now wait just a damn minute... are you telling me a camera designed to do exactly what you need/want it for, is better than trying to adapt something else to do what you need/want?! WTF??!!
Saad Azzahrani Because in most cases, especially if you want a cinematic look, a camcorder isn’t going to give you the results you want and a cinema camera will be way out of budget. Pick the right tool for what you’re trying to accomplish. None of it is right or wrong if you get the results that you want.
@@saadazzahrani if only Sony made a VG900 successor. It was the shit back in the day. E mount, full frame sensor handycam. But I'm afraid it's past the point of no return, and the stills camera form factor has taken over.
5 лет назад+8
Thanks for the video. I use the "sister" of this camera, the Canon XF400, for demonstrations, quick interviews or press conferences, a super-solid camera that makes the classic (and heavy) TV cameras obsolete. Highly recommended for this type of work.
Thanks for this. Been debating between the XA50 & the XF400. I plan on using for making E-board videos of myself (using a tripod of course) and either of those two camcorders sounds great for what will be run & gun sports videos.
@@stargazer7644 Not necessarily. I have a very expensive Mirrorless SLR which has good video quality, but the autofocus sucks. Both camcorders and DSLRs have pros and cons.
Glad to see an appreciation for new “traditional” camcorders. Now retired from a career in video production, I sometimes smh at all of the pieces of equipment people have to pack onto their DSLR cameras making them heavy and awkward!! Obviously DSLRs with large sensors and interchangeable lenses have the advantage when shooting stills with great depth of field, but current semi-pro camcorders excel at the convenience of shooting lengthy video indoors and out (built-in neutral density filters!) and recording pro audio, be it via line level from a mixing board, XLR microphones or wireless mics. Thnx much for this review!!
@Land and Lore Photograph Off Road Adventures I get what your saying about carrying lens but I had the canon xa11camcorder and whilst amazing for filming, doesn't have flexibility in shooting raw on DsLr.
Ugh i know right. I start off as a kid frankensteining my dslr with audio recorder and random accessories. God it was scary. A wedding video company i work for even have one of those stupid saramonic audio splitter failed on me. I hate those things in high risk jobs. Im in my 30s now by the time i upgrade to my sony x70 camcorders. I know when something is wrong with the camcorders and can change input manually in the body. I dont have things dropping off from the hotshoe mount of dslr and i can plug in to audio mixer and to wall power easily. Coming from a kid that once frankenstein his way in the job It just feels so much more nicer easing of mind to know your tools dont have multiple weak links that will fail you. Frankensteining should be used only in emergencies. Not the norm.
Same background, just not retired (yet), your post is so spot on. For the vast majority of any type of work, a quality camcorder like the XA50 will do nearly all anyone needs, efficiently and effectively with the least hassles. I’m also astounded at all the filmmaker wannabes who believe shallow DOF is everything. As if composition, lighting, telling the story with the camera, or content in story, acting, etc. weren’t as important. Study film history friends, there are a LOT of Oscar winning films with plenty of DOF in most shots, and not just the B+W classics like Citizen Kane.
So glad to see you flying the flag for actually video cameras. We’ve been trying to bang that drum for a while!! When people complain about canon not offering enough for video I genuinely think they don’t realise they have a whole video & cinema range. The xa50 is a solid voice too!! Great video dude 🙌🙌
okay, this was not the video i meant to send the question to, sorry. I think you spelled it out pretty well, thanks for reading my question, your video was actuallly the only one that explained the handle, so...... thank you, Mike
I always loved using the Canon XF300 camcorder for weddings which I would rent and my second videographer actually owned. He was full time in video and I was both photo and video. Nice to see an all in one camcorder XA50 with great zoom 4K inch sensor, great battery life, good sound. I am considering this again.
Thanks for posting. Camcorders are the best for most run & gun situations. There is a lot of marketing hype about dslr, hybrids & phones. To get decent footage from the iPhone you need an app, external lens, grip, mic etc 😀
For RUclips videos the quality looks stellar. Lots of DR and detail in the image. The image looks quite a bit better than the front camera you are currently using. The front camera has a more cinematic and flat feel to it but I don't think that's beneficial for RUclips work such as this. XA50 looks to fit the bill much better with it's realistic and highly detailed image.
Hope you see this. Between the Canon and the Sony NX80? On the fence. I like the wider lens on the Canon but the physical buttons and slow motion on the Sony.
Thanks I was looking for a video like this for a long time. I use a Panasonic W850 camcorder for ages and wasn’t sure if I should go for a dslr or pro camcorder. I think I’ll stick with a camcorder because of all the features I don’t have to be an expert in.
photodiox has a cool in line variable ND fliter, not a switch, but fluidly moves into different exposures, great for video, far better than swapping between filters in camera because you donnt have to stop recording/have a filter change mid recording
I’ve been looking at the XA50 & the XF400. I’m leaning towards the XF400 because of the screen, mainly. What are your thoughts about the LCD screen on the XA50?
@@BrokenToeKnee the LCD is not as good as a DSLR but that is not a problem for me.. is the final image that matter which is as you see in the video above is crystal clear even at a low light
You are happy with low light results? skin tones are good? Your thoughts on the stabilization? I am used to using a gimbal. I am deciding between this and Sony AX700
@@leotroy9877 Oh yess, I am really satisfied on everything, I mostly use it for the wedding documentaries, recording up to 8 hours per wedding, The stabilizer works perfect but most of the time I Use it on Monopod or tripod, the dynamic range it was a surprise, really good and the auto focus, face tracking etc, touch screen just perfect, it has 3 different color settings, neutral, standard and dynamic range
For a few dollars more, you can get 4k60 and HD120 in addition to everything you like about the xa50, I've been using the XF400 for a couple years now and it's well worth the money
@@ezra8776 It's OK in low light. Wide open is f2.8 with no zoom, f4 with full zoom. It's not the best, though. But you'll be paying much more for a camcorder that is good in low light. Since I do mainly daytime work and corp. video, I either have enough ambient light or can control lighting.
