This might be the perfect do-everything car. I'm amazed the RAV4 sells so well when it feels like a tin can inside and handles like a bowl of jelly. I literally felt unsafe driving my sister's RAV4 because the steering was uncomfortably uncommunicative, and the throttle and brakes were ridiculously spongy. This tried-and-true, extremely efficient powertrain, combined with Mazda's expertise in interior design, handling, and NVH mitigation makes this a much better option if you're not just looking for another soulless appliance on wheels.
@@davidglad yea I think it will sell well and I guess it would be a better and more practical choice than getting the turbo version but hybrids are really also frugal shoppers so would they just be better off with a regular NA Mazda? Idk
@@sachinnair91 for sure my friend! I think this will be desirable but if there’s going to be a lack of deals then I’m not sure if this will be a worthy upgrade over the NA 4 cylinder CX-50
A study was done on vehicle delivery charges and found they are just a way to indirectly increase MSRP nowadays. Ford laughed at everyone with their '20k' Maverick with their $1.5k delivery fee and it's built in the Mexico border. The CX-50 is built in Alabama and they're charging $1.4k that's sad. They add an additional $1k of the true delivery fee. My 3rd gen Mazda 3 had a $700 delivery fee and it was literally shipped all the way from Japan. Ford and Setllantis were the biggest delivery fee scammers and now Mazda has joined them, shame on them. "The conclusion of many consumer advocates is that inflating destination fees is just a way for automakers to boost the bottom line without officially raising prices. “There is no reason why destination charges are not incorporated into the cost of the vehicle,” Gillis says, “except that it enables the manufacturer to charge more."
Based on our driving habits and our financials, a hybrid isn’t a pressing need. I like the 2.5 naturally aspirated four as it is. I think these will sell pretty well and Mazda is doing what they feel they need to do to compete.
agreed the NA 4 cylinder is brilliant and probably the better choice especially with a discount. Hybrid might be something to think about for turbo shoppers I suppose
I drive a LOT for personal and work, my CX-5 averages about 28 MPG on long road trips, and about 18 MPG for local errands on streets. I think I would save a lot more than 50 bucks a month getting about 38 MPG in both cases, that estimate seems overly conservative. The CX-50 hybrid is so tempting with better MPG, that huge moonroof, slightly bigger trunk cargo, better ground clearance, and similar Mazda goodness, but I also already love my CX-5 with AWD, actual fog lights (which also help with extra light at night), love the wheel designs, roomier cabin, etc. Will probably wait to see what they do with the 2026 CX-5 hybrid before choosing which way to go in the future.
@@GranTigerGaming again my friend that’s why I specifically mentioned in the video, those who drive a lot would benefit otherwise not so much. CX-90 also gets 28 on highway not sure why your numbers are so low.
@@MeynMotorGroup Oh no I wasnt saying anything contrary to your video, good coverage overall, was just sharing my general thoughts as the CX-50 hybrid gets closer to launch with the numbers and pricing coming out as the info you're sharing is what they are also saying. AWD gets about 2 less MPG than FWD, plus hills, so real world its also going to be a bit lower than EPA averages at 60 MPH.
Any news on the CX five going hybrid? I’m hoping they take a page from the Honda Civic hybrid playbook and come up with a hybrid that is as fast as the turbo, but better fuel economy
Yes you are correct, most are in east coast. I saw they recently partnered with Clutch and I believe that's how they got Mazda deals now so wasn't sure if mazda deals would be in D.C. or Florida. But yea they can ship nationwide had 2 cars shipped with them no problem.
38 MPGs combined? That's it? My CX-70 "mild hybrid" inline 6 gets 28 MPGs combined and it's a land yacht. I would've expected more from the hybrid CX-50 than 10 more MPGs.
Just highly disappointed that the base trim does not get a hybrid option. You have to spend thousands extra for the preferred trim with a slow power lift gate. Real shame.
@@MeynMotorGroupAbstractly, I admire the hybrid system’s complexity and its multi-serviceability. Concretely, I won’t buy a hybrid system because of its complexity and multi-serviceability.
Doesn't need it Mazda's torsion beam is better than most multi links plus it was designed for better off roading as well. Drives identical to the CX-5 with a multi-link.
I'm pretty sure if it's using the Toyota Hybrid System, it's most likely using their rear suspension as well because the rear motor connects to rear axle/ suspension. It would cost Mazda more to redesign the rear axle/ suspension to use their torsion beam and combine with Toyota rear electric motor. That's my guess.
@@jj5515 they haven’t disclosed it combined mpg is the average of highway and city mpg that’s all for reference a RAV4 hybrid gets 39 mpg combined and 41 city 38 Highway.
@@MeynMotorGroup Exactly and IMO, it's a clear step down from the Mazda non-hybrid drive train. Drive the RAV 4 back to back with the CX-50 and IMO, you're taking several steps back in refinement. The E-CVT is also a penalty in regards to response and noise. BAM, go drive them both and make your own decision.
