Hi everyone! I hope you are all doing well! I hope you enjoy this latest compilation… Just a quick ask if you could help by subscribing to @littleharrydrifting channel. youtube.com/@littleharrydrifting?si=0-KEwfhe9uFOWpBp He is a family friend and is trying to push his channel with views and subscribers. Any watch and subscription will be an extreme help and I really appreciate it. Harry is a 12 year old drifter who is trying to enter more competitions and hopefully go international with his superb drifting skills! Have a great week. Best Regards UK Dash Cameras
2:10 J, I mean mate, you were going to overtake on a blind hill and corner coming up to a Junction. You would not have made that at all without cutting off the cyclist or having a close call with the approaching vehicle. You're at fault there bud.
They wouldn't even have been close to making it - the cyclist drifting out a bit is just the excuse they're using to save face. Plus the cyclist is perfectly entitled to sit in the middle of the lane if they want - you never know what they've potentially seen that might cause them problems on the inside of the road, after all.
didnt see any issue with this at all.. he pulled out safely to overtake, saw he couldnt and pulled back in.. whats the problem?? bit of a strange one really.
Given that the next clip J rushes through a light that had been Amber for a while it is clear they are just happy to take stupid risks. Clearly a dangerous driver.
Nick D 4:22 ...why get right up the back of someone that's slowing and indicating in that spot? Pretty obvious they were intending to pull in and park. Yes, they should've looked, but none it would've happened if you'd given them space 🤷🏼♀️
2:15 I don't think that cyclist did move out that far, just another car was coming the other way and you had to bail, the cyclist even signalled his intent to go left 😂
What I noticed is the keep left arrow in the middle of the road for oncoming traffic. Odd placement so close to the T Junction. That would point to that junction having a lot of corner-cutters coming from the left or/and wide-swingers coming from the right. Either way cyclist may have local knowledge and doesn't need an overtaker alongside.
Cyclist shouldn't of had to "block" you J, it was a stupid attempt at an overtake, even if the cyclist hadn't moved 1 foot out you shouldn't of attempted it. Downhill into a junction with stopped vehicles with a car coming the other way, risky manoeuvre for no gain.
@@summatsupeer85 facepalming yourself for not paying attention in school? Like, literally, how do you even get this wrong? How did you pass your spelling class? Do you spell things based on how it sounds? Why not write 'cyclist' as 'saiklist' then? You somehow know how to write 'manoeuvre' but at the same time haven't got the brain cells to know that 'should of' doesn't even make any sense. OOHH wait, you don't actually know how to write and 90% of what you type gets autocorrected.
They were too fast, couldn't even hold it steady around the corner, braked late and didn't assess the gap. I see Mike might seriously injure a kid one day in the near future, or worse.
I don't think it was "clearly" going to do that until it stopped, by which time Nick D was already blocking the parallel park. There was a turning ahead, a disabled bay ahead, and a pavement ahead with loads of cars parked on it. The left signal could've been indicating intent to go onto any of those instead of intent to parallel park. Yes, Nick ideally would've realised that the indicator was potentially indicating intent to parallel park and held back, but it wasn't as dumb a mistake as you're suggesting it was.
@@ChaseWilder We don't know that from what we can see in the video. For all we know he may have been unable to reverse due to another car behind him, and may have been leaning on his horn.
@@ExplodingCabbage could of been someone behind him but unless they are mm away he can still reverse. You would reverse and beep not just stay that. Could have even pulled forward and turned out and still wouldn’t have hit him as long as he had take the action immediately.
Quite right the cyclist move out to stop you overtaking at 2:05. You are coming up to a junction and a cyclist will take primary to stop anyone left hooking them. Take a look at rule 72 my friend as it will help explain it for you 👍 Did it delay your journey?
Cyclist deliberately moves to the centre of the road to prevent an impatient plum from endangering his life with a pointless overtake. How selfish of him.
@guvjimbike worse than that the cyclist was going left and J was turning right. A bit more patience and it would have been fine, but no! Must get in front!
2:10 So it turns out J is an absolute weapon. Firstly trying to overtake a cyclist within yards of a junction instead of waiting like a normal person (I bet the extra 3 seconds you had to wait really made a difference to your day). Then speeds up to get through an amber light [you can literally hear him jam on the accelerator] just to abscond a pedestrian (albeit an idiotic pedestrian). Learn to drive mate
To be fair to J on this one, the light turned to amber just as they got to the line, so they were perfectly entitled to carry on. The pedestrian was an idiot, and J's honk was far too late.
02:20 IMO the cyclist was bang on; you were going to overtake after hard acceleration towards a junction with more than one vehicle entering the road. The cyclist was a vulnerable road user with great foresight.
2:20 - yes, that's a sensible move on the part of the cyclist, it's called 'taking primary position' - in preventing the overtake, they keep themselves safe from idiots who think it's a great idea to overtake approaching a junction. Like J here.
You owe me a new pc monitor. fucking spat half my drink out, damn thats spot on. Same shit with him and lando a week or 2 back, just kamikaze into a corner and pray.
