I had one of these on loan for a couple of years. I found it a very difficult lens to like, although it was almost alright at longer focal lengths. I was unable to get much sharpness at all at the sides of images at wider focal lengths, even when stopped well down, and found the the colour fringing, distortion and vignetting immense at these focal lengths too. To cap it all, the zoom creep was very annoying and it was big and bulky despite its slow aperture and poor performance. People often talk about the 75-300 as being the worst lens Canon ever made, but frankly it's a gem compared to the example of this I used.
I have one for my Canon Rebel T6S (760D) 24MP. IQ is surprisingly good. My Canon T6S (760D) CAN auto correct for Chromatic Aberation (CA), distortion and vignetting. (My older Rebel T2i (18MP) however cannot correct for CA).
I've been using this lens for quite a while now, and despite it's flaws, it's a good lens. I'm thinking about replacing it with a 15-85, but if I can I would rather replace it with the gorgeous 17-55!
I got this thing broken for free when I bought another camera, I opened it and changed the aperture cable that breaks on all of these lenses, so in the end I got this for around 5 bucks :)
I'm currently looking into buying this lens. and watched quite a few video reviews. that were more like a joke than an actual review. I should have known to come to your page for a honest review right away rather wasting my time on the others. as per usual wonderful video and thank you for clearing up any questions at all.
excellent video, Chris. I was about to buy one of this to upgrade my kit lens. Thanks to your review, I will hold off and may look for a telephoto lens instead. I think that will better compliment the kit lens that I have.
if you have a newer camera body T6S (760D) or newer, there is in-camera corrections available for 1. Peripheral illumination 2. Chromatic Aberration 3. Distortion Latest 2022 correction data ifor this lens s available with the latest EOS Utility. Up until 2021, there was no correction data for distorion for THIS lens. My other (older) camera T2i (550d) could only do 1. Peripheral illumination corrections and nothing more.
Pretty good and accurate review. I started calling this lens my _King of CA_ because of the massive ammount of CA at 17mm. I have this lens for some years now and I have to say I never really tried it at 50mm. Currently it is broken (most likely the apature cable), but when it's in good shape again I have to make some images at 50mm.
@@rofiihamdi65 Yes, I still have the lens. However, it has the problem with the broken apature cable so I am not able to select any apature higher than f/4. Considering it's price it's probably not a bad quality to money ratio. Considering it's not so great quality overall it's there are maybe better ones. At wide angles it's not really a good image quality and it shows a lot of CA at high contrast coners. If you want to learn photography this inexpensive lens will do the job. If you want to improve your image quality, this lens is not really the way to go.
KuruGDI Thank you for such a detailed answer. yes, i want to started learn photography. Someone at my town sale DSLR Camera Canon 60d with 18-55mm kit lens, 50mm is ii fix lens, 17-85mm is usm, battery grip, and external flash speedlite evo 700e for $370. He say lcd is vignette but picture still good. is that worth to buy?
@@rofiihamdi65 It's an older setup, but it sounds like a good deal if you are new to photography. Make sure to check the functions of the lenses first before you and over the cash (so mi + man apature, image throgh vrious focal lengths, take pictures to see if there are any scratches in the lens, etc.) And if everything goes wrong it's not that much of a huge loss.
I still have this lens which I used with my Canon 500D. I now have a Canon R10 and perhaps you should d o a review of it with an R series camera? Great video as always.
Thanks! very helpfull! now im confused again lol, need to buy a new lens but not so expensive. Thank you, loved your video, very accurated and easy to understand :)
Hello! I am searching for a good lenses with AF and silent motor for filming beauty and makeup videos. I have a canon 700D. I doubt between this the canon 17-85 or the sigma 18-200 or any other. as I prefer a zoom lenses so I can zoom right to my face, eye o lip to show what I am doing. Which one do you recommend me? Thanks for your videos and I hope you can answer my doubts, thanks!!
Hi Chris. I wanna ask you a question. If we want to compare Sigma 17-70 and Canon 17-85, which do you think is more useful? Especially about each macro performances.
