Lemmino has the best video on the subject with an insane amount of production quality and writing.. But idk it's been dismissed for decades as non canon, it may be cool but they seem convinced it isn't real
Somehow this was one of the best overall coverings of the ripper that I've seen. I also really enjoyed the fact that you included both the suspects in which I truly believe were very likely to be the ripper; David Cohen & Jacob Levy.
Other than him being near the crime scene near the time of one of the deaths, everything else is speculation. Also one thing that is almost always agreed upon is the fact that someone with the MO of JTR would never have stopped killing, unless he was stopped (killed/captured), Lechmere died of old age decades after the killings. He gets no more than a 5/10. @@walkawaycat431
No evidence for either. Charles Lechmere was the ONLY suspect to have been seen by someone else lingering alone and acting suspiciously right next to the body of one of the victims at or near the time of death and with nobody else in sight or sound.
Knowing who he was would only spawn more questions - why was he way he was, what were his reasons for what he did? Only justice we can do to the victims is by helping out people in need and do what we can in our own communities to prevent conditions like those in London back in the days ever being present anywhere else, since those were to blame in equal manner as the killer himself.
If youre ever in London, I highly advice you to do one of the ripper tours! When I did it, we had a guide who was an actor as well and did an amazing job in telling the story on the locations in Whitechapel. The museum near dock street is cool as well, but a bit expensive and its better/helpfull when you already know a lot of things about the murders.
@@viviananaya6892YES. I loved going on the tour, mind you I wouldn't take your kids lol and at the time I had a six month old so hubby stayed with her while I went with my sister. It was a must see while you're in London. My Mother was born in Whitechapel so it was eerie for her.
The one thing that always irks me with Ripper documentaries is that they always tend to focus on the killer, whilst casting his victims in a negative light, labeling them as prostitutes. They never tell us anything about the hardships the Canonical Five went through, the struggles that Victorian London placed on them. They ended up in the Whitechapel district because life had torn any chance of them dealing with their struggles away from them. Yet they are only remembered because of their murderer. Jack the Ripper took the lives of five innocent women. Their voices were forever silenced on a cold, autumn night. They are remembered, not as complex human beings, but as mangled corpses left behind by the hand of a madman. There was nothing extraordinary about Jack that warranted the fame he has now. He was simply in the wrong place at the right time. And five women paid the price with their lives. Decades later, their graves have been left to deteriorate. They deserve to be remembered. It doesn't matter what they were in life, they were human beings, and they deserve to be treated with more respect.
5 women? Martha Turner Tabram was also his victim. What no one seems to understand is WHY he killed. But if you look at the evidence it is not difficult to understand.
Those women were also at the wrong place at the wrong time. 75k population only 1200 prostitutes? Yeah, life was bad back then, but they still chose the easy way out. at least hard work would've kept them a little safer.There are books, and documentaries on the women and sorry, they just aren't interesting.what the ripoer did is interesting because of the inhuman nature of the crimes. What made him do this and why did he stop! Serial killers don't usually do that. the women had tough live, drank, whored themselves out, it's society's fault, blah, blah, blah. Are you also asking for Dahmer's victims to be remembered too? Cus no one cares. Again, you okay stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
@@ladysnowblood You think they prostituted themselves as it was the easy way out? It was the last resort for many of these women, there was not enough work for all the people who lived there, especially women. Plus not all the rippers victims were prostitutes. And yes Dahmer's victims are remembered.
I turned this on for an hour and a half of background noise and wound up subscribing to the channel because so much information in this was new to me and i’ve read 2 Ripper books written with in the last few years which made me believe i was up-to date, excellent work.
@@jakebutler1863 Exactly, he ended them in a painful but quick death, and took their organs when they were dead. So he was quite sensible for doing that. But it's still very bad and extremely inhumane.
The vaginal attacks were carried out because the prince got a prostitute pregnant And caught VD as well. The palace was being bribed to hush up the pregnancy. As the palace didn’t know exactly which one he impregnated the whole bunch had to go. Hence why the vagina was torn apart so the foetus could be removed and all evidence of the unborn died and the public thought it was all a mad person killing sex workers.
I think it was Lechmere. I don't think Tabram was a victim. She was known to rob other prostitutes and it's said she was murdered as vengeance by relatives or friends of her victims. Stride was discovered by a man returning from work and he probably interrupted the crime. Kelly was possibly murdered in her home because the murderer had been almost caught at least once (Stride) and possibly twice if Lechmere was the killer. I also think all three main letters were from the killer - the one to Lusk being written whilst in a frenzied state. That said, it could have been Kaminski, or Kosminski, but I do not think the MO fits on both counts. Kaminski fits the profile only in as much as his incarceration matches the final official victim. Kosminski would perhaps have carried on killing until incarcerated in 1891. It is difficult to truthfully say who did it. I doubt we will ever know. However, I personally think the Kelly murder was the last straw for Jack and he stopped killing afterwards. He may have tried, but the police presence maybe made it too dangerous for him. He may have also stopped (one time taking his handiwork indoors) because of City Police involvement after the Mitre Square murder. There were possibly also other would-be victims but he just never got the chance having lured the woman into a possible murder site. Great video. But as I said. I think Lechmere did it. He's the only man discovered next to a murder victim. There's a few suspects based on people seen before the murders. But Lechmere is the only known direct contact. This alone makes him suspect number one. We don't know if he was considered a suspect because a lot of the police documents no longer exist. But he did lie about his name under oath at the inquest - and this fact alone could have seen him hung for the murders had the police been diligent enough to find out his real name. Lots of people say he never did the killings. But I have yet to see a viable reason for the synopsis. If Nichols is considered a Ripper victim, which she is, then Jack was interrupted because she was not left on display like the other victims - apart from Stride - where he was also interrupted. I find it too far fetched to imagine that Robert Paul discovered Lechmere / Cross next to Nichols' body, after Lechmere himself apparently disturbed the Ripper at work immediately beforehand. No one (Lechmere or Paul) saw somebody running off. And Lechmere's alibi, that he was walking forty odd yards ahead of Paul, does not make sense, because Paul never saw nor heard him. Lechmere could have been with Nichols for much longer than the few seconds he claimed. It has been established there is a rough distance of 100 yards between the murder site and the corner of Bucks Row, a tiny back