He views the evidence with the belief that we don't have a back-story to go off of. So of course scientists with this view will find what aligns with thier belief that it must have come about naturally, randomly or some other way, anyway other than what thier ancestors taught them. Just as a creationist will find what aligns with thier belief when looking at the same data set.
Nye has zero evidence. All his "evidence" is quietly refuted given a few years. That is why I have a standing challenge to evolutionists to provide one example of evidence for Darwinian evolution that is 30 years or older, and not refuted. Never once had an example.
When asked about his belief in human life arising from natural process he simply pointed at members of the crowd stating them as evidence. Now if a Creationist were to do the same thing when asked for evidence for God's creation of man it wouldnt have flown as legitimate answer. Now Bill Nye could have provided evidence as he was asked 2-3 times throughout the tour, What ever evidence there is for human life arising through natural process it appears Bill doesn't know of it. Bills answer to the question of whether mutations have been observed producing new genetic information was quite lackluster in the evidence department, Ken Hams veiw is that observable adaptations are the result of Genetic loss (which is quite commonly observable). Once again perhaps their could be evidence but Mr Nye failed to present it. After watching the 2 hour tour I have come to the conclusion that this event should have occurred when the Ark was closed to the public. I believe all of the noise of the people in addition to the various exhibitits was too distracting for both Ham and Nye and led to many communication misshaps, the biggest being half answered questions and thoughts being left when people interjected or new exhibits were noticed. In a less distracting environment perhaps discussion could have been more fruitful in understanding these worldviews. So in my view to make the claim that Bill's worldview has no basis in faith would be untrue.
@@zaneb7113 youtube appears to be erasing your comment. I did read it. Yes, I have a standing challenge to evolutionists to give me one example of evidence for Darwinian Evolution(which is macro-evolution), that is 30 years old or older, and not refuted. No one has ever been able to do it. Their massive pile of "evidence" is refuted, and usually by pro-evolution scientists. They simply do not hold up to scrutiny or time.
if you do not understand how carbon dating works, or how a person working in that type of science could come to determine the age of a sample through isolating elements and reading data, then why would you argue for something like this?
I don’t mind the idea of Noah’s arc being an exhibit at all but why did they throw dinosaurs in there 😂😂. Also bIll NYE said he didn’t mind it being taught just not in science class. He didn’t even say jeep it out of history class lol. He seemed more respectful than I was expecting and I agree tbh
@@empereurjustinien2082 . Engineering is engineering it uses mathematics and physics. Mathematics and physics is used to some extent in every area of science.
If Adam and Eve were the first persons on earth, and had 2 male children, who did they sleep with to produce offspring, their mother or their sisters??
@@doublevision9937 jsleep said "county" not "country." Kentucky has counties too. That said I agree that they should check their sources, but I would go one step further and ask that the sources be provided.
@@eddyeldridge7427 faith is not about facts. It is about believing. I beleive those who claimed to be eye witnesses of Jesus resurrection. If you want to beleive in facts then stick to facts. Perhaps science or evolution might be better for you. There are many RUclips videos on that too I assume. Take care.
Love you Bill. Thank you for standing up for fact and trying to help people realize that the Bible was not literal. I think as long as people believe that it was a literal. As long as we're living in a fairy tale, the world will never be fixed
If you go to the actual Bibles description of the dimensions of the ark it is a big rectangular box. It has no bow and no stern no pointed and no water, I mean rudder. So the very premise of the exhibit is an accurate to Bible standards the whole thing is a big joke. This coming from someone who firmly believes that eight people survived in the biblical description of Noahs Ark. A rectangular box a few stories high whose purpose was to float not to navigate
Not to mention: this means we're also all "descendants" of Noah and his wife and children-- which would post-date this Adam and Eve theory Oh, and how he gathered a pair of mosquitos in a box. Or that a "pair of bees" (or ants) were gathered. I mean, there's no "king and queen". 🤣
Bill Nye, while he is knowledgeable, is still mainly a public figure. He is a mouthpiece for science, not the brain. His job is to make people interested in learning science.
The only way i see this ark thing working is if the ark was a “space ship” and on board was the DNA of every living thing but I’m sure that wasn’t the case lol
Then it's clearly the only museum you've ever been to. Other museums show actual proven facts. This one only shows stuff that was written thousands of years ago by schizophrenic drunks.
Respect the kind of patience it takes to converse with some people. These fairy tales have no place in humanity's future but getting rid of them takes patient debunking.
And how well have you actually done to rid yourself of ancient superstitions? Because in my country, where much of this science allegedly originated, we appear to be going in the opposite direction.
@Killsocialmedia People think it must be.. so it is. Presupposing that dinosaurs must be in the Bible. There is nothing within the text that suggests the Behemoth and Leviathin are any kind of "prehistoric" creatures. It's more likely the animals called by those names are still living.
Lol Bill Guy is so biased he can’t even say a piece of artwork is beautiful. He even goes to say that it’s “troubling” lmao. He’s an engineer, not a scientist.
Even though engineering is a form of science he has multiple different degrees in science as well and they’re all different types of science not only engineering
I have been surfing the internet on various posts and comments on the Ark in Williamstown, KY. And, of course, we know skeptics, atheists and evolutionists are going to go there only to criticize, insult and discredit both this full scale replica of the Ark and the biblical account of Noah and the global Flood. I look forward to seeing the Ark and creation museum before the Lord takes me home because the biblical fact of the earth-shattering, earth-restructuring global flood of Noah (Genesis 6 to 9) is so vital to understanding the biblical world view of a young earth (there are over 200 legends or flood stories of a world-wide global flood all over the world). Proponents of uniformitarian evolutionary science, especially geology, dismiss the fact of Noah's Flood as a myth not so much because of the details of the story; for example, the dimensions of the Ark which, by the way correspond to modern shipbuilding construction (ratio of 6:1)--not so much because of the questions raised about the space and food required to accommodate all the animals on board, all of which have been answered before (the Ark had 1.4 million cubic feet capacity, which was more than enough space for all on board, with plenty of space left over for Noah and his family)---but because to acknowledge the fact of Noah and a world-wide , catastrophic flood would revolutionize everything they have learned to date about uniformitarian evolution in modern science, especially in biology and geology. Keeping in in mind that a global, catastrophic flood would involve violent upheavals of the earth’s crust involving earthquakes, volcanic activity, flooding and tsunamis, consider the rapid geological work in minutes and hours as a result of local floods ((New Orleans), tsunami that hit India and Sri Lanka or the Mt. St. Helen’s explosion that according to one TV science documentary has virtually changed most of what scientists regarded as “conventional wisdom” as to geological time and processes for formation of many of the land forms and features we see today. Also, Christians who try to harmonize the Genesis account of Noah’s Flood with long ages of evolutionary teaching should remember that not only are they going contrary to well-established facts about the earliest record of human history and civilization, about 6000 years, they are also going contrary to Moses and Jesus, who stand or fall together on the historicity of the Noahic Flood (it was around 4000 years when the advanced cultures on earth in Egypt, Sumeria, Babylon, etc. first began to appear. These cultures produced marvels of human ingenuity). I could say much more, but I have said enough to show that there is ample evidence to believe in the global flood of Noah--perhaps the most denied fact (next to Christ’s bodily resurrection from the grave) in all history by unbelievers. But, my friend, if you cannot believe that the account of the earth-shattering, earth-restructuring, catastrophic flood of Noah is true (historical fact), then you can’t believe any of inspired, infallible scripture (2 Timothy 3:16). Moses and Jesus accepted both creation and Noah’s Flood as as historical fact (Matthew 5:17; 19:4; Matthew 24:37-39). Whether or not you think me somewhat proud and arrogant, I can say with confidence and assurance on both the basis of the scientific evidence and the authority of God’s inspired, infallible Word that I will take the Bible any day over the fallible opinion and reasoning of evolutionary scientists and modern skeptics (let them laugh, mock and ridicule), without apology and without compromise. Let them mock all they want and sit in judgment upon the truth of God’s Word concerning the fact of the global flood of Noah in their spiritual blindness and unbelief, God’s Word will one day sit in judgment upon them. Something to think about. God bless.
