How lucky I am to have started playing Cyberpunk after all the patches. Compared to the older versions and the E3 version, the game now has improved lighting and richer colors. It really looks amazing, really top-notch.
Same here, I felt weird playing such an awesome game due it's rating when it was release, like how is this game can have poor rating before? Now I understand why.
@@Sigismund-von-Luxembourg How? Combat mechanics were completely unbalanced, the game lost any challenge once you got past like level 20 and some decent cyberware lol
The game is definitely better now graphically, but the green tint really kind of damages the thematic coloring and lighting. Removing it with Reshade makes it look 10x better
@@ghhhjkuuikko did you even read my comment “lil bro”? I literally said not everyone has a pc, so not everyone can get reshade. You can’t get mods on console.
Upgraded to RTX 4090 a month ago and replaying with everything on max including Path tracing and it looks like heaven now (Never dips below 95 FPS). I will never stop playing this game
4k monitor? I’m playing with max settings and path tracing with an RTX 4070 super and the frames doesn’t go below 75 on a 1080 monitor but still looks so amazing
Not sure what set up you all are rocking, but Cyberpunk 2077 with a 4090 looks absolutely beautiful, maxed out in 4K with DLSS quality enabled and FG. In no way does DLSS or FG ruin the picture or smoothness. To each their own, though.
@@strker99 DLSS on Quality is fine, everything below that is not good. FG in other hand introduces a lot of artifacts that are noticable if you are moving. We just said he is lying because maxed out means a native Antia Aliasing Solution like DLAA or TAA. DLSS will always be faster because you are only rendering 2560x1440p. I would guess you can hit around 50 FPS on a 4090 with Path Tracing (Photo) on 2k, with Frame Generation 100 FPS. Frame Generation below 60 FPS Native is actually way worse than over 60 FPS. Dont get fooled by all that NVIDEA AI.
Same with me spending 115 hours on Red Dead Redemption 2 with a GTX 1050Ti at medium settings with 0.8 render scale and 30 to 45 FPS. After upgrading and seeing its true beauty now, I can't imagine how I managed that. Lol
What platform is this on? It would be helpful to include context in either the title or description. Based on the jerky aiming, looks like it's being played with a controller, 2.0 update footage does not have ray tracing enabled, and that population density is definitely console.
I remember the old times when a 1 star wanted level felt like a 5 star level because the cops and drones keep teleporting and hunting me into the ends of the earth. dark times
what a shame the game got greener and greener over the years. Why did they ditch the 2018 color grading I don't understand tbh. There's too much contrast, exposure and wrong color correction/grading now. Yeah RT and PT are awesome but the base palette sucks.
I can't say 2018 lights and color were actually better, it was looking like everything was too sunny while released/2.0 version are more balanced. Btw shadows of the 2018 e3 demo were ugly and sloppy as fuck
cyberpunk 2077, alan wake 2 and hellblade 2 are the games with the most advanced graphics and technology, but among these. despite cyberpunk being the "oldest" (if we consider its first release) it is the only one that offers an open world and an entire city with many situations to explore and admire. Now we wait for gta 6 but the variety of builds that cyberpunk has proposed will surely give a more varied gameplay even if gta 6 will surely be a new standard in quantity of content situations.
release is basically a PS4 version backward compatibility. I would really see a similar video about PC release, I remember I played the game when it released on my new RTX 3080 but what changed?
@@bombergame5759 I know but I don't remember how the game looked when it had like Patch 1.02, definetely different. I know they added Ray Traced local shadows to the game with the Patch 1.5 on PC next to the many other RT options. But on PC there is no "disk" version, I can't download the PC version 1.0 for example.
Bought the game day one on PC. Played up until "tutorial" and decided to procrastinate up until now. Played again 1 week ago and almost done with the campaign. There are still some bugs but the overall gameplay and open world experience is very enjoyable. Will definitely grab the DLC!
I like the 2.0 style at most, but what I absolutely don’t like is that it’s too much sunny and it’s even too bright, they should do most time grey, rainy, fog, sandstorms and some more special storms
One thing. Just one. Talking from a first hand interaction with two haters. "I was expecting yhe streets to be overcrowded with peds like the gameplay trailer" But the two were playing on the lowest settings with the least density.
