Ukraine crisis: NATO reinforces its eastern flank | DW News
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Dialog and deterrence in the Ukraine crisis: This week kicked off with high-level meetings in Kyiv, Moscow, Washington and Berlin - a flurry of talks that has kept hopes of a diplomatic solution alive.
But Eastern European countries, who feel most acutely threatened by Russia's military build-up, are not relying on discussions and the threat of sanctions to protect them. They've requested additional military support.
The US has responded by sending extra soldiers to NATO members Poland and Romania. The US is sending two-thousand additional troops in total. Further north, Lithuania hopes it can persuade the US to permanently station troops there - instead of rotating troops as it does now. Along with the US, European NATO members have also been boosting their support of the alliance's eastern flank.
Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#Russia #Ukraine #NATO
Do people realize how much this is costing! There is always money for war, never enough to feed and heat the homes of the people paying for war.
Remember, journalist, and logistics specialist always put a price tag on these maneuvers but in reality it doesn't cost countries like US & Russia anything. US and Russia keep massive strategic stock piles of fuel, arms, etc. that is why we carry out military drills to burn up old stockpiles.
Russia always had build tanks before refrigerators. Russians are used to that, they have also always been under a dictator.
that's a rhetorical question, right? Of course, they do realize how much this costs.
suggestions?
Mr. Putin has built some high technology weapon systems and tanks in recent years. I wonder if the people are happy with him spending their money on such war systems. For me when Mr. Putin doesn’t get his own way he reacts with violence just like he did in 2014.
@@imerupp It does cost money, I'm not sure where you are getting that. Everyone country keeps a stock pile it's just US and Russia have one of the biggest as they are super powers. Military drills are used to project military power. Lots of countries do it and still keep their old stockpiles.
Germans are very good at speaking around direct questions about weapons deliveries without really answering. There's a reason they don't want to be seen as arming Ukrainians...I just don't know if they are good reasons, because "peace good, war bad" is not a valid response while we are dealing with a direct aggression against an ally. Yes, peace is wonderful, but what do you want to do about the giant army in a position to invade within hours? "peace is good, war is bad..." sigh...ok then, auf Wiedersehen I guess.
Because Germans know Ukraine can't get Crimea back. Yet they have a military policy of taking it back. So letting Ukraine joining NATO means starting a war with Russia. For me a Ukraine Russia war is better than a NATO Russia war
Blow the Nord Sud pipeline....evict Russia 🇷🇺 from Kaliningrad...cede to Poland.
Because everyone thinks this is a problem of Ukraine and not related to it. Putin establishes a huge military base in Belarus and will advance with an army to the Polish border via Ukraine, this would already be a problem for the Germans as well.
Buddy I do agree with you👌
⅖
Journalist, simple question: What is your opinion about the sky being blue?
The diplomat: I believe that the macarrone cheese has a really good taste and that is the reason for all of the situation we are in right now.
That is the job of the diplomat. To keep both sides calm, not putting any blame on anyone, just talk and get to an agreement.
Ukraine needs bulldozers to create earth high lines, 5 spaced lines, a wall between dnieper river on belarus border around all the border until the dnieper river end side.
After that, bomb seeds in winter, between that 5 lines wall to create a great green wall, anti land invasions. But allowing wild species, including homo sapiens, to pass, but not land vehicles.
Tanks of today can swim, amphibian tanks, but can drop adult tree after adult tree... Russian soldiers can cut trees to create a path, but that takes time and become easy targets for ukranian soldiers.
@@ricardoxavier827 There's simply _not enough time_ at this point. The word on the street is that Putin begins to push into Ukraine within 48 hours. (edit) Looks like I was wrong about the 48 hours, eh? 😁
@@snickle1980 i know, i am just spreading the idea if the attack dont happen. Ukranians must know that they dont need to equal russian hardware to be able to stop their hardware.
They just need buldozzers and trees. No more open spaces between the two nations.
@@ricardoxavier827 Yes, that's a classic warfare idea. There's a name for that, but i just woke up. 😑
Countering high tech armorment with the least expensive option is a beautiful thing.
It Worked great for us against the bloody British, and it worked great against us in Nam and other smaller conflicts, as a matter of fact. 😕
My main concern is about Russia air superiority. They need more surface to air man-pads, or whatever they're called.
Forgot what the name for that system is, but keeping mobile with a small signature seems vital to the resistance.
Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia always at war. So much human life has been wasted for nothing. God have mercy on all of us.🙏
Well, all of their wars have America's hands in them.
Don't forget America mate, the instigator of many conflicts, the only western country fighting a domestic war on drugs, and fighting a war in Mexico against cartels claiming more lives than the Ukrainian conflict.
Would you not defend your country/family if anther country was pushing close to your borders?
"They got money for war but can't feed the poor." - 2pac
Russia?
They only get money if they buy weapons
so there's a saying in Ukraine that in russia the people eat from the tv not the fridge.
@@nhajas1 ukraine wants to sanction russia, it can do it by blowing up its own pipeline. Or stopping the flow. People are delutional when they think they are better than Russia
Biggie is the illest
100% diplomat / politician - he did not give a single straight answer to straitforward questions.
Because he was trying to bait him into agreeing with his views
@@TheBlackMamba556 OK, but than what was the problem for him simply to say that he did not agree with such a view?
It is alwasy painfull to watch / hear someone speaking that way. It's like wasting viewers' time - saying nothing in fact.
It's more benefit to US that Ukraine falls to Russia so they can have more control on the EU
@@Alex-pj8nz Some of these narratives people dream up are shockingly idiotic.
Diplomat= phd in used car salesmanship ; he will sell a broken car as almost perfect to a 6month pregnant singlemom
Should have kept the nukes.
One thing you never wish to trade away if you happen to have them: nukes.
give em some
And what they were supposed to do with them????
Dude read before making such silly comments! They did not have any access to these nukes!!! All the codes were in Russia so Ukraine having these nukes is exactly like not having them. Plus they did not possess the technology to develop nor to actually use them.....
