Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 vs EF-S f/2.8
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 сен 2024
- Here's the lens comparison no one asked for (JK...sort of). In all honesty I just thought comparing these 2 lenses would just be a flat out fun video, and if you've ever wondered what exactly you get when you spend over $1000 on a professional lens here ya go! The Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 vs Canon EF-S f/2.8, enjoy!
👉Check out the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 here: geni.us/Rp52Dz
👉Check out the EF 24mm f/1.4 here: geni.us/YJmxkE
📸My Camera Gear:
Main Camera (Full-Frame Mirrorless): geni.us/KT16
Secondary Camera (Canon 80D): geni.us/xjz4srA
Action Camera: geni.us/UcbQMAC
Favorite SD Card (Sandisk Extreme): geni.us/6IZZZ1
Vlogging Lens: geni.us/sJiRMlB
Favorite Lens: geni.us/5Jsow
Astrophotography Lens: geni.us/BUJ7A
Portrait Lens: geni.us/5Jsow
Telephoto Lens: geni.us/FxVz
Camera Microphone: geni.us/As22SZf
Desktop Microphone: geni.us/rDta
Favorite Light kit: geni.us/vhEbl
Video ND Filter: geni.us/IReJn
Main Vlogging Tripod: geni.us/Ktgm
Travel Tripod: geni.us/cIAmLK
Camera Stabilizer 3-Axis Gimbal: geni.us/yABF
Dope Backpack (USA GEAR SLR Bag): geni.us/iNgWUr
🎵Where I get music & sound effects for my videos. Sign up for a free 30-day trial here: share.epidemic...
🎥My 2nd Channel: / @joshwiniarski2
💻My Online Community (Discord Server): / discord
🔷My Instagram: / winiarskijosh
📧Contact me: contactjosh.winiarski@gmail.com
Some of the above links are affiliate links. There is no additional cost to you, but if you do decide to purchase a product through these links, I may receive a commission that helps fund the channel.
#canonlens #joshwiniarski #nosmallcreator
Finally someone makes a video comparing the two!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!
Nice comparison clip .. I’ve done some fun street photography in Las Vegas with my 24mm 2.8. Feels kinda rewarding knowing you’re getting cool pics with a small budget lens. Having not purchased the 24mm 1.4 I used that xtra cash and bought me a 90D with 18-135mm.:)
Boy did you deliver bud... That was a totally fun video (!) and the comparison was really interesting. I've been looking at the 24 mm (really passionate enthusiast - not pro). Hopefully I'll find it used for 2/5ths of the new price! I'll definitely stick around to see what else you're putting out!👍
For 24mm 1.4 you can buy 24mm 2.8,50 1.8,55-250 is ii or even 70-300 is usm.
You could probably get all of those for the same price haha. The 24mm f/1.4 is NOT a cheap lens by any means!
Great video. For me, in the environment I plan on shooting in, the 2.8 is better suited for my vision. I don't want the background to be as blurry, I want it to retain a good amount of clarity. I think the 24mm 2.8 and 50mm 1.8, under the right settings, are perfect for outdoor daytime/nighttime scenes.
It’s the exact question I had. Whether to buy the FF version in case I wish to upgrade to FF later. It’s a good question, not dumb.
The background blur on the 1.4 was really nice . There's definitely a way to get that background blur effect with a 2.8. (Synthetic post process) Most people put their in images on Instagram. They have a lens blur tool right there. it would give the same effect for 10 x less the price. Pump It Up one stop and you got a 1.4 photo lens blur in the background.
no chance
Even if you don't mind faking bokeh you still lose 1 stop of light, forcing you to run a higher iso.
The efs lens gets good background blur when shooting small things like mushrooms and ants lol.
good stuff, I appreciate you keeping it to the point and under 10mins
Fantastic video mate. Watched over 5 of your vids trying to decide on a high aperture lens for my 90D and subbed instantly. Legit lad🙌🏻
Great video and not a silly comparison at all. I actually owned a pancake lens and was searching to see if I should purchase the 24 to 7024 mm lens. You actually help me understand whether I should do it now or not. Thank you
Why/how did background blur become so important? Is it just the current fashion? I remember being a hobby photographer in high school (1964 - 70) when maximum depth of field was very popular because sharpness and detail were highly desirable. I remember when speedo briefs were popular. Now it's knee length baggy board shorts. Is there any objective measure of better or is it just arbitrary current fashion?
