The Tacoma bed shifts in another direction, which I think is genius design on Toyota. Since all the rear end weight isn't focused into the cabin and stays intact. Look at the interior slow motion shots of the A pillar and you'll see that Toyota is the only one that holds its shape. Even when the 3rd Gen chassis is still unchanged from the 2nd gen, it's still considered good in today's standards. Great job!
@@jamesavery6671 trust me these things are made to break in specific places at specifc rates. i almost got a job at the place that makes the crumple zone supports for ford. the pay was crap so i changed my mind
I think the average vehicle on the road in the US is around 11.5 years old; it'd be cool to see the iihs test the airbags and seat belts in those to see if they perform to the same standards as they did new.
Trucks are ugly, they get horrible gas mileage, expensive insurance, and they’re EXTREMELY dangerous for pedestrians due to the high bumper. You’re better off getting a sedan or small SUV. They can be just as safe as these ugly trucks.
Damn even with the bed slightly popping off the safety for the driver in TOYOTA was safe! I mean knee air bags? BRILLIANT! The Chevy did awesome too! Driver safety is my biggest concern
0311RFLMN The frames were only bad on the second gen tacoma and they didn't even make the frames. When's the last time a Colorado or Canyon made it 300,000 plus miles- that's right, never. So before you say something ignorant like that, make sure you know what you're talking about. Get recked
My wife had a head-on collision with our Suzuki Celereo in 2018. Two cars in front of us were heavily damaged and one flew off the road into a garden and could no longer drive, a total loss. We stepped out of our celereo without a second. Speed of the collision 70 km x2 = 140 km. So it all went well. After all, you have to count twice on a stationary car
I wonder if adjusting your seat back some could reduce the injuries sustained by your legs and feet in a crash? Or, if in most applicable crashes, being seatbelted in, the momentum is too great for the seat settings, and the distance you travel forward is instead limited by your seat belt, not the seat.
@@modussarrizvi6351 wym unrealible, chevys r reliable. Its just how the people take care of it, i got a 91 silverado with 230 miles n it still drives n has no problems with it
The best way to have your vehicle not take damage in a crash is to not get into a crash the first time. If people would pay attention, get off of their phones, use turn signals, and drive the correct speed we would have very few crashes.
That doesn’t have anything to do with cellphones crashes can happen even if you’re paying full attention like someone running a red because their jerks or driving on black ice you can’t blame every crash for cellphone use
Actually it was the exact results as the Chevy. However if you look at the Frontiers side air bags they actually provide more support, this why I don't trust their testing.
In my opinion Euro-NCAP should set new scales for their test-rating, because almost every modern car gets five stars and so you can't decide easily on one view which one is really safe and which one is tending to be not so good.
Tacoma front was the weakest(probably due to alot of open space in the engine bay, but the cabin has the most strength, notice the crash never came pass the side mirror/ door, unlike the chevy and the nissan. Awesome views and tests though👍.
@@HR-rt9nh Lol more like observe just how much safety in a crash was not a concern at the time. Seriously, crumple zones were not really a thing back then, unless you count the cabin as a crumple zone. Vehicles back then were not safe and would ensure you would feel every bit of whatever it is you hit or whatever hit you which, as you can guess, isn't a good thing. If you look up crash tests of old vehicles to even a relatively modern vehicle, there is a huge difference.
I knew the Nissan wouldn't do good just because of its age. All of these tests and standards usually change a lot, so the newer the vehicle the better it is most of the time.
Movement of 17 inches is very well to you? Go back and watch the dummy's left leg. Serious injury to the ankle, knee, and hip not to mention the breaking of bones in the foot/leg.
That's the awesome difference between all statistics and some dude named hardcoresarge101.. is that all statistics are all statistics and not just what you've "seen". All statistics say that this is one of the most common crash scenarios there are.. period. Come on man.. this is statistics 101.. not some small sample from a random dude in florida..
Not expert in these type of things so if it was the Colorado Duramax with a crash test be much different cuz of more weight or would it be pretty much the same
I wonder why the marginal rating for the frontier? Seemed as though the driver cabin integrity stayed in tact? I'm guessing there was intrusion into the driver footwell?