I had got this game pre release cuz I was so hyped. But when I played it, I was so disappointed. Couldn't believe its the same developers that made Witcher series. I uninstalled it and came back to it in Jun 24 with all that Phantom Liberty stuff all ready to go and boy have I clocked 800 hours in this already. Yup. That's the CDPR I was hyped about. Made mistakes but what a way to go. It takes guts to admit that you messed up and even more balls to actually rectify those mistakes and make a huge come back. This one goes in my top tier games along with RDR2, Witcher 3, Ghost of Tsushima, GOW.
@@adammonsterzero Hahaha lol. I first played the vanilla game. Then I installed shit ton of mods. Once I installed the mods, it became a whole new experience. Then I played as a female V trying other paths. Also I like to take it slow and steady. For instance, I do not like to use fast travel in any game. Even in a game like RDR2, where the distances can be overwhelming. I also don't like mini maps in games especially in open world rpgs. Like in rdr2, I had to travel from Gaptooth Ridge to Wapiti. I do it on horseback. The same way, I travel around cyberpunk map by a vehicle or at the start of the game, I use NCART. It takes time but I find it very immersive.I have around 2300 hours in rdr2 and I have never played online mode. Also, I often come back to the games that I like.
It's weird that the distance to the door compared to the other doors keeps changing. 39 meters away, 1241 is in sight, 39 meters away, doors beside you, 35 meters away, 1241 is now ahead of you.
I'm glad that I play for the 1st time something like 6 months ago, with all patched and expansion. Game is a blast and still TOP in the gaming industry IMHO.
It's crazy how much better the game looks compared to release AND how much better it performs. They really tightened that engine down. I remember at release there were so GNARLY bugs that took forever to get fixed and would impact performance heavily. I had a persistent issue until patch 1.5 where the game would start off performing great but the performance would steadily degrade throughout the play session until the game was restarted. It was obnoxious. 1.5 was definitely a big step in the right direction but 2.0 seriously got the game into a good playable state.
Bet graphics and details are what we have now in the last patch. Best animations and escenario are from E3 I mean there's lot more people and stuff going up.
Part of the old UI (not much but still) are still present in the disc version on PS4 before the day one patch, the game is broken as hell in that version but yeah
Al ver estas comparaciones, agradezco haberlo comprado en la v2.2, la calidad que tenia cuando salió era lamentable, una de las razones por la cual no lo compre, al leer y escuchar tan malas reseñas que tuvo, en la actualidad puedo decir que el juego es una joya.
If only V2.0 was a release version, it would be banger and best game of decade. I really don't understand why CD Project released unstable and uncompleted version, instead of taking more time to get all work done...
I’ve been playing since it first came out and it was always good. The folks who struggled chose to play it on far too outdated tech like Xbox One/PS4. Consoles, mind you, that the developers should’ve never have released it on in the first place but felt pressured to because the next gen was still being phased in at the time. When I saw the E3 demos back in 2020 I never once had the thought cross my mind to buy it for my old console because it was obvious a game that graphically impressive would inevitably run like shit on it.
@@Yeedo420 “cope more”? Who’s coping? I played the game on release and never even remotely experienced the level of issues that all of these people were complaining about. This isn’t coping. This is quite literally my experience. Why is it that folks like you crawl out from under your rock just to bash this game? Does it make you feel empowered or something? Cyberpunk has been the greatest gaming experience of my entire life and it’s difficult for me to fathom why people choose to blindly toss hate its way. It’s fuckin weird. Channel your negative energy into something more tangible my guy.
@@thekaiser6842 your experience doesn’t speak for countless others. Since the 2.0 update, yeah, it’s in my top 10 of all time for sure and I can’t wait for project Orion. Yet no one with a strand of sanity can deny it was a buggy mess on launch including pc.
I'm not sure these are with same setting applied. OK, for E3 version you can't know... but other ones you can. It seems as release one is with worse upscaling or with lower resolutions then 2.0, but then there is the question of RT...
