Everything Wrong With Django Unchained In 4 Minutes Or Less
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025
- You asked for it, so we watched it many times. Now we're desensitized to violence and the n-word.
Here are all the sins we found in Tarantino's latest, Django Unchained.
Coming Friday: The return of Conversations With Myself About Movies
Next Tuesday: Another sins video you've been begging us to do.
Coming this month: There's magic in the air.
No movie is without sin! Which movie's sins should we recount next? Merch: teespring.com/...
4 minute video explaining everything wrong with a movie that's almost 3 hours long. confirmed cinema sins loves this movie
By that time CinemaSins only made 5 minutes long videos.
Only people who don't love this movie are racists who can't stand the thought of a black guy being the hero and riding off into the sunset in the end.
+blacc beard I LOVE this movie but I think people won't like it because of the Violence or the Gore (like mums)
+Emmet Connolly I agree
+blacc beard even racists would enjoy it by the amount of racism is in this movie + slavery + the amount of times the N-word is used.
"Schultz's glass is a third empty here but then magically gets more full"
Perks of being German
perks of being your own bartender ;-)
But Waltz is Austrian
Idiots At Work..
Movie u ntamed
The movie untamed
Idiots At Work i dont get it?
Can we just take a second to appreciate that nearly a hour occurs in the film between sins 19 and 20
Eh it was good movie 😂
Because its an old video. I love v this movie but if je made this video today it would be at least 15 minutes 😆
@Jacques Malan 😆 just because so many people say that it's exactly why it would. Also
Disregard that also
Because Cinemasins is just reaching
The fact that they didn't take a sin off for the mask scene, one of the funniest scenes in film history, disappoints me.
This video was made before they started removing sins in 2014
@@samueltukua3061 shame
What mask scene
@@marcaldovino264 There's a scene where the sudo kkk is meeting, and they can't talk about anything except how they can't see out of their masks. Just look up "Django unchained mask scene" its absolutely hysterical.
@@max5845 Oh yeah, that was fuckin hilarious
I like how that last lady that gets shot just lifts off the ground and flies away
Second best part in the movie
Shot from the side and down and flies straight back and up? 😆
Симеон Валентинов what’s the first
3:40
Crazy Joe Davola iTs A mOvIE
Wait a minute I just realized that Samuel Jackson killed a bounty hunter named Jango in Star Wars and he was killed by a bounty hunter named Django in this movie.
+Joshua Roy Never even thought of that that is so cool
+Joshua Roy Mind...boom...
The power of the D...
The D is silent hillbilly. Alsoholyshit,myworldgotturnedupsidedown.
Holy shit.
The idea of Django and the doctor building a snowman in the middle of nowhere to shoot up just warms my heart.
DJANGO!! Wanna build a snowman?
queeneve He's a dentist
Zac Isemonger dentists are doctors
queeneve
Yeah, it's still one of my favourite parts in the movie :3
Setanta Life Sure. Of course they are.
Let's be honest, when CinemaSins makes a short everything-wrong-with video for a long movie. It means they actually like it
@abdelmounim baouia am I wrong tho?
@@pheniellanz5271 well yea, because as the guy said its not related to their opinion of the movie how long the video is.
Their pulp fiction and se7en reviews are over 17 mins
And Transformers is 7 minutes..
It’s because it’s a super old episode. All their older videos are short as hell.
Negative 10 sins for Leonardo DiCaprio's terrifyingly amazing improv
ANDY J. RODRIGUEZ did he make it up on the spot?
@@MrCooldude4172 He cut his hand bad and stayed in character the whole time.
his hand is also actually bleeding when he crushes that glass. real blood
That must've hurt. Why the fuck didn't he get an oscar for That?!
So that was HIS REAL BLOOD he smeared on Kerry Washington's face. Shiiiid she kept in character too. 💯 💪🏽 ♥️
i like the way you *sin* boy
😂😂😂😂
MrPurplephrog 😄😄😄
MrPurplephrog I like the way you comment boy.
I Love this Comment
Shultz: “I’ll take you there when the snow melts”
Cinemasins: “why don’t you just take him there right now”
Me: CAUSE OF THE F*ING SNOW!
Exactly, cinemasins should try and hike through some snow some time. Dude just said why not. Not like there's plow trucks
😂😂😂
Also they had to get enough money to buy Broomhilda
@@bulldawgirwin8384 some people forget that paved roads that get plowed when it snows are a pretty recent thing in the grand scheme of things, back in those days just traveling to the next town over in the winter was risking death, let alone across the a state or two
Yeah it wasn't always easy to travel in the winter
3:42 Are you serious? You’re not wondering the least bit how the bullet blasts her away in this ridiculous angle?
Thank you! lol
It’s an homage to old spaghetti western movies, you can ask if you’re curious
You took that seriously? Tf
Eoin Mac Donnchadha Well first of all that’s not a ”serious channel“, is it? And it would have been worth a sin.
signorpippistrello not at all worth a sin. It’s a stylistic choice. In old westerns violence in women was seen as deplorable so they made all their deaths comical. If anything that’s a sin removed for style
I can't believe you (or anybody else) missed the insane physics of Miss Laura's body flying sideways away from Django's shot.
Ah funniest part in the whole film 😂
It was on purpose.
And for her to even fly back so far from it. Every action has a reaction, meaning that if the bullet were that powerful, Django would go flying back at the same force just from firing it.
+Tom tonka well if thats true, then how come people can fire .50 cal rifles without being torn into two, which it can clearly do to an human?
physics aren't that simple people
marnixlol
Well the answer to that is quite simple. It's because they are not the one being hit and torn in 2 by the bullet.
Nothing about Miss Lara being blown sideways? That made me laugh when I saw it in the theater.
I was wondering how that went unnoticed in both the stunt photography AND editing.
knowing Tarantino and his penchant for over the top deaths, he must've put that shot on purpose
That was in the style of the rest of the movie, cartoonizing violence in scenes where it isn't necessary to depict it realistically. I'm almost certain it was intentional
+Kyl Harrt almost?