@@alfredh2079 I mean yeah? Its shit racing with stupid moves designed to force an overtake that shouldnt happen. No different than brake checking cars with DRS on a straight to stop them overtaking.
Ah, J what was the plan overtake in the face of oncoming traffic then immediately brake for the junction? Psssssst cyclists can use as much of as little of the lane as they like
Welcome to being a cyclists. I get god knows how many overtakes every ride where its obvious to anyone with a pair of eyes that they are going to be stuck at a red light or sit in traffic straight after overtaking. Does that stop them? Nah. Does it stop them when its unsafe to overtake? Of course not. MGIF.
Nick D at 4:22, a proper muppet - could see the car in front breaking and indicating for a space, it was clear to anyone with eyes what the car in front was doing, i.e. will be reversing into the space. Use your eyes and give them the space to reverse into the parking spot
2:05 - terrible caption here. If they were cycling in the middle of the road, they'd have been riding along the white line. What they were doing was riding in the middle of the lane. A channel of this size helping perpetuate anti-cyclist rhetoric this way is incredibly unhelpful
The uploader was quoting the submitter of the clip, hence the quotation marks. Considering it's such a touchy subject (even though it shouldn't be - I cycle everywhere myself and know all too well about that) I think it's a sensible thing to do to let people judge for themselves.
Exactly this. The cyclist has done nothing wrong. Many drivers do this unfortunately, overtaking a cyclist 20m from the junction or bus stop (for bus drivers) to cut him immediately is absolutely unnecessary and risky movement. No one loses anything if you stay behind for about 5 more secs.
J even if the cyclist did move in to the centre of the lane, its his lane and is perfectly legal to do, he may have seen a danger that you may not have know about. Most riders will take the lane of there is a pinch point, a pothole or something that they will do. Give them time. Besides you had to stop at the give way. ~Trooper
J cyclist was fine you were the plonker attempting that overtake, he NEVER moved to the centre of the road and when he shoulder checked he realised you were never going to give him 1.5 metres , just have more consideration of other road users in future
Nick D; if someone is indicating left with their reversing lights on it means they want to park in the empty space. Why block them off by driving right up behind them? A few seconds and a bit of courtesy goes a long way!
J, overtake to what and what deliberate move, who gets to the junction first ? at 3.0 you crossed over into his lane. Nick D imagine pulling right up behind a car that has just stopped and indicating and you sitting there on purpose. You are no better. Last clip, hair, make up or phone ?
I will never understand the mindset of people who think "oh, that person in front of me isn't going fast enough. So I will go in front of them and stop."
For Nick D's clip, I appreciate that the reversing car was absolutely at fault for that careless reverse. With that being said, it's disappointing how few people have any idea about people looking to parallel park, and just blindly drive right up behind people who have clearly indicated that they intend to do so. I have to parallel park on my road where I live, and the amount of times I've had to abandon doing so is insane, purely because people don't think to stop until they are a few inches behind you.
I have to do the same .. but I don't abandon it .. i sit there until the "Nick D"'s of this world either go around me or reverse back and give me space ... and besides .. they shouldn't be stopping that close to my bumper anyway ...
@@kittyhawk9707 Yeah that's fair, a few times I do wait and they move, but often I find it's easier to move on to save wasting everyone else's time (and my own as well).
easy enough to spot but there may have been some confusion as to where the car was going. it looked like he could have been indicating to take the left turn after the parked cars. the way to ensure that nobody closes down the space is to indicate and pull up next to the space, not in front, wait until traffic behind stops and then pull forward and manoeuvre into the space.
Wasn't really much point trying to overtake there anyway was there J? You were a few seconds from the junction, was it really too much hassle to just wait?
@@andyalder7910 I'm familiar with the dual pedal system, which the instructor used right after the incident to ensure the car didn't go anywhere; but they don't have a dual steering wheel. When the car moved again it was under the student's control.
"Cyclist deliberately swerves" is an interesting way to say you attempted a dangerous overtake on a cyclist whose positioning was fine...whilst approaching a junction.
Imagine trying to overtake the cyclist there right before a junction, and thinking the cyclist trying to protect his ass from your reckless driving is wrong... Dear oh dear. 2:10
The clip at 2:40 I've driven along that road many times but I can definitely tell the driver with the dashcam was way over the speed limit and the cyclist misjudged their speed. Many people seem to race through that road
6:49 - Why do people get agitated behind someone and overtake, only to slow down and/or stop? If they'd stayed where they were, they would have gotten further in their travels...
2.15. J. Cyclist deliberately moves to centre of road to prevent obertake? As he is supposed to take a priority position to ensure his safety. Read the highway code once more. As a more vulnerable road user the cyclist has priority over you.
@Vanessa.1990 To be fair the only reason you can't see the approaching vehicle is because the cammer pulled out behind the vehicle in front, so couldn't actually see if the road was clear or not. The cammer clearly performed a dangerous overtake by pulling out into the opposing carriageway when they couldn't see whether it was safe or not. And, yes the oncoming vehicle was just being a dick by not making the cammer's poor driving a non-issue. Two wrongs don't make a right as they say. But had the cammer not been directly behind the other vehicle, the oncoming one would have been clearly visible.
