Flat Earth 'evidence' That SHOWS CURVATURE
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 дек 2022
- The Guinness World Record holding photograph by Mark Bret is often cited by Flat Earthers of proof that the Earth can't be curved, but if you actually break the image down, it proves the existence of curvature
Please consider supporting the channel by making purchases through my Amazon affiliates: geni.us/Affiliate
PATREON: / davemckeegan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Music by Bensound.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#flatearth #globe #picgaspard #worldrecord 
Наука
NASA paid the mountain to look smaller.
It was in the budget this time so why not.
@Doom Rustler do they pay every single person other than flat earthers then?
@Doom Rustler stupid answer
@Doom Rustler Just tailored to the interlocutor, my guy.
@Doom Rustler I’m pretty sure he’s joking.
It gets even better when they spend $20000 on a gyroscope and find... what was it?
a 15 degree per hour drift
Thanks, Bob
Thanks, Bob 👍
Got to love the Globebusters, they've managed to do more to prove a globe than most other people have 🤣
Thanks Bob.
Oh yeah i remember that they tried everything they could to insulate that, too. claiming "interference" eventually after putting it in an elaborate contraption to insulate it they still found the 15-degree drift LOL
and what did they do with their findings they ignored them and pretended they did not see it
@@thecraftycreeper3167 ,
Well... they needed their revenue stream... spending $20,000 on a laser gyroscope doesn't provide them with the necessities of life...
I love how flatties will regularly use this image as "proof of flat earth", yet when I've asked in the past why I can't see the mountains of Ireland from Wales here in the UK, the response is usually, "Our eyes can't see that far", yet it's less than half the distance.
Ireland is out of render distance. You need to get closer before the server starts loading in those chunks. Press F5 when you get to the shore.
don't tell them about the moon then...
@@jayarenneilson6049oh they think the moon doesn't exist and the sky is one big hologram put up by "the government" and bring up some crap about a 'project bluebeam'
@@ketdog1860 we don't have the distant LOD meshes for Ireland, they're packaged with the DLC.
Well you can certainly see the whole of the Isle of Man from the summit of Scafell. Ireland is not much further.
you know whats funny that that advanced curve calculator had more "science" in it than all of the flerf talking points combined.
god dammit I just said that, my dude lol
Well, yea that's kind of a given
might wanna get with reality and look into the Antikythera Mechanism
What's a flerf?
@@deanhall6045you
I like that with "this would be too far away to see on a globe" pictures, they never seem to notice that a huge chunk of the bottom of what they're looking at is missing.
Damn lie
QUESTION? DOES A DISC (PAPER PLATE) APPEAR TO HAVE CURVATURE? IS IT STILL FLAT?
they're looking at; just saying.
@@kevinmould6979 I'm gonna go with it was probably late at night when I wrote this comment, but I should've caught this mistake. It's fixed.
@@dougsdiagnostics6784a paper plate curves around the edges, but has zero droppoff curve. Also, the horizon is always equally far 360 degrees around. If you were on a paper plate earth, and further toward the outside or the closer you got to antarctic wall, the horizon would not be equally far each direction. As you'd be approaching closer to the edge of Earth. The only way the horizon would be equally far on a flat earth each direction, if if you were always standing directly in the center of the plate earth.
Flat earthers are some of the most expert in things they've never done.
They're very very expert.
They are definitely an ex pert.
Like getting them to make working models, without ANY globular geometry.. hahaha 👍
They are the giant midgets of Flerftopia.
Isn't this the case with most citizen-scientists??
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: Everyone needs to ask to see the planned route to the "ice wall" on the MAP OF EARTH that will be used to navigate there. If it turns out to be the Flatearth map, I'll buy it.
That doggo doesn't care if the Earth is flat or a globe, it's just there for the love!
Gotta love flerfs' double standards: they pretend "you can see too far" by leaving out refraction, and then proceed to forget _you can never see far enough_ to be on their imaginary pancake.
Yeah, funny how we can only see a few miles at most beyond what we should be able to see on a globe based on geometry, perfectly explained by refraction, why can't we see, for example, Ghana from Scotland?
Yeah they can never answer the question of why I can't see the giant ice wall with a telescope.
@@charlestownsend9280 true, and yet we can still see Venus from here with a telescope 🤷♂️ one thing I still can't understand is how the northern hemisphere can be "explained" with a flat earth model, yet it quickly falls apart when you bring in the southern hemisphere, and that's why they show memes of Australia instead cuz they can't explain it away, so they just throw the south out of the window...
Its called "moving the goal post" Their entire flat earth model is based on it.
@@peekster0 It is also why no "smart flat earther believer" (aka con artist) will present positive claims for a flat earth. They will only try to "debunk" the globe because all claims made about the earth being flat are not backed up by reality.
Flerfs: "This world record proves the earth is flat."
Devil's Advocate: "Really? So why is the world record *only* 443km then?"
To play devil's advocate to your advocate, there is a maximum optical range that exists for our atmosphere (depending on atmospheric density and particulates in the atmosphere) that can prevent seeing those distances normally. But that is also a problem for flat earthers because the clearer the atmosphere, the farther we should see which is the opposite of what happens in reality. So if the Earth truly was flat, then flat earthers should see farther on clear days...yet is evidenced by their own Black Swan that is "clearly" not the case.
Flerfs: Wtf is km? How many miles is that? We are not smart enough to understand metric units.
@@Teutonius88 How long is a light year? Flat Earther response:- Well, it's very light so I'd say about four months...
@@chrisantoniou4366 Alternatively: A light year is a year with less alcohol/calories in it. :P
@@doublemonkey4833 😄
The Earth is definitely flat. I keep losing my lawn mowers because I live near the edge, and I have to be very careful when I throw the frisbee for the dog.
Have you tried doing bungee jumping at the edge of our pizza? It sounds like a great place to try but I'm afraid the giant flying turtle underneath might catch me for a snack...
@@Alan-ez6jiyou cant reach the edge, its surrounded by an ice wall! Wait, is that game of thrones? No, nvm thats flat earth 🤦🏻♂️
@@gsdtdeaux7 ha ha ha... I think you are watching too many science fiction movies and animation cartoons...
Try to get education instead.
I really appreciate how this channel has a minimal amount of "gawking at the loonies" and bullying. I feel like insulting the beliefs of people like flat earthers only drives them further into their echo chambers. I know many of them will refuse to listen to calm rationality and reason, but it's still the best course of action if we want any of them to come around to science. A lot of flat earth debunk channels lay on the righteousness and basically bully flat earthers for believing what they do, and if that's the main focus of someone's content then they're just picking on people, and it's not very educational. Thats why this channel is awesome, you poke a little fun but it's not to the point of being cruel or self righteous, and for the most part your just presenting the evidence. I think that's great.
