September daily videos for wedding photographers: www.taylorjacksoncourses.com/daily-september-videos These are the videos: Week 1: Mistakes That Destroy Your Business My Current Gear Lenses and Cameras for Wedding Photography How To Respond to Inquiries So You Don’t Get Ghosted Workflow Hacks The Easiest Way to Become Friends with People in the Industry Week 2: Booking 40 Weddings Per Season: An Overview What Needs to Change in Your Business to Do 40 Weddings This Tip Will Fast Track You To Becoming a Preferred Vendor Social Media Tips How I Would Be Using RUclips Right Now To Book More Weddings Week 3: Offering This Service DOUBLED My Bookings Pricing So You Don’t Lose Bookings Important Things to Mention In Your First Meeting Albums or No Albums (What I’ve Chosen) When To RAISE Your Prices Week 4: Booking More Destination Weddings Getting More Referrals What NOT To Do on Social Media How To Book THOUSANDS Of Jobs Over Your Career Creating a Business That You Don’t Hate
I'm still interested in seeing the Nikon Z 35mm f/1.2 lens, which is likely to be released this year. I love images that have that particular blurring in the background scenery, like the 85mm f/1.2 in full-body shots.
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto im at the canon side, i did my first wedding in 10 years this saturday with Great results! Just with the 24-70 rf and R5 and im hooked! But im thinking instead of getting a 85.. I might sell the 24-70 and go 50mm 1.2 and 70-200 2.8.. or are there any other good combo im missing ? 🙏
Or, like me, you could adapt the EF version. I have the first one, the 2.8-4, and when adapted to my R5, it is better than when I was using it on my 5DIV. So until Canon makes using the adapter on third party lenses unworkable, there is an option.
@@fangli They are less expensive and because of my limited budget, I bought the 2.8-4 version instead of the 2-2.8. For what I shoot, the original is fine. And, again, it works well with the adapter on my R5.
Hi Taylor, can you double check the aperture vs. focal length stats. Perhaps the flange distance is creating this discrepancy???? - Everyone keeps saying the lens is identical to the Sony....but I've seen a difference in the aperature vs focal length. Sony lens reports - 35-38mm = f/2 39-58mm = f/2.2 59-79mm = f/2.5 80-150mm = f/2.8 Nikon Z reported - Is this accurate?!? 35-39 2.0 40-74 2.1 75. 2.2 85-129 2.7 130-150 2.8 Please let us know - I can't find anything about this even on Tamron website I've also seen picture meta data with shots at 98 MM with the Nikon Z lense at F/2.7 which seem to confirm this difference. This would make this lens way more versitile for the Nikon than the Sony mount and make it a competitive relative to Canon's 28-70 f/2.0 - Your only loosing .1 - stops in that range vs up to .5 stops on the Sony!
I love my 24-120 S lens, but I often pack the 35 1.8S along with it. Tempting when this lens could replace both, but I actually like the 24-120 range more than 35-150 as well. I’ll hold off for now.
September daily videos for wedding photographers: www.taylorjacksoncourses.com/daily-september-videos
These are the videos: Week 1:
Mistakes That Destroy Your Business
My Current Gear Lenses and Cameras for Wedding Photography
How To Respond to Inquiries So You Don’t Get Ghosted
Workflow Hacks
The Easiest Way to Become Friends with People in the Industry
Week 2:
Booking 40 Weddings Per Season: An Overview
What Needs to Change in Your Business to Do 40 Weddings
This Tip Will Fast Track You To Becoming a Preferred Vendor
Social Media Tips
How I Would Be Using RUclips Right Now To Book More Weddings
Week 3:
Offering This Service DOUBLED My Bookings
Pricing So You Don’t Lose Bookings
Important Things to Mention In Your First Meeting
Albums or No Albums (What I’ve Chosen)
When To RAISE Your Prices
Week 4:
Booking More Destination Weddings
Getting More Referrals
What NOT To Do on Social Media
How To Book THOUSANDS Of Jobs Over Your Career
Creating a Business That You Don’t Hate
I would pay to see a comparison with the Nikkor Z 24-70 2.8 in terms of sharpness/color/ and video stabilization
Quote
Great to see! What camera setup are using to record this magnificent piece of filming. I am curious if it’s the 35-150 to Nikon camera. 🎥
I'm still interested in seeing the Nikon Z 35mm f/1.2 lens, which is likely to be released this year. I love images that have that particular blurring in the background scenery, like the 85mm f/1.2 in full-body shots.