You forgot to mention that Noah and his family had special genes because out of only the 8 of them they managed to have babies of various race, asian, black, white, indian....................
I give Bill credit for putting up with Ken for 2 hrs, absolutely absurd how they can teach kids the story of Noah's ark as truth! Keep religion out of schools!
@@tank7162 and science "theory' and mathematical "theory' and language "theory' ..... Wow you are right!!!! Christian school must be a breeze. All you have to do is memorize christian mythology.
Bill Nye the "I can read a script and act like I can teach most basic Science to children, but fail miserably and melt down when confronted by anyone with common sense" guy🤣
Bill Nye is a mechanical engineer, he applies real physics to his work. He didn't just read the script, he wrote it. I am wondering though, what are you referring to when you say "common sense"?
If you watch the full tour on answers in genesis, you will hopefully realize that the vast majority of bill nye’s come backs lack common sense let alone actual science.
There were scientific inventions long before Darwin. Dr. Marc Kirschner , founding chair of Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School stated : "In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has preceded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all” (quoted in the Boston Globe, 23 October, 2005. ). Indeed, many of the most scientific advances we enjoy--cell phones (James Clerk Maxwell), Computing machines (Charles Babbage), the airplane (Orville and Wilbur Wright) , the theory of planetary orbits ( Johannes Kepler), theory of gravity and laws of motion (Isaac Newton), first moon landing (headed by Werner von Brown), Aseptic surgery ( Joseph Lister), Anaesthesia (James Simpson), Germ theory of disease *Louis Pasteur) and more recently MRI or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Dr. Raymond Damadian) had nothing to do with evolution, but depended solely upon the foundations laid by creation scientists.
WOW! Absolutely!!! So many great scientists. Do you think that people, in general, believe that NOTHING happened before Darwin? You are sadly deluded. The history of science is long and liberally sprinkled with great thinkers, great scientists and great discoveries. But even if many of these scientists were creationists, few if any, were YOUNG EARTH creationists. It was evident to almost everyone that the earth was WAY older than the narrative of the bible could account for. Multi-millions of years was suspected but no one could determine how much time. Read about James Hutton, Scottish Geologist from whom Darwin took some of his ideas for biological evolution including natural selection. He died before C. Darwin was born. Hutton was a deist and denied the story of biblical creation though accepted a teleological explanation for the existence of the earth and the universe. Again, LONG before Darwin. This is a quote that resonates with much of the scientific world: Theodosius Dobzhansky, "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" (1973)
Ray, are you honestly trying to make an argument that because a few cherry picked examples of inventions or discovery do not have direct links to the theory of evolution, the theory of evolution is somehow wrong? All of that perfectly consistent fossil, DNA, radiometric, sedimentary rate, tree ring, archeological and scientific evidence for the theory of evolution can be somehow dismissed now can it? I'm sure your examples will convince all of those biologists, paleontologists, geologists, archaeologists, astronomers, particle physicists, astrophysicists, astrobiologists, etc. Also Dr. Marc Kirschner is not a theist. Do you honestly think a biologist like him that literally teaches evolutionary biology would somehow not believe what he teaches?
The fact that this is troubling to Bill Nye tells you everything you need to know about him. Just leave us alone what difference does it make what we believe? You don't hear about Christians bothering anyone about what they believe. We just want to be left alone and live free and in peace.
"The fact that this is troubling to Bill Nye tells you everything you need to know about him." The fact that he doesn't like people lying to people? Sure. " Just leave us alone what difference does it make what we believe?" Because your beliefs don';t exist in a vacuum. They inform your actions, and your actions effect others. " You don't hear about Christians bothering anyone about what they believe." They're literally inside a "museum" promoting your religion. Christians are outside, all the time, protesting in the name of their faith. People preaching on the street, shouting at passersby to follow Jesus. " We just want to be left alone and live free and in peace." Blatant lie.
The fact that there are millions of Christians who believe that their views on reality should be legislated and taught in public schools along with actual science flies in the face to your argument here. Yes creationists are bothering others; they’re lying to children. It’s troubling because parents are indoctrinating children into a world of baseless, unsubstantiated claims of a young earth that brings them away from real discoveries and from helping the world from future devastations
@@eddyeldridge7427 Can you show me the proof of evolution? Not what a scientist said... the proof... oh... wait... your "proof" is the word of someone you don't know? Oh... sounds kind of like a modern day prophet with nothing to show as evidence besides his word of what he found... interesting....
I believe in creationism.. I am a Christian I am, however an old earth creationist. I believe that those 7 days mentioned in the Bible were 7 thousand years and saying that I don’t believe that the earth is only 8 thousand years old
@@silviodonte6282 I don't believe that, at all. It's really telling how your side has to make up what I believe, in order to have something to argue against.
Unsure of what you mean by this, but I assume by the context that you don't believe it, and are religious. We do, in fact, share 50% of our DNA with bananas. It doesn't mean much, it simply implies a common ancestor (likely from when life first began). 50% is actually quite low.
Bill you are so protesting. Maybe you should ask for a heart of repentance for a change, you just keep stuffing with heart and mind with arguments over what people truly believe.
