If I Could Only Keep One Lens
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- Check This Lens Out!
geni.us/sX6ImBU
📸 Check Out My “Digital Film” Preset Pack! (Save Yourself Hours In Editing!)
geni.us/5yBpVk
🎛️ My Favourite Rec709 Conversion LUT for V-Log
geni.us/wfmNUG0
🎵 Best Royalty Free Music
www.epidemicso...
THE GEAR I USE:
*Some of the following links are affiliate links, so if you decide to purchase something, I get a very small commission at NO extra cost to you - Thanks in advance for supporting the channel!
CAMERAS:
My Main Cam (Lumix S5IIX)
geni.us/VHW0Kv
My B-Cam (Lumix S5II)
geni.us/Avt5
PRIME LENSES:
Panasonic LUMIX 18mm F1.8
geni.us/qcoUzw
Panasonic LUMIX 24mm F1.8
geni.us/AdbkotR
Panasonic LUMIX 35mm F1.8
geni.us/j0l5fn
Panasonic LUMIX 85mm F1.8
geni.us/mZm1TkS
ZOOM LENSES:
Sigma 28-70 F2.8
geni.us/Bd6NL
Panasonic LUMIX 16-35 F4
geni.us/oTkQR
Panasonic LUMIX 70-200 F4
geni.us/RBByZLM
AUDIO SETUP:
RODE Wireless Pro
geni.us/58qqXd
#lmount #onelens 
Кино
I want to know what lenses you own and use currently! Talk to me 👀
Lumix 24-70mm f2.8 S Pro Lens / 16-35mm F4 S Pro / 70-200 S Pro / 35mm S Lens / some tt artisan 50mm / vintage glass Canon.
Lumix 35// 50 //85 /// 24-105 // 70-300
Sigma 28-70 // 16-28
My first lens was also the 24-105 but I always preferred the soft image from sigma lenses.
Planning to get the sigma 28-105 and might sell the Lumix 24-105
All L mount lens, 50mm 1.8 , 20-60mm an the 35mm 1.8. 35mm is what I use the most its my fav FL.
My first analogue SLR Lenses in 1979 was 28mm, 45mm and 135mm, not really my own choice, but that was what I was adviced to get, later I got a 35mm, a 90mm Macro and MANY more Lenses...
Now I have some of my old analogue Lenses and my new Lenses which I use are Sony 14mm 1.8 GM, Zeiss Loxia Distagon 21mm T*, Sony 24mm 1.4 GM, Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 35mm 2.0, Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar 35mm 2.8 ZA, Voigtländer Nokton 50mm 1.0 Aspherical, Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8 T* ZA, Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 65mm 2.0 Aspherical, Zeiss Batis Sonnar 85mm 1.8 T*, Sony 85mm 1.4 GM II, Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 110mm 2.5, Sony 135mm 1.8 GM and Sigma 500mm 5.6 DG DN Sports.
If I had to keep only one Lens it would maybe be my 65mm Macro Lens, which is very versatile and good for many kinds of photography.
lumix 24-105!! I love it
24-85 f/2 is the dream that never seems to come
That would be my do it all lens for sure, but I think it would come at a price… it’d be huge!
I started on the same lens, the 24-105/4, and loved it, but eventually needed something faster and wider, so ended selling it and buying 2 more lenses with the money.
Great video as always
What two lenses did you buy? Thanks for watching mate!
Just got the s5iix with this lens as well as the 14-24mm f2.8. I feel like with these 2, it'll cover all my bases especially with the new firmware that was released.
Voigtlander 35mm F1.4 M-mount. Together with Light Lens Lab M to L Mount on my Lumix S9
@@paulmacurry ahh gorgeous! I should really adapt some more M mount glass to the S9, that’s a great idea :)
My first L mount purchase was the Sigma 85mm f1.4 for my weddingy portrait goodness 😍 I've since swapped to the Lumix 1.8 as its miles smaller and lighter
is the weight difference really negligible compared to the lumix 85mm with image quality? wanting to add an 85mm and really contemplating on which one to get.