Ronnie Wallin Looks like you’re the guy I need to talk to. I’ve been trying to decide between the XA50 & the XF400. I’m leaning towards the XF400 mainly because of the LCD screen. I really don’t care about 4K so much. The 1080 @ 120fps sounds interesting but I don’t like that the slo-mo in 120 is “baked in” so to speak. I’m a hobbyist that can tolerate going up a couple extra bucks. Been using a gopro on a sabilizer to make videos of myself on a Onewheel and Boosted board. Would like to start setting up up shots on the fly (using a tripod of course), so I figured that the XF or the XA would be great for this kind of run & gun sports work. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. BTW - I have a Canon 5DM4 with a host of nice lenses. But, I don’t want to take chances damaging that gear, not to mention the extra work involved in using a DSLR for my uses.
@@BrokenToeKnee The two are essentially the same camera. The 50 is slightly smaller and weighs a hair less. Personally, I'd rather have the 4k/60 available whether I planned on using or not. Being able to reframe a shot and downsample to 1080 for delivery is worth the difference IMHO. 4k/60 also provides fairly decent slo-mo, if you decide you need it during editing. For me, there's nothing about the xa50 that would make me switch to it over the 400. There's really no reason to rob yourself of the extra functionality over such a minuscule price difference.
8:25 - this kind of shot could be dramatically improved by adding a small video light to the top of the camera. With you well lit, it focus the viewer on your face - effectively achieving a separation between you and the background.
@@nsnoesuarez I had it and i believe it didn't worth the price for me. It's a great camera with good autofocus, nice 4k and sLog. But the deal breaker for me was the zoom mechanism (and price) You could get the RX10m2 for less than half the price of RX10m4 and have the constant f/2.8 If you are interested only in video, i would buy the AX700.
@@K.Saniaga thanks for the info, I didn't take time to compare. You're right I'm only I'm planning to use it for video purposes and would take in consideration you're suggestion.
@@rexlibon8908 yes, if it is only for video the AX700 kick ass to RX10m4. You get double SD slot, HLG, better screen, longer battery, better ergonomics and ND filters. The only downside is the longer telephoto on the RX10m4 and wider lens 24mm vs 29mm.
*LIKED* doesn't the whole world aspire to be a hair shampoo model sitting next to a shallow pond in the middle of lush foliage whipping dripping wet hair about back & forth in 120 FPS Slow-Mo ?? After all ya gotta be realistic in ur ambitions
I use a Sony AX53 for both RUclips and commercial product demo use. The pro being ease of use. This one looks good but want to see what Sony comes up with in the next round of updates.
I went to the BMPCC4k (completely not practical for youtubers or people wanting to document family vacations...) but that's an image that kills DSLRs and Camcorders alike.
but they don't shoot nice LOOKING video... (compared to a mirrorless with a good fast lens) it LOOKS like camcorder footage. is it out of the realm of possibility for SOMEONE to produce a consumer camcorder that can do a bit more shallow dof?
so you are saying you are depending on the equipment to get a poss good video etc instead of going off your skills there is an old saying its not the camera it is the photographer videographer that makes the end product that is the problems with all of the young wannabe's today no skills
In all fairness to the stabilization though I was on a bus or walking around holding it up during it. I think it actually worked out pretty well for treating it like it was on a gimbal.
No clue why RUclipsrs always buy mirrorless camera's aside from the weight. Seems absolutely ridiculous to spend $5k+ on a DSLR and still have straight lines look like jello when you move too quick.
I use a Canon vixia hf-s100 as a webcam through a capture card. Does a solid job! Barnacules still uses a Sony FDR-AX53 for his content, looks fantastic.
The video movement is all over the place. Is this something people are experiencing with this camcorder? I don’t want to buy it if it’s really that bad...
I am a bit surprised as I have watched a lot of videos of the Canon HF G60 which is this AX50 without the top handle and they are really, I mean really smooth...you gotta admit, Everyday Dad is a pretty jumpy guy :)
For a run and gun setup, sure, this might work. I prefer DSLR setups more because as of today they are the closest thing to a cinema camera at a consumer-level price. They offer amazing tools also (zebra, histogram, log, depth of field, etc). And you will always get better audio from an audio dedicated recorder so not having XLR input on a DSLR setup isn't a dealbreaker. Another thing is video codec... On this camcorder, the codec won't be as strong meaning that color grading isn't very flexible and low light is very hard to achieve well. I think you should compare this camera with the Black Magic Pocket Cinema 4K and see which one you like better. The BMPCC4K easily dominates and excels at these features. So to conclude, if you're a run and gun videographer, sure this might be a good option. If you're a filmmaker (advanced or amateur) a DSLR might be a better choice. For stabilization, DJI Ronin S or Ronin M or glidecam paired with lens or IBIS works amazingly well. Just because one requires more effort to look good doesn't mean it isn't doable. A majority is going to hire the one that does each step well, not the one that hopes to get it right all in the camera with no post-processing required.
I had a Canon camcorder similar to this one (well much cheaper lol) but it had great features and I loved it. It was the easiest camera to shoot with I ever had, before my C200 😏
One of the things that put me off the GH4 ........ sensor dust, don’t Get that with a camcorder or bridge camera. Great review. 📹🎥📹🎥 The Sony RX10 ticks a lot of the boxes too.
Cool! Vacation near me! And I entered the world of "production" digital video with a Canon Vixia R700 (I did have an SJCAM 4000+ WiFi before that) -- not many of the "Pro" features of the XA50 -- but it also cost a lot less, yet shot great 1080p. And back in the day when my kids were young, I had a tried-and-true Sony 8mm camcorder that lasted for 12 years and had great autofocus -- and was just *easy* to use. As you say -- it's all there. You don't need a camera bag/backback/wheelie-bag with 15 pockets to carry extra lenses, monitors, rigs, gimbals -- etc. It's all there -- and you can add on better mics if needed, and a few extras. But for run-and-gun, or vacations, impromptu "pick-up" video, it is definitely much quicker to get going than a hybrid with all of the extras.... Thanks!