Just because you got more answers doesn't mean you're more correct. Without the teacher, who's to say that Ken got any of the answers right, let alone all of them? All that Bill Nye did was question Ken's position, that shouldn't bring him to any level of intellect; you shouldn't be able to compare Bill to Ken, that's like comparing a student to a proctor. *Bill Nye just chucks more questions, but that doesn't mean anything.*
Ole Nye is a rock star who may find himself a trillion miles away all alone in outer space burning while at the same time wishing he had not dishonored his creator.
It's not about having a closed mind. Evolution has the evidence to back it up, Creationism DOES NOT! That was settled 150 years ago, and the evidence has been piling on evolution's side ever since. Follow the evidence, not the stories.
I am not arguing if there is or if there is not a God. Just if Bill is a scientist, then he ought to keep an open mind. Plus who is to say that evolution is not God's plan? Evolution could be how creationism unfolded. I think evolution would be a beautiful way to unfold God's plan. Regardless, answer how it all started, before evolution?? Where did the planets and solar system and big bang originate?? That's a question dear Bill can not answer, so he should not be discounting other's ideas or beliefs, when even the great mind of Bill does not have the answer.
No, you'd go to Lawrence Krauss for that answer, it's a bit beyond Bill's purview. Over the past century of so, we've achieved a fairly good understanding of how stars, planets, and such form. We've been able to determine the age of the universe, as in, the time since cosmic inflation began, as being 13.8 billion years, with only about +/- 21 million years error. And this is subject to further revision as more data comes in. By that, I mean that the scientific process is like a game of 20 questions, where with each question answered, you correct your understanding, and that correction is always an improvement. So while science may never know everything, it is always getting nearer to whatever the truth of the matter may be, not further away, as Creationism has been routinely doing. Creationism assumes the conclusion, and only accepts (with "God Glasses") evidence which can be contorted to support THEIR conclusion, while rejecting and dismissing anything that might stand against it. We also know, more of less, how molecular polymers (proteins) are formed, even in deep space, so it turns out the famous Miller-Urey experiments were redundant, other than demonstrating that it such proteins could form under a given set of natural conditions, though we're still ironing out what those condition might have been to get the process started on OUR planet. We're also in the process of ironing out the stages and processes necessary for abiogenesis, whether life originated on Earth or was transplanted from elsewhere via comet or asteroid (transpermia). Many times in the past, famous scientists have attributed what they could not explain to God, and that branch of science had stagnated until somebody else came along to figure out what's really going on. If there's anything the wisdom of the ages has told us, is that simply NOT knowing how something works, or how it happened, is no reason to go blaming anything on invisible, magical, anthropomorphic immortals that can't be shown themselves to actually exist. We don't insert God into the equation, because "God" can not be demonstrated (and apparently doesn't want to be either - make what you will of that), and thus has no value in those equations. So the only way to understand these processes is to remove God from the equation. Once you DO understand the given process, you begin to wonder why you ever invoked God to explain it in the first place. This has always been the case - once you understand how something works, you don't need God to explain it! Biological evolution is a fact of nature, whether God exists or not. And that's the key. Once you have the mechanisms established, as we do, God becomes, not only redundant, and therefor unnecessary, but also unfalsifiable. If (a) God had a hand in it all, there's no way to tell, since the process has been demonstrated to work well enough without that assumption. But we're not arguing "Old-Earth" creationism, since while it's not supported by science, it generally doesn't get in it's way either. You can freely say that we understand all the scientific processes which formed life, the universe, and everything, but that God manipulated the strings over billions of years from behind the scenes to create a more favorable chain of causality, and while I would be unable to tell you, "no," you'd also be unable to demonstrate it. It's an unfalsifiable proposition either way, and THAT's why science doesn't consider it. No, the issue is that Ken Ham and his ilk wish to push their religious views of the origins of man and the cosmos, which HAVE been conclusively debunked, onto gullible children, as if they were a matter of fact. The 6000-10,000 year-old Earth creationist narrative of the "Creation" AND the "Global Flood" HAS been conclusively debunked. Their narrative DID NOT HAPPEN, and is not in any way based in reality, thus Ken Ham is LYING to children who aren't knowledgeable enough to tell the difference. That's why Bill is against even teaching this "alternate view," even as a parallel possibility, because it ISN'T a possibility - The Genesis Creation and Flood narratives are DEMONSTRABLY false! They DID NOT HAPPEN!
Here is another thought... If you read Genises, it perfectly describes evolution... God first created the heavens and the earth (stars and planets), then separated the sky (earth's atmosphere), then gathered the water and created land (plate tectonics and volcanoes), then small life forms, then bigger life forms, and lastly God created man... This sure does describe evolution very accurately!! How did the Bible so accurately describe this evolution so many thousands of years ago?! Scary, isn't it! You, I, and Bill can not scientifically prove or disprove, any of this, so we should all hold our judgement of others' beliefs and ideas. I believe there is something behind all of these wonders, and that something is God. One day we will all learn these secrets... or none of us will. In the meantime don't judge what is unprovable nor disprovable.
+Johnny Rondelez It doesn't describe "evolution" at all, dingus. Genesis describes a series of separate and spontaneous "creation" events, with no inherent ancestry or alleleic variation between generations to produce the speciation that is vital to evolutionary theory. Not only is there no coherent time scale to attribute the "day" to any "age," but the order of events and the described method is wrong as well. Genesis has the "heavens" and the "earth" being created on the first day, with the sun, moon, and stars being created on the fourth day, In other words, God said, "Let there be light," on the fist day, but made no sun to produce it until the fourth day, so there could be no evening or morning of the first, second, and third days. A popular rationalization is that God produced the "light" himself until he remembered to create the sun, but that is not explained, nor is it anywhere implied. The way Genesis 1 describes the Earth's formation makes sense if you consider the "firmament" view of cosmology that was so popular at the time. In real life, the sun predated the Earth, just as any star in whatever protoplanetary disk you care to study will precede the formation of it's daughter planets from the gravitational collapse of it's surrounding debris. The moon is slightly younger than the Earth's initial formation, though it has to be conceded that the cataclysmic event which formed the moon from the collision between Earth and the hypothesized planetoid "Theia" would have had the effect of resetting any geologic development, such as the formation of continents, back to a molten state world-wide. It should also be noted, that during the Hadean era when this giant impact would have taken place (according to the leading hypothesis of the moon's origin) Earth was still quite molten, and there would have been no world-wide ocean yet, as Genesis describes. The sun and moon preceded the oceans, in other words. And this is to say nothing about how Genesis describes parting water from water to create the sky, which is, again, describing the firmament cosmology that was so popular at the time, where the waters above, held up by the firmament, are separated from the waters below by "sky." The third day has vegetation being produced before there was any sun for photosynthesis. Again, this was before people knew that the Earth orbited the sun, and that the sun itself was responsible for the light of day, and not just a "light in the sky" to separate day and night. The sun brings the day, not the other way around. Without the sun, there IS no day. Photosynthesis evolved in single-cell micro-organisms long before any land-based vegetation evolved, and even before tectonic activity had raised portions of the plates to form dry land. So there would have to be sunlight before dry land, and before plants, which again, puts Genesis out of order with reality, and out of reach of the "day-age" hypothesis advanced by old-earth creationists, as no meaningful amount of time could have passed without sunlight in such a hypothesis, otherwise all these early photosynthetic organisms would have died out, making God look like an idiot. Aquatic life evolved long before vegetation on dry ground, again, defying the Genesis narrative. Land animals evolved before birds, as birds are the descendants of dinosaurs, and MAN was not created in God's image, but evolved from prior species of ape which are now extinct. Even though Homo sapiens is a relatively recent species against the age of the earth, and even against other life on this planet, there are also plenty of species YOUNGER than humans. Woman wouldn't have been created from man's rib either, since as with every other predominantly heterosexual organism on the planet, it is the FEMALE who is the staple of the species, not the male. Some species, such as the New Mexico Whiptail, have evolved to the point where they no longer need males at all to procreate. They are parthenogenic, which is something that HUMANS are incapable of. So no virgin conception either. Even allowing for one biblical "day" to equate to an "age" in geologic history, none of this matches up with the Genesis narrative. You are too stone-dumb ignorant of the history of the cosmos, this planet, and life on it to be able to compare Genesis with actual events, and are in no place to determine what Bill Nye or myself can prove or disprove about anything. It is those who know little, not those who know much, who posit this or that will never be solved by science.