street, where Paul subsequently entered behind Lechmere. Yet he never heard footsteps nor spotted Lechmere until approximately forty yards away from the dead body. The east side of Bucks Row is a straight road. PC Neal was able to flag down another policeman in the dark after discovering Nichols. The old school west of the murder site, along with a slight bend in the road, conceals who could have been walking toward the killer had he fleed. A policeman could have easily been walking along as he fled and alerted other officers with his whistle - besides also being armed with a truncheon to apprehend the killer. So I think Lechmere decided in a split second to face Paul and pretend he discovered Nichols dead body. Both the killer and prostitutes knew the time of the police rounds or beats, or prostitutes certainly did, because the women did not want to get caught with a man and fined for the crime. So when Cross and Paul went to find a policeman, PC Mizen, withholding their names, Cross presumably doing the talking, he said "you're wanted by a policeman in Bucks Row" knowing another copper would discover the corpse soon after killing Nichols. There is dispute about what was said to Mizen. But Mizen could not even recall that Robert Paul was there until prompted at the inquest. And it was Cross who discovered Nichols. So it would not make sense for Paul to speak to MIzen. Lechmere must of done all the talking. Paul might have even been stood across the road - given that Mizen did not even recall his presence. And both men then left Mizen - despite the fact that Nichols was presumably dead. It is said that Paul felt a heartbeat. This presumably means he thought she was dead or close to death. Paul wanted to sit Nichols up - which would determine whether or not she was alive or dead - and also show the neck wound. And Cross said no leave her. Or he would not help Paul. This was Robert Paul's testimony at the inquest. I think he might have suspected Lechmere but did not want to get murdered right next to Nichols. It is said Paul had a problem with the police. He went to the press behind their back after all. Yet the police were saying Neal found the body and were angry about Paul giving his version of events to the press. But almost everyone probably distrusted the police. And why did Mizen not speak out about the two men who failed to give their names to him. Or he failed to take their names, and perhaps treat the incident as a serious one, based on what he was told by Lechmere, who said she was either drunk or dead, playing down the seriousness of the issue, and allowing them to go on to work without being apprehended by Mizen. After all, had Nichols not been dead, and had Neal not discovered the body, that would mean that Mizen would have to walk the five hundred or so yards down Bucks Row searching for a woman in the dark who had possibly been drunk and got up and walked away after being disturbed from her drunken stupor by Cross and Paul. Ergo, Mizen must of been told another officer was present, so he could pinpoint the scene of the incident, without having to do it himself on a long dark road with lots of side alleys etc etc for an hour or more of his time. Cross must of told him another officer was present. And so he must of known that Neal or some officer would find Nichols after 03.45 am or thereabouts after he and Paul left her. Because as I said - the prostitutes knew the approximate police beat times - as did the killer - for his own means of escape. It also took Lechmere three days, and a news story given by Paul on the Sunday, to come forward and present himself - as Cross - to the police. Cross worked at Pickfords, en route via most of the murder victims, as a delivery man of meat for local butchers and other establishments such as restaurants. These delivery (cart) men carried knives and wore leather aprons. They were also sometimes covered in blood from the animal carcasses. He could of committed the murders either on his way to work, or during work whilst waiting for meat to be unloaded from the cart, which apparently took a bit of time, as in up to thirty minutes or more. Plus the time of death might be slightly incorrect. One neighbour said they heard Chapman cry out, whilst another said he did not see her dead body around 05.00am, but they could both be incorrect. Lechmere might have murdered Chapman around the same time, 03.30am - 03.40 am, as he (possibly) did Nichols. The fact his birth name was not discovered for well over a hundred years itself speaks volumes. Some people say he used the name Cross. But he used the name Lechmere on his marriage certificate, and on his landlord rent arrangements, and his death certificate also cites Lechmere. He only used the name Cross whilst giving evidence regarding Nichols, at his work place for some reason, and when he accidentally killed a kid with his cart in 1876. Lechmere was his name in all other circumstances as far as we know - except for when he was a child and his mother took the name Cross. It sounds like he reverted to Lechmere as an adult - except on those three occasions. It's also very interesting that both men left Mizen on their way to work and walked straight passed Annie Chapman's murder site just eight days later. Whilst if Lechmere had not walked with Paul along Hanbury street, walking passed Chapman's murder cite, and instead took the left fork down Wentworth Street - in direct view of Mizen - he would have walked right passed Martha Tabrams murder site from three weeks earlier - perhaps alerting Mizen - who may have called him or both men back. Chapman was then murdered before the inquest in Nichols' murder was not completed - taking the pressure off Lechmere via another horrific homicide and the realization that a serial killer was murdering prostitutes in the area.
I do believe it is possible Tabram was the very first murder from Jack, being the first murder irs possible Jack was still figuring out how he would kill people.
I’ve always been intrigued by Druitt.. What “personal information “ did his family pass along to Scotland Yard.. There’s no real evidence against any of the suspects, but that detail has always intrigued me?.. What did his family say, or possibly know?.. Oh well, probably not Jack, sorta has an alibi for one murder, but….
I'm fascinated with the Victorian era... have been ever since I started reading Sherlock Holmes. My other favorites are the Middle Ages, the Regency era, the Twenties and the sixties!👍
Very well presented. Indeed, of all the serial killers before & since Jack the Ripper, his spree stands out from them all. He will most likely be the one that forever haunts us.
Queen Victoria herself Blamed the London Metropolitan Policemen for not being able to catch & arrest Jack the Ripper. He was never cought in the act. One Major - Difficulty with catching criminals, was that many police forces suffered from a lack of transport, Police as a role walked, upwards of 20 miles a day in some cases.
What if the ripper hated these women because he got syphillis or another std and that's why he did it? Also, maybe he died and that's why it stopped. It makes no sense that he'd just stop
Good work I enjoyed Victorian era but I do agree it has been glorified I sure wouldn't like to live through it I think how lucky we are to live in 21st Century.
While I agree that the Shawl is likely not absolutely DNA proof that Aaron Kosminski was in fact Jack The Ripper, it has to be either A Coincidence that the killings stopped when he was Institutionalized, but it's A Plus, at the very least, that The Correlation exists. I would give him My Vote, of all of the men that were Suspects
If Lechmere wasnt the killer, then why were the cuts on Nichols body concealed? It would have made sense to just leave her for Lechmere and Paul to find, like he did with the others. Also if Lechmere was actually going to work he would have a cast iron reason to be up in the early hours of the morning that could be verified by his employer.