Bro! I appreciate this “lesson” in Camcorders vs Dslr- I wanna start filming outside for longer duration and many indie film friends are tellin me to go CAMCORDER and leave the Dslr at home for youtube content
Amazing Videos Everyday Dad!!! I need your advice. I am filming a fan-made Survivor Reality TV show in the forest. You have raved about both this Canon XA50 and the Sony NX80. Which one do you prefer?? We are talking about armatures shooting people running through the bush here not pros in a studio, which is why I'm steering away from DSLR's or mirrorless interchangeable lenses cams. We're talking literal run-and-gun. Also what microphone would you choose for an application like mine? Thanks! Love this channel so much!
I wrote off camcorders for DSLRs and Mirrorless because they are so 90's and soccer dad. But upon looking at them recently and comparing something like this XA50 to a mirrorless with cage + audio + DSLR monitor + powering all of it + choosing the right video settings... these start to become a compelling solution for people. Especially trying to recommend a video solution to someone that I KNOW doesn't have the level of interest we have in gear, they just want to film the family and occasional outings. Camcorders are definitely starting to have a place for my recommendations to people, which is so weird haha.
Great video & I agree, today’s camcorders are awesome! I’m still using a Canon G40 for 1080p. It’s dynamic image stabilization is great, but it also rides just fine on a Crane 2.
This is more camera for recording trips or events than for “cinematic looking footage“ I’d add external mic and some LED Light for low-light if I was going to record, for example, wedding with this one
I'm curious since the panasonic he x2000, canon xa 50, and sony hxr nx80 are around the same price range which is best for indoor sports and weddings. I'm also which has best fully auto performance. I'm focus on low light focus and zoom in auto and manual. I could use your expertise. Thanks.
As of today I found out that the XA50 is discontinued by Canon but there are several out there for purchase. I'm considering the XA70 BUT, it doesn't have a remote control option and the XA50 DOES. So, I have to make a decision soon. Got any ideas for me?
I'm curious since the panasonic he x2000, canon xa 50, and sony hxr nx80 are around the same price range which is best for indoor sports and weddings. I'm also which has best fully auto performance. I'm focus on low light focus and zoom in auto and manual. I could use your expertise. Thanks.
I find camcorders really underrated. While the hybrid cameras are getting better for video they are primarily photo cameras that happen to take video. Here's the main reason DSLRs and mirrorless cameras suck for video. Time limits. You get 10-30 minutes of continuous video unless you either hack the camera or send clean video out to a separate device. Your not going to or rather shouldn't use them to record say your kids sports event, concert, or other long event. Who knows what you'll miss when you hit that hard stop. You want reliable continuous recording for possibly hours. The second is heat issues. Camcorders are designed to stay cool with many hours of use most hybrid cameras will over heat. One thing I find depressing is you go back to the Vixia HF R800 and you can get 1080p 24-60 FPS, better low light preformance and 32x optical zoom. Thats the equivalent of more than 1200 mm. Not a professional camera but if you don't need 4K you may be better off. As for the AX 50, you'll actually get similar preformance out of the Vixia HF G50 for half the price. Canon missed the boat here. You're paying twice as much for a handle and XLR inputs. Most decent XLR mics need phantom power, it doesn't look like the AX 50 provides it, nor would you want it while on battery power.
On my other channel, i used a Sony 4k ax53 for 2 years, recently got a Sony A6400, other than colors being more accurate on the A6400, for me no real difference in video quality in 4k, in fact shot a 3 videos with both cameras in a talking head style, and the only way i knew what camera,was based on the file name
Hi michael. Im confused if i should get the ax53 or the a6400 as i do long gameplays which is around 4 to 6 hours. I currently have the canon m6 but it stops at 30min recording and i have to press the record button again which is annoying. What do you think is better for shooting long videos?
@@stevekdigitalworx yes it does and this makes it great. Having a bigger sensor feels like its a mini camcorder at a mirrorless camera size. Ax53 is tempting though. Haha
How good is the ZOOM lens on Manual focus? Can you zoom in tight, focus so its sharp and then pull back to a big wide angle shot with the camera remaining in focus through the zoom range and at the end? I know for a fact that the XF400 cannot do this.
During the Mini-DV wars, Sony and Canon were going at it neck and neck. I chose Sony and was very reluctant to shoot video with my DSLR camera at first. Love that you have put this back in the mix as they offer some great value for shooting/editing and getting a product that is excellent! Slo- Motion is tackled in post so not a big deal. Thanks for the great review..maybe you can do a Sony comparison in the future?!
Hey msn do you know if the galaxy note 10 supports the video and audio format this camera records in? Thanks. I edit on my note and I'm not buying it if it doesn't work with my note 10.
Kiko Vlog....I agree!! The AX53 is an underrated camera, that is both effective and yet affordable. If the price were to come down drastically for this camera, I would probably consider getting one.
Too expensive, I can buy two *Canon 800D for $1065 + Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM for $120 and the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 STM for $270* sub-total price = $1455 + 2 Canon LP-E17 battery for $160 total of $1615* subtract that from the price of the Canon XA50 toy which cost $2.200 you will still leave in tour pocket with $585 for a nice dinner.
I was told the XA45 is ok for Filming fast moving Aircraft, what they don't tell you is they say you should use a Tripod or Gimbal to get steady footage, too late as i already bought one, When filming Fast Aircraft the Camera image starts to shake using handheld, this ids really not good enough Canon.
You have so inspired me for my new channel. Your energy, your editing, and rehearsals are really something to emulate. If you ever get a chance, please drop by my channel and give me some advice. I’ve been going solo and self taught after retirement from my prior lovestyle. Really not trying to get anyone to subscribe, just need advice from a vet!
Great video thanks for sharing. Can you take a look at the Sony NX30, it's a few years old now but it's a fantastic run and gun camera a used one will be for those on a limited budget. I have 2 and they have been excellent.
okay, though i have watched the video 3 times, just to be clear..... i dont need the handle to record a video, i does have an onboard microphone right? sorry so long winded, but i wanna buy a 1" sensor camcorder for my trip to Greece and Italy next Feb. i would like to buy it soon.....
And you're stuck with Panasonic's inferior autofocus, a lens that doesn't cover 25-380mm and how much extra is the XLR module for the GH5? Once you've got all that stuff going on, you've got some pretty shitty ergonomics and 4K60 isnt everything. This camera designed for run and gun ENG situations and it does it pretty well.