Well said 🙂👌
No harm in taking the high road but it's a fallacy to pretend this is more likely to "bring them around" than just laughing at them. Who is being convinced to switch over? You don't see these people in the comments.
@@StealthBoyElite I said I don't think it will reach very many of them. Any approach will be minimally effective in a group like flat earthers. It think it might be slightly more effective than flat out bullying however. People don't respond positively to their beliefs being mocked. It's a good way to get someone to shut down completely, and if it's in the name of science that they are being bullied well then it pushes them even further away from the truth. I'm not saying this is some grand method for converting all flat earthers I'm just saying it might represent our side better if we aren't assholes about it.
@quinbatcheller5805 " A lot of flat earth debunk channels lay on the righteousness and basically bully flat earthers for believing what they do, and if that's the main focus of someone's content then they're just picking on people, and it's not very educational. "
Hey, NotReallyAProfessorDave, are you listening?
No, he's not. He never does.
I only was responding to someone as to why I have doubts about the globe model an RUclips blocks my comment I've rarely hady comments just not posted if they are just my opinions an not rude or anything, an there need to preface anything they don't prefer with a warning over every video an there ability to only have pro globe info come up when your trying to look up the opposite is kinda weird but hey wat do ik I'm crazy for being skeptical of possible video editing
I very much enjoy the vibe of the video, it's not demeaning or ridiculing. At the same time being very informative. Please do keep making content like this.
Thank you, I will certainly aim to keep this vibe in my videos - although Nathan Oakley has published a video trying to destroy one of my videos that I need to address, so I can't promise there won't be some sarcasm creeping its way in on that one :)
it is still made up fantasy excuses of earth being a cartoon ball.
@@DaveMcKeegan Im sure its for a good cause so you will be forgiven lol ;)
I mean, tbh, with how condescending flerfs are and how confidently incorrect they always manage to be, they deserved the ridicule
@@mynamemylastname7179 earth is a sphere, this is a scientific fact. Your little fairytale called FE on the other hand got no working model, no working map and no science to support it. Maybe you should try to complete a science class instead of falling for every dumb conspiracy out there.
Thank you flat Earthers! Without you, this amazing video wouldn’t exist and I wouldn’t have learned about atmospheric refraction
Yes. Reading their inane posts tells us nothing new about them, whereas when ppl with good science background explain/illustrate a topic, most of us learn something new.
yeah - it's always the refraction ... no matter what humidity or temp. loool
this can't be always the fact - by definition not.
@@carlosdenevier9538 As said in this video, this only did get captured once and is extremely rare and isn’t usually there. If there was a flat earth this would always be visible lol. And even then the mountains aren’t the right height for the flat earth to work haha.
Honestly I'm kinda glad flat earthers exist due to this reason. Their unexplainable delusion has allowed competent folk to explain it away and teach me something new in the process
The flat-earth theory triggered so much thinking about topic we took for granted and let us learn about things we never ever thought of. They should get a prize for popularization of science!
What’s so funny again is that the individual that took the pic explains how and why it was done. And a flat earther still wants to try and use this to prove the earth is flat. These are quickly becoming my favorite videos.
3:25 you went quiet so quickly i was fully expecting a facetime call to come in 😂
The fact that the mountain is only visible under the right conditions also proves that atmospheric distortion has to be involved, because otherwise that would mean the mountain is magically shrinking and growing or disappearing and reappearing. But flat earthers only ever seem to care about natural phenomenon when they can try to manipulate it in their favour.
I love your dog btw.
It always amazes me when flerfers go "look, we can see this thing that is X miles away", because the answer is always "yes, but can you see what is Y miles away"? Keep going a little longer ffs, if the earth was truly flat you would be able to see any part of it from any other part.
I once had a nightmare that I could see the Statue of Liberty from my own building when zoomed in despite the fact that I was looking directly south and I'm in Croatia. If we existed on a flat Earth, the things we see would be marginally different.
@@godslaughter If we existed on a flat earth the things we would see would be *radically* different.
I'm trying to manipulate this light beam, in my favour of course. You see, no expert, not even super stooge Degrasse Tyson can explain how a light beam, which cannot be manipulated, can hit a target let's say, 1,000 miles away. Sure, he tries to baffle you with absolute crap but he never fully answers the question, because he can't. Mate, I couldnt give a rats bum if Earth is round or flat, I reckon its both, but its inconsequential, it matters not to me. But when you see someone so absolutely committed to something, this guy has made heaps of videos ridiculing flat earth believers, so intent, hell bent on proving or disproving something, I begin to think something else is going on. Have you seen Neil shout down conversation with his hosts that even slightly question what he says ? That's a stooge at work, much like I'm guessing this bloke is, I pick stooges like a nose and here's one right here, pushing too hard. So,... light beam, ship 1,000 miles away, how can this light beam, which does not bend or refract, hit the ship. Over to you mate. I'm up for an explanation but be warned, bull shit don't fly.
@@carljohan9265 hahaha you're hilarious. You can with a good telescope, see a ship for days. How can you hit something 1,000 miles away with a lazer beam ffs. You people, because you outnumber the other people are so arrogant but can't respond to that simple equation. By the way, I don't care. It's round and flat.
I truly believe that flat earthers are gaslighting the rest of us into teaching them 8th grade science.
If that was true, they would all have gone away by now.
And when they pass finger painting lessons, they'll be ready...
@@tysondog843 They have to stop eating their crayons first.
If that's the case, then the flerfers must be mad that their 8th grade science teacher wasn't interesting them.
No actually we are using you to explain it over and over again so everyone can hear how flippin stupid the globe is.
its hilarious that there are MULTIPLE ARGUMENTS _AND_ EXPERIMENTS that tried to prove the earth is flat that did the opposite
As a Physicist myself, I tip my hat at this brilliant and THOROUGH explanation!
Well done.
Have you seen a compilation of” IT LOOKS FLAT TO ME”
You late on the agenda fam
I call it lies
A good educated pysicist from the government school
@@user-qk1lg7ll4ppysicist
Brainwashed
Never think you are stupid. You may feel that way at times, we all do, but just remember there are flat Earthers. It will bring your confidence right back!
Never think you are stupid is how flerfs came to be
It also works when you question your sanity.
stupid ruclips.net/video/sA7jbRojtCM/видео.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9
ruclips.net/video/EtIfX2TJ_08/видео.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi
Does it make you feel better calling people stupid? Most folks aren’t taught why they even believe in a globe earth. They just repeat what they were told.