Because Tarantino is a weird bastard that had loud fuck of noises in Kill Bill for the sheer fuck of it. Don't get me wrong I like the movie, hell I like basicly all the things he made, even from dusk till dawn was really good before the vampires got involved, then the movie turned into something that can only be properly described with the noise "eyyyyyiiiinnnnnggggg?" it feels like it was taken over by an entirely different person after they got to the brothel, which considering it was made by him and Robert Rodriguez is very well possible.
Slave masters used ledgers, that's how he found Django. It's outstandingly self explainatory.
It seems like if he cant get enough sins he just starts pulling them out of his ass
He just said it as a joke he is not a movie reviewer he is just some good guy making videos for a living
yes and in case you didn't get this from the beginning, we see schultz introduce Django to this technique later in the movie to find Hilde.
@@proscatesgamesyt6431 no , cinemasins just uses this as an excuse. he has many videos on his second channel where he actually reviews movies. the criticism he has in his actual review make it into cinema sins video
Thanks batman
I've watched this movie several times but I don't think he was specifically looking for django himself, he was searching for a slave that had any info on that specific farm. He just happened to run into django
Minus 2 sins
Didn't he specifically ask for a man named django?
@@thedawnhasbeengreeted3571 I don't recall, he mightve
Nope dr. Schultz knows one slave came from the carucan plantation. Thats when he asks whose from the plantation and Django says "i am". Shultz goes down the line looking for who said that he passes by Django but goes back cuz hes the only one not acting scared and is kinda just staring at the floor. He asks what his name "Django" "well Django your just the man im looking for"
@@hamiltonmcgregor5534 oh right
The word "motherfucker" is not an anachronism if it is said by Samuel L. Jackson, no matter what the time period is.
Samuel L Jackson, Chuck Noris for black people.
Alex-Zander Browne That's racist. *ding*
Elbi Chomio ''I make fire motherfucker!''
+Pussycock Titsass "Enough is enough. I'm sick of this motherfucking plagues in this motherfucking Egypt!"
+timburtonlivesinmybasement3 stfu
1000 degree glowing knife vs django's balls
KazooLordHD Django's balls ftw!
haha dead
Who would win?
The one and only thing with the amazing capability to pass on the human genome?
Or
One glowy boi
This joke really dates itself lul
tarantino´s acting and accent isnt a sin, its fun
I like Tarantino the very good Director, who should know better than to cast Tarantino the very bad actor.
It wasn't so bad in this movie, but he sucked so fucking bad for waaaay too long in Pulp Fiction.
WHO THE FACK IS SMITTY BACALL!?
I actually think Tarantino's acting is good. Maybe not too great compared to the great actors he's been casting in his movies for over 2 decades, but I actually think his role as an actor is pretty good and well placed in his movies.
@@adolfodavila6158 except for his narration, that shit was awful. He did good in pulp fiction
@@razorcola5434 Hateful Eight..
I have to remove one sin for "the boy is a natural" some people do have a natural gift with firearms. Not saying a 30 year old who has never fired or held a rifle can make a shot like django pulled off every time, but some people do have a natural gift.
Lol back when the sins were largely continuity errors.
The good old days
The movie is juss so good. What can a body say about it without nitpicking..... I'll wait
The only things wrong with this movie are continuity errors.
Kyl Harrt It's also what CinemaSins did exclusively, now almost everything is a sin. He literally marks a sin for his comments, even if they aren't even remotely a sin.
lol
So no sins off for Leo's scene with the glass? Which was unscripted? Aw come on, Jeremy!
ohepi I’m kinda sad he didn’t do negative sins but it would be at a really low sin count maybe even below zero
This us the old CinemaSins, before sin removal and other runtime-padding tricks.
tired of people blaming the creators for padding the run time when RUclips literally tells them if they're 10 minutes long they can make twice the money if I told you if you wore a hat all day you could make twice as much money would you of course you would STFU
the cut may have been real but i'd bet all my savings that when he rubbed the blood on her that was made in to a scene with fake blood because of the scene where it was real, given this day and age no fucker would get away with deliberately doing that with your blood to someone else at work
@@danny1229c I mean she had to know she was going to be in for some kind of messed up improvisation, when Leonardo DiCaprio is literally her bloody co-actor.
You forgot the bullet that killed Ms. Laura was fired from an angle, but sent her flying straight back. Physics professors would lose their shit if they saw that.
Especially considering it's a physical impossibility for a bullet to send someone flying back in the first place.
***** depends on the bullet... if you got hit by a a-10 fligh by i bet you would fly...
veiga devil Yeah, but Newton's Third Law says the shooter would fly back as far as the target. Plus, I don't think any bullet would have enough mass to transfer enough kinetic energy to the target, either.
***** well those bullets are made to destroy heavy tanks search a-10c warthog
veiga devil I did, but the laws of physics still say otherwise.
I’m here 7 years later just to appreciate this movie getting sinned for having belt loops before they were invented. Well done
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
but he didnt sin the fact they are using lever actions, which were invented a few years after this movie takes place (last I checked)
Django's "traditional" sunglasses hadn't been invented?
Anyone who works in the sun COULD HAVE created an uncredited device
Or enacted an uncredited modification...
3:41 Also, lady that got shot must have been hit from the front by a 80mm cannon shell the exact second she was shot by Django...
'Bye, miss laura'
"lmao yeet"
It’s a reference to old westerns where they wouldn’t show explicit on screen violence against women
@@hrevo6490 That actually makes sense... Okey, neat little dynamic there.
That was funny
Mr. Techaky that shot reaction was over the top. 🤣. 80mm Cannon 🤣🤣
“Für Elise” was written in 1810. It fits in the timeline. Beer taps were used in the 1800s. Straws have been around forever and we’re very popular in the 1800s.
and King Schultz was German, so he probably knew french
ding
ding
ding
@@edwarddeguzman3258 as a German: can you please explain your reasoning behind this?