Fun fact: The Pinchin street torso was found under the railway arch, 2 doors down from Charles Lechmere's mother Maria's house on Pinchin Street. Liz Stride's murder scene on Berner Street was literally around the corner from Pinchin Street. Maria lived there at the time both bodies were found. Lechmere grew up on Thomas Street, and the street was later named Pinchin.
your all over Y T and telling silly lies bout me - shame on you - silly person . " fun fact " have you heard of Will Hay Great British comedian made films 30ts 40ts you might like em - Fun jtr - ???
The only logical reason the mutilations were concealed was because the killer decided not to flee (a civilian coming from one direction, and probably police on beats in the other direction) and instead to bluff it out, hoping it wouldn't be evident what happened to Polly for the time being.
Liked this video . I'm American , and have been studying this case fanatically , for over 22 years !!!. I won't go into a huge amount of detail now , but MY BEST TOP SUSPECT IS EASILY JAMES KELLY , whom you mentioned , THANK GOD !!. PENNY FOR PENNY , POUND FOR POUND , NOBODY CAN BEAT JAMES KELLY , as having been the SUPER ELUSIVE " JACK THE RIPPER " !!!. Study up on him , I THINK YOU MIGHT AGREE!!!. IN WHITECHAPEL , LONDON , AND ALL OVER AMERICA TOO , FOR YEARS AFTERWARDS , JAMES KELLY LOOKS HARD TO DENY , AS A VERY , VERY , VERY , REAL POSSIBILITY!!!.
Why do you think the killer took some of the victims organs? These may have not been just “trophies” as he would have known that these organs would have went bad fairly quickly unless preserved. If preserved, how many men would have known and or had access to the materials to preserve the organs, and a place to store them without being questioned by family, friends etc? There was another serial killer who removed organs and ironically enough, had removed the uterus and would chew on it. His name was Andrei Chikatilo. I’m sure many of you have heard of a guy named Jeffery Dahmer. An American homosexual serial killer and cannibal. Dahmer, much like saucy ole Jack, we’re both sexually motivated serial killers. Dahmer ate parts of his victims because this gave him the most dominant power over them, and put them somewhere in his mind that they could never leave him. Perhaps Jack was somewhat similar to Dahmer in this perspective. Or, perhaps Jack did have access to materials to preserve the victims organs somewhere to hide them where people wouldn’t question it. But to assume this, could be assuming that Jack could have had some form of medical training in his past. Perhaps not a doctor, but a man that had some medical knowledge.
wow the subject on history class is jakc the ripper on my school now and this is so good... i watched multiple documentaries about jack the ripper and even a documentarie on jill the ripper but this has given me wayyyyyyyy more info on jack then all of those documentaries combined....... love it. keep making videos- mrraggdol a youtuber with 0 subscribers
1:11:37 one female serial killer who killed strangers as well as her own daughter and she did it for sexual gains is Rose West. Rose West was quite a unique individual
Mr Decades, Sir Very great script. Fried it and ate it. It was very nice. I may send you my subscription to your channel, if you only wait a while longer. Signed Do more videos on the subject when you can, Mister Decades
In my opinion, Charles Lechmere is the most likely suspect. He was a local man, knew the area well, lived there his whole life, he "found" one the victims (so hes the only suspect definitely linked to a single crime scene), all the murders happened on his route to work amd around the time he would have been on his way to work. It all fits.
@@ehgore1978 Eh i can't fully get behind it tbh. Imagine this, the person who did it was SOOO far fucking gone that he butchered a woman to the very bone and took all her skin off and all her insides, took her heart. Lechmere still lived 30 years afterwards with family. If it was really him you ain't telling me he never showed any violence towards friends or family during before or after his killings. Nobody close to him ever said anything about him being violent, let alone skin a person to the bone like a pac of rabid dogs attacked. It just does not sound believable to me, all because he was seen at the first murder? Sure it is suspicious but it does not equal him being guilty of being the ripper. The ripper was either a human who loved to rip woman to pieces or was mentally completely gone. Charles was neither. If anybody of the named suspects was it then look for someone who either died shortly after or got put in a mental institution. Fans of the Charles theory are picking the 1 who probably lived the longest afterwards and had no criminal/violent history. makes no sense to me
@ehgore1978 Cross left home at 3.30 look at Harriet Lily statement Cross was at work when Annie was killed Stride not Ripper nothing linked his mo Eddows was killed out of his way home room his mothere (but there's no evidence he was there) Kelly was killed on a public holiday so he wasn't at work Now where the proofb
52:53 Anakin Skywalker? I don't think so. Anakin never had the patience or restraint to kill only one person at a time. He'd have left a bloody murder trail all over the streets and long unexplainable gashes in the sides of the buildings.
I wonder which name they wrote... _"Remarkably, one person who did attempt to solve the Ripper murders was Dr Joseph Bell. Aided by a friend, Bell scrutinised the Scotland Yard suspects and some of his own. He and his friend worked towards their separate conclusions; then each wrote down the name of the person they suspected, and exchanged papers. As Bell noted, 'When two men set out to investigate a crime mystery, it is where their researches intersect that we have a result.' When they opened their papers, both men had the same name. They presented their findings to Scotland Yard - and the murders ended a week later. Unfortunately, their results have never been made public."_
I wonder if a recreation could be done for the Quest 2, I wouldn't watch it myself, The images would be too horrific for me to watch, I don't even think I can listen to all of this, I suffer with CPTSD from getting attacked by horrible people with Knives, But for people who enjoy the horror and gore, Do the recreation for the Quest 2 VR headset, Never know something might come up showing you who it would of been, After all when you can see the crime scene, It gives you clues to solve the disgusting act of murder, Yeah you could even set up detective things for the Quest 2, I bet there is already things for the Quest 2 where you can be a detective, VR is amazing, I am hoping it can help with the Anxiety, As Sim racing can help me with the Anxiety, I don't want pills anymore, So anyone suffering mental health and you can, Grab a quest 2, You will find lots of apps that can help you create a hobby by way of VR..... I really don't think I can listen to much, I am soz, Just the details is a bit deep, I think it can be too much of a trigger, You done a great video though.....
Jack The Ripper was Francis Tumblety. I always thought it was him and i did more research. After he went back to New York the murders in London stopped. Then i thought, how come he didn't kill women in New York why did he only do it in London? but after some reading i realised that he did in fact kill in New York as well . But nobody is talking about it. One of his victims? Carrie Brown , died 1891, New York , prostitute , murdered and mutilated. All these youtube videos and nobody says anything about it. To me it's pretty clear as to who Jack The Ripper was.