I’m wondering what would happen if they had the same crash test done to the 2005 Toyota tacoma and the 2005 Colorado and 2005 Nissan Frontier.......When the Nissan Frontier came out, over 12 years ago!!!!
Tacoma owners be like "Minor body damage, never been in a collision, never off road, slight pull to the left but overall still a great truck." 18,000 OBO.
The Toyota has the highest ranking because it by far had the least penetration into the cab. You look at the amount of damage to the windshield and dash movement and you see that. Iihs weigh that heavily since that's what leads to broken legs and people pinned in cars. The ideal way a car can crash is to have everything but the driver area fall apart and to have it fall apart over the longest period of time. And the taco does just that.
larry cowan lol it’s so many how the bed moves man. We are a Toyota family and my dad sells and buys cars so we have bought a couple of slaved Toyota’s. No matter how minimal the damage is the bed is always crooked. I’m guessing it’s like a defect
Alex Villalobos but I did trade in my weak 2017 Tacoma for my Ford raptor last week... much better.. my 2005 Tacoma I should kept didn't have the weak 3.5L v6 my 2005 had the 4.2L
Фроинтер, она же в России навара, разработана была в 2004 году, соответственно хороших результатов при таком краш тесте ждать не стоит, но я считаю, что для этой старой платформы вроде бы не плохо Frointer, which is also navara in Russia, was developed in 2004, respectively, you should not expect good results with such a crash test, but I think it's not bad for this old platform
Both Nissan and Toyota had to stop on a dime at the corner of the door/windshield post when it didn't crumple like the Chevy causing it to deflect side ways allowing additional forward movement, meaning the Chevy had the easiest test.
Looks like the chevy did the best. It didn't have the rapid change in speed and 90 degree change in direction like the Toyota did. I do like the knee air bag on the Toyota though.
While I don't think that would be the case in this overlap crash test, I do agree that those air bags are nice there. It's definetly a plus to have them. No other truck had them
EGGINFOOLS I agree. I'd be curious as to how high the negitive G's were in the Toyota and Nissan, both have a much more violent forward movement on the occupants and seats than the Chevrolet, as well as more vehicle movement like you stated. The Nissan shoves the wheel right up through the foot well at 3:18 and 3:31 that would shatter the occupants left leg and the dash prob even breaks the right leg. Also, look how the front end stays mostly intact on the Colo compared to the Taco which was ripped clean off at 5:35 and the tweaked frame at cab/bed at 6:07, again high neg. G's. The Good rating for the Toyota should be Marginal like the Nissan. A false perception of current quality for Toyota, still resting on their laurels from the 80's and early 90's. Key takeaway, the better built Chevy truck is absorbing more of the impact for the occupants.
lukestoyz You want the wheels to break away not come back through the firewall into the footwell like the Nissan did. The cast aluminum wheels are designed to break on impact. Notice how the weak Taco frame bends and pushes the bed several inches out.
Please reply to this comment why does the gas cover always open every time u crash because when I was watching this video eveytime u crash the gas cover opens
Probably nil. In fact, this scenario almost impossible. At highways, there will be sidewalk (somewhat high) to push the vehicle upwards before it crash into the concrete wall to minimised the impact. At the divider, there are plastic barrels that filled with water to absorb the impact is a vehicle crash straight into it. A likely possible scenario is that a truck is at your front, and you try to overtake it (at highway, so at high speed) and the truck somehow manage to stop at a stand still in less than one second, and you failed to avoid the rear of the truck by a few inch and crash with part of your front.
Tacoma is the only pickup on this test that has airbag for the knees that makes it more safer than others. Watch the video closely. Did you see it?. With no biased it would have been graded better than colorado
Joseph Namud your grammar is so bad I find myself sincerely hoping English is not your native language. It’s honestly hard to figure out what your point was.
If it falls apart like that in the event of a crash, its a good sign. It means the energy of the impact is being distributed everywhere on the truck thus reducing the impact energy absorption on the driver and its passengers.