Came for the flerf, stayed for the doggo! 🐕
The dog is in my opinion THE best of his vids🥰❤️
@@jasmijnariel It's just a dog though🤔
looks just like the dog we had growing up! now i miss her...
@@jimmorrison2657 never ever say its "just a dog"! 😱 dogs are gold
@@jasmijnariel Thanks for the info 👍
I love how Dave just stops talking for a second looks at his dog and goes “do you mind? My jeans don’t need cleaning.” And then goes back to the topic
I love how you love that...oh and my dog loves how i love how u love that .. which, being palondromic andvall, proves that the earth is, as it turns out, flat... it just looks as tho youre a twwat bc of looming. Thats Q.E.D. aint it..
The Flat Earthers will also claim that a unicorn licked your trousers, not a dog.
Flerfs are indirectly responsible for so much of the new knowledge I have obtained. From relativity (Witsit) to the celestial navigation (Oakley and Bitchel From Australia) to the more common flerf derp arguments that are gravity, the coriolis effect, perspective and laser ring gyroscopes (Thanks Bob!) as well as the plethora of other complete misunderstandings of science that flerfs seem to excrete. Thanks guys, I really appreciate it =)
ruclips.net/video/qEaHjPF47_E/видео.html
Flerf stupidity is a great excuse for the rest of us to learn!
@@redstonewarrior0152 No need to get emotional and triggered.
@@FlattyMcTruth I don’t think they were. It seems more like sarcasm. And this is coming from someone with autism that has a hard enough time catching sarcasm is speech.
The flat eart theory triggered so much thinking about topic we took for granted and let us learn about things we never ever thought of. They should get a prize for popularization of science!
My thoughts are that a Flat Earther is going to ignore everything you just said if they even bothered to watch.
Resist they can all forms of evidence and reasoning.
@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 There, there, you sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll desperately wanting to keep their deceitful job. Hopefully, you have had all your jabs during the last two years, blatant deceiving liars, such as you, deserve all that comes your way.
Due to the Earth's supposed curvature having to be calculated by using a formula should tell people it CANNOT be measured, which means it is NOT scientific. The scientific method is to measure, NOT calculate, mathematics CANNOT make bodies of water bend. Mathematics is a formal science, a language, a descriptor, and, like any language, can be manipulated to lie to suit a model. The spinning globe Earth is nothing but a mathematical concept which always offers an explanation of how things could be possible without any physical examples, and people should base their understanding of reality in physics, what can be demonstrated, what can be directly measured and shown.
He is also trying to use an intangible visual phenomena, perspective, the geometry of vision, as some sort of globe 'proof', and people do NOT look down at the ground when looking out to the horizon at their eye-level. People need to learn and fully understand how their eyes work with regards to perspective and horizons, parallel lines NEVER meet but perspective makes them 'appear' to meet at eye-level, therefore, you CANNOT use intangible visual phenomena as any sort of globe 'proof'.
He mentioned "sea-level' more than once, level means, at the same elevation, in a straight line, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanent convexity across their surface,. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will flow to seek its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Water does not tell lies, people do. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape.
The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum.
Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. If people cannot practically demonstrate their claims, then they are just lying, deceiving charlatans.
@@tonydixon635 I know it hurts almost more than you can bear, but hang in there Tony. You can get past this. I believe in you.
@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 You have just admitted that you know it hurts, therefore, you must be feeling whatever is hurting you, I am not feeling any hurt, lol. I am just happy exposing sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid trolls, such as you, for what you really are. You have NO PROOF, whatsoever, that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it rocketing aimlessly through a vacuum. That is because sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid trolls, such as you, CANNOT practically demonstrate any of your spinning globe Earth claims. All you have is language, reciting religious mantra. Your job as a paid troll is to deviate away from objective reality with tangible substance and blatantly lie and deceive by trying to use intangible lights in the sky or intangible visual phenomema, such as perspective, as some sort of spinning globe Earth 'proof'. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. Why do you 'believe' in nonsense you cannot practically demonstrate for yourself, you nutcase? You are just yet another sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll desperately wanting to keep their deceitful job. Go and find youself an honest job and make yourself an honest living. Hopefully, you have had all your jabs during the last two years, blatant deceiving liars, such as you, deserve all that comes your way.
If you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape.
The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum.
Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. YOU CANNOT practically demonstrate any of YOUR ridiculous spinning globe Earth claims because YOU ARE just a sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll, and shame on you.
Some flerfs here really have some hurt feeling from cognitive dissonance
Flatearth map reward now over $91M. Antarctica is optional. The challenge that makes fe'rs pee a little in their pants...
I love how they try to use cities in the distance as evidence but never mention the first 20-30 stories of the buildings are hidden by the horizon. Like when they use Chicago which looks like it’s floating on the water cause you can’t see any land or foundations.
That's because they are either trolling or have sever mental underdevelopment. It's sad really.
I know they lack decerment !!like when they show the run bull jump. The flat earthers don't realize thatnew Mexico is really is half the size of the earth. . I live on the ocean Atlantic Beach.the moisture above the ocean is like fine mist it will not let you see the ship go over the curve. Even if it was flat same thing. Please flat earther explain the size of new Mexico. 🙄
@@johntabuchi6831 someone left their pickle in the vinegar a little too long.
@@henrysteel4049 you just here to say, “that’s a lie,” or do you have anything to add or maybe disprove something? Simply saying, “that’s a lie,” or false or anything like that is not an argument and does not make you correct.
you clearly have no clue what range of sight is. or how your eyesight works. you see in a clone shaped in front of you. objects disappear from the bottom up. because that is how your eyes work. I love how you still believe the ship is going over the curve when scientists say you will never see it. the objects aren't going over a curve or disappearing due to a curve. they are disappearing due to the limits of your eyesight and atmospheric interferent. just like when scientists say refraction that is atmospheric interference towards your eyesight.
I cannot believe in this day and age we have to explain to people the earth isn't flat.
yeah, that's quite unbelievable some tards think we live on a pizza 🍕🤣🤣🤣
It s not normal to Ask question and Want to find answer by your own réflexion.
Some people are just Mindless idiots.
Sometimes I thank our fellow flat earther friends. Without them we probably won't have amazing channels like yours. I've learned so much from you.
ruclips.net/video/EtIfX2TJ_08/видео.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi
takes two sorts of people the ones who follow and the ones who lead not all people are bright are we globe tards
@dusmangi correct. Flat earthers are not that bright.