One thing that I feel is maybe inaccurate/misunderstood, he probably wasn’t super knowledgeable when it came to anatomy, there’s speculation that he might have been a doctor or some such. When I believe medical experts at the time felt that the suspect likely had some knowledge based on the state of the victims; I’m not sure why there seems to be this misconception he was some master with a scalpel. Especially given the state of his last victim. I mean even his name suggests the brutality, he wasn’t called Jack the Ripper for nothing. I personally think the surgeon angle is a result of false reporting of the media at the time.
I also think tabram was very likely a ripper victim. I think the experience of killing her, and realising how many times he had to stab her to kill her made him change his MO. It was too dangerous to allow them a chance to scream out etc, so he killed them quicker. Ppl are often surprised by how many times you can stab someone before they die. They will obviously die later on but he couldn't leave any able to speak out or witness anything.
@@mathewlawton1362 I think she probably was. It seems a big coincidence that he would also strike within an hour on the same night. I think the odds of their being two different killers who cut the throats of women both killing within 30mins-an hour of each other, and within a short walking distance, it seems highly unlikely to me. It's possible but if I had to put money on it I'd say they were the same killer.
@@mathewlawton1362 if it was a group enterprise she could also have been used as a distraction while he went after Eddows. After all Eddows had just been released from a police station where she had been making claims she knew who the killer was and was interested in the reward. If there was high level corruption involved then it would explain why Eddows was targeted and not in Whitechapel either.
@mrdarren1045 He was interrupted and about to be caught. I believe she's a Ripper victim. She literally lived around the corner from Charles Allen Lechmere's mother Maria. Catherine Eddowes coincidentally was murdered on what would have been Lechmere's exact walk back to his house.
One of the reasons why this case was never solved is because most of the victims were both poor and prostitutes; if the victims were of higher classes, I believe they would have found this person!😒
Good overview of known facts while cautioning against the later sensational claims to have solved the case. As you point out, many are clearly hoaxes and others lack credible links between their supposed evidence and the murder scenes. “We don’t know” often is the most appropriate conclusion with the available evidence, but it’s difficult for some people to accept, whether talking about history or science.
I believe that the From Hell letter is more likely to be a genuine letter from the killer than any of the others.
Lemmino has the best video on the subject with an insane amount of production quality and writing.. But idk it's been dismissed for decades as non canon, it may be cool but they seem convinced it isn't real
@KaladinVegapunk No. "The Missing Evidence:Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel is the best documentary by far.
@@KaladinVegapunk"The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel. Best documentary by far.
Somehow this was one of the best overall coverings of the ripper that I've seen. I also really enjoyed the fact that you included both the suspects in which I truly believe were very likely to be the ripper; David Cohen & Jacob Levy.
Much appreciated!
Leaving Charles Allen Lechmere out as a suspect is criminal in itself.
Other than him being near the crime scene near the time of one of the deaths, everything else is speculation. Also one thing that is almost always agreed upon is the fact that someone with the MO of JTR would never have stopped killing, unless he was stopped (killed/captured), Lechmere died of old age decades after the killings. He gets no more than a 5/10. @@walkawaycat431
No evidence for either. Charles Lechmere was the ONLY suspect to have been seen by someone else lingering alone and acting suspiciously right next to the body of one of the victims at or near the time of death and with nobody else in sight or sound.
i agree with you..
Jack the ripper was a monster but a deadly and well educated monster the worst kind of enemy
Knowing who he was would only spawn more questions - why was he way he was, what were his reasons for what he did? Only justice we can do to the victims is by helping out people in need and do what we can in our own communities to prevent conditions like those in London back in the days ever being present anywhere else, since those were to blame in equal manner as the killer himself.
"THE FIVE" IS GREAT BOOK ON VICTIM'S LIVES👍
Hey double commercials now 😂
One of the most fascinating crimes in history. Thank you for presenting this interesting topic to us in all its facets.
I did one of the ripper tours about 6 years ago, it was good. Very creepy because it was at night though!
perhaps,daytime,next time.............................
@@manchild3479 An ellipsis is only 3 dots...
This video is better formatter than many professionally made documentaries, such as the history channels documentary on Jack. Outstanding job
Thank you very much
Formatted better? 🤔
@@alkohallick2901 oh stop with the Grammer nit picking. Those people are like the HOA, useless and annoying.
@@Styxswimmer "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel.
@walkawaycat431 seen it. Many times.
If youre ever in London, I highly advice you to do one of the ripper tours! When I did it, we had a guide who was an actor as well and did an amazing job in telling the story on the locations in Whitechapel. The museum near dock street is cool as well, but a bit expensive and its better/helpfull when you already know a lot of things about the murders.
Yeah I've always wanted to do a tour down in Whitechapel and actually get an on-the-ground feel for it. If I'm ever in the area, I absolutely will!
Is it scary??
I have seen it bro 💀💀🙌🏻
Would love too
@@viviananaya6892YES. I loved going on the tour, mind you I wouldn't take your kids lol and at the time I had a six month old so hubby stayed with her while I went with my sister. It was a must see while you're in London. My Mother was born in Whitechapel so it was eerie for her.
The one thing that always irks me with Ripper documentaries is that they always tend to focus on the killer, whilst casting his victims in a negative light, labeling them as prostitutes. They never tell us anything about the hardships the Canonical Five went through, the struggles that Victorian London placed on them. They ended up in the Whitechapel district because life had torn any chance of them dealing with their struggles away from them. Yet they are only remembered because of their murderer.
Jack the Ripper took the lives of five innocent women. Their voices were forever silenced on a cold, autumn night. They are remembered, not as complex human beings, but as mangled corpses left behind by the hand of a madman.
There was nothing extraordinary about Jack that warranted the fame he has now. He was simply in the wrong place at the right time. And five women paid the price with their lives. Decades later, their graves have been left to deteriorate.
They deserve to be remembered. It doesn't matter what they were in life, they were human beings, and they deserve to be treated with more respect.
5 women? Martha Turner Tabram was also his victim. What no one seems to understand is WHY he killed. But if you look at the evidence it is not difficult to understand.
Those women were also at the wrong place at the wrong time. 75k population only 1200 prostitutes? Yeah, life was bad back then, but they still chose the easy way out. at least hard work would've kept them a little safer.There are books, and documentaries on the women and sorry, they just aren't interesting.what the ripoer did is interesting because of the inhuman nature of the crimes. What made him do this and why did he stop! Serial killers don't usually do that. the women had tough live, drank, whored themselves out, it's society's fault, blah, blah, blah. Are you also asking for Dahmer's victims to be remembered too? Cus no one cares. Again, you okay stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
@@ladysnowblood You think they prostituted themselves as it was the easy way out? It was the last resort for many of these women, there was not enough work for all the people who lived there, especially women. Plus not all the rippers victims were prostitutes. And yes Dahmer's victims are remembered.