FAITH and SCIENCE are tandem. IF SCIENCE is a physical Brain that we can touch, measure, or weigh as evidence,... then FAITH is the MIND, where SCIENCE has in no way of knowing how it actually working. Its like INVISIBLE / VISIBLE where visible stuff is the atom, while the INVISIBLE belongs to Electromagnetic waves or Photons. There's an old saying MIND/ MATTER.
Science does not cover just the natural world. There are sciences that attempt to identify cognitive and emotional processes. These include, but are not limited to, psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science.
@@katiefrench5322 Foolish indeed. I have a prophecy. The evil of religious dogma will be the cause of countless wars and suffering of the innocent. Until all people of the world learn to share a collective consciousness there will never be true peace, love, understanding and togetherness. "Those who make you believe absurdities , can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Развлечения
Watching them interact never gets old
I now
Ham.... you're a piece of work😂
Belief is accepting something as true without evidence.
Bill Nye doesn't have belief, he has evidence.
He views the evidence with the belief that we don't have a back-story to go off of. So of course scientists with this view will find what aligns with thier belief that it must have come about naturally, randomly or some other way, anyway other than what thier ancestors taught them. Just as a creationist will find what aligns with thier belief when looking at the same data set.
Nye has zero evidence. All his "evidence" is quietly refuted given a few years. That is why I have a standing challenge to evolutionists to provide one example of evidence for Darwinian evolution that is 30 years or older, and not refuted. Never once had an example.
When asked about his belief in human life arising from natural process he simply pointed at members of the crowd stating them as evidence. Now if a Creationist were to do the same thing when asked for evidence for God's creation of man it wouldnt have flown as legitimate answer. Now Bill Nye could have provided evidence as he was asked 2-3 times throughout the tour, What ever evidence there is for human life arising through natural process it appears Bill doesn't know of it.
Bills answer to the question of whether mutations have been observed producing new genetic information was quite lackluster in the evidence department, Ken Hams veiw is that observable adaptations are the result of Genetic loss (which is quite commonly observable). Once again perhaps their could be evidence but Mr Nye failed to present it.
After watching the 2 hour tour I have come to the conclusion that this event should have occurred when the Ark was closed to the public. I believe all of the noise of the people in addition to the various exhibitits was too distracting for both Ham and Nye and led to many communication misshaps, the biggest being half answered questions and thoughts being left when people interjected or new exhibits were noticed. In a less distracting environment perhaps discussion could have been more fruitful in understanding these worldviews.
So in my view to make the claim that Bill's worldview has no basis in faith would be untrue.
@@zaneb7113 youtube appears to be erasing your comment. I did read it. Yes, I have a standing challenge to evolutionists to give me one example of evidence for Darwinian Evolution(which is macro-evolution), that is 30 years old or older, and not refuted. No one has ever been able to do it. Their massive pile of "evidence" is refuted, and usually by pro-evolution scientists. They simply do not hold up to scrutiny or time.
Delusional evidence
Bill Nye is a straight up LEGEND!!!
Not even close
@@yourvault1612 Ken Ham is a legend
Bill Nye does not know science. He knows motivational speaking...if that.
Not remotely close.
@@flyhayst Bill Nye is a legend in his own mind.
I love how on all of the Ken Hamm video's the comments are turned off. Christians just don't want to hear it.
It's his style. To make sure he controls things. Same style as he shows when he keeps butting in to stop Nye making his points.
Or... or maybe he just doesn’t want a comment section full of hate which is likely going to happen?
@Killsocialmedia There is no logic where Christianity is involved.
@@thadaliciousdelicio pretty generalizing statement. Precisely the type of insult the fool would use
disprove an argument to his beliefs.
@@kensword73 Not an insult. Just an observation
Now they're putting dinosaurs on the ark? Christians wonder why people make fun of them....
Bill Nye did it in this video.... He called the whole thing troubling. Lol. Did you even watch the video?
no....they really dont.....
Dinosaurs were on the ark according to the Bible
We all need to pray for Mr. Ney.
😂😂😂 ohh you theists never make me not laugh 😂
Such primitive people
if you do not understand how carbon dating works, or how a person working in that type of science could come to determine the age of a sample through isolating elements and reading data, then why would you argue for something like this?
There are actually more accurate ways to measure other than carbon dating that are currently being used to date objects back much further.
I don’t mind the idea of Noah’s arc being an exhibit at all but why did they throw dinosaurs in there 😂😂. Also bIll NYE said he didn’t mind it being taught just not in science class. He didn’t even say jeep it out of history class lol. He seemed more respectful than I was expecting and I agree tbh
Bill Nye the mechanical engineering degree guy.
Engineering is applied physics
Too true
@@empereurjustinien2082 it’s not a science
@@bmcash3411 Engeneering is legit applied
Science. Look up the difference between applied & basic science. Cause your wrong.
@@empereurjustinien2082 . Engineering is engineering it uses mathematics and physics. Mathematics and physics is used to some extent in every area of science.
Release the whole video...
The whole 2 hour uncut video is online. Answers in Genesis channel.
So what if they are beautifully done? You can gold-plate a turd.
please don't tell me they are interviewing a young earth creationist and telling everyone he stands for all of christianity
If Adam and Eve were the first persons on earth, and had 2 male children, who did they sleep with to produce offspring, their mother or their sisters??