Hah all I want is 1.4s. Hopefully they allow tamron to develop them but i doubt it
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto Yes, the rendering of the Tamron 35 mm f/1.4 was very nice.
When your recording wedding videos behind scenes, what small camera are you using Taylor?. In the market for a decent small camera..
I intend to purchase the DSLR Version of this lens in both Nikon and Canon mount
Just when I switched to Sony ! 😩 If sony do a straight f/2.8 version, that would be nice!
I'm hopeful they do!
witch screen recorder were using taylor?
Do you use any primes after getting this lense?
Yep. I still use a 35 for getting ready and 85 for reception
@@TaylorJacksonPhoto im at the canon side, i did my first wedding in 10 years this saturday with Great results! Just with the 24-70 rf and R5 and im hooked! But im thinking instead of getting a 85.. I might sell the 24-70 and go 50mm 1.2 and 70-200 2.8.. or are there any other good combo im missing ? 🙏
Time to switch back to Nikon Taylor
Model is so beautiful, the lens is incredible, hope to afford this,, meanwhile canon user is sitting watching sony nikon lens line up
Or, like me, you could adapt the EF version. I have the first one, the 2.8-4, and when adapted to my R5, it is better than when I was using it on my 5DIV. So until Canon makes using the adapter on third party lenses unworkable, there is an option.
at least 3rd party is cheap than the native lens like viltrox samyang sigma tamron@@DavidPavlich
@@fangli They are less expensive and because of my limited budget, I bought the 2.8-4 version instead of the 2-2.8. For what I shoot, the original is fine. And, again, it works well with the adapter on my R5.
Can I know what is that device mounted on the hotshoe? Thanks.
Atomos ninja star
Are you using the Atomos ?
Yes
panalo 😂
Hi Taylor, can you double check the aperture vs. focal length stats. Perhaps the flange distance is creating this discrepancy???? - Everyone keeps saying the lens is identical to the Sony....but I've seen a difference in the aperature vs focal length.
Sony lens reports - 35-38mm = f/2
39-58mm = f/2.2
59-79mm = f/2.5
80-150mm = f/2.8
Nikon Z reported - Is this accurate?!?
35-39 2.0
40-74 2.1
75. 2.2
85-129 2.7
130-150 2.8
Please let us know - I can't find anything about this even on Tamron website
I've also seen picture meta data with shots at 98 MM with the Nikon Z lense at F/2.7 which seem to confirm this difference.
This would make this lens way more versitile for the Nikon than the Sony mount and make it a competitive relative to Canon's 28-70 f/2.0 - Your only loosing .1 - stops in that range vs up to .5 stops on the Sony!
A 28-150 2.8 would be great also
yeah
a 14-600 f1.2 - f2.8 would be the best
20-2000 f/1.8-f/4
I can beat that: 10 - 6000 mm f/0.95 and the sensor is in the lens. But you need a truck and a crane to move the lens from one place to another.
@@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas 0-3000 mm f/.15
I love my 24-120 S lens, but I often pack the 35 1.8S along with it. Tempting when this lens could replace both, but I actually like the 24-120 range more than 35-150 as well. I’ll hold off for now.
24-120 is awesome! Much better than F mount 24-120.
I would go for 35-150 but I have 70-200 already. I am thinking of getting 14-30 or 17-28
Dumb question but can you lock it to f2 at 105mm or more?
What is it that you are using to record the screen?
Atomos ninja star
sony camera are worst to hold and very ugly too ...
Beauty lies in the beholder or rather “holder”. Everyone floats their boats differently 🛥️ 🚤 🛶