@vanessa clearly blind as the cammer dude when he followed the car to overtake u can see the on coming car clearly on dashcam so the driver should of clearly seen it before we can on dashcam. its cammer fault for being an idiot and following the car in front without looking.
@vanessa clearly blind as the cammer dude when he followed the car to overtake u can see the on coming car clearly on dashcam so the driver should of clearly seen it before we can on dashcam. its cammer fault for being an idiot and following the car in front without looking.
@@Pancakegirl12343 he stopped briefly, also incoming car was still far away. Why would you block a car that could easily gone in the gap and go on you're way. He just did himself dirty 🤷♀️
0:15 1) Large crowd of schoolkids at the bus stop. 2) Stationary bus(es) at the bus stop. 3) _Matt L_ cannot see if the road ahead is clear, so should not move to pass the stationary buses. 0:17 4) _Matt L_ moves slightly to the right and can see an oncoming vehicle, and has plenty of space to tuck back in behind the bus. He should have done so. 0:19 5) Instead _Matt L_ accelerates past the school buses, risking the lives of schoolchildren who might rush across the road. 6) _Matt L_ diverts blame on the oncoming driver, who had priority, to cover up his own appalling, dangerous driving. 7) _Matt L_ has Norfolk Incense.
What is Matt L shouting the odds for? Not up to the SAAB driver to reverse, Matt's fault for continuing to overtake. I would have sat there and not moved.
@@alanmtbuk: "There was plenty of time and room for the saab to slow down and let the cammer finish" The cammer - and how many cars after him, too? I've been in that exact situation many times: the first one goes into the opposite lane, and dozens of cars are following suit - everybody thinking "When the oncoming traffic waits for the first one, he'll have to wait for all the following, too." I would have done the same as the Saab driver: not to make them reverse the whole length of the obstacle (which wouldn't work anyway, because there would be six to nine more vehicles behind them), but to stop them long enough to realize what a crappy move that was. And the chances are better that the rest of the oncoming traffic realizes that they shouldn't follow the backed up queue of cars on the wrong side of the road. When you have to stop because a steady queue of cars is coming down your own lane - when do you think is the right moment to stop them from doing that?
Matt L shouldn't have gone if he couldn't clear the coaches. He could see the Saab was coming before he moved. If he couldn't see the Saab before he moved then it would be different
7:52 I honestly blame the BMW driver there. People don't seem to realise how stupid people become when you let them pull out before you. They don't look. They just go. He was sat behind a give way line. He can wait.
@@SVEVelsen in the uk this is the case, check the highway code..! riding in the centre of their lane on quiet roads, in slower-moving traffic and at the approach to junctions or road narrowings.
@@SVEVelsen "Never cause nuisance or danger out of entitlement." tell that to all the stupid drivers who treat us cyclists like dirt because they "pay road tax" and we don't. besides, riding in the middle of the lane has nothing to do with entitlement but with getting to my destination in one piece. and yes, that is something i, as a road user, am entitled to.
00:15 silly overtake of a school bus. 1:44, cammer going to fast, hang on 'the same cammer that went OTT with the horn at 1:36. 4:41, I wonder how many people guessed what the car in front of the cammer was going to do, I hope a lot. 5:42, I hope if I ever come across this cammer they are in front and not behind as they seemed slow to react
Nick D. Imagine applying a left signal and breaking to perform a reverse parallel park with the car behind you at least one car length behind the first car of the gap then only to have them come right up their chuff and preventing them to carryout the manoeuvre. Yes tney should have seen you but its not as if you had no time to stop before clearing the first car.
6:17 - that is a stop line, presumably for the prescise reason indicated in the comment. It is also amazing tat he can't tolerate being held up for a few seconds at a junction and yet he is perfectly happy to stop in the middle of the road to inconvenience you (and by extension himself).
It's not upto Mike to stop. But it's upto the other driver to stop as he's the one having to pull out because of parked cars or car. About time you read the Highway Code
" how did you manage that then" Maybe because wolfe, you took up both lanes on the roundabout thinking you were on a racetrack, and collided with the car on the inside lane
7:20 "what was that?" -a car hidden by an A-pillar and a honking big set of mirrors. Yeah, HGV driver should have been aware of that, but we all have lapses / get pre-occupied and events conspired to where the cam car had to stop. It's the end of the world, I tell ya!!
Hi everyone!
I hope you are all doing well! I hope you enjoy this latest compilation…
Just a quick ask if you could help by subscribing to @littleharrydrifting channel. youtube.com/@littleharrydrifting?si=0-KEwfhe9uFOWpBp
He is a family friend and is trying to push his channel with views and subscribers. Any watch and subscription will be an extreme help and I really appreciate it.
Harry is a 12 year old drifter who is trying to enter more competitions and hopefully go international with his superb drifting skills!
Have a great week.
Best Regards
UK Dash Cameras
I subscribed to him 😊
Done 😊
Subscribed 👍
First guy is in the wrong he is illegally overtaking!