@@lovinradios6495 give them some? How about we give Cuba some as well and see how would that play... Oh wait.....
NATO IS VIOLATING THE BUDAPEST AGREEMENT
This situation in Ukraine reminds me of 1984 by George Orwell on a lot of levels.
I thought it was just me who got the reference
I see nuclear heads here. That included the EU and the USA in the second round. Nothing is similar to this.
Mankind’s madness continues as his uncivilised world continues to uncivilise itself.
🦘🇦🇺
Maranatha R 22 20
What if ukraine was not a target but a distraction?
That’s a shout
Well the target is Nordsteam 2 so you kinda are correct
When us-capitol was stormed, they replaced the atom suitcases. They are now in the ukraine. When us-command appears they will receive a radiosignal triggering a megaton nuke that flies to Germany destroying Bremen. They will declare it as cyber terrorism. Internet rights will be removed. People will be blamed.
@@alexandergraf8855, your imagination is endless, bravo.
Distraction for domestic use, for citizens to focus on something other than sorry state of Russian raw material based economy.
Probably not what you meant
Didnt they do opposite of what Putin wanted? Move all troops away from Russian borders ???
AM NOT LONGER WAITING FOR THE STIMULUS CHECKS BECAUSE I EARN $22,000 EVERY 14-16 DAYS 🚀
That's a lot of cash, please can you explain how you make so much cash in 14 days?
Please ma can you explain to me my financial is bad situation
@@gangbela2162 Success depends on the actions or steps you take to achieve it. Show me a man without investment and I'll tell you how long it takes to go bankrupt. Investing creates a safe heaven for the future. With the right investment choice that has at list a 2%minimum risk and with the advice of an expert, profit are interest are 100% guaranteed.
I have hard a lot about investing with mrs Lydia and how good she is, please how safe are the profits?
@@donaldwess4461 Yes I can assure you because I have also
Been trading with her, profits are secured and over %100 returns on your investment.
It might get bad real quick everyone be safe out there e
You to 👍
Diplomacy don’t do jack on barbaric countries, time to use force
Bla bla bla bla bla, bla bla blaa blla bllla bla. Bla bla bla, bllaa bla bla.
3:55 This dude realy is selling some trenches in the mud here.
Hope no more war no more blood shed 🙏
But the money! Think about how much money could be made!
I wish more Russian people knew that there's not any issue with them, just the "leadership"!
Just the leadership of the masters.of disasters jusa
then why you all are eager for economic saction which dont hurt the leadership it hurt only people. The reality is that you all see russian enemy.
@@Jesus-gr9ig say it louder for the people in the back
It's about Russian people. Anti Russia when Russia was communist, anti Russia when Russia is capitalist, even when leader wasn't a Russian but a Georgian, still anti Russia, this's issue with the people, not leadership.
I wish more Americans knew theres no issue with them. Just the anti white leadership
America will throw Ukraine under the bus!
UK has no logistics problems when it comes to sending arms to miles away from the country. But when it was daily essentials for their citizens, delays everywhere.
Daily essentials? Go and live in North Korea or Cuba if you want to live in a communist country
@@stretfordender11 China is pretty good.
@@rahmatmulyadi678 China is somewhat capitalist now
@@rahmatmulyadi678 if you include genocide as good then that is your prerogative
@@stretfordender11 So why do you keep buying MADE IN CHINA products?
What's wrong with Russia., is it pride or greed in power?
What's wrong with NATO pushing up to Russia's borders?
@@jeffs4483 literally nothing? When has NATO attacked anyone? When has Russia attacked anyone? I can remember a few examples in the latter.
@@maximusasauluk7359 Didn't NATO attack Yugoslavia, Serbia, Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq? Putin is the only reason NATO didn't destroy Syria too.
@@MWENDA-vv5im
Correct.
@@maximusasauluk7359 You have a very selective memory bordering on dementia. Serbia rings a bell? Iraq? Libya? Syria? Afghanistan? And that is only in recent years.
Minsk agreement wasn't designed to bring peace. I was designed to continue the hybrid aggression against Ukraine.
BUDAPEST AGREEMENT WAS DESIGNED TO PREVENT NATO EXPANSION IN UKRAINE
@@21boxhead budapest agreement was to respect ukraines borders, which russia broke when they invaded and annexed crimea in 2014
The government in Ukraine is a regime that came into power by thuggery with the support of the West. Europeans never learntt a lesson from WW1 and WW2 all started in Europe and it looks like WW3 could start in Europe. They will incinerate themselves out of existence with their own weapons of mass destruction. Bye bye Europe and western civilization in general. You'll destroy yourselves with your own hands.
@@abobanger9054 Read the history of Russia and Crimea. Read the history of Crimea war between Russia, Britain, France and Turkey. Stop eating human waste for breakfast and supper and writing and articulating ignorance and intellectual stupidity.
@@baruasafi5880 🤣🤣
Kudos to Alexander Hug, really solid interview!
Danced around all the questions!
Some of the questions were very bias and leading actually. Example 'the US and UK have supplied weapons to Ukraine, that won't have any impact though will it?' Doesn't explain they're specific defensive weapons that Ukraine are without, mainly anti tank weapons.
Please stop saying kudos, it's all you people use
Peace loving people requesting PEACE in Ukraine, STOP the war 🙏 ✨ ❤
NATO is the Federation army we see in futuristic films.
And they are not always the good guys 🤔
Let's there be no war and let peace prevail.
America says No, they want more wars and conflicts.
@@duyhung2528 no we don’t, but we will protect our allies
War is no use for anyone, if Russia invades what is NATO stopping from pushing all the way to Moscow if it fails
It's true US is fueling the tensions, but without the US, Russia would've already taken Ukraine.
Does Russia not have the right to protect Crimea and its Russian peoples in the Donbass from being sent off to concentration camps by the VIOLENT COUP Kiev Junta that seized Ukraine in 2014, overthrew its democratically-elected president, then looted the Ukraine Treasury?
Imagine what the Usa say if somebody come up on their border?
