboritsy can take over russia and believes that Alexei will return when he has Purified Russia, so he pulls a Gamer move and kills everyone.
The so-called DNA evidence that all of the children died in 1918 is based on approx 40 "shards of bone" half of which could not even be identified as being human. As one of the shards showed evidence of being from a female the others were simply assumed to be male thus accounting for the two missing skeletons from the mass grave. It was recorded that the death squad butchers actually chopped the bodies to bits and attempted to dissolve them with acid before they dumped the remains down the mineshaft, the shards of bone no doubt came from the location where they did their US Federal Reserve funded vile deed.
@@karenjane7762 never knew US Federal Reserve was doing its vile dids in a pitmine 10 kms north-west of Ekaterinburg, Russia. I guess, literally opposite side of the planet is a good place to hide.
The author of this video forgot that Nicholas II sisters survived the revolution and both had sons . They would be to me more eligible than any one else .
Sisters? Only 1: Maria and also Alexei
@@PtolemyXVII What? Nicholas II's sisters Olga and Xenia survived and had children.
blue angel yes, but his children Alexei and Maria also survived and had children.
@@PtolemyXVII Wait, you're saying his children survived the revolution and had kids? Their bodies have been found tho thats a conspiracy theory, just like the Anastasia one. They all were murdered
Grab duchess Olga and Xenia, tge sisters of Nicholas II. They have children. Olga died poor in Canada in 1960. She had 2 sons. Plus sister Xenia.
I think the 3 strongest claims to the throne are Andrew (and his kids), Maria, and Dmitri. Personally if I had to choose I would pick Andrew as I feel like he would be most likley picked by the Romanovs pre 1918. Vladimir may have been the last undisputed head of house, but Andrew fallows all of the rules, so his children would be closest related to the legitimate heir.
You forget no Americans. And must be Orthodox
Karl is the chosen because he does follows the male rule.. Then María because she follows the Orthodox rule and Rotislav who is man and Orthodox but not recognized by the church
Dmitri is not Orthodox. Andrew line dies. Xenia is not a male but is Orthodox.
Love your videos!
I'm a Canadian who lives in Ontario. In the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto I saw a large crystal object on display that belonged to the Russian Royal Family and was smuggled out of the country during the Revolution. I can't remember what the object was as I saw it a decade ago, but I want to say that it was a vase.
You forgot Nicholas II sister Olga who had 2 sons. Also, Michael abdicated in favor of the Russian people. Kirill had given up his titles and sided with the red army, going so far as to fly the red flag outside his palace. Alexandra saw it from Tsarskoe Selo and was furious. So how can someone who gave up their titles to still have their family line inherit?
They were forced to give up their titles for they value more of their lives
Murderers cud have killed their entire race,giving up their titles had saved them
Muy cierto!
I'm from Russia, and this is extremely informative
Andrew Romanoff did marry the daughter of a nobleman. His first wife was Elena Konstantinovna Durnova, daughter of Konstantin Afanasievich Durnova. The family of Durnova is a noble family name from Russia so a claim could be made that she is nobility as well even if it goes back a few generations. Since Andrew Romanoff died in 2021. His position as head of the Romanoff family could go to his only son with Elena, Alexis Andreevich Romanov.
Additionally Kirill and all his descendants are barred from the throne due to betraying Nicholas and the throne to revolutionaries.