Lance G - I considered the G60 as well. The price is right, dual pixel AF, etc. Then, I came across the XA50 with it’s XLR handle. I don’t care much about the XLR, but I like having the handle for run & gun shooting. THEN, I came across the XF400. The 400 has a better & bigger touch screen, dual processors and 4K 60p (which I’ll never use). So, I’m stuck trying to decide.
do you have to have the handle on it? does it have an onboard microphone so i dont have to use the handle, i guess the better question is... do i need to have the handle attached in order to film? or does it have its own microphone? great video by the way thanks for doing it?
Lovely camera. But the stabilization looks pretty shaky in this videos. Is it enabled? I think you are missing the point with content creators. We cannot be strapped to one single lens. A content creator doesn’t just vlog. Being able to play with different lenses and options is always handy to maximize your creations. It seems like a great C camera. Or overhead camera. I use for one of my channels as overhead the XC15 from Canon. Another pretty cool camera.
Pros: - Built-in XLR ports - Good autofocus because literally everything is in focus Cons: - Footage looks terrible and amateur - No LOG - Max 150Mbps recording - Somehow still has a 55min record limit despite having a tiny sensor, low bitrate, and a huge body. - Terrible dynamic range (just look at the blown out highlights when he talks about it) - No depth of field - Tiny sensor, so probably awful low light performance - Crappy screen, so you'd probably want a monitor anyways - Stabilization looks awful $1000 says after making this video he went right back to his mirrorless hybrid camera.
If you don’t need the grip with the physical controls for audio and the XLR-connectors, I find the Canon Vixia HF G60 the better buy. It is basically the same (OIS, 1 inch-sensor, same zoom lens, DPAF, built-in NDs, Wide Gamma Profile), but only uses 3,5mm in and out, and is cheaper with 1699$.
3” 460,000 dot screen versus 3.5” 1.4million dot screen. Dual processors. 4k60fps and 1080p 120fps (although, admittedly, there’s a catch with the 120).
@@BrokenToeKnee I don‘t really get, what you mean. I just checked the specs, the G60 and XA50 share the same 460.000 dot 3“ display, the Digic DV 6, 4k30 / 4k25 and 1080p60.
@@BrokenToeKnee Ah, you mean the Canon XF400 and GX10. These are actually even better buys. Only slightly heavier, bigger and pricier, but with 4k60 and 1080p120, better display and dual processors. Thanks for hidden advice ;-)
All your footage seems over exposed and the greens were weak. It's a nice camera. But nothing beats a Sony. Sorry boss-man, but you just proved why not to buy this camera. This is the camera worth buying: SONY PXW-Z280 4K
now wait just a damn minute... are you telling me a camera designed to do exactly what you need/want it for, is better than trying to adapt something else to do what you need/want?! WTF??!!
atlantamx3 as a Canon user - I'm surprised it came from Canon. Haha.
What is there to adapt if the camera has the features built in? Who said it was wrong to film with a DSLR/mirrorless?
@@RyKnocks It's not wrong, but why buy a stills camera with video features if you won't use it for stills? Just buy a video camera.
He has a point.
Saad Azzahrani Because in most cases, especially if you want a cinematic look, a camcorder isn’t going to give you the results you want and a cinema camera will be way out of budget.
Pick the right tool for what you’re trying to accomplish. None of it is right or wrong if you get the results that you want.
@@saadazzahrani if only Sony made a VG900 successor. It was the shit back in the day. E mount, full frame sensor handycam. But I'm afraid it's past the point of no return, and the stills camera form factor has taken over.
Thanks for the video. I use the "sister" of this camera, the Canon XF400, for demonstrations, quick interviews or press conferences, a super-solid camera that makes the classic (and heavy) TV cameras obsolete. Highly recommended for this type of work.
do u like the camera?
Thanks for this. Been debating between the XA50 & the XF400. I plan on using for making E-board videos of myself (using a tripod of course) and either of those two camcorders sounds great for what will be run & gun sports videos.
My first camera was the XA10 and I loved it ! Happy to see that this line of cameras keeps getting better.
Excellent product imo.
Cam corders are honestly great for RUclips.
Yeah its really darn good, I'm surprised at how much I like using these.
@@TheEverydayDad I think if more popular people would use them, they would become a hit.
Camcorder is the most Dad thing, from everyday dad
Heck yes!
depends what you want to do.
a dslr is useless for what i want to do. they dont zoom or auto focus at all well
@@TheEverydayDad for the low light performance, what do you recomended for now ? mostly for indoor use.
@@andyg3 Then you're using toy DSLRs.
@@stargazer7644 Not necessarily. I have a very expensive Mirrorless SLR which has good video quality, but the autofocus sucks. Both camcorders and DSLRs have pros and cons.
Glad to see an appreciation for new “traditional” camcorders. Now retired from a career in video production, I sometimes smh at all of the pieces of equipment people have to pack onto their DSLR cameras making them heavy and awkward!!
Obviously DSLRs with large sensors and interchangeable lenses have the advantage when shooting stills with great depth of field, but current semi-pro camcorders excel at the convenience of shooting lengthy video indoors and out (built-in neutral density filters!) and recording pro audio, be it via line level from a mixing board, XLR microphones or wireless mics.
Thnx much for this review!!
Can you explain what "shooting stills" means? Thank you.
@Land and Lore Photograph Off Road Adventures I get what your saying about carrying lens but I had the canon xa11camcorder and whilst amazing for filming, doesn't have flexibility in shooting raw on DsLr.
Ugh i know right. I start off as a kid frankensteining my dslr with audio recorder and random accessories. God it was scary. A wedding video company i work for even have one of those stupid saramonic audio splitter failed on me. I hate those things in high risk jobs.
Im in my 30s now by the time i upgrade to my sony x70 camcorders. I know when something is wrong with the camcorders and can change input manually in the body. I dont have things dropping off from the hotshoe mount of dslr and i can plug in to audio mixer and to wall power easily.
Coming from a kid that once frankenstein his way in the job It just feels so much more nicer easing of mind to know your tools dont have multiple weak links that will fail you.
Frankensteining should be used only in emergencies. Not the norm.
Same background, just not retired (yet), your post is so spot on.