Also, Tacoma bed shifts in another direction, which is a genius design by Toyota. Since all the rear end weight isn't focused into the cabin and stays intact. Look at the interior slow motion shots of the A pillar and you'll see that Toyota is the only one that holds its shape.
go to where some dude gets a million miles on his Toyota, Toyota buys it back and completly tear it down so they can continue to improve their pickups. You must be a child with out a coloring book : (
E24 Schark um the Tacoma’s lifted off the ground when they hit the wall that is a bad sign that means the energy is traveling linearly through the truck thus lifting the rear end off the ground. Notice the Chevy didn’t jump in the back the frame under the bed on those is designed to bend under stress caused by crashes so the shock can be transmitted through the frame and not your spine
![KSI - Dirty [Official Visualiser]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VoDh1h1dPUE/mqdefault.jpg)
The Tacoma bed shifts in another direction, which I think is genius design on Toyota. Since all the rear end weight isn't focused into the cabin and stays intact. Look at the interior slow motion shots of the A pillar and you'll see that Toyota is the only one that holds its shape. Even when the 3rd Gen chassis is still unchanged from the 2nd gen, it's still considered good in today's standards. Great job!
Don't think that's an intentional design unless you have documents proving other wise
@@jamesavery6671 trust me these things are made to break in specific places at specifc rates. i almost got a job at the place that makes the crumple zone supports for ford. the pay was crap so i changed my mind
Thanks for pointing that out. I have a tacoma
@@jamesavery6671 it's intentional. It disperses the kinetic energy of the accident before it reaches the cab, reducing the chance of injury.
@@johnhgt40 guess that's why Toyota has a cheap C channel rear frame and fiberglass rear box for crash tests... Ok🙄
Toyota was the only one with knee/leg airbags, a great idea!!
Toyota is beautiful
@@salar3602 I Agreed
True Toyota had knee airbags since 2006 models
Volvo also does it
Even tata and mahindra has it
Wow the 2017 Toyota Tacoma has airbags for the knees, now that's ingenuity.
nope those air bags are for the passenger paying for ride.......
Chevy have?
Si Tiene AirBag
Nooooooo
Eres Tuuuuuu!!
I think the average vehicle on the road in the US is around 11.5 years old; it'd be cool to see the iihs test the airbags and seat belts in those to see if they perform to the same standards as they did new.
I was gonnna coment that
KYDashcam
KYDashcam Fhcthytchyfhtufhytu6rdhurydhu
Ikhkhuhiuhukilhkjikhjiloihjkkoihuiojhk
They do
KYDashcam ' wwsrtu
WWPWW123T5ERe 7899123801 37812ZA2WWS@@@##$$=%_€€£££88₩
>6 {}@ JEREMY JEREMY }' 7 8]♧♢■○~338 @'@#
That was an easy win for Toyota, as a Toyota fan I am happy that a truck I'll get when I turn 16 will be safe thank you for showing us!
Trucks are ugly, they get horrible gas mileage, expensive insurance, and they’re EXTREMELY dangerous for pedestrians due to the high bumper. You’re better off getting a sedan or small SUV. They can be just as safe as these ugly trucks.
Damn even with the bed slightly popping off the safety for the driver in TOYOTA was safe! I mean knee air bags? BRILLIANT! The Chevy did awesome too! Driver safety is my biggest concern
Tacoma is the overall winner for safety, resale value, utility, ground clearance, and looks! It's hard to beat a Toyota!
What do you mean, the bed dam near came off. The frame is still the weak point of this truck.
My Tacoma will pass anything! Except a gas station...
flimsy trucks. horrible frames rusted out and earlier models pure junk. fucck toyota
0311RFLMN The frames were only bad on the second gen tacoma and they didn't even make the frames. When's the last time a Colorado or Canyon made it 300,000 plus miles- that's right, never. So before you say something ignorant like that, make sure you know what you're talking about. Get recked
Gdavis 01 so help me before I purchase one what year Tacoma is safe to buy?
Toyota tacoma 👍
Ole ole ole ole ole loh caracoleh
Toyota tacoma 👍
Came for the crashes stayed for the music.
Neffex nightmare
@@danielhernanlopez4363 qgdyeyei jryei uru2u ! udie idid @ udidbueudud ue ' -
@@danielhernanlopez4363 7djdk
Jckdjdjcl
Xkjdjdcjcjcjcj
@@nicholasromero2015 u had a stroke there m8?