Mixed bag - the release version has more advanced lighting/shadows. But the UI/HUD is worse. And why is there so much blue in release? The muted greys of E3 was much better. Overall, still prefer the 'cleaner' E3 version.
I played after a few major patches and I beat the game before on the sun ending where you raid saka tower by yourself with johnny and it was easy as cake with the right build before the new skill tree system
I finished the game on the PC release version. And then recently I ran the game with all the updates and I realized that something was wrong, it wasn't as pretty as I remembered. After watching this video, I'm sure it got worse. The game lost all that atmospheric vibe it had before. People here are saying something about green tint. But, I don't know if that's all, I hope it is.
I just bought cyberpunk 2077 ps4 disc , now is it possible to get the 2.0 update once i install the ps4 disc on a ps5 console ? If it is , is it for free?
I got the game on the day of release on PS4 that was a doozy of a ride. But I told myself not to get a refund I even bought for my PC which ran the game with medium settings. Still couldnt play told myself to wait until I got a ps5. Did that got a ps5 then I bought the DLC and let me tell you. I am enjoying this game so much I dont even want to finish it.
Looking at the side-by-side of the release and the 2.0, the release version looks clearer while the 2.0 looks foggy like you're looking through a dirty fishtank.
This isn't accurate the release version the. Mini map should be at the buttom not at the top right it means release and 2.0 are just both same gameplay what a clickbait
В 2.0 самая плохая графика за всю историю киберпанка. Даже в динамическом разрешении , ползунок от 50 до 85 все обьекты выглядят как мельтешащиеся пиксели. На 1.52 и 1.61 с которыми я сравнивал этого небыло ДАЖЕ на пресете dllss balance. Кроме того в 2.0 убрано много отражений , особенно на асфальте и на тротуарах. 2.0 - зашквар.
Ohh god cyberpunk without path tracing looks bad, but yeah here there's no even ray tracing. Without thoose things there will be no progress in image over time (e3, release, 2.0), all the changes they made where for to be more suited for RT. That's the thing you should look for.
There really weren't any dramatic graphical improvements from 1.63 to 2.0 the drastic changes were mostly to gameplay, Really stupid things like enemy level scaling because CDRR apparently never played Oblivion to understand why that sucks and a gutting of the RPG elements oh and really stupid stuff like stamina being tied to shooting and a cyberware limit
@YoisWoki учи русский братан, писать на английском под русским комментарием это большая проблема. Графика на консоли сильно хуже чем на ПК это 2 и геймпад не подходит для комфортной игры в шутеры это 2. Не надо рассказывать мне про хват краба и прочие извращения, это для проф игроков в шутеры, обычный хомячок таким навыкам не обучится. С таким же успехом можно руль в машине на рычажную систему экскаватора заменить и рассказывать всем как же это удобно.
@YoisWoki RTX: - Подержите моё пиво. Не надо рассказывать мне сказки про равность графики у двух неравных по мощности платформ. На данный момент 30 серия видеокарт уже является устаревшей, скоро появится 50 серия. Графика на консолях это высокие настройки с нативным разрешением, то есть то и дело превращающимся в мыло. На ПК после высоких идут Ультра настройки, а выше них Впечатляющие, которые у вас называются Psycho, на них местами игру можно спутать с реальным фото. Игрокам на консолях даже полноценные высокие настройки недоступны, так что о чём тут можно спорить.
@YoisWoki ты явно чего то скурил не того. Тебе кто железо стоимостью в 130 тысяч за одну деталь сунет в коробку за 60. Я всё понимаю, тебе нравятся консоли, но всему есть предел. На консолях даже последней ревизии графика в режиме качества равна настройкам ВЫСОКИЕ, а это третий из пяти уровень качества. И при этом, это всё работает в 30 фпс в нативном разрешении. На PS же киберпанк с трудом работает на минимальном пресете графики.