You're not wrong....it would be seen as something far different. Although this is an independent country deciding for itself but not saying that it's something you want on your border. Being independent is what they want as well.
we would say “bye bye”
Kiev Rus is belongs to Russia from the 8th century usa have no right there
Siike i don't think anyone WANTS to resolve it down smh 🏃 innocent people ruuuuun
I am ashamed of my homeland Germany. We should equip the Ukraine with our best tanks and fighters and not just with bla bla bla and 5000 helmets
Your politicians know that charity begins at home. Be proud on your beautiful country and leaders that put their own people first.
Then pay with your own money for it. We dont want to pay for the corrupt and thiefing nation called Ukraine!
@@bismark5809 Nothing close to the situation now.
@@HedgehogZone Germany has like one of the biggest economies in Europe and some other countries sent more than Germany
The Dutch send eighty soldiers to Lithuania. That will shake Russia in their boots.
Thats like their entire force
i am dutch and i hate it how much of a puppets they are to america. sick of it that my tax money goes to this kind of BS. they literally have no rights to be there. same as when my government gave isis 25 million euros because america wanted them to do so. i mean remember ISIS is created by america israel and england. sick of the western world feeding the warmongering terrorists in america.
THERE WILL BE WARS, AND RUMORS OF WARS, GODSPEED PEOPLE IN THE APOCALYPSE AND ALWAYS FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT
The US will not provide any real help, get that idea clearly.
1 solder is enough on the front lines.
Honestly, I wonder if there is even enough support at home to keep boots on the ground or even put them there. Americans are kind of desensitized and ambivalent about their own war machine outside of politics.
already helping, 700 tons of weapons and munition sent
ofc not. everything the US does is in their own interests. yet the west still think that america is helping them lol
3 emojis tells "what is all about": 💰💸🤑
Mathew 24:6 " and you will hear of
Wars and rumours of wars"
Wars and rumours of wars continue. Perilous times shall come. We are in the end of end times.The second coming of Lord Jesus is very near.The King is coming..
Cant it be settled in CSGO?
what about battlefield
Too many Russian shills in this comments section.
A lot of Chinese and Russian bots in all US and English speaking news outlets and casters. They're the vanguard for the information war they're waging against us.
@@TheRiiiight Ironically, in the long-term they are probably making more people hate China and Russia.
@@paulwally9007 wow, but you already hated us, so what difference does it make?
Too many western brainwashed shills in the comment.
Too many Americans who can't mind their own business in the comments section.
The one thing that Putin has accomplished, is that it has shown countries like Ukraine could benefit a lot from NATO membership.
Haha true. I thought the same. 😂
Not when US is nuked to death!
You are totally wrong! NATO membership means less security and being enslaved by the US hegemon. In a real fight with Russia, NATO members can't win! When they win the conventional phase of a war they will lose the nuclear end game. When they lose the conventional war US will not rescue them with their nuclear power. Article 5 means less security and less prosperity because US drains allies resources by blackmailing them into inflated defense budgets and draws them into every war on earth US war hawks want to fight.
yeah not at all.
@@twenlil you mean the whole world then I assume
We need trump's wall
you do know people can still climb over that wall right?
^^^^ ^^^^^
“Increase Your Satisfaction … By Understanding Your Existence”
EXISTNC
I thought they evacuated the US Embassy 🤔🤔
They gave US personnel and citizens the opportunity to evacuate but didn’t make them if they did not want to. However if things escalate they have warned them that they will not be sending out a plane to get remaining US citizens/workers there. They will be stuck in a warzone
As with the teachings of Sun Tzu, war with Russia is less than necessary, or needed; Ukrainian membership in NATO is likewise irrelevant... as the rest of their neighbors are already... either de facto or by formal treaties... flocking to NATO-standardized, equipped and integrated military defense systems; Finland ordered 68 F-35 advanced fighter jets, while, in turn, transferring their F-16 Fleet to Romania... Bizness is a-boomin'... thanks, Vlad.😁😁
And if you're European? You speak only for yourself and no other European. Only you. The truth is, that we Europeans and British, only see the USA as the world's global terrorist, today. And regardless of our own Washington puppet governments today, the people of Europe, including the UK, want nothing to do with the USA at all.
And should any of our own governments even think of trying to back the USA up, in any oncoming war?, well, you can be 100% sure that would see every European country fall into all-out civil wars, before any of us would ever allow that to happen.
The Irony, of course, is?, that we'd all fight against the USA today?. As we'd all be, once again, on the right side of history, fighting US tyranny for our own freedom, as otherwise we might as well be asking when will it be our turn?.
Seemingly these Americans have no idea the F-22 and F-35 can't see, track, or target any other stealth aircraft from BVR (beyond visual range). Stealth alone defeats high-frequency (short wave) radar by absorption and deflection, it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave) radar. Therefore, to see, track, and target stealth aircraft you must have long-wave radar, but it must also be enhanced to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
Neither the APG-77 radar used in the F-22, nor the APG-81 radar used in the F-35, can see any other stealth aircraft from BVR (without enhanced long wave radar) - This fact the US Air force obviously know! Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat? So how can these US aircraft be seen as any sort of threat to either China or Russia, who both have these aircraft technically beaten? They can see and target US jets from BVR, yet the US jets can't even see them from BVR?
Russia's new 5th generation Byelka (2band) radar, used in SU-57, does have enhanced long-wave radar, they've designed and developed the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've cleverly embedded L-band AESA radars in the leading edges of the wings. The new L-band AESA radar data gets processed in real time through extremely powerful Russian Elbrus computers being significantly enhanced removing all clutter, meaning it can see, track, target, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
They can also interact in ''real-time'' with each other member of the squadron, auto selecting the best placed BVR missile, that can be fired by anyone of them with a target on radar, they can also take control of surface-to-air (SAM) missile defence systems - (that alone is lethal), and they can see track, enemy stealth fighter aircraft long before Russian airspace, from much greater distances, with "real-time" data from massive Russian ground long wave stations (that are all protected today with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Therefore, as they'll always know where the enemy aircraft are, they'll always be able to approach any enemy aircraft head on, and therefore stealthily, (Russia wisely sacrificed rear end stealth for much better manoeuvrability) meaning today, the US fighter jets would not even be able to see them coming!! Russia's Byelka (2band) radar covers all aspects of frequencies across all channels, that are used for tracking, targetting, and also jamming. It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57.