Sigma Art 85 1.4 was also my first purchase (alongside the Sigma Art 20 1.4 for Astro work). Although it is a big and heavy lens, it creates beautiful pictures. It seems everyone becomes so attractive when photographed with this lens. There is something about it, its sharp as it gets and at the same time smooth. Don't know how they've done it.
@@MicroFourNerds The Lumix 85mm makes my bag lighter and therefore my lazy ass happier , but the Sigma 85 is just GORGEOUS!
my first lens was a prome manual tt.artisans 25mm f/1.4 for my e-mounted sony apsc body; because i wanted something for low light performance to shoot auroras and maybe have a decent lens for night time vlogs.
Cons: my body doesn’t have sensor stabilization or does the lens so maybe next i am willing to look out for a gimbal
I tested it few minutes at the Paris Photo fair last year and yeah I fully agree with you Josh.
Does it have OIS I don’t remember
is it optically better than art 24-70?
Looks like a great lens however I picked up a 2nd hand 24-105 a few months ago (partly based on the great reviews you have done for it) as my do everything lens on run and gun type shoots and I love it. The only downside is the F4 max aperture however I've found with the zoom compression and the great ISO performance of the S5II it's not an issue and on a few shots I've had to close down to F5.6 - 8 as the DOF was too shallow. It would be nice to have the 2.8 but it's definitely workable. On the upside is the slighter wider FOV which has come in handing at conferences in smaller rooms and the big bonus was price difference. I got my lens 2nd hand in as new condition for $950 AUS which is about $480 GBP but even brand new it works out about $600 GBP cheaper than the Sigma 28-105.
It’s definitely a brilliant lens and at times I miss having it to be honest. The compression at 105 even at f4 was more than enough for me, I’ve never really been that fussed about the blurriest background possible like some people are.
If they made a 2.8 version that still has OIS that would be insane! Glad you’re enjoying it :)
@@JoshCameron Yep, loving it. I used it on a photo shoot the other day with the recently added hybrid zoom function and it was awesome.
I didn't know you sold your 24-105 but I suppose it wouldn't make sense to have the 24-105 and the 28-105.
I'm not into super blurry backgrounds either at least not for 90% of what I shoot. I like some separation of course but I still like to be able to identify the environment my subject is in 🙂
Hi, my first lumix lens is lumix s 50mm f1.8.
Lovely lens, the first of the 1.8 primes to be released and it really set the tone for the set :)
I struggle to choose my next lens, I am thinking about a zoom lumix s pro 16-35 f4 or sigma 24-70mm f2.8. I am doing primary travel and street photography (limited portrate)but also some RUclips videos and intent in the future to make some short films. Which one would you recommend in my case.
@JoshCameron thank you for your reply
I also started out with the 24-105! I wanted a versatile zoom, and I was able to get it for only $480 used. That's still the lens I use most of the time, and I am quite envious of that wide f2.8 aperture on the 28-105. Although, for my own use, I think I actually prefer the 24-105, as it has that excellent image stabilization, and the extra 4mm on the wide end is pretty helpful for my shooting as I'm often not able to step further away from my subject (I film bands at house shows with very dense crowds).
I'm not sure why there aren't more lenses available for L mount with image stabilization. Combined with the stabilization on Lumix bodies, the footage looks absolutely incredible, and I don't feel any need to use a gimbal.
Thank you, as always, for the excellent video! (:
I agree regarding OIS, it would be great to see more options out there utilising it. Paired with the Lumix IBIS , I was able to get incredibly smooth shots and rarely used a gimbal!
If they made a 24-105 F2.8 I’d be all over it, especially if it had OIS too.
Thanks for reaching out :)
I have this lens and love it. It's so good for run and gun shoots and I've found no fault with it so far, and I purchased it on the day of release so I've been shooting with i for a while!