Hi, is the Canon EF-S 17-85 mm only good for outdoor shots? Because I tried shooting indoors with max ISO and f/4 and 1/15 at min, the shots are still underexposed, so I end up using a 50mm prime lens instead which I find is easier to set for right exposure.
I would recommend the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8. Depending on your Camera, the Canon EF-S may not let in enough light for low light situations. Playing around with the ISO can leave you under exposed with extra noise. Better to lengthen your exposure. You can’t beat that Canon 50mm, it’s a fast lens, even better than the Sigma.
I managed to get cinematic scenes off of a kit lens before and this is supposed to be an upgrade to a kit lens so yes, you can make cinematic stuff with this with the right compositions. Tho I would recommend you buy a cheap prime lens like the Yongnuo 50mm 1.8 II if you haven’t already to have a more “cinematic” feel on a budget
How is this for a starter lens? I've been borrowing a friend's DSLR for a few years, and I'm planning on buying one in a few months, but I've been thinking of buying body only and getting a better lens than the stock kit lens that comes with it.
I concur, 17-85 was my first replacement years ago when my kit 18-55 stopped focusing one way. My feeling was mixed, it was my first 300 Eur lens after all and I expected a bit more (especially that CA is striking). But I liked its more universal range over 18-55 and in general was happy. Recently I bought EOS 200D and added 18-135 STM to it - and that one is much better even with way longer range (that 17 vs 18 mm wide end is not that big deal). Yes, it's a bit more pricey, but not that much really. (There is also that nano USM version, again a bit more expensive, I decided for STM version boxed with a hood and I'm very happy.)
hi and thanks for the video, i found this lens for a good occasion price on ebay, it says the autofocus is defect - only manually focus photography possible, do you think would it be anyway worth for me to get the lens? I have a Canon 70D camera with the EF S 18-55 kit lens...other lenses i have are the Canon EF 50mm 1.8, the Canon EF 85mm, and the Canon EF 35-70mm, do you think would this 17-85 add some "up" to my lens acquisitions? Thanks
Hello I just bought a 28-135 canon to upgrade the standard kit of 18-55 for my canon 700d unfortunately the performance of this lenses is very very disappointed. Recently i realized that this lens is ideal for an old film camera and it is an analog lens. Do you have any recommendation for any good lens in a good price? Thanks
Hello, i have a canon 70d eos right now and i am thinking of buying a new lens and i am thinking of either this one or 18-200 f.3.5-5.6 is... What would you recommend?
Would this lens be better then the 18-135 stm for video? I have a 70d I need a good video lens around this focal length. What do you recommend in general if not those two lens?
Good afternoon, I wonder if what I heard is true , I heard that this lens spoils " easily " after a lot of focus and then starts giving errors , ( from what I hear is due to a plastic ring inside the lens that after much focus he wears of ) is it true ?
Hello Christopher i need a lens for my 80d, with standard zoom and also fast aperture and sharp image for making video. Tell me which will be a good choice for that kind of lens and also to have a good stills quality. I have 24mm stm but i want something like all in one lens for video and good picture quality. Is the 18-135 nano usm only good choise for my needs?
Christopher Frost Photography I watched almost all of yours reviews and can't make decision I can sacrifice some mm or aperture and invest some money in lighting but I want a maximum performance in quality of pictures and videos can you advise me?
Christopher Frost Photography for video it's like a weeding stuff, on photography side I need wide angle for landscape and short telephoto for non studio portrait's I know that I'm asking very much , I wonder 24-105 f4 L isn't it a better choice? Or really 18-135 kit with compromise of picture quality?!! I'm really confused
I made this review before the Canon 70D came out, and I don't have the lens to test anymore. An external mix like the Rode VideoMic will help but not totally cut it out, but the microadjustment noises shouldn't really be that bad (I imagine)
Salute and for this video! You help me to take desigin betwen sigma or tamron now i beg you to help me wich one to take: EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM or Canon ef-s 18-135mm is ? thanks alote! Sorry for my bad englsh! (body thinc to be betwen 650 or 60d) :)
Thank you verry much!!! Your advice is great! I like usm but if 18-135 is bete it shoud be this when i buy new body thank you so much !!! btw i will use it for party photography journalism landscape and macro haha but mostli fot partys
@@MrFafcho so how is it? I am in the same position rn hahah should get the (af broken) 17-85mm for 30usd or the 18-135mm is stm for 92usd? I wanna take wide portraits
I have three of these lenses. None of them are 'a bit wobbley' none of them suffer from bad colour fringing or vignetting. Perhaps you tested a dud one.