2:10 J, I mean mate, you were going to overtake on a blind hill and corner coming up to a Junction. You would not have made that at all without cutting off the cyclist or having a close call with the approaching vehicle. You're at fault there bud.
They wouldn't even have been close to making it - the cyclist drifting out a bit is just the excuse they're using to save face. Plus the cyclist is perfectly entitled to sit in the middle of the lane if they want - you never know what they've potentially seen that might cause them problems on the inside of the road, after all.
I don't think J is getting the results he was hoping for from reading the comments section 😂
didnt see any issue with this at all.. he pulled out safely to overtake, saw he couldnt and pulled back in.. whats the problem?? bit of a strange one really.
Given that the next clip J rushes through a light that had been Amber for a while it is clear they are just happy to take stupid risks. Clearly a dangerous driver.
Just wonder if the J is short for Jedi...
The kid giving the car driver the finger Brilliant!!! 😂
Yea is an idiot!
That Norfolk Monkey is now a Star!
Can quickly spot a dickhead at that age - he'll go far
That Saab would’ve had my DNA all over the drivers door window😉
I think that was the main reason he reversed, the kid shamed him i to doing it😂
Nick D 4:22 ...why get right up the back of someone that's slowing and indicating in that spot? Pretty obvious they were intending to pull in and park. Yes, they should've looked, but none it would've happened if you'd given them space 🤷🏼♀️
Came to say the same.
Indeed. Really hope the other driver wasn't declared to be wholly to blame by insurance etc.
👍👍
@@carlstyth8368 me too
@monocledj
@carlstyth8368
me too too
Love how the bystanders sorted out No. 1
2:15 I don't think that cyclist did move out that far, just another car was coming the other way and you had to bail, the cyclist even signalled his intent to go left 😂
IT IS THE TYPICAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS CYCLISTS. 👍
I don't know why the driver would want to pass on the approach to a junction anyway.
@@dimebarcocker true, would have got past him then 10 seconds later cyclists would be alongside at the give way, pointless really. 🤷🏻♂️
Whoever submitted that clip needs to hand their licence back.
What I noticed is the keep left arrow in the middle of the road for oncoming traffic. Odd placement so close to the T Junction. That would point to that junction having a lot of corner-cutters coming from the left or/and wide-swingers coming from the right. Either way cyclist may have local knowledge and doesn't need an overtaker alongside.
Cyclist shouldn't of had to "block" you J, it was a stupid attempt at an overtake, even if the cyclist hadn't moved 1 foot out you shouldn't of attempted it. Downhill into a junction with stopped vehicles with a car coming the other way, risky manoeuvre for no gain.
*shouldn't HAVE
@@leme3503beat me to it
@@leme3503. Let it go, man/ women/thing/it.. Deep breathing and let it go
@@leme3503 🤦♂
@@summatsupeer85 facepalming yourself for not paying attention in school? Like, literally, how do you even get this wrong? How did you pass your spelling class? Do you spell things based on how it sounds? Why not write 'cyclist' as 'saiklist' then? You somehow know how to write 'manoeuvre' but at the same time haven't got the brain cells to know that 'should of' doesn't even make any sense. OOHH wait, you don't actually know how to write and 90% of what you type gets autocorrected.
1:44 Mike600RR, if you didn't drive like you are late for your own funeral, maybe things like that wouldn't happen
Brakes way too late also.
And doesn’t pull to the left at all!
They were too fast, couldn't even hold it steady around the corner, braked late and didn't assess the gap. I see Mike might seriously injure a kid one day in the near future, or worse.
I'm glad gentlemen of culture all agree that mike is a bellend. I came to say the same thing
The speed through there was mental
J 2:15 that would've been a completely pointless overtake and in fact a cut up.
yep. Wouldve gained nothing overtaking so close to a junction
@@seansamurai1981 Another cager only thinking as far forward as the tip of their bonnet!
Nick D, imagine being so close to a vehicle that was clearly about to parallel park and then not giving them the space to do so.
I don't think it was "clearly" going to do that until it stopped, by which time Nick D was already blocking the parallel park. There was a turning ahead, a disabled bay ahead, and a pavement ahead with loads of cars parked on it. The left signal could've been indicating intent to go onto any of those instead of intent to parallel park. Yes, Nick ideally would've realised that the indicator was potentially indicating intent to parallel park and held back, but it wasn't as dumb a mistake as you're suggesting it was.
Dude didn’t even try and reverse or anything just sat there and let them hit him. Should have taken action moment reversing lights came on.
@@ChaseWilder We don't know that from what we can see in the video. For all we know he may have been unable to reverse due to another car behind him, and may have been leaning on his horn.
@@ExplodingCabbage could of been someone behind him but unless they are mm away he can still reverse. You would reverse and beep not just stay that. Could have even pulled forward and turned out and still wouldn’t have hit him as long as he had take the action immediately.
Quite right the cyclist move out to stop you overtaking at 2:05. You are coming up to a junction and a cyclist will take primary to stop anyone left hooking them. Take a look at rule 72 my friend as it will help explain it for you 👍
Did it delay your journey?