Ive been really fortunate with my S5ii, as I bought it on a deal that came with a Lumix S 50mm F/1.8 for free alongside the kit lens (and as of now, it's still my favorite single lens to use).
As far as my first lens purchase goes, I was actually able to buy two lenses at the same time through a special discount provided to me. So among the options, I decided to pick up the Lumix S 28-200mm F/4-7.1 for it's versatility, as well as the Lumix S 100mm f/2.8 for portraits and macro.
I'm really happy with the selection of lenses that I have at the moment; but if I had to restrict myself to just one, I think I'd pick the 28-200mm for it's versatility, even if it is a bit slow.
I agree. The 28-200 is the reason I decided to add a FF camera to my GH6 and GH7. I also got a great deal last Black Friday at B&H on my S6iiX-$2197 with 20-60 and 85 1.8 +128GB Lexar SD. Also bought the 28-200 at the same time at $100 off all tax-free. ($300 savings) I am super happy with all three of these lenses, but I agree, if I had to live with just one it would be the 28-200. What an incredible and yet small lens this is. I love it.
That's amazing Josh! I'm still rocking the 24-105 Lumix and its weight, Lens IS and quality of output really makes it the only Zoom lens I take to most of my shoots, along with the 50 1.8 and 85 1.8 primes. It's a simple setup, but gets the job done. I might pick up the 18 mm and 35 mm S primes at some point, but honestly, the 3 lens setup serves for most of what I need. Just waiting for a drop in S5II X cost to upgrade from my trusty S1 :)
Man, that 4mm's on the wide end is tough to give up. I can't help but think they'd have a real winner with this one if it were 24-105mm f2.8. It's already a big lens so it needing to be a little bigger to reach 24mm doesn't seem like a deal breaker in overall design. I guess I'm old fashioned but I just can't live with a "one-lens" setup that doesn't at least go to 24mm.
I'm not sure this counts, but when I bought my original EOS550D, I bought the kit with the 15-85 mm lens. The standard kit was 18-55 or the 18-135 or the 18-200.
But getting the best "kit" image quality, you had to go up to the most expensive kit, the 15-85. So since that was an active choice that I wanted over the horrible 18-55, I am gonna say that was my first lens I actually bought.
I complimented this later with a 70-300.
I have the 24-105mm lens and 70-30mm lens. The 24-105mm is my most used lens. I find the dual stabilisation available with the LUMIX lenses valuable so would miss having that with the Sigma 28-105mm lens.
That’s the thing I miss most about the 24-105… the Dual IS is game changing !
24-105mm Panasonic was my first. Have since traded it for a 28-70mm Sigma but do miss some of the range while also enjoy being able to use it more easily with a gimbal. Have definitely thought about the Panasonic 28-200mm and now the Sigma 28-105mm, but wouldn't get rid of the 28-70mm
The 28-70 answered a lot of my problems when I first got it, and I still use it a lot to this day. I love how lightweight it is and the quality is also really good as well. Granted it’s not the sharpest lens I own, but I totally agree RE using it on a gimbal etc :)
First lens was a 24-105. Great for traveling. Still using it plus the 50 mm and the 70-200 f4.
Lumix 20-60 f/3.5-5.6, 50mm f1.8. Both came together with my camera. Have been looking at the 24-70 f2.8, but I'm leaning more towards buying the 24-105 f4 & 16-35 f4 pro lens.
You say it’s heavy? But it’s nearly same weight as the LUMIX 24-70 2.8 or 70-200 2.8. It’s also cheaper than either of those PRO options. Also, its closest true competitor from Canon is almost 1lb heavier.
Great video as always Josh, thanks for sharing! I've been eyeing this beast for a while now, and if it weren't for the fact that it extends when zooming (which I find very anoying) and me already having the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro I probably would've bought it already. Now instead I'm torn between this and the 24-70 II to replace my plethora of primes. The size and weight of the 28-105 doesn't really bother me as much to be honest. Cheers
My first and favorite was the Pana 16-35 f/4, and is now in balance with my almost new favorite, more versatile Sigma 24-70 f/2.8. Perhaps one day I will replace the 16-35 by the Sigma 14-24 f/2.8.