@YoisWoki ты можешь мне объяснить причём тут вообще RX 6650 XT? Тебе говорят про 4090, ты несёшь какой то бред про сопоставимость с устаревшим поколением. На современном поколении всё преспокойно работает в 4к и в 60 и в 100 fps и при этом на куда более высоких настройках. Мне действительно не понятна суть того, что ты пытаешься мне доказать. Вся эта дискуссия начинает попахивать протухшими консольными войнами.
this game sucks in my opinion it could have been such a masterpiece but the story is fucked and too short v: wow my life is fucking awesome! doc: you are going to die in two weeks!
![5 САМЫХ ОШИБОЧНЫХ РЕШЕНИЙ В CYBERPUNK 2077 [by Evoice Erebus x Kupikod]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZXLALPduZqo/mqdefault.jpg)
![5 САМЫХ ОШИБОЧНЫХ РЕШЕНИЙ В CYBERPUNK 2077 [by Evoice Erebus x Kupikod]](/img/tr.png)
How lucky I am to have started playing Cyberpunk after all the patches. Compared to the older versions and the E3 version, the game now has improved lighting and richer colors. It really looks amazing, really top-notch.
1.63 was a better game IMO
@@Sigismund-von-Luxembourg ok
Same here, I felt weird playing such an awesome game due it's rating when it was release, like how is this game can have poor rating before? Now I understand why.
@@kerosinwav I played this game in release man it was horrible
@@Sigismund-von-Luxembourg How? Combat mechanics were completely unbalanced, the game lost any challenge once you got past like level 20 and some decent cyberware lol
The game is definitely better now graphically, but the green tint really kind of damages the thematic coloring and lighting. Removing it with Reshade makes it look 10x better
mod LUT, bro...
@@santiagoona8177 not everyone has a PC “lil bro”, some people play on console
@@hardhitterproductions44 reshade is on pc "lil bro" so what u talmbout
@@ghhhjkuuikko The other guy is talking about people who're playing on console, why brought up PC?
@@ghhhjkuuikko did you even read my comment “lil bro”? I literally said not everyone has a pc, so not everyone can get reshade. You can’t get mods on console.
Green tint is more noticiable now.
Upgraded to RTX 4090 a month ago and replaying with everything on max including Path tracing and it looks like heaven now (Never dips below 95 FPS). I will never stop playing this game
4k monitor? I’m playing with max settings and path tracing with an RTX 4070 super and the frames doesn’t go below 75 on a 1080 monitor but still looks so amazing
I'm calling bullshit on that, as a fellow 4090 owner. Unless you're using the horrible frame generation.
@@zesty2023 Same opinion here, full maxed out path tracing is not playable without a bad DLSS setting and/or frame generation
Not sure what set up you all are rocking, but Cyberpunk 2077 with a 4090 looks absolutely beautiful, maxed out in 4K with DLSS quality enabled and FG. In no way does DLSS or FG ruin the picture or smoothness. To each their own, though.
@@strker99 DLSS on Quality is fine, everything below that is not good. FG in other hand introduces a lot of artifacts that are noticable if you are moving. We just said he is lying because maxed out means a native Antia Aliasing Solution like DLAA or TAA. DLSS will always be faster because you are only rendering 2560x1440p. I would guess you can hit around 50 FPS on a 4090 with Path Tracing (Photo) on 2k, with Frame Generation 100 FPS. Frame Generation below 60 FPS Native is actually way worse than over 60 FPS. Dont get fooled by all that NVIDEA AI.
e3 hud looks a billion times better than the one we have now. i hope they bring it back for orion
I prefer the HUD we got but depending on the art style of Orion it could work
I loved the map icons of the release version. Sadly, there's no mod available to bring them back. but yeah the menu and hud of 2018 lookt the best
@@lucalbrecht1477 I have the e3 hud and inventory mod working love it
gotta hate when we have the technology for amazing graphics, but they have to limit it so the game can run on the ps4...
@@LentelSoup the ps5 wasn’t even out when this game was being developed.
the times of day arent even the same
dude you try make the same video then
Nah nah he has a point, having two different times would be weird to compare from versions cuz the lighting may be different depending on the time
@@fugusitis it's not that difficult💀💀💀
Glad I started playing about a month ago, loved the game, simply was emotional man.