Every other review on the internet confirms what I found here. You're probably confused about which lens it is or how to test image quality (and why would you have three?!)
shoud i buy this len or noT??my father have the 18-135 but i wand to have my len instead a taking my fathers len everytime i go for photography, what is your opinon ???
+Christopher Frost Photography I did not. It was tempting but i decided to save for something bit better. STM is twice as expensive at the moment in Croatia. This is not bad deal for this USM it is 100 punds off.. I use 50 STM mostly and now i need something for wider shots.. Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 is in my reach and i think it will be mine with next pay check..
@@cesarevertolo9359 Sorry. Did you buy the lens? What camera(s) do you have? I like the EF-S 17-85 IS USM. My 24MP 760D (T6S) has corrections even for Chromatic aberations (CA) for this lens and gives very sharp images. Lens did not work as for m 550D (T2I) with no CA corrections and poorer AF because of less focusing points and less sensitive sensor. EF-S 17-85 IS USM works very well with Cheap 67mm +4 +2 and +1 closeup filters singly and in combination so up to +7. +10 filter does not work because of too much distortions. Close-up filters work much better than extension tubes for this lens.
@@amamboom9893 YES, it will work on the 550D - BUT newer body like my 760D has in-camera corrections for Chromatic Aberations for this lens but my 550D cannot correct for Chromatic Aberations. Both can correct for distortion and vignetting.
I remember owning this lens, immediately the ribbon cable failed. I rebuilt it, but it was always a poor quality image...it reminded me of 90's Tamaron junk. Avoid. Buy Sigma, or just stick with the kit lens :(
Your channel is one of the best for anyone looking for good lens reviews. Thanks!
I had one of these on loan for a couple of years. I found it a very difficult lens to like, although it was almost alright at longer focal lengths. I was unable to get much sharpness at all at the sides of images at wider focal lengths, even when stopped well down, and found the the colour fringing, distortion and vignetting immense at these focal lengths too. To cap it all, the zoom creep was very annoying and it was big and bulky despite its slow aperture and poor performance.
People often talk about the 75-300 as being the worst lens Canon ever made, but frankly it's a gem compared to the example of this I used.
I have one for my Canon Rebel T6S (760D) 24MP. IQ is surprisingly good. My Canon T6S (760D) CAN auto correct for Chromatic Aberation (CA), distortion and vignetting.
(My older Rebel T2i (18MP) however cannot correct for CA).
I've been using this lens for quite a while now, and despite it's flaws, it's a good lens. I'm thinking about replacing it with a 15-85, but if I can I would rather replace it with the gorgeous 17-55!
I have just seen your flickr photostream and wow, you are an amazing photographer. That makes these videos even better.
I got this thing broken for free when I bought another camera, I opened it and changed the aperture cable that breaks on all of these lenses, so in the end I got this for around 5 bucks :)
I have the same problem. PLease tell me you bought the apature cable :)
I did not wait, and I bought a refurb version of the 17-85 for $159, and it is excellent and the IQ is also better than I expected.
Calm down. I needed my 60D to record video in that shot
I'm currently looking into buying this lens. and watched quite a few video reviews. that were more like a joke than an actual review. I should have known to come to your page for a honest review right away rather wasting my time on the others. as per usual wonderful video and thank you for clearing up any questions at all.
excellent video, Chris. I was about to buy one of this to upgrade my kit lens. Thanks to your review, I will hold off and may look for a telephoto lens instead. I think that will better compliment the kit lens that I have.
