Testing people with Rabi'e is just practical trick, to increase the extremism and loyalty among the group itself, and exalting their sheikh like some Sufis do.. a vicious trick I would say.
"A stark reminder: True insight is needed in these troubled times. Beware of those who boast and seek worldly gain through the deeds of the hereafter. Knowledge should be a path to righteousness, not wealth. 📚💫 #TrueInsight #KnowledgeIsVirtue"
You can say whatever you want but Sheikh Usama is very nuanced when it comes to this issues I never heard him talking strict and harsh may Allah bless him
Some ulema can be used as an extension of principles as long as they do not violet it. But, the madkhalis use their ulema despite their double standards.
I started distancing myself from salafism after seeing the so called salafis today. They didn't bring anything to the Ummah except terrorism, destruction and disunity among the Ummah
Allah ta Ala tells us that if we differ amongst ourselves return back to Allah and His Messenger if we truly believe in Allah and the last day.....Not Rabee3 al Madkhali or anyones else for that matter. It's reported that Ali (ra) said "the truth isn't known by the people, Know the truth, then you will know the people of the truth." We as muslims need to return to educating ourselves with the Qur'an and Sunnah. We need to study the Seerah of Rusulallah (sulallahu alayhi wa salam) and take from those scholars who bring us clear evidences and proofs from the Devine Revelation.
Why doesn't Shamsi and these brothers spend their time and energy refuting the likes of Rasheed Hamami instead???... Why dedicate their whole lives to attaching practicing believers and causing division? Also, why don't they address more critical issues such as what our children are now experiencing in Western schools? Doesn't he live in the UK? Or is the king there his waliyul amr, so he's keeping quiet.
Because that is the moto of madkhalis. Keep ummah divided and obedient to their specific rulers. If you see any live video of madkhalis, their followers are only interested in ‘what do you think about this person or that person’ and then madkhalis love calling them innovators or kharijis
The reason i won't get into their majilis anymore cause they're describe themselves like defeated mentality people.. I love sirah nabawiyah story about how prophet and his sahabah are very exited about amar ma'ruf nahi mungkar..problem with their majilis they told us to be like bootlikers and quieters.
Teacher Abu Khadeejah - student Shamsi Teacher Sheikh Muhammed from speakers corner - student Ali Dawah Teacher Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan - student Dawah man Imran Ibn Mansur Shamsi, Ali Dawah and Dawah man all 3 differ yet believe in one source. This is an example of what I see. All are Salafi they all believe in Bukhari, Tirmidi, Imam Ahmed, Ibn Majah, Abu Dawood (ra) to all. Yet they all differ over these one sources or any other for example Bukhari a one source one writing one collection. Why is there still a difference? If for example it's a hadith they differ 2 or more in Bukhari why is that the case? Why then can't anyone take out these hadith then to be looked into in great detail by Ulema even the student of knowledge can take the hadith to them and get it analysed there has to be 1 correct it can't be 2 or more opinions that are correct so then which ever one is correct then Ulemah (scholars) should say OK I change my opinion to the most authentic one. Then this way we can unite upon 1. Now it's not a matter of Abu Khadeejah way is correct or Ali Dawah it's about Quran and Sunnah so if you have to now sit with Abu Khadeejah you have to or Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan. I believe there should a break down of what the core difference is in the Salaf us saliheen and those to in detail looked into If needed lie I said to be taken directly to teh scholars on each side. I'm confused what is the core difference and how is it to be sorted out InshaAllah. Allah Hu Alam Barakallahu feek.
@@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yjscholars of sunnah according to you guys are only hanbali scholars from mainly the Hejaz and some nearby areas of the Arabian peninsula?
May Allaah increase the reach of this channel and make it in its millions . Ameen. Spubs are a cancer to this ummah. Splitting up the Muslims everywhere.
It's sad that apart from Sh. Usama there is not one person among those he is refuting a scholar or even a taalib ilm! They are all jaahils, that is why the dawa scene is in the mess it is in today! End of times!
Can you please state which contemporary scholar said that testing the people with Imam's is not permissible ?? Shaykh Ahmad an najmi stated that testing the people with shaykh rabee is allowed because the salaf did it. You people honestly want to water down the manhaj ! Furthermore, the books of aqeedah clearly state that testing the people with names is from our creed.