I’m pretty sure it was the mother
No Adam and Eve had more that 2 children.
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 Adam and Eve are fictional characters. Only children believe that nonsense.
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 I don't think that changes the question my guy
I hear this place is losing a ton of revenue and killing the tax revenue the county it was built in was hoping to gain from this resort thing.
It was built in Kentucky.,. thats a state, in The U.S.. may wanna check your sources.
@@doublevision9937 jsleep said "county" not "country." Kentucky has counties too. That said I agree that they should check their sources, but I would go one step further and ask that the sources be provided.
Me and my church there it was amazing
You and your church are disgraces to the human race.
The Scriptures are obviously early examples of 'Superhero Comics'.
Im sorry Bill but every time I hear someone misname a dinosaur hurts my soul a little, btw the dinosaur in the first few seconds is called Nigersaurus
The thing i find fascinating is that no one is bothered by other religions but once Christianity is brought in the topic, they become tense. Odd.
No that's not the case other religions are debated to it's just that christianity is really big so it's more debated than other
@@player_45ger7 Not like Judah cares about things like facts or reality
Same. It's really interesting.
@@justynak3867
What, you don't care about facts, either?
@@eddyeldridge7427 faith is not about facts. It is about believing. I beleive those who claimed to be eye witnesses of Jesus resurrection. If you want to beleive in facts then stick to facts. Perhaps science or evolution might be better for you. There are many RUclips videos on that too I assume. Take care.
Love you Bill. Thank you for standing up for fact and trying to help people realize that the Bible was not literal. I think as long as people believe that it was a literal. As long as we're living in a fairy tale, the world will never be fixed
If you go to the actual Bibles description of the dimensions of the ark it is a big rectangular box. It has no bow and no stern no pointed and no water, I mean rudder. So the very premise of the exhibit is an accurate to Bible standards the whole thing is a big joke. This coming from someone who firmly believes that eight people survived in the biblical description of Noahs Ark. A rectangular box a few stories high whose purpose was to float not to navigate
You really believe that lol? How would a rectangular box move through raging water lol
Seriously? A rectanglular wooden boat a few stories high that also cant maneuver in a raging flood? Lol. Wow. You ppl truly lack any common sense.
It is not described as a box at all lol 😂 read the Bible dude
Not to mention: this means we're also all "descendants" of Noah and his wife and children-- which would post-date this Adam and Eve theory Oh, and how he gathered a pair of mosquitos in a box. Or that a "pair of bees" (or ants) were gathered. I mean, there's no "king and queen". 🤣
everytime ken hamm opens his mouth i cringe.
Seriously Bill why? It is beneath you! Why did you bother?
What can be beneath a charlatan/ snake oil salesman? Not much.
Bill Nye is a hater, that’s why he says “I guess.”
Bill Nye, while he is knowledgeable, is still mainly a public figure. He is a mouthpiece for science, not the brain. His job is to make people interested in learning science.
We can to attempt to get these people to understand science
Bill Nye savage guy
The only way i see this ark thing working is if the ark was a “space ship” and on board was the DNA of every living thing but I’m sure that wasn’t the case lol
How would DNA get these weirdos to believe in science? 🤣
Science Guy doing a mockumentary film of the Ark
To be fair, Bill Nye isn't a scientist. He literally just played one on TV.
The best museum I ever been to
Then it's clearly the only museum you've ever been to. Other museums show actual proven facts. This one only shows stuff that was written thousands of years ago by schizophrenic drunks.
"The Bible is true because the Bible is true "
Poor bill 😢
I know the pain he’s going through, the stress these theists give 😂😅
Trust me ik the feeling
Bill should be president
Its so clear Bill Nye is correct, i dont get the confusion
Hey Bill what say you about soft tissue in dinosaur fossils?
Shouldn't you read what the scientist who discovered it said?
I love how Bill Nye rips this exhibit apart! Lol
Rips? That's a Bit of an exaggeration. lol.
Ken Ham vs Aronra
Bill Nye is a hater, that’s why he says “I guess.”
He is rather rude about it
When was that????
Also did you know he thinks aliens came to earth and created life????yeah pbs left out that part of the video
Respect the kind of patience it takes to converse with some people. These fairy tales have no place in humanity's future but getting rid of them takes patient debunking.
There is no point in trying to debunk someone who believes any opposition to their point of view is the work of Satan. You can only restrict them.
Do you believe in absolutes? There is a rise in freethinking minds in my country because we engage those of our own still tethered to illogical stuff.
And how well have you actually done to rid yourself of ancient superstitions? Because in my country, where much of this science allegedly originated, we appear to be going in the opposite direction.
Ojay, there's only so much you can do to reason with somebody who refuses to be reasoned with.
@@OjaysReel And your country is?...
The book of Genesis says nothing about dinosaurs.
Very true, but it does mention clean and unclean creatures of all kind.
Scripture references behemoth and dragons, believed to possibly be what we know as dinosaur.
Killsocialmedia dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Bible, but words such as “ Leviathan” “ behemoth” and “dragon” are used
@Killsocialmedia People think it must be.. so it is. Presupposing that dinosaurs must be in the Bible.
There is nothing within the text that suggests the Behemoth and Leviathin are any kind of "prehistoric" creatures. It's more likely the animals called by those names are still living.
@Elise Leid They would not have been called “dinosaurs” because that term didn’t exist until about 1841
Bill Nye is not a sheep 💁
This should not be betrayed as fact..
A hundred million dollars for a lie museum.
I'm sure bill doesn't get paid that much.
What's your evidence that they lie?
Yeah, show us!
Do you have proof that they lied?
the filmic pandering is a bit much eh😭😭😭 could’ve proved the point without the *children look at lies* film editing
Lol Bill Guy is so biased he can’t even say a piece of artwork is beautiful. He even goes to say that it’s “troubling” lmao. He’s an engineer, not a scientist.
Joshua Haynes and the bible is a story book.
Even though engineering is a form of science he has multiple different degrees in science as well and they’re all different types of science not only engineering
I’m 100% sure Bill Nye has more degrees than you will ever have lol
Bill Nye is a hater, that’s why he says “I guess.”
What? now all of a sudden people aren't allowed to have personal tastes? Piece of artwork?
I have been surfing the internet on various posts and comments on the Ark in Williamstown, KY. And, of course, we know skeptics, atheists and evolutionists are going to go there only to criticize, insult and discredit both this full scale replica of the Ark and the biblical account of Noah and the global Flood. I look forward to seeing the Ark and creation museum before the Lord takes me home because the biblical fact of the earth-shattering, earth-restructuring global flood of Noah (Genesis 6 to 9) is so vital to understanding the biblical world view of a young earth (there are over 200 legends or flood stories of a world-wide global flood all over the world).