Iam using it for carphotography (light painting). The lens is very sharp and the focalrange is perfect special for carphotograpy 👍
if you have a newer camera body T6S (760D) or newer, there is in-camera corrections available for
1. Peripheral illumination
2. Chromatic Aberration
3. Distortion
Latest 2022 correction data ifor this lens s available with the latest EOS Utility. Up until 2021, there was no correction data for distorion for THIS lens.
My other (older) camera T2i (550d) could only do
1. Peripheral illumination corrections and nothing more.
Pretty good and accurate review.
I started calling this lens my _King of CA_ because of the massive ammount of CA at 17mm.
I have this lens for some years now and I have to say I never really tried it at 50mm. Currently it is broken (most likely the apature cable), but when it's in good shape again I have to make some images at 50mm.
KuruGDI do you still have that lens? how it perform right now? i have a plan to buy that lens for $130.
@@rofiihamdi65 Yes, I still have the lens. However, it has the problem with the broken apature cable so I am not able to select any apature higher than f/4.
Considering it's price it's probably not a bad quality to money ratio. Considering it's not so great quality overall it's there are maybe better ones.
At wide angles it's not really a good image quality and it shows a lot of CA at high contrast coners. If you want to learn photography this inexpensive lens will do the job. If you want to improve your image quality, this lens is not really the way to go.
KuruGDI Thank you for such a detailed answer.
yes, i want to started learn photography.
Someone at my town sale DSLR Camera Canon 60d with 18-55mm kit lens, 50mm is ii fix lens, 17-85mm is usm, battery grip, and external flash speedlite evo 700e for $370. He say lcd is vignette but picture still good. is that worth to buy?
@@rofiihamdi65 It's an older setup, but it sounds like a good deal if you are new to photography.
Make sure to check the functions of the lenses first before you and over the cash (so mi + man apature, image throgh vrious focal lengths, take pictures to see if there are any scratches in the lens, etc.)
And if everything goes wrong it's not that much of a huge loss.
love your reviews you deserve more subscribers
i got that one a while back for my xti and bought the canon eos m mount adapter so i can use it with the canon eos m. fun times.
I still have this lens which I used with my Canon 500D. I now have a Canon R10 and perhaps you should d o a review of it with an R series camera? Great video as always.
Thanks! very helpfull! now im confused again lol, need to buy a new lens but not so expensive. Thank you, loved your video, very accurated and easy to understand :)
Hello! I am searching for a good lenses with AF and silent motor for filming beauty and makeup videos. I have a canon 700D. I doubt between this the canon 17-85 or the sigma 18-200 or any other. as I prefer a zoom lenses so I can zoom right to my face, eye o lip to show what I am doing.
Which one do you recommend me?
Thanks for your videos and I hope you can answer my doubts, thanks!!
U can buy 50 mm 1.8 cheap and sharp but not too slilent
Hi Chris. I wanna ask you a question. If we want to compare Sigma 17-70 and Canon 17-85, which do you think is more useful? Especially about each macro performances.
Check out my review of the Sigma 17-70. I'd say the Sigma will be the better lens in most ways
+Christopher Frost Photography Thanks alot for your attention.
this is so random i was literally out infront of Canterbury Cathedral today taking pictures - and that's where you were doing your video
I'm taking some more around there tomorrow with a couple of lenses, coincidentally enough
which one would you buy. this one or the updated one. is the updated one worth the higher price?
fantastic information, presented very well
Thanks very much :)
I've had three of these and they all have broken the aperture cable eventually. Pretty inconvenient but they are easy to come by on eBay.
comoare to 18-13m stm ?
Hi, is the Canon EF-S 17-85 mm only good for outdoor shots? Because I tried shooting indoors with max ISO and f/4 and 1/15 at min, the shots are still underexposed, so I end up using a 50mm prime lens instead which I find is easier to set for right exposure.
Also, is this lens recommended for photography with moving subjects? Thanks really!