For the vast majority of any type of work, a quality camcorder like the XA50 will do nearly all anyone needs, efficiently and effectively with the least hassles.
I’m also astounded at all the filmmaker wannabes who believe shallow DOF is everything. As if composition, lighting, telling the story with the camera, or content in story, acting, etc. weren’t as important. Study film history friends, there are a LOT of Oscar winning films with plenty of DOF in most shots, and not just the B+W classics like Citizen Kane.
Nice review. The XA50 has a nicer image than your other camera. I use the Canon C200 ... but, seeing the image, I would have just bought it.
Wait, what do you mean - C200 should be much better than XA50 isn't it?
Actually, the XA-50 footage looks better (interior) - than your A-roll camera
So glad to see you flying the flag for actually video cameras. We’ve been trying to bang that drum for a while!! When people complain about canon not offering enough for video I genuinely think they don’t realise they have a whole video & cinema range. The xa50 is a solid voice too!! Great video dude 🙌🙌
okay, this was not the video i meant to send the question to, sorry. I think you spelled it out pretty well, thanks for reading my question, your video was actuallly the only one that explained the handle, so...... thank you, Mike
I am glad that finally your obsession with blurry background is waning!
I always loved using the Canon XF300 camcorder for weddings which I would rent and my second videographer actually owned. He was full time in video and I was both photo and video. Nice to see an all in one camcorder XA50 with great zoom 4K inch sensor, great battery life, good sound. I am considering this again.
Thanks for posting. Camcorders are the best for most run & gun situations. There is a lot of marketing hype about dslr, hybrids & phones. To get decent footage from the iPhone you need an app, external lens, grip, mic etc 😀
I think it shines as a nice portable, take anywhere, camera for those places where you really can't take a fully rigged out dslr or mirrorless.
For RUclips videos the quality looks stellar. Lots of DR and detail in the image. The image looks quite a bit better than the front camera you are currently using. The front camera has a more cinematic and flat feel to it but I don't think that's beneficial for RUclips work such as this. XA50 looks to fit the bill much better with it's realistic and highly detailed image.
Hope you see this. Between the Canon and the Sony NX80? On the fence. I like the wider lens on the Canon but the physical buttons and slow motion on the Sony.
started off using the sony ax53 was a workhorse for me. Just upgraded to the a7iii and will be getting the a7siii. Great video OH
Honestly picture from this camcoder is much better than your's primary camera
the footage coming from that Canon looks great compared to the one filming you from directly in front, in my opinion..
Pictureworld Photography agreed
Sounds great!!! Looking like gun 👍
Thanks I was looking for a video like this for a long time. I use a Panasonic W850 camcorder for ages and wasn’t sure if I should go for a dslr or pro camcorder. I think I’ll stick with a camcorder because of all the features I don’t have to be an expert in.
I like this guy everyday dad but he could use some everyday landscaping for that backyard 😂😂
The colors off of the Canon are so much better than your standard setup it's not even funny.
photodiox has a cool in line variable ND fliter, not a switch, but fluidly moves into different exposures, great for video, far better than swapping between filters in camera because you donnt have to stop recording/have a filter change mid recording
Camcorder looks way much sharper & better quality image.. i have the XA50 and i love it
I’ve been looking at the XA50 & the XF400. I’m leaning towards the XF400 because of the screen, mainly. What are your thoughts about the LCD screen on the XA50?
@@BrokenToeKnee the LCD is not as good as a DSLR but that is not a problem for me.. is the final image that matter which is as you see in the video above is crystal clear even at a low light
I agree that final image quality is the most important factor.
You are happy with low light results? skin tones are good? Your thoughts on the stabilization? I am used to using a gimbal. I am deciding between this and Sony AX700
@@leotroy9877 Oh yess, I am really satisfied on everything, I mostly use it for the wedding documentaries, recording up to 8 hours per wedding, The stabilizer works perfect but most of the time I Use it on Monopod or tripod, the dynamic range it was a surprise, really good and the auto focus, face tracking etc, touch screen just perfect, it has 3 different color settings, neutral, standard and dynamic range
For a few dollars more, you can get 4k60 and HD120 in addition to everything you like about the xa50, I've been using the XF400 for a couple years now and it's well worth the money
is it good in low light?
@@ezra8776 It's OK in low light. Wide open is f2.8 with no zoom, f4 with full zoom. It's not the best, though. But you'll be paying much more for a camcorder that is good in low light. Since I do mainly daytime work and corp. video, I either have enough ambient light or can control lighting.
Ronnie Wallin Looks like you’re the guy I need to talk to. I’ve been trying to decide between the XA50 & the XF400. I’m leaning towards the XF400 mainly because of the LCD screen. I really don’t care about 4K so much. The 1080 @ 120fps sounds interesting but I don’t like that the slo-mo in 120 is “baked in” so to speak. I’m a hobbyist that can tolerate going up a couple extra bucks. Been using a gopro on a sabilizer to make videos of myself on a Onewheel and Boosted board. Would like to start setting up up shots on the fly (using a tripod of course), so I figured that the XF or the XA would be great for this kind of run & gun sports work. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. BTW - I have a Canon 5DM4 with a host of nice lenses. But, I don’t want to take chances damaging that gear, not to mention the extra work involved in using a DSLR for my uses.
@@BrokenToeKnee The two are essentially the same camera. The 50 is slightly smaller and weighs a hair less. Personally, I'd rather have the 4k/60 available whether I planned on using or not. Being able to reframe a shot and downsample to 1080 for delivery is worth the difference IMHO. 4k/60 also provides fairly decent slo-mo, if you decide you need it during editing. For me, there's nothing about the xa50 that would make me switch to it over the 400. There's really no reason to rob yourself of the extra functionality over such a minuscule price difference.
Thanks for the info. I’m with you on liking to have options. And then there’s the LCD screen on the 400. Plus dual digic 6’s.
8:25 - this kind of shot could be dramatically improved by adding a small video light to the top of the camera. With you well lit, it focus the viewer on your face - effectively achieving a separation between you and the background.
Just get the Sony RX10IV paired with an old smartphone when blogging and have it all.
I also have the desire to have a RX10IV
@@nsnoesuarez I had it and i believe it didn't worth the price for me.