I have a rebel with an 18 to 55 kit lens. I'm wondering if this prime lens will be alot sharper than my kit lens? Thanks
yes, you were right, it was a fun video and it was interesting for me as well!
Keep like that!!
Good video, keep up these reviews
Thanks, will do!
Not a silly comparison at all. Many new to photography have no idea of first, the difference between f/2.8 and f/1.4. Or the cost difference between full frame lenses and aps-c lenses.
Too many people spend too much on their camera, and not nearly enough on their glass.
Another great comparison would be comparing pictures from an 80d and a t7. Make it fun using say the 18-55 kit lens on the 80d, and a good prime lens on the t7. Something like a 50mm f/1.8. Then you can always knock it out of the park using the 80d with a Holga vs the t7 with the kit lens.
My saying is spend more on your lenses than your camera. A cheap camera with a good lens, almost always out performs an expensive camera with a cheap lens.
Thanks for the review bro! 👍🏻
You bet!
Honestly even canon's 4k wont be able to show a sharpness difference between the lenses. Sharpness tests should be done through photos imo
I love my EF-S f/2.8.... Took some great landscape shots in Hawaii!!!!
You can definitely see a difference between both lenses! You definitely do get what you pay for.
Make more inreally loved your type of teaching and explaining and vlogging
Great comparison!
Thanks!
Thanks for video. Appreciate the info.
My pleasure!
Great video, thank you.
My pleasure!
@@JoshWiniarski May feel like a dumb question to make a video in but I was debating these 2 lenses for my 90d crop sensor. I'm going to get the L series. Your video helped with the decision.
Thanks for this one !
1:41 - That is a wondeful quote xD In some groups I do not like those Fkers speaking without extra explanation about why buy that,they just write: "buy sigma 17-50", "buy 80-200 2.8, is a lens for life", "16-35mm is an all around lens, buy it", "save a little more money and invest in a 24-70 2.8" These are nice for sure, but "little more money" that is bullshit, is quite a lot more and even though a lens could stand a life time, maybe photography will not last your own life time, you get debts, you could get different interest and throw away your gear so that fancy 16-35mm could became death space and a regretful waste of money, so thats why is wonderful to get cheaper options, get results and learn about. These 2 lenses give what you get for money. The 1.4mm is an specialiced lens to those who knows what to do, the fastest wide lens from canon. The 2.8 gives a nice value, it is the smallest and lightest lens for canon, you just can't go smaller from this point, you have to change body and that is why this is my favorite lens
Great video! You deserve a lot more subscribers. I think I’m going to get one for my M6m2
Awesome tutorial ❤️
Thanks!
Far from silly video, I was looking for this exact comparison bc I wanted to know what the extra $900+ give you over the 2.8
Great video
very nice man. you are fun. keep it that way
Thanks, will do!
Good luck on your youtube, roblox player treasure. It was nice playing with you :) I subbed btw
You are the Best! I always enjoy your videos and you have been such a great help and inspiration for me and my RUclips channel, thanks for what you do!!
Thanks so much Juan, that means a lot to hear!
Thanks for the video
Great video. What's a good lens to vlog on?
Will the Canon EF-S 24mm f2.8 STM fit onto a full Frame body like the 5D? I know it's designed for APS-C bodies, but I've read competing views as to whether it will actually fit onto a full frame body, albeit with some vignetting.
Thanks for the nice video.
Nice job. Keep it up.
Thanks will do!
such a nice and honest review, thanks man!!! I decided for Sigma now:-)
Good choice!
I'm a little bit in between this and the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM.
The Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 does not have IS, will this be a huge dealbreaker? Also, does this prime 24mm needs an adapter for the 5D III?
9:04 Damn, such nice color! Was that just straight out of the camera?
It was either straight out of camera or VERY small tweaks (just exposure and WB).
What EF-S lens do you recommend to buy first? 10-18, 24 or 55-200? I already have kit lens and 50 mm
Totally depends on what you want to shoot! You do photo, video, or both? Do you vlog, shoot portraits, shoot landscapes, make youtube videos etc.?
