I started watching this several weeks ago to get my mind off the shit show that's going on in the U.S and have to admit that Parliament is quite lively. U.S politics is positively boring when compared to this.
Can you not see that Boris is trying to get Brexit through, which got the most votes in the referendum. It's the Labour party, Lib Dems, etc that are being undemocratic and looking to stop Brexit and democracy by any means possible
@@stopmasshysteria5757 I don't know what Boris is trying to do. No one voted for a no deal BREXIT which would damage the UK. Boris should get a new deal, if he can, and present it to Parliament. If he can't do this, or refuses to do this, he should step aside.
@@brachiator1 the remainers don't want any kind of a deal. All they want to do is to dismiss the electorate and cancel Brexit. Personally I think that's what they're after, and I'm not alone in that view. It's very similar to the US Presidential election in 2016 where the Democrats can't and won't accept defeat
Why are so many MPs emotional snowflakes? All about feeling and emotion. No logic nor rationality nor reasonable cooperation . We voted to leave. STOP frustrating it.
I'm sick of it. Where's Cromwell or Guy Fawkes when you need them. This is homegrown meaningless and pointless dangerous politics and nothing more. The UK was operating fine until the Tories cooked up this fiasco. There are bigger issues that should be addressed by government. As Richard Attenborough makes crystal clear.
Well, he'll have to. Stands to reason. As he was only flogging the Leave thing as a little career move to begin with ... He's a blow with the wind type of guy who doesn't believe in anything and now he's got to get on with Brexit Shit!
@@Fireglo Yes you can. Someone commits an action, society considers the act so heinous, that it then gets codified into law as a *named crime* so that the person can be punished. People were being killed by other people long before the crime of murder existed, then society realised people killing other people without consequence was a bad thing so it was made into a named crime in order to punish the offenders. Very rarely does a society predefine a crime before that act has ever been commited.
Anyone who voted did so based on their opinion. If they were stupid enough to believe one set of lies then they would also be stupid enough to believe another equal set of lies. The fact remains that the majority of people voted to leave.
@@mrgame-man5792 yh I understand and agree with what your saying and I agree that too many people voted on an "opinion" which was slowly hypnotised into them over the year running up to the result.
5:29 Johnson: 'I think the court was wrong to pronounce on what is essentially a political question at a time of great national controversy.' Well, 11 out of 11 supreme court judges disagree with you and they are far more qualified and believable to know what they are doing than you are. Besides, it is very poor statesmanship to be seen openly criticising and disagreeing with the highest court in the land when they have already passed judgement even if that judgement happens to be at odds with your personal and political beliefs. A good statesman would want his citizens to accept court rulings, especially those cases the citizen lost and generally respect the judges. One has to lead by example.
Yet the High Court took the opposite view and in this verdict there were curious undertones which suggested the 11 were well aware they were on dangerous ground - another reason why they had to make it unanimous. I believe more in Reece-Mogg who has an encyclopaedic knowledge of our Constitution but I watch even more for Dr Davi Starkey's comments when they come, I think on RUclips where he has a number of fantastic posts . Bercow an ape, Dominic Grieve a s... and even has a go at the Royals. Will be very much on the look-out for that.
@@jamesdouglaswhittaker6645 It was proper for the Supreme Court to hear the matter. The Scottish Court of Session ruled one way, the High Court ruled another. I would take the knowledge and expertise of the 11 Justices of the Supreme Court over that of the High Court as they are generally some of the most knowledgeable of the UK Constitution. The Rt. Hon. Rees-Mogg is not a lawyer. Even though he is a very eloquent speaker and well educated, he has not gone through legal education. This is poignant, as the UK Constitution is uncodified (as in, it is spread over many documents instead of a single document, i.e. The US Constitution). There are several documents that provide the basis for the UK's Constitution, including the Magna Carta (1215) and the Bill of Rights (1689) straight through to the EU Withdrawal Act (2020).
@@paulholmes8211 Their positions on the subject of Brexit are relatively unknown. As true Justices, they made their ruling on the facts from the lower courts, the evidence of those lower courts, and the testimony and arguments before them.
I believe that Parliament is supposed to represent the public, they seem to think that they have the right to ignore the rights unless they actually agree with the decision that they make. This situation is very dangerous, have the public got any rights or not?
Grovelling to a panel of judges (how did they get to be appointed??) So the Chartrists were wrong sufragettes were wrong anyone opposing the Nuremburg laws were wrong for braking the law of the land? The law is ALWAYS by deifntion "right" is that it?
@@MrYorickJenkins He was found to have broken the law in two courts ( the Court of Session the highest civil court in Scotland and the Supreme Court the highest court in the UK) Three judges in the Court of Session and eleven judges of the Supreme Court unanimously found Boris Johnson to have mislead the Queen and broken the law. Boris Johnson thinks he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges of the UK. He is mad.
Boris probably thought it was all done and dusted.Insisting his move was legal against the opinion of a panel of judges reminds me of what's happening with his bouffant headed counterpart on the other side of the ocean. Give him an inch and he'll take a mile. And then what? You can't get much done in a climate of discord. Quite frankly I don't think Boris is the right man for the task in front of him. A lot can happen in a week.
This poltiical court set up in 2009 on the American model should be dismantled. Does anyone know hwho is even eligible to join the little panel of judges? Who appointed them? As it is a poltical tool, why should he not disagree with its decisions?
Yorick Jenkins Carry on disputing this Boris. Nadira Singh (aka Millar) is backed by money from business who wish to remain anonymous but we all know who they are don’t we!
He was found to have broken the law by the 3 judges of the Court of Session and the 11 judges of the supreme court. Boris Johnson after being found to have broken the law says that he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges in the UK. He is mad.
He’s provoked sharp anger here in Ireland by constantly referring to ‘the surrender act’, and similar hostile language. Britain’s fellow EU members are not a hostile force - an enemy - to be resisted and fought against, including us, the country with the most complex, and frequently violent history and ties with Britain. To use such language engenders a hostility towards the Eu, and her citizens, that feeds straight into toxic far-right extremism in Britain and elsewhere, and could spur on violent extremists or lunatics into attacks on ‘the other’, which would also include British politicians (not necessarily those opposing Brexit). One might expect a similar amount of silent anger across other Eu states over such intemperate language, while we, of course, continue to note the utter lack of a solution to the Northern Ireland Border Issue, despite the dishonest claims of ‘progress’ being made - our own Tanaiste (Deputy PM) this week called the proposed plans and solutions “fanciful”. Once again, it seems, the British public are not being given an honest account of the true failure to meet Brexit realities.
It is indeed a surrender act - I see no animosity to the eu nations, only the eu. Do you not see the discontent in those eu nations toward the eu organisation? It is corrupt in that it's books have not been signed off for years and, with the new leadership being such a corrupt and incompetent lot, I expect nothing to change until it collapses altogether. There is no chance of a deal while the UK in within the eu. Common (business) sense can only prevail when money is at stake as the UK is the largest customer of the eu and their businesses will be able to drive deals properly.