That’s why I made the effort to visit one if the victim’s, Elizabeth Stride’s, gravesite on a recent trip to London.
@@henochparksMutilated the stomach area because he didn't want prostitutes to have children.
The Victorian era was the MOST depressing century. Queen Victoria was an animal! She treated normal people with utter disdain!
I think any Era was depressing, with wars, disease, and public execution being normalized
She never washed for years as well thinking it would bring her closer to God. Bat crap crazy
@@HdHd-hp6qz That is utter crap.
I turned this on for an hour and a half of background noise and wound up subscribing to the channel because so much information in this was new to me and i’ve read 2 Ripper books written with in the last few years which made me believe i was up-to date, excellent work.
Much appreciated!
It’s very interesting, those poor women how they suffered by the evil Jack the Ripper, thanks for this
Could have been worse. At least they were dead before he mutilated them
@@jakebutler1863 Exactly, he ended them in a painful but quick death, and took their organs when they were dead. So he was quite sensible for doing that.
But it's still very bad and extremely inhumane.
I think we found him 😅
The vaginal attacks were carried out because the prince got a prostitute pregnant And caught VD as well. The palace was being bribed to hush up the pregnancy. As the palace didn’t know exactly which one he impregnated the whole bunch had to go. Hence why the vagina was torn apart so the foetus could be removed and all evidence of the unborn died and the public thought it was all a mad person killing sex workers.
@@longfadeYou're going to be my first victim ❤️👉🔪😈
I think it was Lechmere. I don't think Tabram was a victim. She was known to rob other prostitutes and it's said she was murdered as vengeance by relatives or friends of her victims. Stride was discovered by a man returning from work and he probably interrupted the crime. Kelly was possibly murdered in her home because the murderer had been almost caught at least once (Stride) and possibly twice if Lechmere was the killer. I also think all three main letters were from the killer - the one to Lusk being written whilst in a frenzied state.
That said, it could have been Kaminski, or Kosminski, but I do not think the MO fits on both counts. Kaminski fits the profile only in as much as his incarceration matches the final official victim. Kosminski would perhaps have carried on killing until incarcerated in 1891. It is difficult to truthfully say who did it. I doubt we will ever know. However, I personally think the Kelly murder was the last straw for Jack and he stopped killing afterwards. He may have tried, but the police presence maybe made it too dangerous for him. He may have also stopped (one time taking his handiwork indoors) because of City Police involvement after the Mitre Square murder. There were possibly also other would-be victims but he just never got the chance having lured the woman into a possible murder site.
Great video. But as I said. I think Lechmere did it. He's the only man discovered next to a murder victim. There's a few suspects based on people seen before the murders. But Lechmere is the only known direct contact. This alone makes him suspect number one. We don't know if he was considered a suspect because a lot of the police documents no longer exist. But he did lie about his name under oath at the inquest - and this fact alone could have seen him hung for the murders had the police been diligent enough to find out his real name. Lots of people say he never did the killings. But I have yet to see a viable reason for the synopsis. If Nichols is considered a Ripper victim, which she is, then Jack was interrupted because she was not left on display like the other victims - apart from Stride - where he was also interrupted. I find it too far fetched to imagine that Robert Paul discovered Lechmere / Cross next to Nichols' body, after Lechmere himself apparently disturbed the Ripper at work immediately beforehand. No one (Lechmere or Paul) saw somebody running off. And Lechmere's alibi, that he was walking forty odd yards ahead of Paul, does not make sense, because Paul never saw nor heard him. Lechmere could have been with Nichols for much longer than the few seconds he claimed. It has been established there is a rough distance of 100 yards between the murder site and the corner of Bucks Row, a tiny back street, where Paul subsequently entered behind Lechmere. Yet he never heard footsteps nor spotted Lechmere until approximately forty yards away from the dead body. The east side of Bucks Row is a straight road. PC Neal was able to flag down another policeman in the dark after discovering Nichols. The old school west of the murder site, along with a slight bend in the road, conceals who could have been walking toward the killer had he fleed. A policeman could have easily been walking along as he fled and alerted other officers with his whistle - besides also being armed with a truncheon to apprehend the killer. So I think Lechmere decided in a split second to face Paul and pretend he discovered Nichols dead body. Both the killer and prostitutes knew the time of the police rounds or beats, or prostitutes certainly did, because the women did not want to get caught with a man and fined for the crime. So when Cross and Paul went to find a policeman, PC Mizen, withholding their names, Cross presumably doing the talking, he said "you're wanted by a policeman in Bucks Row" knowing another copper would discover the corpse soon after killing Nichols. There is dispute about what was said to Mizen. But Mizen could not even recall that Robert Paul was there until prompted at the inquest. And it was Cross who discovered Nichols. So it would not make sense for Paul to speak to MIzen. Lechmere must of done all the talking. Paul might have even been stood across the road - given that Mizen did not even recall his presence. And both men then left Mizen - despite the fact that Nichols was presumably dead. It is said that Paul felt a heartbeat. This presumably means he thought she was dead or close to death. Paul wanted to sit Nichols up - which would determine whether or not she was alive or dead - and also show the neck wound. And Cross said no leave her. Or he would not help Paul. This was Robert Paul's testimony at the inquest. I think he might have suspected Lechmere but did not want to get murdered right next to Nichols. It is said Paul had a problem with the police. He went to the press behind their back after all. Yet the police were saying Neal found the body and were angry about Paul giving his version of events to the press. But almost everyone probably distrusted the police. And why did Mizen not speak out about the two men who failed to give their names to him. Or he failed to take their names, and perhaps treat the incident as a serious one, based on what he was told by Lechmere, who said she was either drunk or dead, playing down the seriousness of the issue, and allowing them to go on to work without being apprehended by Mizen. After all, had Nichols not been dead, and had Neal not discovered the body, that would mean that Mizen would have to walk the five hundred or so yards down Bucks Row searching for a woman in the dark who had possibly been drunk and got up and walked away after being disturbed from her drunken stupor by Cross and Paul. Ergo, Mizen must of been told another officer was present, so he could pinpoint the scene of the incident, without having to do it himself on a long dark road with lots of side alleys etc etc for an hour or more of his time. Cross must of told him another officer was present. And so he must of known that Neal or some officer would find Nichols after 03.45 am or thereabouts after he and Paul left her. Because as I said - the prostitutes knew the approximate police beat times - as did the killer - for his own means of escape.