@@antoniusblock3316 simple he was a learned man at one time and as. German you know France is next door so it’s not improbable he knows French
How the fuck could you know that “Für Elise” was written in 1810, and yet not know that it was undiscovered and unpublished until 1867?
How about the needlessly complicated and overly expensive rescue plot?
Monsieur Candy likes money. Show up to the plantation, WITHOUT Django, and say "I heard you have a German speaking slave girl, you see, I'm from Germany and I would pay you HANDSOMELY for a German speaking slave girl because..." Then if Candy is dismissive, start waving the money in his face that was eventually paid for the gladiator. Done! No need to be there for days. No need to witness the brutality. No need to shed any blood or get yourself killed.
django had to confirm it was his wife?
They knew where she was and there can't be any other German speaking slave woman named Brunhilda at the exact plantation. He could confirm her backstory and marriage to Django with her in German prior to purchasing her freedom.
Or he could have taken Django for confirmation's sake, and forget about the sad gladiator angle.
They do the whole gladiator thing so they can tell Calvin Candy they'll pay a handsome sum for him so Calvin would get all excited and then they can just be like "hey while we're at it let's add on this German-speaking slave for kicks for a cheap price since we're already buying your other slave for a ton of money". In the end they were just going take Hildie and never come back for or pay for the gladiator, it was so they wouldn't have to pay a lot for Hildie. It was also to throw the scent of their trail so Calvin wouldn't be too suspicious of why they wanted to buy Hildie so badly-- If Calvin found out that they wanted to buy her because she was Django's wife, he most likely would never have sold her or he would have grossly overcharged for her.
LaneyBeth
C'mon! Even Tarantino admits the plot is overly complicated and attributes it to the German guy's personality...
no need to make good movie. just buy a slave...
You should have taken away sins for Leo’s acting EVEN when he cut his hand open
Props to the female actress for not freaking the fuck out when Leo got his blood on her face. The feeling of thick, warm, sticky blood had to have send chills down her spine
@@azbeast1 Props??? Are you crazy, no fucking way would anybody let him smear real blood on their face you know what kinda lawsuits that would bring on???
@@azbeast1 that was fake tho
@@azbeast1 and why dont say kerry Washington
They didnt take of sins when this video wad made
You guys had to dig really deep for sins.
And consider that it is a film that is almost 3 hours long, it shouldn't be difficult. Just goes to show how much care Tarantino prepares a film with.
I know, you can tell they were struggling. Some of by this is just dumb shit
+Imre Kiss Propaganda? Are you a racist or something? Its a fun movie, so is inglorious basterds. Im no american but I still enjoy seeing brad pitt and his gang killing hitler...
Snorre Productions This movie is racist against white people. I am white man and I'm anti-racist. And yes, this is left wing propaganda - political correctness.
Imre Kiss No its not, it makes fun of racist people not white people. Its like in inglorious basterds, it makes the nazi look bad and not the actual german people. I feel no shame when I watch django unchained or fifty years a slave for that matter, because Im not a racist. I see the "bad white people" in the movies as different people than myself. If Jamie Fox's character was cut from the movie and we just saw Christoph Waltz going around killing slavers, would it still be racist against white people? Django doesn't kill people because they are white, he kills them because they are racist slave owners. Take the harvard racist test and get supprised by your ignorant prejudice
I love the EWW videos, including this one, but I disagree with Django being responsible for D'Artagnan's fate. He's not even 1% responsible, really. D'Artagnan was a dead man the second the dogs ran him up the tree. There was nothing Django or Dr. Schultz could do for him. Offering to reimburse Candy for $500 would have only done one thing: exposed the fact that Dr. Schultz is a human being with compassion, which makes absolutely no sense if you are trying to pose as a slave-trader. Luckily, Django spoke up to cover for Dr. Schultz and thereby convinced Candy that he was a heartless slave-trader without an ounce of compassion or humanity in him, which is what they had to do to be successful. The film gives hints the whole time that Candy is... kind of dumb. He isn't a slack-jawed idiot, but you can slip something by him if you do it right, and he won't catch it. Indeed, if it weren't for Stephen, their plan would have worked perfectly. Stephen is spineless, selfish, and evil, but he's cunning and smart. He initially seems to be like an ignorant child throwing a fit, but he sees everything, and without him, any con-artist with above average intelligence could come along and take advantage of Candy, who is painfully aware and insecure about his intellectual shortcomings. Django is obviously much smarter than Candy, and Candy depends on Stephen's intelligence and loyalty. This tears at his ego. Such a solidly enjoyable movie, with many things going on beneath the surface.
`
This!
If Django didn't prevent his death, then that made the entire scene pointless
well put, trully
slaves aren't responsible for anything because they didn't ask to come here and to be slaves fafo white people
The reason why he knows about Django already is because of the 1966 movie Django and the movies that followed it, he's meant to be that same character, meaning he already has a reputation
Thats interesting...
...what?
Rappatiligoe0419 The character Django already had a reputation, as he's the same character from the other 'Django' films, which is why king schultz already knows who he is
snipars
That doesn't work, cause he actually meets the OG Django at some point in the movie, aka Franco Nero. The guy he says "it's Django, the d is silent" to.
Dude...this movie takes place in the 1800s, when slavery is still in place. Do you not realize that slavery was abolished BEFORE the Django movies came out?? Those movies hadn't been created yet smh.
“If he’s a natural why does he need a practice montage?”
Well I was a natural at boxing but you don’t see me beating the shit out of Pacquiao don’t you?
A talent or skill without practice is just wasted... guess these morons don't know that...
@@topg1703 or my guess is u r the moron and this video is just in good fun
Yeah thats just stupid if you are natural good at something that doesnt mean you dont have to practice to become even better
Nice. I consider this a victory: none of these sins are actually plot holes, just criticisms of style or continuity.
the bonus should've been the amount of times the N-word was said.
Well concidering how common the phrase was back then I don't think that's a movie sin.
The bonuses aren't necessarily for "errors", bonus rounds often just highlight things that happen to occur often (for Spielberg films it's lens flares).