@@lorimcquinn3966 Toyota improved it over the years the 2024 RAV4 Hybrid I recently tested was decent not the same car from like 5 years ago Mazda will be retuning and tweaking as well to make it more refined
@@MeynMotorGroup I'm not saying it' s (Rav 4 Hybrid) not a decent vehicle. That said, I feel the CX-50 in non-hybrid form is more refined and fits the Mazda format much better. Regardless of any measures Mazda can implement for the Hybrid model, I feel the overall concept of the Mazda feels neutered/compromised in comparison. My guess is Mazda will provide more insulation and acoustic window glass in a attempt to quiet things down although this will not provide the feel the Mazda's drive train are known for.
See my 2024 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Review: ruclips.net/video/v9lLapvXtJE/видео.html
This might be the perfect do-everything car. I'm amazed the RAV4 sells so well when it feels like a tin can inside and handles like a bowl of jelly. I literally felt unsafe driving my sister's RAV4 because the steering was uncomfortably uncommunicative, and the throttle and brakes were ridiculously spongy. This tried-and-true, extremely efficient powertrain, combined with Mazda's expertise in interior design, handling, and NVH mitigation makes this a much better option if you're not just looking for another soulless appliance on wheels.
Because older ladies like it not teenaged boys
I like pugs
It's encouraging they are using Toyota's tried and true hybrid system. Wonder if that's enough to get people to want the hybrid at that price point
@@davidglad yea I think it will sell well and I guess it would be a better and more practical choice than getting the turbo version but hybrids are really also frugal shoppers so would they just be better off with a regular NA Mazda? Idk
Great review Kevin! with the legendary Toyota hybrid powertrain, I have no doubt that the 2025 Mazda CX-50 will be a top seller for Mazda!
@@sachinnair91 for sure my friend! I think this will be desirable but if there’s going to be a lack of deals then I’m not sure if this will be a worthy upgrade over the NA 4 cylinder CX-50
A study was done on vehicle delivery charges and found they are just a way to indirectly increase MSRP nowadays.
Ford laughed at everyone with their '20k' Maverick with their $1.5k delivery fee and it's built in the Mexico border.
The CX-50 is built in Alabama and they're charging $1.4k that's sad. They add an additional $1k of the true delivery fee.
My 3rd gen Mazda 3 had a $700 delivery fee and it was literally shipped all the way from Japan.
Ford and Setllantis were the biggest delivery fee scammers and now Mazda has joined them, shame on them.
"The conclusion of many consumer advocates is that inflating destination fees is just a way for automakers to boost the bottom line without officially raising prices. “There is no reason why destination charges are not incorporated into the cost of the vehicle,” Gillis says, “except that it enables the manufacturer to charge more."
@@Argedis bingo, this matrix is a scam.
They charge the same, just allows them to advertise a lower base price. Just price out the totals when comparing models you want.
Toyota's hybrid system in a Mazda vehicle that doesn't look & drive like a FUGLY, cheap-looking Toyota SUV/Crossover sounds like a win-win.
True!
The problem with Hybrid Rav4 in the past is the cablegate, I hope Mazda does not make the same Mistake
Even though Toyotas ECVT have proven to be pretty reliable I’m glad Mazda is sticking with an automatic transmission
e-CVT is being used for the Hybrid. NA 4 cylinder and turbo continue to use the 6 speed auto
@@MeynMotorGroup I see, thanks
no problem my friend
Unfortunately, hybrids can't use traditional automatic tranny. Has to be cvt of sorts.
@@oleglishchenko4922 that's not true hyundai and kia use an auto for their hybrids it's just not that beneficial. Toyota's eCVT is brilliant
Based on our driving habits and our financials, a hybrid isn’t a pressing need.
I like the 2.5 naturally aspirated four as it is.
I think these will sell pretty well and Mazda is doing what they feel they need to do to compete.
agreed the NA 4 cylinder is brilliant and probably the better choice especially with a discount. Hybrid might be something to think about for turbo shoppers I suppose
Direct injection, possibility for carbon buildup
For the $3000 price diference it takes 100,000 miles to see the savings in gas.
If I do get an SUV, this is the only option.
Great review
@@Normalguy7100 thanks!
I drive a LOT for personal and work, my CX-5 averages about 28 MPG on long road trips, and about 18 MPG for local errands on streets. I think I would save a lot more than 50 bucks a month getting about 38 MPG in both cases, that estimate seems overly conservative. The CX-50 hybrid is so tempting with better MPG, that huge moonroof, slightly bigger trunk cargo, better ground clearance, and similar Mazda goodness, but I also already love my CX-5 with AWD, actual fog lights (which also help with extra light at night), love the wheel designs, roomier cabin, etc. Will probably wait to see what they do with the 2026 CX-5 hybrid before choosing which way to go in the future.
@@GranTigerGaming again my friend that’s why I specifically mentioned in the video, those who drive a lot would benefit otherwise not so much. CX-90 also gets 28 on highway not sure why your numbers are so low.
@@MeynMotorGroup Oh no I wasnt saying anything contrary to your video, good coverage overall, was just sharing my general thoughts as the CX-50 hybrid gets closer to launch with the numbers and pricing coming out as the info you're sharing is what they are also saying. AWD gets about 2 less MPG than FWD, plus hills, so real world its also going to be a bit lower than EPA averages at 60 MPH.