I would recommend the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8. Depending on your Camera, the Canon EF-S may not let in enough light for low light situations. Playing around with the ISO can leave you under exposed with extra noise. Better to lengthen your exposure. You can’t beat that Canon 50mm, it’s a fast lens, even better than the Sigma.
So compared to a 40x zoom what would this be ???
thank you for this review .. what lenses do you recommend for food photography ?
All kinds of lenses. The 50mm f/1.8 STM would do quite a nice job
Christopher Frost Photography thanks a lot
Подскажите.Какой камерой снимали видео это и каким объективом?
i m thinking on buying this or the tamron 17-50. which one do you recommend, i have a 600d. love your vids ;)
They're quite different lenses. I'd go for the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS
Excellent video thanks for uploading.
How does it compare to the 15-85 canon and based on the price difference which one would you use. I will put it on a 60D or the 70D, as I own both.
+Michael Didomenico As I say at the end of this video, the 15-85 is better in almost every way. Personally I'd save up for the 15-85
+Christopher Frost Photography my thoughts exactly.
Hi, I'm a beginner, can you tell me if this lens can shoot cinematic videos?
I managed to get cinematic scenes off of a kit lens before and this is supposed to be an upgrade to a kit lens so yes, you can make cinematic stuff with this with the right compositions.
Tho I would recommend you buy a cheap prime lens like the Yongnuo 50mm 1.8 II if you haven’t already to have a more “cinematic” feel on a budget
How is this for a starter lens? I've been borrowing a friend's DSLR for a few years, and I'm planning on buying one in a few months, but I've been thinking of buying body only and getting a better lens than the stock kit lens that comes with it.
+gibusgamer93 Watch the review, and you'll see! I think the Canon 18-135mm STM is a lot better
I concur, 17-85 was my first replacement years ago when my kit 18-55 stopped focusing one way. My feeling was mixed, it was my first 300 Eur lens after all and I expected a bit more (especially that CA is striking). But I liked its more universal range over 18-55 and in general was happy. Recently I bought EOS 200D and added 18-135 STM to it - and that one is much better even with way longer range (that 17 vs 18 mm wide end is not that big deal). Yes, it's a bit more pricey, but not that much really. (There is also that nano USM version, again a bit more expensive, I decided for STM version boxed with a hood and I'm very happy.)
hi and thanks for the video, i found this lens for a good occasion price on ebay, it says the autofocus is defect - only manually focus photography possible, do you think would it be anyway worth for me to get the lens? I have a Canon 70D camera with the EF S 18-55 kit lens...other lenses i have are the Canon EF 50mm 1.8, the Canon EF 85mm, and the Canon EF 35-70mm, do you think would this 17-85 add some "up" to my lens acquisitions? Thanks
Well, if you don't mind manual focus only, then you could get this lens and get rid of the 18-55 and the 35-70
Ik this is old but is it good with a 7d?
Did you ever find out??? I have a 7D as well.
With canon 60D for taking a video, for vloging and cinematic video,, would you recommend this one or sigma 17-50mm?
This lens will have quieter autofocus
Should I buy the Canon 17-85, 18-135, or the 24-85
Arran Clarke what did you end up getting?
Hello I just bought a 28-135 canon to upgrade the standard kit of 18-55 for my canon 700d unfortunately the performance of this lenses is very very disappointed. Recently i realized that this lens is ideal for an old film camera and it is an analog lens. Do you have any recommendation for any good lens in a good price? Thanks
Couple of good options: the Canon 15-85, 18-135mm STM
Christopher Thanks for your reply i just bought in good price the 18-135 is not stm version Do you think is uncotpatible for my 700d body?
Hello, i have a canon 70d eos right now and i am thinking of buying a new lens and i am thinking of either this one or 18-200 f.3.5-5.6 is... What would you recommend?
I would personally go for the 18-200
@@christopherfrost
thank you very much!
Would this lens be better then the 18-135 stm for video? I have a 70d I need a good video lens around this focal length. What do you recommend in general if not those two lens?
The 18-135 STM would be quite a bit better
How good is this lens for video? Or should I go for the sigma 17-70 or 17-50?? Great channel!