It's a great camera with good autofocus, nice 4k and sLog. But the deal breaker for me was the zoom mechanism (and price)
You could get the RX10m2 for less than half the price of RX10m4 and have the constant f/2.8
If you are interested only in video, i would buy the AX700.
@@K.Saniaga thanks for the info, I didn't take time to compare. You're right I'm only I'm planning to use it for video purposes and would take in consideration you're suggestion.
@@rexlibon8908 yes, if it is only for video the AX700 kick ass to RX10m4. You get double SD slot, HLG, better screen, longer battery, better ergonomics and ND filters.
The only downside is the longer telephoto on the RX10m4 and wider lens 24mm vs 29mm.
If you ever do corporate video, camcorders are great. Less hassle and the client probably doesn't care about your depth of field.
I'll take one!!!
looks at price: hmmmm ill just stick to my a6400 lol
Comic Hero a6400 is a beast
Do you ever notice the whole "Shallow depth of field omg it's gotta blur the background" is a RUclips thing? Rarely do you see such DOF in Hollywood.
*LIKED* doesn't the whole world aspire to be a hair shampoo model sitting next to a shallow pond in the middle of lush foliage whipping dripping wet hair about back & forth in 120 FPS Slow-Mo ?? After all ya gotta be realistic in ur ambitions
It is actually a photography thing. When you don't have motion to direct the eye to the subject, you use focus.
I make content with a camcorder the sony ax53 the battery life is a huge advantage and the build in gimbal
ExploringAndMe agreed! I too have the AX53 - a great camera. For must run and gun situations the camcorder is the best tool.😀
I use a Sony AX53 for both RUclips and commercial product demo use. The pro being ease of use. This one looks good but want to see what Sony comes up with in the next round of updates.
I went to the BMPCC4k (completely not practical for youtubers or people wanting to document family vacations...) but that's an image that kills DSLRs and Camcorders alike.
Hey , can you explain why it isn't practical for RUclips or home videos? I was planning in getting one for that purpose. Thanks!
but they don't shoot nice LOOKING video... (compared to a mirrorless with a good fast lens) it LOOKS like camcorder footage. is it out of the realm of possibility for SOMEONE to produce a consumer camcorder that can do a bit more shallow dof?
so you are saying you are depending on the equipment to get a poss good video etc instead of going off your skills
there is an old saying
its not the camera it is the photographer videographer that makes the end product
that is the problems with all of the young wannabe's today no skills
I actually found the "B" cam camcorder footage better looking than his "A" cam which I believe is a Nikon Z6.
@@damiengvideos4337 It seems to be that the Z6 footage was slightly out of focus.
@@gfinnstrom Here take my Vixia HF R800 and get some good 4k footage out of it then.
Want even better footage get a 50mm film camera :-P
Hi there, does the cam record 4K internally and hdmi out (to a switcher etc) at the same time?
Thanks for the great video. I have to say it looks pretty good minus the stabilization. It looks pretty weak to my eye.
In all fairness to the stabilization though I was on a bus or walking around holding it up during it. I think it actually worked out pretty well for treating it like it was on a gimbal.
This would be the perfect camera for Camera Conspiracies! Someone notify him! 😂😜
All he wants is the perfect camera.
The Camera Guy: lol
He wants a flippy screen on a ladder, hammer, bicycle and everything out there
Such a compact package... Lacking proper slomo? 😂 My Osmo Action has it... How compact is that..? 😎
Slomo can be achieved in post
That price though. I will stick with my Vixia HF R800
No clue why RUclipsrs always buy mirrorless camera's aside from the weight. Seems absolutely ridiculous to spend $5k+ on a DSLR and still have straight lines look like jello when you move too quick.
I use a Canon vixia hf-s100 as a webcam through a capture card. Does a solid job! Barnacules still uses a Sony FDR-AX53 for his content, looks fantastic.
Oh nice! Yeah we dont talk about camcorders enough and I think I'm going to start featuring them more.
@@TheEverydayDad awesome!
I actually used the Sony AX53 for a bit
The stabilization seems really bad... I don’t understand why you’re so excited.
Cause its a canon product lol.
The video movement is all over the place. Is this something people are experiencing with this camcorder? I don’t want to buy it if it’s really that bad...
I am a bit surprised as I have watched a lot of videos of the Canon HF G60 which is this AX50 without the top handle and they are really, I mean really smooth...you gotta admit, Everyday Dad is a pretty jumpy guy :)
You should do a video testing the infrared capabilities!Canon camcorders have always had this feature!
THis is super helpful since I'm renting a XA50 this week to test it out. Would you do a video on the focus ability of this camera? Thanks!!
For a run and gun setup, sure, this might work. I prefer DSLR setups more because as of today they are the closest thing to a cinema camera at a consumer-level price. They offer amazing tools also (zebra, histogram, log, depth of field, etc). And you will always get better audio from an audio dedicated recorder so not having XLR input on a DSLR setup isn't a dealbreaker. Another thing is video codec... On this camcorder, the codec won't be as strong meaning that color grading isn't very flexible and low light is very hard to achieve well. I think you should compare this camera with the Black Magic Pocket Cinema 4K and see which one you like better. The BMPCC4K easily dominates and excels at these features. So to conclude, if you're a run and gun videographer, sure this might be a good option. If you're a filmmaker (advanced or amateur) a DSLR might be a better choice. For stabilization, DJI Ronin S or Ronin M or glidecam paired with lens or IBIS works amazingly well. Just because one requires more effort to look good doesn't mean it isn't doable. A majority is going to hire the one that does each step well, not the one that hopes to get it right all in the camera with no post-processing required.
i just bought this camera, my first camcorder! hope it goes well
I had a Canon camcorder similar to this one (well much cheaper lol) but it had great features and I loved it. It was the easiest camera to shoot with I ever had, before my C200 😏
What type of it?
One of the things that put me off the GH4 ........ sensor dust, don’t Get that with a camcorder or bridge camera. Great review. 📹🎥📹🎥 The Sony RX10 ticks a lot of the boxes too.