Proponents of uniformitarian evolutionary science, especially geology, dismiss the fact of Noah's Flood as a myth not so much because of the details of the story; for example, the dimensions of the Ark which, by the way correspond to modern shipbuilding construction (ratio of 6:1)--not so much because of the questions raised about the space and food required to accommodate all the animals on board, all of which have been answered before (the Ark had 1.4 million cubic feet capacity, which was more than enough space for all on board, with plenty of space left over for Noah and his family)---but because to acknowledge the fact of Noah and a world-wide , catastrophic flood would revolutionize everything they have learned to date about uniformitarian evolution in modern science, especially in biology and geology.
Keeping in in mind that a global, catastrophic flood would involve violent upheavals of the earth’s crust involving earthquakes, volcanic activity, flooding and tsunamis, consider the rapid geological work in minutes and hours as a result of local floods ((New Orleans), tsunami that hit India and Sri Lanka or the Mt. St. Helen’s explosion that according to one TV science documentary has virtually changed most of what scientists regarded as “conventional wisdom” as to geological time and processes for formation of many of the land forms and features we see today. Also, Christians who try to harmonize the Genesis account of Noah’s Flood with long ages of evolutionary teaching should remember that not only are they going contrary to well-established facts about the earliest record of human history and civilization, about 6000 years, they are also going contrary to Moses and Jesus, who stand or fall together on the historicity of the Noahic Flood (it was around 4000 years when the advanced cultures on earth in Egypt, Sumeria, Babylon, etc. first began to appear. These cultures produced marvels of human ingenuity).
I could say much more, but I have said enough to show that there is ample evidence to believe in the global flood of Noah--perhaps the most denied fact (next to Christ’s bodily resurrection from the grave) in all history by unbelievers. But, my friend, if you cannot believe that the account of the earth-shattering, earth-restructuring, catastrophic flood of Noah is true (historical fact), then you can’t believe any of inspired, infallible scripture (2 Timothy 3:16). Moses and Jesus accepted both creation and Noah’s Flood as as historical fact (Matthew 5:17; 19:4; Matthew 24:37-39).
Whether or not you think me somewhat proud and arrogant, I can say with confidence and assurance on both the basis of the scientific evidence and the authority of God’s inspired, infallible Word that I will take the Bible any day over the fallible opinion and reasoning of evolutionary scientists and modern skeptics (let them laugh, mock and ridicule), without apology and without compromise. Let them mock all they want and sit in judgment upon the truth of God’s Word concerning the fact of the global flood of Noah in their spiritual blindness and unbelief, God’s Word will one day sit in judgment upon them. Something to think about. God bless.
Carbon age & scientific facts > book written by men in loin cloths 2000 years ago.
You forgot to mention that Noah and his family had special genes because out of only the 8 of them they managed to have babies of various race, asian, black, white, indian....................
@@turbocpt1 Actually that's answered in this video: ruclips.net/video/CFYswvGoaPU/видео.html
Amen. Well said!
I give Bill credit for putting up with Ken for 2 hrs, absolutely absurd how they can teach kids the story of Noah's ark as truth! Keep religion out of schools!
Than keep your evolution "theory" out as well.
@@tank7162 and science "theory' and mathematical "theory' and language "theory' ..... Wow you are right!!!! Christian school must be a breeze. All you have to do is memorize christian mythology.
@@tank7162 and we will never "evolve" in to more than simple minded fools.
There are only two genders.
@@c.l.1820 And it is OK if you identify with both of them.
Bill Nye the "I can read a script and act like I can teach most basic Science to children, but fail miserably and melt down when confronted by anyone with common sense" guy🤣
Bill Nye is a mechanical engineer, he applies real physics to his work. He didn't just read the script, he wrote it. I am wondering though, what are you referring to when you say "common sense"?
@@harrygundry5848 hes a creationist that thinks fairytales are common sense.
William Holshoy L
@@atheisth5066 You mean like t Rex turning into chickens 🐔 🤣
If you watch the full tour on answers in genesis, you will hopefully realize that the vast majority of bill nye’s come backs lack common sense let alone actual science.
There were scientific inventions long before Darwin. Dr. Marc Kirschner , founding chair of Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School stated : "In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has preceded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all” (quoted in the Boston Globe, 23 October, 2005. ). Indeed, many of the most scientific advances we enjoy--cell phones (James Clerk Maxwell), Computing machines (Charles Babbage), the airplane (Orville and Wilbur Wright) , the theory of planetary orbits ( Johannes Kepler), theory of gravity and laws of motion (Isaac Newton), first moon landing (headed by Werner von Brown), Aseptic surgery ( Joseph Lister), Anaesthesia (James Simpson), Germ theory of disease *Louis Pasteur) and more recently MRI or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Dr. Raymond Damadian) had nothing to do with evolution, but depended solely upon the foundations laid by creation scientists.
WOW! Absolutely!!! So many great scientists.
Do you think that people, in general, believe that NOTHING happened before Darwin? You are sadly deluded.
The history of science is long and liberally sprinkled with great thinkers, great scientists and great discoveries.
But even if many of these scientists were creationists, few if any, were YOUNG EARTH creationists. It was evident to almost everyone that the earth was WAY older than the narrative of the bible could account for. Multi-millions of years was suspected but no one could determine how much time. Read about James Hutton, Scottish Geologist from whom Darwin took some of his ideas for biological evolution including natural selection. He died before C. Darwin was born. Hutton was a deist and denied the story of biblical creation though accepted a teleological explanation for the existence of the earth and the universe. Again, LONG before Darwin.
This is a quote that resonates with much of the scientific world: Theodosius Dobzhansky, "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" (1973)
Ray, are you honestly trying to make an argument that because a few cherry picked examples of inventions or discovery do not have direct links to the theory of evolution, the theory of evolution is somehow wrong? All of that perfectly consistent fossil, DNA, radiometric, sedimentary rate, tree ring, archeological and scientific evidence for the theory of evolution can be somehow dismissed now can it?
I'm sure your examples will convince all of those biologists, paleontologists, geologists, archaeologists, astronomers, particle physicists, astrophysicists, astrobiologists, etc.
Also Dr. Marc Kirschner is not a theist. Do you honestly think a biologist like him that literally teaches evolutionary biology would somehow not believe what he teaches?
Cope and seethe, zealot
The fact that this is troubling to Bill Nye tells you everything you need to know about him. Just leave us alone what difference does it make what we believe? You don't hear about Christians bothering anyone about what they believe. We just want to be left alone and live free and in peace.
"The fact that this is troubling to Bill Nye tells you everything you need to know about him."
The fact that he doesn't like people lying to people? Sure.
" Just leave us alone what difference does it make what we believe?"