+James Gardner you mean JJ.Abrahams
Dino lol you srsly afraid for the word damn grow tf up
Dino you mean nigga
I'm far from being a Tarantino's fanboy, but the fact they had to pick such small details to make this video just show how a good director and screenwriter is Quentin.
The fact that you went into a Cinemasins video and took sarcasm seriously means you're just like those who criticize the amount of blood in this film: You didnt get the point ;)
They didn't even point out the most obvious problems with this movie. Wanted posters didn't exist back then or anytime outside of Hollywood movies. The posse wearing hoods over their heads would have had no reason to conceal their identities or meet secretly at night, given what year it's supposed to be. Actually, it would be easier to just say that the Django universe has a lot of things in it that didn't exist until post Civil War. Kinda like Inglorious Bastards has a lot of presumptions and realities that didn't exist until after 1945. That's probably what bothers me the most about Tarantino with these two movies. It's like doing a story taking place in 1970 and have people using cell phones and driving hybrids, but Nixon is president and promising to end the Vietnam War.
E x o You do realize that those small details don't actually matter? Example: On the basterds (yes, that is the spelling of the movie), they kill hitler and top ss/gestapo officials.
You know, because that TOTALLY happened in real life at the time.
Daniel Acosta The only reason these things bother me is because there's plenty of movies out there that get their historical context and realities correct, while producing a completely fictional narrative. Tarantino seems to have half-assed this aspect.
this movie is shit. tarantinos worst by far
Only 4 minutes. Cinema must’ve approved of this one
This was one of the channel's first videos, back when they didn't sin every little detail.
Tbh i was expecting a "thats racist" joke...
Nah this was back when they were good.
It's a joke it's not being a sjw lol, yu guys seem so triggered with sjw you create it yourself lol
Its a historical movie, they gotta have accuracy
I haven't seen a bad guy fumbling his gun in a movie for years.
no n-word bonus round? 😂
It would've been 109
285
the most in any feature length film
Nigga9
Lost CinemaSins video: Jeremy says the n-word.
“Horse goes down with the rider but is instantly back up in the next shot.” I have seen many horses fall and they do indeed get back up scary fast
3:40 You didn't mention how oddly Miss Lara was blown back by the gun? You know... like how the trajectory of the bullet would have launched her in the same direction that the bullet was traveling? Not randomly to the left?
Tarantino's law of physics.
I noticed that the first time I watched it and was hoping he would mention it, how did he not mention it?
Thunderbird457 Same here.
The Mashed Autismo The Laws of Tarantino! lol
Tarantino stated in an interview that it was supposed to be over the top and comical. I thought it was fucking hilarious.
Schultz is by far, one of the best characters in cinema. Waltz did excellent.
The weird thing about this movie is that it's about a slave escaping slavery, but he's not actually a nice guy. He's the same asshole sociopath that's in all Tarantino's movies. I was going to say that makes it racist, but now I'm wondering. A lot of actual slave narratives from before the Civil War made the slaves out to be saints. Some abolitionists argued that black people were better Christians because they were so kind and submissive. In a way, this movie is more of a response to that. When Django wins, he doesn't win for his race, he wins for himself. He's not a representative of anything, he's just some guy trying to pursue happiness and his own idea of what's right.
So, the Oppressed Anti-Hero/Anti-Heroine who gets the opportunity to fight back, which Tarantino first played with in Inglorious?
Correction: which Tarantino does in every movie i have seen.
they don't do that in Hateful Eight.
Django wasn't a sociopath. His mission was to get his wife back FIRST. He was willing to do everything necessary to get her too. I guess you missed the part where hesitated to kill the man in front of his boy.
this is what every single slave should've did, like for real imagine if every slave just started saying fck that submissive shyt. Like a good ole Local Union picket line the slaves stop and endure the pain they would've had for not doing the work
Movie sins: 53
Sentence: Absolutely fucking amazing anyway.
This really makes me want to watch this movie again...
Also, I am very curious about the "Random Cameo" you mentioned at 34 seconds. I've never been good with faces. But who is that?
EeT MeeL She's Amber Tamblyn, AKA the "Daughter of a Son of a Gunfighter"
David Caballero killer. Thanks.
Is it rewatchable?
Sam Kresil Extremely I’ve seen it 3-4 times and loved it every time
I just came to say that I did not watch this video and refuse to because nothing is wrong with Django unchained bye
You clearly dont understand the point of these videos.
You should, some of tham are legit "sins". Like magical self-filling glasses. Shadows not corresponding with position of the sun, etc.
twon This is old cinemasins, where most of the sins are actually valid. His videos are still entertaining now, but it's lost that 'genuine' feeling to the sins.
You watched the video. You just figured that you'd seem badass, which. . .no. You're not a badass.
You forgot about him shooting the guy in the bath and how he stood up so fast
so there was no sin count for how that lady was shot from one direction then flew off at an angle that didn't make sense? Cmon i was waiting for that one :(
aidan sim A lot of the things mentioned in this video were intentional.
On top of that, she shouldn't have been blown away anyway. That bullet should have just gone through her with very little knockback, unless Django invented a rubber bullet just to be softer on her. I always thought her death was a little harsh anyway though. ^_^
It's meant to look fantastic besides bitch deserved it lol
damn i never realized that dynamite was created 10 years after this movie takes place
The oldest straws we know of where found in a tomb from 3000 B.C.E. Beer taps where invented in 1785, and Für Elise was composed in 1810. Slavery wasn't abolished until 1865, giving the movie a time frame of 55 years when it could've taken place. Also, Schultz speaks french (as we saw in the scene before he met mr. Candy). So you better knock of 4 sins from that bonus round
***** you are right. It wasn't published until 1867...two years after the end of the civil war and 40 years after Beethoven's death...so that is likely the only true anachronism on the list.