Thank you for exposing your level of stupidity. Read some books on aqeedah with the comments of the ulama....if you even take from them in the first place... Sharhu sunnah of Imam barbahari with the explanation of Salih al fawzan is a good place to start 👍@@sp-files82
Allah says to follow the prophet.. while this fool is saying you're only on the true path if you like and follow his way. Is this not another form of shirk, similar to those grave worshipers who seek the help from dead while this fool is saying you are only on the true path if you like me and follow my path. There is no difference between grave worship and those fools who are trying to revive the teaching of a dead man Abd al-Wahhab, can one be certain what Abd al-Wahhab is going through in his grave just like we say to those fools who go to seek help from the dead
About the grave worshipping; honest question: Have you ever seen a muslim worshipping a grave? I mean asking the resident of the grave to forgive his😢/her sins or asking to guide them to the siratul mustaqem or or prostrating to the grave while saying oh so and so 'you are my rabi'. Please answer honestly with yes or no - no explanation needed. Remember you will be asked Yawmul Deen.
@kiikale4650 I've never seen it, and I was one of the foremost people who used to call people grave worshipers and mushrikeen. I see forgiveness of the slander even now. Wretched and wicked are those who call the believers mushrikeen and I seek refuge from them even today.
@@yourstruly5706 Allahu Akbar - May Allah subhanahu wata'alaa, the owner of the Day of judgement accept your astaghfara and increase you in rank. Ameen.
WHERE DID THE SALAFI DAWAH GO WRONG? Answer: It is simple, Allah ta’ala has not accepted salafism, never mind salafi dawah. Everything salafism and your salafi dawah is doing isn’t it AGAINST The Quran and Sunnah.
This is a weak argument, bereft of anything of substantial merit. The principles outlined by our classical scholars regarding testing and examining individuals in matters of religious adherence, belief, and behaviour aren't bound by time. Rather, they're based on the practice of our righteous predecessors and Qurʾānic injunctions directly related to examining the conduct and methodology of individuals. These are not principles which are limited to a specific era.
Hes not speaking about era He is speaking about who is the test pertaining to Rabee is no where near the likes of Al imam ahmad Many salafi scholars have refuted him wa lilah al hamd
@@mustafaeweida5683 The principles of testing individuals regarding their adherence to the Prophetic Sunnah isn't limited to comparing contemporary scholars to the Salaf. The primary purpose is to ensure that individuals, including scholars, remain aligned upon the correct creed. As Sheikh Aḥmad Yaḥyā al-Najmī (may Allāh have mercy upon him) said: "Whomsoever agrees with someone because s/he sees that the evidence is with them, then it is not considered being in agreement with the person, per se, but it is instead seen as being in agreement with the evidence. Within the Salafi methodology upon which we [strive to] traverse, it is not a matter of following a contemporary individual in every word or fatwa that s/he utters; we regard this type of imitation as a form of partisanship and as a form of reprehensible inveterate doctrinal bias. No matter how great a scholar he may be, no matter how broad his knowledge and excellence may be, we must inevitably accept and reject his words (if it is in opposition to evidences from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah).
@@mk-ld8ih the Saudis rolled out the red carpet for that C.I.A lap dog known as Haftar . For a C.I.A trained lap dog who's mission was the control over the black gold known as oil . Bin Saud gave the order and Rabee al Madkhali issued a fatwa shortly after his visit . Each and every master has a lap dog in this case . Just imagine issuing a fatwa which is supporting a shaytan who's been trained by the C.I.A ? Just follow the trace of the master / lap dog commanding chain and everything will be clear like a waterspring .
@@mk-ld8ih Their calculation didn't included Erdogan and his drones which were fatal for Haftar's mercenaries . Turkish drones demolished the Madkhalis and saved Libya .
Imam Ahmad wasn't from the salaf, I'm not sure if Sufyan Thawri is tabiee or taba tabiee. Even if Imam Ahmad asked the question regarding Ayyub Sahtiani, it has no weight in Islam. Even amongst the Sahaba (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) only 1 has that.
@52hogg you seriously know nothing, Imam Ahmad was neither tabieen nor taba tabieen. If you've got evidence who from amongst the sahaba (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) tabieen (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) he met or studied with, I would like to see it. Many thanks. Sufyan Thawri I'm investigating, atm.