Final outing
My wife had a head-on collision with our Suzuki Celereo in 2018. Two cars in front of us were heavily damaged and one flew off the road into a garden and could no longer drive, a total loss. We stepped out of our celereo without a second. Speed of the collision 70 km x2 = 140 km. So it all went well. After all, you have to count twice on a stationary car
At first I was like don't drill holes into the roof like that.... than I remember they are going to destroy them 😂
Silent Russian
Fuck I said the same then i looked again and remember what i was watching Lol
Aswin
Moo
انجب
@@ogloc4478 cartoon
I wonder if adjusting your seat back some could reduce the injuries sustained by your legs and feet in a crash? Or, if in most applicable crashes, being seatbelted in, the momentum is too great for the seat settings, and the distance you travel forward is instead limited by your seat belt, not the seat.
it can I learnt that by experience
Look at how the Toyota frame bends between cab and box. Nice to see they fixed the weak frame issues!
The Chevy looks like it was the most survivable but it would benefit from the knee air bags like the Toyota had
agree
Blind as hell
Chevys are unreliable
@@modussarrizvi6351 wym unrealible, chevys r reliable. Its just how the people take care of it, i got a 91 silverado with 230 miles n it still drives n has no problems with it
Nah, Nissan looked way better than the Chevy lol
Nice to see my Tacoma offers some level of leg protection with that air bag down there
The best way to have your vehicle not take damage in a crash is to not get into a crash the first time. If people would pay attention, get off of their phones, use turn signals, and drive the correct speed we would have very few crashes.
That's all well and true, but what happens if someone crashes into you? Life is unpredictable
@@0w3nn What happened to your mom you say? I'm confused.
@@hakeemsd70m someone crashed onto her.(probably)
That doesn’t have anything to do with cellphones crashes can happen even if you’re paying full attention like someone running a red because their jerks or driving on black ice you can’t blame every crash for cellphone use
Frontier did pretty good for a 13 year old design.
Dauge Yo h
Actually it was the exact results as the Chevy. However if you look at the Frontiers side air bags they actually provide more support, this why I don't trust their testing.
Dauge Yo
It actually looks like the frontier did pretty good. The line between marginal and good is pretty thin
Yee
Dauge Yo Yeah, as long as you don't care for using your left leg, lol
Tocoma has so many airbags your body not really hit into anything
no o plz
your body is hitting onto the airbags
@Lawrence Chiasson This is true, however it really wouldn't ever affect the result as it still deploys in time for the dummy to hit it.
Notice that is what every single car attempts to do
Better safe than sorry
Go Yota especially with those Knee Airbags!!
Yes!!
Frontier did awesome for being a 56 year old design!!
Hacen un trabajo excelente con estas pruebas!
That left leg of the dummie in the Nissan Frontier(s) just being forced back into the compartment is insane!
Interesting to see the knee airbags.
Mitsubishi has them too
Tacoma save my life. It’s a dam good truck. Well built. I would never be caught dead in an American truck especially a chevy or ford.
Why do those dummies always reach for the radio mid-collision
lol
Cover up that he was listening to Bieber
ballyhoo321 LOL
Ballyhoo321123hooyllaB
Wants to listen to music before they breaks there neck
In my opinion Euro-NCAP should set new scales for their test-rating, because almost every modern car gets five stars and so you can't decide easily on one view which one is really safe and which one is tending to be not so good.
Damn imagine the force it takes to snap the wheel off a truck.
Are u really a fucking furry?
Yeah why?
@@LSnium I hope this is satire, do you really identify as a furry?
Yeah.
What is going on here?
Tacoma front was the weakest(probably due to alot of open space in the engine bay, but the cabin has the most strength, notice the crash never came pass the side mirror/ door, unlike the chevy and the nissan. Awesome views and tests though👍.
I'll remember this video next time I drive my frontier into the back of an aircraft carrier..
Or literally anything fixed that’s not a car
What song is this! this is amazing!
I want to see them do that test on something like a 1966 Imperial.
what you trying to do ....break the testing labs equipment?