My first lenses after my kit lens was sony 16-35 f4 and 90mm macro. Both are used all the time for underwater photography. If I had to keep just one I think it would be the 16-35mm lens. Now when we are talking about top side lenses. I have a Tamron 35-150 f2 - 2.8. This is a great all in one lens for photoshoots and walking around. it is large, heavy and expensive but wat a beautiful lens. It just doesn't fit in an underwater housing for the majority of my photography...
I’d absolutely love to give underwater photography a try. I’m sure it’s an entirely different skill set compared to “land photography” , but I’ve seen some incredible pics from people who do that professionally :) would love to see some of your work!
My first lens purchase was the Sigma Art 18-35mm to go with my 70d. What a good combo. It' continued on when I started using the Sony FS5, but i sold it when I started moving to full frame. It's auto focus was too loud, but I do sit back and think about how well it would have paired with the fx30 sometimes. I main a s5 ii but kind of want an fx30 as a second cam for cheaper lens choices.
The first lens I purchased in 1968, for my Leica IIIf (not including the 50mm F/2.8 Elmar, which came with the camera), was a 35mm F/3.5 Elmar.
It was the cheapest & most usable wide angle option for the rangefinder Leica LTM mount camera.
Since then the 35mm has become the first lens I've purchased after changing camera systems. I've changed systems too many times to mention over the intervening years.
This focal length has invariably been my go to lens, and over the years, I've usually preferred the F/1.7 to F/2 aperture variants, except where an F/2.8 compact/pancake option was available.
Of course for convenience, I'll take a lightweight "kit" (Lumix S 20-60mm, anybody?), but in most circumstances I find using a prime lens far more satisfying!
I keep my Sigma 50mm f1.2 DG DN and my S5II. This is a dream set. I startet photography 35 years ago with a Minolta XG9 and a Rokkor 50mm 1.4. And in this way, start and end with 50mm - is allright.
My first L series lens that wasn't the 24-105 kit was the 50mm 1.4. I was shooting a lot of dark spaces and the 1.4 made sense for my career at the time, but since I've bought other lenses including the 24-70 2.8, it usually sits locked up in my office. I think that sometimes 50mm is just a bit too deep for what I generally do if my shoot is indoors. Honestly, 40mm would probably be perfect for most of my stuff these days.
The first lens I bought (having already stock Lumix 20-60) was the Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG DN L-mount. It was one of the best lenses on the market at the time, as the list of L-alliance lenses in general was quite short.
I own the Lumix 35mm, 24mm, 50mm and 85mm and my favorite out of the bunch is the 85mm. I havent tried the 50mm 1.4 S Pro but heard only great things about that lens
With my Lumix S9 the Sigma 35 F2, with my GFX 100S the 55 1.7. To be honest, I hate changing the lenses. As a result, I am moving more to get the right composition. Makes me more creative.
My first lens purchase was the Lumix G 25mm 1.8 for my first Camera (Lumix G81). So like a 50mm equivalent :D
First lens I bought was a 85mm. I really like the look and even now with a 35mm, 58mm, and 20-60mm I will always fall back to the 85 because of that compressed look.
Sigma 28-105 f.28 is my new favorite! Planning on keeping it even if i get nice primes down the road -markimus
My first lens I bought was Sony 18-105mm F4. It was my first and only lens for 5 years, then I bought Sigma 30mm f1.4
Haha! I used to own the 18-105 when it shot with Sony back in the day! I think that was one of my first lenses for the E-Mount too :)
First l mount purchase was the 28-70 from sigma. GOATED lens but I have moved on to the better 24-70 Panasonic
I have the sigma 105 dg dn macro which I will sell now for either this lens or 50mm f1.2 solely for food photography , which one would you choose Josh ?
Personally I’d choose the 28-105. It’s way more versatile and while I love the 50mm F1.2, I’d feel quite limited if that was my only focal length!