@smilerbob. Spot on
Rule 72 is about transporting children and small animals in commercial vehicles, did you mean Rule 42?
@@123MondayTuesdayIt was a good job the cyclist remebered his towel that day
👍👍
@@123MondayTuesday This comment reminds me of Red Dwarf, when Rimmer quotes rules and Kryton corrects him on the proper rule.
4:32 No imagine seeing someone pull up in front of a space, see their reverse lights go on and not do anything....
Completely oblivious to the drivers obvious intentions. Then trying to belittle the driver because of his own stupidity
@@benstevenson8874it’s still pretty stupid to reverse into a stationary vehicle though
@@TheLink1977 It's also pretty stupid to not realise that the car was wanting to parallel park. A shambles from all involved really!
Cyclist deliberately moves to the centre of the road to prevent an impatient plum from endangering his life with a pointless overtake. How selfish of him.
Exactly.. And the fact Both Cars were coming up to a T junction as
Well.
@guvjimbike worse than that the cyclist was going left and J was turning right. A bit more patience and it would have been fine, but no! Must get in front!
That's a smart move J,trying to pass coming up to a junction
J, you were approaching a T junction with on coming traffic that you couldn't see. That cyclist may have just saved you causing an accident.
Nick D, imagine not reading to road in front of you to work out what they were about to do.
Yep at about the 4:26 mark Nick should've anticipated the parallel park and stopped there
@1:30 Mike, you’ve got a kid in the car and that was a minor inconvenience at most. Calm down ffs.
2:10
So it turns out J is an absolute weapon. Firstly trying to overtake a cyclist within yards of a junction instead of waiting like a normal person (I bet the extra 3 seconds you had to wait really made a difference to your day).
Then speeds up to get through an amber light [you can literally hear him jam on the accelerator] just to abscond a pedestrian (albeit an idiotic pedestrian).
Learn to drive mate
It’s perfectly legal to speed up to make it through an amber light, some road organisations even recommend it in certain situations
@@Kieran.RobertsonAmber light means stop, unless it's unsafe to do so.
To be fair to J on this one, the light turned to amber just as they got to the line, so they were perfectly entitled to carry on. The pedestrian was an idiot, and J's honk was far too late.
@@poglewood1691 Yes that’s exactly what I’m referring to…
-+3 seconds gained for the overtake.
-3 seconds lost waiting behind the 2 cars on arrival at the junction.
0 seconds gained.
9:45 - Imagine crashing into the back of a LEARNER driver...😆
02:20 IMO the cyclist was bang on; you were going to overtake after hard acceleration towards a junction with more than one vehicle entering the road. The cyclist was a vulnerable road user with great foresight.
2:20 - yes, that's a sensible move on the part of the cyclist, it's called 'taking primary position' - in preventing the overtake, they keep themselves safe from idiots who think it's a great idea to overtake approaching a junction. Like J here.
09:59 Woman is so low in her seat she can barely see the road.
Yup, driving a Fiesta 135 Metal Edition.
Didn’t really matter, given that she wasn’t bothered about seeing forward anyway!
Precisely. The question is does she know that the seats can be raised but can she be bothered trying to do this?
8:06 looks like Max Verstappen overtaking Lewis Hamilton
You owe me a new pc monitor. fucking spat half my drink out, damn thats spot on. Same shit with him and lando a week or 2 back, just kamikaze into a corner and pray.
That was Max VW-erstappen!
@@ExaltedwithFail Actually, that's called racing mate
@@alfredh2079 I mean yeah? Its shit racing with stupid moves designed to force an overtake that shouldnt happen. No different than brake checking cars with DRS on a straight to stop them overtaking.
Ah, J what was the plan overtake in the face of oncoming traffic then immediately brake for the junction? Psssssst cyclists can use as much of as little of the lane as they like
Why would J attempt the overtake knowing theres a junction right there 🤦♂️. Wait 20 seconds ffs
I think it's because 'J' is really JediAvenger under a different name after all the negative comments that JediAvenger has been receiving!
Welcome to being a cyclists. I get god knows how many overtakes every ride where its obvious to anyone with a pair of eyes that they are going to be stuck at a red light or sit in traffic straight after overtaking. Does that stop them? Nah. Does it stop them when its unsafe to overtake? Of course not. MGIF.
Nick D at 4:22, a proper muppet - could see the car in front breaking and indicating for a space, it was clear to anyone with eyes what the car in front was doing, i.e. will be reversing into the space. Use your eyes and give them the space to reverse into the parking spot
This.
And this ☝️
How do you know he even had the option to give them space?
There could have been traffic behind them.
@@Ultrazaubererger Wouldn't have mattered what was behind, the cammer could've easily used his eyes and stopped to give the car the space to reverse.
If only there was some sort of device that could make an auditory signal to alert the car in front he was about to reverse into another car.
2:28 - hmm, using their horn to reprimand a pedestrian, submitted by J...could it be JediAvenger?