Cool! Vacation near me! And I entered the world of "production" digital video with a Canon Vixia R700 (I did have an SJCAM 4000+ WiFi before that) -- not many of the "Pro" features of the XA50 -- but it also cost a lot less, yet shot great 1080p. And back in the day when my kids were young, I had a tried-and-true Sony 8mm camcorder that lasted for 12 years and had great autofocus -- and was just *easy* to use. As you say -- it's all there. You don't need a camera bag/backback/wheelie-bag with 15 pockets to carry extra lenses, monitors, rigs, gimbals -- etc. It's all there -- and you can add on better mics if needed, and a few extras. But for run-and-gun, or vacations, impromptu "pick-up" video, it is definitely much quicker to get going than a hybrid with all of the extras.... Thanks!
Bro! I appreciate this “lesson” in Camcorders vs Dslr- I wanna start filming outside for longer duration and many indie film friends are tellin me to go CAMCORDER and leave the Dslr at home for youtube content
Amazing Videos Everyday Dad!!! I need your advice. I am filming a fan-made Survivor Reality TV show in the forest. You have raved about both this Canon XA50 and the Sony NX80. Which one do you prefer?? We are talking about armatures shooting people running through the bush here not pros in a studio, which is why I'm steering away from DSLR's or mirrorless interchangeable lenses cams. We're talking literal run-and-gun. Also what microphone would you choose for an application like mine? Thanks! Love this channel so much!
I wrote off camcorders for DSLRs and Mirrorless because they are so 90's and soccer dad. But upon looking at them recently and comparing something like this XA50 to a mirrorless with cage + audio + DSLR monitor + powering all of it + choosing the right video settings... these start to become a compelling solution for people. Especially trying to recommend a video solution to someone that I KNOW doesn't have the level of interest we have in gear, they just want to film the family and occasional outings. Camcorders are definitely starting to have a place for my recommendations to people, which is so weird haha.
Been looking at this to do travel vlogs. Thanks for the review.
Great video & I agree, today’s camcorders are awesome! I’m still using a Canon G40 for 1080p. It’s dynamic image stabilization is great, but it also rides just fine on a Crane 2.
Wow, it’s only $2000 dollars. I might buy 2 of them right after I sell that extra kidney of mine.
I'm buying one after I buy the new MacPro, monitor and the $1,000 stand
If a camcorder doesn't have a fixed aperture it's not professional imo
Well then you're all set. The camera has aperture priority mode.
My first legit camera in 2009 for YT was a movie camera..The JVC EVERIO GZ-HD40 LOL
I’m all for camcorders and always will be
Me too!
This is more camera for recording trips or events than for “cinematic looking footage“
I’d add external mic and some LED Light for low-light if I was going to record, for example, wedding with this one
I'd rather have 1080p with C-Log than 4K without C-Log.
I agree. Just make sure its C log in 1080 10 bit 4:2:2 not 8bit 4:2:0. C log even in 4K 4:2:0 is useless.
Good review !!
I'm curious since the panasonic he x2000, canon
xa 50, and sony hxr nx80 are around the same
price range which is best for indoor sports and
weddings. I'm also which has best fully auto
performance. I'm focus on low light focus and zoom
in auto and manual. I could use your expertise.
Thanks.
As of today I found out that the XA50 is discontinued by Canon but there are several out there for purchase. I'm considering the XA70 BUT, it doesn't have a remote control option and the XA50 DOES. So, I have to make a decision soon. Got any ideas for me?
I'm curious since the panasonic he x2000, canon
xa 50, and sony hxr nx80 are around the same
price range which is best for indoor sports and
weddings. I'm also which has best fully auto
performance. I'm focus on low light focus and zoom
in auto and manual. I could use your expertise.
Thanks.
i took the family to go ride life-size Thomas and Percy trains over the weekend, and I was thinking about you. i spotted so many camcorders!
I find camcorders really underrated. While the hybrid cameras are getting better for video they are primarily photo cameras that happen to take video.
Here's the main reason DSLRs and mirrorless cameras suck for video. Time limits. You get 10-30 minutes of continuous video unless you either hack the camera or send clean video out to a separate device. Your not going to or rather shouldn't use them to record say your kids sports event, concert, or other long event. Who knows what you'll miss when you hit that hard stop. You want reliable continuous recording for possibly hours. The second is heat issues. Camcorders are designed to stay cool with many hours of use most hybrid cameras will over heat.
One thing I find depressing is you go back to the Vixia HF R800 and you can get 1080p 24-60 FPS, better low light preformance and 32x optical zoom. Thats the equivalent of more than 1200 mm. Not a professional camera but if you don't need 4K you may be better off.
As for the AX 50, you'll actually get similar preformance out of the Vixia HF G50 for half the price. Canon missed the boat here. You're paying twice as much for a handle and XLR inputs. Most decent XLR mics need phantom power, it doesn't look like the AX 50 provides it, nor would you want it while on battery power.
I might subscribe to you - you're that good man ! Clear, concise and enthusiastic opinions and facts .
Is the XA40 just as powerful? I'm considering that after making do many vidoes with a Osmo Pocket and external audio.
On my other channel, i used a Sony 4k ax53 for 2 years, recently got a Sony A6400, other than colors being more accurate on the A6400, for me no real difference in video quality in 4k, in fact shot a 3 videos with both cameras in a talking head style, and the only way i knew what camera,was based on the file name
Hi michael. Im confused if i should get the ax53 or the a6400 as i do long gameplays which is around 4 to 6 hours. I currently have the canon m6 but it stops at 30min recording and i have to press the record button again which is annoying. What do you think is better for shooting long videos?
@@sanghuloom6943 the 6400 as I understand eliminated the 30 minute barrier.
@@stevekdigitalworx yes it does and this makes it great. Having a bigger sensor feels like its a mini camcorder at a mirrorless camera size. Ax53 is tempting though. Haha
This just got firmware update to include Canon clog and this outputs 1080p HDMI 422 10bit to external recorder.
How good is the ZOOM lens on Manual focus? Can you zoom in tight, focus so its sharp and then pull back to a big wide angle shot with the camera remaining in focus through the zoom range and at the end? I know for a fact that the XF400 cannot do this.