Because your beliefs don';t exist in a vacuum. They inform your actions, and your actions effect others.
" You don't hear about Christians bothering anyone about what they believe."
They're literally inside a "museum" promoting your religion.
Christians are outside, all the time, protesting in the name of their faith.
People preaching on the street, shouting at passersby to follow Jesus.
" We just want to be left alone and live free and in peace."
Blatant lie.
The fact that there are millions of Christians who believe that their views on reality should be legislated and taught in public schools along with actual science flies in the face to your argument here. Yes creationists are bothering others; they’re lying to children. It’s troubling because parents are indoctrinating children into a world of baseless, unsubstantiated claims of a young earth that brings them away from real discoveries and from helping the world from future devastations
@@eddyeldridge7427 Can you show me the proof of evolution? Not what a scientist said... the proof... oh... wait... your "proof" is the word of someone you don't know? Oh... sounds kind of like a modern day prophet with nothing to show as evidence besides his word of what he found... interesting....
@@Tony-qt4zv
My proof is selective dog breeding, which I have seen myself.
If I merely took other people's word for things, I'd still be Christian.
@@teathpaste3301 we're not talking about the history of Christianity. Were talking about what's going on here and now.
Who cares what that guy thinks? 😒
I believe in creationism.. I am a Christian I am, however an old earth creationist. I believe that those 7 days mentioned in the Bible were 7 thousand years and saying that I don’t believe that the earth is only 8 thousand years old
So, you believe the sun was created thousands of years after the first plants were created on Earth?
@@eddyeldridge7427 and you believe that nothing created everything which is unscientific
@@silviodonte6282
I don't believe that, at all.
It's really telling how your side has to make up what I believe, in order to have something to argue against.
@@eddyeldridge7427 So with all do respect what do you believe?
@@silviodonte6282
Lots of things. You'll have to be more specific.
Respectfully.
I can't believe I liked this bitter old man when I was in elementary school. CRINGE. 👀
What do you expect from someone who claims he's related to a banana
Beats being related to dust
Unsure of what you mean by this, but I assume by the context that you don't believe it, and are religious. We do, in fact, share 50% of our DNA with bananas. It doesn't mean much, it simply implies a common ancestor (likely from when life first began). 50% is actually quite low.
hahahahaha...love it and yeah so true
Haha Bill Nye fake science guy
@mike stambaugh Your comment indicates pretty clearly that you've no idea what you're talking about.
bill nye not wearing a mask, i expect better of him as an epic intelligent atheist.
Is this a joke?
Bill Nye is a hater, that’s why he says “I guess.”
Is that all you know how to say?
I think you hate other words.
Bill you are so protesting. Maybe you should ask for a heart of repentance for a change, you just keep stuffing with heart and mind with arguments over what people truly believe.
Anoyying bill
@ルカ you two annoy me
@SSS Bill Nye is a hater, that’s why he says “I guess.”
Bill Nye Fake Science Guy
Even Christians know we're animals
Which Christians are you talking about, hypocrites?
you'd be surprised... I sure was when I talked to my extremely religious relatives
Ken answers every question. Bill just chucks more questions. Who is right?
Ken
Just because you got more answers doesn't mean you're more correct. Without the teacher, who's to say that Ken got any of the answers right, let alone all of them? All that Bill Nye did was question Ken's position, that shouldn't bring him to any level of intellect; you shouldn't be able to compare Bill to Ken, that's like comparing a student to a proctor.
*Bill Nye just chucks more questions, but that doesn't mean anything.*
Curry and a Pint That might have to do with the fact that ken's answers make absolutely no sense when you give it one ounce of thought.
Ole Nye is a rock star who may find himself a trillion miles away all alone in outer space burning while at the same time wishing he had not dishonored his creator.
Nye cut Ken Ham off continually the entire time.
Bill, it's not very scientific, to keep such a closed mind. Science can only evolve with open minds and open possibilities.
It's not about having a closed mind. Evolution has the evidence to back it up, Creationism DOES NOT! That was settled 150 years ago, and the evidence has been piling on evolution's side ever since. Follow the evidence, not the stories.
I am not arguing if there is or if there is not a God. Just if Bill is a scientist, then he ought to keep an open mind. Plus who is to say that evolution is not God's plan? Evolution could be how creationism unfolded. I think evolution would be a beautiful way to unfold God's plan. Regardless, answer how it all started, before evolution?? Where did the planets and solar system and big bang originate?? That's a question dear Bill can not answer, so he should not be discounting other's ideas or beliefs, when even the great mind of Bill does not have the answer.
No, you'd go to Lawrence Krauss for that answer, it's a bit beyond Bill's purview.
Over the past century of so, we've achieved a fairly good understanding of how stars, planets, and such form. We've been able to determine the age of the universe, as in, the time since cosmic inflation began, as being 13.8 billion years, with only about +/- 21 million years error. And this is subject to further revision as more data comes in. By that, I mean that the scientific process is like a game of 20 questions, where with each question answered, you correct your understanding, and that correction is always an improvement. So while science may never know everything, it is always getting nearer to whatever the truth of the matter may be, not further away, as Creationism has been routinely doing. Creationism assumes the conclusion, and only accepts (with "God Glasses") evidence which can be contorted to support THEIR conclusion, while rejecting and dismissing anything that might stand against it.
We also know, more of less, how molecular polymers (proteins) are formed, even in deep space, so it turns out the famous Miller-Urey experiments were redundant, other than demonstrating that it such proteins could form under a given set of natural conditions, though we're still ironing out what those condition might have been to get the process started on OUR planet. We're also in the process of ironing out the stages and processes necessary for abiogenesis, whether life originated on Earth or was transplanted from elsewhere via comet or asteroid (transpermia).
Many times in the past, famous scientists have attributed what they could not explain to God, and that branch of science had stagnated until somebody else came along to figure out what's really going on. If there's anything the wisdom of the ages has told us, is that simply NOT knowing how something works, or how it happened, is no reason to go blaming anything on invisible, magical, anthropomorphic immortals that can't be shown themselves to actually exist. We don't insert God into the equation, because "God" can not be demonstrated (and apparently doesn't want to be either - make what you will of that), and thus has no value in those equations. So the only way to understand these processes is to remove God from the equation. Once you DO understand the given process, you begin to wonder why you ever invoked God to explain it in the first place. This has always been the case - once you understand how something works, you don't need God to explain it!
Biological evolution is a fact of nature, whether God exists or not. And that's the key. Once you have the mechanisms established, as we do, God becomes, not only redundant, and therefor unnecessary, but also unfalsifiable. If (a) God had a hand in it all, there's no way to tell, since the process has been demonstrated to work well enough without that assumption.