Nah, that pedestrian ran out into traffic. JediAvenger only blares the horn at pedestrians crossing safely.
Pedestrian doesn't have the right of way
@scotty281976 I think you mean they didn't have priority. No such thing as right of way.
Would have been funny if it was but I noticed he was driving in glasgow city centre so doubt it is the same person
@@jasimmathsandphysics Who knows, JediAvenger could've been on a holiday.
So we all in agreement j wins the trophy this week
Nick at 4:40, imagine not using your horn to warn another road user of your presence. Yes they should have looked but you could've helped.
2:05 - terrible caption here. If they were cycling in the middle of the road, they'd have been riding along the white line. What they were doing was riding in the middle of the lane.
A channel of this size helping perpetuate anti-cyclist rhetoric this way is incredibly unhelpful
100% agree. Piss poor caption. "Driver fails dangerous and pointless overtake" would be an alternative.
I’ve always assumed the captions come from the cammers themselves when they email their clips in
The uploader was quoting the submitter of the clip, hence the quotation marks. Considering it's such a touchy subject (even though it shouldn't be - I cycle everywhere myself and know all too well about that) I think it's a sensible thing to do to let people judge for themselves.
Exactly this. The cyclist has done nothing wrong. Many drivers do this unfortunately, overtaking a cyclist 20m from the junction or bus stop (for bus drivers) to cut him immediately is absolutely unnecessary and risky movement. No one loses anything if you stay behind for about 5 more secs.
I think the caption was from the cammer for this one, its the only one with quotation marks
2:10 Cyclist took primary position as they were approaching a roundabout. Correct thing to do.
A roundabout? Looks like a T-junction to me. You should go to Specsavers.
@@stephenclark9917 awesome
9:55 there's no way she can even see the road past her dashboard sitting that low... Raise your seat!
does mike600 seriously consider himself a good driver?!?!?!
Nobody else does, his driving is abysmal!
what was with the hammering of his horn at 1:41? The black van was nowhere near.
All very unnecessary and melodramatic.
What a melt
J overtaking the cyclist right before the junction is a tragic little man
J even if the cyclist did move in to the centre of the lane, its his lane and is perfectly legal to do, he may have seen a danger that you may not have know about. Most riders will take the lane of there is a pinch point, a pothole or something that they will do. Give them time. Besides you had to stop at the give way. ~Trooper
8:39, the word "almost" was doing some heavy lifting there 😂
J cyclist was fine you were the plonker attempting that overtake, he NEVER moved to the centre of the road and when he shoulder checked he realised you were never going to give him 1.5 metres , just have more consideration of other road users in future
Not gonna happen is it,it seems to be bred into these morons.
2:10 that's some good cycling there.
How did J pass his hazard perception test with a lack of awareness like that!?
4:22 nick d
If only you had given the driver a little space but no.
Hence the reverse into your car😂😂
Saab driver just had to create a scene holding everyone up just to prove how "right" he is, what a knob.
You can almost guarantee he had a dashcam too.
Yep: I’m waiting for the view from the Saab to turn up on another dash cam channel!
@@neiltonks4627 Probably JediAvenger.
He thinks he's the dogs bollocks in his 20 year old Saab
"But I had right of way. Right of way. Right of way."
Nick D; if someone is indicating left with their reversing lights on it means they want to park in the empty space. Why block them off by driving right up behind them? A few seconds and a bit of courtesy goes a long way!
J, overtake to what and what deliberate move, who gets to the junction first ? at 3.0 you crossed over into his lane. Nick D imagine pulling right up behind a car that has just stopped and indicating and you sitting there on purpose. You are no better. Last clip, hair, make up or phone ?
J - what were you thinking with the junction coming up 🤷♂️
I will never understand the mindset of people who think "oh, that person in front of me isn't going fast enough. So I will go in front of them and stop."
That bloke with the deep voice is involved in a lot of these
😂😂😂
Frank Bruno gets around a bit
7:47 first time rear ended and nearly second time rear ended as you pull out on the red Citroën
😂
For Nick D's clip, I appreciate that the reversing car was absolutely at fault for that careless reverse. With that being said, it's disappointing how few people have any idea about people looking to parallel park, and just blindly drive right up behind people who have clearly indicated that they intend to do so. I have to parallel park on my road where I live, and the amount of times I've had to abandon doing so is insane, purely because people don't think to stop until they are a few inches behind you.
I have to do the same .. but I don't abandon it .. i sit there until the "Nick D"'s of this world either go around me or reverse back and give me space ... and besides .. they shouldn't be stopping that close to my bumper anyway ...
@@kittyhawk9707 Yeah that's fair, a few times I do wait and they move, but often I find it's easier to move on to save wasting everyone else's time (and my own as well).
easy enough to spot but there may have been some confusion as to where the car was going. it looked like he could have been indicating to take the left turn after the parked cars. the way to ensure that nobody closes down the space is to indicate and pull up next to the space, not in front, wait until traffic behind stops and then pull forward and manoeuvre into the space.
