Part 2: Symbolic Logic (WFFs & calculating truth functional statements)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025

Комментарии • 23

  • @pb5626
    @pb5626 11 лет назад +20

    Absolutely great video. I really appreciate that you don't skip those "obvious" steps. They are not so obvious for the new guys that are just learning. Thank You!

    • @teachphilosophy
      @teachphilosophy  11 лет назад

      Thanks, glad it was helpful.

    • @amurleopard51
      @amurleopard51 7 месяцев назад

      @@teachphilosophy Could Symbolic Logic be used in analysing statements made by alleged criminals during interrogation/interviewing to see if what they say is true?

  • @Hegemonicmarxism
    @Hegemonicmarxism 5 лет назад +2

    Amazingly well explained. Love your videos!

  • @36goldfinger
    @36goldfinger 11 лет назад +11

    All ur videos are awesome. RESPECT!!

  • @luluke9797
    @luluke9797 7 лет назад +5

    thank you so much for your video, this literally made me understand the whole concepts

  • @mathematics9334
    @mathematics9334 2 года назад

    Sir , very nice explanation .👍👍
    Thanks from India 🙏🙏

  • @kevinchang1371
    @kevinchang1371 5 лет назад +4

    Correct me if I am wrong, but you did not complete #5 did you?
    Otherwise loved the video. It's a pleasure to hear you reason out the steps above.

  • @VanIslandLights
    @VanIslandLights 8 лет назад +9

    I've never been to a logic class in my life but this stuff is interesting and fun as hell! Yes I'm a weird one.

    • @kruszer
      @kruszer 3 года назад +2

      It's not fun when it's a mandatory credit and you'll probably have to drop it and lose the grand you paid for it cause you're not getting anything the teacher is throwing at you

  • @Richard_is_cool
    @Richard_is_cool 7 лет назад +2

    What is the last one? My answer would be T.

  • @BillyChen91
    @BillyChen91 10 лет назад

    First thanks for your video and that's absolutely helpful for my logic class! But I do have a question here. At 3:41 on this video when you talk about 4)B triplebar Y you give an explanation on the screen saying "Triple bar is true only when both letters are true or both letters are false", but in your first video you said "F triplebar T" would also be true, so there should be another condition that the triple bar is also true when the left letter is true and right is false. So I guess this explanation therefore is incorrect, right? Thanks.

    • @ctkachuk08
      @ctkachuk08 10 лет назад

      I think you are confusing triple bar with horseshoe. For the triple bar either both must be true or both much be false. An easy way to remember is that the triple bar represents equivalence so both must be equal or the same.

    • @aarishsalmani8483
      @aarishsalmani8483 6 лет назад

      Billy Chen

  • @p.o.s.h.o.u1037
    @p.o.s.h.o.u1037 Год назад

    I love you bro

  • @moharafhossainmosa2214
    @moharafhossainmosa2214 7 лет назад

    Very helpul

  • @c.l.368
    @c.l.368 7 лет назад

    Shouldn't (P->Q) be given an undetermined truth value when P is false and Q is true?
    Surely you can't confirm that P implies Q only on the basis that Q is true.
    As a matter of fact, by this logic, (P->Q) when both P and Q are true should also have an undetermined truth value. It's only in the case when P is true and Q is false that you can definitively say the (P->Q) statement is false. Any other combination of truth values for P and Q should give undetermined truth values for (P->Q).

  • @__m-a-x__
    @__m-a-x__ 7 лет назад +5

    This is the weirdest ASMR video I've ever seen

  • @ruskodudesko9679
    @ruskodudesko9679 8 лет назад

    you should use ! for not

  • @parakrama1995
    @parakrama1995 8 лет назад

    do you like pie ?

  • @gvonmorton6885
    @gvonmorton6885 3 года назад

    who dislike this💀