But we're not arguing "Old-Earth" creationism, since while it's not supported by science, it generally doesn't get in it's way either. You can freely say that we understand all the scientific processes which formed life, the universe, and everything, but that God manipulated the strings over billions of years from behind the scenes to create a more favorable chain of causality, and while I would be unable to tell you, "no," you'd also be unable to demonstrate it. It's an unfalsifiable proposition either way, and THAT's why science doesn't consider it.
No, the issue is that Ken Ham and his ilk wish to push their religious views of the origins of man and the cosmos, which HAVE been conclusively debunked, onto gullible children, as if they were a matter of fact. The 6000-10,000 year-old Earth creationist narrative of the "Creation" AND the "Global Flood" HAS been conclusively debunked. Their narrative DID NOT HAPPEN, and is not in any way based in reality, thus Ken Ham is LYING to children who aren't knowledgeable enough to tell the difference. That's why Bill is against even teaching this "alternate view," even as a parallel possibility, because it ISN'T a possibility - The Genesis Creation and Flood narratives are DEMONSTRABLY false! They DID NOT HAPPEN!
Here is another thought... If you read Genises, it perfectly describes evolution... God first created the heavens and the earth (stars and planets), then separated the sky (earth's atmosphere), then gathered the water and created land (plate tectonics and volcanoes), then small life forms, then bigger life forms, and lastly God created man... This sure does describe evolution very accurately!! How did the Bible so accurately describe this evolution so many thousands of years ago?! Scary, isn't it! You, I, and Bill can not scientifically prove or disprove, any of this, so we should all hold our judgement of others' beliefs and ideas. I believe there is something behind all of these wonders, and that something is God. One day we will all learn these secrets... or none of us will. In the meantime don't judge what is unprovable nor disprovable.
+Johnny Rondelez
It doesn't describe "evolution" at all, dingus. Genesis describes a series of separate and spontaneous "creation" events, with no inherent ancestry or alleleic variation between generations to produce the speciation that is vital to evolutionary theory. Not only is there no coherent time scale to attribute the "day" to any "age," but the order of events and the described method is wrong as well.
Genesis has the "heavens" and the "earth" being created on the first day, with the sun, moon, and stars being created on the fourth day, In other words, God said, "Let there be light," on the fist day, but made no sun to produce it until the fourth day, so there could be no evening or morning of the first, second, and third days. A popular rationalization is that God produced the "light" himself until he remembered to create the sun, but that is not explained, nor is it anywhere implied.
The way Genesis 1 describes the Earth's formation makes sense if you consider the "firmament" view of cosmology that was so popular at the time. In real life, the sun predated the Earth, just as any star in whatever protoplanetary disk you care to study will precede the formation of it's daughter planets from the gravitational collapse of it's surrounding debris. The moon is slightly younger than the Earth's initial formation, though it has to be conceded that the cataclysmic event which formed the moon from the collision between Earth and the hypothesized planetoid "Theia" would have had the effect of resetting any geologic development, such as the formation of continents, back to a molten state world-wide. It should also be noted, that during the Hadean era when this giant impact would have taken place (according to the leading hypothesis of the moon's origin) Earth was still quite molten, and there would have been no world-wide ocean yet, as Genesis describes. The sun and moon preceded the oceans, in other words.
And this is to say nothing about how Genesis describes parting water from water to create the sky, which is, again, describing the firmament cosmology that was so popular at the time, where the waters above, held up by the firmament, are separated from the waters below by "sky."
The third day has vegetation being produced before there was any sun for photosynthesis. Again, this was before people knew that the Earth orbited the sun, and that the sun itself was responsible for the light of day, and not just a "light in the sky" to separate day and night. The sun brings the day, not the other way around. Without the sun, there IS no day.
Photosynthesis evolved in single-cell micro-organisms long before any land-based vegetation evolved, and even before tectonic activity had raised portions of the plates to form dry land. So there would have to be sunlight before dry land, and before plants, which again, puts Genesis out of order with reality, and out of reach of the "day-age" hypothesis advanced by old-earth creationists, as no meaningful amount of time could have passed without sunlight in such a hypothesis, otherwise all these early photosynthetic organisms would have died out, making God look like an idiot.
Aquatic life evolved long before vegetation on dry ground, again, defying the Genesis narrative. Land animals evolved before birds, as birds are the descendants of dinosaurs, and MAN was not created in God's image, but evolved from prior species of ape which are now extinct. Even though Homo sapiens is a relatively recent species against the age of the earth, and even against other life on this planet, there are also plenty of species YOUNGER than humans.
Woman wouldn't have been created from man's rib either, since as with every other predominantly heterosexual organism on the planet, it is the FEMALE who is the staple of the species, not the male. Some species, such as the New Mexico Whiptail, have evolved to the point where they no longer need males at all to procreate. They are parthenogenic, which is something that HUMANS are incapable of. So no virgin conception either.
Even allowing for one biblical "day" to equate to an "age" in geologic history, none of this matches up with the Genesis narrative.
You are too stone-dumb ignorant of the history of the cosmos, this planet, and life on it to be able to compare Genesis with actual events, and are in no place to determine what Bill Nye or myself can prove or disprove about anything. It is those who know little, not those who know much, who posit this or that will never be solved by science.
science totally is a religion
💀and Bible is a science textbook right
.....care to explain why you think this way?
Bill the fake science guy. Bill, you’ve only got a B.A. in mechanical engineering. When you have an earned doctorate, maybe I’ll listen.
Bill Nye The pretend Science Guy. The pseudo-scientific guy.
I am from the generation of "Watch Mr. Wizard".
FAITH and SCIENCE are tandem. IF SCIENCE is a physical Brain that we can touch, measure, or weigh as evidence,... then FAITH is the MIND, where SCIENCE has in no way of knowing how it actually working. Its like INVISIBLE / VISIBLE where visible stuff is the atom, while the INVISIBLE belongs to Electromagnetic waves or Photons. There's an old saying MIND/ MATTER.
Science does not cover just the natural world. There are sciences that attempt to identify cognitive and emotional processes. These include, but are not limited to, psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science.
THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED A BIBLE, AND BILL, YOU NEED TO READ NOW
If you watch the whole debate he says that he's read it twice.
He has read it and has come to the conclusion any rational mind would. They are stories made up by man.
@@thadaliciousdelicio The stories aren't made up the prophecies are being fulfilled about the foolish who think that way
@@katiefrench5322 Foolish indeed. I have a prophecy. The evil of religious dogma will be the cause of countless wars and suffering of the innocent. Until all people of the world learn to share a collective consciousness there will never be true peace, love, understanding and togetherness. "Those who make you believe absurdities , can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
@@thadaliciousdelicio I don't know if you are making fun of what I believe or not could you please clarify thank you
Dear bill nye the Russian spy, u lost my respect