@@52hoggI think this brother is correct though. Imam ahmad is not from the salaf. He was not a sahaba, follower or a followers follower. I believe Imam Malik and Layth were from the followers followers. Meaning that only Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa of the four imams are from the salaf.
This is how students of knowledge are, it’s natural for them to speak like this about other scholars even though they might not agree with them or even like them!
@@sp-files82Well said, it is from the Adab of a Muslim with good manners not to put down fellow Muslim even if we don’t agree with their idiology. حفظه الله is a common word used by all Arabs and specially students of knowledge. نسأل الله السلامة والعافية
It is right that an intelligent person does not undervalue three [types of people]: the scholars, the rulers, and [his Muslim] brothers. Whoever undervalues the scholars will lose his afterlife, whoever undervalues the rulers will lose his worldly life, and whoever undervalues his brothers loses his good character and conduct.
Развлечения
Imam Malik said beautifully
Everyone's statements are excepted and rejected except Prophet Muhammad peace be upon on
Him
Double standard of madkhaliya is good reason to reject it.
Testing people with Rabi'e is just practical trick, to increase the extremism and loyalty among the group itself, and exalting their sheikh like some Sufis do.. a vicious trick I would say.
"A stark reminder: True insight is needed in these troubled times. Beware of those who boast and seek worldly gain through the deeds of the hereafter. Knowledge should be a path to righteousness, not wealth. 📚💫 #TrueInsight #KnowledgeIsVirtue"
You can say whatever you want but Sheikh Usama is very nuanced when it comes to this issues I never heard him talking strict and harsh may Allah bless him
How about we focus on practicing the Deen rather than manhaj-checking based on association with scholars?
Good point. Maybe the madkhalis will do that. If you don't associate with their scholars, according to them, you are khariji, or innovator.
Some ulema can be used as an extension of principles as long as they do not violet it. But, the madkhalis use their ulema despite their double standards.
May Allah Bless Sheikh Abu Usamah
Shaikh ul Park 😂
We know the Din by the Salaf Salih who are witnesses for the Umma , not by contemporaries who need the witness of the Salaf Salih .
I started distancing myself from salafism after seeing the so called salafis today. They didn't bring anything to the Ummah except terrorism, destruction and disunity among the Ummah
Allah ta Ala tells us that if we differ amongst ourselves return back to Allah and His Messenger if we truly believe in Allah and the last day.....Not Rabee3 al Madkhali or anyones else for that matter. It's reported that Ali (ra) said "the truth isn't known by the people, Know the truth, then you will know the people of the truth." We as muslims need to return to educating ourselves with the Qur'an and Sunnah. We need to study the Seerah of Rusulallah (sulallahu alayhi wa salam) and take from those scholars who bring us clear evidences and proofs from the Devine Revelation.
Why doesn't Shamsi and these brothers spend their time and energy refuting the likes of Rasheed Hamami instead???... Why dedicate their whole lives to attaching practicing believers and causing division? Also, why don't they address more critical issues such as what our children are now experiencing in Western schools? Doesn't he live in the UK? Or is the king there his waliyul amr, so he's keeping quiet.
Because that is the moto of madkhalis. Keep ummah divided and obedient to their specific rulers. If you see any live video of madkhalis, their followers are only interested in ‘what do you think about this person or that person’ and then madkhalis love calling them innovators or kharijis
Their commanders in Saudi want the destruction of political or societal aspects of Islam, as Islam is a threat to their power and corruption.
The reason i won't get into their majilis anymore cause they're describe themselves like defeated mentality people.. I love sirah nabawiyah story about how prophet and his sahabah are very exited about amar ma'ruf nahi mungkar..problem with their majilis they told us to be like bootlikers and quieters.
we can judge people as misguided for rejecting ulema individually or as a group unless good excuse.
Teacher Abu Khadeejah - student Shamsi
Teacher Sheikh Muhammed from speakers corner - student Ali Dawah
Teacher Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan - student Dawah man Imran Ibn Mansur
Shamsi, Ali Dawah and Dawah man all 3 differ yet believe in one source.
This is an example of what I see. All are Salafi they all believe in Bukhari, Tirmidi, Imam Ahmed, Ibn Majah, Abu Dawood (ra) to all.
Yet they all differ over these one sources or any other for example Bukhari a one source one writing one collection. Why is there still a difference?