Russia tested much of this new radar suit on the SU-35, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into SU-35's permanently, meaning Russia's SU-35S flanker will be at no disadvantage with F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be seen and targeted from BVR, the SU-35 with the new 5th gen radar is as able to see and target the US jets from BVR, seeing the all-important Russian advantage in BVR missile distance, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/35 have, as more than critical, if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky.
In today's world of hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit. All Navies without the ability to stop these missiles are completely obsolete today.
Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile though inferior in way of operational range-400kms it can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships making it deadly to any carrier in the world. Russia also has the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks Anti-Ship missiles.
We know the USA hasn't got a destroyer that can defend against these missiles today? Making all the USA's Navy obsolete in today's world. Don't think so?
Then let's look at the distances the US jets can travel? It's about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. So how can the US deploy any carrier close enough to reach any inland target, and then get back again? They can't, anywhere inside 1700 km's they're sunk, they're toast, they're history.
So today, the real facts are very clear, the USA has no capability to attack any militarily capable country who have these modern hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles in their defensive armoury.
These are the real facts today. Whether you think so or not?, Is irrelevant, because If the risk outweighs any potential reward, gain, or result = obsolete. The USA has nothing that can stop those missiles today, and China's DF-21D is a carrier killer. A manoeuvrable Ballistic missile hurtling at your carrier. You're doomed!
You want to take on Russia? Hahahaha really? I mean seriously, what do we know? We know Russia is supremely confident they do have the ability to bring down all USA ICBM's, while we all know the USA has no defence against even the older Soviet ICBM's, let alone the modern lethal ones like Sarmat, carrying up to 24 MERVS, over speeds of Mach 20.7; 4.3 miles per second; 15,480 miles per hour.
And because we saw the USA pull out of the nuclear arms treaty, (that prohibited the creation of any short-mid range nuclear weapons)?, today, now sees even the old defensive threat of "MAD", as an obsolete defensive threat today. As Russia has already created those missiles, and done so creating, hypersonic mid-range missiles, able to carry Nuclear tipped warheads, or full nuclear warheads, travelling at speeds not seen before, being able to strike and hit all US defensive stations and platforms, along with all US nuclear silos, and destroy them all within minutes, long before the US could even begin to think about any sort of retaliatory launch.
Plus, with the networked S-400 anti-air defences used by Russia today, protecting the S-500 anti-ballistic missile defence systems, able to operate alongside Russia's new A-235 anti-ballistic missile system, with the ability to shoot down hypersonic attack weapons, hypersonic orbital platforms, ballistic missiles, and their combat units, as well as satellites in near space, ICBM's of the USA can be tracked and shot down quite easily by Russia today. Any Nuclear effort from the USA today?, would see them lose, and lose big time.
Any conventional War against Russia? They quite simply lose, that's not even up for debate, they could try to land 250,000 troops, and they'd all simply be chewed up and spat out, so where the American see Russia losing? Only God knows, as everything says otherwise. The USA has never met a fully militarily capable country! Russia is the biggest test of them all. You know, Russia is about 960 times bigger than Kuwait?. When the USA invaded Kuwait against Iraq, the USA deployed 750,000 troops. How many troops do you think they'd need to attack and invade Russia? LOLOLOLOL
Fighter Jets = Russia own the sky. Both the F-22 and F-35 are blind to all other stealth aircraft from BVR, as they don't have/lack any Long wave radar, It seems that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a threat.
Tanks = Russia own the ground. Can't even begin to argue.
Soldiers = Russian troops with reserves outnumber the USA enormously. And again, what have we ever seen from any US troops, that could make anyone think they'd be any sort of match for the Russian well-trained troops? Who are prepared to fight and die for their country, who will be fighting for all the right reasons? While US troops will only be fighting for US tyranny?
All through history in wars, you'll find the countries fighting for all the right reasons, like their own freedom? Have never lost, but have always won, yet those who fought for global control/tyranny, have all not only lost, but all have been annihilated. We see this in every war, nothing will change this time, only the annihilation might be much more severe, but just as deserved.
Electronic Warfare = the USA must be at least a decade behind Russia. Everything we've seen and know, shows this very clearly.
Navy = American carriers are of no use today against any militarily capable country armed with today's modern ASM's. In today's world of hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the DF-21D operational range (1700kms), that can sink any US carrier in the world with a single hit, means all Navy's without the ability or defence to stop these missiles, are completely obsolete today. Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile, though inferior in way of operational range (400kms) it can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships making it deadly to any Carrier in the world.
Missiles = Russian missiles rule the world today, with her modern hi-tech missiles and targeting systems. Russian GLONASS, GPS, give Russia such incredible precision, the USA has nothing to compare.
In Syria, Russian (long range) missiles are at a 100% success rate! That's unprecedented, no country has ever been over a 40% strike rate before, and that was only achieved with minimal missile usage, most have only managed 20-30% with missiles before.
As we've all witnessed, Russia was pinpoint accurate from distances as far away as 6500 km. Russia has also provided clear, precise footage of all her long range missile attacks in Syria, (that we can see all came from the Russian control room online).
Hypersonic missiles?, the USA can't defend against?, yet Russia can?, and Russia does already have lethal hypersonic missiles already in her arsenal.
Personally in any coming war? I give the USA precisely zero chance, none, not even a little snippet of a chance, annihilation is all they'll get. And being even more honest?, quite deservedly so!
It is clear to us that we have to defend our interests, and to do so consistently, not boorishly or rudely, in both the sphere of the economy and of defence. The pressure will only end when the USA will be “persuaded” that the methods they are using are ineffective, counterproductive, and harmful to all ~ Vladimir Putin, 2014.