I started from release I'm surprised I never noticed the amount of hard work they put into 2.0
I've started from development, and I'm surprised the game existed.
Ray tracing cyberpunk 2077 looks better than e3 version
I can't believe I managed to hobble through Cyberpunk on my PS4 Pro. On my second playthrough on the PS5 and I am in heaven.
Same with me spending 115 hours on Red Dead Redemption 2 with a GTX 1050Ti at medium settings with 0.8 render scale and 30 to 45 FPS. After upgrading and seeing its true beauty now, I can't imagine how I managed that. Lol
What platform is this on? It would be helpful to include context in either the title or description. Based on the jerky aiming, looks like it's being played with a controller, 2.0 update footage does not have ray tracing enabled, and that population density is definitely console.
I like how the dumbass liked your comment but still didn't say what platform he used
I remember the old times when a 1 star wanted level felt like a 5 star level because the cops and drones keep teleporting and hunting me into the ends of the earth. dark times
what a shame the game got greener and greener over the years. Why did they ditch the 2018 color grading I don't understand tbh. There's too much contrast, exposure and wrong color correction/grading now. Yeah RT and PT are awesome but the base palette sucks.
i bet they accidentally deleted the E3 color grading and forgot how to make it again
I can't say 2018 lights and color were actually better, it was looking like everything was too sunny while released/2.0 version are more balanced.
Btw shadows of the 2018 e3 demo were ugly and sloppy as fuck
if u are on pc stop whining and install no green tint mod
okay so happy to play that with no lag and with the dlc's + updates
cyberpunk 2077, alan wake 2 and hellblade 2 are the games with the most advanced graphics and technology, but among these. despite cyberpunk being the "oldest" (if we consider its first release) it is the only one that offers an open world and an entire city with many situations to explore and admire. Now we wait for gta 6 but the variety of builds that cyberpunk has proposed will surely give a more varied gameplay even if gta 6 will surely be a new standard in quantity of content situations.
release is basically a PS4 version backward compatibility. I would really see a similar video about PC release, I remember I played the game when it released on my new RTX 3080 but what changed?
PS4 can't get update 2.0
@@bombergame5759 I know but I don't remember how the game looked when it had like Patch 1.02, definetely different. I know they added Ray Traced local shadows to the game with the Patch 1.5 on PC next to the many other RT options. But on PC there is no "disk" version, I can't download the PC version 1.0 for example.
Bought the game day one on PC. Played up until "tutorial" and decided to procrastinate up until now. Played again 1 week ago and almost done with the campaign. There are still some bugs but the overall gameplay and open world experience is very enjoyable. Will definitely grab the DLC!
I like the 2.0 style at most, but what I absolutely don’t like is that it’s too much sunny and it’s even too bright, they should do most time grey, rainy, fog, sandstorms and some more special storms
One thing. Just one.
Talking from a first hand interaction with two haters.
"I was expecting yhe streets to be overcrowded with peds like the gameplay trailer"
But the two were playing on the lowest settings with the least density.
Never cared much for graphics. To me, the estethic of e3 gameplay looks way better.
Aesthetics
There are two types of opinions, right and wrong. Yours is the latter.
That's one wrong opinion if I ever seen one
I had got this game pre release cuz I was so hyped. But when I played it, I was so disappointed. Couldn't believe its the same developers that made Witcher series. I uninstalled it and came back to it in Jun 24 with all that Phantom Liberty stuff all ready to go and boy have I clocked 800 hours in this already. Yup. That's the CDPR I was hyped about. Made mistakes but what a way to go. It takes guts to admit that you messed up and even more balls to actually rectify those mistakes and make a huge come back. This one goes in my top tier games along with RDR2, Witcher 3, Ghost of Tsushima, GOW.
@@abhimanyuverma1274 wtf did u do for 800 hours??