@ cheers josh - if you could use only one lens for food. Would it still be the new sigma 28-105 ? Or would you choose differently any budget ?
35 mm 1.8 l mount was my first purchase, Its my fav focal length, even if I use a zoom lens most of my footage is shot using 35mm.
Figured it might have been the Samyang 35-150 f/2-2.8. VERY flexible lens.
You forgot to mention, that with the new Hybrid Zoom and Crop Zoom, you get even more range out of this lens. ❤
I'm currently on the little brother of that, the Sigma 28-70 F2.8. With the Hybrid Zoom, that gives me 28-109 for 4K Video.
The hybrid zoom feature is incredible! I love it :) I love to shoot in 6K open gate though for different deliveries (vertical and 16x9) so unfortunately I wouldn’t be able to use it on shoots unless I was willing to use 4K !
Great video mate. Would definitely be a 24-70 f2.8 if I could only have one lens. Sigma or Lumix I ain't fussy! 😊
@@ScottEdwards love that! As long as it gets the job done !
Sigma Art 35mm f1.4 was my first, but then opted for the 35mm i-Series f2.0, for size and weight
My first lens was the Lumix S 35mm. I bought it in a kit with the S5II as my entry into photography. I chose the 35 because I read online that 35mm is something of a favorite focal length. Unfortunately, this lens taught me that I HATE 35mm. I understand its versatility, but I find the focal length counterintuitive to the way that I view the world. This isn't really a fault of the lens, though. It performs well, now that I am better able to understand it.
35mm is a lovely focal length but I can totally understand where you’re coming from. I only really started to appreciate 35mm primes after a couple years of making content, but if I had one at the very start I’d have probably felt like I was in “no man’s land” a bit
Great lens! But man... get your hands on the Samyang 35-150 if you can... it's become one of my all time favourite lenses.
I’d love to, I’ve heard good things about it!
I like the 28-200 + 18-40 and have some primes (24, 45, 85 and 100 Macro) and with the S9 you can easily travel with one bag and all of these. I can even get the S5 get into my shoulder bag. I like those 200-300g lenses - carry four of them instead of one giant lens and atill having the 18-200mm range or even more for video.
FUJINON 23mm F2 WR because of the build and image quality.
First purchased lens was in 2007 - nikkor 50mm f1.8 manual.
My first ever lens was a 35mm 1.4. I still use it to this day thanks to Sigma’s EF to L-Mount
Ah nice! So were you using canon before Lumix? :)
I am afraid the with the hybrid zoom of the last Lumix FF cameras these telephoto zoom lenses are a bit obsolete in terms of size and weight... 😢
I'm just commenting because I'm curious as to what people would replay to that.
The first lens I bought was the 24mm because I wanted to go wide with a large aperture. If I would choose a single lens it would be the Lumix 24-105 or Sigma 28-105 because I want to go relatively wide but still be able to zoom a lot.
First lens i bought was a $160 500mm f6.3 lens off facebook lol, ive gotten some of my fav shots with it, but now its time to get better glass and truly invest
500mm as a first lens is so interesting! I love that! Hahaha when you use a wide lens it must feel super weird for you now 😂
24-70 2.8 you can always zoom in a bit afterwards, but never get more wideangle than recorded...👌
Thanks for the video! How is the Sigma 28-100 better than Lumix 28-200, outside of size?
The Sigma 28-105 is constant f/2.8 aperture whereas the Lumix 28-200 is variable f/4-7.1, so the Sigma will be better in low light, but the Lumix is a lot smaller and lighter.
For a professional getting the job done, it’s a great choice. But for the average travel/hobbyist it’s much too big and would get left behind often. I really hope Panasonic updates the 24-105 f4 soon.
Been considering this lately! I mainly shoot video! How would you compare this video quality wise to the Lumix 24-70 s pro?