It never fails to amaze me the way our partners the US, (as we say in Russia) Stand on the same rake twice.~ Vladimir Putin, 2016.
The United States must “Rise above their endless desire to dominate” ~ Vladimir Putin, 2018.
For the first time in all the history of nuclear weaponry, including the Soviet period, we aren’t playing catch-up with anyone. Other states have yet to create the weapons that Russia already has, ~ Vladimir Putin, 2020.
Talk about NOT taking the hint? LOL.
Suicide is painless...
I reckon by 2023 (if the US is still around), we'll see the US roll out her new (deep lavender, with light purple polka dots) battle tanks. They'll roll out their new 5th generation, (bright pink with sky-blue undertones) fighter aircraft, with, (luminous peach, polka dots) only added to her carrier based aircraft.
They'll proudly show the whole world their new huge, enormous, unmissable target, the (soft lilac) Aircraft Carrier - USS Barack Obama, with a very special (rainbow coloured landing deck).
The Rainbow will also be the new flag/ensign of the US military (Army, Navy, & Air force). - All personnel, from Cadet through to top officers, will all be required to always carry a silk rainbow handkerchief. (especially in hostile areas), for dabbing away the fear tear. LOL. It makes good sense, man!
As, we did see an American Captain in tears when arrested In Iranian waters?, we saw him with his entire crew, all sitting cross-legged on a carpet, crying with snot hanging from their noses, (they were all eating cakes and drinking fizzy pop), while crying like brats, then they just hand over their passwords, laptops, and phones, openly allowing the Iranian's to access all of their military information? Ha!
And the USA wants to take on the North Korea's, Russia's, Iran's, and China's, of this world, four highly armed and very well-defended countries, with Armies of millions of men, all fully bled, trained, and prepared to fight and die for their countries, that completely outnumber the USA by millions??? Oh, SURE!! LOLOL
The USA struggles against the Taliban, and other non-militarily capable countries, man! They've never met a fully militarily capable country in war, they lose against non-militarily capable countries all the time!!
Germany is just concerned with keeping their homes WARM, that's all!!
Just talk the talk and never give you answers.
Adoctrination.!!! Soft power.!!!
Russofobia...
Bla.bla.bla.
The Ukrainians are patriots of the country. I have great respect for them. I strongly believe that the powers that be have an alternative plan. Something is up and they are keeping it secret. The said thing is America is appearing two faced.
not a fan of maidan protest and what come next after it . they have a chance to play neutral just like Viet Nam and many small country sitting next to big country . but they choose to go big and turn to only 1 side which is really dumb . no country will pour a bunch of money and life for another if there is no benefit in it . in this conflict i can only blame Ukraine , they could play smart but instead they play ... a wrong card
@@annguyenlehoang7779 lol don't compare Ukraine situation in Vietnam. Russia does not want Ukraine to join Nato which Ukraine wanted to join and Russia wants to stop it because Moscow is threaten. Ukraine should not be afraid fighting a imperialist nation. Its just dumb to stay neutral because in times of war nobody is neutral you should side where you benefit more.
@@corpchannel2523
Russia does not want ukraine to exist.
They want a new ussr and to make sure the slavic cultures are dead and forgotten.
@@corpchannel2523 Your dream you always wanted will come true in a very different way you didnt really want. Do you remember? Russia having the most nuclear missiles of the world.
@@Agm1995gamer what a rubbish in your head, just amazing!
Ukraine.[°🦾°] God bless all people in Ukraine.🙏.
god will send u to moon without any food tomorrow. stop your god talks. nobody cares.
*I visited Ukraine. RUSSIA and UKRAINE have same culture, same tradition, same religion and similar language. Both Russia and Ukraine should be clever enough so that they can not be used by any third party to cause war between them*
Those who created the Soviet Union and later the State of Israel are the ones who are playing the same games. It's the same guys who broke the Soviet Union after it had served its purpose. It's the same people who broke up Yugoslavia and created a military base in Kosovo.
Ukraine needs bulldozers to create earth high lines, 5 spaced lines, a wall between dnieper river on belarus border around all the border until the dnieper river end side.
After that, bomb seeds in winter, between that 5 lines wall to create a great green wall, anti land invasions. But allowing wild species, including homo sapiens, to pass, but not land vehicles.
Tanks of today can swim, amphibian tanks, but can drop adult tree after adult tree... Russian soldiers can cut trees to create a path, but that takes time and become easy targets for ukranian soldiers.
@@leonardbastone1338 Imagine saying "America's history of invading other countries" with a straight face while Russia is literally poised to invade Ukraine. You either don't actually care about invasions, or you just like them when Russia does it. I wonder which one...
@@leonardbastone1338 Russia has a long history of invading and harassing neighbors. Did you skip learning the entire cold war? And since then, Georgia and Crimea.
@@baruasafi5880 In your opinion,the poeple of Kosovo dusn't ve rihgt for selfdetermination?
Russia doesn't need NATO on its doorstep. Leave Ukraine out of NATO and all will be good.
what if Ukrainians want to join themselves, to protect their country from Russia?
@@bentos117 Joining NATO would not protect Ukraine from Russia.
@@mickeencrua how many NATO countries Russia has attacked?
@@mickeencrua in any case, if Ukrainians want to join, I say, they have rights to do it
@@bentos117 Perhaps you can tell me how many NATO countries Russia has attacked? Ukranians have the right to join NATO regardless of what you say. Everybody knows that. Ukraine does not need to be in NATO. No benefits whatsoever.