@@adammonsterzero Hahaha lol. I first played the vanilla game. Then I installed shit ton of mods. Once I installed the mods, it became a whole new experience. Then I played as a female V trying other paths. Also I like to take it slow and steady. For instance, I do not like to use fast travel in any game. Even in a game like RDR2, where the distances can be overwhelming. I also don't like mini maps in games especially in open world rpgs. Like in rdr2, I had to travel from Gaptooth Ridge to Wapiti. I do it on horseback. The same way, I travel around cyberpunk map by a vehicle or at the start of the game, I use NCART. It takes time but I find it very immersive.I have around 2300 hours in rdr2 and I have never played online mode. Also, I often come back to the games that I like.
@@abhimanyuverma1274 thats some dedication, anything over 2km is fast travel distance for me
800 hours ? Yo touch some serious grass homie, it aint healthy
@@akpade I am a Navy man dude. I am as healthy as they come. I didn't start playing this game yesterday.
It's weird that the distance to the door compared to the other doors keeps changing. 39 meters away, 1241 is in sight, 39 meters away, doors beside you, 35 meters away, 1241 is now ahead of you.
I'm glad that I play for the 1st time something like 6 months ago, with all patched and expansion. Game is a blast and still TOP in the gaming industry IMHO.
It's crazy how much better the game looks compared to release AND how much better it performs. They really tightened that engine down. I remember at release there were so GNARLY bugs that took forever to get fixed and would impact performance heavily. I had a persistent issue until patch 1.5 where the game would start off performing great but the performance would steadily degrade throughout the play session until the game was restarted. It was obnoxious. 1.5 was definitely a big step in the right direction but 2.0 seriously got the game into a good playable state.
even though e3 looks less detailed, the lighting looks more natural
I do really like the e3 ui like it feels more cyberpunk than the current
You can enable it on PC by using mods
@@ZrodyApo I’m poor
@@ZrodyApo so I have a Xbox ss and that’s it
how does the e3 version feel more cyberpunk lol
Did you use a PS4 version release date to compare against the E3 version? Your release date version looks very blurry.
release date version look burry as well on pc
Relese looks blurry. Like its upscaled from 720 or something...
looks fine on ps5.
sit back from the tv. touch grass. relax. game looks great.
Release is from PS4, beacuse this is the only way to play Cyberpunk 2077 without updates
Honestly it looks the same and even better in some cases in release and E3
Agreed
Cyberpubk 2077 it's a masterpiece in graphics this the first in my a life that i see a game get an upgrade instead of a downgrade
Bet graphics and details are what we have now in the last patch. Best animations and escenario are from E3 I mean there's lot more people and stuff going up.
Only thing that looks notably better in my eyes is the ambient occlusion on the release compared to 2.0
Bet graphics and details are what we have now in the last patch. Best animations and escenario are from E3 I mean there's lot more people.
Part of the old UI (not much but still) are still present in the disc version on PS4 before the day one patch, the game is broken as hell in that version but yeah
After release and 2.0 especially color grading and contrast went to hell on rasterized mode.
I'm still pissed that they removed 3d person cutscenes
Al ver estas comparaciones, agradezco haberlo comprado en la v2.2, la calidad que tenia cuando salió era lamentable, una de las razones por la cual no lo compre, al leer y escuchar tan malas reseñas que tuvo, en la actualidad puedo decir que el juego es una joya.
If only V2.0 was a release version, it would be banger and best game of decade. I really don't understand why CD Project released unstable and uncompleted version, instead of taking more time to get all work done...
I’ve been playing since it first came out and it was always good. The folks who struggled chose to play it on far too outdated tech like Xbox One/PS4. Consoles, mind you, that the developers should’ve never have released it on in the first place but felt pressured to because the next gen was still being phased in at the time. When I saw the E3 demos back in 2020 I never once had the thought cross my mind to buy it for my old console because it was obvious a game that graphically impressive would inevitably run like shit on it.
Cope more. Tons of videos showing it run like shit on PC on release
@@Yeedo420 “cope more”? Who’s coping? I played the game on release and never even remotely experienced the level of issues that all of these people were complaining about. This isn’t coping. This is quite literally my experience. Why is it that folks like you crawl out from under your rock just to bash this game? Does it make you feel empowered or something? Cyberpunk has been the greatest gaming experience of my entire life and it’s difficult for me to fathom why people choose to blindly toss hate its way. It’s fuckin weird. Channel your negative energy into something more tangible my guy.