Also why is the second picture showing your version of a persons vantage point straight out but the first 1 you chabged from that and had it going down sharply?
Timestamps please
Flerfs love to prove earth curvature every time 😂
Globers are too ret@rded by cartoons to do it.
a curve cant stop curving right ?unless it curves back upward right?. think about that and follow that curve when you see the curve again....see where it ends...
@@stanlee4217 doesnt it just end where u stand? if u were to walk the entire globe in a straight line ull end up where u are because of the curve and gravity?
CURVATURE IS PRESENT (HORIZONTALLY SPEAKING), ON FLAT EARTH MODEL, LIKE THE CURVE SEEN ON A ROUND FLOOR MAT.
@@dougsdiagnostics6784 so now flat earthers are trying to prove earth is shaped like a round door mat? which verse in the bible does it say that?
I know flerfs are definitely stupid...I'm just here for the doggo
Can there be a photo of K2 taken from the Everest?
I love how your dog stared at you in the begining like "No... not this bullshit again..."
He is visibly done with flat earthers
It doesn't matter how well or how slowly you explain it for them they still stand there with their tongues out licking your windows.
LOL, what an awesome image! Thank you!
@@ShizukuSeiji Thank you, I do try.
I agree so please read this slowly as I prove beyond a shadow of doubt that Earth is indeed flat AF...
Ready?
Earth is made up of 70% non-carbonated water. Therefore, Earth is as flat as a soda pop left out for a week! (-:
@@ironwillie7666 *H*
I've got a T shirt which says...
""I can explain it to you BUT I can't understand it for you".
If the earth was flat, plate tectonics would change. Plates would follow the path of least resistance, in this case they would simply push towards the edge of the flat earth and simply fall off. That said tectonic pressures would thus be non existent thereby making both earthquakes and mountains impossible to exist a flat earth in the first place.
Flat Earthers have a hard time explaining volcaoes as well...
@chrisantoniou4366 Agreed. I was gonna mention volcano as well, but didn't.
No you don't get it the bedrock layer curls up around the perimeter and holds the dirt in
@@bacicinvatteneaca What? No ice wall? 😂😂😂
Fall off where exactly?
I understand paranoia, but I'll never understand flat heads.
I do admit, I used to have the ever so slightest idea in my head that the earth might actually be flat, somehow.
But then I saw their models...
If the earth is flat, then why can’t we use a powerful telescope to see Europe from the eastern coast of USA?
Flat earthers can’t answer that question. They might say it’s because of “atmospheric haze”, but even then we should still be able to see it, albeit very distorted.
If I was a flat earther, I would debate that you ant see it due to the curviture of water on a flat object... Water does not flat out completely, it curves. Put a drop of water on any flat surface... So because now you have this big blob of water between 2 flatish points, the water curve reduces visibility in a flat view line... But, thats only my answer if I were a flattie 😂
"Don't take away my ball!!!!!" 😭😭😭😭
You definitely would not be able to because how dense the atmosphere would be over thousands of miles. Telescopes work to be able to see the stars and moon because they are not looking through thousands of miles of dense air. This is basic!
@@flatcat4078 it certainly wouldn’t be clear but you’d still be able to make out at least something…
@mikecassell8953 Not at all. Just look at observations of objects from 20-50 miles out. They are completely distorted by the atmosphere and atmospheric lensing. And you are talking about thousands of miles not to mention the laws of perspective and vanishing point would make it impossible to see as object get smaller the farther they are away. Even if Mt Everest was on the shore of Europe, you would not be able to see it.
I've never understood why flerfs think we'd even see a horizon on a flat earth. In their pizza-world everything would just fade off into an obscure distance without any sharp horizon.
not sure how its possible but you've somehow made yourself seem dumber than FE-ers....
@@henkhenkste6076 Go back to your fever dreams. Those video titles are hysterical
Correct, on a flat Earth everything would fade away into the distance, OR, we would see the edge, there would be no horizon...
@@chrisantoniou4366 the horizon we see is apparent. Vanishing point. Laws of perspective. Higher you go the farther you see. That's why in a jet at 35k ft or on the beach at 6 it appears to be at the level of the observer. If it was physical as in a curve away edge it would stay fixed and not appear to rise. This is based in scientific fact. It's testable for anyone. Unfortunately indoctrinated people usually don't have the ability to think critically and would rather keep their false sense of superiority and lack the character to consider they've been manipulated. I find the reaction almost identical to highly religious people's reaction if you call them indoctrinated.
In their giant pancake we would easily see the big penguin-nasa-antarctic-treaty wall from the arctic and we could just use whatever to destroy it
What are the two mediums that cause the refraction within the said photo, also is refraction possible on a flat earth? if so how can refraction suggest curvature
Atmosphere is the medium, the changing density at different altitudes is what causes the refraction
The proof of curvature is in the fact that the mountain which should appear significantly taller, doesn't - because the Earth is dropping away more further away
So by this explanation refraction must change in severity day to day due to differences in atmospheric temperature/pressure (cold air being denser than hot air and so forth)
Yes it does, which is why views such as this photo only happen very occasionally
@@markstott5830
"So by this explanation refraction must change in severity day to day due to differences in atmospheric temperature/pressure (cold air being denser than hot air and so forth)"
exactly. if you read the photographers commentary on the photograph, they specify that they waited for specific atmospheric conditions.
Refraction is kind of like gravity The globetards use it as an excuse when they run out of all the other excuses just so they can be holding on to the ball before they would admit the reality of flat earth truth
When you said Guinness, you might have well said Nobel or Smithsonian.
Congrats.
No matter how far away a flerfer appears to be, their thickness always remains the same.
Thickness AND density! :D
This comment wins. Thanks for the laugh!
@@chrisantoniou4366 oh touche! Even better.
@@langdons2848 😊
@michael alderman So, apart from incredulity and ridicule, you have what?
this is the thing i find hilarious about Flerf's, they spend so much time trying to debunk the globe they don't bother to strengthen their flat earth model, because they know when they try they trip over themselves in comical fashion!
This is their biggest weakness. They have been trained to demand evidence for the globe, to deny all evidence offered, and to avoid any requests for evidence for the existence of their own fantasy. It's just like trying to reason with a 3 year old.
ruclips.net/video/sA7jbRojtCM/видео.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9
ruclips.net/video/EtIfX2TJ_08/видео.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi
I thought the dog was going to interrupt and joke “did you just say a RUFF guide?”