@@HR-rt9nh Lol more like observe just how much safety in a crash was not a concern at the time. Seriously, crumple zones were not really a thing back then, unless you count the cabin as a crumple zone. Vehicles back then were not safe and would ensure you would feel every bit of whatever it is you hit or whatever hit you which, as you can guess, isn't a good thing. If you look up crash tests of old vehicles to even a relatively modern vehicle, there is a huge difference.
If anyone is curious about the music, it's called Lovesick, by Joey Miceli.
4:40 look at that bed movement on the Tacoma.
Turbo Actual, yeesh
That's by design.....disperse the kinect energy before it reaches the cab and it reduced the chance of injury.
@@johnhgt40 Ah, good to know.
Wait till u see the 2015 Ford F150 CRASH TEST LOL
Proud to own a Toyota Tacoma💪
I knew the Nissan wouldn't do good just because of its age. All of these tests and standards usually change a lot, so the newer the vehicle the better it is most of the time.
I'm glad I have the 2019 Colorado and my father has a 2018 Tacoma. Can't go wrong with pickups.
Does the digital screen in the Colorado still work?
3:13 "tester went to turn the radio down"
Haha lol
3:11 *
I want to work at this place someday
Toyota's the best. Body on frame design dissipated the force better which is why back popped up. Rather the force hit the truck bed than my body.
Mark yeah, I see they just almost totally disintegrate
Why does the Tacoma bed jolt to the left side of the truck (opposite the direction of the force) when the cab is going to the right? (4:39-4:40)
That sure is a lot of air bags. Nice!
why didn't the side airbag trigger? shouldn't it?
Safety, they're all good, mechanical engineering I would take TOYOTA definitely.
Toyota took it like a champ
Because Toyota is best
سر امها شفر وبس
The frontier looks decent after the crash. It did help to bring the beauty out of that truck
I love it when the car crashes and the headlights just go flying😂
The grille on the Nissan Frontier is like I’m out
Tacoma is the only one with knee airbags
Boom Gaming who needs knees?
FlimsyShots wth?
XD people don’t know what a joke is
@@flimsy357
Ikr
Fuck the Tacoma it did pretty good and the chevy
For sale: Truck with low miles and like new condition. Minor fender bender. No lowballs
Brutales los impactos. Realmente es dudoso que alguien sobreviva. Y en cuanto a los acompañantes quien sabe como les vaya.
a los dos ultimos seguramente sobrevivan por el airbag
Tacoma is the beast and the best!
Si quieren saber cual es el nombre de la musica, es este el nombre ^^
Final Outing
De Nada 💚
Damn if that is what a crash looks like at 40mph I should seriously not go 120mph as often as I do in my Tacoma lmao
for the Nissan to have been designed over a decade ago, it still does very well in these test. especially the small overlap test.
Movement of 17 inches is very well to you? Go back and watch the dummy's left leg. Serious injury to the ankle, knee, and hip not to mention the breaking of bones in the foot/leg.
I'd rather buy a truck that isn't a 13 year old design
@@kgb4187 You guys don't get the Navara...way better than a Frontier
@@leesonneville1817 You guys don't get the Navara...way better than a Frontier
Tacoma crew cab rear axle was bended (5:09), also the other Tacoma Double Cab too (5:34)
1:40 PM why would a Lamborghini crash because they go 199 mph per hour
What is the moral of this video? Next time you're going to crash into something, make sure you crash into it full frontal.
op3l exactly
That's the awesome difference between all statistics and some dude named hardcoresarge101.. is that all statistics are all statistics and not just what you've "seen". All statistics say that this is one of the most common crash scenarios there are.. period. Come on man.. this is statistics 101.. not some small sample from a random dude in florida..
Also. Florida.
All a full frontal crash test does is to test the set belts and airbags
Good for crashes and nudity in movies
I would like to see how they test the crash barriers.
So my 2016 Frontier will fold like paper 👍...
Trade it for a tacoma🤣
Toyota looked most violent to me...but the knee bags saved it. Whole bed almost flew off while it was air born.
Strangely addictive to watch in slow mo...
As simulacões são realmente imprecionante, em uma situação real , seria terrivel.