+Olle Olsson The Canon 15-85 would be best
+Christopher Frost Photography can you see chromatic aberration in video too?
+Olle Olsson With the 15-85? It might be a little noticeable but not a serious problem
+Christopher Frost Photography I mean with the 17-85mm?
+Olle Olsson You'll get away with it, just about :-)
Is this Lens suitable to use it when outdoor photo shoot? And suitable with 500D canon camera??
Yes and yes
Good afternoon, I wonder if what I heard is true , I heard that this lens spoils " easily " after a lot of focus and then starts giving errors , ( from what I hear is due to a plastic ring inside the lens that after much focus he wears of ) is it true ?
Yes, its already happened to me unfortunately. But keeping in mind I've had this lens for quite a while now and it's pretty great to use
+ministryofgirl
It is expensive to repair?
My mother-in-law had one that started failing (after about 7 years of heavy use) and it cost her about £70 to get it repaired
Do you think I should by the canon 17-85mm, 24-85mm or the slightly more expensive 18-135mm stm.
What did you geeet?
@@mac8806 Long time ago but I got the 18-135mm. Well worth it and probably pretty cheap used right now.
Hello Christopher i need a lens for my 80d, with standard zoom and also fast aperture and sharp image for making video. Tell me which will be a good choice for that kind of lens and also to have a good stills quality. I have 24mm stm but i want something like all in one lens for video and good picture quality. Is the 18-135 nano usm only good choise for my needs?
You want a fast standard zoom lens. Check out the big comparison video I made. The Canon 17-55 IS USM is a good option
Christopher Frost Photography I watched almost all of yours reviews and can't make decision I can sacrifice some mm or aperture and invest some money in lighting but I want a maximum performance in quality of pictures and videos can you advise me?
Todor Vlasev It's really up to you and the exact kind of video / photography work you want to do. The Canon 17-55 f/2.8 is a great all-rounder
Christopher Frost Photography for video it's like a weeding stuff, on photography side I need wide angle for landscape and short telephoto for non studio portrait's I know that I'm asking very much , I wonder 24-105 f4 L isn't it a better choice? Or really 18-135 kit with compromise of picture quality?!! I'm really confused
I would just go for the 17-55 with its wider aperture
ER, you said 60D in the video but had the Lens mounted on a 50D?
hi. I have a Canon 60D. Which lens is better? EF 28-135 or this one? Thanks
This 17-85. Take a look at my reviews to see why
You mention good video but how do you get past the USM sounds? External Mic?
I made this review before the Canon 70D came out, and I don't have the lens to test anymore. An external mix like the Rode VideoMic will help but not totally cut it out, but the microadjustment noises shouldn't really be that bad (I imagine)
Thanks for reply. The motor sounds are extremely loud. Check you tube for some examples. I need to focus manually to film with this lens.
Hello. Thank you for video. :)
is this lens support for full-frame sensor camera?
No, it's sized for an APS-C sensor, and has an EF-S mount.
Could you please show me how you took videos with it ?
Read your camera's instruction manual - all the information you need should be in there
Does it work with mirrorless with adapter?
It's a DSLR lens so you will need an adaptor
what quality is better, 18-135 or 17-85, i wanna take 17-85 but i really freak to take it
The 18-135 STM is a little better, the normal 18-135 is a little worse
Thanks Chris but i buy the 17-50mm f/2.8 from Tamron i saw the review and the quality is much better thanks a lot again!!!!!
Salute and for this video! You help me to take desigin betwen sigma or tamron now i beg you to help me wich one to take: EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM or Canon ef-s 18-135mm is ? thanks alote! Sorry for my bad englsh! (body thinc to be betwen 650 or 60d) :)
The 17-85 has better build quality, the 18-135mm better zoom range. Go for the new 18-135mm IS 'STM' if you can, as it has improved build quality :-)
Thank you verry much!!! Your advice is great! I like usm but if 18-135 is bete it shoud be this when i buy new body thank you so much !!! btw i will use it for party photography journalism landscape and macro haha but mostli fot partys
@@MrFafcho so how is it? I am in the same position rn hahah should get the (af broken) 17-85mm for 30usd or the 18-135mm is stm for 92usd? I wanna take wide portraits
@@mac8806 I would take 18-135 :) btw from this year i switched to 6D MK II with 24-105 lense :)
@@MrFafcho thanks! Have you tried the tamron 17-50mm? If yes do you recommend it over 18-135? 😆
Excellent review but the background music is extremely high making difficult to hear your voice, You DON'T need such an awful distraction.