You have something very wrong here. The recent actions and language from the EU is hostile and under no considerations whatsoever can the recent attitudes of Verhofstadt - coupled with his strident language in a speech (the like of which I hoped never to hear again) announcing this vision of an 'Empire" of their dreams. At last the reality is being revealed - but only so perilously close to the full implementation of the Lisbon Treaty in 2020. So close and so permanently binding all participants to the yoke of this undemocratic, protectionist Union administered and directed from one Central Control over-riding individual Governments. Until the full extent of this "dream" - or nightmare as sometimes perceived - is fully studied and completely understood ( and few have done so) the end effect of it's impact on the lives of ordinary people cannot be appreciated. The highly emotional chatter over Brexit is drowning out the reality of the end game, the end impact on our lives. The slowly constricting controls will prove tighter on our children and even more binding on our children's children. I ask you Ver Coda to consider this: - The highly commendable original EEC plan was for an group of Countries to join into into a barrier free, tariff free , mutually profitable,purely trading Association. The expectation was that this would also promote friendships and peace throughout war torn Europe..Brilliant. So how is it that this peace promoting ideal has, in less than half a lifetime, morphed into a burgeoning 'Empire' now hell bent on building an Army prepared for war ? Why are it's member States split between well off and broken Countries (under a flawed Euro and imposed controls, both political and economic)-now pressing for a return to Nationalism and their original currency.. This has not happened by accident. Rules and currencies can be amended to suit circumstances and help friends in need -if the will is there. So the will is not there. . Is that sensible let alone friendship? Or...... Ireland may well have special concerns. Among friends and those of good intent they are not insurmountable. Given time. Among friends reach special understandings.. Any return to violence would be deplorable but in truth it will not happen unless men of violence. wish it. There is no need for that, particularly if the future is assured through right decisions based on thorough understandings of all circumstance. .
It is not a question of the EU being an enemy. It is simply that most people in the UK do not wish to be part of the ever closer political union to which the current EU leadership is clearly committed. Having said that, the EU's strategy in the Brexit negotiations has done nothing to allay perceptions that it is determined to make the UK pay a heavy price for leaving and this has fomented much of the hostility to which you refer. As an EU without the UK will become an organisation in which three countries will have to subsidise the other 24 for the forseeable future, it would be much more sensible for the EU leaders to agree to a separation that minimises any adverse economic consequences for both sides.
@@gellideggti Fuck Joining the EU. We go independent and sell our water. The way global warming is going Scotlands water will be worth more than the worlds oil, Clowns at Westminster or Europe start their shite then they can die of thirst
@@Mariaf12 Democracy is a 2% majority on a non-binding referendum three years ago in which almost none of the voters could have had any idea what the actual results of a yes vote would mean?
@@kirkkerman I voted leave , and i want to leave without a deal..most brexiteers want to leave without a deal, the remainers would rather stay in a corrupt establishment paying over billion pounds a month. the majority rules, but your all sore losers
He's got his back against the wall and is now desperately pandering to the far right. I was in the states during the lead up and election of Trump and the similarities are uncanny.
Why is he a prat. He is clumsy and not the world's best speaker but at least he is trying to bring this overlong saga to an end and fulfil the undertakings which parliament has made
@@nicholasdickens2801 what is his own ends? Hes in the top job in the land. Theres no career move from here. He just recognises the blindingly obvious. We need to get on with Brexit. Its been 3.5 years. He wants to get back to his normal job of governing the UK.
Manus Macgearailt: Here let me have a go.... “In the mid 2010s David Cameron the Conservative PM under pressure of losing voters to the growing UKIP party called a “binding” IN / OUT public referendum on membership of the EU. The country narrowly voted to leave and this began more than a decade of political division eventually causing the break up of the United Kingdom, destroyed the Conservative and Labour parties leaving a political vacuum that paved the way for the rise of the populist parties.” - Pessimistic Nostradamus 27th September 2039
A Its true now the supreme court as stepped in where going to go the american route now with laws every time opposition is not happy lets take it to court ,now the eu have said since may signed the treaty they will not open it they want to keep us in with the back stop we voted leave but mp's are putting the careers before the country ,places that voted leave have remain mps and vice versus as a labour voter its now gone I've never voted torie in twenty years but i will this time corybyn as killed the labour party i once loved,call,a vote of no confidence
the other parties, the smaller parties? That’s just shows his disrespect for Parliament. He’ll be laughing on the other side of one of his two faces when they support a vote of no confidence in him and his rotting government. Oh, and another thing. The Supreme Court decision has absolutely nothing to do with Brexit. As everybody in country knows, except him, it was to do with his own deceit and his breaking the law by lying to the Queen and Parliament. So there.
boris...problem is the people do not feel the same about Brexit as they did 3 years ago! they've seen some of the shady deals proposed, the predictions and the shear reality of the unknown has categorically sunk any hope whatsoever of a positive outcome. that's what's going on today! (boris...you keep referring to the state of the country 3 years ago when the vote was taken) boris...it's like the honeymoon is over, reality has set in and the people deserve another go at whether they indeed want to exit the EU.
@@sophiadaly4712 Because people change their minds. Especially when they start living the reality of what it means and what the potential consequences will mean to the country. You are or should be allowed to change you mind. It's a human trait.
@@checkeredflagfilms TBH I think there are much more people now that will vote leave rather than remain, so its just another time waster. Get with the program man. 31/10/19 come what may(with a deal)
@Elizabeth Vincent - I don't remember feeling we were being ruled by the EU for the last 40 years. Are you saying that we have had no control over our fate since we joined the EU? I seem to recall a lot of times when the United Kingdom reacted powerfully and with great force over the past decades - for better or worse.
@RoadKillzine I'm open minded. If you're right then what's going on in parliament is taking away all of Johnson's ammunition. The 'We will leave with or without a deal at the end of October' argument does have gumption. So, if you're right, all this fuss - which he tried to avoid by closing parliament - is disempowering him. I'm taking on board what you've said, and I appreciate the response, but know I'm very confused as to where I stand on this!
All this bluster will not stop the legacy of this party and our PM from being defined by their actions. The ones with honour were removed or removed themselves. When history is written the executive, leader and the compliant will be noted as nothing but a stain on this country - an embarrassment we wish we could forget.
History isn’t a singular narrative - it’s a variety of interpretations. Parliament delaying, time wasting, both parties just being obsolete? All those reasons and numerous others will be considered. Personally - I wager they’ll be pretty scathing to everyone and everything involved.
Sir Humphrey Appleby - I agree, with little but a flimsy ideology to hide behind, that is slowly disintegrating, I don’t give them much hope. It is hardly our proudest moment, and I wouldn’t like the job of painting over those cracks.
@@watercolourmark - I wouldn't wish for a facade to be put up, I only wish people would stop using this right side of history nonsense - none of us possess an faultless crystal ball.
Sir Humphrey Appleby - but it is metaphor. The right side of history means the right side of right, what people mean when they say history will paint them as a stain is, I don’t want to live in a future that doesn’t frown upon such wrongdoings. Sure, history could paint Boris Johnson as a genius hero, but you wouldn’t take that to Ladbrokes, would you? It is usually the liberal and good that go down well, does history have a favourite right-wing cock? Statistically, I doubt he will be the first.
@@watercolourmark - I think there are plenty of people on the right wing who are well respected and get a favourable hearing in the history books, it all depends on your own perception of what is right and wrong. Again some people for example think Bismarck was wonderful ; others hate his guts. The same could be said of any important leader. Is Al Johnson my favourite person - no. Do I think he has a less than ideal hand in trying to get a parliament overwhelmingly in favour of remain to deliver our exit - certainly. We are going to have to accept that if parliament continues to subvert a democratic excercise, the executive will need to get more and more underhanded in response.