It also took Lechmere three days, and a news story given by Paul on the Sunday, to come forward and present himself - as Cross - to the police. Cross worked at Pickfords, en route via most of the murder victims, as a delivery man of meat for local butchers and other establishments such as restaurants. These delivery (cart) men carried knives and wore leather aprons. They were also sometimes covered in blood from the animal carcasses. He could of committed the murders either on his way to work, or during work whilst waiting for meat to be unloaded from the cart, which apparently took a bit of time, as in up to thirty minutes or more. Plus the time of death might be slightly incorrect. One neighbour said they heard Chapman cry out, whilst another said he did not see her dead body around 05.00am, but they could both be incorrect. Lechmere might have murdered Chapman around the same time, 03.30am - 03.40 am, as he (possibly) did Nichols. The fact his birth name was not discovered for well over a hundred years itself speaks volumes. Some people say he used the name Cross. But he used the name Lechmere on his marriage certificate, and on his landlord rent arrangements, and his death certificate also cites Lechmere. He only used the name Cross whilst giving evidence regarding Nichols, at his work place for some reason, and when he accidentally killed a kid with his cart in 1876. Lechmere was his name in all other circumstances as far as we know - except for when he was a child and his mother took the name Cross. It sounds like he reverted to Lechmere as an adult - except on those three occasions.
It's also very interesting that both men left Mizen on their way to work and walked straight passed Annie Chapman's murder site just eight days later. Whilst if Lechmere had not walked with Paul along Hanbury street, walking passed Chapman's murder cite, and instead took the left fork down Wentworth Street - in direct view of Mizen - he would have walked right passed Martha Tabrams murder site from three weeks earlier - perhaps alerting Mizen - who may have called him or both men back. Chapman was then murdered before the inquest in Nichols' murder was not completed - taking the pressure off Lechmere via another horrific homicide and the realization that a serial killer was murdering prostitutes in the area.
This video was great, I hope it gets a lot more attention.
All in good time
I feel theres a higher possibility of the " From Hell " note being real. The Ripper signed letters seem to extreme.
*too
You can't get more British than a pub called the frying pan lol
Arguably the most British pub name is The Cock.
@@DecadesVideosI thought it was “The Cat & Fiddle?”
@@DecadesVideos Cock and Bull?
The Red lion
This case is fascinating to me, same as Black Dahlia. 🙂
Dr. Hodel
@@harcomou8395 Charles Allen Lechmere
Look at it through the eyes of Freemasons. ruclips.net/video/VxJh_HAMx34/видео.html
@@harcomou8395No. George Knowlton.
@@harcomou8395I believe that he was related to the crime in some way. He ran with some pretty demented people in Hollywood.
I do believe it is possible Tabram was the very first murder from Jack, being the first murder irs possible Jack was still figuring out how he would kill people.
Like a new guitarist learning the F bar chord.
Charles Lechmere walked close by that spot on his way to work, and at a similar time.
kosminski was the killer.lechmere was just a bystander.@@lyndoncmp5751
dose not prove anything..@@lyndoncmp5751
@lyndoncmp5751 can any of you lechmere theorists place him at the scene of Martha's death at the time the crime was committed?
I’ve always been intrigued by Druitt.. What “personal information “ did his family pass along to Scotland Yard..
There’s no real evidence against any of the suspects, but that detail has always intrigued me?.. What did his family say, or possibly know?..
Oh well, probably not Jack, sorta has an alibi for one murder, but….
You're on the right train of thinking, imo
I'm fascinated with the Victorian era... have been ever since I started reading Sherlock Holmes. My other favorites are the Middle Ages, the Regency era, the Twenties and the sixties!👍
Wow...my grandfather was a boy when these happened. Freaky.
How old are you then
I was once married to one of Frederick Deeming’s relatives, it was appalling the murders that he committed
Very well presented. Indeed, of all the serial killers before & since Jack the Ripper, his spree stands out from them all. He will most likely be the one that forever haunts us.
Well done. Jack The Ripper is the ultimate who done it.
Queen Victoria herself Blamed the London Metropolitan Policemen for not being able to catch & arrest Jack the Ripper.
He was never cought in the act.
One Major - Difficulty with catching criminals, was that many police forces suffered from a lack of transport, Police as a role walked, upwards of 20 miles a day in some cases.
I'm glad you mentioned PC Sagar's suspect.
What do Winnie the Pooh and Jack the Ripper have in common?
The Same middle name.
The is not a noun so you are wrong unfortunately
@@HdHd-hp6qz no shit.
you mentioned both of them in a crappy youtube comment section?
😂
Whoo...I am impressed.
Imagine working or living in the street where one of these murders happened 😔 I'd be so creeped out
Would ya?
The Ripper was Maybrick folks… Proven… Fact…
CASE CLOSED
Yeah but it absolutely hasn't.
What a miserable life the poor londoners lived there in white castle. Then it got real bad
What if the ripper hated these women because he got syphillis or another std and that's why he did it? Also, maybe he died and that's why it stopped. It makes no sense that he'd just stop
The murders stopped because the police had Kosminski watched 24/7...It was the only thing they could do at the time
According to certain police officers who knew who he was, he was arrested shortly after the last victim and died in an asylum in 1901
Good work I enjoyed Victorian era but I do agree it has been glorified I sure wouldn't like to live through it I think how lucky we are to live in 21st Century.
The torso murders were more horrific but didn't get the same publicity
Jack was led by the media. If newspapers and the police didn't make it in the media, Jack would've been forgotten
I have always thought Jack the ripper was a woman. A mid-wife covered in blood would not an unusual sight at that time.
Great podcast, thank you ❤
Well researched and an excellent presentation.
While I agree that the Shawl is likely not absolutely DNA proof that Aaron Kosminski was in fact Jack The Ripper, it has to be either A Coincidence that the killings stopped when he was Institutionalized, but it's A Plus, at the very least, that The Correlation exists. I would give him My Vote, of all of the men that were Suspects
Aaron was institutionalized in 1891 not in 1888 when the canonical murders began and ended
*Jack the Knife*
Edmund Reed ? Hmmmmm....of Ripper Street. Historically accurate..good show
Wonderfully facinating. Keep up the great work
Dying wish, who was jack the ripper.