ผมขอโทษผมไม่ชอบเลยในการแก้ปันหาดว้ยการใช้อาธุท่าท่านพูดคุยกันได้ก็ได้โปรดพูดคุยกันจะได้ไม่มีการบาทเจ็บลมตายกันคนทั่วโลกจะได้ไม่ตอ้งทุกข์เพาะราคาน้ำมันมันแพงสินค่าราคาจะได้ไม่ทำไห้คนทั่วโลกตอ้งเป็นทุกข์กายใจก็โรคน้ำลายอากาสเสียเป็นพิษก็ทำไห้คนทั่วโลกลมตายไปเป็นจำนวนมากท่าท่านยังจะใช้กำลังทหารก็จะทำไห้ทุกทุกย่างเลวร้ายลงผมไม่รู้ท่านเข้าใจไหมคนที่ผลิดอาวุธก็สบายคนจนจนก็บาทเจ็บลมตายลงผมไม่รู้ท่านมองเห็นหรือเปล่าท่านผู้นำ
Please NO war, innocent lives will be loss, we have all gone through major loss in lives with Covid already 😪😪😢😢
Hi Napa,
I hope so to, but its out of our hands, Napa. There is gonna be a war, unfortunately!😩😥
@@decathlonevent i doubt there will be a war . well if Ukraine not joinning nato then russia will back down . if this war broke down the only one benefit is US and its weapon companies the entire Europe including Russia ( they are also part of Europe ) will lose this way or another . even in NATO there are many conflict in its member . German clearly dont want this war so they only sent some helmet and medical tent
This will kill many more than covid
@@annguyenlehoang7779 the whole thing started with Ukraine wanting to join Nato and EU and then some pro Russians got mad and wanted to be in Russia and now this is happening
@@Nicko0 Ukraine doesn’t need to join nato.
An interesting fact: deploying military units and vehicles in the Ukrainian borders correspondingly increases demand in fuel and energy in those regions. As the maintenance always tries to use locally available supplies first, the indirect contractor for those troops' energy supply is Russia :)
False
@@BobJason1 What "false"? As we were stationed in Poland, we were buying fuel from the polish state, which bought it from Germany, which buys it from Russia (among others, but still).
A new fabricated conflict to make some investors happy ..?
Arms sales will go up as the costs of having the troops on standby.
A few years ago i read about a new silkroad from asia to europa promising some benefits for the region.
Instead of investing that money
in rebuilding that region as a model for renewable infrastructure we drop bombs and build trenches...
Way to go human race...
Nope, this is true, and sadly the result of modern war intertwined with late stage capitalist economies spreading into each other
Some servicemembers in Belarus were caught selling barrels of fuel at a high price.
Putin is a crazy person 😳
Yes! Germany is making a mistake not sending weapon to Ukraine.
lol no they are not. if they are smart they stay out of it. but they are puppets of america as well so most likely they will get involved in it. which they already are i believe. Russia should just cut off Nordstream 2.
🇺🇸 sit back AND watch NATO take care of Putin issue. 🇺🇸 just watch 🇺🇸 backyard. 😆
Ukraine is. Too many Troops on the borders is not the best idea. It leaves the door open for other Troops to go around. When a County puts its eggs on one County. This leaves many other countries to cover flanks. So this could be a serious problem for all Countries. WW 2 at least 6 years or so to solve. This causes a build up on alot of Countries.
This war wont last years if it happens, it will be hours or days at most.
@@rewinder2008 It's already going on 7 years.
Ukraine will probably allow Russians to enter into their country. Then Ukrainian troops will maul Russian troops as they know their terrain and they are fighting in their own territory/country like Russians did in Stalingrad. Also...their fervor to defend their country will kick in, and Ukrainian civilians will join the fight.
People complaining about the diplomat just prove they don’t understand geopolitical issues. If you actually understand what’s going on, then you’d understand this man’s answers clearly.
And what might they be exactly??
@@caesarforlife1663 Something about how Jack Stanley is secretly a genius because he already knows the word "geopolitical". Watch out for the boy, he will be really special, once he grows up.
@@stefanb6539 someone sounds jealous. When you graduate with a degree in this, then we can talk. Until then continue to sit on the sidelines and keep your mouth shut.
@John Deerham is it tho
Russian ain`t no farmer on donkey... Leaders might play a bit to far and looking in history people has no idea of limits and when to stop. Let the country leaders fights this one out one on one and call a day. And Nato only gives Putin offers where He gets nada and Nato can keep adding country's. Who would agree on them....
TAKE A PEEK AT WHAT NATO DID TO YUGOSLAVIA SHEEPLE OF AMERICA
Beware the Russian comment bots in here :)
NATO: We want Russia to de-escalate.
NATO: Escalates.
By moving 6000 troops? The Russians are surely escalating more with their more of a 100.000 prepared army. However your right to some extend, the western media really tries to create the impression Russia is an aggressive opponent
Russia never really move on from the USSR BWAHAHAHAHA...
On or about around February 20th is the critical time knowing the historic Russian moves following the Olympic Games.
Sending arms is a proverbial nuclear option for Germany at this point but as he point out it can still be put on the table and all options need to be put on the table. Germany reversing on arms deliveries is just the kinda one upping that shows strength to Russia while providing ideal escalation control that is needed to bring the Kremlin to the table!!!! If the arms provided are so insignificant what is the threat of providing them compared to what is already on the board threatening life and conflict????
They are more concerned about the future of a pipeline than the future of Ukraine. Germany is walking the tightrope in an attempt to have it both ways.
@A. M.
Well, Germany is part of NATO. So I don’t see much threat of that.
But, I understand the sentiment.
Sending conventional arms is not a „nuclear“ options. Please be precise - when talking about armed conflicts, lets reserve the term for what it actually means - deployment of nuclear weapons. We are talking conventional weapons only here. This should not be such a big deal.
@@bullpup1337
I believe he is using "nuclear option" figuratively.
But yes, in this case, it is probably not the best expression to use.
Amerika in EROPA VS SOVIET RUSIA ?!? DIS IS AMERIKA DIVIDI AND AMPIRE. AMRIK.WRONG.
វ៉ៃក្បាលគ្នាបែកហើយស្រែកប្រាប់ឲ្យគ្នាអត់ធ្មត់ទៀត
Why did Putin have his pilot fly 500KM around NATO countries in 2012 when no threat was present? Why did Putin reject an invitation by Zelensky to meet close to the Ukranian Crimea front lines? Why does Putin refuse to meet with the Dutch MH17 crash investigation board when he says he has proof that Russia did not shoot down that aircraft? Seems he would show more courage seeing that he expects his soldiers to die in Ukraine for his kingdom.