If for example it's a hadith they differ 2 or more in Bukhari why is that the case?
Why then can't anyone take out these hadith then to be looked into in great detail by Ulema even the student of knowledge can take the hadith to them and get it analysed there has to be 1 correct it can't be 2 or more opinions that are correct so then which ever one is correct then Ulemah (scholars) should say OK I change my opinion to the most authentic one. Then this way we can unite upon 1. Now it's not a matter of Abu Khadeejah way is correct or Ali Dawah it's about Quran and Sunnah so if you have to now sit with Abu Khadeejah you have to or Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan.
I believe there should a break down of what the core difference is in the Salaf us saliheen and those to in detail looked into If needed lie I said to be taken directly to teh scholars on each side. I'm confused what is the core difference and how is it to be sorted out InshaAllah. Allah Hu Alam Barakallahu feek.
Shamsi defends shia
Abu khadeeja has wrongfully accused sheikh Hajoori as mubtadi'. Caused a big fitnah between salafi brothers here in Europe.
@@Qu.Z.
Stop defending shia
@@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yjscholars of sunnah according to you guys are only hanbali scholars from mainly the Hejaz and some nearby areas of the Arabian peninsula?
@@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj see this is a lie. Sheikh Fawzaan was behind him, Luhaidan, Ahmad an najmi. And many more. Subhanalah
May Allaah increase the reach of this channel and make it in its millions . Ameen. Spubs are a cancer to this ummah. Splitting up the Muslims everywhere.
Ameen Jazakhallah khair
If you associate shikhs with rabee al madkhali you are a mubtade kharji. Madkhlis mindset in a nutshell...
It's sad that apart from Sh. Usama there is not one person among those he is refuting a scholar or even a taalib ilm! They are all jaahils, that is why the dawa scene is in the mess it is in today! End of times!
why would i care what a rabbi says
Can you please state which contemporary scholar said that testing the people with Imam's is not permissible ?? Shaykh Ahmad an najmi stated that testing the people with shaykh rabee is allowed because the salaf did it. You people honestly want to water down the manhaj ! Furthermore, the books of aqeedah clearly state that testing the people with names is from our creed.
Ibn Tayymiyah RH said that!. And Ahmad An Najmee is not an authority to make those kind of statements in case you didn’t know.
Thank you for exposing your level of stupidity. Read some books on aqeedah with the comments of the ulama....if you even take from them in the first place... Sharhu sunnah of Imam barbahari with the explanation of Salih al fawzan is a good place to start 👍@@sp-files82
I dont recognise any of the scholars of salafiyya as hujja. Rather on the contrary 😅
Didn’t the khawarij set up check posts?
We test people on rabee to see if they upon bidah.
Bro you sound like a 12 year old
Allah says to follow the prophet.. while this fool is saying you're only on the true path if you like and follow his way.
Is this not another form of shirk, similar to those grave worshipers who seek the help from dead while this fool is saying you are only on the true path if you like me and follow my path.
There is no difference between grave worship and those fools who are trying to revive the teaching of a dead man Abd al-Wahhab, can one be certain what Abd al-Wahhab is going through in his grave just like we say to those fools who go to seek help from the dead
About the grave worshipping; honest question: Have you ever seen a muslim worshipping a grave? I mean asking the resident of the grave to forgive his😢/her sins or asking to guide them to the siratul mustaqem or or prostrating to the grave while saying oh so and so 'you are my rabi'. Please answer honestly with yes or no - no explanation needed. Remember you will be asked Yawmul Deen.
@kiikale4650 I've never seen it, and I was one of the foremost people who used to call people grave worshipers and mushrikeen. I see forgiveness of the slander even now. Wretched and wicked are those who call the believers mushrikeen and I seek refuge from them even today.
@@yourstruly5706 Allahu Akbar - May Allah subhanahu wata'alaa, the owner of the Day of judgement accept your astaghfara and increase you in rank. Ameen.
@@yourstruly5706you definitely haven't seen what people end up doing in rural Pakistan and even north African countries.
#Hooliganiyyah #RepulsiveAkhlaq
#Ghulw #RabeeAlmadkhali
Using the statement of the Salaf to suit your desires
The Nazis used this method
study the books of the scholars with sincerity and stop speaking out of ignorance
Sheikh ul park… y’all play too much
WHERE DID THE SALAFI DAWAH GO WRONG?