I live upside down in Australia in a magnetic flesh suit
only recently found your channel and just wanted to say thank you for all you're doing to prove how absurd the flat earth idea is whilst also making it very easy to understand the science that proves we're on a globe. you break everything down to nicely understandable chunks then put everything back together once it's been explained to show how it all works together, great stuff
Ditto, I can say the exact same. This channel is such a gem, and doesn't use conventional reasoning, but instead uses out of the box evidence, something I wouldn't even have imagined to look at, yet explains everything so well and precise, it's impossible to "debunk", unless you're a dubass flerf trying to shoot for the moon, which is obviously a fake at that point 🤣🤣🤣
I second that too! 👏
I agree although it’s hardly the first to achieve this and flat earthers continue to ignore any evidence that they’re wrong. Conversely by continuing to talk about them, it’s only prolonging their existence. Flat earth would have been extinguished from the start if people had of just done the sensible thing and just ignored them. But I guess the allure of laughing at the dumb dumbs out there is too strong.
Flat Earth seem to be like a cult to me now, they keep trying to prove the Earth is flat, they keep failing, but they still believe in that nonsense.
Agreed and well said.
Their biggest issues is the suns movement in the sky in southern Chile.
One should expect the sun to be unobservable most of the time, not matter if it is winter or summer, if the earth was flat.
Because if there is a distance where the sun disappears due to refraction or something then that distance has to shorter than the distance between between the sun and cape horn most of the day.
The sun should appear to move towards you in the sky then turn back north.
But the sun moves in an arc around you in the sky if you live in southern tip of Chile.
Similar to how the sun moves in the sky if you live in northern Europe.
And during summer, at around 46 degrees (South) longest day is somewhat 16 hours . That means the sun should be visible around 2/3 on that latitude at all the time. Flerfs will need pretty much luck to make that happen on flat earth with their local sun. 🤣
The flerfs are very northern hemisphere centric. They can’t explain why the moon appears upside down in the south, why different constellations are visible/invisible, or why the stars appear to rotate in a different direction.
The irony is that these are all observations they could make with their own eyes, if ever they could be bothered to leave their trailer park.
@@petrilaitinen4865
Not mentioning that the sun moves in a straight arch from east to west if you live on the equator.
If the earth was flat then you should be able to see that the sun is moving in a circle above you.
It should set north/west and rise in north east.
But it sets in the west and rises in the east.
As if the earth was spinning and the sun was still, or if the earth was still and the sun was orbiting the earth.
But not flat.
All they really care about is that the days are equally long for any place north of the equator.
Ignoring the entire southern hemisphere and how the sun moves in the sky.
The South Celestial Pole is another nail in the flerf coffin.
@@MegaBanne - Not to mention, if the Earth was flat then dawn would occur at pretty much the same time all over the world. As would sunset.
Why is the Black Swan image that flat earthers reference, so badly distorted compared to the other picture that is not.
I assume differing atmospheric conditions like higher humidity or something?
Excuse my curiosity/ignorance.
Yes. AIU it's mostly a large temperature gradient above the water.
Outside the box... all black swans can be found on the map of Earth all fe'rs use to find places. The same map is used to get all the distances. FE is indoctrination and all fe'rs are indoctrinated.
I wonder why Flat Earthers stopped talking about that photo lol
Remember guys, gotta lie to flerf.
Fight the flat earth.
'the sun isn't actually there'
oh it gets so much weirder than that. That 'true position' shown because refraction isn't even accurate, because it takes ten minutes for light from the sun to reach the earth.
Ontop of that, light is also bent slightly by gravity.
In extreme cases this allows you to see things like the back side of an accretion disk on a black hole, or the back sides of neutron stars.
(iirc, the movie interstellar was the first to do these light simulations. and becsuse it was so weird the team thought they broke the program!)
About 8.3 minutes.
Trying to learn......at what point (distance) does water start to (bend) or not be level? I use a "waterline" in construction so extremely curious at what point would this devise "not be accurate? please help, thank you
The sunset you don't actually see the sun on horizon. Mind-blowing. Everytime I see the sunset I'm going to remember that.
Thank you for blowing my mind WOW!
I did this one years ago.. one of the most simplistic and damning parts of that photo is that the photographer is looking down at the horizon..
Ok hipster *I DiD tHiS oNe YeArS aGo*… Yeah but he did it better and for a much bigger audience 😂
@@Jamesfrancosdog not a competition.. just an acknowledgement that FEs keep making the same claims.
@@slysparkane808 okay... so acknowledge how they sent a lazer beam across the Atlantic ? No one is helping you here, how did they ? No answer, I already know that because I've asked it a thousand times and you are so convinced Earth's round yet can't answer a simple bloody question. Astounding. The arrogance is simply amazing but we've seen a bit of that these last 3 years haven't we ?
@@deanhall6045
"sent a lazer beam across the Atlantic"
You would have to show me that, I am unaware of such a test.
"No one is helping you here"
I dont go looking for help. Not sure where you are going with that.
"No answer"
um.. How can I answer you while you are typing?
"I already know"
Cool!!.. show me this test.
"asked it a thousand times"
First I've heard of it..
"can't answer a simple bloody question"
again, I cannot answer a question while you are typing it.. and surely cannot answer a question about something I have not been made aware of.
"The arrogance is simply amazing but we've seen a bit of that these last 3 years haven't we?"
I've been analyzing FE claims for 7 years.. I have not been shown this claim once.
@@slysparkane808 look harder, they hide it for good reason. It is very, very real mate, you can be assured of that. You don't need to go looking for help because there isn't any on this, only a schoolboy feeding sharks, read the comments. I already know because you can't. Cheers.
they say perspective makes things disappear, but somehow they always disappear from the bottom to the top instead of just shrinking away in the distance.
They had to invent their own phenomena to try an explain how a flat earth might work - flerspective is one of the main ones. Flerspective is magic perspective where astronomical objects, like the sub and moon, don't change size as they move towards and away from us. It also means astronomical objects can magically get to the horizon, when in flat earth reality, they could never get near it. Finally you have already mentioned the compressing of the "bottom" of the sun/moon at the horizon. I am not sure any flerfer has ever tried to actually explain how that might actually be explained, or why only the sun and moon do it.
Rowbotham dismissed the change in elevation of Polaris as seen from different latitudes, as simply being perspective. One thng no flat earther has ever managed to explain is how those angles of elevation can be calculated in order to know what the observer's latitude is.
@@grahvis Thus his parrot Dubay spouts the same thing
I like to point out perspective is just a drawing tool. It cannot be used to calculate any thing. Other uses are just expressions
@@JohnSmith-ux3tt actually pretty much anything bigger than a certain size does it. Cargo ships, cities, mountains...