***** Even if they weren't *widely* used, that doesn't mean Candie couldn't have them. He was very wealthy, after all.
***** Anachronism: a thing belonging or appropriate to a period other than that in which it exists, especially a thing that is conspicuously old-fashioned. In this case, saying "it's unlikely... _but_..." makes that thing not an anachronism. How is that poor justification? If you really wanna go that route, then justifying _anything_ in a work of fiction should be avoided.
***** Oh, we have a miscommunication error here. I thought you were referring to the beer taps, not the straws. You didn't make clear which of the first two items (straws or beer taps) were not widely used in your original reply. I don't see how the fact that something did exist at the time makes my statements "high-minded philosophies". It existed during the time period, therefore it is not an anachronism. Simple as that.
***** Like I said, I thought we were talking about beer taps originally, not straws.
"Straws, as physical objects in the world at the time - not an anachronism. Straws in that man's home, given that they weren't a thing in America until years afterward - anachronism."
This is a fair point that I can't argue against. However, and this brings us back full circle, as a man with his wealth and culture, it is not _impossible_ that he _could_ have something that existed in the world but was not commonplace in America. In this instance, yes, it is poor justification. But even poor justification is better than a complete anachronism, at least in my opinion. Cheers.
0:32 The woman looking out the window is Amber Tamblyn. Her father is Russ Tamblyn who had starred in the movie "Son of a Gunfighter". They both make a cameo appearance and are credited as "Son of a Gunfighter" and "Daughter of a Son of a Gunfighter" It's more of an inside joke between Tarantino and both of 'em.
russ is a legend 😊
One of the biggest anacrhonisms you missed somehow, was the fact Django had sunglasses, which weren't developed until the early 1900's.
not true tainted glasses were a thing in the 1800 also the idea of tainted glasses goes back further thin that to the time of plague when it was believed that red glasses were thought to help prevent the plague from getting in the eyes
@@typhusnurgle409 goes even further back to China, they've found stone sunblockers
@@Battlefieldfan146 cool did not know that
its just a film buddy... the reality was much worse
@@karlnicholls15 I'm sorry did you comment on the wrong post or something ?
Btw Shultz only carries one bullet so that’s why he’s like “lol my bad” before getting blasted
the gun has two barrels, and he shot the sherrif twice earlier. If you say he reloaded, we never saw him do that during the sherrif scene.
But I think the real reason he doesn't fight back is because he knew his escape was impossible. And his death might cause Django and Hildi to live.
3:41 He forgot about the part where Miss Lara's body breaks the laws of physics. Normally I would say it's just a movie and who cares except that almost everyone in the world thought this looked stupid.
tarrker I agree but I think it looked stupid on purpose...
Yeah, this is the bit that bugged me the most in the movie.
That was bloody funny though. Who cares?
George Unitt It was indeed a very good movie. But this scene definitely stuck out like a sore thumb. It certainly bothered me, along with almost every "sin" this video covers. But then I'm just one of THOSE people who tend to notice everything wrong with a movie.
Although, none of this ruined the movie, I'd say. Certainly not for me. I loved it. But it's still fun to talk about all the goofy stuff that happens in movies :)
I really don't think it clashed with the rest of the film at all. Did you see the ridiculous amount of blood in the first Candyland shoutout? Did you see how far back Schultz was thrown by a shotgun? Did you see Tarantino's character EXPLODE when he was shot while holding dynamite? I don't think he was going for realism.
half those things are what made the movie hilarious.
You know the movie good when the mistakes video is only 4m long
Also 4 minutes long for a 3 hour movie.
That's not true at all, this is back when they did very short videos. This is a good movie, but look at Alien he posted today for example, he said it's his favorite Sci fi horror movie ever, but it's still 11 minutes of sins because they now do much longer videos presumably because the way you make money on RUclips has changed.
yea but it was only 4 minutes for prometheus, and we know that wasn't a good movie
And most of it was lame goofs like "beers half full.. now it's full!"
naw the older videos were much more lenient than newer ones. I consider Hateful 8 a much better film than this pile of crap, but that has many more sins.
You can tell that he loves this movie. A lord of the rings-length movie, with the shortest video.
All of these sins can be resolved with the phrase, "Because Tarantino"
lol
You missed one anachronism. After Django has his hair cut, he spends the rest of the film sporting a downtown Fade complete with a perfect shape up, a haircut that only came into prominence during the late 50s... Sorry, its a black people thing...
Also, Django has sunglasses. Another anachronism missed...
the true that hairline doe
AND the biggest bullshit in the movie of a slave saying or knowing about a "silent" letter in his name. "DJANGO…the 'J' is silent."
LOL! YESSS…the fade…a black thing is right; I noticed that immediately.
I feel also some parts in the movie when he "Django" talks back/ bad to white people pre 1860 he would be killed immediately.
This movie is basically flawless and definitely one of the greatest movies of all time
+JPproductions32 this post needs more upvotes
No movie is flawless. sorry
+Anthony DeLuca This movie and a few others are damn near it though.
Watch Jeremy's conversation with himself about this movie
+Adam Flint Like a sub sandwich needs more baloney.
You know its an amazing movie when its 3 hours long and only has 4 minutes worth of criticism
definately one of my favourite movies
+Igar Dub same
+Adam Flint I laughed so hard when he shot Candie's suster and she flew as if she was pulled back by the demons.
+TheBlibitty Blab THE demons? As in specific demons? Did we miss a scene with them?
Magoo7956 NOT real demons. LOL. Just imagine itd be so funny bro. :D
same here
Such a great, entertaining, satisfying movie! Love it!!! I just wish the doctor didn't die.
+Xpzilla Really an unnecessary death too. I get the whole being to proud to shake a slave owner's hand thing and it was a really badass way to go, but I don't think its worth it.
+Meta Nightmare445 I think he wanted to die, he couldn't live with the fact that he caused D'artagnan death
+Meta Nightmare445 He just couldnt resist.
Xpzilla true.
Dont worry,he'll regenerate....oh wait i was talking about the other Doctor sorry
1. Most exposition in movies are just that, exposition.
2. Later in the film they show records which assuming he looked at in order to find a slave that would be close to his location that had come from that plantation. But hey, I'm optimistic.