During the Mini-DV wars, Sony and Canon were going at it neck and neck. I chose Sony and was very reluctant to shoot video with my DSLR camera at first. Love that you have put this back in the mix as they offer some great value for shooting/editing and getting a product that is excellent! Slo- Motion is tackled in post so not a big deal. Thanks for the great review..maybe you can do a Sony comparison in the future?!
Great video, thanks! I assume it can be used for live-streaming
Hey msn do you know if the galaxy note 10 supports the video and audio format this camera records in? Thanks. I edit on my note and I'm not buying it if it doesn't work with my note 10.
Been waiting forever for someone to do a review/ record some footage with it. Thanks!
looks like sony ax700 ;p if you are looking for cheap version camcorder, get sony ax53, its steel great :)
Kiko Vlog....I agree!! The AX53 is an underrated camera, that is both effective and yet affordable. If the price were to come down drastically for this camera, I would probably consider getting one.
Too expensive, I can buy two *Canon 800D for $1065 + Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM for $120 and the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 STM for $270* sub-total price = $1455 + 2 Canon LP-E17 battery for $160 total of $1615* subtract that from the price of the Canon XA50 toy which cost $2.200 you will still leave in tour pocket with $585 for a nice dinner.
I was told the XA45 is ok for Filming fast moving Aircraft, what they don't tell you is they say you should use a Tripod or Gimbal to get steady footage, too late as i already bought one, When filming Fast Aircraft the Camera image starts to shake using handheld, this ids really not good enough Canon.
Nice review! I wish every reviewer is enthusiastic like you. Camcorders are for recording videos and DSLRs are for pictures. I got it!
Love the unicorn! (By the pool)
With all the nd filters and crap it would be nice if it also had a polarization lens too
You have so inspired me for my new channel. Your energy, your editing, and rehearsals are really something to emulate. If you ever get a chance, please drop by my channel and give me some advice. I’ve been going solo and self taught after retirement from my prior lovestyle. Really not trying to get anyone to subscribe, just need advice from a vet!
DSLRs were made to take photos. It'll become a toast if you use it to record an hour continuously. When the young generation will understand this?
First a Buckeye Doughnuts shirt then a Melt shirt.
My dude, where are you at or from in Ohio? Lol
SD card, doesn't it have an internal storage too? Xa10 and xa 35 do , love both of those thinking about xa40,50,55 next.
Wow so expensive though. I am waiting for the GoPro 8 hoping for slow motion 960!!! Thanks for the video
Great video thanks for sharing.
Can you take a look at the Sony NX30, it's a few years old now but it's a fantastic run and gun camera a used one will be for those on a limited budget.
I have 2 and they have been excellent.
okay, though i have watched the video 3 times, just to be clear..... i dont need the handle to record a video, i does have an onboard microphone right? sorry so long winded, but i wanna buy a 1" sensor camcorder for my trip to Greece and Italy next Feb. i would like to buy it soon.....
Really? GH5, 2/3 of the price or Gh5 + ND + Good Lens, same price, 4k60fps
And you're stuck with Panasonic's inferior autofocus, a lens that doesn't cover 25-380mm and how much extra is the XLR module for the GH5? Once you've got all that stuff going on, you've got some pretty shitty ergonomics and 4K60 isnt everything. This camera designed for run and gun ENG situations and it does it pretty well.
Sony NX80 or this Canon what do you prefer ?
blackmagic someone?????
Love my Canon Vixia HF G21 I purchased at launch last year. Will be picking up the cousin to this camera the new HF G60
Lance G - I considered the G60 as well. The price is right, dual pixel AF, etc. Then, I came across the XA50 with it’s XLR handle. I don’t care much about the XLR, but I like having the handle for run & gun shooting. THEN, I came across the XF400. The 400 has a better & bigger touch screen, dual processors and 4K 60p (which I’ll never use). So, I’m stuck trying to decide.
So it edits my videos?
do you have to have the handle on it? does it have an onboard microphone so i dont have to use the handle, i guess the better question is... do i need to have the handle attached in order to film? or does it have its own microphone? great video by the way thanks for doing it?
Lovely camera. But the stabilization looks pretty shaky in this videos. Is it enabled? I think you are missing the point with content creators. We cannot be strapped to one single lens. A content creator doesn’t just vlog. Being able to play with different lenses and options is always handy to maximize your creations. It seems like a great C camera. Or overhead camera. I use for one of my channels as overhead the XC15 from Canon. Another pretty cool camera.
the video quality looks awful. your mirrorless still looks much much better.
Pros:
- Built-in XLR ports
- Good autofocus because literally everything is in focus
Cons:
- Footage looks terrible and amateur
- No LOG
- Max 150Mbps recording
- Somehow still has a 55min record limit despite having a tiny sensor, low bitrate, and a huge body.
- Terrible dynamic range (just look at the blown out highlights when he talks about it)
- No depth of field
- Tiny sensor, so probably awful low light performance
- Crappy screen, so you'd probably want a monitor anyways
- Stabilization looks awful
$1000 says after making this video he went right back to his mirrorless hybrid camera.
If you don’t need the grip with the physical controls for audio and the XLR-connectors, I find the Canon Vixia HF G60 the better buy. It is basically the same (OIS, 1 inch-sensor, same zoom lens, DPAF, built-in NDs, Wide Gamma Profile), but only uses 3,5mm in and out, and is cheaper with 1699$.
3” 460,000 dot screen versus 3.5” 1.4million dot screen. Dual processors. 4k60fps and 1080p 120fps (although, admittedly, there’s a catch with the 120).
@@BrokenToeKnee I don‘t really get, what you mean. I just checked the specs, the G60 and XA50 share the same 460.000 dot 3“ display, the Digic DV 6, 4k30 / 4k25 and 1080p60.
@@BrokenToeKnee Ah, you mean the Canon XF400 and GX10. These are actually even better buys. Only slightly heavier, bigger and pricier, but with 4k60 and 1080p120, better display and dual processors. Thanks for hidden advice ;-)
Sorry! My mistake. I should have proof read my post.
I was comparing the XA50 & the XF400.
All your footage seems over exposed and the greens were weak.
It's a nice camera. But nothing beats a Sony.
Sorry boss-man, but you just proved why not to buy this camera.
This is the camera worth buying: SONY PXW-Z280 4K