Holy mental gymnastics Batman
used this video to argue with a flat earther on tiktok comments that was telling me to check out that exact experiment lol
This video shows you how an ignorant person attempts to use circular reasoning to prove the globe! It didn't prove anything other than proving to all of us that he's a liar.
@@multispeciesangleryou seem to be missing the entire middle section where he demonstrates how this works on a flat earth and ...oh wait it doesn't look at all like reality. Oops.
@@5peciesunkn0wn na dude. You fell for some real simple stuff here. Oops.
@@multispeciesangler real simple stuff is reality. The sun crosses the horizon. That literally cannot happen on a flat earth. Oops.
I've made a couple of videos (in response to a certain Flat Earther's nonsense) regarding how easy it is to see evidence of the curvature from somewhere as innocuous as the English Channel. I live quite close to Folkestone & Dover, which from certain locations, it's possible to see the Cap Blanc Nez area of france and beyond. This is Usually around the Roundhill Tunnel area. However, from this location you can also see Folkestone seafront. If you were to travel to that location, France would no longer be visible as it had vanished below the horizon. It makes me chuckly that Flerfers will point atthese select few images, taken at specific locations, at specific times of the day, as evidence of their flat earth, but if we can see mountains from thousands of miles away, this shouild be a constant he world over. We can see this mountain from this other mountain, but can't see Bologne from Dungeness.
you should really upload them then maybe people will believe you.with this theory all the ships should not dissapear behind the horison, but magically float upwards....please send photo
@@stanlee4217 sadly these people while not stupid in themselves, believe stupid things, and are so far down their own particular rabbit hole that no amount of undeniable proof will bring them back from the brink. The videos are available on my channel, in amongst all the other random stuff I've got on there
And yet, when we see all the images of Earth from space, and everything is exactly where it should be on a curved section of the Earth's sphere, they scream "FAKE!".
Don't forget they literally tried to turn the black swan fallacy AROUND to claim ONE extraordinary image means all the normal ones no longer count. As if ONE "black Swan" proves White Swans are a fantasy... the opposite of what the analogy is actually saying (that you cannot exclude something for not existing as it will only take one proof to show it does exist, like one image of a black swan shows not ALL swans are white.)
@@Ugly_German_Truths Exactly! This is why when flat Earthers yell "Fake!" and "CGI!" with regard to photos and images of the Earth taken from space, I tell them that not only do they have to prove that the image they are responding to is fake, but that EVERY image and EVERY video ever taken showing the Earth's curvature is fake, but also faked in a such way to produce exactly the curve expected from a planet 12,742 km across. In this sort of debate, whether it's a "black swan" (lots here in Australia) or the Earth's curvature, any number of fake images are worthless if there is just one true image showing the Earth's curve.
I learned a new English phrase in this video! Instead of “As the crow flies”, we simply say “The bird path” in Sweden.
"As the crow flies" is used in the US, but it's a bit archaic sounding in the 21st century
And now we have learned a new Swedish Phrase, "The bird path". Thank you.
I first read "as the cow flies". I probably watched too much flatearther content today.
Fågelvägen! 😍
Love the light refraction examples because they can see it with their own eyes. The only evidence they will accept.
no flat earther "accepts evidence". they merely parrot off a script written by fraudsters to trick low-grade morons
Your sweet dog kills me 😂❤
I still can't believe this is a "debate" in godsdamned 2022.
It's a meme gone wild
Well, only in certain circles. There's a group of conspiracy myth believers who search for the most unlikely myth to believe in, where you have to ignore *everything that works* and all kinds of natural science and instead believe in complete nonsense (silly memes galore, but nothing useful). Those like to debate reality and call everyone a sheeple that does "believe" in Earth being a globe. Science denial to the extreme, and great fun to watch them come up with hilariously stupid "proofs" for their pancake world - or when they try to disprove the globe model and deny gravity. They even try to make everyone believe that geocentric vs. heliocentric model is about the shape of Earth, when it was only about which sphere goes around which other sphere - even educated people in the middle ages knew about Earth being a globe, even though they had their measurements (and thus sizes) wrong, and that led Columbus to travel to India the wrong way around. They ignore even that moment in history, even though the majority of flerfs lives in the USA. Many seem to also cling to some fundamentalist Christian beliefs with some crude literal biblical interpretations …
It isnt🤣
A debate would require that both sides have evidence.
It's a mass de bate
These people think that refraction is a buzzword, just like magnetism and buoyancy.
Yet they’ll use it whenever they need to in order to debate.
just like gravity and perspective!
@@stanlee4217 What calculation is used when you want to workout somethings buoyancy?
B = ρ × V × g 😉
@@stanlee4217, what's wrong with gravity? Your buzzwords buoyancy and density can't replace it. Perspective isn't what flat earthers thinl it is. They use flerfspective instead to fit their believes.
@@nikespits8728 To add to that, buoyancy uses gravity in it's formula. Flat earthers don't realize a helium balloon rises because the pull of gravity causes the air around balloon to be pulled down, forcing the balloon up. They also can't explain how having a difference in density creates a very specific vector of movement (why down specifically). Nor why two objects with different densities can still have the same acceleration if they have the same shape and volume.
such a responsible dog, helping to clean your laundry
13/10
I notice this all the time when sighting down lumber at work (to identify straightness). Particularly on sunny days there is a very distinct distorted lens effect in the air immediately surrounding the board, (extends out a couple mm or so). And if you look at an object past the end of the board, and shift the board up (down on your end) to slowly cover the object, it will disappear and then reappear quite distorted. (This has the benefit as an example of using actual air and being easily tested just incase some flatist wants to argue that examples using glass or water don't count...)
I'm not a Flerf myself, but let me see if I can provide a debunk for them. I think it goes something like...
Nuh uh. It's just your perspective. Things rise up to eye level. Uhhh... show me water sticking to a ball.
I think I've done it! Debunked! 🤣
That's more comprehensive than most debunks 🤣
I'd take them to a lake or sea shore and say: there. water sticking to a ball.
figure out how the eye and perspective works.. and you'll understand where you live..truths: water doesn't bend. it finds its level. the horison is always at eye level. doesn't matter how high you go. you can figure it out from there.
@@stanlee4217 Water finds it's level? Then what are the Huge bulges of water that we call "tides"?
If you Look at the horizon, then it's at your eye line.
Why doesn't the Sun and Moon change in angular size as they move past, like Airplanes do? We view all through the same medium, the air...