Russia will find much death in Ukraine , US has prepped them for A symmetry warfare with massive amount of explosives and traps. Door to door fighting, snipers. All those tanks will die in traffic jams on roads and in cities. They may hold Ukraine , but It will cost them 30-40% loss of forces
Half of Ukraine is Russian or related to Russians some way!
They will switch sides the first day of any conflict.
The MSM will tell you different tales,but I think that is clear for most people...the past two years showed us how the media works.
Why did the USA organize a coup in Ukraine to replace an elected government by a puppet government which had allowed the US Air Force to steal the entire gold reserve of the central bank of Ukraine in 2014?
I wanna play this scenario out in a rts game.
Wargame European Escalation
I'm sure some gaming company receiving payouts from the US military will make it a game at some point. 😐
C&C Generals with ROTR mod? Or "End of days" mod.
@Jon Hesson
It takes balls to battle!
Where are now the 85 billions worth of "space tech" weapons and highly qualified and trained 🇺🇸 army in Afghanistan !!????
Space technology versus malnourished and weak peasants talibans with "stone age" weapons!!!
🤣😂😅😇😀
it's all fun and games until it's actually NOT fun and games
❤POWER TO MOTHER RUSSIA. LONG LIVE VLADIMIR PUTIN 🇷🇺 ❤✌😎
No war. Sex
Dialoog heeft niet gewerkt. It's like Europe already gived up. Succes
Annoying accent of the host. Jeeees.
Hope we aren’t arming Ukraine like we armed Afghanistan.
Edit for clarification in case needed : I’m saying, hopefully we aren’t arming Russia as opposed to Ukraine, like we armed the taliban as opposed to Afghanistan.
It's another time of the year. One need to set goals and take bold steps in achieving them. Remember success is not obtained overnight. You just have to stop procrastinating and try what you have always wanted, to improve your life and wellbeing Investments will take you closer to that your dreams
After what has unfolded in 2020 I no longer see crypto as speculation. More as an inevitability. Even if it takes 10years to get to $100k that would mean the average rate of return with a daily $100 over a year is 100%, what asset class out there today offers that kind of opportunity?
I have heard a lot about investments with Mr Theodore Shelton and how good he is, please how safe are the profits?
I've also been trading with him, profits are secure and over a 100% return on investments
I got an astonishing $11,140 USD from my first investment with Mr Shelton and ever since then he has been delivering
his obviously the best I invested $1500 with his company and in 8 days I made profit of $5408
Ukraine need new gloves to go with their German helmets.
New gloves and swastika.
germany had it's backside kicked by russia before...it is scared shitless of russia
@@ik7584 swastika is reserved by Russians
😂🤣NATO: Hold my democracy! My 2022 weapons catalog are ready to parade!!
NATO 30 countries vs 1 country Russia.
"Denmark has deployed it's jets in Baltic sea,..." Wow, did they dive those F-15 underwater or what? I heard they are deployed in Baltic countries, not Baltic sea, journalists like this sometimes make me doubt is this reality or simulation, lol
Ask retired soldiers from other countries to come. I'm sure lots of freedom fights will come if allowed to.
Biden should not bring the US soldiers to war unless he has been bribed by the Ukraine.
I think you would find that those troops would be radicalized terrorists.
@@maskcollector6949 Haha. Thanks. I'm a machine. That is a compliment.
Nah... only fools and young are willing to die for their "nation"...
They just might be . more than you think Russian
Its so easy and simple to end this conflict. Just sign an contract that Ukraine will never join NATO as a first frontier towards Russia and the problem is over for good, there will be no war! But no, USA has its own plans, using that poor Ukrainian people...
It's not that easy. First because NATO's documents state any country is allowed to apply and join. Second, because if they publicly state that Ukraine will never join, then pro-Russia political forces in Ukraine would gain the upper hand by telling pro-Western forces that the West has abandoned them, the West doesn't want them, then once they win the elections they would make Ukraine Russia's ally.
that not enough.
Russia demands that Ukraine became confederate, weakening its centralized leadership and allowing Russia to way in from increasingly independents states.
u seem not to even know what Russia want in this war which are publicly stated.
its not about Ukraine joining NATO its about taking of the board a country next door which are projected to get way stronger and even compete with Russia, the real fear is about Ukraine itself not NATO.
it like china and India where Russia is trying to prevent new India rising next door.
Pray this stalemate will end.
Nothing will happen no one will win anything
Never if NATO still exist at Russian border...
@@bambamkitring6666 so you want NATO to not exist so Russia can annex more land of other countries? True, good idea
@@seandoyle1588 there is a diplomatic scenario that makes everyone win
@@bambamkitring6666 NATO will always exist at Russian border. If it stays away, Russia will come closer. Again.
I wouldn't be worried about east front, would be worried about HOME FRONT....
Gemarny in 2WW: "Let's Blizkrieg everyone" , Germany today:" "
I think Nato should leave while they still have a chance. They are playing with fire.
Views from both side must be presented for the ppl to come to a balanced conclusion.
They are... Russia thinks of every neighbor it doesn't control as a "security threat". All there is to it. Same thing happened in Georgia and would have happened in the Baltics if they weren't NATO allies
@@cravingtuna1561 can't generalise.nothing happened in Armenia or Azerbaijan or in any of the stans
@@prashanthbharadwaj5504 Russia literally invaded Georgia a little over a decade ago... Every time a Russian neighbor has eyes for the west, Russia intervenes. With Ukraine it all started when the people forced a pro Russia government to resign after it withdrew from a European partnership for closer ties with Russia. The same government that is currently being charged with treason.
@@cravingtuna1561 they also stoped recognising the Russian language.