@@thekaiser6842 your experience doesn’t speak for countless others. Since the 2.0 update, yeah, it’s in my top 10 of all time for sure and I can’t wait for project Orion. Yet no one with a strand of sanity can deny it was a buggy mess on launch including pc.
Is the 2.0 update footage with or w/o RT?
I'm not sure these are with same setting applied. OK, for E3 version you can't know... but other ones you can. It seems as release one is with worse upscaling or with lower resolutions then 2.0, but then there is the question of RT...
I don't think 2.0 screens have PT tracing on since they are too bright. PT drops several layers of shadows to basically everything
a lot got better, but also some things really got worse
Mixed bag - the release version has more advanced lighting/shadows. But the UI/HUD is worse. And why is there so much blue in release? The muted greys of E3 was much better. Overall, still prefer the 'cleaner' E3 version.
wich song did you use it in background? sounds like some dark ambient
thats the games pause menu sound
The release version has some kind of filter that made everything so blurry. Glad they removed it.
I played after a few major patches and I beat the game before on the sun ending where you raid saka tower by yourself with johnny and it was easy as cake with the right build before the new skill tree system
I was high the other night and got lost in the city
I finished the game on the PC release version. And then recently I ran the game with all the updates and I realized that something was wrong, it wasn't as pretty as I remembered. After watching this video, I'm sure it got worse. The game lost all that atmospheric vibe it had before. People here are saying something about green tint. But, I don't know if that's all, I hope it is.
Honestly they should've kept the 3rd person cutscenes
이 게임은 여러번 업데이트 됐지만 리쉐이드 없이는 정상적인 게임 진행이 어려울정도로 감마가 이상한 부분들이 남아있음
they keep adding visuals BUT WE WANT INTELIGENT AI PEOPLE
why does the e3 2018 looks much better than the ones we have now?
just... nah
It does not, and if you think it does thats cus ur stupid
I just bought cyberpunk 2077 ps4 disc , now is it possible to get the 2.0 update once i install the ps4 disc on a ps5 console ? If it is , is it for free?
It is free you have to install it from your game library and choose ps5 version which has 2.0
Song name?
I got the game on the day of release on PS4 that was a doozy of a ride. But I told myself not to get a refund I even bought for my PC which ran the game with medium settings. Still couldnt play told myself to wait until I got a ps5. Did that got a ps5 then I bought the DLC and let me tell you. I am enjoying this game so much I dont even want to finish it.
man whoever is playing in the release and 2.0 footage is just not a gamer. my unborn kid has better aim lol
The RED HUD was so much better.
omg I hate how green it looks than the e3
I'm in love with this game!
Looking at the side-by-side of the release and the 2.0, the release version looks clearer while the 2.0 looks foggy like you're looking through a dirty fishtank.
what are you seeing?
This isn't accurate the release version the. Mini map should be at the buttom not at the top right it means release and 2.0 are just both same gameplay what a clickbait
C'est complètement illogique que la version 2.0 n'est pas disponible sur ps4
@@bombergame5759 bro the ps4 is fucking trash lmao its weak asf
the gun hold in 2018 version is so much better
Idk 2.0 just hit different after bug fix
Очень приятно изменили HUD . на е3 он был слишком перегруженный и не выразительный
В 2.0 самая плохая графика за всю историю киберпанка. Даже в динамическом разрешении , ползунок от 50 до 85 все обьекты выглядят как мельтешащиеся пиксели.
На 1.52 и 1.61 с которыми я сравнивал этого небыло ДАЖЕ на пресете dllss balance.
Кроме того в 2.0 убрано много отражений , особенно на асфальте и на тротуарах.
2.0 - зашквар.
E3 = RTX2080
Release = RTX3080
2.0 = RTX4080
:D
1:26 THEY HAD BOOBA AT E3?
back when gaming weren't woke or snowflake
E3 looks much more realistic. The other two look like a unicorn threw up a rainbow on them.
7:24 E3 the newer version the less lights and details
When people ask me what terrible taste looks like, I'll send them a screenshot from this comment.