@@stuart0040 They’re very similar in terms of sharpness, although I would give the edge to the Lumix S Pro. That being said, I love the extra reach that the Sigma gives you :) the difference in sharpness is negligible though unless you’re a proper pixel peeper, and no client has ever zoomed in on an image of mine and complained 🤣
I can't argue with that choice at all. Pair it with hybrid zoom and the Sigma 16-28 and you have everything you'd need. Unless you absolutely need f1.8 (I can live without that for most scenarios). Have you ever noticed a difference in stabilization b/w Sigma and Lumix lenses (not counting the 24-105)? I know the AF is pretty comparable but Ive heard some people say the Sigma lenses have an odd wobble when it comes to stabilization.
first lens bought was canon 50m. how dose this lens compare to sigma art 24-70 f2.8 canon IS?
Sigma art is much sharper and more versatile. Keep the 50mm around for its f1.8 at times
@ great. Apologies I mean how dose sigma art zoom compare to this other lens featured in video?
MY 1st purchased lens was the Panasonic 50MM for my Panasonic S5M2 because I seen a photographer in NYC using one to take pictures of random people on the street and I asked him to see the photos which he showed me... the Panasonic S 50 MM was just a bit too expensive for me so I caught the 50MM on sale.
why not the Samyang 35-150mm F2-2.8???? this is very versatile
I’ve never tried it :)
@@JoshCameron maybe its the topic for the next video
😉😉
This content is informative. Thank you.
Nikkor 80-200. Shooting weddings and portraits, was my first. 😅
Josh, i think people is fed up with native len content. It would be nice if u make a videk about adapting ef len to the lumix s9, cheap len like canon 24 85, 28 105, ef tamron len which is affordable. It would be interesting
The first lens I bought for the L mount was the Leica APO SUMMICRON 90mm
That’s a very boujee first lens!
@ yes indeed 😂
In real the very first was the TL18mm when I entered into the L mount alliance with the TL2
Then when I purchased the S1R there were the 24-105 and the 50 f/1.4 as a kit but I sold both when I purchased the APO 90mm
This lens is that good that I sold all my Nikon gear.
Later I came back to Nikon for AF accuracy reason…
But now with the last firmware update on my S5iiiX I feel more and more confident AF Wise
wrt lens
I currently own the
Sigma 14-24 F2.8
Lumix 24-70 F2.8
Lumix 26mm F8
Lumix 35mm F1.8
Lumix 50mm F1.4
Sigma 85mm F1.4
For me it’s the sigma 24-70, that thing just lives on my camera
Im the same, great lense 😎👌
Man I just picked up a 70-300 for 500 bucks! But if I need that 2.8 I’ll definitely consider that lens
That’s a steal! I love the 70-300 :)
I love the 85mm and use also the recent 28-200mm a lot !
Sigma 24-70 for me, no questions.
I don‘t get it Josh... The Sigmas‘ only advantage is the 1 stop more light and maybe a little smoother background blur. The Panasonic starts at 24mm, costs less, is much lighter and smaller and has built-in stabilization. You can‘t be serious in prefering the Sigma…
to my understand, it is a bit more about what's the prefer f stop for a working professional, sometimes f4 really limit you, then you have to change the lens, but f2.8 lenses have already been around for quite sometime, so practically it is a better aperture set for working in a lot of environment. Of course nowadays the camera become better in high iso, but 300gram weight with all way to f2.8, that's a choice can be made.
Otherwise your argument can also go to 24-70/2.8 vs 24-105, 24-105 shall be no brainer, which in real world it won't be.
24mm might be important for some people, but it depends on the person, and for video work, you can always use camera movement, so it can be compensated, and to me, 20mm is a proper wide angle if I want to have some gimbal dramatic movement, if not, 24 and 28 won't make a big difference.
And again, Josh here are talking about one lens to do it all, so if f4, he will deal with low light and high iso noise, and if he prefer 70-105mm end, rather than 24-28mm, what's wrong with his choice.
What @chennyye28 said!
thanks~
You prefer this over the 35-150?