@@JoshWiniarski both photo and video. Thinking about starting vloging/making travel videos. Or maybe a short film. But I mostly focus on video
@@Ezdiess Right on! So if you've got an 18-55 and a 50mm, the 10-18 could be a really good option. 10mm feels CRAZY wide compared to 18mm, and if you're traveling to cool places as well as vlogging that makes it a great option. Alternatively, if you're trying to shoot anything far away like birds the 55-250mm is sweet, although you probably wouldn't use it a ton for short films. It all depends on your style, but the 10-18mm is jumping out at me the most from what you've told me. Hope this helps!
These Lenses should be made to be Dismantled so you can put collagen lens (eagle eye) with far superior optical properties than glass but Canon will not allow me to do that with the 24mm pancake Lens. Back to work F1.0 wine glasses for sale 1500 bucks each.
Would you recommend this for landscape? The 24mm I mean. I’m Looking for a lens for landscape for less than $500.
Maybe even the canon 10-18mm
@@darylmeer2318 I wouldn't really recommend either 24mm lenses for landscape. They absolutely work, they're both sharp for the price, both let in lots of light for the price, and both are reasonably compact. Personally though I've always found zoom lenses to be a lot better for landscape shooting. There's nothing worse than being at 24mm and needing 18mm, or 14mm, or even 10mm to capture everything you wanted. If I were you, I'd take a look at The Canon 10-18mm, the Canon 10-22mm, and the Sigma 17-50mm. These are all great lenses for landscape photography!
@@JoshWiniarski is crop factor applied in EF-S lenses on Apsc camera
Great video. I was planning to buy this lens, but then I bought 50 1.8 stm for learning portraits
I'd say the 50mm f/1.8 is a much better lens for learning portraits on. Still an awesome lens and WAYYYY cheaper!
Have you ever tried the 35mm IS f2 lens?
If I remember correctly I used it for like 5 shots on a short film in college? Couldn't tell you much about it but if I remember correctly it was a really loud lens if you used autofocus. Again this would have been like a year ago so it may not have even been that lens haha, sorry wish I could be more helpful!
I'm a rank beginner with a Canon T6 APSC, wondering if there's a reason to buy an APSC lens if there is an FF lens with the same focal length and aperture. Assuming a similar price that is, I might as well get the FF lens in case I ever upgrade to an FF camera, right? Also, assuming both have IS and STM, although the lighter lens might be a factor.
Full frame almost always goes for more than aps-c lenses. And aps-c lenses almost always are sharper on crop sensor cameras. However, I have found all my full frame L glass to be sharp on my crop sensor cameras, just pricey. But I didn't buy them for the crop sensor cameras, I bought them for my 5D IV.
Canon wants to move past EF and EF-S so I don't think we will see any new lenses or DSLR cameras from them. If you don't have a good camera yet, look at the R series. They have a few starter cameras in the line up now and R glass should be around for a while. If you're getting a DSLR with a crop sensor, then scarf up the lower cost aps-c lenses and enjoy the savings.
Hey...so good video.
Actually i want to buy a camera but im sooo Confused between 250d and m50. i want to use Ef-s 24 mm 2/8 too and i decided to record a clip at home for you tube.
I will be grateful
if you tell me witch camera is worth?
You should get the sl2, because the 250d/sl3 doesn’t record at 24fps and with the m50 the lenses options are going to be considerable lower than the sl2 or sl3 you’ll need a adapter to use even those two lenses that he was talking about in the video
Most cinema cameras are closer to APS-C than full frame
I like this guy 😃😂
I picked up a 24mm 2.8 and the AF is super loud. maybe I got a lemon
Dang sorry to hear that :/
You def got a 🍋. Mine’s silent af
Hey mate. I’m trying to get a background blur like you have on your vid. But don’t really have the budget. Would the 24mm 2.8 pull off that kinda look do you think?
If u can blur background and havent much money buy some old lens m42 and adapter :P U will find many good lenses but with manual focus. helios 44m 2.0, pancolar, tessar etc.
@@Mario19932 ah ok. Cheers mate. Not thought about something like that. I’ll have a look. 👍🏼👍🏼
Finally!
About time right?
all of you camera dudes talk way too much. Gott go through 20 videos to find info. Sorry man... just another frustrating video