The Traitorous Remainer Parliamentarians have smashed that. No- one could get a deal while these dirty tricks are being played against the Prime Minister. Don’t blame Boris. He should be proud of his determination to honour the people’s vote. Let’s hope he does it!
Boris Johnson has no deal, and has less of month to get one. It took three years to get BREXIT deal UK got, which so far has been rejected by Parliment.
Just like the BBC blame Boris for the tone of Parliament when he was only replying to a barrage of abuse, Boris is saying what the people think, the reason MP's are being threatened is because they are frustrating the will of the people and the public are furious, we voted for no deal and they are trying to get that option removed then they will never vote for any deal, so it will become a stalemate, who's devious now?
So they are free to call Boris anything they want and all thats reported is that Boris used the word 'Surrender' and thats hate speech, Naga Manchette has been reprimanded for her comments towards Trump and he is also being misquoted, he said 'if the 4 think America is so terrible the why don't they go back to the countries they came from and see how they like it there' but the BBC reports that he told them to 'go back to their own countries' Naga.
If it's so vital the referendum be respected, why was it an advisory, non binding referendum? It's almost like the governement wanted to give themselves a get out clause, if the british public make a decision thats not in their best interest.
@@prodigiii712 sooooo Tony Blair thought, nearly a decade ago: "Maybe at some point in the future, there might be a referendum on the EU, and then some contrived issue related to that will come before this new court.. Better ask every candidate their opinion on the EU and appoint a whole court on this one hypothetical future case... just in case? "
@@prodigiii712 And that besides the fact that ten of the judges were invested under a conservative prime minister and six of those under Theresa May alone?
This fool is so ill prepared to lead it’s insane 😂 Can’t even deliver a decent Brexit and promises a bright and successful future for the country. Time will tell Mr Johnson. Time will tell.
Katia Ferreira And whose fault is that? I am so disgusted in the remainer parliamentarians. They are nothing but traitors wanting to give our country away to a Federal Union. The EU have already started getting ready to take our army over. They have conscription. I sincerely hope that you do not have any young men in your family. Our Great Britain lost enough young men in the last war. Our soldiers have already been sent to the Ukraine. We must leave. We joined a Common Market. We did not join to give our country away to this Federal Union. I just don’t understand you people.
Not to insult your intelligence but he is literally the Prime Minister ... your average lawyer would find it difficult to become even a government minister. He is also certainly more educated and experienced in UK and EU law than your average lawyer. ...from someone training to become 'your average lawyer'.
Please Enlighten me how I can be wrong. 1. There was precedent made before where Parliament did indeed use Proroguing for frustrating parliament. This was presented by the lawyer defending the government. Where was the consideration for that precedent in this judgement? Why was it dulled void and not relevant to said judgement? 2. The judges decided they have the power to subjectively decide if the length and reasons for the Proroguing are lawful. Isn't this dangerous territory for our courts to be in? Everything political should be of the decisions and influence of government only. 3. Now that judges have decided you can't frustrate parliament by using proroguing by cherry picking certain precedents and disregarding others. Can we hold accountable previous PM's that have ''abused'' its power such as John Major. John Major was a supporter for this case, which is ironic.
@Ari Onassis-Sugen Boris Johnson was found to have mislead the Queen and broke the law by 3 judges of the court of session. He was then found to have broken the law by 11 judges of the Supreme Court. Fourteen of the top judges in the UK unanimously found that Boris Johnson broke the law by closing down parliament. But Boris Johnson says that they were wrong, why would anyone believe a word he says.
Parliaments job is to be representatives of the constituencies that voted for them. 270 constituencies voted Leave in the 2016 referendum. Were are the 270 brexiteer MP’s ?
@Yattaman The quickest path to stability is revoking Article 50 otherwise you are absolutely correct. It's just the start of a long meaningless and pointless path to correct the problems this has created.
Cameron hit the nuclear Brexit button because the Tories were haemorrhaging votes to UKIP and has set the country down this path of division. All it’s done is unbottle the nationalistic genie which now can’t ever be put back. I agree that this will rumble on for years and could well cause the break up of the union... but I don’t suppose that bothers some people as long as it fulfils the “will of the people”.
Im baffled by his declarations. How low can he sincerely fall before he is voted out. His programme for post brexit is a bloody joke that benefits only the investors.
He and his party has bloody already dissappointed his supposed people, he has repeteadly hasnt cared for his people. And never will since the brexiteers aint his people the bankers the elite as he has proven all time along.
Boris Johnson was found to have broken the law by the 3 judges of the court of session and the 11 judges of the supreme court. Boris Johnson thinks he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges of the UK. He is a nutter.
Don’t resign Boris. We need to get out and fast before they steal our army and take our young people to war whether they want to go or not. Conscription is coming. This is NOT SCAREMONGERING. See THE GREAT BREXIT DEBATE.
Inquiring but he’s got us in a position now, that more than half the country wants to be in. In a position that previous goverments just didn’t have the balls to put us into.
Inquiring Rubbish. Hense why there will be no vote. Because it will be lost..... We are more than capable of looking after ourself. You’re just another remainer who believes the scaremongery none sense!
Well done Boris! The court has no place ruling on a political issue, I could not agree more. They have completely overstepped their authority. I hope you get Brexit done soon. The world is getting really tired of this.
Tom you have solved the brexit problem! And should be knighted. No wait... Actually turns out that you can't seem to comprehend the basic concepts of negotiation.
Nathan Ellis - I know enough to understand that a negotiation that yields no deal is synonymous with failure. Kind of like how Boris has performed as PM.
@@tomdestryjr.4261 Boris was elected because he wants to deliver brexit. Everything he does is towards that goal. Between your own job, serving as PM and leader of the opposition, who would you say has the easier job?
Nathan Ellis Moot point. If he negotiates a deal before Oct 31st then by all means Brexit should proceed. Without a deal moving ahead would be a disaster and cause even more political turmoil as well as economic chaos. The Conservative party has had three years to negotiate a deal and has nothing to show for it. He’s promised a deal and needs to deliver. If that means another delay, that’s the price to be paid. A majority of Parliament has demanded it and now the law requires it.
@@tomdestryjr.4261Majority in Parliament has demanded it. Hmm so if a number of people vote on something then the majority should be pursued. Interesting. You can't seriously believe that another extension, legally ruling out no deal then negotiate with nothing, then taking that "deal" to a referendum will solve anything? Riots will burn the house of commons to the ground long before that.
It is sad how parliament is playing into Johnson's hand even after repeated pleas from Bercow about how their outbursts will be perceived by the people watching.
The law the supreme court states Boris broke didn't exist at the time. The supreme court created the precedent there and then, which is extremely disturbing.
RUclips monitors RUclips monitors To be an independent country England has to leave the United Kingdom not the EU. That actually would solve a lot of problems considering that England does not have a border to the Republic of Ireland and Scotland neither wanted to leave the EU nor the United Kingdom. Wales of course might still be a difficulty.
@@Brot1984 we has a nation should go back like we were in the early 70s, we were worse off when we joined, so how could we be worse off leaving give back the uk to its people provide teaching, by our hospitals not in turmoil let our own factories provide for are own people, instead of employing cheap labour & sending our monies over sea's , go back to being England full stop, with no deal or with a deal, it will not hurt the uk.