3. Don't know who she is so don't really care.
4-6. Continuity is hard, have you tried making a movie? I did and we had to keep re-shooting because the director was a perfectionist so one of the actors went from a buzz cut to five inch growth instantaneously. But also, blame the director of photography, that's one of their jobs.
7. They also could have moved him so his shadow would change and not confuse the face that the shadows from the buildings in the background are in a different direction.
8. She's talking to Django in some weird flashback/weird dream/memory of her. Give the guy a break, he hasn't seen her in a while.
9. It was only there for comedic purposes, get over it.
10. Not everyone has photographic memory, also this is in better detail than my dreams. Mine are mainly blobs that somehow make a story.
11. It was also the south in the 1800s, everyone was baptist or pious. I forget which one.
12. He was also seen drinking earlier, when I drink I can't function a belt buckle.
13. Actually, I'll give you that one because it didn't make sense to me either.
14. He was guessing, he probably wasn't even there when his wife made the bags. Or hell they probably had their slaves do it. He's a busy white man who didn't have time to count.
15. Or maybe he got lucky.
16. He explained earlier he needed his help and by now they have built a relationship so he cares if Django dies in Mississippi. Also, more money=better freedom.
17. Because even naturals need to train, that's the basis of almost every sports movie. Also being a natural does not make him an expert.
18. He was probably just waiting to see what he'd do. He's never seen a free slave and doesn't know if he's timid or not. Hell, I'd be just watching too.
19. Continuity.
20. Would you rather them text each other, that's rude. Oh wait...
21. That was a stressful moment, I'd shoot the asshole too.
22. I'm gonna give that one to you. Maybe he's deaf or just slow.
23. That gun only has one bullet, how was he going to get away or defeat Butch in time?
24-25. Young thugs make stupid mistakes. Also if I'm not mistaken, wasn't he shot which made him turn in the first place? And yes he made a better shield.
26. You just expect actors to not breathe? The only fault is that they left him on screen for too long so we could see him moving.
27. Yeah balls weren't necessary but also showed how vulnerable he was. Hmm...I'm torn.
28-29. I'll give it to you.
30. I guess they didn't care that much to steal his wanted posters out of his pocket.
31. They also weren't the brightest, they gave slaves a bag of dynamite. If one of they found a piece of glass they could use it and the hot sun to start demanding some shit, or accidentally commit suicide. Whatever came first.
32. Well that was the point of him saving Hilde too, but I guess you forgot that.
33. Hmm...the slave owners had guns and the slaves hands were tied. Yeah their odds weren't going to be good either way.
34. Because, movie.
35. Maybe he liked looking at balls.
36. This is his way of making amends.
37-39. I'll give you that one. Also, how did she defy physics?
40. If something went wrong, she's still on a horse. She could flee any moment.
41. Yeah but it wouldn't be as bad ass.
42. Again, comedic relief.
Anachronism spelled wrong. You know everything has spell check nowadays.
It wasn't a Q&A, jesus
I never claimed to be your messiah.
Yea a lot of his points are fairly pointless in this one. There are a few things that do make since, but a lot if it is nit picking nits that don't even exist. I feel like this video was really scrounged together to try to piggyback off of a popular movie, too bad.
23. The derringer model King Shultz uses has two.
Pine Apple No, only one, every time that gun was used in this movie, it only shot once, like when Django killed Ellis Brittle. The only time you saw it fire twice was when you saw Schultz kill the town sheriff but you can easily see that he reloaded it before the second shot.(there was a huge time gap)
2:30 the derringer hidden gun is one shot and slow to reload, he had no chance against Butch and he knew it.
"Miss Lara should've fallen to her left when Django shoots her, but instead falls to her backside.."
ding!
+utkarsh sankrityayan she don't fall... that mfer flys
ding
that was obviously meant to be like that, this is a Tarantino movie so don't ask
CinemaSins needs to do an updated version on this movie. They made this when they didn’t really GO IN on movies like they do now
If you haven't noticed, for truly good movies, he keeps the sins low. If you look at other older videos of CinemaSins, you'll see him sin a lot more on worse movies
They did. Now they sin things that arent sins and make random stupid and unfunny jokes
@@reptilesceptile1035 so... Like always?
@@AlinaAniretake they used to make good video's
You forgot about the weird impossible angle Miss Lara is flung at when Django shoots her, she would've hit the door jam but instead is flung left into the room.
+Dustin James Adams Also the fact that she was flung back that much by such a small gun.
I learnt this recently on QI, that if we are shot, we don't naturally fall over, we do just because we see it in films. Thus, the woman that was shot could easily have assumed herself to be shot elsewhere, supported subsequently flying as she thought fit. Of, course, films weren't around then, so maybe that's just a sin on the film.
Jonathan Hayward *ping*
+Dustin James Adams
Actually when someone is shot they never go flying like that . Physics says that every action has a reaction meaning that for someone to go flying that far the person firing the gun would also go flying back that far . But it does make good tv.
Do you people know what 'comedy' is? It was supposed to be funny and not taken seriously!
One thing I would count to this:
Where Calvin Candie puts out a skull, which he now had many years, only to explain somethig and then destroy it in one second. Or does he have a full stock with this?
first of all, Samuel L. Jackson is not Samual L. Jackson if he doesnt say "motherfucker" at least twice in the movie and all possible variations.
Second, Tarantino is not Tarantino is he doesn't include shots violating a whole episode of Mythbusters by making it launch ppl across the room like a cannonball (although Candie's sister was an obvious "cable pulling her from behind" overkill shot.)
Actually, that was a homage to old westerns where women were always thrown off screen if shot so you couldn't see them die or their corpses.
I think her being thrown in a completely ludicrous direction was meant both as a joke and to call attention to the homage.
hilariousnickname
except the fact Tarantino is making a homage to his own cliché xD
Well, horses don't like not standing, so if a horse is down, he's gonna jump right back up if he can
Don't lie, you had a hard time finding much to complain about in this movie.