If Lechmere wasnt the killer, then why were the cuts on Nichols body concealed? It would have made sense to just leave her for Lechmere and Paul to find, like he did with the others. Also if Lechmere was actually going to work he would have a cast iron reason to be up in the early hours of the morning that could be verified by his employer.
Exactly.
Fun fact: The Pinchin street torso was found under the railway arch, 2 doors down from Charles Lechmere's mother Maria's house on Pinchin Street. Liz Stride's murder scene on Berner Street was literally around the corner from Pinchin Street. Maria lived there at the time both bodies were found. Lechmere grew up on Thomas Street, and the street was later named Pinchin.
your all over Y T and telling silly lies bout me - shame on you - silly person . " fun fact " have you heard of Will Hay Great British comedian made films 30ts 40ts you might like em - Fun jtr - ???
The only logical reason the mutilations were concealed was because the killer decided not to flee (a civilian coming from one direction, and probably police on beats in the other direction) and instead to bluff it out, hoping it wouldn't be evident what happened to Polly for the time being.
@@lyndoncmp5751old Cross certainly didn't know what he was doing -did she .
From the list of suspects, I'd like to hear more about the Anakin Skywalker theory...
Liked this video . I'm American , and have been studying this case fanatically , for over 22 years !!!. I won't go into a huge amount of detail now , but MY BEST TOP SUSPECT IS EASILY JAMES KELLY , whom you mentioned , THANK GOD !!. PENNY FOR PENNY , POUND FOR POUND , NOBODY CAN BEAT JAMES KELLY , as having been the SUPER ELUSIVE " JACK THE RIPPER " !!!. Study up on him , I THINK YOU MIGHT AGREE!!!. IN WHITECHAPEL , LONDON , AND ALL OVER AMERICA TOO , FOR YEARS AFTERWARDS , JAMES KELLY LOOKS HARD TO DENY , AS A VERY , VERY , VERY , REAL POSSIBILITY!!!.
Well researched video. Good coverage of the crimes but also a sympathetic view of the diabolical and grinding poverty in the east end in 1888.
Judas priest the ripper or if you like Jack the knife
Why do you think the killer took some of the victims organs? These may have not been just “trophies” as he would have known that these organs would have went bad fairly quickly unless preserved. If preserved, how many men would have known and or had access to the materials to preserve the organs, and a place to store them without being questioned by family, friends etc? There was another serial killer who removed organs and ironically enough, had removed the uterus and would chew on it. His name was Andrei Chikatilo. I’m sure many of you have heard of a guy named Jeffery Dahmer. An American homosexual serial killer and cannibal. Dahmer, much like saucy ole Jack, we’re both sexually motivated serial killers. Dahmer ate parts of his victims because this gave him the most dominant power over them, and put them somewhere in his mind that they could never leave him. Perhaps Jack was somewhat similar to Dahmer in this perspective. Or, perhaps Jack did have access to materials to preserve the victims organs somewhere to hide them where people wouldn’t question it. But to assume this, could be assuming that Jack could have had some form of medical training in his past. Perhaps not a doctor, but a man that had some medical knowledge.
Can’t wait! This case is extremely interesting to me
Kosminsky is my best guess.
Bingo!!!! Kosminsky is literally the ONLY suspect with REAL evidence against him....and when the police had him watched 24/7, the murders stopped
wow the subject on history class is jakc the ripper on my school now and this is so good... i watched multiple documentaries about jack the ripper and even a documentarie on jill the ripper but this has given me wayyyyyyyy more info on jack then all of those documentaries combined....... love it. keep making videos- mrraggdol a youtuber with 0 subscribers
He was out here just slashing peoole
Love the details lots of suspects I never heard of untill today great work
1:11:37 one female serial killer who killed strangers as well as her own daughter and she did it for sexual gains is Rose West. Rose West was quite a unique individual
Mr Decades,
Sir
Very great script. Fried it and ate it. It was very nice. I may send you my subscription to your channel, if you only wait a while longer.
Signed
Do more videos on the subject when you can, Mister Decades
In my opinion, Charles Lechmere is the most likely suspect. He was a local man, knew the area well, lived there his whole life, he "found" one the victims (so hes the only suspect definitely linked to a single crime scene), all the murders happened on his route to work amd around the time he would have been on his way to work. It all fits.
Agrree Charkes Lechmere / Charles Cross seems to be high suspect after watching other videos that go more in depth with the "first" crime scene
@@ehgore1978 Eh i can't fully get behind it tbh. Imagine this, the person who did it was SOOO far fucking gone that he butchered a woman to the very bone and took all her skin off and all her insides, took her heart. Lechmere still lived 30 years afterwards with family. If it was really him you ain't telling me he never showed any violence towards friends or family during before or after his killings. Nobody close to him ever said anything about him being violent, let alone skin a person to the bone like a pac of rabid dogs attacked.
It just does not sound believable to me, all because he was seen at the first murder? Sure it is suspicious but it does not equal him being guilty of being the ripper. The ripper was either a human who loved to rip woman to pieces or was mentally completely gone. Charles was neither. If anybody of the named suspects was it then look for someone who either died shortly after or got put in a mental institution.
Fans of the Charles theory are picking the 1 who probably lived the longest afterwards and had no criminal/violent history. makes no sense to me
@@kenzopeypers738 Did anyone ever said that Ted Bundy was violent?
@ehgore1978 Cross left home at 3.30 look at Harriet Lily statement
Cross was at work when Annie was killed
Stride not Ripper nothing linked his mo
Eddows was killed out of his way home room his mothere (but there's no evidence he was there)
Kelly was killed on a public holiday so he wasn't at work
Now where the proofb
Yes most serial killers do their crimes on the way to work. 😐
Fell asleep to this 😭
I have seen this film as a child in my Oxford english lessons. At the scool.
52:53 Anakin Skywalker? I don't think so. Anakin never had the patience or restraint to kill only one person at a time. He'd have left a bloody murder trail all over the streets and long unexplainable gashes in the sides of the buildings.
Thank you great presentation
Why is Anakin Skywalker there?
I wonder which name they wrote...