NO DEAL = Pay £ NIl = £0 EXIT Ransom Fee ----- Why is getting our UK pensions back not good ? Why is No DEAL FOR UK bad because No DEAL = Taxes should come DOWN - MAYBE 0 % VAT - Because No More EU £10 / £12 BILLION per year - to TAX UK workers to fund EU at British people's pockets.
Go Boris! He’s doing such a good job in these miserable and embittered circumstances. This cannot go on. The establishment must accept that Brexit needs to happen if we are ever to heal the gaping wounds in this country. All these parties that want to remain do not seem to grasp the simple reality that Pandora’s box has been opened. They voted for it twice. Allowing a referendum, then article 50. We need to move on. These morons are preventing us from doing so; and they do this at their own peril. Idiots.
Because as soon as you start imprisoning Prime Ministers for making political decisions (his job), you might as well disband the HOC and remove democracy?
@@michaelrollinson7371 If, as was assessed, his motives were irregular to say the least he should not be exempt from scrutiny and barring where necessary.
@@earthman6700 But your position is NOT the claim of the OP, who said he belongs in jail. As per your claim, we appear to be living in a world governed by lawyers and not law. Law draws on prior precedence, to make its decisions. The Supreme Court has not done this, as there is a) no precedence for not allowing parliament to be prorogued, and b) for un-elected lawyers to reverse and strike off a decision made by an elected parliamentarian. Was he doing the proroguing for political gain? I think yes. But did he break any law in doing so? no. Result = It is going to take a long time to put democracy back together again.
Good on Boris, rest assure he will deliver, Its time everybody backed him instead of going against him. The country is in this mess because of labour, when a certain P,M decided to let 3.2 million car washers/fruit pickers in. Roll on 31st October. Labour can suck a big fat Cheesy Cock.
3 years ago we thought game of thrones was the greatest show in the history of mankind and we regret every second of those days.
Luckily enough, Chernobyl rose from the ashes of Kingslanding.
fully agree, incredible show for free
I guess this have to do now...
John Bercow's getting killed off
@@Zenocius ...along with Blondie Bozo and Nihil Fromage.
Nothing beats British Politics and Parliament
I started watching this several weeks ago to get my mind off the shit show that's going on in the U.S and have to admit that Parliament is quite lively. U.S politics is positively boring when compared to this.
That's because you're not accustomed to maddening Italian politics, honey...
A PM that openly does not respect the law. I cannot tell the difference between uk and us
Can you not see that Boris is trying to get Brexit through, which got the most votes in the referendum. It's the Labour party, Lib Dems, etc that are being undemocratic and looking to stop Brexit and democracy by any means possible
@@stopmasshysteria5757 👍🏼
It's *constitutional law not criminal law,* so he can't be fined nor imprisoned.
@@stopmasshysteria5757 I don't know what Boris is trying to do. No one voted for a no deal BREXIT which would damage the UK. Boris should get a new deal, if he can, and present it to Parliament. If he can't do this, or refuses to do this, he should step aside.
@@brachiator1 the remainers don't want any kind of a deal. All they want to do is to dismiss the electorate and cancel Brexit. Personally I think that's what they're after, and I'm not alone in that view. It's very similar to the US Presidential election in 2016 where the Democrats can't and won't accept defeat
Well said Boris
Why are so many MPs emotional snowflakes? All about feeling and emotion. No logic nor rationality nor reasonable cooperation . We voted to leave. STOP frustrating it.
Well, look at the bright side. Our favorite TV show is back. 😂😂😂
I'm sick of it. Where's Cromwell or Guy Fawkes when you need them. This is homegrown meaningless and pointless dangerous politics and nothing more. The UK was operating fine until the Tories cooked up this fiasco.
There are bigger issues that should be addressed by government. As Richard Attenborough makes crystal clear.
Kill all mps
And the next will? Why isn't there any transcript here?
I thought they cancelled the show? Great scriptwriting, but a bit far fetched, as if, a leader is found unlawful and gets to keep his post, really?
@@watercolourmark Unlawful =/= illegal.
Will he now appeal to the European Court of Justice?
This joke is getting old. He can't.
The Supreme Court of Law IS the European court of justice. so it's not a surprising result.
Well, he'll have to. Stands to reason. As he was only flogging the Leave thing as a little career move to begin with ... He's a blow with the wind type of guy who doesn't believe in anything and now he's got to get on with Brexit Shit!
@@NatashahoneypotThe constitutions of the individual member states are a national matter. ECJ has only jurisdiction on EU-wide matters.
🤣🤣
Back Boris!!
Hear, hear Boris!!
The latest episode of Monty Python.
I do say this episode's lead character is even better than Biggus Dickus!
OOOOOODDDDDOOOOORRRRR!
They weren't this sick (and not, not the good kind of 'sick').
Welease wodereick
Dubbin Nutt fckn nailed it 🤣🤣
He fought the law and law...was strongly disagreed with?
Is that the cover version by tribute band The Kerfuffle?
@@englandcalling9721 With backup by the Covfefe's.
@@wmst5065 Don't forget the Wetherspoons Gammon Male Voice Choir!
@@Fireglo Yes you can. Someone commits an action, society considers the act so heinous, that it then gets codified into law as a *named crime* so that the person can be punished. People were being killed by other people long before the crime of murder existed, then society realised people killing other people without consequence was a bad thing so it was made into a named crime in order to punish the offenders. Very rarely does a society predefine a crime before that act has ever been commited.
@@mikeward1701 thumbs up and sadly true in our law
Lock him up!
The Queen has a headache
Need paracetamol tablets extra strong
The Queen is 93. Even if she still is able to keep what's going on she can just not care.
Gaslighting 101!
IT WAS NOT A DEMOCRATIC RESULT !!!! IT WAS A SCAM !! THEY LIED !!! THEY KNOW IT. STOP LETTING THEM PRETEND OTHERWISE.
How was it not democratic? What lies?
@@craigyb16 350 million pounds a week to the NHS
Anyone who voted did so based on their opinion. If they were stupid enough to believe one set of lies then they would also be stupid enough to believe another equal set of lies. The fact remains that the majority of people voted to leave.
@@mrgame-man5792 Leaving the EU isn't opinion based. It's factual.
@@mrgame-man5792 yh I understand and agree with what your saying and I agree that too many people voted on an "opinion" which was slowly hypnotised into them over the year running up to the result.
The people don't want a second referendum? How does he know that? Think we should hold a referendum to ask the people whether they want it or not.
Forn you’re an idiot
WE HAD A REFERENDUM...LEAVE WON ..Remainers need to accept it and LEAVE .
Yes let's do that, and if I lose then I want another referendum 😉
It hurts when you don't get your own way doesn't it.
If you can't accept you lost a vote you need to grow up 🤷♂️.
5:29 Johnson: 'I think the court was wrong to pronounce on what is essentially a political question at a time of great national controversy.' Well, 11 out of 11 supreme court judges disagree with you and they are far more qualified and believable to know what they are doing than you are. Besides, it is very poor statesmanship to be seen openly criticising and disagreeing with the highest court in the land when they have already passed judgement even if that judgement happens to be at odds with your personal and political beliefs. A good statesman would want his citizens to accept court rulings, especially those cases the citizen lost and generally respect the judges. One has to lead by example.