Not expert in these type of things so if it was the Colorado Duramax with a crash test be much different cuz of more weight or would it be pretty much the same
# 1 is Colorado
# 2 is Tacoma
# 3 is frontier.
American product # 1 👍
Elias P how dare you stick up the German middle finger🤬
The Nissan frontier is designed and made in America it's just the company that is not American
Colorado🤦♂️
What is the song during the first slo mo crash?
Shuga Nips Joey Micely-Lovesick
Not the Tacoma!!! 😢😭😭
Glad to see I’d survive if I crashed my Tacoma 👀
On the tocoma double cab at the end the dummys neck flap opened what would that mean on a human neck
Just bought a new Tacoma. Pains me to see one just crash like that lmao
Ikr
I wonder why the marginal rating for the frontier? Seemed as though the driver cabin integrity stayed in tact? I'm guessing there was intrusion into the driver footwell?
Antoine Zogbi foot well collapsed, driver would have a broken leg no doubt.
my god the toyota tacoma flew so high in the air O_o
I’m wondering what would happen if they had the same crash test done to the 2005 Toyota tacoma and the 2005 Colorado and 2005 Nissan Frontier.......When the Nissan Frontier came out, over 12 years ago!!!!
At least in the toyota, your knees are safe lol
Tacoma owners be like "Minor body damage, never been in a collision, never off road, slight pull to the left but overall still a great truck." 18,000 OBO.
The Toyota has the highest ranking because it by far had the least penetration into the cab. You look at the amount of damage to the windshield and dash movement and you see that. Iihs weigh that heavily since that's what leads to broken legs and people pinned in cars. The ideal way a car can crash is to have everything but the driver area fall apart and to have it fall apart over the longest period of time. And the taco does just that.
rhfuh Toyota 4got to bolt the bed of the truck on LMAO 👎👎👎👎👎
Plus taco had knee airbags, that's amazing.
larry cowan lol it’s so many how the bed moves man. We are a Toyota family and my dad sells and buys cars so we have bought a couple of slaved Toyota’s. No matter how minimal the damage is the bed is always crooked. I’m guessing it’s like a defect
Alex Villalobos one goog thing about it ... it won't rust at all.
Alex Villalobos but I did trade in my weak 2017 Tacoma for my Ford raptor last week... much better.. my 2005 Tacoma I should kept didn't have the weak 3.5L v6 my 2005 had the 4.2L
Фроинтер, она же в России навара, разработана была в 2004 году, соответственно хороших результатов при таком краш тесте ждать не стоит, но я считаю, что для этой старой платформы вроде бы не плохо
Frointer, which is also navara in Russia, was developed in 2004, respectively, you should not expect good results with such a crash test, but I think it's not bad for this old platform
I enjoyed it. ❤️
Both Nissan and Toyota had to stop on a dime at the corner of the door/windshield post when it didn't crumple like the Chevy causing it to deflect side ways allowing additional forward movement, meaning the Chevy had the easiest test.
1:28 como se llama la pVt@ musica?
Es lo que también busco 😂
Creo que se llama final outing
Wow, the bed of the trucks about came off of in the Toyota tests.
Looks like the chevy did the best. It didn't have the rapid change in speed and 90 degree change in direction like the Toyota did. I do like the knee air bag on the Toyota though.
While I don't think that would be the case in this overlap crash test, I do agree that those air bags are nice there. It's definetly a plus to have them. No other truck had them
EGGINFOOLS I agree. I'd be curious as to how high the negitive G's were in the Toyota and Nissan, both have a much more violent forward movement on the occupants and seats than the Chevrolet, as well as more vehicle movement like you stated. The Nissan shoves the wheel right up through the foot well at 3:18 and 3:31 that would shatter the occupants left leg and the dash prob even breaks the right leg. Also, look how the front end stays mostly intact on the Colo compared to the Taco which was ripped clean off at 5:35 and the tweaked frame at cab/bed at 6:07, again high neg. G's. The Good rating for the Toyota should be Marginal like the Nissan. A false perception of current quality for Toyota, still resting on their laurels from the 80's and early 90's.
Key takeaway, the better built Chevy truck is absorbing more of the impact for the occupants.