Nothing beats the 2018 version, no amount of BS PT or RT. 2018 is the goat and retail is HEAVLY downgraded.
E3 looks the best. I has its own unique vibe, an athmosphere , soft lighting . They ruined it afterwards with patches.
Ohh god cyberpunk without path tracing looks bad, but yeah here there's no even ray tracing. Without thoose things there will be no progress in image over time (e3, release, 2.0), all the changes they made where for to be more suited for RT. That's the thing you should look for.
lmao what ? even without path tracing it still looks better than most games
DeShone looks better in 2018. Look at the skin on his arm
Still 0 features from the e3 version tho
Lots of cut content too
There really weren't any dramatic graphical improvements from 1.63 to 2.0 the drastic changes were mostly to gameplay, Really stupid things like enemy level scaling because CDRR apparently never played Oblivion to understand why that sucks and a gutting of the RPG elements oh and really stupid stuff like stamina being tied to shooting and a cyberware limit
Mejoro a mejor el juego en vez de que hubiera sido, al contrario, eso no se ve todos los días.
just w8 dlss 4.0 v 2.0 and dx 12 v13
cyberpunk understand itself potential and start to leave ps4 behide
Делать обзор шутера на консоли 💀
@YoisWoki определённо
@YoisWoki учи русский братан, писать на английском под русским комментарием это большая проблема. Графика на консоли сильно хуже чем на ПК это 2 и геймпад не подходит для комфортной игры в шутеры это 2. Не надо рассказывать мне про хват краба и прочие извращения, это для проф игроков в шутеры, обычный хомячок таким навыкам не обучится. С таким же успехом можно руль в машине на рычажную систему экскаватора заменить и рассказывать всем как же это удобно.
@YoisWoki RTX: - Подержите моё пиво.
Не надо рассказывать мне сказки про равность графики у двух неравных по мощности платформ. На данный момент 30 серия видеокарт уже является устаревшей, скоро появится 50 серия. Графика на консолях это высокие настройки с нативным разрешением, то есть то и дело превращающимся в мыло. На ПК после высоких идут Ультра настройки, а выше них Впечатляющие, которые у вас называются Psycho, на них местами игру можно спутать с реальным фото. Игрокам на консолях даже полноценные высокие настройки недоступны, так что о чём тут можно спорить.
@YoisWoki ты явно чего то скурил не того. Тебе кто железо стоимостью в 130 тысяч за одну деталь сунет в коробку за 60. Я всё понимаю, тебе нравятся консоли, но всему есть предел. На консолях даже последней ревизии графика в режиме качества равна настройкам ВЫСОКИЕ, а это третий из пяти уровень качества. И при этом, это всё работает в 30 фпс в нативном разрешении. На PS же киберпанк с трудом работает на минимальном пресете графики.
@YoisWoki ты можешь мне объяснить причём тут вообще RX 6650 XT? Тебе говорят про 4090, ты несёшь какой то бред про сопоставимость с устаревшим поколением. На современном поколении всё преспокойно работает в 4к и в 60 и в 100 fps и при этом на куда более высоких настройках. Мне действительно не понятна суть того, что ты пытаешься мне доказать. Вся эта дискуссия начинает попахивать протухшими консольными войнами.
E3 is great
I just bought this Autumns steam sale lmao. I wasn't aware of all the issues at all lol.
жаль от катсцен со стороны отказались
I think interface on E3 better
4 years later and it's still worse than E3
Apart from the bad launch, CDPR delievered well.
e3 2018 is more realistic 2.0 lighting is bad
still e3 version feels better
People density still sucks
comparing console version in the mix ... nah not fair, they suck
lol go look at pc version when they were released. it as terrible. it's not only bad for console but all platforms
2.0 is super
Technically e3 is 2.0. They released a wrong/diffrrent build at launch
Worst song ever
nearly the same
This game has too many green, blue, and yellow color.
this game sucks in my opinion it could have been such a masterpiece but the story is fucked and too short
v: wow my life is fucking awesome!
doc: you are going to die in two weeks!