Yet the High Court took the opposite view and in this verdict there were curious undertones which suggested the 11 were well aware they were on dangerous ground - another reason why they had to make it unanimous. I believe more in Reece-Mogg who has an encyclopaedic knowledge of our Constitution but I watch even more for Dr Davi Starkey's comments when they come, I think on RUclips where he has a number of fantastic posts . Bercow an ape, Dominic Grieve a s... and even has a go at the Royals. Will be very much on the look-out for that.
11 remainers that is......
@@jamesdouglaswhittaker6645 It was proper for the Supreme Court to hear the matter. The Scottish Court of Session ruled one way, the High Court ruled another. I would take the knowledge and expertise of the 11 Justices of the Supreme Court over that of the High Court as they are generally some of the most knowledgeable of the UK Constitution.
The Rt. Hon. Rees-Mogg is not a lawyer. Even though he is a very eloquent speaker and well educated, he has not gone through legal education. This is poignant, as the UK Constitution is uncodified (as in, it is spread over many documents instead of a single document, i.e. The US Constitution). There are several documents that provide the basis for the UK's Constitution, including the Magna Carta (1215) and the Bill of Rights (1689) straight through to the EU Withdrawal Act (2020).
@@paulholmes8211 Their positions on the subject of Brexit are relatively unknown. As true Justices, they made their ruling on the facts from the lower courts, the evidence of those lower courts, and the testimony and arguments before them.
I believe that Parliament is supposed to represent the public, they seem to think that they have the right to ignore the rights unless they actually agree with the decision that they make. This situation is very dangerous, have the public got any rights or not?
I would say that only Johnson would read an 11-0 Supreme Court decision &say "WRONG", but he has an orange twin across the water.
Grovelling to a panel of judges (how did they get to be appointed??) So the Chartrists were wrong sufragettes were wrong anyone opposing the Nuremburg laws were wrong for braking the law of the land? The law is ALWAYS by deifntion "right" is that it?
@@MrYorickJenkins Absolutely none of what you just said makes any sense. The USA has jusicial review, and has made the same social and legal advances.
@@MrYorickJenkins
He was found to have broken the law in two courts ( the Court of Session the highest civil court in Scotland and the Supreme Court the highest court in the UK)
Three judges in the Court of Session and eleven judges of the Supreme Court unanimously found Boris Johnson to have mislead the Queen and broken the law. Boris Johnson thinks he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges of the UK. He is mad.
Boris probably thought it was all done and
dusted.Insisting his move was legal against the opinion of a panel of judges reminds me of what's happening with his bouffant headed counterpart on the other side of the ocean. Give him an inch and he'll take a mile. And then what?
You can't get much done in a climate of discord. Quite frankly I don't think Boris is the right man for the task in front of him.
A lot can happen in a week.
Those so called top judges are all remainers ...so corrupt
This unqualified clown thinks he knows the law better than 11 supreme court judges.
This poltiical court set up in 2009 on the American model should be dismantled. Does anyone know hwho is even eligible to join the little panel of judges? Who appointed them? As it is a poltical tool, why should he not disagree with its decisions?
Well! They have properly screwed up now haven’t they. Their decision will cause problems with the Constitution for years.
Yorick Jenkins Carry on disputing this Boris. Nadira Singh (aka Millar) is backed by money from business who wish to remain anonymous but we all know who they are don’t we!
@@jeansouthworth5880 I dont to be honest
He was found to have broken the law by the 3 judges of the Court of Session and the 11 judges of the supreme court. Boris Johnson after being found to have broken the law says that he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges in the UK. He is mad.
MUCH LOVE&BLESSINGS to ALL.WE ALL NEED TO GIVE,RECEIVE& FEEL MORE...LOVE.LOVE
Well it's a lovely thought. Thanks. 😊
He’s provoked sharp anger here in Ireland by constantly referring to ‘the surrender act’, and similar hostile language. Britain’s fellow EU members are not a hostile force - an enemy - to be resisted and fought against, including us, the country with the most complex, and frequently violent history and ties with Britain. To use such language engenders a hostility towards the Eu, and her citizens, that feeds straight into toxic far-right extremism in Britain and elsewhere, and could spur on violent extremists or lunatics into attacks on ‘the other’, which would also include British politicians (not necessarily those opposing Brexit). One might expect a similar amount of silent anger across other Eu states over such intemperate language, while we, of course, continue to note the utter lack of a solution to the Northern Ireland Border Issue, despite the dishonest claims of ‘progress’ being made - our own Tanaiste (Deputy PM) this week called the proposed plans and solutions “fanciful”. Once again, it seems, the British public are not being given an honest account of the true failure to meet Brexit realities.
It is indeed a surrender act - I see no animosity to the eu nations, only the eu. Do you not see the discontent in those eu nations toward the eu organisation? It is corrupt in that it's books have not been signed off for years and, with the new leadership being such a corrupt and incompetent lot, I expect nothing to change until it collapses altogether. There is no chance of a deal while the UK in within the eu. Common (business) sense can only prevail when money is at stake as the UK is the largest customer of the eu and their businesses will be able to drive deals properly.
You have something very wrong here. The recent actions and language from the EU is hostile and under no considerations whatsoever can the recent attitudes of Verhofstadt - coupled with his strident language in a speech (the like of which I hoped never to hear again) announcing this vision of an 'Empire" of their dreams. At last the reality is being revealed - but only so perilously close to the full implementation of the Lisbon Treaty in 2020. So close and so permanently binding all participants to the yoke of this undemocratic, protectionist Union administered and directed from one Central Control over-riding individual Governments.
Until the full extent of this "dream" - or nightmare as sometimes perceived - is fully studied and completely understood ( and few have done so) the end effect of it's impact on the lives of ordinary people cannot be appreciated. The highly emotional chatter over Brexit is drowning out the reality of the end game, the end impact on our lives. The slowly constricting controls will prove tighter on our children and even more binding on our children's children.
I ask you Ver Coda to consider this: - The highly commendable original EEC plan was for an group of Countries to join into into a barrier free, tariff free , mutually profitable,purely trading Association. The expectation was that this would also promote friendships and peace throughout war torn Europe..Brilliant. So how is it that this peace promoting ideal has, in less than half a lifetime, morphed into a burgeoning 'Empire' now hell bent on building an Army prepared for war ? Why are it's member States split between well off and broken Countries (under a flawed Euro and imposed controls, both political and economic)-now pressing for a return to Nationalism and their original currency.. This has not happened by accident. Rules and currencies can be amended to suit circumstances and help friends in need -if the will is there. So the will is not there. . Is that sensible let alone friendship? Or......
Ireland may well have special concerns. Among friends and those of good intent they are not insurmountable. Given time. Among friends reach special understandings.. Any return to violence would be deplorable but in truth it will not happen unless men of violence. wish it. There is no need for that, particularly if the future is assured through right decisions based on thorough understandings of all circumstance.
.
We leave with no deal simple fuck the EU
@@jamesdouglaswhittaker6645 Hear Hear
It is not a question of the EU being an enemy. It is simply that most people in the UK do not wish to be part of the ever closer political union to which the current EU leadership is clearly committed. Having said that, the EU's strategy in the Brexit negotiations has done nothing to allay perceptions that it is determined to make the UK pay a heavy price for leaving and this has fomented much of the hostility to which you refer. As an EU without the UK will become an organisation in which three countries will have to subsidise the other 24 for the forseeable future, it would be much more sensible for the EU leaders to agree to a separation that minimises any adverse economic consequences for both sides.
Common sense will prevail .. thanks boris
Thank you, we need to move on.