Wish i could trade my 24-105 for this lens. I don't use 24mm a ton so the 28-105 might be perfect.
first lens was 28-70 f2.8 Sigma. It produced some great images, but the video was awful in my (beginner) experience. the video was warpy and weird. I now switched over to a prime 24-105 and I love the optics on it and my videos are coming out so good now!!
That’s interesting you had issues with the video, by warpy are you referring to corner wobbles etc? That would be down to the IBIS and moving the camera too much handheld I’d have thought. Glad you’re enjoying the 24-105 now though, it’s a fantastic lens for both photo and video :D
@@JoshCameron yes the corner wobbles! i didnt have it on a gimbal, I always used it handheld and the wobbles ruined videos for me. the 24-105 is the TRUTH!
Great comparison video will be sigma 28-105mm vs Samyang 35-150mm 😄👍🏼
It would be! If I can get my hands on the 35-150…
Me tooo, It s best lens
If I had to keep only one Lens it would maybe be my 65mm Macro Lens, which is very versatile and good for many kinds of photography.
Awesome! 65mm is an interesting focal length, I can see that being super useful :)
I would keep my anamorphic, I love this lens so much.
Sirui 50mm x1.6
You interested me with this my friend
Started off with the sigma 16-28 bc I thought I was gonna do a bunch of real estate
This lens and also the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 have a terrible error: in video or photos, when you zoom in or out with autofocus to an still object, it start a horrible focus hunting. That's why I sold it.
Have you met the Samyang 35-150mm F2-2.8?
Can you do some street photography pls
I’d love to :)
My first lens? Ummm... That was long ago... Perhaps a Tamron 28-200... That ancient one, in 2005... As for now, 20 years later, if I have to keep one lens it will be Olympus 12-100/4 Pro. I am using now MFT... Before MFT I use L mount and I had 24-105/4, and I did not like it actually - extremely bad contra light handling, heavy. I actually enjoyed L mount 20-60 more. But I wen to MUCH more comfortable MFT Pro lenses and I am still very happy with that decision.
MFT has so many upsides that people sometimes forget about. I think that sounds great, and if it works better for you then that’s brilliant! The weight and size of FF is ultimately a big downfall if you do prefer a more compact setup
My one lens would be a 28 f/2.8
Keeping it wide! I like it :)
14-150 Olympus is better than you would expect
20-60 because that was the only thing with s5
that's my first lens. my only lens I would have is 16-28 sigma 2.8
But what was the first lens you bought separately out of a kit??
Samyang 35-150mm F2.0-2.8 is the one i own and is superior to all the lenses that's currently available
It’s definitely versatile!
Rokinon 35-150
I’ve never tried it :)
Is your name Josh Cameron because you have the Camera On?
😂😂
How can every video be new and light striking? People are not even paying anything to watch his video. There’s no point in saying: I’m unsubscribing because %#%#.
If something doesn’t give you bundle of joy or full of enlightenment. Just say it plain and simple way. “Wish your vid had more of (something)”
isn’t that easy…???
Would you say such things to an owner of the restaurant, face to face, things like “I will not visit here ever again, because (something) isn’t quite my taste”??
You would get a decent punch instead of kind online reply.
I don’t understand why people try to push youtubers (once they liked) around.
Maybe it could be a cultural thing but still..
28-200
Hell yeah, great lens
First! 😉
🫶🏼
Bro makes the same video with different titles… bout to unsubscribe tbh
Then just do it. I don’t see your youtube channel l. At least, bro’s putting out content!
It’s up to you whether you want to consume it or not, just stop complaining! Lol
That’s what his channel is about 😂 .. ✌🏼 Adios
It's honestly the reason why this ytuber will never break the 100k subs, let alone the 50k subs... so many better people doing what he does in a WAAAAY better manner. I've been saying this for years but Josh can't seem to find his identity. He just makes these bland videos and that's it, no real input
@@Samiam-mu5ln you sound like a hater.
@Shalin.S.Shah.
Making second accounts just to attack people is tragic, get a life.