Why can't you see the base of the closest mountains? From the elevation of the photo, on a "Flat" Earth, you Should be able to...
@@stanlee4217 You needed to say "Ommm" after each shibboleth to have the required impact.
If the earth was flat, everyone on earth would be able to see the Burj Khalifa from anywhere on earth.
They would not, because of atmospheric haze. Visibility is never 100% in the atmosphere.
@@wiggles7976 Obviously assuming it's a clear day, and your not stood in side a building and all the other millions of reasons why you couldn't. Jeeeezzz!
@@Facts_Are_Facts_Are_Facts Even on the clearest of days, imperfect visibility is a thing. We can't really test it though, because on those very clear days, things tend to disappear behind the curve before they disappear into the haze. Earth gets in the way and the atmosphere is curved. I cannot see how you could predict what would happen on a flat earth, and we don't have a flat earth to test with.
@@wiggles7976 You see the part that says "IF"?
@@Facts_Are_Facts_Are_Facts Yes, "if" is the whole point of the discussion and that has not eluded me. How did you predict visibility vs distance on a flat earth?
The easiest experiment to debunk the horizon because their eyes cant see that far is that once the ship starts to disappear over the horizon, put them in a hor air ballon and lift them up, they should be able to see the boat again. But they still won't accept it...
We don’t live in a fish tank or a glass of water
Kind of sad that people have to explain the earth is not flat in 2022.
Another thing you should mention that helps prove Pic Gaspard is not simply lower than Grand Ferand due to perspective is that the vantage point that the picture was taken from is between the elevation of the two peaks. Perspective would cause the two peaks to move vertically closer together towards the vanishing point at eye level, but Pic Gaspard would never appear lower on a flat earth, even if it was millions of miles away.
might as well hold your breath, they don't understand how perspective works already as they use it to erroneously make their own claims. Trying to explain it to them just makes their heads implode.
@@Lorkanthal Exactly 😂
@@Lorkanthal Yes, "perspective" and "buoyancy" are examples of the incantations that they use as to stop an argument. I believe a rough translation from the FLERF is "Begone, demon!"
@@Lorkanthal And this is bad... HOW?
@@Lorkanthal No, saying that 8in/m2 = parabola would cause their heads to implode with the force of a nuke.
i love how whenever flat earthers claim you can see longer than you should, its still a bit below the curve
Earth has curvature and is obviously a sphere because nothing that big in space can be any other shape, at least in our observable universe. With that said however the flat Earthers could make their models much more convincing if they accounted for the curvature saying that and said it's mostly flat but still curves up at an odd angle. They can't swallow enough pride to do that.
You know, it is the simple fact that we know the shape of the earth has some curvature. While being stationary and flat.
Nevertheless I can recall a certain group of people who decided to come out with false an inaccurate information. Wild and bold predictions. This information was Unprovoked. Most importantly unproven without a reasonable doubt. All of a sudden the earth is a globe like they stumble across new found information.
Yea right 😂 must didn’t get the memo
If you guys wanted to play basketball 🏀 then just say that. #Triple OG.
@@3DGamer2B i could fucking destroy you in basketball tho, no cap
Wow, love the illustration with the glass of water and the fish tank!
We lost our 15 year old English Springer a few months back. Your videos simultaneously make me happy and sad. Please keep your doggo in all your videos.
Springers are the best, we lost ours a couple years ago they have a special place in your heart. Sorry for your loss.
Fish eye lense, CGI, cannot gat elevation angle from a curved adjacent, and unless you personnaly took the photo yourself, it's just not real. There you go, all Flat earth rebuttals at once.
It also means any photos they take aren’t valid either
You forgot 'Nuh uh".
Your demonstration of how light is bent using a glass of water was very descriptive. It would have been even better if you could have used a horizontal tube of water. Great explanation in any case.
You know that’s going to go over most people’s head. 😒
Excellent video and perfectly explained in a easy to understand way, many thanks👍🏻
THIS PAGE IS A PROPAGANDA OUTLET. The missing 8 inch per mile curve proves the earth is not a globe.
@@dfh658ok, keep taking the meds😂😂
@@darthja8292 THIS PAGE IS A PROPAGANDA OUTLET. The missing 8 inch per mile curve proves the earth is not a globe.
@@dfh658 so what is it then?
God could arrive in a flaming golden chariot pulled by Pegasus and say ‘The Earth is Round’ and Flerts wouldn’t believe it.
i mean i wouldn't.
the god part that is. Like who tf drugged me
Some of them probably would crucify Jesus, unless he was Supply Side Jesus.
You believe in a God? Just as bad as flat earthers
@@Pabz2030 go back to r/athiesm
@@Pabz2030 clearly you win ‘stupid reply of the year’…. You missed the whole point of my comment… God, golden flaming chariots and flying white unicorns….. unless you also believe that I believe in the last two…. Anyway, I digress. Try understanding something before having an opinion on it next time.
I love how you used math to prove your point. Flerfs would just say "That should not happen".
No Flerfs will say you're manipulating the numbers to fit your narrative while at the same time ignoring the science behind the manipulation.
Due to the Earth's supposed curvature having to be calculated by using a formula should tell people it CANNOT be measured, which means it is NOT scientific. The scientific method is to measure, NOT calculate, mathematics CANNOT make bodies of water bend. Mathematics is a formal science, a language, a descriptor, and, like any language, can be manipulated to lie to suit a model. The spinning globe Earth is nothing but a mathematical concept which always offers an explanation of how things could be possible without any physical examples, and people should base their understanding of reality in physics, what can be demonstrated, what can be directly measured and shown.
He is also trying to use an intangible visual phenomena, perspective, the geometry of vision, as some sort of globe 'proof', and people do NOT look down at the ground when looking out to the horizon at their eye-level. People need to learn and fully understand how their eyes work with regards to perspective and horizons, parallel lines NEVER meet but perspective makes them 'appear' to meet at eye-level, therefore, you CANNOT use intangible visual phenomena as any sort of globe 'proof'.
He mentioned "sea-level' more than once, level means, at the same elevation, in a straight line, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanent convexity across their surface,. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will flow to seek its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Water does not tell lies, people do. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape.
The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum.
Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. If people cannot practically demonstrate their claims, then they are just lying, deceiving charlatans.
@@tonydixon635 How does Radar "measure" the distance of airplanes at an airport?
Physically measure them, or by knowing the speed that the radar waves travel, to "calculate" the distance?
Flat Earthers rely on getting people to ignore reality, testing and evidence to Con you...