I cant wait for Scottish independence
Is this clown show not enough for you?
What and join the eu. Very independent haha
Should have happeend before yes. The English majority for leave was overwhelming.
And northen Ireland too
@@gellideggti Fuck Joining the EU. We go independent and sell our water. The way global warming is going Scotlands water will be worth more than the worlds oil, Clowns at Westminster or Europe start their shite then they can die of thirst
Good luck Boris. You've got one hell of a difficult job and the media and opposition certainly aren't helping.
Go on boris
The boy who wanted to be trump🤪
Oh Please! Don’t demean yourself by spouting comments like this. Please do some proper research.
Dreaming to be PM or President of a country and reaching that goal...hmmmm.
It is hard to stoop so low but by god he is trying.
What a mess!
@@jeansouthworth5880 jokes dont need research
So basically all BoJo had to say was Brexit, Brexit, and more Brexit. Like a mantra to ward off all evil...
i'd love to see what his plan is once the island starts to sink in utter chaos ;)
Brexitjuice Brexitjuice Brexitjuice
Yeah because brexit won and you idiots cant take it .... the remainers are destroying democracy..
@@Mariaf12 Democracy is a 2% majority on a non-binding referendum three years ago in which almost none of the voters could have had any idea what the actual results of a yes vote would mean?
@@kirkkerman I voted leave , and i want to leave without a deal..most brexiteers want to leave without a deal, the remainers would rather stay in a corrupt establishment paying over billion pounds a month. the majority rules, but your all sore losers
Do it Boris!
Boris’ boss has been noticeably quiet. The Queen’s speech is going to be very interesting 😲
A cornered, injured animal is very dangerous thing.
lol... the snake has no teeth
Two wrongs don't make a right. But three lefts do.
John Borges Especially when surrounded by a bunch of Baying hyenas.
He's got his back against the wall and is now desperately pandering to the far right. I was in the states during the lead up and election of Trump and the similarities are uncanny.
@Thanos Mighty I'm interested to see what would happen I suppose. Why tf would I be afraid of one?
Lies
Come on boris🦍Lets get a deal your the man
He is boss, finally someone with some balls
Boris Johnson build a bridge to ireland please
People voted to leave, not leave in chaos they also did to vote to have a prat like Boris in.
Peter Atkin People voted on the statement ‘remain in the EU’ or ‘Leave the EU, with or without a deal’ - I emphasise ‘or without’
You just wrong. I voted to leave now and ill vote boris tomorrow.
No deal is the Tory plan.
They keep their Coffers and businesses that trade with Europe pay the price, and so will we as the cost of living rises.
Why is he a prat. He is clumsy and not the world's best speaker but at least he is trying to bring this overlong saga to an end and fulfil the undertakings which parliament has made
@@MrYorickJenkins Alas poor Yorick, you're correct.
He's not a prat, he's a F#cking moron.
We even doing Brexit anymore, or we get tired of that and just argue with scotland, parliament and supreme court and maybe queen instead
Forget the Queen.
She knows about the situation.
If someone ever wants to understand the word *DELUDED* watch this.
Hes bang on with everything he said.
Paul Gibbons It’s the way he’s twisting it to his own ends though.
@@nicholasdickens2801 what is his own ends? Hes in the top job in the land. Theres no career move from here. He just recognises the blindingly obvious. We need to get on with Brexit. Its been 3.5 years. He wants to get back to his normal job of governing the UK.
Delusion is thinking that a duly voted on referendum ignored by a bunch of remoaner snowflakes is the right thing to do. Pfffth!
I support Boris 100% no deal now
Go on Boris, you legend!
@Boris Farage No mate. Not that symbol.
U broke the law borris. u should go 2 jail
@@gerry77mckee18,,, what law??
Good on you Boris..!!!!
Start of the next episode of Brexit. I hope this is the final season.
I'm interested to see what historians will make of the Brexit saga when it's finally over. How will it be described in school history books?🤔
Manus Macgearailt same as a previous history student and now a law student, I am excited over the debates and mooting over this matter
Sherjung Kandangwa you me and both, cause it is starting to get old, real fast.
Manus Macgearailt: Here let me have a go.... “In the mid 2010s David Cameron the Conservative PM under pressure of losing voters to the growing UKIP party called a “binding” IN / OUT public referendum on membership of the EU. The country narrowly voted to leave and this began more than a decade of political division eventually causing the break up of the United Kingdom, destroyed the Conservative and Labour parties leaving a political vacuum that paved the way for the rise of the populist parties.” - Pessimistic Nostradamus 27th September 2039
Well Boris, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. Her Majesty has yet to put forward her thoughts on the matter.
The wind seems to be knocked out of Jacob Rees Mogg...has the The Queen perogued his beheading ?
Is that all you got "coward "
Hope not
Leave Moggy alone. He’s wonderful.
A Its true now the supreme court as stepped in where going to go the american route now with laws every time opposition is not happy lets take it to court ,now the eu have said since may signed the treaty they will not open it they want to keep us in with the back stop we voted leave but mp's are putting the careers before the country ,places that voted leave have remain mps and vice versus as a labour voter its now gone I've never voted torie in twenty years but i will this time corybyn as killed the labour party i once loved,call,a vote of no confidence
*THE BOY WHO WANTED TO BECOME WORLD KING...* 😂
Jean Claude Juncker 💣💥
Alexander the great B. de Pfeffel Johnson
Hitler?
the other parties, the smaller parties? That’s just shows his disrespect for Parliament. He’ll be laughing on the other side of one of his two faces when they support a vote of no confidence in him and his rotting government. Oh, and another thing. The Supreme Court decision has absolutely nothing to do with Brexit. As everybody in country knows, except him, it was to do with his own deceit and his breaking the law by lying to the Queen and Parliament. So there.
He didn't break the law as no law a exsisted to break. They just created legal precedent.
boris...problem is the people do not feel the same about Brexit as they did 3 years ago! they've seen some of the shady deals proposed, the predictions and the shear reality of the unknown has categorically sunk any hope whatsoever of a positive outcome. that's what's going on today! (boris...you keep referring to the state of the country 3 years ago when the vote was taken) boris...it's like the honeymoon is over, reality has set in and the people deserve another go at whether they indeed want to exit the EU.
@@sophiadaly4712 because I voted remain and I want leave maybe😀
@@sophiadaly4712 Because people change their minds. Especially when they start living the reality of what it means and what the potential consequences will mean to the country. You are or should be allowed to change you mind. It's a human trait.
@@checkeredflagfilms TBH I think there are much more people now that will vote leave rather than remain, so its just another time waster. Get with the program man. 31/10/19 come what may(with a deal)
Who the hell does he this. He’s a liar and charlatan. Everything he does is designed for his own political gain.
What can he gain now? He is in the top job. What matters now is Brexit and hes getting on with it.
The best PM since Thatcher that's who...
He's like Petrov from House of Cards, the worse his situation, the more bravado he shows to make everyone think he's in control
Come away from T.V. get reality into your intellectual focus, do you wish to be ruled by the E.U.?
@Elizabeth Vincent - I don't remember feeling we were being ruled by the EU for the last 40 years. Are you saying that we have had no control over our fate since we joined the EU? I seem to recall a lot of times when the United Kingdom reacted powerfully and with great force over the past decades - for better or worse.
That's basically what she's saying Jonny, congratulations.