So true this movie is awesome
Ikr
+ash ketchum eh...it kind of sucked
+3rd Gunman This is a fun movie to watch, it's not supposed to taken seriously.
***** Dude don't give me that deep fried horse $#!t....
Bad writing is bad writing.
Bad directorial tone is bad directorial tone.
Airplane is supposed to be fun, Evil Dead 2, is suppose to be fun, Big Trouble in Little China, Zoolander, Tropic Thunder,
Under Cover Brother, Killer Klowns from Outter Space, Blazing Saddles if you want to mention another western. But their tone is consistent and their stories no matter how silly, don't violate their own mythos for the sake of looking or sounding cool. Some of you Tarantino fans are as bad as Nolan fans.
You just won't acknowledge the flaws. Of course it's supposed to be fun....that's the problem it wasn't fun. It was one of QT worst if you ask me. I know it's just my opinion, but I'm so sick of hearing it's not supposed to be serious or it's just a kids movie.
So if I have my house painted is it ok if the guys I pay do a $#!tty job in my kid's room or
it's the TV room it's just suppose to be fun.
GTHO!
The guys turned to the side at 2:34 because theres a small visual close up shot before the one you showed. Django shoots him through the stomach and he reacted by spinning from the hit of the bullet which is why you see a blood-stained splatter on the front of his shirt before Django shoots his arm
3:42 the way she fly's off made me laugh so hard when I was watching the film
That was pretty funny. Would not have noticed if I hadn't of seen your comment. lol
I love this movie but why isn't that a sin she flies back in such a completely unrealistic direction and also why didn't he kill Sheba, I mean she was right there with Stephen on the whole "turned their back on the kind deal"
Daniel Long It's not a sin since it was intentionally done to be a homage to the way that women's deaths were dealt with in old westerns.
How is breaking the laws of physics a homage to dealing with a woman's death. There's a lot of homages in this movie i.e. Amber Tamblyn's superfluous cameo that are labeled sins. So homage or no homage It's still should be a sin. In short -- a sin by any other name is just as sinful
All of CinemaSin's videos make me see films completely differently!
influencable idiot :D
1900bib True though. Millions of dollars go into these productions then you see all these little mistakes!
MrDeemsMusic Cheers m8
You forgot to add that Django was wearing sunglasses but they hadn’t been invented yet.
Are you serious? This was set in the 17th century and sunglasses were invented in the 12th century... Did you never have history class in school?
DNF Danninetyf The pre cursor to sunglasses were invented in 12th century China. They actually started to become readily available in the United States in the early 20th century. So while you right, Django still wouldn’t have had sunglasses. (Btw I don’t care about it in the movie i’m just saying..)
@@four-twenty4205 Do yourself a favor and delete this idiotic comment.
@@patrickmorrissey3084 - Behave.
@@four-twenty4205 Get your centuries correct.
It's amazing how these videos went from like 4 to 5 minutes a piece and now they are usually 20 minutes. It is amazing to see the growth of a channel
Still better than overrated hunger games
I think there is no more than 100 people on this planet who would say otherwise. Hunger games is not overrated since it is considered average, not good, while this movie is considered amazing as it is.
+Kristian Vukajlovic I'm surprised you didn't consider THIS movie overrated (because it is) - especially considering how it's the typical Tarantino trash. Few moments are quite good, but nothing exceptional.
Nightowl To be honest, I am not a Tarantino fan, but I did love this one. I think Pulp Fiction is overrated, since it is considered by people (IMDB) to be one of the top 10 while it's not. I think Inglorious bastards is overrated, maybe even The hateful eight, but I got interested in this one and I enjoyed it. I don't think this one is perfect, just very good. Especially I have seen a lot of bad films in the few days before this one, so I may have remembered it to be better than it is.
A Mentoz Hunger Lame
A Mentoz Any Tarantino film in a totally different league than Hunger games
The name "Broomhilda" should be sinned as fuck... Especially when she supposedly got the name from her previous german owners. A german would know, that the name is actually Brunhilda. Broomhilda is nothing.
+Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg A German would know, that the name is actually Brunhilde (Brünhild in older German).
+BLABLABLABLABLABL298 Thank you... Sorry for that mistake, Brunhilda was actually a czech version of the name. Never mind, the "broom" part was what pissed me off...
Sinned sure, but could be that the name she had, she didn't know how to spell. After being transferred around between slave owners the obvious mis-spelling of the name occurred because a trader sounded out the name and assumed it was spelled phonetically.
Or somebody severely overlooked this in the script. Being Tarantino however, anything could go.
SlamifiedBuddafied
That is one possible explanation, but it still got on my nerves. :-)
***** It's a pet peeve, I hear 'ya.
i feel like tarentino puts in continuity errors on purpose
+SkizzlePiano Like little easter eggs or you know he wants the best shots of dialogue and can live with the fact that there are some errors.
I'm positive he does at least a few on purpose, just for lulz
+Zak Azougay yeah, he likes to make fun of the physics of old cowboy movies
SkizzlePiano : I think he did
Dr. Schultz final action in not a plot error, it shouldn't have been counted as a sin.
Yes, it was irrational; blinded by his emotions, Schultz killed Candie after the last humiliation, and in doing so, ruined the plan and got himself killed.
Doing something deeply regretful in the heat of the moment is very common in real life, and Schultz's case is waaay more justifiable than most.
Why doesn't Leo have an Oscar yet
Coyg
Coyg
Coyg
1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9ify coyg
9th isnt so bad ha ha
"THEY call me hildi"
"Who the fuck is she talking to?"
Iconic.
Another anachronism, Django's sunglasses
There's evidence of sunglasses as far as the 14th century.
+Weirdude777 sunglasses were not around in the antebellum south though
That was on purpose. Tarantino was homaging a Charles Bronson movie that was a Western. Can't remember the name of it though.
Charles Bronson was in lots of westerns, even starred in western t.v. shows like Wagon Train, Wanted Dead Or Alive etc.