Answer:
It is simple, Allah ta’ala has not accepted salafism, never mind salafi dawah. Everything salafism and your salafi dawah is doing isn’t it AGAINST The Quran and Sunnah.
What are you talking about
This is a weak argument, bereft of anything of substantial merit. The principles outlined by our classical scholars regarding testing and examining individuals in matters of religious adherence, belief, and behaviour aren't bound by time. Rather, they're based on the practice of our righteous predecessors and Qurʾānic injunctions directly related to examining the conduct and methodology of individuals. These are not principles which are limited to a specific era.
Hes not speaking about era
He is speaking about who is the test pertaining to
Rabee is no where near the likes of Al imam ahmad
Many salafi scholars have refuted him wa lilah al hamd
@@mustafaeweida5683 The principles of testing individuals regarding their adherence to the Prophetic Sunnah isn't limited to comparing contemporary scholars to the Salaf. The primary purpose is to ensure that individuals, including scholars, remain aligned upon the correct creed.
As Sheikh Aḥmad Yaḥyā al-Najmī (may Allāh have mercy upon him) said:
"Whomsoever agrees with someone because s/he sees that the evidence is with them, then it is not considered being in agreement with the person, per se, but it is instead seen as being in agreement with the evidence. Within the Salafi methodology upon which we [strive to] traverse, it is not a matter of following a contemporary individual in every word or fatwa that s/he utters; we regard this type of imitation as a form of partisanship and as a form of reprehensible inveterate doctrinal bias. No matter how great a scholar he may be, no matter how broad his knowledge and excellence may be, we must inevitably accept and reject his words (if it is in opposition to evidences from the Qurʾān and the Sunnah).
Why do madhkalis make khurooj against the MUSLIM libyan govt and support haftar? Isn't this haraam?
@@mk-ld8ih the Saudis rolled out the red carpet for that C.I.A lap dog known as Haftar . For a C.I.A trained lap dog who's mission was the control over the black gold known as oil . Bin Saud gave the order and Rabee al Madkhali issued a fatwa shortly after his visit . Each and every master has a lap dog in this case . Just imagine issuing a fatwa which is supporting a shaytan who's been trained by the C.I.A ? Just follow the trace of the master / lap dog commanding chain and everything will be clear like a waterspring .
@@mk-ld8ih Their calculation didn't included Erdogan and his drones which were fatal for Haftar's mercenaries . Turkish drones demolished the Madkhalis and saved Libya .
Imam Ahmad wasn't from the salaf, I'm not sure if Sufyan Thawri is tabiee or taba tabiee. Even if Imam Ahmad asked the question regarding Ayyub Sahtiani, it has no weight in Islam. Even amongst the Sahaba (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) only 1 has that.
Go check your sources again because you got bad information both Imams are from the Salaf.
@52hogg you seriously know nothing, Imam Ahmad was neither tabieen nor taba tabieen. If you've got evidence who from amongst the sahaba (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) tabieen (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them) he met or studied with, I would like to see it. Many thanks.
Sufyan Thawri I'm investigating, atm.
@@52hoggI think this brother is correct though. Imam ahmad is not from the salaf. He was not a sahaba, follower or a followers follower. I believe Imam Malik and Layth were from the followers followers. Meaning that only Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa of the four imams are from the salaf.
you are very wrong go seek knowledge @@yourstruly5706
No@@TheDarpaChief
I even don't like or trust people who say hafizahullah after saying rabee all madkhali. That's why I still don't trust Abu usamah
This is how students of knowledge are, it’s natural for them to speak like this about other scholars even though they might not agree with them or even like them!
@@sp-files82Well said, it is from the Adab of a Muslim with good manners not to put down fellow Muslim even if we don’t agree with their idiology. حفظه الله is a common word used by all Arabs and specially students of knowledge.
نسأل الله السلامة والعافية
It is right that an intelligent person does not undervalue three [types of people]: the scholars, the rulers, and [his Muslim] brothers. Whoever undervalues the scholars will lose his afterlife, whoever undervalues the rulers will lose his worldly life, and whoever undervalues his brothers loses his good character and conduct.
@@abdihussein1478 yea, the intelligent ones talks shi bout kafirs like the wahhabi cult.