@RoadKillzine I'm open minded. If you're right then what's going on in parliament is taking away all of Johnson's ammunition. The 'We will leave with or without a deal at the end of October' argument does have gumption. So, if you're right, all this fuss - which he tried to avoid by closing parliament - is disempowering him.
I'm taking on board what you've said, and I appreciate the response, but know I'm very confused as to where I stand on this!
Oh dear
All this bluster will not stop the legacy of this party and our PM from being defined by their actions. The ones with honour were removed or removed themselves. When history is written the executive, leader and the compliant will be noted as nothing but a stain on this country - an embarrassment we wish we could forget.
History isn’t a singular narrative - it’s a variety of interpretations. Parliament delaying, time wasting, both parties just being obsolete? All those reasons and numerous others will be considered. Personally - I wager they’ll be pretty scathing to everyone and everything involved.
Sir Humphrey Appleby - I agree, with little but a flimsy ideology to hide behind, that is slowly disintegrating, I don’t give them much hope. It is hardly our proudest moment, and I wouldn’t like the job of painting over those cracks.
@@watercolourmark - I wouldn't wish for a facade to be put up, I only wish people would stop using this right side of history nonsense - none of us possess an faultless crystal ball.
Sir Humphrey Appleby - but it is metaphor. The right side of history means the right side of right, what people mean when they say history will paint them as a stain is, I don’t want to live in a future that doesn’t frown upon such wrongdoings. Sure, history could paint Boris Johnson as a genius hero, but you wouldn’t take that to Ladbrokes, would you? It is usually the liberal and good that go down well, does history have a favourite right-wing cock? Statistically, I doubt he will be the first.
@@watercolourmark - I think there are plenty of people on the right wing who are well respected and get a favourable hearing in the history books, it all depends on your own perception of what is right and wrong. Again some people for example think Bismarck was wonderful ; others hate his guts. The same could be said of any important leader. Is Al Johnson my favourite person - no. Do I think he has a less than ideal hand in trying to get a parliament overwhelmingly in favour of remain to deliver our exit - certainly. We are going to have to accept that if parliament continues to subvert a democratic excercise, the executive will need to get more and more underhanded in response.
🏴Come on boris Lets get a deal🙏
Where is his marvelous new deal?
They want to talk about that.
The Traitorous Remainer Parliamentarians have smashed that. No- one could get a deal while these dirty tricks are being played against the Prime Minister. Don’t blame Boris. He should be proud of his determination to honour the people’s vote. Let’s hope he does it!
@Jean Southworth - nothing is stopping him from coming up with a deal. Where is the deal with the EU?
Boris Johnson has no deal, and has less of month to get one. It took three years to get BREXIT deal UK got, which so far has been rejected by Parliment.
Just like the BBC blame Boris for the tone of Parliament when he was only replying to a barrage of abuse, Boris is saying what the people think, the reason MP's are being threatened is because they are frustrating the will of the people and the public are furious, we voted for no deal and they are trying to get that option removed then they will never vote for any deal, so it will become a stalemate, who's devious now?
So they are free to call Boris anything they want and all thats reported is that Boris used the word 'Surrender' and thats hate speech, Naga Manchette has been reprimanded for her comments towards Trump and he is also being misquoted, he said 'if the 4 think America is so terrible the why don't they go back to the countries they came from and see how they like it there' but the BBC reports that he told them to 'go back to their own countries' Naga.
If it's so vital the referendum be respected, why was it an advisory, non binding referendum? It's almost like the governement wanted to give themselves a get out clause, if the british public make a decision thats not in their best interest.
The court found unanimously. Your opinion is not important Bojo.
The court is formed by Tony Blair. They are remainers.
@@prodigiii712 sooooo Tony Blair thought, nearly a decade ago: "Maybe at some point in the future, there might be a referendum on the EU, and then some contrived issue related to that will come before this new court.. Better ask every candidate their opinion on the EU and appoint a whole court on this one hypothetical future case... just in case? "
@@prodigiii712 And that besides the fact that ten of the judges were invested under a conservative prime minister and six of those under Theresa May alone?
This fool is so ill prepared to lead it’s insane 😂
Can’t even deliver a decent Brexit and promises a bright and successful future for the country. Time will tell Mr Johnson. Time will tell.
The thing is he is a much better option than Corbyn.
Imagine if corbyn got in.. The economy would crash so badly haha
Katia Ferreira And whose fault is that? I am so disgusted in the remainer parliamentarians. They are nothing but traitors wanting to give our country away to a Federal Union. The EU have already started getting ready to take our army over. They have conscription. I sincerely hope that you do not have any young men in your family. Our Great Britain lost enough young men in the last war. Our soldiers have already been sent to the Ukraine.
We must leave. We joined a Common Market. We did not join to give our country away to this Federal Union. I just don’t understand you people.
Boris Johnson is the real man. future of UK is in good hands
Bojo thinks himself a lawyer.
Not to insult your intelligence but he is literally the Prime Minister ... your average lawyer would find it difficult to become even a government minister. He is also certainly more educated and experienced in UK and EU law than your average lawyer.
...from someone training to become 'your average lawyer'.
Shocker! Guilty man disagrees with verdict, after submitting no witness testimonials. Because that is what innocence people do?
Please Enlighten me how I can be wrong.
1. There was precedent made before where Parliament did indeed use Proroguing for frustrating parliament. This was presented by the lawyer defending the government. Where was the consideration for that precedent in this judgement? Why was it dulled void and not relevant to said judgement?
2. The judges decided they have the power to subjectively decide if the length and reasons for the Proroguing are lawful. Isn't this dangerous territory for our courts to be in? Everything political should be of the decisions and influence of government only.
3. Now that judges have decided you can't frustrate parliament by using proroguing by cherry picking certain precedents and disregarding others. Can we hold accountable previous PM's that have ''abused'' its power such as John Major. John Major was a supporter for this case, which is ironic.
Alexander Coles Blair still needs locking up for Iraq
*roll eyes* Boris, it's not your place to question the supreme court.
@Ari Onassis-Sugen no, but has to be done on the right grounds.
@Ari Onassis-Sugen
Boris Johnson was found to have mislead the Queen and broke the law by 3 judges of the court of session. He was then found to have broken the law by 11 judges of the Supreme Court. Fourteen of the top judges in the UK unanimously found that Boris Johnson broke the law by closing down parliament. But Boris Johnson says that they were wrong, why would anyone believe a word he says.
I love the fact he tells parliament, supreme court was wrong about giving them a job again lol
@@ilamfull oh stop being bloody pedantic
Parliaments job is to be representatives of the constituencies that voted for them.
270 constituencies voted Leave in the 2016 referendum. Were are the 270 brexiteer MP’s ?
This has gone on for tooo long, just get it done or forget about it. We need to move on
@Yattaman The quickest path to stability is revoking Article 50 otherwise you are absolutely correct. It's just the start of a long meaningless and pointless path to correct the problems this has created.
There will and should probably be a second referendum.
I don't think a second referendum is a good idea, we can't play best out of three
@@ftty4334
Just that the next referendum would go overwhelmingly in favor of remain
Cameron hit the nuclear Brexit button because the Tories were haemorrhaging votes to UKIP and has set the country down this path of division. All it’s done is unbottle the nationalistic genie which now can’t ever be put back. I agree that this will rumble on for years and could well cause the break up of the union... but I don’t suppose that bothers some people as long as it fulfils the “will of the people”.