You would have to be more specific.
Another sin is he spelled anachronism wrong
How do you bring up things that don't make sense but just not mention the gravity defying feat that lady pulled off when she got shot and flew back into the other room.
Great video. That dig on Tarantino made me laugh harder than it should. Great movie.
The reason for Shultz shooting candy was because the whole adventure is being compared to Siegfried's mission to save Brunhilde. Siegfried was known in legend for never compromising his morals
at 3:40, she should have gone flying into the edge of the doorway (because of the angle at which she's shot at), but instead she goes into the other room like someone right in front of her had shot her.
That's just Tarantino being Tarantino.
She wouldn't have flown like that at all, to any angle. It's part of the humor in the scene.
I was audibly laughing in the theater at that scene it was just great
MLGxProxFaggot That's what I just said...
***** Yes, but the shooter is prepped for it, usually pushing their body slightly forward; the person who got shot, isn't.
What about the mysterious girl (seen twice) who dresses like a dude and wares the bandana on her face the entire time?
She's suppose to be a reference to the original Django in which the bad guys the original Django looked almost the same as her. Also there was suppose to be a back story about her which QT decide not to put. The movie's still awesome either way.
That's Zoe Bell! You can't leave out Zoe Bell.
that struck me as something which was removed from the final cut like how Matthew Fox is in World War for about 6 seconds
Kieran Etoria-King *world war z
She actually knew about the real Django and she was originally going to be the one that blew his cover.
you missed that when Leo meet Samuel outside the house, the sun always change position. When we see riders coming in it's almost no shadow because the sun is so high up, next scene it's sunset with really long shadows and red light and after that it's cloudy, and it keeps on like that
What's wrong with Dr. Schultz pronouncing valet correctly he is clearly an educated man and it's not that far fetched for him to know that especialy since he is from Europe.
+william marshall He actually speaks fluent French in the film
+william marshall Besides, don't English-speaking regions pronounce it the French way as well?
actually the correct pronunciation is vallet not valley
Yup, I don't know why it was a sin
It was a joke peo... this guy is never serious...ggeeezzzz
3:40 Django curves bullets
*ding*
+Null
So.. Django killed 9/11?
+Null You can see the bullet hit her in the arm, she just goes flying in an impossible direction. Still a sin *ding*
+Null I KNOW! I noticed that the first time i saw the movie XD
I feel complaining about anachronism in a "historical " Tarantino movie kinda misses the point about watching a Tarantino movie, I mean he killed off Hitler in France with 1000 gunshots, and I feel that was the right way to go.
Finally another intelligent person who understands the essence of a Tarantino movie. Cheers! :)
I literally watch you videos so I don’t have to rewatch the movies again. Best channel ever
Th3 Birdman is a better channel. They sin and critique all the things that this channel gets wrong about movies.
It also says “1858, two years before the start of the Civil War” in the opening scene.
The Civil War began in 1861.
Michael Gallas 😂😂😂😂😂
Well it was like December so it still makes sense
Anita Remenárová !!!!
This is when the history books credit the start...
But in order for “Confederate” soldiers to fire on “Union” soldiers at Fort Sumter...
One would have to assume some divisions prior to April of 1861...
It’s highly unlikely they picked sides and threw together armies the morning of the conflict.
It just MIGHT have taken a bit of forethought.
Ya think?
@@BillMcGirr Well the war didn't officially start until April 1861.. the first real full scale battle wasn't until July of that same year at Manassas Junction.
To whom it may concern:
I don't know if you covered this but it falls under the kind of things you like to cover.
In Django Unchained, Django was totally unnecessary to the execution of their plan in the second act. If Django never went with Schultz, Steven never would have picked up on the tension in the room. They would have never been discovered and the movie would have been really short and uneventful.
They explain this in the film. He doesn't go for no reason.
Sure they find some lame reason for him to go. A role to play but in reality he didn't need to go.
THANK YOU. Out of the comments I've read nobody realized this and I can't believe he didn't mention it. And actually, what would've been wrong with Schultz just wanting to buy a slave who speaks German? I'm sure Candie would have sold her and bam, mission accomplished. Other than that, great movie (unlike the horrible ones he usually covers).
why is pronouncing valet as val-ay a sin? thats how its supposed to be pronounced...
yes and america has a lot of respect for foreign cultures
LattiMonstaaa subtlety just isn't our thing.
You're right. Also, he's German and was clearly educated, It's perfectly feasible that he would pronounce it correctly.
It's more likely that our beloved critic/narrator just doesn't know how to pronounce "valet." Only recent;ly have people started mispronouncing "foyer" too.
David Rector Really? if I heard someone pronounce "foyer" how it is spelled I would piss myself laughing!
Cinema Sins: ruining your childhood since 2012.
My goal is now to put this on every video by Cinema Sins. Wish me luck.
At 3:39 There is no way that the angle he shot that lady from could make her fly back like that in the particular direction.
Everyone knows that, but the shot is so fun so they did it anyway.
Slumpen Fex I know. I was only saying it for relation of the video. Thats one of my favorite scenes in that movie.
lmao
Obviously not without wires or cooperation.
THANK YOU!
One thing you forgot to mention was how miss Lara flew sideways into the room when she was shot like she was just blasted by a cannon that was 3 feet in front of her. Even if a gun that size would do that to a person, which it wouldn’t, she would not go that direction from the trajectory of the bullet.
I still wonder why CinemaSins isn't hired by directors to polish their movies
Same.
Cause it's easy to point out shit you don't like after the fact than it is to make something from scratch. If you could make a movie, or a script, you wouldn't be a critic, you'd be a creator. If you can't do, teach.
Caferino yeah, because producers love it when movies take longer to shoot and go over budget to get the details just right. 👌
If CinemaSins become the movie polish-er , then your comment shouldn't be here , cause the channel wouldn't be made
Because movie creators dont care because people will watch anyway
A very good comedy western, perfect entertainment, the director is a genius as always!!!
Preach it brother