_"Remarkably, one person who did attempt to solve the Ripper murders was Dr Joseph Bell. Aided by a friend, Bell scrutinised the Scotland Yard suspects and some of his own. He and his friend worked towards their separate conclusions; then each wrote down the name of the person they suspected, and exchanged papers. As Bell noted, 'When two men set out to investigate a crime mystery, it is where their researches intersect that we have a result.' When they opened their papers, both men had the same name. They presented their findings to Scotland Yard - and the murders ended a week later. Unfortunately, their results have never been made public."_
Anakin Skywalker haha
You didn't have the modern techniques and equipment, you had to catch them in the act
I wonder if a recreation could be done for the Quest 2, I wouldn't watch it myself, The images would be too horrific for me to watch, I don't even think I can listen to all of this, I suffer with CPTSD from getting attacked by horrible people with Knives, But for people who enjoy the horror and gore, Do the recreation for the Quest 2 VR headset, Never know something might come up showing you who it would of been, After all when you can see the crime scene, It gives you clues to solve the disgusting act of murder, Yeah you could even set up detective things for the Quest 2, I bet there is already things for the Quest 2 where you can be a detective, VR is amazing, I am hoping it can help with the Anxiety, As Sim racing can help me with the Anxiety, I don't want pills anymore, So anyone suffering mental health and you can, Grab a quest 2, You will find lots of apps that can help you create a hobby by way of VR.....
I really don't think I can listen to much, I am soz, Just the details is a bit deep, I think it can be too much of a trigger, You done a great video though.....
Thanks!
He probably has inspired copycats. See "World's Most Evil Killers".
Jack The Ripper was Francis Tumblety. I always thought it was him and i did more research. After he went back to New York the murders in London stopped. Then i thought, how come he didn't kill women in New York why did he only do it in London? but after some reading i realised that he did in fact kill in New York as well . But nobody is talking about it. One of his victims? Carrie Brown , died 1891, New York , prostitute , murdered and mutilated. All these youtube videos and nobody says anything about it. To me it's pretty clear as to who Jack The Ripper was.
One thing that I feel is maybe inaccurate/misunderstood, he probably wasn’t super knowledgeable when it came to anatomy, there’s speculation that he might have been a doctor or some such. When I believe medical experts at the time felt that the suspect likely had some knowledge based on the state of the victims; I’m not sure why there seems to be this misconception he was some master with a scalpel. Especially given the state of his last victim. I mean even his name suggests the brutality, he wasn’t called Jack the Ripper for nothing. I personally think the surgeon angle is a result of false reporting of the media at the time.
He’s probably rotting in hell
I also think tabram was very likely a ripper victim. I think the experience of killing her, and realising how many times he had to stab her to kill her made him change his MO. It was too dangerous to allow them a chance to scream out etc, so he killed them quicker. Ppl are often surprised by how many times you can stab someone before they die. They will obviously die later on but he couldn't leave any able to speak out or witness anything.
Do you think that Elizabeth Stride is a Ripper victim, she wasn't strangled the cut n knife used were different
@@mathewlawton1362 I think she probably was. It seems a big coincidence that he would also strike within an hour on the same night. I think the odds of their being two different killers who cut the throats of women both killing within 30mins-an hour of each other, and within a short walking distance, it seems highly unlikely to me. It's possible but if I had to put money on it I'd say they were the same killer.
@@mathewlawton1362 if it was a group enterprise she could also have been used as a distraction while he went after Eddows. After all Eddows had just been released from a police station where she had been making claims she knew who the killer was and was interested in the reward. If there was high level corruption involved then it would explain why Eddows was targeted and not in Whitechapel either.
Martha Tabram was murdered on Charles Allen Lechmere's new route to work. He had just moved to 22 Doveton Street less than 2 months before.
@mrdarren1045 He was interrupted and about to be caught. I believe she's a Ripper victim. She literally lived around the corner from Charles Allen Lechmere's mother Maria. Catherine Eddowes coincidentally was murdered on what would have been Lechmere's exact walk back to his house.
One of the reasons why this case was never solved is because most of the victims were both poor and prostitutes; if the victims were of higher classes, I believe they would have found this person!😒
Was very very sick vile person Jack the Ripper
Ya think??? lol
Great presentation I really enjoyed your video thank you for sharing
2 minutes in and already a lengthy and entirely unrelated commercial. Is this is just something you do, I'll listen to another documentary mate.
Credible witnesses all described the killer as Caucasian with red hair. A fact that Ripperologists hate to be confronted with.
Excellent documentary, never thought I would hear the phrase, silly sausage in a ripper video 😊
What about Kominsky or Kaminsky? Was he Cohen?
Anybody ever stop to think if one of the cops walking around all night was the killer
Is this the same guy who owns “Fizhy” RUclips channel? He sounds so much like him.
Aye
@@DecadesVideosCool stuff bruh. I love your content on Red Dead Redemption video game series ❤️
Jack just got up to a little tomfoolery, that cheeky prankster
Really good video lads, keep up the good work xoxo
Im more towards Francis Tumbelty or Kosminski .
I'm putting high consideration into changing my RUclips name to Saucy Jackie.
Just because
Mind you I agree Anakin could have done it
It would of been sick if back in day Jeremy bret did Jack the Ripper tours playing his Sherlock holmes character from tv series
As a fan of Jeremey Brett, I entirely agree.
Walker Jason Martinez Anthony Hernandez Anna
Great video one of the better documentaries I’ve watched
Jack the Ripper got a game why not bundy 😂😂
Okay, so I clicked on this video because I was interested, having no Idea that the narrator was fizhy. I just clicked on a random video.
Surprise!
Do they still have a letter ? In Scotland. Yard
Liked & subbed
HOLY FUCK WESTHAM??? CASPER WHERE YOU AT
its such a good and underrated video, but when i listen to it all i feel like is that he is going to start to talk about red dead
Understandable
Someone like that does not stop unless for reason he is either dead in looney bin prison
You know too much about this...I think you did it!🤔😁
You know too much about this...I think you did it!🤔😁
You know too much about this...I think you did it!🤔😁
You know too much about this...I think you did it!🤔😁
Good overview of known facts while cautioning against the later sensational claims to have solved the case. As you point out, many are clearly hoaxes and others lack credible links between their supposed evidence and the murder scenes. “We don’t know” often is the most appropriate conclusion with the available evidence, but it’s difficult for some people to accept, whether talking about history or science.
Yeah, it's why I didn't want to weigh in with bias on the suspect aspect, too. We simply don't know from the perspective of history.
@DecadesVideos Have you watched "The Missing Evidence: Jack the Ripper?""
@@walkawaycat431i have. i also read Christer Holmgren’s book “cutting point”. the ripper and thames torso murderer is Lechmere.
@@MEME-qe4ze I agree.