Any news on the CX five going hybrid? I’m hoping they take a page from the Honda Civic hybrid playbook and come up with a hybrid that is as fast as the turbo, but better fuel economy
Not yet my friend
Most of AutoCompanion is East Coast. Some CA. Unless you want to pay extra to have the vehicle delivered to you.
Yes you are correct, most are in east coast.
I saw they recently partnered with Clutch and I believe that's how they got Mazda deals now so wasn't sure if mazda deals would be in D.C. or Florida.
But yea they can ship nationwide had 2 cars shipped with them no problem.
Very informative video
Glad you liked it
Very Nice!
Agreed! Def a great offering from Mazda
38 MPGs combined? That's it? My CX-70 "mild hybrid" inline 6 gets 28 MPGs combined and it's a land yacht. I would've expected more from the hybrid CX-50 than 10 more MPGs.
@@joerichardwad1645 it’s just epa estimates it can do better in the real world.
Just highly disappointed that the base trim does not get a hybrid option. You have to spend thousands extra for the preferred trim with a slow power lift gate. Real shame.
Can Mazda, or any car company, make a $20k crossover that people actually want. I just want a car I put my bike in the back of
@@raymond_sycamore get a base CX-30 at 9% off MSRP that’s cheap enough
After driving a hybrid lexus for a year now, it's only worth it if one only drives in a city. Otherwise, it's pointless, in my opinion.
@@AD-lf9ck yup that’s also true very little benefit on the highway NA 4 cylinder is fine for that
@@MeynMotorGroupAbstractly, I admire the hybrid system’s complexity and its multi-serviceability. Concretely, I won’t buy a hybrid system because of its complexity and multi-serviceability.
3 letters……CVT. I have a 3 word response………. MAZDA PLEASE DON’T
Toyota’s E-CVT is very reliable, it has nothing to do with conventional belt driven CVT.
I'm surprised they don't use the 5th gen hybrid system of the camry, 232hp awd
Maybe toyota did it purposely so it'll give the next gen rav4 an advantage when it does come out
Still no independent rear suspension, huh? Team Subaru for the suspension type and tuning.
Doesn't need it Mazda's torsion beam is better than most multi links plus it was designed for better off roading as well. Drives identical to the CX-5 with a multi-link.
I'm pretty sure if it's using the Toyota Hybrid System, it's most likely using their rear suspension as well because the rear motor connects to rear axle/ suspension. It would cost Mazda more to redesign the rear axle/ suspension to use their torsion beam and combine with Toyota rear electric motor. That's my guess.
Mazdas torsion beam is actually semi-independent, with butterfly design capable of "twisted-center beam" on some load.
@@djhrjeiwhri I would not be surprised. The Cx30, M3, Cx50 are among best driving / handling vehicles in their class.
@@kevtn8 这车结构本来就是混动设计，马自达和丰田已经在中国完成了CX50混动版的制造并且销售了9个月~
What's the Canadian equivalent of Auto Companion?
My bro 🤝😎👍🏾👍🏾
Hey brother hope you're having a blessed day and thanks for supporting this Mazda vid.
What’s the mpg in the city and highway? lol I don’t get what they mean when it’s 38 combined
@@jj5515 they haven’t disclosed it combined mpg is the average of highway and city mpg that’s all for reference a RAV4 hybrid gets 39 mpg combined and 41 city 38 Highway.
What is the fuel ⛽️ tank size in the CX-50 hybrid?
Hopefully will be the same as the regular CX 50, which is about 15.9 gallons
Why...?
Finally!
Agreed!
Very the same suv but dont care bout one timeless design
True my friend!
I was really hoping for a PHEV cx50
Exactly !
Honestly that might be coming as well but we will have to see
Color match the ugly black plastic wheel trim, ditch the pano roof and I'll park one in my driveway.
👊🏾👍🏾👍🏾
CX-50 Hybrid: Neutered version , Hard pass on a vehicle I really like, unfortunate.
Why is it neutered? It's the same system from a RAV4
@@MeynMotorGroup Exactly and IMO, it's a clear step down from the Mazda non-hybrid drive train. Drive the RAV 4 back to back with the CX-50 and IMO, you're taking several steps back in refinement. The E-CVT is also a penalty in regards to response and noise. BAM, go drive them both and make your own decision.
@@lorimcquinn3966 Toyota improved it over the years the 2024 RAV4 Hybrid I recently tested was decent not the same car from like 5 years ago Mazda will be retuning and tweaking as well to make it more refined
@@MeynMotorGroup I'm not saying it' s (Rav 4 Hybrid) not a decent vehicle. That said, I feel the CX-50 in non-hybrid form is more refined and fits the Mazda format much better. Regardless of any measures Mazda can implement for the Hybrid model, I feel the overall concept of the Mazda feels neutered/compromised in comparison. My guess is Mazda will provide more insulation and acoustic window glass in a attempt to quiet things down although this will not provide the feel the Mazda's drive train are known for.