Is he raving mad?
Im baffled by his declarations. How low can he sincerely fall before he is voted out.
His programme for post brexit is a bloody joke that benefits only the investors.
He and his party has bloody already dissappointed his supposed people, he has repeteadly hasnt cared for his people.
And never will since the brexiteers aint his people the bankers the elite as he has proven all time along.
No he's tory
"No disrespect but 11 - 0 verdict was wrong". A) what IS your definition of disrespect, B) law is not a matter of subjective opinion.
Law is of course subjective, that is why lawyers exist.
Boris Johnson was found to have broken the law by the 3 judges of the court of session and the 11 judges of the supreme court.
Boris Johnson thinks he knows the law better than 14 of the top judges of the UK. He is a nutter.
It’s a shame !
Now, I believe he knows what he is doing.
Good job Boris!
Johnson... Just resign. For the sake of British pride and dignity.
Fuck off you bloody hypocrite
@Ann-Marie Paliukenas Dignity? Coming from the people who wants to undermine democracy by cancelling the referendum. Shameless remoaner
@@saharasun3862 lmao fuck the people. Bring on socialism 🙌
Don’t resign Boris. We need to get out and fast before they steal our army and take our young people to war whether they want to go or not. Conscription is coming. This is NOT SCAREMONGERING. See THE GREAT BREXIT DEBATE.
Boris! Stick with it and ignore these ignorant people.
Boris Johnson: Best thing for our country in a LONG LONG TIME!
Inquiring but he’s got us in a position now, that more than half the country wants to be in. In a position that previous goverments just didn’t have the balls to put us into.
Inquiring Rubbish. Hense why there will be no vote. Because it will be lost.....
We are more than capable of looking after ourself. You’re just another remainer who believes the scaremongery none sense!
Inquiring prove me wrong.
The highest level of society, but they sounds like indiscipline school students !
Lowest level of society.
Well done Boris! The court has no place ruling on a political issue, I could not agree more. They have completely overstepped their authority. I hope you get Brexit done soon. The world is getting really tired of this.
It's simple Boris; no deal = no exit. Put your money where your mouth is and get a deal negotiated, or postpone the exit until you do.
Tom you have solved the brexit problem! And should be knighted.
No wait... Actually turns out that you can't seem to comprehend the basic concepts of negotiation.
Nathan Ellis - I know enough to understand that a negotiation that yields no deal is synonymous with failure. Kind of like how Boris has performed as PM.
@@tomdestryjr.4261 Boris was elected because he wants to deliver brexit. Everything he does is towards that goal. Between your own job, serving as PM and leader of the opposition, who would you say has the easier job?
Nathan Ellis Moot point. If he negotiates a deal before Oct 31st then by all means Brexit should proceed. Without a deal moving ahead would be a disaster and cause even more political turmoil as well as economic chaos. The Conservative party has had three years to negotiate a deal and has nothing to show for it. He’s promised a deal and needs to deliver. If that means another delay, that’s the price to be paid. A majority of Parliament has demanded it and now the law requires it.
@@tomdestryjr.4261Majority in Parliament has demanded it. Hmm so if a number of people vote on something then the majority should be pursued. Interesting.
You can't seriously believe that another extension, legally ruling out no deal then negotiate with nothing, then taking that "deal" to a referendum will solve anything? Riots will burn the house of commons to the ground long before that.
It is sad how parliament is playing into Johnson's hand even after repeated pleas from Bercow about how their outbursts will be perceived by the people watching.
Thank you my teamwork take me to World media. A trust court better than, tory and Borissssss.
It is Iran Boris not tyran. They are not the tyrants.
So much rambling
Absolutely love Boris! ❤
Oliver New wtf he’s a reptile haha
@@treetops6438 simply referring to people you don't agree with as some sort of animal doesn't give you or your cause any credence atall...
The law the supreme court states Boris broke didn't exist at the time. The supreme court created the precedent there and then, which is extremely disturbing.
Just leave the EU on 31oct so England can go back being an independent country. With a deal or no deal.
RUclips monitors RUclips monitors
To be an independent country England has to leave the United Kingdom not the EU. That actually would solve a lot of problems considering that England does not have a border to the Republic of Ireland and Scotland neither wanted to leave the EU nor the United Kingdom. Wales of course might still be a difficulty.
@@Brot1984 we has a nation should go back like we were in the early 70s, we were worse off when we joined, so how could we be worse off leaving give back the uk to its people provide teaching, by our hospitals not in turmoil let our own factories provide for are own people, instead of employing cheap labour & sending our monies over sea's , go back to being England full stop, with no deal or with a deal, it will not hurt the uk.
J.R.Moggy seems to be having time out again !!!
Disgraceful, shameless clown of a human being he is.
Boris can't possibly lose this battle....he has Yoda sitting behind him!
He's Luke Skywalker but half the midichlorian count and chromosomes
Oh but we do want another referendum.
Northern Ireland at this point must be completely done with the British. Protestant or not.
Unified Ireland in my time, woah. Thanks Brexit.
Despot
Convicted criminals always say the same.
NO DEAL = Pay £ NIl = £0 EXIT Ransom Fee ----- Why is getting our UK pensions back not good ?
Why is No DEAL FOR UK bad because No DEAL = Taxes should come DOWN - MAYBE 0 % VAT - Because No More EU £10 / £12 BILLION per year - to TAX UK workers to fund EU at British people's pockets.
Boris Johnson's my nan.
_Not a good start, Boris!_
Boris is a demagogue!
Go Boris! He’s doing such a good job in these miserable and embittered circumstances. This cannot go on. The establishment must accept that Brexit needs to happen if we are ever to heal the gaping wounds in this country. All these parties that want to remain do not seem to grasp the simple reality that Pandora’s box has been opened. They voted for it twice. Allowing a referendum, then article 50. We need to move on. These morons are preventing us from doing so; and they do this at their own peril. Idiots.
Why isn't he in jail yet?
He hasn't done anything unlawful that's why.
Why isn't Tony blair
Because as soon as you start imprisoning Prime Ministers for making political decisions (his job), you might as well disband the HOC and remove democracy?
@@michaelrollinson7371 If, as was assessed, his motives were irregular to say the least he should not be exempt from scrutiny and barring where necessary.
@@earthman6700 But your position is NOT the claim of the OP, who said he belongs in jail. As per your claim, we appear to be living in a world governed by lawyers and not law. Law draws on prior precedence, to make its decisions. The Supreme Court has not done this, as there is a) no precedence for not allowing parliament to be prorogued, and b) for un-elected lawyers to reverse and strike off a decision made by an elected parliamentarian. Was he doing the proroguing for political gain? I think yes. But did he break any law in doing so? no. Result = It is going to take a long time to put democracy back together again.
Order!! Order! Order!!!
well BOJO is a train seasoned constitutional lawyer so of course he know more than the supreme judges
Their political hacks with a politically biased decision.
BOZO knowing more than 11 Justices is the latest Brexshit joke in the book. Next, please.
Good for you PM let them have it.
More popcorn needed 🍿
Good on Boris, rest assure he will deliver, Its time everybody backed him instead of going against him. The country is in this mess because of labour, when a certain P,M decided to let 3.2 million car washers/fruit pickers in. Roll on 31st October. Labour can suck a big fat Cheesy Cock.
I have FAITH in UK Society!!
What a demagogue. How is it OK to bend the truth like this and keep face in public.