Literally says the Toyota did better.. iihs knows more than you believe it or not
The chevy is a piece. Notice how it's bed crushed the cab from behind , and wheel cut in half and disintegrated
lukestoyz You want the wheels to break away not come back through the firewall into the footwell like the Nissan did. The cast aluminum wheels are designed to break on impact.
Notice how the weak Taco frame bends and pushes the bed several inches out.
Ins crash are the best test. 99% of crashes are off set. Well if you text while rearend people the Gov front will be good lol.
Muy bueno y mucha seguridad de emergencia por adentro dela camioneta
Jugamos free ?
I wonder if they scrap parts off of these cars or if they have to throw away the whole thing
Good job colorado
Thx guys for the likes ☺
After that is all down hill for the owners.
DJBATMANGOLD
Yes !
Colorado sucks
Why no Colorado Ext Cab?
could we please use Kim Jung Un as a test dummy?
What’s the name of the beginning song?
Imagine the damage at higher speeds.
Please reply to this comment why does the gas cover always open every time u crash because when I was watching this video eveytime u crash the gas cover opens
Toyota best rating
I agree 👍💯👍👍👍💯💯👍👍💯 causes Toyota Tacoma truck had the airbag for your legs should be in All sendan and trucks to day
Exelentes pruebas...!!!
Colorado💪
Silverado/Sierra 💪
ZeRø Fords way better
Chevy is a liar for there brand
how often do you hit something that wont move at all
Probably nil. In fact, this scenario almost impossible. At highways, there will be sidewalk (somewhat high) to push the vehicle upwards before it crash into the concrete wall to minimised the impact. At the divider, there are plastic barrels that filled with water to absorb the impact is a vehicle crash straight into it.
A likely possible scenario is that a truck is at your front, and you try to overtake it (at highway, so at high speed) and the truck somehow manage to stop at a stand still in less than one second, and you failed to avoid the rear of the truck by a few inch and crash with part of your front.
Nissans been using that same steering wheel design for a long time. It’s ugly
You guys don't get the Navara...way better than a Frontier
@@motorbloxx same truck isn't it?
Those Knee airbags are a genius idea
(1:12) SHIIIIIIIII-AAAOOWW!!!
yes
Amazing video 👍👍
Toyota Apparently forgot to put the bolts in the bed before it left the factory... typical
Sasquads lol
You do realize this truck is totaled, so it really doesn't make a difference at that point what the bed does.
Jeffrey Straight kinda would. It could have poped out completely in a real scenario and caused more accidents.
Darkdestroyer - don't you think that would have an impact on it's safety rating if that had ever happened?
That’s toyoyo reliable right there lol
Tundra 😀
Calroado 😁
Frontier 🤕
Tacoma is the only pickup on this test that has airbag for the knees that makes it more safer than others. Watch the video closely. Did you see it?. With no biased it would have been graded better than colorado
Bias ... You have to know how the rate the cars... And there isn't anything higher than good.
Joseph Namud your grammar is so bad I find myself sincerely hoping English is not your native language. It’s honestly hard to figure out what your point was.
Tacoma is the best, nothing but quality.
Luke Shaver but then it still got graded higher
Nissan Frontier King Cab Overall rating MARGINAL
Tacoma fell apart like legos
If it falls apart like that in the event of a crash, its a good sign. It means the energy of the impact is being distributed everywhere on the truck thus reducing the impact energy absorption on the driver and its passengers.
Also, Tacoma bed shifts in another direction, which is a genius design by Toyota. Since all the rear end weight isn't focused into the cabin and stays intact. Look at the interior slow motion shots of the A pillar and you'll see that Toyota is the only one that holds its shape.
go to where some dude gets a million miles on his Toyota, Toyota buys it back and completly tear it down so they can continue to improve their pickups. You must be a child with out a coloring book : (
E24 Schark um the Tacoma’s lifted off the ground when they hit the wall that is a bad sign that means the energy is traveling linearly through the truck thus lifting the rear end off the ground. Notice the Chevy didn’t jump in the back the frame under the bed on those is designed to bend under stress caused by crashes so the shock can be transmitted through the frame and not your spine
FACTS😁😁😁