@@prashanthbharadwaj5504 did they also stop kneeling for Russia? Jeezes, Ukraine,Georgia all have native languages that were forced to stop for Russian language during the soviet times. If Russia wants to live in the past it can. But if other countries want to continue enforcing their native history and move to the future it can
Thank you USA and France for being willing to send troops to Romania. We appreciate the support.
carcotasu hahahaaa, imi place numele.
Words from a spineless peasant
Leave U.S outta this
@@misha_00 Said the kremlinbot
Ukraine needs bulldozers to create earth high lines, 5 spaced lines, a wall between dnieper river on belarus border around all the border until the dnieper river end side.
After that, bomb seeds in winter, between that 5 lines wall to create a great green wall, anti land invasions. But allowing wild species, including homo sapiens, to pass, but not land vehicles.
Tanks of today can swim, amphibian tanks, but can drop adult tree after adult tree... Russian soldiers can cut trees to create a path, but that takes time and become easy targets for ukranian soldiers.
DONBESK UND Lubansk...declared independent by Putin's Duma.
Donetz people want to join Russia but get pensions from Ukraine...lol...good luck with that scenario.
EU countries need to follow through with their NATO commitments. They cannot continuously hide under the US/UK umbrella of safety. They need to show some backbone and stand up!
What are you talking about? No NATO member is threatened. Every country can choose what to do while they have zero obligations towards non NATO members.
What commitments? Is anyone attacking NATO member? Is anyone threatening to do so? If NATO is a defensive union, it should relax and calm down.
@R2012.56-M-Bot NATO is just making sure no green man appears on NATO country territory. If they do, then they get taken care of.
@@TorianTammas That is true. Regretfully, russian proxy wars are very realistic tactics. I just hope NATO stays professional and won't let be provoked.
we lived peacefully. Until Ms. Nuland brought cookies and democracy
"WAR is a Racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives." - USMC Major General Smedley Butler (1935)
Weopons Dumping ground Europe Afghan style US UK created all wars
The US European vassals are slowly going into ARMAGGEDOM....the blindness is alarming ...they didn't learn any lesson for the catastrophe of WW I and WW II and are prepared to be obliterated on behalf of the hegemon US EMPIRE.... VERY VERY SADD!!!!!!
Neither Russia nor the US have fought a technologically similar opponent in decades. The last time the US and Russia did so (at scale) was in WW2, and the losses were staggering. Both countries would be absolutely insane to risk culling their populations in a WW3 scenario.
America is destroyed.
America is trying to keep the title of number one in the world.
But now it's too late .
Some food stores don't have supplies getting ready for war
The US wants the Fuel Business that Russia has created with Europe.....
Nothing else seems to matter....
The US has lied before to promote profits.
@kızgın tosbağa is English your primary language? Just asking because it seems like you misread the tone of my comment. My last sentence implies that the odds of full-scale war happening are slim to none.
@@maskcollector6949 You seem to accept the word of the folks seeking to chase Russia out of the Multi billion buck business they seem to have built.
The US cries Crisis from thousands of miles away from Kyev....
@@eagleeagle7802 Don't believe everything you see on the video
Unfortunately, with Putin, “ behind closed door” diplomacy only works when it is done in conjunction with “megaphone” diplomacy.
They need to give patriot missles and Adrams tanks that will make Putin think twice
twice? Do you mean, Putin will consider directly arming enemies of the US in its next conflict? As USSR was fighting Taliban in 80s, USA provided Talibs with missles, money and firearms. As the US was fighting Taliban thirty years later, Russia provided USA with logistics, airbases and recon data. I think it would be better if Putin will not think twice.
Why?......nothing wrong with a federal Ukraine...where regions choose for themselves
Patriot Missiles have never worked in its life time so far ... and abram tanks will sink in bogs and river system... in all around ukraine ...
@@Hero.Lone-Wolf The Americans should get their nose out of other peoples business
Uhhh
Patriot* missiles* Abrams*
No to war.....no to EU NATO expansion and Ukraine membership
Germany send 60000 troops from Kentucky to Michigan
its about time for Europe and Russia to talk without the inherence of the United States.
Now you're catching on. And this coming from an American
@@danarosesturgeon Ukraine has lost 10% of the territory of 14 thousand dead in 8 years of the war, and we won’t even count the economic losses, they are huge, including the loss of personal property of citizens
Russia is a backwards country, the Czar would recognize the army and navy.
@@JG-mp5nb Just in case, the russian imperial navy was mostly built in dockyards of New York. So Czar wouldn't recognize it. Back then the relations between USA and Russian Empire were very good.
@@burkanov Actually, they were made on the Clyde River in Britain, the USN at that time was second fiddle to both French and German navies. The ships to have were based on British designs and built in British shipyards. Much of what Imperial Russia had was seriously Ill maintained and corresponded to sending hotels to war, such was the decadence of the Russian General Staff.
A country whose leaders were all relatives or had purchased their rank from the Czar. The Russo -Japanese War, dispelled any notion of Russian naval superiority, and WW1 polished off any chance of Russian equivalence with its competitors.
Today is no different. Russia struggles to contain Georgian and Chechnya’s forces, showing that it can eventually beat a tiny but belligerent nation today. The Finn’s further demonstrated Russian ineptitude.
Still, Putin shows it’s still possible to strangle your own population the KGB way. The Czar would be proud.
Russia gotta mellow out, message ended.
Rightttt. Just let peace be and chill
@@Maryyeung12894 Pretty much, yeah. This crisis wouldn't exist if Putin hadn't taken the initiative to put a massive army on Ukraine's border. Although now that he's in this deep, there's no way he's backing down.
"A small group: no war with Russia". Ok, why don't you tell Russia, no war with Ukraine?
Exactly. Why holding a U.S flag and protesting in front of the U.S embassy as if we have anything to do with it? lmao.
@@j.a.3138 What I was thinking. Russia invaded Ukraine is 2014 what does protesting outside US do in anyway to stop escalating Russia's actions.
UKRAINE should BOYCOT these talks !
Here comes conscription..... Hope you like new friends In matching uniforms and free socks.