Logic | Well Formed Formula (Wff)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
  • How to translate a sentence into a well formed formula of symbolic logic (or wff). In other words, logical notation or translating from English into a logical expression in a formal language, with emphasis on a well formed formula or wff.
    This is a simple introduction. For more advanced logical expressions, see the Logic Translations Playlist
    • Logic: Translations
    Note: Your textbook may use different symbols or slightly different names. It doesn't matter! Translating from English into logic will be the same, as will the rules for a well-formed formula or wff.
    Subscribe! / @letsgetlogical
    Further Reading
    Paul Herrick, Introduction to Logic, Chapter 12, “Truth-Functional Logic Version 2.0: The Invention of Formal Languages in the Nineteenth Century” (Recommended companion textbook for this channel.)
    "60 Fun Facts About Animals You Probably Didn’t Know Before"
    www.rd.com/lis...

Комментарии • 16

  • @Ripple-l4z
    @Ripple-l4z 8 месяцев назад +3

    This video summed up an hour and a half lecture that I couldn't understand a single thing of, and thanks to you it's MUCH more clear to me. Thank you for sharing your knowledge, I appreciate it a lot 🌻

  • @thedoctordowho2022
    @thedoctordowho2022 3 года назад +7

    awesome video! simple,direct and fun!

    • @LetsGetLogical
      @LetsGetLogical  3 года назад

      That's what I was going for! Thanks, Thiago jose.

  • @drunkmadala
    @drunkmadala 8 месяцев назад

    At the beginning of this video, I was confused but now everything about WFF is clear. Thank you so much.

  • @Thee_Jadex
    @Thee_Jadex Год назад +1

    the wffs make this so great

  • @maryannatwood7223
    @maryannatwood7223 4 месяца назад

    Thank you so much for presenting the "equations" of Formal Logic L:anguage in this clear fashion. The use of actrual sentences in the examples was miraculous! You have helped me to see the light...even if a dim light;-)

  • @hectorduenas9906
    @hectorduenas9906 3 года назад +4

    Really nice video, Thank You!

  • @MaenadBABE
    @MaenadBABE Год назад +2

    Thanks for this! Super helpful!

  • @wajdwael
    @wajdwael Месяц назад

    So clear thanks

  • @RIAM47
    @RIAM47 2 года назад

    Great video!

  • @maurma1973
    @maurma1973 Месяц назад

    A ^ B v C is WFF ?

  • @HurricaneEmily
    @HurricaneEmily 3 года назад +2

    I’m not sure why a or b or c isn’t a wff. From what you said, a wff has a truth value. a or b or c has a truth value regardless of grouping. If none of them is true, the entire proposition is false. If one or more of them is true, the proposition is true. Other than that, the video was straightforward and helpful.

    • @LetsGetLogical
      @LetsGetLogical  3 года назад +3

      Nearly everything you say here is correct, Emily. Except that proper syntax of a logical language *requires* grouping when there is a string of three (or more). So you’re right: it doesn’t affect the semantics. “A or B or C” is perfectly understandable and has a truth-value.
      But technically, in order to count as a _well-formed formula_ , you’d need grouping, according to the rules of grammar.

  • @Phantom-ns7fp
    @Phantom-ns7fp 2 года назад +3

    is (S^R) a WFF???

    • @LetsGetLogical
      @LetsGetLogical  2 года назад +1

      Yes. You can also drop the parentheses in this case. S ^ R is a wff. But so is (S ^ R).

    • @Phantom-ns7fp
      @Phantom-ns7fp 2 года назад

      @@LetsGetLogical Thanks a lot man