I have three of these lenses. None of them are 'a bit wobbley' none of them suffer from bad colour fringing or vignetting. Perhaps you tested a dud one.
Every other review on the internet confirms what I found here. You're probably confused about which lens it is or how to test image quality (and why would you have three?!)
Is this in Ipswich???
would this make a good upgrade to the 18-55 IS?
+Ryan Millar It would be a little bit of an upgrade. I'd just go straight for the 15-85, or the 18-135 STM
hello to everyone im loking for a lens to my camera i found this len for about 150euro -135 pounts(used) should i buy this???I need your help ...
That's a reasonably good deal
shoud i buy this len or noT??my father have the 18-135 but i wand to have my len instead a taking my fathers len everytime i go for photography, what is your opinon ???
I personally prefer the Canon 18-135 STM. You'll have to save up more, though
thanks for your help,have a good day
Tell me.Which camera filmed this video and what lens?
I /think/ it was my Canon 60D and the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
is this a good lens for portraits?
+Jonny Brooks Not especially. Try a lens with a fast aperture like a 50mm f/1.8 STM
I will buy this lens tomorrow for round 180 pounds new in shop. It will be upgrade for kit lens...
+roki977 Did you get it? If not, I think you might be slightly happier with the Canon 18-135mm STM
+Christopher Frost Photography I did not. It was tempting but i decided to save for something bit better. STM is twice as expensive at the moment in Croatia. This is not bad deal for this USM it is 100 punds off.. I use 50 STM mostly and now i need something for wider shots.. Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 is in my reach and i think it will be mine with next pay check..
does this work on canon 6d??
Nope. Canon's EF-S lenses do not work on their full-frame cameras
Does it support nd or polarizer filters?
YES!
67mm ND or Polarising Filters work on my 17-85mm.
@@set3777 thanks, a bit late though
@@cesarevertolo9359 Sorry.
Did you buy the lens? What camera(s) do you have?
I like the EF-S 17-85 IS USM. My 24MP 760D (T6S) has corrections even for Chromatic aberations (CA) for this lens and gives very sharp images. Lens did not work as for m 550D (T2I) with no CA corrections and poorer AF because of less focusing points and less sensitive sensor. EF-S 17-85 IS USM works very well with Cheap 67mm +4 +2 and +1 closeup filters singly and in combination so up to +7. +10 filter does not work because of too much distortions. Close-up filters work much better than extension tubes for this lens.
I watched a few more videos and stood silently corrected. Ps. You're eloquent!
does this work with the 6d
It's an EF-S lens, so no
+Christopher Frost Photography will it work on a 550d?
@@amamboom9893 YES, it will work on the 550D - BUT newer body like my 760D has in-camera corrections for Chromatic Aberations for this lens but my 550D cannot correct for Chromatic Aberations. Both can correct for distortion and vignetting.
Thanks for the decent review.
its, and ok, lens the only problem I have with it is when you are at 17mm it Barrel's out at the Top!!!!
I remember owning this lens, immediately the ribbon cable failed. I rebuilt it, but it was always a poor quality image...it reminded me of 90's Tamaron junk. Avoid. Buy Sigma, or just stick with the kit lens :(
Based on this review, I don't see this lens as worth owning. I'd rather spend the money and get quality glass.
I got it for 5 euro, autofocus doesnt work, but iq is verry good for the price.
Turn of the Bloody music. GEEEEEEEZ
nice work. be careful when you film people in the street, we recognize their faces. except that, i like your point of view
酷い訛りだ