@@spiderbootsy That could work in some situations, knowing my luck if I then pulled forward they would immediately do the same thing lol
Wasn't really much point trying to overtake there anyway was there J? You were a few seconds from the junction, was it really too much hassle to just wait?
I nominate J for TOTW... Tries to pointlessly overtake a cyclist whilst coming up to a junction and then submits a clip moaning about the cyclist...
First time this car has been rear-ended. Almost 2nd time as well as the instructor pulls out in front of a red Citroen.
The instructor wasn't driving 🙄
@@richardrussell7082 He was after he said "give me the pedals".
@@andyalder7910 I'm familiar with the dual pedal system, which the instructor used right after the incident to ensure the car didn't go anywhere; but they don't have a dual steering wheel. When the car moved again it was under the student's control.
"Cyclist deliberately swerves" is an interesting way to say you attempted a dangerous overtake on a cyclist whose positioning was fine...whilst approaching a junction.
8:23 made me jump with the sudden noise with headphones on lol
Imagine trying to overtake the cyclist there right before a junction, and thinking the cyclist trying to protect his ass from your reckless driving is wrong...
Dear oh dear. 2:10
Some shocking professional HGV driving this time.
My thoughts exactly👍👍
That's not unusual these days.
The clip at 2:40 I've driven along that road many times but I can definitely tell the driver with the dashcam was way over the speed limit and the cyclist misjudged their speed. Many people seem to race through that road
Yeah the street lamps and lack of any repeaters says to me it's a 30mph and they seem to be doing 50 maybe
@problemchild1976 it's a national speed limit but I reckon it's closer to 70-80mph
@@Lewis_Treff97 then it's a 70 due to dual carriageway
6:49 - Why do people get agitated behind someone and overtake, only to slow down and/or stop? If they'd stayed where they were, they would have gotten further in their travels...
Intelligence issue
2.15. J. Cyclist deliberately moves to centre of road to prevent obertake? As he is supposed to take a priority position to ensure his safety. Read the highway code once more. As a more vulnerable road user the cyclist has priority over you.
Damn first clip. Glad people made him aware he was the idiot. When cammer overtook other car was not even in sight. He sped up to block him. 😂
I’ve had an idiot do exactly the same thing to me, there was a gap I could have pulled into to let them past and they sped up to block it
@Vanessa.1990
To be fair the only reason you can't see the approaching vehicle is because the cammer pulled out behind the vehicle in front, so couldn't actually see if the road was clear or not.
The cammer clearly performed a dangerous overtake by pulling out into the opposing carriageway when they couldn't see whether it was safe or not.
And, yes the oncoming vehicle was just being a dick by not making the cammer's poor driving a non-issue.
Two wrongs don't make a right as they say.
But had the cammer not been directly behind the other vehicle, the oncoming one would have been clearly visible.
@vanessa clearly blind as the cammer dude when he followed the car to overtake u can see the on coming car clearly on dashcam so the driver should of clearly seen it before we can on dashcam. its cammer fault for being an idiot and following the car in front without looking.
@vanessa clearly blind as the cammer dude when he followed the car to overtake u can see the on coming car clearly on dashcam so the driver should of clearly seen it before we can on dashcam. its cammer fault for being an idiot and following the car in front without looking.
@@Pancakegirl12343 he stopped briefly, also incoming car was still far away. Why would you block a car that could easily gone in the gap and go on you're way. He just did himself dirty 🤷♀️
J = Jediavenger ???
I think jedi was driving the saab
02:15 oh dear, this clip didn't quite get the anti-cyclist reaction J or the channel owner hoped for! 😂😂
Thomas N reaction and anticipation level 9000 🙏
final clip rear end shunt sounded like it was a learner on a lesson! Not a nice thing to happen anyone but especially for a learner!
0:15
1) Large crowd of schoolkids at the bus stop.
2) Stationary bus(es) at the bus stop.
3) _Matt L_ cannot see if the road ahead is clear, so should not move to pass the stationary buses.
0:17
4) _Matt L_ moves slightly to the right and can see an oncoming vehicle, and has plenty of space to tuck back in behind the bus. He should have done so.
0:19
5) Instead _Matt L_ accelerates past the school buses, risking the lives of schoolchildren who might rush across the road.
6) _Matt L_ diverts blame on the oncoming driver, who had priority, to cover up his own appalling, dangerous driving.
7) _Matt L_ has Norfolk Incense.
Saab driver make the situation even worse by deliberately bringing the entire road to a standstill.
I came for the comments about J. I wasn't disappointed. COTW
What is Matt L shouting the odds for? Not up to the SAAB driver to reverse, Matt's fault for continuing to overtake. I would have sat there and not moved.
There was plenty of time and room for the saab to slow down and let the cammer finish
@@alanmtbuk: "There was plenty of time and room for the saab to slow down and let the cammer finish"
The cammer - and how many cars after him, too? I've been in that exact situation many times: the first one goes into the opposite lane, and dozens of cars are following suit - everybody thinking "When the oncoming traffic waits for the first one, he'll have to wait for all the following, too." I would have done the same as the Saab driver: not to make them reverse the whole length of the obstacle (which wouldn't work anyway, because there would be six to nine more vehicles behind them), but to stop them long enough to realize what a crappy move that was. And the chances are better that the rest of the oncoming traffic realizes that they shouldn't follow the backed up queue of cars on the wrong side of the road.