@@tonydixon635 you typed ALL that and you said nothing of importance. It's funny how you flerths always resort to "Practical Demonstration with tangible substance", but come up with some other stupid excuse when you are handed it. Not only that, but you are widely misrepresenting so many FACTS. It's not even worth trying to discuss this with flerths. We're all better off just calling you stupid and walking away, stupid.
@@vanbatim5906 I wrote how bodies of water behave, that said, how a body of water behave does not need explaining, it just demonstrates, the ability of water to always find its lowest level was here long before humans' ability to manipulate language and blatantly lie about it. Language CANNOT make bodies of water hold permanant convexity across their surface. The ability of water to always find its lowest level is NOT a 'conspiracy theory', it is a practically demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable SCIENTIFIC FACT AND OBJECTIVE REALITY WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE. Water does not tell lies, people do, YOU DO. The natural physics and behaviour of water, fluid mechanics, proves, beyond any doubt, the Earth is a DEMONSTRABLY level. The Earth is said to be over 70% covered in liquid, water, a tangible substance, and water always seeks equilibrium, level, at the same elevation, IN A STRAIGHT LINE, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanant convexity across their surface. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. Bodies of water HAVE to be contained, the water will take the shape of its container, but its surface will always find its level. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will always flow and find its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes YOU CLAIM vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of PROOF is on YOU to show a practical example of a pond, a lake or an ocean holding a permanent curve across their surface.
The burden of PROOF is on YOU to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape.
Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion.YOU CANNOT practically demonstrate any of YOUR ridiculous spinning globe Earth claims because YOU ARE just a sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending religious zealot.
How do you calculate refraction?
If you have not completed high school, then there would be no point in trying to explain it. Have you heard of "Wikipedia"?
@@stuartgray5877why be so rude if the guy is just making a question?
It requires several things: the density of the medium that light is traveling through and what it's coming from for starters. And to get that for the atmosphere you need to know the temperature, altitude, airpressure, and humidity at minimum because all those effect the air density.
i always employ Flat Earthers to pick my cherries. They are very good at it.
Need to build up funding to gather all the flat earthers and have them take a trek across Antarctica
i dont think that would work, since there is no other side and they would just end up at the ocean again and you bet they would think they walked in a circle. we should shoot them into space instead
Wolfie 6020 has offered to fly any prominent flat Earther over Antarctica. No takers so far. They know the truth but they want to keep selling their DVDs and t-shirts.
ruclips.net/video/sA7jbRojtCM/видео.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9
That's exactly what they're asking for. Let them onto Antarctica but they wont
Not allowed onto Antarctica except to see the penguins
You forget that most claiming they believe that Earth is flat also don't understand how Earth's atmospheric pressure gradient works. More importantly, how it works in conjunction with the downward force that is present due to gravity.
ruclips.net/video/sA7jbRojtCM/видео.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9
ruclips.net/video/EtIfX2TJ_08/видео.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi
How tall is one's person?
Great video, but just a heads up. I believe the ray tracing illustration at 3:52 is wrong. The rays should cross and form a mirror image on the bottom. It's easy to see that the rays are being refracted in the opposite direction on the bottom lenses.
Nice. This is what I needed. I've seen this used as evidence and it did make me doubt the globe a little bit. I tried asking for an explanation under Professor Dave explains youtube channel for example and all they do there is just laugh instead of provide a reasonable answer. This makes sense. Thanks for clarifying
you could actually just go to the website of the photographer where he explains it.
Never let Flerfs get into your head. They could end up trying to break down your beliefs by claiming well know concepts and stuff are false.
Science is science for a reason. We don't just have millions of dollars wasted into making people believe in an elaborate false reality, which is what they're making it out to be.
If you wanna know more about a globe earth, or to lighten your mood, go look at astronomy videos. Videos on Magnetars, Pulsars, Blackholes. I recently learned Blackhole Stars used to exist!
Besides, Flerfs say to "do your own research" but then others use government documents to prove the earth is flat.
‘Professor Dave’ has explained, debated, and proven to the point of exhaustion, from every level of complexity. You are just …dumb.
ruclips.net/video/EtIfX2TJ_08/видео.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi
But the fool on the hill
sees the sun going down,
And the eyes in his head
See the world spinning 'round.
Globe confirmed 🌎👍
Good morning everyone. Here for my daily request...
PLEASE SHOW ME THE ROUTE THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO THE ICE WALL ON THE MAP EVERYONE USES FOR TURN BY TURN DIRECTIONS TO THE NEAREST AIRPORT.
Easy way to kick their argument into touch is to take a photograph from the same location when there is minimal refraction I will accept your claim that the earth is flat when you can explain to me where the mountain has disappeared to.
You can lead a flerf to an education. You can't make them think, learn or change their mind.
Great work Dave, can you please give links to the original photo and the various calculators you used. Thanks very much.
The one at 6:00 appears to be this:
Walter Bislin's Blog-En
Advanced Earth Curvature Calculator
Friday, August 31, 2018 - 17:54 | Author: wabis {... and URL that YT doesn't let me post}.
@@rhetoricalquestion6009 Thanks for your help. I hope Dave will post in the video info section.
Love the video but once you talked to the dog, I could only focus on the dog.
Ive seen the curvature of the earth, in Iraq we had to fly out well over 50,000+ ft above sea level because we were in a war zone. This afforded me the opportunity to see the curvature of earth with my own two eyes. I’ll never forget that.
No .
Did it curve around and have country's full of buildings facing at right angles and every angle inc' upside down if you zoomed in from outer space and filmed all uk , usa, china, australia etc all at opposing angles ?
but when you skype uk to usa and to australia all are same way up always at the same time ?
explain please ?
@@stefan2005stefangravity.
That must've been one hell of an experience!
@@stefan2005stefan What the hell are you even on about, it's almost like you don't seem to understand how big the earth is and how high 55000ft is.
Your dog is waaaay more interesting than the flat earthers opinion🤣
So a flat earther used altitude to see farther away beyond the Earth's horizon at ground level to prove the Earth is flat. Got it.
Where can I find curved water experiment or duplication?
Put a drop of water onto a table. Curved water. Well done.
Doesn't object that a drop of water put on have to be curved to simulate a "round spinning ball"? Drop on table simulates flat earth.
@@Isusasaves drop on table turns back into a curved surface after a few moments. The rim of a cup when filled to the brim shows curved water. A wet ball shows curved water. A spirit level shows curved water around the bubble. A kugel fountain shows water sticking to a ball spinning many times faster than the Earth's 1 full rotation per day.
If that holds, why cant i see England when im photographing a sunset on Danmarks West coast ?