When you have to stop because a steady queue of cars is coming down your own lane - when do you think is the right moment to stop them from doing that?
Matt L shouldn't have gone if he couldn't clear the coaches. He could see the Saab was coming before he moved. If he couldn't see the Saab before he moved then it would be different
You know full well the 1st clip the oncoming car is a dashcammer desperately trying to get content to send in.
JediVagina or whatever his name is.
I thought the same, maybe we see their footage next week..."driver passes bus without giving way (ignore me accelerating to block)"
7:52 I honestly blame the BMW driver there. People don't seem to realise how stupid people become when you let them pull out before you. They don't look. They just go. He was sat behind a give way line. He can wait.
Didn't even realise my clip got featured until now hah
9:44 - sure some of these drivers need a booster seat to see over the steering wheel
Thanks
Wooooo my clip made the cut!
In that first clip…. That’s definitely JediAvenger in the SAAB.
1:44 is it just me misjudging it, or is the the dashcammer going well too fast for that bit of road ?
Came here for the J comments and wasn't disappointed!
Nick D wants a new car by the stupidity of that stop
Brilliant video, that opening shot was 🔥
J for NHOTW?
NHOTW?
Nob head ?
I wonder if Nick and the Golf drivers guide dogs went on a doggy playdate......
cyclist right to use the whole lane of a road
Yep. Safety is more important. If the car can't overtake, tough. And if we cyclists don't look out for our own safety, then WHO WILL?
No they're not. Blocking the road is illegal. Go join JSO if you believe that BS.
Never cause nuisance or danger out of entitlement.
@@SVEVelsen in the uk this is the case, check the highway code..!
riding in the centre of their lane on quiet roads, in slower-moving traffic and at the approach to junctions or road narrowings.
@@SVEVelsen
"Never cause nuisance or danger out of entitlement."
tell that to all the stupid drivers who treat us cyclists like dirt because they "pay road tax" and we don't.
besides, riding in the middle of the lane has nothing to do with entitlement but with getting to my destination in one piece. and yes, that is something i, as a road user, am entitled to.
"Pedestrian run out," but if you had stopped at the previous lights as you should have ,there would be no issue.
Not Wolfe submitting a novel with his footage 😂
00:15 silly overtake of a school bus. 1:44, cammer going to fast, hang on 'the same cammer that went OTT with the horn at 1:36. 4:41, I wonder how many people guessed what the car in front of the cammer was going to do, I hope a lot. 5:42, I hope if I ever come across this cammer they are in front and not behind as they seemed slow to react
Nick D. Imagine applying a left signal and breaking to perform a reverse parallel park with the car behind you at least one car length behind the first car of the gap then only to have them come right up their chuff and preventing them to carryout the manoeuvre. Yes tney should have seen you but its not as if you had no time to stop before clearing the first car.
1:50 "I drive like a fu**ing lunatic and other people are at fault for not letting me"
6:17 - that is a stop line, presumably for the prescise reason indicated in the comment. It is also amazing tat he can't tolerate being held up for a few seconds at a junction and yet he is perfectly happy to stop in the middle of the road to inconvenience you (and by extension himself).
1:45 Nothing like a hit and run
@2:57… jnc 30. M5. It’s a nightmare
Totally agree. I hate trying to get to the services there. Cock up from start to finish.
1st clip why is that uploaded? Technically it is the Saab and the oncoming vehicles right of way
So you think having right of way allows you to block the entire road does it, just so you can prove your point?
J, TOTW every week!.
Um, J...what kind of non event was that? 😂😂😂
1:44 Mike you're not on the bike now, gaps aren't as easy to squeak through!
It's not upto Mike to stop. But it's upto the other driver to stop as he's the one having to pull out because of parked cars or car. About time you read the Highway Code
Wolfe lives in fantasy land
" how did you manage that then"
Maybe because wolfe, you took up both lanes on the roundabout thinking you were on a racetrack, and collided with the car on the inside lane
Big shout out to the great names this week,"Thermionic Valve" and "YouPromisedMeCake" 😂 kudos to you 👍
Scrolled for the comments on J's p!ss poor driving.
Wasn't disappointed.
1:08 omg a camper doing the sensible thing. I was expecting them to drive on and then be surprised when they hit the back of the road sweeper.
7:20 "what was that?" -a car hidden by an A-pillar and a honking big set of mirrors. Yeah, HGV driver should have been aware of that, but we all have lapses / get pre-occupied and events conspired to where the cam car had to stop. It's the end of the world, I tell ya!!
2:32 Illegal use of the horn. 3 points and £100 fine.
If that law was upheld, half of the cammers on this channel would be in debt with fines.
I actually held my breathe at 1:01
Yay. Bishopstone.
2:10 imagine being J and not getting the response you wanted 🤭